Proceedings of the International Naval Engineering Conference & Exhibition (INEC)
Published October 3, 2018 | Version v1
Conference paper Open

Selection of Standards in Naval Programmes: Harmonising Classification Rules with Commercial and Military Standards

Authors/Creators

  • 1. The Science and Technology Corporation for the Development of the Naval, Maritime and Riverine Industries (COTECMAR), Design & Engineering Management Office, Colombia

Description

This paper presents the findings of an extensive literature review conducted by the authors to elucidate the main aspects to be considered in the selection of rules, standards, and regulations in Naval Projects, as the difference between military and commercial standards, the implications of the use of COTS, and the close relationship between the standards and requirements. Finally, some insights and lessons learned from the harmonisation process carried out by for the design process of the Colombian Navy warships are provided. 

Files

INEC 2018 Paper 036 Salas Berrocal SDG FINAL.pdf

Files (3.5 MB)

Additional details

References

  • Aitken, A., Jones, S., 2007. What price navalisation in military support ships? Presented at the Military Support Ships, RINA, Londres, pp. 62–63.
  • Arena, M.V., Blickstein, I., Grammich, C.A., Younossi, O., 2006. Why Has the Cost of Navy Ships Risen?: A Macroscopic Examination of the Trends in U.S. Naval Ship Costs Over the Past Several Decades. Rand Corporation.
  • Ashe, G.M., Finney, R.R., Gabel, D.G., 2007. Naval Vessel Rules: Taking Naval Ship Classification to a New Plateau. Discussion. Transactions of the Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers 115, 207–223.
  • Barker, C.F., Campbell, C.B., 2000. Risk Management in Total System Ship Design. Naval Engineers Journal 112, 355–365. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-3584.2000.tb03342.x
  • Cathcart, T., Fowler, K., Tyler, D., 2010. 6. Systems Engineering in Military Projects, in: Mission-Critical and Safety-Critical Systems Handbook - Design and Development for Embedded Applications. Elservier, Newnes, p. 25.
  • Curry, R., Ashe, G., Novak, D.S., 2002. Applicability of High Speed Craft and High Speed Naval Craft Classification Rules to Current Mission Requirements. Journal of Ship Production 18, 208–215.
  • Delpizzo, R.D., Valluri, S., 2017. An Introduction to NATO Standard ANEP (Allied Naval Engineering Publication) 77 and Its Application to Naval Ships. Ciencia y tecnología de buques 11, 75–88. https://doi.org/10.25043/19098642.153
  • Dhingra, C.P., Nara, S., 2006. Convergence and divergence between MILS and COTS standards "Commercial Off The Shelf (COTS) equipment" - An EMC perspective, in: 2006 9th International Conference on Electromagnetic Interference and Compatibility (INCEMIC 2006). Presented at the 2006 9th International Conference on Electromagnetic Interference and Compatibility (INCEMIC 2006), pp. 181–188.
  • European Committee for standardisation (CEN), 2005. Recommendations issued by Expert Group 7 "Electromagnetic environment" on their selection of standards (Report of the CEN WS 10 EG7 "Electromagnetic environment" No. CEN/WS10/EG7/N051). European Commitee for Standardisation.
  • Hoppe, H., 2005. Goal-based standards. WMU J Marit Affairs 4, 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03195072 International Maritime Organization, 2015. International Goal-Based Ship Construction Standards for Bulk Carriers and Oil Tankers.
  • Leersum, B.J.A.M. van, Ven, C.C.J. van der, Bergsma, J.G., Leferink, F.B.J., 2013. Design of complex naval installations and the limitations of equipment standards, in: 2013 Asia-Pacific Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility (APEMC). Presented at the 2013 Asia-Pacific Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility (APEMC), pp. 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/APEMC.2013.7360645
  • Lloyd's Register Marine, 2014. Naval ship safety assurance - Guidance for navies and shipbuilders.
  • Lorell, M.A., Drezner, J.A., Lowell, J.F., 2001. Reforming Mil-Specs (Documented briefings). RAND Corporation.
  • Martin, A.A., 2007. Survivability and the affordable warship, in: The Affordable Warship. Presented at the RINA Warship 2007, RINA, Bath, United Kingdom.
  • NATO, 2014. Naval Ship Code (ANEP-77), F, ver. 1. ed. NATO Standardization Office (NSO), Brussels.
  • O'Rourke, R., 2017. Navy LX(R) Amphibious Ship Program: Background and Issues for Congress.
  • Penny, J., Eaton, A., Bishop, P.G., Bloomfield, R.E., 2001. The Practicalities of Goal-Based Safety Regulation, in: Aspects of Safety Management. Springer, London, pp. 35–48.
  • Pierce, J.D., 2009. Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) requirements for Military and Commercial Equipment (Masters Thesis). Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California.
  • Post, R., 2003. Affordability & flexibility in Naval patrol vessels. Naval Forces; Aldershot 24, 130–131.
  • Schank, J.F., Arena, M.V., Kamarck, K.., Lee, G.T., Birkler, J., Murphy, R.E., Lough, R., 2014. Keeping Major Naval Ship Acquisitions on Course - Key Considerations for Managing Australia's SEA 5000 Future Frigate Program. RAND Corporation.
  • Scott, R., Grace, J., 2013. USN looks at commercial specs for LX(R) amphibious ship. Jane's Navy International; Coulsdon 118.
  • Thornton, J.S., Courts, M.D., Robb, M., 2007. Making warship survivability affordable, in: The Affordable Warship. Presented at the RINA Warship 2007, RINA, Bath, United Kingdom.
  • Tupper, E.C., 2013. 2. Definition and Regulation, in: Introduction to Naval Architecture. Elservier, Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford, p. 24.
  • von Oldershausen, C., 2014. Naval Ship Code - Challenge or benefit for the navies of the world?