Testing a trapping protocol for generic surveillance of wood-boring beetles in heterogeneous landscapes
- Santoiemma, Giacomo1
- Battisti, Andrea1
- Courtin, Claudine2
- Curletti, Gianfranco3
- Faccoli, Massimo1
- Feddern, Nina4
- Francese, Joseph A.5
- Franzen, Emily K. L.6
- Giannone, Filippo7
- Gossner, Martin M.8
- Kostanowicz, Chantelle9
- Marchioro, Matteo1
- Nardi, Davide1
- Ray, Ann M.10
- Roques, Alain2
- Sweeney, Jon9
- Van Rooyen, Kate9
- Webster, Vincent9
- Rassati, Davide1
- 1. University of Padova, Legnaro, Italy
- 2. Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement, Orléans, France
- 3. Museo Civico di Storia Naturale, Carmagnola, Italy
- 4. Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Birmensdorf, Switzerland
- 5. USDA-APHIS-PPQ-S&T Forest Pest Methods Laboratory, Buzzards Bay, United States of America
- 6. USDA APHIS PPQ S&T Bethel Field Station, Bethel, United States of America|Xavier University, Cincinnati, United States of America
- 7. Unaffiliated, Padova, Italy
- 8. Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Birmensdorf, Switzerland|Institute of Terrestrial Ecosystems, Zürich, Switzerland
- 9. Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Atlantic Forestry Centre, Fredericton, Canada
- 10. Xavier University, Cincinnati, United States of America
Description
Baited traps are a basic component of both specific and generic surveillance programs targeting wood-boring beetles at risk of introduction to new habitats because of global trade. Among the numerous protocols developed over the years for generic surveillance of longhorn beetles, jewel beetles, and bark and ambrosia beetles is the simultaneous use of black multi-funnel traps set up in the understory and green multi-funnel traps set up in the canopy of forested areas surrounding ports and other entry points. These traps are commonly baited with multi-lure blends of pheromones and host volatiles. In this study, we tested this trapping protocol in areas surrounding eight entry points located in Europe and North America to determine: i) the relative performance of black-understory traps and green-canopy traps among the targeted taxa; and ii) whether the dissimilarity among communities of beetles collected by the understory vs. canopy traps was affected by taxon and amount of forest cover in the traps' surroundings. A total of 96,963 individuals belonging to 358 species of wood-boring beetles were collected, including 21 non-native species. Black-understory multi-funnel traps were generally more efficient than green-canopy multi-funnel traps for detecting longhorn beetles and bark and ambrosia beetles, whereas the opposite trend was observed for jewel beetles. Differences between beetle communities caught in black-understory and green-canopy traps were mainly attributed to differences in species richness in jewel beetles, while both differences in species richness and species turnover contributed to the dissimilarity between communities of longhorn beetles and bark and ambrosia beetle. The difference in the number of jewel beetle species caught by the two trapping methodologies decreased with increasing forest cover, whereas species turnover increased when moving from an urban-dominated to a forest-dominated landscape. Overall, these results suggest that the simultaneous use of both black-understory and green-canopy multi-funnel traps can be considered a very efficient approach for generic surveillance of longhorn beetles, jewel beetles and bark and ambrosia beetles in both urban-dominated and forest-dominated areas surrounding entry points.
