Published February 28, 2022 | Version v1

Table 4 in Postembryonic development in freshwater crayfish (Decapoda: Astacidea) in an evolutionary context

  • 1. Hokkaido Research Organization, Central Fisheries Research Institution. 238 Hamanaka, Yoichi, Hokkaido 045 - 8555, Japan. & E
  • 2. Universits of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Facults of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversits of Hsdrocenoses. Zátiší 728 / II, 389 25 Vodňans, Czech Republic.

Description

Table 4. Comparison of the morphologs of each postembrsonic stage of Parastacidae members.

Cherax destructor Clark, 19361)Engaeus cisternarius Suter, 19772)Parastacus brasiliensis (von Martens, 1869) 3)Parastacus nicoleti (Philippi, 1882) 4)Parastacus pugnax (Poeppig, 1835) 5)
Stage I
EseStalk absentStalk absentStalk absentStalk absentStalk absent
CarapaceRostrum bent downward, carapace globular without setaeRostrum bent downward, carapace globular without setaeRostrum bent downward, carapace globular without setaeRostrum bent downward, carapace globular without setaeRostrum bent downward, carapace globular without setae
Antenna 1Seta absent, internal and external flagellum both with 8 segmentsSeta absent, internal and external flagellum with 3–5 segmentsSeta absent, internal and external flagellum with 4–6 segmentsSeta absent internal and external flagellum with 3–4 segmentsSeta absent internal and external flagellum with 4–6 segments
Antennal scaleSeta absentSeta absentSeta absentSeta absentSeta absent
Antenna 2Seta absent, flagellum with 26–28 segmentsSeta absent flagellum with 25 segmentsSeta absent flagellum with 28–30 segmentsSeta absent flagellum with 23 segmentsSeta absent flagellum with 23 segments
MandibleDentition absentDentition absentDentition absentDentition absentDentition absent
Maxilla 1Seta absentSeta absentSeta absentSeta absentSeta absent
MaxillipedSeta on distal end of exopodite absentSeta on distal end of exopodite absentSeta on distal end of exopodite absentSeta on distal end of exopodite absentSeta on distal end of exopodite absent
Pereiopod tipRecurved hookRecurved hookRecurved hookRecurved hookRecurved hook
PereiopodSeta absentSeta absentSeta absentSeta absentSeta absent
PleopodSeta absentSeta absentSeta absentSeta absentSeta absent
TelsonSub-rectangular with rounded border, devoid of setaeSub-rectangular with rounded borderSub-rectangular with rounded borderSub-rectangular with rounded borderSub-rectangular with rounded border, dorsomarginal small tubercles
Stage II
EseStalk presentStalk presentStalk presentStalk presentStalk present
RostrumRostrum slightly developed without setae, carapace less globularRostrum slightly developed without setae,carapace less globular?Rostrum slightly developed without setae, carapace less globularRostrum slightly developed without setae, carapace less globular
Antenna 1Seta absent, internal and external flagellum both with 8–9 segmentsSeta absent, internal and external flagellum both with 6 segmentsSeta absent,internal and external flagellum with 6–8 segmentsSeta absent, internal and external flagellum with 5–6 segmentsSeta absent, internal and external flagellum both with 6–9 segments
Antennal scaleSeta absentSeta absentSeta absentSeta absentSeta absent
Antenna 2Seta absent, flagellum with 39–41 segmentsSeta absent, flagellum with 29 segmentsSeta absent, flagellum with 34 segmentsSeta absent, flagellum with 29 segmentsSeta absent, flagellum with 31 segments
MandibleDentition presentDentition presentDentition presentDentition presentDentition present
Maxilla 1Seta presentSeta presentSeta presentSeta?Seta?
Maxilla 2Scaphognathite with 3 longer setae on distal partScaphognathite with 3 longer setae on distal partScaphognathite with 3 longer setae on distal partScaphognathite with 1 longer plumose seta on distal partScaphognathite with 1 longer plumose seta on distal part
MaxillipedSetae on distal end of exopodite absentSetae on distal end of exopodite absentSetae on distal end of exopodite absentSetae on distal end of exopodite absentSetae on distal end of exopodite absent
Pereiopod tipRe-curved spineRe-curved spineRe-curved spineRe-curved spineRe-curved spine
PereiopodSeta presentSeta presentSeta presentSeta presentSeta present
PleopodLong seta absentLong seta absent???
TelsonSub-rectangular with rounded border, dorsomarginal 20 tuberclesSub-rectangular with rounded border, dorsomarginal tuberclesSub-rectangular with rounded border,devoid of setaeSub-rectangular with rounded border,devoid of setaeSub-rectangular with rounded border, dorsomarginal tubercles
Stage III
Antenna 1Seta presentSeta presentSeta presentSeta presentSeta present
Antennal scaleSeta presentSeta presentSeta presentSeta presentSeta present
Antenna 2Seta presentSeta presentSeta presentSeta presentSeta present
Maxilla 1Seta presentSeta presentSeta presentSeta presentSeta present
MaxillipedSetae on distal end of exopodite presentSetae on distal end of exopodite presentSetae on distal end of exopodite presentSetae on distal end of exopodite presentSetae on distal end of exopodite present
Pereiopod tipCurved spineCurved spineCurved spineCurved spineCurved spine
PleopodSeta presentSeta presentSeta presentSeta presentSeta present
TelsonSegmented with long plumose setaeSegmented with long plumose setaeSegmented with long plumose setaeSegmented with long plumose setaeSegmented with long plumose setae

