Published March 2, 2022 | Version v1

Table 7 in First population-level study of the ammonite genus Hildoglochiceras Spath, and the Lower Tithonian record of the Hildoglochiceras Horizon in the Kachchh Basin, India

  • 1. Department of Geology, School of Earth, Biological and Environmental Science, Central University of South Bihar SH 7, Gaya-Panchanpur Road, Village Karhara, Post Fatehpur, Gaya 824236 (Bihar), India
  • 2. FG Palaeoumwelt, GeoZentrum Nordbayern der Friedrich-Alexander-Universitaet Erlangen-Nuernberg, Loewenichstrasse 28, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
  • 3. State Key Laboratory for Mineral Deposits Research, School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Centre for Research and Education on Biological Evolution and Environment and Frontiers Science Center for Critical Earth Material Cycling, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu Province, China
  • 4. Yenepoya Research Centre, Yenepoya (Deemed to be University), Mangalore- 575018, India
  • 5. Departamento de Estratigrafia y Paleontologia, Fac. Ciencias, Univ. Granada, Severo Ochoa s / n, Spain

Description

Table 7. On the basis of linear regression analysis followed by post hoc likelihood ratio test, the diameter of umbilicus is mostly dependent on the diameter of the shell and can be best modelled as the linear expression of diameter of the shell and the height of whorl. It is least dependent on the thickness of the whorl, especially when modelled alongside the diameter of the shell.

Model No.ModelAICR2Adjusted R2P-value
Model 1glm(a$U ~a$D)277.60.81960.81642.20E-16
Model 2glm(a$U ~a$H)319.20.63490.62854.41E-14
Model 3glm(a$U ~a$T)292.60.76750.76352.2E-16
Model 4glm(a$U ~a$D+a$H)1840.96430.9631For D = 2.2E-16; For H = 2.2E-16, Overall = <2.2E-16
Model 5glm(a$U ~a$D+a$T)276.60.82880.8227For D = 3.79E-05; For T = 0.0886, Overall = <2.2E-16
Model 6glm(a$U ~a$H+a$T)279.10.82110.8147For FI = 0.000137; For T = 3.1E-10, Overall <2.2E-16
Model 7glm(a$U ~a$H+a$T+a$D)185.40.96470.9628For D = 2.2E-16; For H = 2.2E-16, For T = 0.462, Overall = <2.2E-16
Likelihood Ratio Test
Chi squareP-value
Model 1 vs. Model 495.6611.37E-22
Model 1 vs. Model 53.8280.079
Model 1 vs. Model 796.2461.26E-21
Model 2 vs. Model 4137.2501.06E-31P value: Probability value
Model 2 vs. Model 642.0828.75E-11AIC: Akaike information criterion
Model 2 vs. Model 7137.8351.17E-30R2: Regression coefficient
Model 3 vs. Model 518.0422.16E-05
Model 3 vs. Model 615.4518.64E-05
Model 3 vs. Model 7111.2057.12E-25

Notes

Published as part of Pandey, Dhirendra Kumar, Fuersich, Franz T., Alberti, Matthias, Das, Ranajit & Saez, Federico Oloriz, 2022, First population-level study of the ammonite genus Hildoglochiceras Spath, and the Lower Tithonian record of the Hildoglochiceras Horizon in the Kachchh Basin, India, pp. 1 in Zitteliana 96 on page 1, DOI: 10.3897/zitteliana.96.73892

Files

Files (5.1 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:7017c4af31542acb57c7705e8ad84fcc
5.1 kB Download

System files (10.4 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:90e685ceada8868326cbb6582577072c
10.4 kB Download

Additional details

Related works

Is part of
Journal article: 10.3897/zitteliana.96.73892 (DOI)
Journal article: urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:D5F97D7240455065AD6C43481AAD2D6D (LSID)
Journal article: http://publication.plazi.org/id/D5F97D7240455065AD6C43481AAD2D6D (URL)
Journal article: http://zenodo.org/record/null (URL)
Journal article: 10.3897/zitteliana.96.73892 (DOI)