Files
NB_article_129483.pdf
Files
(1.8 MB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:e41ce44ee2bb2834399e4c44d077cdb4
|
1.8 MB | Preview Download |
System files
(181.6 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:590f8b1be698690b6a5fc43b4362dd54
|
181.6 kB | Download |
Linked records
Additional details
References
- Allison JD, Redak RA (2017) The impact of trap type and design features on survey and detection of bark and woodboring beetles and their associates: A review and meta-analysis. Annual Review of Entomology 62(1): 127–146. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-010715-023516
- Allison JD, Graham EE, Poland TM, Strom BL (2016) Dilution of fluon before trap surface treatment has no effect on longhorned beetle (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) captures. Journal of Economic Entomology 109(3): 1215–1219. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/tow081
- Allison JD, Marcotte M, Noseworthy M, Ramsfield T (2021) Forest biosecurity in Canada – An integrated multi-agency approach. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change 4: 700825. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2021.700825
- Aukema JE, Leung B, Kovacs K, Chivers C, Britton KO, Englin J, Frankel SJ, Haight RG, Holmes TP, Liebhold AM, McCullough DG, Von Holle B (2011) Economic impacts of non-native forest insects in the continental United States. PLoS ONE 6(9): e24587. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024587
- Bashford R (2008) The development of a port surrounds trapping system for the detection of exotic forest insect pests in Australia. In: Oteng-Amoako AA (Ed.) New advances and contribution to forestry research. InTech, Rijeka, 85–100.
- Bouget C, Brustel H, Brin A, Valladares L (2009) Evaluation of window flight traps for effectiveness at monitoring dead wood‐associated beetles: The effect of ethanol lure under contrasting environmental conditions. Agricultural and Forest Entomology 11(2): 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-9563.2008.00400.x
- Brockerhoff EG, Jones DC, Kimberley MO, Suckling DM, Donaldson T (2006) Nationwide survey for invasive wood-boring and bark beetles (Coleoptera) using traps baited with pheromones and kairomones. Forest Ecology and Management 228(1–3): 234–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.02.046
- Brooks M, Bolker B, Kristensen K, Maechler M, Magnusson A, McGillycuddy M, Skaug H et al. (2022) Generalized linear mixed models using template model builder. R package 'glmmTMB', version 1.1.5.
- Byers J (2007) Chemical ecology of bark beetles in a complex olfactory landscape. In: Lieutier F, Day KR, Battisti A, Grégoire JC, Evans HF (Eds) Bark and wood boring insects in living trees in Europe, a synthesis. Springer, Dordrecht, 89–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2241-8_8
- Carnegie AJ, Lawson S, Wardlaw T, Cameron N, Venn T (2018) Benchmarking forest health surveillance and biosecurity activities for managing Australia's exotic forest pest and pathogen risks. Australian Forestry 81(1): 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049158.2018.1433271
- Carnegie AJ, Tovar F, Collins S, Lawson SA, Nahrung HF (2022) A coordinated, risk-based, national forest biosecurity surveillance program for Australian forests. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change 4: 756885. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2021.756885
- Carvalho JC, Cardoso P, Gomes P (2012) Determining the relative roles of species replacement and species richness differences in generating beta-diversity patterns. Global Ecology and Biogeography 21(7): 760–771. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00694.x
- Cavaletto G, Faccoli M, Marini L, Spaethe J, Magnani G, Rassati D (2020) Effect of trap color on captures of bark-and wood-boring beetles (Coleoptera; Buprestidae and Scolytinae) and associated predators. Insects 11(11): 749. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11110749
