Published April 29, 2026 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Development of a spatio-temporal representation of agricultural landscapes as the modelling environment for spatially explicit agent-based models in the Animal Landscape and Man Simulation System (ALMaSS)

  • 1. Institute of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland|Institute of Geography and Spatial Management, Faculty of Geography and Geology, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland|Social-Ecological Systems Simulation Centre, Department of Agroecology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
  • 2. Institute of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland
  • 3. Social-Ecological Systems Simulation Centre, Department of Agroecology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark

Description

The model environment constitutes the core component of the Animal, Landscape, and Man Simulation System (ALMaSS). ALMaSS was developed to evaluate the effects of changes in landscape structure and management on key animal species within agroecosystems. Consequently, it is designed to work with representations of actual agricultural landscape areas, capturing both spatial and temporal landscape heterogeneity to fulfil the specific requirements of the ALMaSS species models.

This article presents the methodology for describing the land-use/land-cover of agricultural landscapes and generating detailed landscape representations for use in ALMaSS landscape simulations. We outline the external data requirements and data handling procedures necessary to prepare the final set of input files for an ALMaSS run. We provide a mapping algorithm to generate a landscape (land-use/land-cover) raster map and describe the methods for classifying and defining ALMaSS farm types and crop rotations. We present exemplary results and discuss potential applications beyond the ALMaSS modelling framework. Finally, we examine the ALMaSS landscape model generation process in the context of input data quality, accessibility, and data processing challenges and offer a perspective on future developments.

Files

AEM_article_167439.pdf

Files (7.2 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:ab4c80adf58b91da89cd2a133a0867a0
7.0 MB Preview Download
md5:0c2d92865d606f3ee807a370503a38a5
190.2 kB Preview Download

