Published September 3, 2025 | Version v1
Journal article Open

BIOPOLE - Biogeochemical processes and ecosystem functioning in changing polar systems and their global impacts

  • 1. British Antarctic Survey, Cambridge, United Kingdom
  • 2. National Oceanography Centre, Southampton, United Kingdom
  • 3. British Geological Survey, Keyworth, United Kingdom
  • 4. UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Bangor, United Kingdom
  • 5. UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
  • 6. Mediterranean Institute of Oceanography, Marseille, France|National Oceanography Centre, Southampton, United Kingdom|Turing Centre for Living Systems, Marseille, France
  • 7. Edinburgh University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
  • 8. UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Wallingford, United Kingdom
  • 9. Centre for Polar Observation and Modelling, Northumbria University, Newcastle, United Kingdom
  • 10. Mediterranean Institute of Oceanography, Marseille, France|Turing Centre for Living Systems, Marseille, France
  • 11. University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom|National Oceanography Centre, Southampton, United Kingdom
  • 12. UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Lancaster, United Kingdom
  • 13. National Oceanography Centre, Southampton, United Kingdom|University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom

Description

The export of elements (particularly carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus) from the Poles critically supports global marine biodiversity and major fisheries as well as the sequestration of atmospheric carbon to the deep ocean. Ecosystem processes regulate this export, but major uncertainties remain in terms of how and by how much. Progress on understanding key ecosystem interactions is hindered by lack of data and their representation in Earth system models is poor. The two polar regions share similarities in environmental extremes which make them sensitive to the impacts of climate change. They both receive nutrients from multiple and diverse sources and the delivery of these nutrients to other oceans is regulated by similar ecosystem processes. However, the extent to which these ecosystem processes will be modified by climate change is unclear and urgently needs to be determined. BIOPOLE will determine how polar ecosystems regulate the balance of carbon and nutrients in the world's oceans and, through it, their effect on global fish stocks and carbon storage. It will address this challenge by integrating ambitious fieldwork campaigns and innovative modelling in a multidisciplinary and highly coordinated approach. BIOPOLE will capitalise on world-leading capabilities and infrastructure in ocean and high-latitude research, including cutting-edge land-based facilities, state-of-the-art polar research vessels and innovative autonomous instrumentation. Collaboration with national and international partners will further strengthen BIOPOLE's multidisciplinary approach and efficient use of infrastructure. BIOPOLE's legacy will be the first assessment of the global impact of polar ecosystems on biogeochemical cycling and fish stocks; technologically-novel approaches and strong partnerships between leading international science groups.