- Cavaletto G, Faccoli M, Marini L, Spaethe J, Giannone F, Moino S, Rassati D (2021) Exploiting trap colors to improve surveys of longhorn beetles. Journal of Pest Science 94(3): 871–883. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-020-01303-w
- Collignon RM, Swift IP, Zou Y, McElfresh JS, Hanks LM, Millar JG (2016) The influence of host plant volatiles on the attraction of longhorn beetles to pheromones. Journal of Chemical Ecology 42(3): 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-016-0679-x
- Crook DJ, Francese JA, Zylstra KE, Fraser I, Sawyer AJ, Bartels DW, Lance DR, Mastro VC (2009) Laboratory and field response of the emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae), to selected regions of the electromagnetic spectrum. Journal of Economic Entomology 102(6): 2160–2169. https://doi.org/10.1603/029.102.0620
- Crook DJ, Francese JA, Rietz ML, Lance DR, Hull-Sanders HM, Mastro VC, Silk PJ, Ryall KL (2014) Improving detection tools for emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae): comparison of multifunnel traps, prism traps, and lure types at varying population densities. Journal of Economic Entomology 107(4): 1496–1501. https://doi.org/10.1603/EC14041
- Cuthbert RN, Diagne C, Hudgins EJ, Turbelin A, Ahmed DA, Albert C, Bodey TW, Briski E, Essl F, Haubrock PJ, Gozlan RE, Kirichenko N, Kourantidou M, Kramer AM, Courchamp F (2022) Biological invasion costs reveal insufficient proactive management worldwide. The Science of the Total Environment 819: 153404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153404
- De Groot P, Nott R (2001) Evaluation of traps of six different designs to capture pine sawyer beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Agricultural and Forest Entomology 3(2): 107–111. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-9563.2001.00087.x
- Dodds KJ (2014) Effects of trap height on captures of arboreal insects in pine stands of northeastern United States of America. Canadian Entomologist 146(1): 80–89. https://doi.org/10.4039/tce.2013.57
- Dodds KJ, Ross DW (2002) Sampling range and range of attraction of Dendroctonus pseudotsugae pheromone-baited traps. Canadian Entomologist 134(3): 343–355. https://doi.org/10.4039/Ent134343-3
- Dodds KJ, Dubois GD, Hoebeke ER (2010) Trap type, lure placement, and habitat effects on Cerambycidae and Scolytinae (Coleoptera) catches in the northeastern United States. Journal of Economic Entomology 103(3): 698–707. https://doi.org/10.1603/EC09395
- Dodds KJ, Sweeney J, Francese JA, Besana L, Rassati D (2024) Factors affecting catches of bark and wood-boring beetles in traps. Journal of Pest Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-024-01774-1
- Epanchin-Niell RS, Brockerhoff EG, Kean JM, Turner JA (2014) Designing cost‐efficient surveillance for early detection and control of multiple biological invaders. Ecological Applications 24(6): 1258–1274. https://doi.org/10.1890/13-1331.1
- Fan JT, Denux O, Courtin C, Bernard A, Javal M, Millar JC, Hanks LM, Roques A (2019) Multi-component blends for trapping native and exotic longhorn beetles at potential points-of-entry and in forests. Journal of Pest Science 92(1): 281–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-018-0997-6
- Fenn‐Moltu G, Ollier S, Caton B, Liebhold AM, Nahrung H, Pureswaran DS, Turner RM, Yamanaka T, Bertelsmeier C (2023) Alien insect dispersal mediated by the global movement of commodities. Ecological Applications 33(1): e2721. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2721
- Flaherty L, Gutowski JMC, Hughes C, Mayo P, Mokrzycki T, Pohl G, Silk P, Van Rooyen K, Sweeney J (2019) Pheromone-enhanced lure blends and multiple trap heights improve detection of bark and woodboring beetles potentially moved in solid wood packaging. Journal of Pest Science 92(1): 309–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-018-1019-4
- Fox J, Weisberg S (2019) An R companion to applied regression. 3rd edn., Sage publications. Thousand Oaks, California.
