Published May 28, 2020 | Version v1

Could dementia be detected from UK primary care patients' records by simple automated methods earlier than by the treating physician? A retrospective case-control study - Extended Data

  • 1. Brighton and Sussex Medical School
  • 2. Department of Computer Science, Humboldt-Universitat zu Berlin
  • 3. Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Sussex
  • 4. Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth

Description

Extended data for Article published in Wellcome Open Research (Appendices 1,2 & 3). 

Abstract of Article: 

Background: Timely diagnosis of dementia is a policy priority in the United Kingdom (UK). Primary care physicians receive incentives to diagnose dementia; however, 33% of patients are still not receiving a diagnosis. We explored automating early detection of dementia using data from patients’ electronic health records (EHRs). We investigated: a) how early a machine-learning model could accurately identify dementia before the physician; b) if models could be tuned for dementia subtype; and c) what the best clinical features were for achieving detection.

Methods: Using EHRs from Clinical Practice Research Datalink in a case-control design, we selected patients aged >65y with a diagnosis of dementia recorded 2000-2012 (cases) and matched them 1:1 to controls; we also identified subsets of Alzheimer’s and vascular dementia patients. Using 77 coded concepts recorded in the 5 years before diagnosis, we trained random forest classifiers, and evaluated models using Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC). We examined models by year prior to diagnosis, subtype, and the most important features contributing to classification.

Results: 95,202 patients (median age 83y; 64.8% female) were included (50% dementia cases). Classification of dementia cases and controls was poor 2-5 years prior to physician-recorded diagnosis (AUC range 0.55-0.65) but good in the year before (AUC: 0.84). Features indicating increasing cognitive and physical frailty dominated models 2-5 years before diagnosis; in the final year, initiation of the dementia diagnostic pathway (symptoms, screening and referral) explained the sudden increase in accuracy. No substantial differences were seen between all-cause dementia and subtypes.

Conclusions: Automated detection of dementia earlier than the treating physician may be problematic, if using only primary care data. Future work should investigate more complex modelling, benefits of linking multiple sources of healthcare data and monitoring devices, or contextualising the algorithm to those cases that the GP would need to investigate.

Notes

Appendices and extended data linked to the main manuscript.

Files

Files (49.1 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:11512fdc249e60fc70f3b653afc719c3
20.3 kB Download
md5:7e332ee439cd03bce7f1aeb3a426e0f0
10.2 kB Download
md5:ca4afefe3be15324e33f30a19a00595a
18.6 kB Download

Additional details

Funding

Wellcome Trust
ASTRODEM: Using astrophysics to close the “diagnosis gap” for dementia in UK general practice 202133