Published August 2024 | Version v2
Journal article Open

FACULTY PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT ON INSTRUCTIONAL PRACTICES: BASIS FOR TEACHING PEDAGOGY

Authors/Creators

  • 1. University of Caloocan City

Description

The research study aims to identify and explore the faculty professional development on instructional practices as a basis for teaching pedagogy. Mixed methods are the research designed utilized in the study from the result of triangulation that deals with Focus Group Discussion (FGD). Hence, purposive sampling technique is used in the sample population process. It is used based on the pre-defined criteria of the research process. The study composed One Hundred Seventy-Five (175) respondents only. Results indicate that faculty development on instructional practices for teaching pedagogy among the respondents express expertise success of development in teaching through student learning and evaluation, show that individual skills on teaching pedagogy provides individual skills to develop, lead, initiate, and plan for the subject area of student learning, show that knowledge on teaching pedagogy provides an insight for student to learn differently in various topics and lessons to be conducted in the learning process, show that expertise on teaching pedagogy helps for teaching the subject didactics and learning inside the classroom, and show that characteristics of a faculty focuses on the various instructional practices and teaching pedagogy as to order of thinking skills, psychological approach to learning, and educational principles in teaching and practices. Findings indicate that there is a significant relationship on the faculty professional development on instructional practices as a basis for teaching pedagogy by the participants.

Files

6. EDUC, FACULTY PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT ON INSTRUCTIONAL PRACTICES BASIS FOR TEACHING PEDAGOGY (1).pdf

Files (420.4 kB)

Additional details

References

  • Fernandes, S., Araújo, A. M., Miguel, I., & Abelha, M. (2023). Teacher professional development in higher education: the impact of pedagogical training perceived by teachers. Education Sciences, 13(3), 309.
  • García-Toledano, E., Gracia-Zomeño, A., González-Olivares, Á. L., & Palomares-Ruiz, A. (2023). Development of Essential Competences for the Success of Inclusive Quality Teaching–Learning Processes in Higher Education. Education Sciences, 13(12), 1243.
  • Gusho, L., Muçaj, A., Petro, M., & Vampa, M. (2023). The Use of Educational Technology to Improve the Quality of Learning and Teaching: A Systematic Research Review and New Perspectives. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (Online), 18(15), 109.
  • Heinonen, N., Katajavuori, N., Murtonen, M., & Södervik, I. (2023). Short pedagogical training in supporting university teachers' professional vision: A comparison of prospective and current faculty teachers. Instructional Science, 51(2), 201-229.
  • Huynh, V. S. (2022). The preparation of teachers and pedagogical universities when reforming the general education curriculum in Vietnam. In International Handbook on Education Development in Asia-Pacific (pp. 1-21). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
  • Ismailova, Z. (2023). Pedagogical Skills and Pedagogical Techniques of the Modern Teacher. Science and innovation, 2(B12), 645-655.
  • Komalawardhana, N., & Panjaburee, P. (2023). Trends and development of technology-enhanced personalized learning in science education: a systematic review of publications from 2010 to 2022. Journal of Computers in Education, 1-22.
  • Luthra, A., Dixit, S., & Arya, V. (2023). Evaluating the impact of faculty development on employee engagement practices in higher education: analysing the mediating role of professional development. The Learning Organization.
  • Mallillin, L. L. D. (2022). Adaptive Theory Approach In Leadership: A Guide to Educational Management System and Mechanisms. European Journal of Education Studies, 9(7).
  • Mallillin, L. L. D. Course Refresher in Assessing and Facilitating Teacher-Learning (CRAFT) in Higher Education Institution: Basis for Improved Professional Faculty Development.
  • Mallillin, L. L. D. (2020). Different Domains in Learning and the Academic Performance of the Students. Journal of Educational System, 4(1), 1-11.
  • Mallillin, L. L. D. (2023). Professional Faculty Development Formation Through Course Refresher in Assessing and Facilitating Teaching Learning. British Journal of Multidisciplinary and Advanced Studies, 4(1), 12-28.
  • Mallillin, L. L. D. (2023) Global Approach in Teaching and Learning Theory.
  • Mallillin, L. L. D. (2022). Teaching and learning intervention in the educational setting: adapting the teacher theory model. International Journal of Educational Innovation and Research, 1(2), 99-121.
  • Mallillin, L. L. D., Cabaluna, J. C., Laurel, R. D., Arroyo, P. A. C., Señoron Jr, T. M., & Mallillin, J. B. (2021). Structural domain of learning and teaching strategies in the academic performance of students. European Journal of Education Studies, 8(9).
  • Mallillin, L. L. D., & Laurel, R. D. (2022). Professional Development System Theory for Quality Education. European Journal of Education Studies, 9(8).
  • Mallillin, L. L. D., & Mallillin, J. B. (2019). Competency skills and performance level of faculties in the higher education institution (HEI). European Journal of Education Studies.
  • Mallillin, L. L. D., Mallillin, J. B., Ampongan, Y. D., Lipayon, I. C., Mejica, M. M., & Burabo, J. Z. (2023). Instructional design for effective classroom Pedagogy of teaching. Eureka: Journal of Educational Research, 1(2), 41-52.
  • Martin, A. J. (2023). Integrating Motivation and Instruction: Towards a Unified Approach in Educational Psychology. Educational Psychology Review, 35(2), 1-35.
  • Myllykoski-Laine, S., Postareff, L., Murtonen, M., & Vilppu, H. (2023). Building a framework of a supportive pedagogical culture for teaching and pedagogical development in higher education. Higher Education, 85(4), 937-955.
  • Oribjonovich, K. H. (2022). Pedagogical skill in the activity of a teacher is a product of individual characteristics. International Journal of Pedagogics, 2(12), 18-22.
  • Thomas, F. B. (2022). The role of purposive sampling technique as a tool for informal choices in a social Sciences in research methods. Just Agriculture, 2(5), 1-8.
  • Tomita, K. (2022). Visual design as a holistic experience: how students' emotional responses to the visual design of instructional materials are formed. Educational technology research and development, 70(2), 469-502.
  • Vela, C., Menchaca, V. D., & Silva, H. (2023). University Faculty Perceptions of Professional Development: Impact and Effectiveness. Journal of Educational Leadership in Action.
  • Xing, X., & Ironsi, C. S. (2024). Implementing action competence teaching model as a framework for achieving sustainable development goals: insights from students. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education.
  • Younas, A., Durante, A., & Fàbregues, S. (2023). Understanding the Nature of and Identifying and Formulating "Research Problems" in Mixed Methods Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 15586898231191441.
  • Yuan, R., & Liao, W. (2023). Critical thinking in teacher education: where do we stand and where can we go?. Teachers and Teaching, 29(6), 543-552.
  • Zhang, W. (2023). Exploring the trust-based learning culture from teachers for student success, growth mindset, and school development. Global Scientific and Academic Research Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 2(3), 1-14.