Published April 30, 2020 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Agelescape Levy 1996

Description

Agelescape Levy, 1996

Agelescape Levy 1996: 88; Guseinov, Marusik & Koponen 2005: 155.

Type species: Agelena livida Simon, 1875 by original designation.

Remarks: Agelescape has only been taxonomically considered in the two publications mentioned above. Levy (1996: 88) diagnosed the genus as having an epigynal scape and by “the particular configuration of the male palpal sclerite”. Guseinov, Marusik & Koponen (2005) mentioned a character that allowed the separation of Agelescape from Agelena: the number of retrolateral tibial apophyses, one in Agelescape and two in Agelena; however, both of these genera are poorly delimited and encompass species that are quite different from their generotypes.

Additionally, comparison of A. gideoni Levy, 1996 and species occurring in the Caucasus to A. livida, the type species, revealed differences in the number of bulbal sclerites of the palps and the presence/absence of tubular ducts of the epigynes (Guseinov, Marusik & Koponen 2005); however, these differences do not occur between A. livida and A. afFnis. Thus, we split Agelescape into two genera, with A. livida and A. afFnis remaining, and others placed in Persiscape gen. n.

Diagnosis: Males of Agelescape differ from all other Old World Agelenini (except for Benoitia Lehtinen, 1967) by having a long, filamentous embolus (>š tegulum length), and a long (>š tegulum length), gradually tapering, straight conductor (v. embolus not filamentous, with a distinct base, and a twisted conductor) (Figs. 4 A–B, 5A–B, 6D). Age- lescape males differ from those of Benoitia by the straight conductor. Females differ from other Old World Agelenini by having distinct tubular ducts (v. absent in other genera) and lack of globular receptacles (v. present in other genera) (Fig. 8 D–E, G).

Remarks: Levy (1996) indicated that Agelescape has 3–4 prolateral teeth and 2–4 retrolateral teeth on the chelicera. Based on our material, in the two species remaining in the genus there are 3 prolateral and 3–4 retrolateral teeth.

Included species: A. livida and A. afFnis.

Distribution: From the Iberian Peninsula to Israel (Fig. 15A).

Notes

Published as part of Zamani, Alireza & Marusik, Yuri M., 2020, A review of Agelenini (Araneae: Agelenidae: Ageleninae) of Iran and Tajikistan, with descriptions of four new genera, pp. 368-386 in Arachnology 18 (4) on page 371, DOI: 10.13156/arac.2020.18.4.368, http://zenodo.org/record/3925217

Files

Files (2.8 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:e288c07cd0615ddfd488feada4573637
2.8 kB Download

System files (19.5 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:8ada60f76caa427896307cd8b7e22496
19.5 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Scientific name authorship
Levy
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
Arthropoda
Order
Araneae
Family
Agelenidae
Genus
Agelescape
Taxon rank
genus
Taxonomic concept label
Agelescape Levy, 1996 sec. Zamani & Marusik, 2020

References

  • LEVY, G. 1996: The agelenid funnel-weaver family and the spider genus Cedicus in Israel (Araneae, Agelenidae and Cybaeidae). Zoologica Scripta 25: 85 - 122.
  • GUSEINOV, E., MARUSIK, Y. M. & KOPONEN, S. 2005: Spiders (Arachnida: Aranei) ofAzerbaijan 5. Faunistic review of the funnelweb spiders (Agelenidae) with the description of a new genus and species. Arthropoda Selecta 14: 153 - 177.
  • SIMON, E. 1875: Les arachnides de France, tome B. Paris: Roret: 1 - 350.
  • LEHTINEN, P. T. 1967: Classification of the cribellate spiders and some allied families, with notes on the evolution of the suborder Araneomorpha. Annales Zoologici Fennici 4: 199 - 468.