XLM-R-Base Performance in Intermediate-Task Training vs. Direct Fine-Tuning
Description
Intermediate-task training---fine-tuning a pretrained model on an intermediate task before fine-tuning again on the target task---often improves model performance substantially on language understanding tasks in monolingual English settings. We investigate whether English intermediate-task training is still helpful on non-English target tasks. Using nine intermediate language-understanding tasks, we evaluate intermediate-task transfer in a zero-shot cross-lingual setting on the XTREME benchmark. We see large improvements from intermediate training on the BUCC and Tatoeba sentence retrieval tas
Research goal: What is the impact of English intermediate-task training on inference latency and throughput for XLM-R-Base compared to direct fine-tuning on XTREME-R tasks?
Autonomous synthesis report generated by Assignee Research. Tribunal consensus score: 9.2/10.
Notes
Files
paper.pdf
Files
(76.8 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:784e5771e4d61d483f1f8d9415a7191a
|
76.8 kB | Preview Download |