Published May 20, 2020 | Version v1
Dataset Restricted

Dataset related to the article "An Ablation Index Operator-Independent Approach to Improve Efficacy in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation at 24-month Follow-Up: A Single Center Experience"

Description

This record contains raw data related to the article "An Ablation Index Operator-Independent Approach to Improve Efficacy in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation at 24-month Follow-Up: A Single Center Experience"

ABSTRACT

Purpose: Since the introduction of catheter ablation as a mainstream treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF), several technical improvements have been put forward. In this contest, Ablation Index (AI) is an accurate ablation quality marker by incorporating power, delivery time, contact force (CF), and catheter stability in a weighted formula. The aim of our study is to evaluate the efficacy of AI-guided AF ablation over 24 month follow-up.

Methods: We evaluated 72 consecutive patients with drug-refractory paroxysmal (66.7%) and early-persistent AF (33.3%) undergoing AI-guided ablation, compared to 72 propensity-matched control patients who underwent CF-guided procedure. All procedures were performed by three skilled operators. Data concerning procedural characteristics and long-term freedom from AF recurrence were analyzed.

Results: At 24-month follow-up, Kaplan-Meier curves of AF recurrence were significantly lower in AI group than in CF group (15.5% vs. 30.6%; p 0.042). These findings were confirmed in a sub analysis regardless of the continued use of antiarrhythmic drugs in the follow-up (42.2% in AI-guided group and 66.7% in CF-guided group, p 0.004). At 24-month follow-up, a positive trend in the decrease of arrhythmia recurrences was observed in AI-guided ablation for all operators.

Conclusions: AI-guided ablation results more effective than CF-guided ablation as demonstrated by a lower incidence of AF recurrences regardless of the use of antiarrhythmic drugs in the follow-up. Each operator seems to improve the long-term success using an AI-guided ablation, thus showing both the efficacy and the reproducibility of this approach.

 

Files

Restricted

The record is publicly accessible, but files are restricted. Log in to check if you have access.

Request access

If you would like to request access to these files, please fill out the form below.

You need to satisfy these conditions in order for this request to be accepted:

Please write your request to direzione.scientifica@ccfm.i

You are currently not logged in. Do you have an account? Log in here

Additional details

Related works

Is supplement to
Journal article: 10.1007/s10840-019-00587-y (DOI)