Network analysis reflects the trophic relationship between microbial colonizers and deadwood resources - supporting information

Supporting tables S2 - S5 of "Network analysis reflects the trophic relationship between microbial colonizers and deadwood resources".

The file Table_Legends_S2-S5.txt contains all legends, as given below:

Table S2: Module-associated trees and OTUs, their relative abundances and identities for the fungal sapwood network; module – name of the module, present – proportion of network version that the OTU is present in (1 = 1000/1000), inBestModule – proportion of the network versions where the OTU is associated with the respective module, percInBestModule – proportion of the network versions where the OTU is associated with the respective module provided that the OTU is part of the network (= inBestModule/present), meanAbundanceModuleSamples – mean relative abundance of the OTU in all samples belonging to the module, meanAbundanceOtherSamples – mean relative abundance of the OTU in all other samples, relAbundanceModuleSamplesVsOthers – meanAbundanceModuleSamples / meanAbundanceOtherSamples .

Table S3: Module-associated trees and OTUs, their relative abundances and identities for the fungal heartwood network; module – name of the module, present – proportion of network version that the OTU is present in (1 = 1000/1000), inBestModule – proportion of the network versions where the OTU is associated with the respective module, percInBestModule – proportion of the network versions where the OTU is associated with the respective module provided that the OTU is part of the network (= inBestModule/present), meanAbundanceModuleSamples – mean relative abundance of the OTU in all samples belonging to the module, meanAbundanceOtherSamples – mean relative abundance of the OTU in all other samples, relAbundanceModuleSamplesVsOthers – meanAbundanceModuleSamples / meanAbundanceOtherSamples .

Table S4: Module-associated trees and OTUs, their relative abundances and identities for the prokaryotic sapwood network; module – name of the module, present – proportion of network version that the OTU is present in (1 = 1000/1000), inBestModule – proportion of the network versions where the OTU is associated with the respective module, percInBestModule – proportion of the network versions where the OTU is associated with the respective module provided that the OTU is part of the network (= inBestModule/present), meanAbundanceModuleSamples – mean relative abundance of the OTU in all samples belonging to the module, meanAbundanceOtherSamples – mean relative abundance of the OTU in all other samples, relAbundanceModuleSamplesVsOthers – meanAbundanceModuleSamples / meanAbundanceOtherSamples .

Table S5: Module-associated trees and OTUs, their relative abundances and identities for the prokaryotic heartwood network; module – name of the module, present – proportion of network version that the OTU is present in (1 = 1000/1000), inBestModule – proportion of the network versions where the OTU is associated with the respective module, percInBestModule – proportion of the network versions where the OTU is associated with the respective module provided that the OTU is part of the network (= inBestModule/present), meanAbundanceModuleSamples – mean relative abundance of the OTU in all samples belonging to the module, meanAbundanceOtherSamples – mean relative abundance of the OTU in all other samples, relAbundanceModuleSamplesVsOthers – meanAbundanceModuleSamples / meanAbundanceOtherSamples .