Published March 19, 2026 | Version v1
Journal article Open

A 12S rDNA barcode reference library for Neotropical electric fishes (Teleostei, Gymnotiformes)

  • 1. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
  • 2. Department of Biology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, United States of America
  • 3. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada|Department of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, Orlando, Canada|Department of Cell and Systems Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

Description

DNA barcodes are instrumental for identifying species from tissues and environmental samples. Metabarcoding-based assessments of biodiversity depend on taxonomically accurate barcode sequence libraries that can be queried to determine which species are present in a sample. The mitochondrial 12S ribosomal RNA gene has been shown to function as a robust barcode for differentiating taxa and identifying species using environmental DNA (eDNA), but complete 12S reference barcodes remain scarce in public databases. We assembled a library of 12S rDNA reference barcodes for 152 species of Neotropical electric fishes from the order Gymnotiformes (Teleostei, Ostariophysi). These fishes are an abundant and diverse component of Neotropical freshwater ecosystems, but are often difficult to collect through conventional sampling approaches because of their nocturnal activity and association with dense substrates or deep-water habitats. This makes eDNA metabarcoding an especially suitable approach for their detection. We compiled a dataset comprising all gymnotiform families, with most sequences covering almost the entire 12S gene. Across the gene and within two widely used 12S eDNA metabarcoding loci (MiFish and teleo), our sequences show sufficient interspecific divergence to discriminate the majority of knifefish species included in our analyses. This dataset, therefore, provides a valuable new set of resources for differentiating amongst gymnotiform species and identifying them in environmental DNA samples.

Files

MBMG_article_181378.pdf

Files (1.2 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:cf7048275bd3389a276655363faaeb8e
1.1 MB Preview Download
md5:43740cd74505685c8451aca546100eed
115.6 kB Preview Download

