Published September 17, 2020 | Version v2

Rebuttal to the Yan Report

  • 1. None
  • 2. Mythology

Description

On September 14th, Yan et al published some nonsense. There are four big issues with it that scream hoax for me:

  1. This is not peer reviewed.

  2. This type of study has already been done by respected institutes and published in very respected journals, and there are those that have doubled-down on the quality of that research.

  3. The ethics surrounding the authors is suspect at best, and intentionally malicious at worst.

  4. The science itself is bad.

Conclusion: The Yan Report is bad.

Files

Rebuttal to the Yan Report v2.pdf

Files (415.4 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:f035ed805ac6b6f1b97d5ed22d403610
207.7 kB Preview Download
md5:cf4812a16f312a8f0cd070d12e4b9d3e
207.7 kB Preview Download