Planned intervention: On Wednesday April 3rd 05:30 UTC Zenodo will be unavailable for up to 2-10 minutes to perform a storage cluster upgrade.
Published October 4, 2019 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Whose tent are we in? : The value of fundamental criticism in, of, and for sociology

  • 1. Cornell University

Description

This paper discusses a subject that has become increasingly delicate in recent years
in sociology and related fields and subfields, including ethnomethodology and conversation
analysis. The subject is criticism, particularly criticism of academic
tendencies and trends that are uncomfortably close to home. A portion of Wes Sharrock’s
voluminous body of writings is critical of attempts to turn vernacular expressions
into stable scientific concepts. Following Peter Winch, such conceptual criticism
extends to ‘the very idea’ of a social science, and following ethnomethodology
it re-examines the project of converting indexical expressions to formal analytical
instruments and objects. Not surprisingly, such criticism sometimes stirs strong and
indignant reactions and is shunned for being counterproductive. This paper discusses
rationales for this mode of criticism and presents two examples of conceptual
confusions that arise from ignoring the point of such criticism: one has to do with
efforts to treat motives as an explanatory factor in social research, and the other
has to do with efforts to use quantitative analysis to ‘test’ a ‘hypothesis’ about the
systematic uses of apologies in conversation.

Notes

+ Sprache: eng.

Files

05 Lynch.pdf

Files (253.4 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:edda4408501e0b21ba33a0ca2b67240b
253.4 kB Preview Download