Published January 6, 2025 | Version 2025.01

Baseline and Future (Shared Socio-economic Pathways 1-2.6 and 3-7.0 for the 2050s) Climate Suitability Maps for 381 Useful Tree Species for Burkina Faso

Authors/Creators

  • 1. World Agroforestry Centre
  • 2. CIFOR
  • 3. ICRAF

Description

Climate suitability scores were calculated for 381 useful tree species. These species were prioritized as they were either included in Michel Arbonnier’s Trees, Shrubs and Lianas of West African dry zones (TSLWAD), were tree species with documented traditional plant uses in Burkina Faso (Zizka et al. 2015), or were in the list of native useful tree species obtained from the GlobalUsefulNativeTrees database (GlobUNT; Kindt et al. 2023a). Species from TSLWAD were filtered by selecting species where information on their habitat referenced Sahelo-Saharan, Sahelian, Sahelo-Sudanian, Sudanian and Sudano-Guinean zones, whereas species from (Zizka et al. 2015) were filtered by being included in GlobUNT and having minimum one documented use.

After compiling the list of species, we checked afterwards for the availability of globally observed environmental ranges for these species from the TreeGOER database (Kindt 2023). Species with fewer than 10 observations in TreeGOER were excluded. Species without any suitable raster cells in the baseline climate were also excluded.

The climate scoring system is the same that is used in the GlobalUsefulNativeTrees database:

  • Score = 3 means that in 'environmental space' the planting site occurs within the 25% - 75% species's range (as documented in the TreeGOER) for all variables
  • Score = 2 corresponds to the 5% - 95% species's range for all variables
  • Score = 1 corresponds to the 0% - 100% species's range for all variables
  • Score = 0.5 means that the planting site occurs outside the 0% - 100% species's range for some of the variables, but for heat-related bioclimatic variables (used to produce the maps shown here: BIO01, monthCountByTemp10, growingDegDays5, BIO05 and BIO06) to be below the minimum (‘too cold but not too hot’) and for water-related bioclimatic variables (used here: BIO12, climaticMoistureIndex, BIO16, BIO17 and MCWD) to be above the maximum (‘too wet but not too dry’)
  • Score = 0 means that the planting site occurs outside the 0% - 100% species's range for some of the variables

 

Climate scores were obtained for future climates (2050s: 2041-2060) from the median values from 24 Global Climate Models (GCMs) for Shared Socio-Economic Pathway (SSP) 1-2.6 and from 22 GCMs for SSP 3-7.0. Future and baseline bioclimatic layers were processed from raster layers obtained from WorldClim 2.1 at resolutions of 2.5 arc-minutes. Similar methods were used to obtain median values for the ClimateForecasts and CitiesGOER databases.

Calculations of climate scores were made with similar scripting pipelines in the R statistical environment as documented here: https://rpubs.com/Roeland-KINDT/1168650. These scripts use similar calculation methods as those used for the global case studies of the TreeGOER manuscript (Kindt 2023), and used internally in the GlobalUsefulNativeTrees online database. Interested readers should especially refer to the manuscript for further details on methods used and their justification.

Alternative future climate maps were obtained by calculating climate scores for each GCM and SSP separately, then counting the number of GCMs that projected that the species would be suitable under the future climatic conditions. A species was estimated to be suitable for a particular combination of GCM and SSP if its score was 1 or above. The maps distinguished areas where 33% or fewer of the GCMs predicted that the species would be suitable, and areas where 66% or more of the GCMs predicted that the species would be suitable. Those thresholds correspond to the Mastrandea et al. (2011) likelihood scale, which was adopted earlier in another climate change atlas (Kindt et al. 2023b; https://atlas.worldagroforestry.org/). A separate mapping category shows where 66% or more GCMs had a climate score of 2 or 3.

 

Percentage of GCMs projecting that the species is suitable Count of GCMs for SSP 1-2.6 Count of GCMs for SSP 3-7.0
0 % 0 0
<= 33 % ('Unlikely') 1 - 8 1 - 7
33 % < percentage < 66 % 9 - 15 8 - 14
>= 66 % ('Likely') 16 - 24 15 - 22
>= 66 % with a Climate Score > 1 ('Likely') 16 - 24 15 - 22

 

The maps include a red polygon showing the country outline of Burkina Faso obtained from the GADM database. The first map for the baseline climate includes presence observations in the country obtained from the RAINBIO database (Dauby et al. 2016) and from the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (filtered from the occurrences that informed the TreeGOER database; GBIF.org 2021 GBIF Occurrence Download https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.77gcvq).

The MS Excel file contains columns that include information from World Flora Online, including hyperlinks to this online flora. Other columns indicate whether the species was included among assemblages of native useful tree species for the country in the GlobalUsefulNativeTrees database.

