Presentation Open Access
Voss, Viola; Hamrin, Göran
During an international library conference in 2017, the authors had many productive exchanges about similarities and differences in Swedish and German higher-education libraries. Since research data management (RDM) is an emerging topic on both sides of the Baltic Sea, we find it valuable to compare strategies, services, and workflows to learn from each other’s practices.
Aim: In this talk, we aim to compare the practices and needs of small-scale data producers in engineering and the humanities. In particular, we try to answer the following research questions:
Hypothesis: Our research hypothesis is that small-scale data producers have similar needs in engineering and the humanities. This hypothesis is based on the many similarities in demands from funding agencies on open data and on the assumption that research in different subjects often creates empirical results which are different in content but similar in structure.
Method: We study the current strategies, practices, and services of our respective universities (KTH Royal Institute of Technology Stockholm and Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster). We also study the work and initiatives undertaken on a more advanced level by universities, libraries, and other organizations in Sweden and Germany (e.g. Stockholm University, Swedish National Data Service (SND), Cologne Centre for eHumanities at the University of Cologne).
Results: The talk will give an overview of how we did the groundwork for the initial services provided by our libraries. We focus on what we are doing and in particular why we are doing it. We find that we are following in the leading footsteps of other university libraries. The experiences shared by colleagues help us to adapt their best practices to our local demands, making them better practices for KTHB and WWU researchers.
Limitation: We restrict ourselves to only studying researchers who create data on a small scale since the large-scale data producers handle the RDM on their own.