ДИФЕРЕНЦІАЦІЯ КОНЦЕПТУАЛЬНИХ ІНТЕРПРЕТАЦІЙ ПОНЯТТЯ «КОМУНІКАЦІЯ» В СУЧАСНІЙ ФІЛОСОФІЇ

The article is revealed the basic directions of study of communication
processes in modern philosophical thought. It is considered views on the
nature of communication classics of social and philosophical thought of
XX century Karl Jaspers, N. Luhmann, J. Habermas, М. McLuhan. The
author analyzes the introduction of the concept of scientific revolution of
communication, thanks to research in the field of cybernetics and
information theory. For a example is the studies of Claude Elwood
Shannon and Norbert Wiener of broadcast and information exchange
contributed to the theory of communication and its widespread outside
the sciences. The author observes that the ideas of German researcher
Niklas Luhmann are concerned the theory of social systems directly
derived from mathematical cybernetic theories. Luhmann theory
considers communication as the foundation of the whole theory of social systems, which identifies communication and society. It is highlighted
and described three selection of communication by N. Luhmann –
information, communication and understanding in the article. The
communication is approached of German philosopher Jurgen Habermas
and provided a broader understanding and application of the concept of
«communication» as a way of communication and interaction between
people in the social sphere, the hallmark of which is productive,
constructive dialogue. It can be submitted a communication between
society and science in the dialogue form. It is highlighted the study of
Canadian philosopher and critic Herbert Marshall McLuhan, considered
the phenomenon of communication through the prism of media
communication, how we impact on media communication in the article.
The author concludes that referring to communication, we are dealing
with the phenomenon and concepts that have deep philosophical
significance. Communication has been and always will be, but it is
comprehensive, general nature only discovered in modern times, still
requires a philosophical understanding of this phenomenon.