 

References

  • Arbonnier Michel. 2004. Trees, shrubs and lianas of West African dry zones. Montpellier : CIRAD-MNHN, 579 p. ISBN 2-85653-571-2 ; 2-87614-579-0
  • Zizka, A., Thiombiano, A., Dressler, S. et al. Traditional plant use in Burkina Faso (West Africa): a national-scale analysis with focus on traditional medicine. J Ethnobiology Ethnomedicine 11, 9 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-11-9
  • Kindt, R. (2023). TreeGOER: A database with globally observed environmental ranges for 48,129 tree species. Global Change Biology, 00, 1–16. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcb.16914.
  • Kindt, R. (2024). TreeGOER: Tree Globally Observed Environmental Ranges (2024.07) [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13132613
  • Kindt, R., Graudal, L., Lillesø, JP.B. et al. (2023a). GlobalUsefulNativeTrees, a database documenting 14,014 tree species, supports synergies between biodiversity recovery and local livelihoods in landscape restoration. Sci Rep 13, 12640. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-39552-1
  • Kindt R, Abiyu A, Borchardt P, Dawson IK, Demissew S, Graudal L, Jamnadass R, Lillesø J-PB, Moestrup S, Pedercini F, Wieringa JJ, Wubalem T. 2023b. The Climate change atlas for Africa of tree species prioritized for forest landscape restoration in Ethiopia: A description of methods used to develop the atlas. Working Paper No. 17. Bogor, Indonesia; and Nairobi, Kenya: Center for International Forestry Research and World Agroforestry (CIFOR-ICRAF). https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor-icraf/008977
  • Kindt, R. (2023). CitiesGOER: Globally Observed Environmental Data for 52,602 Cities with a Population ≥ 5000 (2023.10) [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10004594
  • Kindt, R. (2024). ClimateForecasts: Globally Observed Environmental Data for 15,504 Weather Station Locations (2024.07) [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12679832
  • Fick, S. E., & Hijmans, R. J. (2017). WorldClim 2: New 1‐km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology, 37(12), 4302–4315. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5086
  • Title, P. O., & Bemmels, J. B. (2018). ENVIREM: An expanded set of bioclimatic and topographic variables increases flexibility and improves performance of ecological niche modeling. Ecography, 41(2), 291–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.02880
  • Mastrandrea, M.D., Mach, K.J., Plattner, GK. et al. The IPCC AR5 guidance note on consistent treatment of uncertainties: a common approach across the working groups. Climatic Change 108, 675 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0178-6
  • Dauby G, Zaiss R, Blach-Overgaard A, Catarino L, Damen T, Deblauwe V, Dessein S, Dransfield J, Droissart V, Duarte MC, Engledow H, Fadeur G, Figueira R, Gereau RE, Hardy OJ, Harris DJ, de Heij J, Janssens S, Klomberg Y, Ley AC, Mackinder BA, Meerts P, van de Poel JL, Sonké B, Sosef MSM, Stévart T, Stoffelen P, Svenning J-C, Sepulchre P, van der Burgt X, Wieringa JJ, Couvreur TLP (2016) RAINBIO: a mega-database of tropical African vascular plants distributions. PhytoKeys 74: 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.74.9723

 

Funding

The development of this climate change atlas for Burkina Faso was supported by the German International Climate Initiative (IKI) to the regional tree seed programme on The Right Tree for the Right Place for the Right Purpose in Africa and by the Green Climate Fund through the Readiness proposal on Climate Appropriate Portfolios of Tree Diversity for Burkina Faso project.

 

Files

Burkina_A.zip

Files (2.7 GB)

Name Size
md5:49d2bf870e05bd8fc25447c2863273ea
68.6 kB Download
md5:8f58cb50dde12bfb28cb11537fca765a
206.4 MB Preview Download
md5:0559202b1f4174a66093c60980b932a6
156.6 MB Preview Download
md5:73ade981230e6b1feec477f514738ee3
334.5 MB Preview Download
md5:120ff7e00272588150eaeae0fa87559e
128.1 MB Preview Download
md5:8ddbae0263efeb34acb566bb37702072
121.0 MB Preview Download
md5:fa1399acf7d8d1dbd57a5a931aea9b1b
192.2 MB Preview Download
md5:84823e9a025778647b2b37f612057eec
163.7 MB Preview Download
md5:88295e1199d8c1bab767a551c39ccef1
71.2 MB Preview Download
md5:a575e7f07304cbc18ba1a6b1b2df8225
42.7 MB Preview Download
md5:d7e5977745269fc56c3bdc1c9dc3cda2
35.6 MB Preview Download
md5:881992c54ec63777e283abe8abd62b19
92.5 MB Preview Download
md5:f18ce193fd1207381b60da6d02044fc3
135.2 MB Preview Download
md5:c3f10f434f876e9c096d11590a8cf1e8
49.8 MB Preview Download
md5:7a33fca38c92c16792c360d44bef5ed5
64.0 MB Preview Download
md5:252b05218a972cc3e22c423e78ffa8b3
249.1 MB Preview Download
md5:a2c5216f6d010428c10c4e8dc4d9b64c
71.2 MB Preview Download
md5:067efdac27eaf2e98644a28c5126abea
256.2 MB Preview Download
md5:3a7704d125ae3c457728d161774440dd
128.1 MB Preview Download
md5:a7fc8b0eb40a23e2239f699ac7fbeac8
14.2 MB Preview Download
md5:4959c57b4a473f9d85b31883c4ba2af8
113.9 MB Preview Download
md5:f2b3bf7f87e12a76c03ff3d30f7dd8ba
14.2 MB Preview Download
md5:8f87cebd92a4ffb5f48cebb335984764
42.7 MB Preview Download