Science Governance and Scientometrics
Published February 28, 2020 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Assessment of the Possibilities of Achieving the Planned Values of Gross Expenditures on Research and Development in Russia

Description

Introduction. Leadership in research and development and a high rate of mastery of new knowledge and creation of innovative products are key factors that determine the competitiveness of national economies and the effectiveness of national security strategies. In this regard, research on the possibilities of achieving the target values of the indicator of gross expenditures on research and development becomes especially relevant. Methods. For research purposes, such scientific methods as analysis, synthesis, generalization, induction, comparison and formalization were used, as well as methods of comparative, statistical and economic analysis. Results and Discussion. The article analyzes the dynamics and structure of one of the most common indicators that allow us to evaluate the country’s scientific and technological development: the indicator of domestic expenditures for research and development. The transformation of goal-setting that has been carried out in relation to the development of science within the framework of strategic planning has been revealed: a shift in emphasis from the quantitative determination of established absolute values to relative values, making it possible to evaluate not only the dynamics, but also the structural changes in the observed phenomenon. The impossibility of achieving the established values of the target indicator of the development of science in the presence of existing trends in its financing is shown. Conclusion. The results of the research can be used in the interests of the Ministry of Economic Development and the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation.

Notes

For citation: Dmitrishina EV, Uskov DA, Mikhaylova AA, Fedorova ES. Assessment of the Possibilities of Achieving the Planned Values of Gross Expenditures on Research and Development in Russia. Science Governance and Scientometrics. 2020; 15(1):8-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33873/2686-6706.2020.15-1.8-29

Files

Assessment of the Possibilities of Achieving the Planned Values of Gross Expenditures on Research and Development. Dmitrishina, Uskov, Mikhaylova, Fedorova.2020-1.pdf

Files (413.9 kB)

Additional details

References

  • Shah A, Boadway R. Fiscal federalism: Principles and practices of multiorder governance. Journal of Economic Literature. 2010; 48(3):766-769. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/20778770
  • Kudrin A, Sokolov I. Fiscal maneuver and restructuring the Russian economy. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2017; 9:5-27. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2017-11-5-32 (In Russ.)
  • Kudrin A, Knobel A. A fiscal policy as a source of economic growth. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2017; 10:5-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8 736-2017-10-5-26 (In Russ.)
  • Lenchuk EB, Filatov VI. Strategic planning as a tool to overcome Russia's technological backwardness. World of the New Economy. 2019; 13(2):32-42. DOI: 10.26794/2220-6469-2019-13-2-32-42 (In Russ.)
  • Filatov VI, Dorzhieva VV. Strategic planning as a tool for sustainable scientific, technological and industrial development of regions. Federalism. 2018; 4:153-167. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36729519 (accessed: 15.11.2019). (In Russ.)
  • Idrisov GI, Knyaginin VN, Kudrin AL, Rozhkov ES. A new technological revolution: challenges and opportunities for Russia. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2018; 4:5-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2018-4-5-25 (In Russ.)
  • Dmitrishina EV, Uskov DA, Yagovkina VA, Mikhaylova AA. Peculiarities of financial provision for the implementation of state programs with scientific and technical components. European Research Studies Journal. 2018; 21(1):614-623. URL: https://www.ersj.eu/journal/974 (accessed: 15.11.2019).
  • Klimanov VV, Budaeva KV, Chernyshova NA. Interim results of strategic planning in the regions of Russia. Economic Policy. 2017; 5:104-127. URL: http://ecpolicy.ru/images/stories/2017_5/008_klimanov.pdf (accessed: 15.11.2019). (In Russ.)
  • Budaeva KV, Klimanov VV. Content and retrospective analysis of regional strategizing in Russia. Regional Research of Russia. 2016; 6(2):175-183. URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/ S2079970516020027 (accessed: 15.11.2019).
  • Dmitrishina E, Uskov D. Management issues of government programs implementation through the example of the Russian Federation government program "Development of Science and Technology" for the period of 2013–2020. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education. 2016; 18:12431-12447. URL: http://www.ijese.net/ makale/1698 (accessed: 15.11.2019).
  • Dmitrishina E, Uskov D. The issues of covering science and technical policy of modern Russia in the strategic planning documents. European Research Studies Journal. 2015; 18(4):57-74. URL: https://www.ersj.eu/ journal/478 (accessed: 15.11.2019).
  • Mikhaylova AA, Uskov DA. Science funding in Russia: problems and prospects. Finance. 2017; 1:14-18. URL: http://www.finance-journal.ru/index.php?part=finance&num=201701 (accessed: 15.11.2019). (In Russ.)
  • Klimanov VV, Safina AI. Variability in strategic planning documents in the country. Management and Business Administration. 2017; 1:46-65. URL: http://www.mba-journal.ru/archive/2017/1/ (accessed: 15.11.2019). (In Russ.)