- Francese JA, Crook DJ, Fraser I, Lance DR, Sawyer AJ, Mastro VC (2010a) Optimization of trap color for emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 103(4): 1235–1241. https://doi.org/10.1603/EC10088
- Francese JA, Fraser I, Rietz ML, Crook DJ, Lance DR, Mastro VC (2010b) Relation of color, size, and canopy placement of prism traps in determining capture of emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). Canadian Entomologist 142(6): 596–600. https://doi.org/10.4039/n10-041
- Francese JA, Fraser I, Lance DR, Mastro VC (2011) Efficacy of multifunnel traps for capturing emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae): effect of color, glue, and other trap coatings. Journal of Economic Entomology 104(3): 901–908. https://doi.org/10.1603/EC11038
- Francese JA, Rietz ML, Mastro VC (2013) Optimization of multifunnel traps for emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae): influence of size, trap coating, and color. Journal of Economic Entomology 106(6): 2415–2423. https://doi.org/10.1603/EC13014
- Google Inc.© (2023) Google Earth Pro. https://earth.google.com/
- Graham EE, Poland TM (2012) Efficacy of fluon conditioning for capturing cerambycid beetles in different trap designs and persistence on panel traps over time. Journal of Economic Entomology 105(2): 395–401. https://doi.org/10.1603/EC11432
- Hanks LM, Mongold-Diers JA, Atkinson TH, Fierke MK, Ginzel MD, Graham EE, Poland TM, Richards AB, Richardson ML, Millar JG (2018) Blends of pheromones, with and without host plant volatiles, can attract multiple species of cerambycid beetles simultaneously. Journal of Economic Entomology 111(2): 716–724. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/tox373
- Hanula JL, Ulyshen MD, Horn S (2011) Effect of trap type, trap position, time of year, and beetle density on captures of the redbay ambrosia beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae). Journal of Economic Entomology 104(2): 501–508. https://doi.org/10.1603/EC10263
- Hardersen S, Curletti G, Leseigneur L, Platia G, Liberti G, Leo P et al. (2014) Spatio-temporal analysis of beetles from the canopy and ground layer in an Italian lowland forest. Bulletin of Insectology 67: 87–97.
- Hartig F (2022) Residual diagnostics for hierarchical (multi-level/mixed) regression models. R package 'DHARMa', version 0.4.6.
- Hoch G, Connell J, Roques A (2020) Testing multi-lure traps for surveillance of native and alien longhorn beetles (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae) at ports of entry and in forests in Austria. Management of Biological Invasions 11(4): 677–688. https://doi.org/10.3391/mbi.2020.11.4.04
- Holusa J, Fiala T, Pyszko P (2023) Using ethanol and other lures to monitor invasive ambrosia beetles in endemic populations: Case study from the Czech Republic. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change 6: 1258729. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2023.1258729
- Hughes CC, Johns RC, Sweeney JD (2014) A technical guide to installing beetle traps in the upper crown of trees. Journal of the Acadian Entomological Society 10: 12–18.
- Isitt R, Liebhold AM, Turner RM, Battisti A, Bertelsmeier C, Blake R, Brockerhoff EG, Heard SB, Krokene P, Økland B, Nahrung HF, Rassati D, Roques A, Yamanaka T, Pureswaran DS (2024) Asymmetrical insect invasions between three world regions. NeoBiota 90: 35–51. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.90.110942
- Jactel H, Bonifacio L, Van Halder I, Vétillard F, Robinet C, David G (2019) A novel, easy method for estimating pheromone trap attraction range: Application to the pine sawyer beetle Monochamus galloprovincialis. Agricultural and Forest Entomology 21(1): 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/afe.12298
- Kerr JL, Kelly D, Bader MKF, Brockerhoff EG (2017) Olfactory cues, visual cues, and semiochemical diversity interact during host location by invasive forest beetles. Journal of Chemical Ecology 43(1): 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-016-0792-x
- Legendre P (2014) Interpreting the replacement and richness difference components of beta diversity. Global Ecology and Biogeography 11(11): 1324–1334. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12207
- Lenth RV (2021) Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. R package 'emmeans', version 1.6.3.
