Published January 10, 2022
| Version v1
Dataset
Open
Table 1 in Phylogeny, evolution, and classification of the ant genus Lasius, the tribe Lasiini and the subfamily Formicinae (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)
Authors/Creators
- 1. Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of California, Davis CA, U. S. A. & Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Institut für Spezielle Zoologie, Jena, Germany
- 2. Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of California, Davis CA, U. S. A. & Department of Plant Pathology, Entomology and Nematology, University of Idaho, Moscow ID, U. S. A. & Institute for Bioinformatics and Evolutionary Studies, University of Idaho, Moscow ID, U. S. A.
- 3. Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of California, Davis CA, U. S. A. & School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe AZ, U. S. A.
Description
Table 1. Overview of study design, explaining which datasets and analyses were used to answer our primary questions.
| Question | Data | Programme | Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phylogenetic analyses | |||
| 1. Is Lasius monophyletic? | 89 taxa, 959 UCE locus alignments | UCEs: ASTRAL-II | UCE: summary coalescence |
| 135 taxa, 11 Sanger loci | Sanger: MRBAYES | 135 taxa, 11 Sanger loci: Bayesian tree inference, and maximum likelihood bootstrap | |
| 55 taxa, 11 Sanger loci | 3.2.6, IQ-TREE | ||
| 55 taxa, 11 Sanger loci: stepping stone, concordance factor | |||
| 2. Are the subgenera of Lasius monophyletic? | 55 taxa, 11 Sanger loci | MRBAYES 3.2.6, IQ-TREE | Bayesian: Bayesian tree inference, stepping stone ML; maximum likelihood bootstrap, concordance factor |
| 3. What are the relationships of fossil Formicinae? | 154 taxa: 11 Sanger loci for 135 extant taxa, and 110 binary morphological characters for 136 extant and 18 extinct taxa | MRBAYES 3.2.6 | Tree search: (clock vs nonclock; morphology-only vs combined data) |
| Evolutionary history | |||
| 4. Under what palaeoclimatological conditions and where biogeographically did the Lasiini and its internal clades originate? | 135 extant taxon, 11 Sanger loci chronogram trimmed from 154 taxon tree generated in Question 3 | BIOGEOBEARS | BIOGEOBEARS: several models (with and without +J) |
| 5. What was the evolutionary sequence of transformation for taxonomically important characters and life-history traits? | 135 taxon chronogram from Question 4, 5 binary morphological characters and 1 ternary morphological character; 21 taxon chronogram trimmed from Question 3, 2 binary life-history traits | R (ape) | ace with ER (equal rates) versus |
| Taxonomy | |||
| 6. What are the morphological states that define the Lasiini and focal clades therein? | Qualitative comparisons (various) | Qualitative: n/a | Qualitative: Key + Tabulation |
| Morphometrics (104 specimens, 56 spp.) | Quantitative: R | Quantitative: Plotting | |
| (ggplot) |
Notes
Files
Files
(3.0 kB)
| Name | Size | |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:4920131146425885bbc55074c3f2d5c1
|
3.0 kB | Download |
System files
(7.9 kB)
| Name | Size | |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:2587039882638ed95051d9ada4b3c03b
|
7.9 kB | Download |
Additional details
Identifiers
Related works
- Is part of
- Journal article: 10.1111/syen.12522 (DOI)
- Journal article: urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:FF80FFD14372FF82FFF5FF95FF99D837 (LSID)
- Journal article: http://publication.plazi.org/id/FF80FFD14372FF82FFF5FF95FF99D837 (URL)
- Journal article: http://zenodo.org/record/5975346 (URL)