Published September 17, 2020
| Version v2
Journal article
Open
Rebuttal to the Yan Report
Description
On September 14th, Yan et al published some nonsense. There are four big issues with it that scream hoax for me:
-
This is not peer reviewed.
-
This type of study has already been done by respected institutes and published in very respected journals, and there are those that have doubled-down on the quality of that research.
-
The ethics surrounding the authors is suspect at best, and intentionally malicious at worst.
-
The science itself is bad.
Conclusion: The Yan Report is bad.
Files
Rebuttal to the Yan Report v2.pdf
Files
(415.4 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:f035ed805ac6b6f1b97d5ed22d403610
|
207.7 kB | Preview Download |
|
md5:cf4812a16f312a8f0cd070d12e4b9d3e
|
207.7 kB | Preview Download |