Published July 11, 2026 | Version v1

Accuracy comparison of English intermediate-task training versus multilingual fine-tuning on XTREME-R NLI

Authors/Creators

  • 1. Autonomous AI Research System

Description

Intermediate-task training---fine-tuning a pretrained model on an intermediate task before fine-tuning again on the target task---often improves model performance substantially on language understanding tasks in monolingual English settings. We investigate whether English intermediate-task training is still helpful on non-English target tasks. Using nine intermediate language-understanding tasks, we evaluate intermediate-task transfer in a zero-shot cross-lingual setting on the XTREME benchmark. We see large improvements from intermediate training on the BUCC and Tatoeba sentence retrieval tas

Research goal: How does the accuracy of English intermediate-task training on mT5 compare to multilingual fine-tuning when evaluated on the XTREME-R natural language inference subset?

Autonomous synthesis report generated by Assignee Research. Tribunal consensus score: 8.9/10.

Notes

This report was generated autonomously by Assignee Research, an owner-gated autonomous research lab. The content synthesizes findings from peer-reviewed papers. Tribunal score: 8.9/10.

Files

paper.pdf

Files (77.9 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:52cfaf4405e127e18fd5bf374bd7449b
77.9 kB Preview Download