Published February 11, 2026 | Version v1
Journal article Open

A novel set of ultraconserved element probes for lacewings and allies (Insecta: Neuropterida)

Description

Assmar, Alice C, Khouri, Ziad, Machado, Renato J P, Gillung, Jessica P (2026): A novel set of ultraconserved element probes for lacewings and allies (Insecta: Neuropterida). Insect Systematics and Diversity 10 (1): 1-14, DOI: 10.1093/isd/ixag004, URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/isd/ixag004

Files

source.pdf

Files (3.8 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:8d67e5f9c84720f759b9a450b6e3c129
3.8 MB Preview Download

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:8D67FFF9C847FFF7FFB9A450FFE3C129
URL
http://publication.plazi.org/id/8D67FFF9C847FFF7FFB9A450FFE3C129

References

  • Alexander A. 2018. comparing_monolithic_UCE_fastas v0.2 [Software]. https://github.com/laninsky/comparing_monolithic_UCE_fastas
  • Andrews S. 2023. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data [Software]. https://www.bioinformatics.babraham. ac.uk/projects/fastqc/
  • Ardila-Camacho A, Martins CC, Aspock U, et al. 2021. Comparative morphology of extant raptorial Mantispoidea (Neuroptera: Mantispidae, Rhachiberothidae) suggests a non-monophyletic Mantispidae and a single origin of the raptorial condition within the superfamily. Zootaxa 4992:1-89. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4992.1.1
  • Aspock U. 2002. Phylogeny of the Neuropterida (Insecta: Holometabola). Zool. Scr. 31:51-55.https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0300-3256.2001.00087.x
  • Baca SM, Alexander A, Gustafson GT, et al. 2017. Ultraconserved elements show utility in phylogenetic inference of Adephaga (Coleoptera) and suggest paraphyly of "Hydradephaga." Syst. Entomol. 42:786-795. https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12244
  • Baca SM, Gustafson GT, DeRaad DA, et al. 2025. A shallow-scale phylogenomics approach reveals repeated patterns of diversification among sympatric lineages of cryptic Neotropical aquatic beetles (Coleoptera: Noteridae). Syst. Entomol. 50:82-101. https://doi. org/10.1111/syen.12643
  • Bejerano G, Pheasant M, Makunin I, et al. 2004. Ultraconserved elements in the human genome. Science 304:1321-1325. https://doi. org/10.1126/science.1098119
  • Blaimer BB, Brady SG, Schultz TR, et al. 2015. Phylogenomic methods outperform traditional multi-locus approaches in resolving deep evolutionary history: a case study of formicine ants. BMC Evol. Biol. 15:271. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-015-0552-5
  • Blaimer BB, Lloyd MW, Guillory WX, et al. 2016. Sequence capture and phylogenetic utility of genomic ultraconserved elements obtained from pinned insect specimens. PLoS One. 11:e0161531. https://doi. org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161531
  • Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114-2120. https:// doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170
  • Borowiec ML. 2016. AMAS: a fast tool for alignment manipulation and computing of summary statistics. PeerJ. 4:e1660. https://doi. org/10.7717/peerj.1660
  • Branstetter MG, Longino JT, Ward PS, et al. 2017. Enriching the ant tree of life: enhanced UCE bait set for genome- scale phylogenetics of ants and other Hymenoptera. Methods Ecol. Evol. 8:768-776. https:// doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12742
  • Broad GR, Crowley LM, McCulloch J; Darwin Tree of Life Consortium. 2023. The genome sequence of the Black Spongefly, Sisyra nigra (Retzius, 1783).Wellcome Open Res. 8:511.https://doi.org/10.12688/ wellcomeopenres.20295.1
  • Buenaventura E, Lloyd MW, Perilla Lopez JM, et al. 2021. Protein- encoding ultraconserved elements provide a new phylogenomic perspective of Oestroidea flies (Diptera: Calyptratae). Syst. Entomol. 46:5-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12443
  • Castresana J. 2000. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17:540-552. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026334
  • Cock PJA, Antao T, Chang JT, et al. 2009. Biopython: freely available Python tools for computational molecular biology and bioinformatics. Bioinformatics 25:1422-1423.https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp163
  • Danecek P, Bonfield JK, Liddle J, et al. 2021. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. Gigascience. 10:giab008. https://doi.org/10.1093/ gigascience/giab008
  • Derkarabetian S, Benavides LR, Giribet G. 2019. Sequence capture phylogenomics of historical ethanol-preserved museum specimens: unlocking the rest of the vault. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 19:1531-1544. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13072
  • Derkarabetian S, Lord A, Angier K, et al. 2025. Covering all bases: a universal metazoan UCE probe set to democratize phylogenomics. Genome Biol. Evol. 17:1-11. https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evaf193