- Maguire DY, Robert K, Brochu K, Larrivée M, Buddle CM, Wheeler TA (2014) Vertical stratification of beetles (Coleoptera) and flies (Diptera) in temperate forest canopies. Environmental Entomology 43(1): 9–17. https://doi.org/10.1603/EN13056
- Marchioro M, Rassati D, Faccoli M, Van Rooyen K, Kostanowicz C, Webster V, Mayo P, Sweeney J (2020) Maximizing bark and ambrosia beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) catches in trapping surveys for longhorn and jewel beetles. Journal of Economic Entomology 113(6): 2745–2757. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/toaa181
- Mas H, Santoiemma G, Lencina JL, Gallego D, Pérez-Laorga E, Ruzzier E, Rassati D (2023) Investigating beetle communities in and around entry points can improve surveillance at national and international scale. NeoBiota 85: 145–165. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.85.103904
- Masaguè S, Bruchhausen A, Rozas G, Delavega G, Villacide J, Corely J, Martinez A (2024) The relevance of integrating multiple sensory modalities into capturing devices: The case of the global pest Sirex noctilo. Agricultural and Forest Entomology. https://doi.org/10.1111/afe.12637
- McIntosh RL, Katinic PJ, Allison JD, Borden JH, Downey DL (2001) Comparative efficacy of five types of trap for woodborers in the Cerambycidae, Buprestidae and Siricidae. Agricultural and Forest Entomology 3(2): 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-9563.2001.00095.x
- Meurisse N, Rassati D, Hurley BP, Brockerhoff EG, Haack RA (2019) Common pathways by which non-native forest insects move internationally and domestically. Journal of Pest Science 92(1): 13–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-018-0990-0
- Millar JG, Hanks LM (2017) Chemical ecology of cerambycid beetles. In: Wang Q (Ed.) Cerambycidae of the world: biology and pest management. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, 161–208.
- Miller DR, Rabaglia RJ (2009) Ethanol and (−)-α-pinene: Attractant kairomones for bark and ambrosia beetles in the southeastern US. Journal of Chemical Ecology 35(4): 435–448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-009-9613-9
- Miller DR, Crowe CM, Dodds KJ, Galligan LD, De Groot P, Hoebeke ER, Mayfield AE III, Poland TM, Raffa KF, Sweeney JD (2015) Ipsenol, ipsdienol, ethanol, and α-pinene: Trap lure blend for Cerambycidae and Buprestidae (Coleoptera) in pine forests of Eastern North America. Journal of Economic Entomology 108(4): 1837–1851. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/tov126
- Miller DR, Crowe CM, Mayo PD, Reid LS, Silk PJ, Sweeney JD (2017) Interactions between ethanol, syn-2,3-hexanediol, 3-hydroxyhexan-2-one, and 3-hydroxyoctan-2-one lures on trap catches of hardwood longhorn beetles in southeastern United States. Journal of Economic Entomology 110(5): 2119–2128. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/tox188
- Nahrung HF, Liebhold AM, Brockerhoff EG, Rassati D (2023) Forest insect biosecurity: Processes, patterns, predictions, and pitfalls. Annual Review of Entomology 68(1): 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-120220-010854
- Nguyen HTM, Chu L, Liebhold AM, Epanchin‐Niell R, Kean JM, Kompas T, Robinson AP, Brockerhoff EG, Moore JL (2024) Optimal allocation of resources among general and species‐specific tools for plant pest biosecurity surveillance. Ecological Applications 34(3): e2955. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2955
- Nunes P, Branco M, Van Halder I, Jactel H (2021) Modelling Monochamus galloprovincialis dispersal trajectories across a heterogeneous landscape to optimize monitoring by trapping networks. Landscape Ecology 36(3): 931–941. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-020-01188-1
- Oksanen J, Simpson GL, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR et al. (2022) Community ecology package. R package 'vegan', version 2.6-4.
- Petrice TR, Haack RA (2015) Comparison of different trap colors and types for capturing adult Agrilus (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) and other buprestids. Great Lakes Entomologist 48(1 & 2): 4. https://doi.org/10.22543/0090-0222.2310
- Pinheiro D, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D (2021) Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package 'nlme', version 3.1-152.