Linked records

Additional details

References

  • Ahmed SI, Yu Z, Higuchi T, Inoue J, Kwok-Shing Wong M, Wang X, Lin Y, Itoh S, Komatsu K, Tsutsumi E, Fukuda H, Hyodo S, Morrongiello J, Bendif EM, Ito S (2025) Patterns in marine surface fish biodiversity and community composition detected by different eDNA metabarcoding sampling methods. Journal of Oceanography 82: 35–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10872-025-00771-x
  • Albert JS, Crampton WGR (2005) Diversity and phylogeny of neotropical electric fishes. In: Bullock TH, Hopkins CD, Popper AN, Fay RR (Eds) Electroreception, Springer, New York, 360–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28275-0_13
  • Albert JS, Crampton WGR, Thorsen DH, Lovejoy NR (2005) Phylogenetic systematics and historical biogeography of the Neotropical electric fish Gymnotus (Teleostei: Gymnotidae). Systematics and Biodiversity 2(4): 375–417. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1477200004001574
  • Allio R, Donega S, Galtier N, Nabholz B (2017) Large variation in the ratio of mitochondrial to nuclear mutation rate across animals: Implications for genetic diversity and the use of mitochondrial DNA as a molecular marker. Molecular Biology and Evolution 34(11): 2762–2772. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msx197
  • Altermatt F, Couton M, Carraro L, Keck F, Lawson-Handley L, Leese F, Zhang X, Zhang Y, Blackman RC (2025) Utilizing aquatic environmental DNA to address global biodiversity targets. Nature Reviews Biodiversity 1(5): 332–346. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44358-025-00044-x
  • Bennett DJ, Hettling H, Silvestro D, Zizka A, Bacon CD, Faurby S, Vos RA, Antonelli A (2018) phylotaR: An automated pipeline for retrieving orthologous DNA sequences from GenBank in R. Life 8(2): 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/life8020020
  • Boyse E, Robinson KP, Carr IM, Valsecchi E, Beger M, Goodman SJ (2025) Inferring species interactions from co-occurrence networks with environmental DNA metabarcoding data in a coastal marine food web. Molecular Ecology 34(7): e17701. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.17701
  • Cao Y, Adachi J, Janke A, Pääbo S, Hasegawa M (1994) Phylogenetic relationships among eutherian orders estimated from inferred sequences of mitochondrial proteins: Instability of a tree based on a single gene. Journal of Molecular Evolution 39: 519–527. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00173421
  • Carvalho CO, Gromstad W, Dunthorn M, Karlsen HE, Schrøder-Nielsen A, Ready JS, Haugaasen T, Sørnes G, de Boer H, Mauvisseau Q (2024) Harnessing eDNA metabarcoding to investigate fish community composition and its seasonal changes in the Oslo fjord. Scientific Reports 14(1): 10154. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-60762-8
  • Chan AHE, Saralamba N, Saralamba S, Ruangsittichai J, Thaenkham U (2022) The potential use of mitochondrial ribosomal genes (12S and 16S) in DNA barcoding and phylogenetic analysis of trematodes. BMC Genomics 23(1): 104. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-022-08302-4
  • Crampton WGR (2011) An ecological perspective on diversity and distributions. In: Albert JS, Reis RE (Eds) Historical biogeography of neotropical freshwater fishes, University of California Press, Berkeley, 165–189. https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520268685.003.0010
  • Crampton WGR (2019) Electroreception, electrogenesis and electric signal evolution. Journal of Fish Biology 95(1): 92–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.13922
  • Crampton WGR, Lovejoy NR, Waddell JC (2011) Reproductive character displacement and signal ontogeny in a sympatric assemblage of electric fishes. Evolution 65(6): 1650–1666. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01245.x
  • Crampton WGR, Poon L (2024) Silent signals in the dark: electric communication in fishes. Alderman SL, Gillis TE (Eds) Encyclopedia of Fish Physiology (2nd edn.), Academic Press, Amsterdam, 516–529.
  • Crampton WGR, Thorsen DH, Albert JS (2005) Three new species from a diverse, sympatric assemblage of the electric fish Gymnotus (Gymnotiformes: Gymnotidae) in the Lowland Amazon Basin, with notes on ecology. Copeia 2005(1): 82–99. https://doi.org/10.1643/CI-03-242R2
  • Deiner K, Bik HM, Mächler E, Seymour M, Lacoursière-Roussel A, Altermatt F, Creer S, Bista I, Lodge DM, de Vere N, Pfrender ME, Bernatchez L (2017) Environmental DNA metabarcoding: Transforming how we survey animal and plant communities. Molecular Ecology 26(21): 5872–5895. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.14350