  • Engel MS, Winterton SL, Breitkreuz LCV. 2018. Phylogeny and evolution of neuropterida: where have wings of lace taken us? Annu. Rev. Entomol.63:531-551.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-020117-043127
  • Faircloth BC, McCormack JE, Crawford NG, et al. 2012. Ultraconserved elements anchor thousands of genetic markers spanning multiple evolutionary timescales. Syst. Biol. 61:717-726. https://doi.org/ 10.1093/sysbio/sys004
  • Faircloth BC. 2016a. PHYLUCE is a software package for the analysis of conserved genomic loci. Bioinformatics 32:786-788. https://doi. org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btv646
  • Faircloth BC. 2016b. PHYLUCE: software for UCE (and general) phylogenomics. Phyluce Softw. UCE Gen. Phylogenomics. https://phyluce.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
  • Faircloth BC. 2017. Identifying conserved genomic elements and designing universal bait sets to enrich them. Methods Ecol. Evol. 8:1103-1112. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12754
  • Faircloth BC, Branstetter MG, White ND, et al. 2015. Target enrichment of ultraconserved elements from arthropods provides a genomic perspective on relationships among Hymenoptera. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 15:489-501. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12328
  • Freitas FV, Branstetter MG, Franceschini-Santos VH, et al. 2023. UCE phylogenomics, biogeography, and classification of long-horned bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Eucerini), with insights on using specimens with extremely degraded DNA. Insect Syst. Divers. 7:3. https://doi. org/10.1093/isd/ixad012
  • Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, et al. 2013. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29:1072-1075. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086
  • Gustafson GT, Alexander A, Sproul JS, et al. 2019. Ultraconserved element (UCE) probe set design: base genome and initial design parameters critical for optimization. Ecol. Evol. 9:6933-6948. https://doi. org/10.1002/ece3.5260
  • Gustafson GT, Baca SM, Alexander A, et al. 2020. Phylogenomic analysis of the beetle suborder Adephaga with comparison of tailored and generalized ultraconserved element probe performance. Syst. Entomol. 45:552-570. https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12413
  • Gustafson GT, Glynn RD, Short AEZ, et al. 2023. To design, or not to design? Comparison of beetle ultraconserved element probe set utility based on phylogenetic distance, breadth, and method of probe design. Insect Syst. Divers. 7:4. https://doi.org/10.1093/ isd/ixad014
  • Haring E, Aspock U. 2004. Phylogeny of the Neuropterida: a first molecular approach: phylogeny of the Neuropterida. Syst. Entomol. 29:415-430. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0307-6970.2004. 00263.x
  • Hellemans S, Wang M, Hasegawa N, et al. 2022. Using ultraconserved elements to reconstruct the termite tree of life.Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 173:107520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2022.107520
  • Hoang DT, Chernomor O, Von Haeseler A, et al. 2018. UFBoot2: improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35:518-522. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msx281
  • Huang W, Li L, Myers JR, et al. 2012. ART: a next-generation sequencing read simulator. Bioinformatics 28:593-594.https://doi.org/10.1093/ bioinformatics/btr708
  • Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TKF, et al. 2017. ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat. Methods. 14:587-589. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4285
  • Kapli P, Yang Z, Telford MJ. 2020. Phylogenetic tree building in the genomic age.Nat. Rev. Genet. 21:428-444.https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41576-020-0233-0
  • Katoh K, Standley DM. 2013. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability.Mol. Biol. Evol. 30:772-780. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst010
  • Lai Y, Du S, Li H, et al. 2025. Lacewing- specific universal single copy orthologs designed towards resolution of backbone phylogeny of Neuropterida. Syst. Entomol. 50:309-324. https://doi.org/10.1111/ syen.12657
  • Lunter G, Goodson M. 2011. Stampy: a statistical algorithm for sensitive and fast mapping of Illumina sequence reads. Genome Res. 21:936-939. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.111120.110
  • Machado RJP, Gillung JP, Winterton SL, et al. 2019. Owlflies are derived antlions: anchored phylogenomics supports a new phylogeny and classification of Myrmeleontidae (Neuroptera). Syst. Entomol. 44:418-450. https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12334
  • Minh BQ, Schmidt HA, Chernomor O, et al.2020. IQ-TREE 2: new models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era.Mol. Biol. Evol. 37:1530-1534. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msaa015
  • Misof B, Liu S, Meusemann K, et al. 2014. Phylogenomics resolves the timing and pattern of insect evolution.Science 346:763-767.https:// doi.org/10.1126/science.1257570
