There is a newer version of the record available.

Published October 27, 2026 | Version 2.45

The Cosmochrony Research Programme: A Structural Roadmap and Paper Inventory

Authors/Creators

  • 1. Independent Researcher

Description

The Cosmochrony programme develops a pre-geometric framework in which physical structure — spacetime, quantum mechanics, gauge symmetry, and Standard Model observables — arises from a single primitive: the local structure of admissible non-injective transitions between observable states. The corpus comprises 116 papers across three theory branches. Branch I (Foundation track) develops four admissibility axioms and their consequences. A finite \(S_3\) countermodel proves that the algebraic properties extracted from those axioms do not force a central commutator, a finite Heisenberg group, or a Weil representation. The Heisenberg/Weil carrier is therefore a supplied realisation, not an axiomatic theorem. Branch II (O-series) develops the spectral admissibility sub-programme, studies the conjugate-pair fibre structure on a supplied Weil model and measures its capacity exponent $\delta_{\mathrm{pair}}$. The native Heisenberg span-growth law proves that the proposed conversion $\delta_{\mathrm{pair}} \to \beta^*$ has no derived carrier on the measurement substrate; its numerical agreement with the charged-lepton hierarchy remains a phenomenological coincidence check rather than a structural derivation. The colour factor and the complete Standard Model gauge group are open: O31 version 2.0 supplies neither. Branch III (Q-series and companion papers) develops spacetime geometry and gauge dynamics from the Branch I axioms and supplied Branch II spectral data, and states a universal singlet correlator conditional on an explicit, undemonstrated invariance hypothesis (paper Q3; the Born rule remains open), a conditional effective co-metric of rank three whose non-degenerate block is Lorentzian, under the open inputs [H-L], [H-lift] and [H-hyp] (the full-rank extension and every coefficient value remain open); and the conditions for an Einstein ($a_2$) sector and the derivation of the local Yang–Mills ($a_4$) sector from a single spectral-entropy functional on a supplied metric, conditional on supplied renormalized matching data (papers Q12–Q13). This paper provides a complete inventory, a logical dependency map, and a structured account of what is proved, structural, heuristic, or open, intended both as an entry point for external readers and as an internal navigation reference. Interpretive status. The programme's unifying reading — that physical structure is organised by admissibility and by spectral (Seeley–DeWitt) order rather than by an enlarged symmetry group — is offered as an interpretive outlook, not a theorem; each individual result carries the epistemic label (proved, structural, heuristic, or open) recorded in the inventory below.

Notes

Version 2.45 records the I-3 correction in Foundation 2.6 and its consumers NIF-Note 1.6, Q6a 2.5, FM-Note 3.3, Q5a 3.3, Q5b 2.3, Q14 3.3, E2 2.3, Gravity 3.6, SG-Note 2.4 and QS-Note 2.3; the consumers no longer state that the admissibility axioms force irreducibility or that A3 is a non-factorisability axiom. In Gravity and SG-Note the coherence extensivity hypothesis H-ext stays explicit and distinct from the sector reading. Irreducibility of the admissible fibre follows from A1 and A3 and a representation-theoretic dictionary only under an additional sector reading of A3, not derived, on which a generator-stable decomposition counts as premature selection. The discreteness of quantum transitions is postulated by A4, not derived: on the supplied Heisenberg shell realisation a realised saturation depth is an integer (O22), and the existence of such a depth is not established. The Projective Observability Principle is an adopted principle, not a consequence of A1-A4, and the physical reality of the proto-state and the revelation reading of the projection are interpretive readings. The white-paper entry states that the white paper proposes the substrate chi and the relaxation mechanism and that Foundation derives neither from A1-A4. The HeisenbergStructure entry states that the non-factorisability lemma formalises A3 only under a reading that is not derived. The consumer entries, table rows, graph nodes and bibliography notes are aligned. These corrections close the attributions to Foundation; the existence of a locking depth and the status of O22's own integrality argument remain open.

Files

program.pdf

Files (953.7 kB)

Name Size
md5:5dcf716c83f90ac3245538cdacf5844b
953.7 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Related works