How does varying the number of intermediate tasks (e.g., 3 vs. 9) affect zero-shot cross-lingual transfer performance on XTREME-R
Description
Intermediate-task training---fine-tuning a pretrained model on an intermediate task before fine-tuning again on the target task---often improves model performance substantially on language understanding tasks in monolingual English settings. We investigate whether English intermediate-task training is still helpful on non-English target tasks. Using nine intermediate language-understanding tasks, we evaluate intermediate-task transfer in a zero-shot cross-lingual setting on the XTREME benchmark. We see large improvements from intermediate training on the BUCC and Tatoeba sentence retrieval tas
Research goal: How does varying the number of intermediate tasks (e.g., 3 vs. 9) affect zero-shot cross-lingual transfer performance on XTREME-R when trained with 100K samples per task?
Autonomous synthesis report generated by Assignee Research. Tribunal consensus score: 7.7/10.
Notes
Files
paper.pdf
Files
(81.4 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:b186d7ecf5d53f7d265bacba60b4d56e
|
81.4 kB | Preview Download |