  • Nurk S, Bankevich A, Antipov D, et al. 2013. Assembling genomes and mini-metagenomes from highly chimeric reads. In: Deng M, Jiang R, Sun F, editors. Research in computational molecular biology. Vol. 7821. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. (Hutchison D, Kanade T, Kittler J, et al., editors. Lecture notes in computer science). p. 158-170. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37195-0_13
  • Oswald JD, Machado RJP. 2018. Biodiversity of the Neuropterida (Insecta:Neuroptera, Megaloptera, and Raphidioptera).In: Foottit RG, Adler PH, editors. Insect biodiversity. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. p. 627-672. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118945582.ch21
  • Prjibelski A, Antipov D, Meleshko D, et al. 2020. Using SPAdes De Novo Assembler. Curr. Protoc. Bioinformatics. 70:e102. https://doi. org/10.1002/cpbi.102
  • QIAGEN. 2014. QIAamp DNA Micro Handbook. qiagen.com. https:// www.qiagen.com/us/resources/resourcedetail?id=085e6418-1ec0-45f2- 89eb-62705f86f963&lang=en
  • Quinlan AR, Hall IM. 2010. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features.Bioinformatics 26:841-842.https://doi. org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq033
  • Saenz Manchola OF,Samaca Saenz E, Virrueta Herrera S, et al.2022.Mining ultraconserved elements from transcriptome and genome data to explore the phylogenomics of the free-living lice suborder Psocomorpha (Insecta: Psocodea). Insect Syst. Divers. 6:1. https://doi.org/10.1093/isd/ixac010
  • Simao FA, Waterhouse RM, Ioannidis P, et al. 2015. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics 31:3210-3212. https://doi.org/10.1093/ bioinformatics/btv351
  • Sota T, Takami Y, Ikeda H, et al. 2022. Global dispersal and diversification in ground beetles of the subfamily Carabinae. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 167:107355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2021.107355
  • Stevens HP, Winegar CV, Oakley AF, et al. 2025. Estimating the prevalence of images in the biology literature that are problematic for people with a color-vision deficiency.Colorblind Image Tester.https:// bioapps.byu.edu/colorblind_image_tester/.
  • Talavera G, Castresana J. 2007. Improvement of phylogenies after removing divergent and ambiguously aligned blocks from protein sequence alignments. Syst. Biol. 56:564-577. https://doi. org/10.1080/10635150701472164
  • Van Dam AR, Covas Orizondo JO, Lam AW, et al. 2022. Metagenomic clustering reveals microbial contamination as an essential consideration in ultraconserved element design for phylogenomics with insect museum specimens. Ecol. Evol 12:e8625. https://doi.org/10.1002/ ece3.8625
  • Van Dam MH, Henderson JB, Esposito L, et al. 2021. Genomic characterization and curation of UCEs improves species tree reconstruction. Syst. Biol. 70:307-321. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syaa063
  • Vasilikopoulos A, Misof B, Meusemann K, et al. 2020. An integrative phylogenomic approach to elucidate the evolutionary history and divergence times of Neuropterida (Insecta: Holometabola). BMC Evol. Biol. 20:64. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-020-01631-6
  • Wang Y, Liu X, Garzon- Orduna IJ, et al. 2017. Mitochondrial phylogenomics illuminates the evolutionary history of Neuropterida. Cladistics 33:617-636. https://doi.org/10.1111/cla.12186
  • Winterton SL, Hardy NB, Wiegmann BM. 2010. On wings of lace: phylogeny and Bayesian divergence time estimates of Neuropterida (Insecta) based on morphological and molecular data.Syst. Entomol. 35:349-378. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3113.2010.00521.x
  • Winterton SL, Lemmon AR, Gillung JP, et al. 2018. Evolution of lacewings and allied orders using anchored phylogenomics (Neuroptera, Megaloptera, Raphidioptera). Syst. Entomol. 43:330-354. https:// doi.org/10.1111/syen.12278
  • Yang Z, Rannala B. 2012. Molecular phylogenetics: principles and practice. Nat. Rev. Genet. 13:303-314. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3186
  • Young AD, Gillung JP. 2020. Phylogenomics -principles, opportunities and pitfalls of big- data phylogenetics. Syst. Entomol. 45:225-247. https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12406
  • Zhang F, Ding Y, Zhu CD, et al. 2019. Phylogenomics from low-coverage whole-genome sequencing. Methods Ecol. Evol. 10:507-517.https:// doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13145
  • Zhang R, Wang L, Tian S, et al. 2025. Inconsistent performance of multi- type genomic data in phylogenomics of neuropteridan insects, with solutions toward conflicting results. Syst. Entomol. Early 50:855-875. https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12684.
  • Zhao Y, Zhan Q, Wang Y, et al. 2025. Chromosome-level genome of the brown lacewing Micromus angulatus (Stephens, 1836) (Neuroptera: Hemerobiidae). Sci. Data. 12:394. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597- 025-04739-w