Linked records

Additional details

References

  • App M, Hellwig N, Schneider-Hohenbrink A-K, Burmeister J, Schröder B, Thiele J (2025) SyrFitSources: An agent-based model to investigate the effects of land use on the population dynamics of aphidophagous hoverflies. Ecological Modelling 507: 111098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111098
  • Bakker MM, Alam SJ, van Dijk J, Rounsevell MDA (2015) Land-use change arising from rural land exchange: an agent-based simulation model. Landscape Ecology 30: 273–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-014-0116-x
  • Becher MA, Grimm V, Thorbek P, Horn J, Kennedy PJ, Osborne JL (2014) Beehave: a systems model of honeybee colony dynamics and foraging to explore multifactorial causes of colony failure. Journal of Applied Ecology 51: 470–482. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12222
  • Becher MA, Twiston-Davies G, Penny TD, Goulson D, Rotheray EL, Osborne JL (2018) Bumble-BEEHAVE: a systems model for exploring multifactorial causes of bumblebee decline at individual, colony, population and community level. Journal of Applied Ecology 55: 2790–2801. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13165
  • Beckers V, Beckers J, Vanmaercke M, Van Hecke E, Van Rompaey A, Dendoncker N (2018) Modelling farm growth and its impact on agricultural land use: A country scale application of an agent-based model. Land 7(3): 109. https://doi.org/10.3390/land7030109
  • Bednarska AJ, Mikołajczyk Ł, Ziółkowska E, Kocjan K, Wnęk A, Mokkapati JS, Teper D, Kaczyński P, Łozowicka B, Śliwińska R, Laskowski R (2021) Effects of agricultural landscape structure, insecticide residues, and pollen diversity on the life-history traits of the red mason bee Osmia bicornis. The Science of the Total Environment 809: 151142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151142
  • Ghassemi B, Izquierdo-Verdiguier E, Verhegghen A, Yordanov M, Lemoine G, Martínez ÁM, De Marchi D, van der Velde M, Vuolo F, d'Andrimont R (2024) European Union crop map 2022: Earth observation's 10-meter dive into Europe's crop tapestry. Scientific Data 11: 1048. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-03884-y
  • Hoye TT, Skov F, Topping CJ (2012) Interpreting outputs of agent-based models using abundance-occupancy relationships. Ecological Indicators 20: 221–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.01.017
  • Jepsen JU, Topping CJ, Odderskær P, Andersen PN (2005) Evaluating consequences of land-use strategies on wildlife populations using multiple-species predictive scenarios. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 105: 581–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2004.08.007
  • Lefebvre M, Espinosa M, Gomez y Paloma S, Paracchini ML, Piorr A, Zasada I (2015) Agricultural landscapes as multi-scale public good and the role of the Common Agricultural Policy. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 58: 2088–2112. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2014.891975
  • Luke S, Cioffi-Revilla C, Panait L, Sullivan K, Balan G (2005) MASON: A multiagent simulation environment. Simulation 81(7): 517–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/0037549705058073
  • McLane AJ, Semeniuk C, McDermid GJ, Marceau DJ (2011) The role of agent-based models in wildlife ecology and management. Ecological Modelling 222: 1544–1556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.01.020
  • Mikołajczyk Ł, Laskowski R, Bednarska AJ, Ziółkowska E (2021) Species-specific landscape characterisation method in agro-ecosystems. Ecological Indicators 129: 107894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107894
  • Nilsson M, Zamparutti T, Petersen JE, Nykvist B, Rudberg P, McGuinn J (2012) Understanding policy coherence: Analytical framework and examples of sector–environment policy interactions in the EU. Environmental Policy and Governance 22: 395–423. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1589
  • North MJ, Collier NT, Vos JR (2006) Experiences creating three implementations of the Repast agent modeling toolkit. ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation 16(1): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1145/1122012.1122013
  • Pauli BP, McCann NP, Zollner PA, Cummings R, Gilbert JH, Gustafson EJ (2013) SEARCH: Spatially Explicit Animal Response to Composition of Habitat. PLOS ONE 8(5): e64656. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064656
  • Sowa G, Bednarska AJ, Ziółkowska E, Laskowski R (2022) Homogeneity of agriculture landscape promotes insecticide resistance in the ground beetle Poecilus cupreus. PLOS ONE 17(4): e0266453. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266453
  • Sullivan K, Coletti M, Luke S (2010) GeoMason: Geospatial support for MASON. Technical Report. Dept. of CS, George Mason University.
  • Taillandier P, Gaudou B, Grignard A, Huynh Q-N, Marilleau N, Caillou P, Philippon D, Drogoul A (2019) Building, composing and experimenting complex spatial models with the GAMA platform. Geoinformatica 23: 299–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10707-018-00339-6
  • Tang W, Bennett DA (2010) The explicit representation of context in agent-based models of complex adaptive spatial Systems. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 100(5): 1128–1155. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2010.517739
  • Topping CJ (2022) The Animal Landscape and Man Simulation System (ALMaSS): a history, design, and philosophy. Research Ideas and Outcomes 8: e89919. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.8.e89919
  • Topping CJ, Dalby L, Skov F (2016) Landscape structure and management alter the outcome of a pesticide ERA: Evaluating impacts of endocrine disruption using the ALMaSS European Brown Hare model. Science of The Total Environment 541: 1477–1488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.10.042
  • Topping CJ, Duan X (2024) ALMaSS Landscape and Farming Simulation: software classes and methods. Food and ecological Systems Modelling Journal 5: e121215. https://doi.org/10.3897/fmj.5.121215
  • Topping CJ, Hansen T (2003) ALMaSS, an agent-based model for animals in temperate European landscapes. Ecological Modelling 167: 65–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(03)00173-X
  • Topping CJ, Lagisz M (2012) Spatial dynamic factors affecting population-level risk assessment for a terrestrial arthropod: An agent-based modeling approach. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 18: 168–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2012.632292
  • Valbuena D, Verburg PH, Bregt AK, Ligtenberg A (2010) An agent-based approach to model land-use change at a regional scale. Landscape Ecology 25: 185–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-009-9380-6
  • Vasseur C, Joannon A, Aviron S, Burel F, Meynard J-M, Baudry J (2013) The cropping systems mosaic: How does the hidden heterogeneity of agricultural landscapes drive arthropod populations? Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 166: 3014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2012.08.013
  • Ziółkowska E, Laskowski R, Dominic AR, Stein S, Wenzel B, Kehlenbeck H, Riddervold M, Topping CJ (2024) Evaluating the impact of landscape structure and source-sink dynamics on non-target arthropod pesticide risk assessments in Germany. German Environment Agency, Texte | 58/2024, 150 pp. https://doi.org/10.60810/openumwelt-6012
  • Ziółkowska E, Tiktak A, Topping CJ (2022) Is the effectiveness of policy-driven mitigation measures on carabid populations driven by landscape and farmland heterogeneity? Applying a modelling approach in the Dutch agroecosystems. PLOS ONE 17(12): e0279639. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279639
  • Ziółkowska E, Topping CJ, Bednarska AJ, Laskowski R (2021) Supporting non-target arthropods in agroecosystems: Modelling effects of insecticides and landscape structure on carabids in agricultural landscapes. Science of the Total Environment 774: 145746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145746