There is a newer version of the record available.

Published February 15, 2018 | Version v1.1.0

Data underpinning "Coupling between cerebral blood flow and cerebral blood volume: Contributions of different vascular compartments"

  • 1. Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Description

The data in this archive was acquired to investigate the coupling between cerebral blood flow and cerebral blood volume across different vascular compartments. These results will form the basis of a forthcoming publication. Please reference this dataset (version v1.1.0) if you use it in your work. Wesolowski R, Blockley NP, Driver ID, Francis ST, Gowland PA. Data underpinning "Coupling between cerebral blood flow and cerebral blood volume: Contributions of different vascular compartments". Zenodo 2018. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.1411018. 

This dataset contains measurements of the haemodynamic responses of different compartments to a visual stimulus (8Hz red LED goggles, 19.2s ON, 40.8s OFF). Time course data are cycle averaged for the following haemodynamic properties;

  1. Arterial cerebral blood volume (CBVa) measured using Look-Locker Flow-sensitive Alternating Inversion Recovery (LL-FAIR) sensitised to CBVa.
  2. Cerebral blood flow (CBF) measured using Look-Locker Flow-sensitive Alternating Inversion Recovery (LL-FAIR) sensitised to CBF.
  3. Total cerebral blood volume (CBVtot) measured using bolus injections of a Gadolinium based contrast agent combined with T2* weighed gradient echo EPI.

In addition, weighted mean and standard deviation of the changes in these parameters are presented using time windows of 9.6–19.2s and 40.8–60s for ON and OFF, respectively. Weighting is performed with respect to the number of voxels present in each of the subjects regions of interest.

Time course data were extracted from two different regions of interest;

  1. ROICBF: defined using a CBF localiser
  2. ROICOMMON: defined using the overlap of CBF, CBVa and CBVtot localisers

Furthermore, the transit times for CBF and CBVa were estimated for an average stimulus cycle and mean values extracted using time windows of 9.6–19.2s and 40.8–60s for ON and OFF, respectively. These data were extracted from ROICBF.

Changes

- Additional analysis using a common ROI (the overlap of CBF, CBVa and CBVtot responses)

- Inclusion of transit times for CBF and CBVa for the CBF ROI

 

Files

Files (79.7 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:0a6eb71c69ac9c777886eb97ca858ef1
30.8 kB Download
md5:5a8a3125ebb3949849957f43c1992960
29.6 kB Download
md5:f4325fccb93bbd89d86672b97bface89
19.3 kB Download