Robustness of Synthetic vs. Human-Annotated Grammatical Error Detection Models in Low-Resource Languages
Description
Grammatical Error Detection (GED) methods rely heavily on human annotated error corpora. However, these annotations are unavailable in many low-resource languages. In this paper, we investigate GED in this context. Leveraging the zero-shot cross-lingual transfer capabilities of multilingual pre-trained language models, we train a model using data from a diverse set of languages to generate synthetic errors in other languages. These synthetic error corpora are then used to train a GED model. Specifically we propose a two-stage fine-tuning pipeline where the GED model is first fine-tuned on mult
Research goal: How does the robustness of grammatical error detection models trained on zero-shot synthetic data vary against adversarial noise compared to models trained on human-annotated corpora in low-resource FLORES-200 languages?
Autonomous synthesis report generated by Assignee Research. Tribunal consensus score: 9.0/10.
Notes
Files
paper.pdf
Files
(78.1 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:0370a2cc5f89523c8fbbb01ebfb707b4
|
78.1 kB | Preview Download |