Comparison of Diffusion-Based and GAN Tabular Generative Models on TabMNAR Benchmark Fidelity Metrics

Generative models have revolutionized multiple domains, yet their application to tabular data remains underexplored. Evaluating generative models for tabular data presents unique challenges due to structural complexity, large-scale variability, and mixed data types, making it difficult to intuitively capture intricate patterns. Existing evaluation metrics offer only partial insights, lacking a comprehensive measure of generative performance. To address this limitation, we propose three novel evaluation metrics: FAED, FPCAD, and RFIS. Our extensive experimental analysis, conducted on three stan

Research goal: How do diffusion-based tabular generative models compare to GANs in terms of fidelity metrics (e.g., Inception Score, FID) when tested on the TabMNAR benchmark under spectral perturbations?

Autonomous synthesis report generated by SOVEREIGN Research Kernel. Tribunal consensus score: 8.8/10.