  • de Santana CD, Vari RP (2013) Brown ghost electric fishes of the Apteronotus leptorhynchus species-group (Ostariophysi, Gymnotiformes); monophyly, major clades, and revision. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 168(3): 564–596. https://doi.org/10.1111/zoj.12022
  • Dziedzic E, Sidlauskas B, Cronn R, Anthony J, Cornwell T, Friesen TA, Konstantinidis P, Penaluna BE, Stein S, Levi T (2023) Creating, curating and evaluating a mitogenomic reference database to improve regional species identification using environmental DNA. Molecular Ecology Resources 23(8): 1880–1904. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13855
  • Eastwood N, Kissane S, Campbell L, Briscoe AG, Egeter B, Orsini L (2024) Single metabarcoding multiplex captures community-level freshwater biodiversity and beyond. Environmental DNA 6(1): e515. https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.515
  • Edgar RC (2004) MUSCLE: Multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Research 32(5): 1792–1797. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh340
  • Evans KM, Crampton WGR, Albert JS (2017) Taxonomic revision of the deep channel electric fish genus Sternarchella (Teleostei: Gymnotiformes: Apteronotidae), with descriptions of two new species. Neotropical Ichthyology 15: e160168. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0224-20160168
  • Fan A, Ni S, McCulloch GA, Waters JM (2025) Disturbance drives concordant functional biodiversity shifts across regions: New evidence from river eDNA. Ecography 2025(4): e07264. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.07264
  • Ford KL, Albert JS (2022) Is the medium the message? Functional diversity across abiotic gradients in freshwater electric fishes. Integrative and Comparative Biology 62(4): 945–957. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icac010
  • Fraija-Fernández N, Bouquieaux M-C, Rey A, Mendibil I, Cotano U, Irigoien X, Santos M, Rodríguez-Ezpeleta N (2020) Marine water environmental DNA metabarcoding provides a comprehensive fish diversity assessment and reveals spatial patterns in a large oceanic area. Ecology and Evolution 10(14): 7560–7584. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6482
  • Fricke R, Eschmeyer WN, van der Laan R (2025) Genera/species by family/subfamily in Eschmeyer's catalog of fishes. California Academy of Sciences. http://researcharchive.calacademy.org/research/ichthyology/catalog/fishcatmain.asp
  • Gaytán A, Bergsten J, Canelo T, Pérez-Izquierdo C, Santoro M, Bonal R (2020) DNA barcoding and geographical scale effect: The problems of undersampling genetic diversity hotspots. Ecology and Evolution 10(19): 10754–10772. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6733
  • Guindon S, Dufayard J-F, Lefort V, Anisimova M, Hordijk W, Gascuel O (2010) New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: Assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Systematic Biology 59(3): 307–321. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syq010
  • Gu S, Deng Y, Wang P, Li C, Shi D, Wang S (2023) Assessing riverine fish community diversity and stability by eDNA metabarcoding. Ecological Indicators 157: 111222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.111222
  • Hauser FE, Xiao D, Van Nynatten A, Brochu-De Luca KK, Rajakulendran T, Elbassiouny AE, Sivanesan H, Sivananthan P, Crampton WGR, Lovejoy NR (2024) Ecologically mediated differences in electric organ discharge drive evolution in a sodium channel gene in South American electric fishes. Biology Letters 20: 20230480. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2023.0480
  • Herrera-R GA, Oberdorff T, Anderson EP, Brosse S, Carvajal-Vallejos FM, Frederico RG, Hidalgo M, Jézéquel C, Maldonado M, Maldonado-Ocampo JA, Ortega H, Radinger J, Torrente-Vilara G, Zuanon J, Tedesco PA (2020) The combined effects of climate change and river fragmentation on the distribution of Andean Amazon fishes. Global Change Biology 26(10): 5509–5523. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15285
  • Hubert N, Hanner R (2015) DNA barcoding, species delineation and taxonomy: A historical perspective. DNA Barcodes 3: 44–58. https://doi.org/10.1515/dna-2015-0006
  • Janzen FH, Crampton WGR, Lovejoy NR (2022) A new taxonomist-curated reference library of DNA barcodes for Neotropical electric fish (Teleostei: Gymnotiformes). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 196(4): 1718–1742. https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlac039
