Planned intervention: On Wednesday April 3rd 05:30 UTC Zenodo will be unavailable for up to 2-10 minutes to perform a storage cluster upgrade.
Published November 14, 2018 | Version Accepted manuscript
Journal article Open

Similar cranial trauma prevalence among Neanderthals and Upper Palaeolithic modern humans

  • 1. Paleoanthropology, Senckenberg Centre for Human Evolution and Palaeoenvironment, University of Tübingen
  • 2. Animal Evolutionary Ecology Group, Institute of Evolution and Ecology, University of Tübingen
  • 3. Paleoanthropology, Senckenberg Centre for Human Evolution and Palaeoenvironment, University of Tübingen. State Office for Cultural Heritage Management Baden-Württemberg, Osteology
  • 4. Paleoanthropology, Senckenberg Centre for Human Evolution and Palaeoenvironment, University of Tübingen. DFG Center for Advanced Studies 'Words, Bones, Genes, Tools', University of Tübingen

Description

Neanderthals are commonly depicted as leading dangerous lives and permanently struggling for survival. This view largely relies on the high incidences of trauma that have been reported and have variously been attributed to violent social behaviour, highly mobile hunter-gatherer lifestyles or attacks by carnivores. The described Neanderthal pattern of predominantly cranial injuries is further thought to reflect violent encounters with large prey mammals, resulting from the use of close-range hunting weapons. These interpretations directly shape our understanding of Neanderthal lifestyles, health and hunting abilities, yet mainly rest on descriptive, case-based evidence. Quantitative, population-level studies of traumatic injuries are rare. Here we reassess the hypothesis of higher cranial trauma prevalence among Neanderthals using a population-level approach—accounting for preservation bias and other contextual data—and an exhaustive fossil database. We show that Neanderthals and early Upper Palaeolithic anatomically modern humans exhibit similar overall incidences of cranial trauma, which are higher for males in both taxa, consistent with patterns shown by later populations of modern humans. Beyond these similarities, we observed species-specific, age-related variation in trauma prevalence, suggesting that there were differences in the timing of injuries during life or that there was a differential mortality risk of trauma survivors in the two groups. Finally, our results highlight the importance of preservation bias in studies of trauma prevalence.

Files

Beier et al 2018_Preprint.pdf

Files (58.7 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:238819b160a98514384194214e762f0d
58.7 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Funding

CROSSROADS – Human Evolution at the Crossroads 724703
European Commission