Published December 5, 2024 | Version v1

Water hyacinth occurrence and satellite derived covariates for South Africa

  • 1. ROR icon Stellenbosch University
  • 2. ROR icon University of the Witwatersrand

Description

Table S1. Feature descriptions, associated units, temporal coverages, and data sources of the features considered to investigate the likely drivers of water hyacinth occurrence. All explanatory variables were downloaded at a 30 m spatial resolution. Those variables that were only available at a coarser spatial resolution (> 30 m) were automatically resampled to 30 m using bilinear interpolation within Google Earth Engine.

Variable

Units

Temporal coverage

Source

Number of consecutive nights with less than 10 degrees Celsius

days

2013

MODIS LST- night

Area of waterbody

m2

2013

(Singh et al., 2020)

Median river width at mean discharge

m

1984 - 2018

Global River Width from Landsat (GRWL) (Allen & Pavelsky, 2018)

*Area of aquatic vegetation

m2

2013

(Singh et al., 2020)

*Minimum Temperature in the coldest month between1970 and1990

°C

1970 - 2000

WorldClim

Connectivity- upstream and downstream river count

river count

2000

WWF hydrosheds (Grill et al., 2019)

*Water seasonality- number of months water is present

month count

**1984 - 2019

JRC GSW (Pekel et al., 2016)

*Total precipitation

mm

**1958 - 2021

TerraClimate

*Distance to nearest coastline

m

2009

NOAA (https://oceancolor.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/distfromcoast/)

*Distance to roads

m

1979 - 2010

Global Road Infrastructure Project (GRIP) (Meijer et al., 2018)

Elevation

m

2000

NASADEM

*Continuous Heat Insolation Load Index (0=cool, 255=warm). Surrogate for effects of shading and topographic insolation

0-255

2006 - 2011

SRTM, (Theobald et al., 2015)

*Global Human Modification (1= high modification)

0 - 1

2016

(Kennedy et al., 2019)

*Topographic diversity- Surrogate for the variety of temperature and moisture conditions available to species as local habitats

-1323 - 8.81

2006 - 2011

SRTM, (Theobald et al., 2015)

Frost duration - Median duration of frost

day count

2007

(Schulze & Maharaj, 2007)

Number of days below 0°C (0-365)

day count

**2000 - present

MODIS- LST, night temperature

Number of days below 10°C (0-365)

day count

**2000 - present

MODIS- LST, night temperature

*South African National Land Cover (73 class)

km2

2013 - 2014

GeoTerraimage

*Mean Annual Runoff

mm/year

2005

Strategic Water Source Areas (SWSA)

*Broad (10) class Landcover

% (cover fraction)

2015

Copernicus Global Land Landcover Layers (CGLS-100)(Buchhorn et al., 2020)

*Flood hazard with a 10-year return period

water depth (m)

2016

Joint Research Commission (Dottori et al., 2016)

Riparian soil nitrogen (5km buffer)

g/kg

1905 - 2016

Soil grids

 

Riparian soil ph (5km buffer)

pH

1905 - 2016

Soil grids

*Riparian soil carbon (5km buffer)

g/kg

1905 - 2016

Soil grids

*Stream Power Index (SPI)

-1 - 1

1987 - 2017

GeoMorpho90 GeoMorphometric layers (Amatulli et al., 2020)

*Relative wealth index

-1 - 1

2001 - 2019

Facebook (https://dataforgood.fb.com/tools/relative-wealth-index/)

13 iSDA Soil layers (includes *total nitrogen, etc.)

various

2013 - 2019

(Hengl et al., 2021)

*Mean wind speed for a 10-year period

m/s

2008 - 2017

Global wind atlas

* Included in final model, ** Multi-temporal data - 2013 or temporally closest data was selected

 

           

Abstract (En)

Despite a long history of management efforts targeting invasive water hyacinth, Pontederia crassipes, their success has been inconsistent. Identifying the most appropriate management strategy remains challenging and is shown here to be contingent upon the ecological and socio-economic context in which the weed proliferates. Motivated by the advent of numerous Earth Observation (EO) derived map products, and recent advances in explainable Artificial Intelligence (xAI), we discerned the environmental and socio-economic contexts impacting water hyacinth prevalence across multiple spatial scales in South Africa. We used SHaply Additive exPlanations (SHAP), a model-based approach, to interpret the response of water hyacinth to an array of biotic and abiotic factors captured by a Species Distribution Model (SDM). Consistent patterns emerge between modelled plant responses and known physiological constraints limiting water hyacinth growth, such as minimum temperature. Additionally, our findings revealed novel spatial patterns with climatic factors in coastal regions and with vegetation type in the country's interior. These findings have the potential to facilitate future laboratory and field-based investigations aimed at corroborating and elucidating the fundamental mechanisms underpinning novel non-linear trends and invader-covariate interaction effects. The spatially explicit outcomes presented here, covering all South African waterbodies, serve to facilitate risk-prioritisation and the selection of context-specific management strategies based upon a data-driven approach. This study demonstrates the power of combining EO data, SDMs, and xAI techniques to enhance our understanding of invasive species dynamics and inform adaptive management practices.

Methods (En)

The data has been extracted from Google Earth Engine for all South African waterbodies detectable in the South African subset of the Global Surface Water dataset for 2013. Refer to code and research paper for more details.

Files

merged_31082021.csv

Files (336.9 MB)

Name Size
md5:de39d67447aac9af20f2df1d51bc7e49
336.9 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Funding

FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology
40470