- Podani J, Schmera D (2011) A new conceptual and methodological framework for exploring and explaining pattern in presence-absence data. Oikos 120(11): 1625–1638. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.19451.x
- Poland TM, Rassati D (2019) Improved biosecurity surveillance of non-native forest insects: A review of current methods. Journal of Pest Science 92(1): 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-018-1004-y
- QGIS Development Team (2021) Quantum GIS geographic information system. http://qgis.osgeo.org/
- R Core Team (2021) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. https://www.r-project.org/
- Rabaglia RJ, Cognato AI, Hoebeke ER, Johnson CW, LaBonte JR, Carter ME, Vlach JJ (2019) Early detection and rapid response: A 10-year summary of the USDA Forest Service program of surveillance for non-native bark and ambrosia beetles. American Entomologist 65(1): 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1093/ae/tmz015
- Ranger CM, Reding ME, Addesso K, Ginzel M, Rassati D (2021) Semiochemical-mediated host selection by Xylosandrus spp. ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) attacking horticultural tree crops: a review of basic and applied science. Canadian Entomologist 153(1): 103–120. https://doi.org/10.4039/tce.2020.51
- Rassati D, Faccoli M, Petrucco Toffolo E, Battisti A, Marini L (2015a) Improving the early detection of alien wood-boring beetles in ports and surrounding forests. Journal of Applied Ecology 52(1): 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12347
- Rassati D, Faccoli M, Marini L, Haack RA, Battisti A, Petrucco Toffolo E (2015b) Exploring the role of wood waste landfills in early detection of non-native wood-boring beetles. Journal of Pest Science 88(3): 563–572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-014-0639-6
- Rassati D, Lieutier F, Faccoli M (2016) Alien wood-boring beetles in Mediterranean regions. In: Paine TD, Lieutier F (Eds) Insects and diseases of Mediterranean forest systems. Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 293–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24744-1_11
- Rassati D, Haack RA, Knížek M, Faccoli M (2018) National trade can drive range expansion of bark-and wood-boring beetles. Journal of Economic Entomology 111(1): 260–268. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/tox308
- Rassati D, Marini L, Marchioro M, Rapuzzi P, Magnani G, Poloni R, Di Giovanni F, Mayo P, Sweeney J (2019) Developing trapping protocols for wood-boring beetles associated with broadleaf trees. Journal of Pest Science 92(1): 267–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-018-0984-y
- Rassati D, Marchioro M, Flaherty L, Poloni R, Edwards S, Faccoli M, Sweeney J (2021) Response of native and exotic longhorn beetles to common pheromone components provides partial support for the pheromone-free space hypothesis. Insect Science 28(3): 793–810. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7917.12790
- Rice ME, Zou Y, Millar JG, Hanks LM (2020) Complex blends of synthetic pheromones are effective multi-species attractants for longhorned beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 113(5): 2269–2275. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/toaa157
- Roques A, Ren L, Rassati D, Shi J, Akulov E, Audsley N, Auger-Rozenberg M-A, Avtzis D, Battisti A, Bellanger R, Bernard A, Bernadinelli I, Branco M, Cavaletto G, Cocquempot C, Contarini M, Courtial B, Courtin C, Denux O, Dvořák M, Fan J, Feddern N, Francese J, Franzen EKL, Garcia A, Georgiev G, Georgieva M, Giarruzzo F, Gossner M, Gross L, Guarneri D, Hoch G, Hölling D, Jonsell M, Kirichenko N, Loomans A, Luo Y, McCullough D, Maddox C, Magnoux E, Marchioro M, Martinek P, Mas H, Mériguet B, Pan Y, Phélut R, Pineau P, Ray AM, Roques O, Ruiz M-C, Sartoi Monteys V, Speranza S, Sun J, Sweeney JD, Touroult J, Valladares L, Veillat L, Yuan Y, Zalucki MP, Zou Y, Žunič-Kosi A, Hanks LM, Millar JG (2023) Worldwide tests of generic attractants, a promising tool for early detection of nonnative cerambycid species. NeoBiota 84: 169–209. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.84.91096