  • Jiménez-Segura LF, Restrepo-Santamaria D, Ospina-Pabón JG, Castellanos-Mejía MC, Valencia-Rodríguez D, Galeano-Moreno AF, Londoño-López JL, Herrera-Pérez J, Medina-Ríos VM, Álvarez-Bustamente J, Mejía-Estrada M, Hernández-Zapata M, García-Melo LJ, Campo-Nieto O, Soto-Calderón ID, DoNascimiento C (2025) Fish databases for improving their conservation in Colombia. Scientific Data 12: 262. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-04352-3
  • Kumar S, Stecher G, Suleski M, Sanderford M, Sharma S, Tamura K (2024) MEGA12: Molecular Evolutionary Genetic Analysis version 12 for adaptive and green computing. Molecular Biology and Evolution 41(12): msae263. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msae263
  • Lapola DM, Pinho P, Barlow J, Aragão LEOC, Berenguer E, Carmenta R, Liddy HM, Seixas H, Silva CVJ, Silva-Junior CHL, Alencar AAC, Anderson LO, Armenteras D, Brovkin V, Calders K, Chambers J, Chini L, Costa MH, Faria BL, Fearnside PM, Ferreira J, Gatti L, Gutierrez-Velez V, Han Z, Hibbard K, Koven C, Lawrence P, Pongratz J, Portela BTT, Rounsevell M, Ruane AC, Schaldach R, Da Silva SS, Randow CV, Walker WS (2023) The drivers and impacts of Amazon forest degradation. Science 379(6630): eabp8622. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abp8622
  • Larsson A (2014) AliView: A fast and lightweight alignment viewer and editor for large datasets. Bioinformatics 30(22): 3276–3278. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu531
  • Mago-Leccia F (1994) Electric fishes of the continental waters of America. FUDECI, Caracas-Venezuela, 206 pp.
  • Marques V, Milhau T, Albouy C, Dejean T, Manel S, Mouillot D, Juhel J-B (2021) GAPeDNA: Assessing and mapping global species gaps in genetic databases for eDNA metabarcoding. Diversity and Distributions 27(10): 1880–1892. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.13142
  • Martel CM, Sutter M, Dorazio RM, Kinziger AP (2021) Using environmental DNA and occupancy modelling to estimate rangewide metapopulation dynamics. Molecular Ecology 30(13): 3340–3354. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.15693
  • Maxime EL, Albert JS (2009) A new species of Gymnotus (Gymnotiformes: Gymnotidae) from the Fitzcarrald Arch of southeastern Peru. Neotropical Ichthyology 7: 579–585. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-62252009000400004
  • Milan DT, Mendes IS, Damasceno JS, Teixeira DF, Sales NG, Carvalho DC (2020) New 12S metabarcoding primers for enhanced Neotropical freshwater fish biodiversity assessment. Scientific Reports 10(1): 17966. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-74902-3
  • Milhomem SSR, Pieczarka JC, Crampton WGR, Silva DS, De Souza ACP, Carvalho Jr JR, Nagamachi CY (2008) Chromosomal evidence for a putative cryptic species in the Gymnotus carapo species-complex (Gymnotiformes, Gymnotidae). BMC Genetics 9: 75. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-9-75
  • Miya M (2022) Environmental DNA metabarcoding: A novel method for biodiversity monitoring of marine fish communities. Annual Review of Marine Science 14: 161–185. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-041421-082251
  • Miya M, Gotoh RO, Sado T (2020) MiFish metabarcoding: A high-throughput approach for simultaneous detection of multiple fish species from environmental DNA and other samples. Fisheries Science 86(6): 939–970. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12562-020-01461-x
  • Miya M, Sato Y, Fukunaga T, Sado T, Poulsen JY, Sato K, Minamoto T, Yamamoto S, Yamanaka H, Araki H, Kondoh M, Iwasaki W (2015) MiFish, a set of universal PCR primers for metabarcoding environmental DNA from fishes: Detection of more than 230 subtropical marine species. Royal Society Open Science 2(7): 150088. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150088
  • Peixoto LAW, Dutra GM, de Santana CD, Wosiacki WB (2013) A new species of the electric fish genus Hypopygus (Gymnotiformes: Hypopomidae) from the Lower Amazon Basin, Brazil. Copeia 2013(2): 232–237. https://doi.org/10.1643/CI-12-087
  • Polanco FA, Richards E, Flück B, Valentini A, Altermatt F, Brosse S, Walser J-C, Eme D, Marques V, Manel S, Albouy C, Dejean T, Pellissier L (2021) Comparing the performance of 12S mitochondrial primers for fish environmental DNA across ecosystems. Environmental DNA 3(6): 1113–1127. https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.232