1)

Present studs, 2) Suter (1977). 3) Noro et al. (2005), 4) Rudolph and Zapata (1986), 5) Rudolph and Rios (1987).

Italic tspe shows the diagonistic characters for each famils and Roman tspe the apomorphic characters in the four families.

Notes

Published as part of Kawai, Tadashi & Kouba, Antonín, 2022, Postembryonic development in freshwater crayfish (Decapoda: Astacidea) in an evolutionary context, pp. 38-39 in Nauplius (e 2022001) 30 on page 38, DOI: 10.1590/2358-2936e2022001, http://zenodo.org/record/10716530

Files

Files (9.0 kB)

Name Size
md5:6ac8be007dcd204dcac27255116390e1
9.0 kB Download

System files (21.4 kB)

Name Size
md5:47f41719dba014b1f8c329c0093a7860
21.4 kB Download

Additional details

Related works

Is part of
Journal article: 10.1590/2358-2936e2022001 (DOI)
Journal article: urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:7F616554FF81FFC9FFA1FFFECB6A7738 (LSID)
Journal article: http://publication.plazi.org/id/7F616554FF81FFC9FFA1FFFECB6A7738 (URL)
Journal article: http://zenodo.org/record/10716530 (URL)

References

  • Philippi, R. A. 1882. Zoolojia chilena. Anales de la Universidad de Chile, 61: 624 - 628.
  • Poeppig, E. 1835. Reise in Chile, Peru und auf dem Amazonstrome wahrend der Jahre 1827 - 1832, erster band. Leipzig, Friedrich Fleischer, 490 p.
  • Suter, P. J. 1977. The biologs of two species of Engaeus (Decapoda: Parastacidae) in Tasmania II. Life histors and larval development, with particular reference to. E. cisternarius. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 28: 85 - 93.
  • Noro, C. K.; Buckup, L. and Bond-Buckup, G. 2005. The juvenile stages of Parastacus brasliensis (von Martens, 1869) (Crustacea, Decapoda, Parastacidae). Journal of Natural History, 39: 1831 - 1873.
  • Rudolph, E. and Zapata, L. A. 1986. Desarrollo embriosario s postlarval del camaron de las vegas Parastacus nicoleti (Phillipi, 1882), en condiciones de laboratorio. Biota, Chile, 2: 37 - 50.
  • Rudolph, E. and Rios, J. 1987. Ontogenetic development of the Chilean burrowing crasfish Parastacus pugnax (Poepping, 1835), under laborators conditions. Biota, Chile, 3: 45 - 58.