- Ruzzier E, Haack RA, Curletti G, Roques A, Volkovitsh MG, Battisti A (2023a) Jewels on the go: exotic buprestid around the world (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). NeoBiota 84: 107–135. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.84.90829
- Ruzzier E, Martinez-Sañudo I, Cavaletto G, Faccoli M, Smith SM, Cognato AI, Rassati D (2023b) Detection of native-alien populations of Anisandrus dispar (Fabricius, 1792) in Europe. Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology 26(4): 102137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aspen.2023.102137
- Santoiemma G, Williams D, Booth EG, Cavaletto G, Connell J, Curletti G, de Groot M, Devine SM, Enston A, Francese JA, Franzen EKL, Giasson M, Groznik E, Gutowski JM, Hauptman T, Hinterstoisser W, Hoch G, Hoppe B, Hughes C, Kostaniwicz C, Peterson DL, Plewa R, Ray AM, Sallé A, Sućko K, Sweeney J, Van Rooyen K, Rassati D (2024) Efficacy of trapping protocols for Agrilus jewel beetles: a multi-country assessment. Journal of Pest Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-023-01728-z
- Schroeder LM (2013) Monitoring of Ips typographus and Pityogenes chalcographus: Influence of trapping site and surrounding landscape on catches. Agricultural and Forest Entomology 15(2): 113–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/afe.12002
- Seebens H, Blackburn TM, Dyer EE, Genovesi P, Hulme PE, Jeschke JM, Pagad S, Pyšek P, Winter M, Arianoutsou M, Bacher S, Blasius B, Brundu G, Capinha C, Celesti-Grapow L, Dawson W, Dullinger S, Fuentes N, Jäger H, Kartesz J, Kenis M, Kreft H, Kühn I, Lenzner B, Liebhold A, Mosena A, Moser D, Nishino M, Pearman D, Pergl J, Rabitsch W, Rojas-Sandoval J, Roques A, Rorke S, Rossinelli S, Roy HE, Scalera R, Schindler S, Štajerová K, Tokarska-Guzik B, van Kleunen M, Walker K, Weigelt P, Yamanaka T, Essl F (2017) No saturation in the accumulation of alien species worldwide. Nature Communications 8(1): 71314435. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14435
- Sheehan TN, Ulyshen MD, Horn S, Hoebeke ER (2019) Vertical and horizontal distribution of bark and woodboring beetles by feeding guild: Is there an optimal trap location for detection? Journal of Pest Science 92(1): 327–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-018-1026-5
- Skvarla MJ, Dowling AP (2017) A comparison of trapping techniques (Coleoptera: Carabidae, Buprestidae, Cerambycidae, and Curculionoidea excluding Scolytinae). Journal of Insect Science 17(1): 7. https://doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/iew098
- Sweeney J, Hughes C, Webster V, Kostanowicz C, Webster R, Mayo P, Allison JD (2020) Impact of horizontal edge–interior and vertical canopy–understory gradients on the abundance and diversity of bark and woodboring beetles in survey traps. Insects 11(9): 573. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11090573
- Tobin PC, Strom BL, Francese JA, Herms DA, McCullough DG, Poland TM, Ryall KL, Scarr T, Silk PJ, Thistle HW (2021) Evaluation of trapping schemes to detect emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 114(3): 1201–1210. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/toab065
- Ulyshen MD, Hanula JL (2007) A comparison of the beetle (Coleoptera) fauna captured at two heights above the ground in a North American temperate deciduous forest. American Midland Naturalist 158(2): 260–278. https://doi.org/10.1674/0003-0031(2007)158[260:ACOTBC]2.0.CO;2
- Ulyshen MD, Sheehan TN (2019) Trap height considerations for detecting two economically important forest beetle guilds in southeastern US forests. Journal of Pest Science 92(1): 253–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-017-0883-7
- Wardhaugh CW, Pawson SM (2023) Multi-trap sampling of arthropod communities at ports of first entry informs biosecurity surveillance programs. Journal of Pest Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-023-01714-5
- Wong JC, Mitchell RF, Striman BL, Millar JG, Hanks LM (2012) Blending synthetic pheromones of cerambycid beetles to develop trap lures that simultaneously attract multiple species. Journal of Economic Entomology 105(3): 906–915. https://doi.org/10.1603/EC11434