Science Governance and Scientometrics
Published October 20, 2016 | Version v1
Journal article Open

The method of evaluating the effectiveness of small innovative enterprises state support in Russia

Authors/Creators

Description

The article is devoted to the problem of an eficiency evaluation of government budget appropriations, directed to support small innovative entrepreneurship in Russia, which is a basic element of national innovative system. The small enterprises created in the late eighties of the XX century on base of research institutions and the higher education organisations, have used in the activities ready-made scientiic and technical developments of the founders. During the formation of small business support infrastructure in Russia, there was “the second wave” of creation of small enterprises, which were reoriented on carrying out independent researches and developments. However, despite the efforts being made by the government, their quantity has remained at extremely low level. The detailed analysis of inancial instruments of state support has allowed to reveal the problems that reduce eficiency of the small innovative entrepreneurship in Russia: 1) tools are addressed to all small business without speciics of innovative activities; 2) state support of the small innovative enterprises has no system character and is limited to separate actions; 3) there are no single criteria for evaluation of eficiency of the state support. Relevance and the practical importance of a subject of research have deined its purpose and tasks. The research purpose consists in eficiency increase of the small innovative enterprises state support; inancial mechanisms of state support are the object of research. Results of research include: 1) classiication of the small innovative enterprises according to their place and value in an innovative cycle; 2) differentiated approach to an eficiency evaluation of the small innovative enterprises state support depending on type of entrepreneurial behavior; 3) criteria for evaluation of eficiency of the small innovative enterprises state support correlated to the principles underlain in a basis of the differentiated approach; 4) system of evaluation criteria ranging according to entrepreneurial behavior type; 5) indicators system of an eficiency evaluation of the small innovative enterprises state support constituted according to evaluation criteria.

Files

The method of evaluating the effectiveness of small innovative enterprises state support in Russia. Parfenova, Gribovsky. 2016-4.pdf

Files (391.7 kB)

Additional details

References

  • MALYUGINA, A. (2012) The experience of state support of small and medium businesses in France. Abstract of PhD dissertation, World economy, The Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation (Financial University), Moscow, Russia.
  • SMAGULOVA, J., BISENOVA, R., AIDOSOVA, B. (2013) The role of small innovative enterprises in the modern economy. Modern high technologies. No. 12. P. 213–216.
  • GRIBOVSKY, A., USHAKOVA, S. (2014) Mechanisms of small innovative business state support abroad. Science. Innovations. Education. No. 16. P. 205–221.
  • ASAUL, A. (2008) Modernization of the economy based on technological innovation. Available from: http://www.aup.ru/books/m5/3_2.htm [Accessed: 10th July 2016].
  • BARANGOV, A., ELZATAYEVA, R. (2012) Small innovative enterprises in Russian universities. Bulletin of the Kalmyk University. No. 3. P. 97–101.
  • ZOLOTYKH, N. (2012) Policies to support innovation activities of small enterprises. Public hearings of the Information Technologies Industry Association together with the Commission on science and innovation of The Civic Chamber. Available from: http://www.apkit.ru/iles/OP_RF_Zolotikh.pdf [Accessed: 6th July 2016].
  • POLESHCHENKO, K., VERKHOGLYAD, E. (2011) Small innovative enterprises: features, classiication, institutionalization. Herald of Omsk university. No. 3. Available from: http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/malyeinnovatsionnye-predpriyatiya-osobennosti-klassiikatsiya-institualizatsi-ya [Accessed: 31th July 2016].
  • KUZNETSOVA, E., STEPANOV, M. (2011) Realization of practice-oriented approach in case of implementation of learning standards through the activity organization of the small innovative enterprises. Scientiic researches in education. No. 4. Available from: http://cyberleninka.ru/ article/n/realizatsiya-praktiko-orientirovannogo-podhoda-pri-vnedreniifgos-posredstvom-organizatsii-deyatelnosti-malyh-innovatsionnyh [Accessed: 31th July 2016].
  • MAZUR, E. (2005) Innovative entrepreneurship in small business structure in Ukraine. Economy of Ukraine. No. 3. P. 36–41.
  • SAFRONOV, M., ANISHCHENKO Yu. (2012) Small innovative enterprises: formation of a conceptual framework. Proc. of the All-Russian scientiic and practical conference of creative youth "Actual problems of aircraft and astronautics", Krasnoyarsk, Russia, 9–14 April 2012.
  • BOGACHYOVA, D. (2006) Strategy of development of small innovative entrepreneurship as object of public administration. Abstract of PhD dissertation, National economy management, The Baltiс Academy for Tourism and Entrepreneurship, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
  • SHKURATOV, S. (2006) Reasons for the choice of strategy of the small innovative enterprise development on the basis of matrix model. Abstract of PhD dissertation, National economy management, State University of Management, Moscow, Russia.
  • EFIMTSEVA, T. (2013) Legal status of the small innovative enterprises: problems of determination and ixing. Business law. No. 2. P. 28–32.
  • PTASHNIK, V. (2008) Small innovative enterprises. Abstract of PhD dissertation, National economy management, Moscow State University of Mechanical Engineering (MAMI), Moscow, Russia.
  • MATVEEV, S., ROMANOVICH, L., BABAYEV V. et al. (2002–2006) Small innovative enterprise step by step (methodical recommendations). Available from: http://www.bstu.ru/research/innovations/mip [Accessed: 15th July 2016].
  • GRIBOVSKY, A. (2015) Public inancial support for research and development in small business in Russia: analysis of the current state and proposals for the increase of its effectiveness. Science. Innovations. Education. No. 18. P. 91–110.
  • TODOSIYCHUK, A. (2011) State regulation and stimulation of small and average innovative entrepreneurship. Innovations. No. 3. P. 26–37.
  • FILATOV, E. (2014) The role and the place of the small innovative enterprises in national economy. Economics and innovations management. No. 12. Available from: http://ekonomika.snauka.ru/2014/12/6813 [Accessed: 1st July 2016].
  • ANISHCHENKO, YU., RAGOZINA, M., SAFRONOV, M. (2015) The technique of an estimation of small innovative enterprises activity eficiency. Fundamental research. No. 9–1. P. 106–110.
  • OBUKHOVA, E. (2015) Features of creation of the small innovative enterprises in case of higher education institutions in modern Russian conditions. Siberian inancial school. No. 3. P. 31–36. Available from: URL: http://journal.safbd.ru/sites/default/iles/articles/journal_sfs_safbd_2015-3.31-36.pdf [Accessed: 5th July 2016].
  • LEBEDEVA, E. (2008) Features of innovative activity of small business enterprises. Human. Community. Management. No. 3. P. 43–48. Available from: http://chsu.kubsu.ru/arhiv/2008_3/2008_3_Lebedeva. pdf [Accessed: 11th July 2016].
  • IVANOV, Y. (2013) Foreign experience of innovative development of small business. Young scientist. No. 12. P. 306–308. Available from: http://moluch.ru/archive/59/8018/ [Accessed: 11th July 2016].
  • SHESTAKOV, V. (2014) Features and obstacles of development of the Russian small innovative enterprises. Creative economy. No. 11. P. 155–161. Available from: http://bgscience.ru/lib/5207/ [Accessed: 11th July 2016].