Files

RIO_article_163757.pdf

Files (737.1 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:797a4dd47bf2006779a46a6c2e055248
588.4 kB Preview Download
md5:93f8413a45f5ad4ee69c7ff68b46da3f
148.7 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • Boyd P, Claustre H, Levy M, Siegel D, Weber T (2019) Multi-faceted particle pumps drive carbon sequestration in the ocean. Nature 568 (7752): 327‑335. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1098-2
  • Chang B, Devol A (2009) Seasonal and spatial patterns of sedimentary denitrification rates in the Chukchi sea. Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography 56 (17): 1339‑1350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2008.10.024
  • Deutsch C, Weber T (2012) Nutrient Ratios as a Tracer and Driver of Ocean Biogeochemistry. Annual Review of Marine Science 4 (1): 113‑141. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-120709-142821
  • Fan G, Han Z, Ma W, Chen S, Chai F, Mazloff M, Pan J, Zhang H (2020) Southern Ocean carbon export efficiency in relation to temperature and primary productivity. Scientific Reports 10 (1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70417-z
  • Freer J, Tarling G, Collins M, Partridge J, Genner M (2020) Estimating circumpolar distributions of lanternfish using 2D and 3D ecological niche models. Marine Ecology Progress Series 647: 179‑193. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps13384
  • García-Martín EE, Serret P, Leakey RJ (2014) Plankton community and bacterial metabolism in Arctic sea ice leads during summer 2010. Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers 92: 152‑161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2014.06.007
  • Hendry K, Manno C, Arrowsmith C, Bowes M, Callaghan N, Lofts S, McKenzie R, O'Brien A, Olszewska J, Pickard A, Spears B, Tye A, Woodward EMS, BIOPOLE (2025) BIOPOLE COOKBOOK: PARAMETERS AND ANALYSIS (Version 8). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15188897
  • Hodson A, Nowak A, Christiansen H (2015) Glacial and periglacial floodplain sediments regulate hydrologic transfer of reactive iron to a high arctic fjord. Hydrological Processes 30 (8): 1219‑1229. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10701
  • Jónasdóttir SH, Visser A, Richardson K, Heath M (2015) Seasonal copepod lipid pump promotes carbon sequestration in the deep North Atlantic. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112 (39): 12122‑12126. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1512110112
  • Martiny A, Pham CA, Primeau F, Vrugt J, Moore JK, Levin S, Lomas M (2013) Strong latitudinal patterns in the elemental ratios of marine plankton and organic matter. Nature Geoscience 6 (4): 279‑283. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1757
  • Matsumoto K, Tanioka T, Rickaby R (2020) Linkages Between Dynamic Phytoplankton C:N:P and the Ocean Carbon Cycle Under Climate Change. Oceanography 33 (2). https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2020.203
  • Moore CM, Mills MM, Arrigo KR, Berman-Frank I, Bopp L, Boyd PW, Galbraith ED, Geider RJ, Guieu C, Jaccard SL, Jickells TD, La Roche J, Lenton TM, Mahowald NM, Marañón E, Marinov I, Moore JK, Nakatsuka T, Oschlies A, Saito MA, Thingstad TF, Tsuda A, Ulloa O (2013) Processes and patterns of oceanic nutrient limitation. Nature Geoscience 6 (9): 701‑710. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1765
  • Moore JK, Fu W, Primeau F, Britten G, Lindsay K, Long M, Doney S, Mahowald N, Hoffman F, Randerson J (2018) Sustained climate warming drives declining marine biological productivity. Science 359 (6380): 1139‑1143. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao6379
  • Murphy EJ, Cavanagh RD, Drinkwater KF, Grant SM, Heymans JJ, Hofmann EE, Hunt GL, Johnston NM (2016) Understanding the structure and functioning of polar pelagic ecosystems to predict the impacts of change. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 283 (1844). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.1646
  • Paffrath R, Laukert G, Bauch D, Rutgers van der Loeff M, Pahnke K (2021) Separating individual contributions of major Siberian rivers in the Transpolar Drift of the Arctic Ocean. Scientific Reports 11 (1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86948-y
  • Record N, Ji R, Maps F, Varpe Ø, Runge J, Petrik C, Johns D (2018) Copepod diapause and the biogeography of the marine lipidscape. Journal of Biogeography 45 (10): 2238‑2251. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.13414
  • Redfield AC. (1934) On the proportions of organic derivatives in sea water and their relation to the composition of plankton. University Press of Liverpool 1.
  • Sarmiento JL, Gruber N, Brzezinski MA, Dunne JP (2004) High-latitude controls of thermocline nutrients and low latitude biological productivity. Nature 427 (6969): 56‑60. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02127
  • Torres‐Valdés S, Tsubouchi T, Bacon S, Naveira‐Garabato A, Sanders R, McLaughlin F, Petrie B, Kattner G, Azetsu‐Scott K, Whitledge T (2013) Export of nutrients from the Arctic Ocean. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 118 (4): 1625‑1644. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrc.20063
  • van Sebille E, Griffies S, Abernathey R, Adams T, Berloff P, Biastoch A, Blanke B, Chassignet E, Cheng Y, Cotter C, Deleersnijder E, Döös K, Drake H, Drijfhout S, Gary S, Heemink A, Kjellsson J, Koszalka IM, Lange M, Lique C, MacGilchrist G, Marsh R, Mayorga Adame CG, McAdam R, Nencioli F, Paris C, Piggott M, Polton J, Rühs S, Shah SA, Thomas M, Wang J, Wolfram P, Zanna L, Zika J (2018) Lagrangian ocean analysis: Fundamentals and practices. Ocean Modelling 121: 49‑75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2017.11.008
  • Wassmann P, Reigstad M, Haug T, Rudels B, Carroll M, Hop H, Gabrielsen GW, Falk-Petersen S, Denisenko S, Arashkevich E, Slagstad D, Pavlova O (2006) Food webs and carbon flux in the Barents Sea. Progress in Oceanography 71: 232‑287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2006.10.003
  • Wrona F, Johansson M, Culp J, Jenkins A, Mård J, Myers‐Smith I, Prowse T, Vincent W, Wookey P (2016) Transitions in Arctic ecosystems: Ecological implications of a changing hydrological regime. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences 121 (3): 650‑674. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015jg003133
  • Yamamoto-Kawai M, Carmack E, McLaughlin F (2006) Nitrogen balance and Arctic throughflow. Nature 443 (7107): 43‑43. https://doi.org/10.1038/443043a
  • Zeng J, Chen M, Zheng M, Hu W, Qiu Y (2017) A potential nitrogen sink discovered in the oxygenated Chukchi Shelf waters of the Arctic. Geochemical Transactions 18 (1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12932-017-0043-2