  • R Core Team (2025) R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 4.5.0). R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://doi.org/10.32614/r.manuals
  • Rees HC, Maddison BC, Middleditch DJ, Patmore JRM, Gough KC (2014) The detection of aquatic animal species using environmental DNA – a review of eDNA as a survey tool in ecology. Journal of Applied Ecology 51(5): 1450–1459. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12306
  • Riaz M, Warren D, Wittwer C, Cocchiararo B, Hundertmark I, Reiners TE, Klimpel S, Pfenninger M, Khaliq I, Nowak C (2023) Using eDNA to understand predator–prey interactions influenced by invasive species. Oecologia 202(4): 757–767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-023-05434-6
  • Sanderson MJ, Boss D, Chen D, Cranston KA, Wehe A (2008) The PhyLoTA Browser: Processing GenBank for molecular phylogenetics research. Systematic Biology 57(3): 335–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150802158688
  • Stoeckle MY, Ausubel JH, Coogan M (2024) 12S gene metabarcoding with DNA standard quantifies marine bony fish environmental DNA, identifies threshold for reproducible detection, and overcomes distortion due to amplification of non-fish DNA. Environmental DNA 6(1): e376. https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.376
  • Tagliacollo VA, Bernt MJ, Craig JM, Oliveira C, Albert JS (2016) Model-based total evidence phylogeny of Neotropical electric knifefishes (Teleostei, Gymnotiformes). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 95: 20–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2015.11.007
  • Tamura K, Nei M, Kumar S (2004) Prospects for inferring very large phylogenies by using the neighbor-joining method. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101(30): 11030–11035. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0404206101
  • Thomsen PF, Møller PR, Sigsgaard EE, Knudsen SW, Jørgensen OA, Willerslev E (2016) Environmental DNA from seawater samples correlate with trawl catches of subarctic, deepwater fishes. PLoS ONE 11(11): e0165252. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165252
  • Thomsen PF, Willerslev E (2015) Environmental DNA – An emerging tool in conservation for monitoring past and present biodiversity. Biological Conservation 183: 4–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.11.019
  • Valentini A, Taberlet P, Miaud C, Civade R, Herder J, Thomsen PF, Bellemain E, Besnard A, Coissac E, Boyer F, Gaboriaud C, Jean P, Poulet N, Roset N, Copp GH, Geniez P, Pont D, Argillier C, Baudoin J-M, Peroux T, Crivelli AJ, Olivier A, Acqueberge M, Le Brun M, Møller PR, Willerslev E, Dejean T (2016) Next-generation monitoring of aquatic biodiversity using environmental DNA metabarcoding. Molecular Ecology 25(4): 929–942. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13428
  • Van Nynatten A, Gallage KS, Lujan NK, Mandrak NE, Lovejoy NR (2023) Ichthyoplankton metabarcoding: An efficient tool for early detection of invasive species establishment. Molecular Ecology Resources 23(6): 1319–1333. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13803
  • van der Sleen P, Albert JS (2018) Field guide to the fishes of the Amazon, Orinoco & Guianas. Princeton University Press, New Jersey, 464.
  • Wang HY, Lee SC (2002) Secondary structure of mitochondrial 12S rRNA among fish and its phylogenetic applications. Molecular Biology and Evolution 19(2): 138–148. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004066
  • Wang Y, Song N, Liu S, Chen Z, Xu A, Gao T (2023) DNA barcoding of fishes from Zhoushan coastal waters using mitochondrial COI and 12S rRNA genes. Journal of Oceanology and Limnology 41: 1997–2009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-022-2214-y
  • Ward RD (2009) DNA barcode divergence among species and genera of birds and fishes. Molecular Ecology Resources 9(4): 1077–1085. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02541.x
  • Zhang GK, Chain FJJ, Abbott CL, Cristescu ME (2018) Metabarcoding using multiplexed markers increases species detection in complex zooplankton communities. Evolutionary Applications 11(10): 1901–1914. https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12694
  • Zhang S, Zhao J, Yao M (2020) A comprehensive and comparative evaluation of primers for metabarcoding eDNA from fish. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 11(12): 1609–1625. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13485