Published April 6, 2018 | Version 1
Dataset Open

Dataset Effect of hypnotic suggestion on knee extensor neuromuscular properties in resting and fatigued states

  • 1. Sports Center, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Physical Effort Laboratory, Florianópolis, Brazil
  • 2. Institute of Sport Sciences, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
  • 3. Institute of Sport Sciences, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland

Description

The .xlsx file contains individual data from all figures / tables of the associated manuscript and each .csv file contains information from one figure / table.

 

Dataset Fig 2

Table 1. Maximal voluntary contraction force (Newton) from the knee extensor muscles measured before (pre) and after (post) control / hypnosis suggestion

Table 2. Maximal voluntary activation level (%) from the knee extensor muscles measured before (pre) and after (post) control / hypnosis suggestion

Table 3. Peak doublet force (Newton) evoked from 100 Hz paired stimuli at the knee extensor level measured before (pre) and after (post) control / hypnosis suggestion

 

Dataset Fig 4

Table 1. Time to task failure (s) of a submaximal isometric contraction performed at 20% maximal voluntary contraction force with the knee extensors for the control session and the hypnosis session

 

Dataset Fig 5

Table 1. Maximal voluntary contraction force (Newton) from the knee extensor muscles measured before (pre exercise) and after (post exercise) exercise during the control session and the hypnosis session

Table 2. Maximal voluntary activation level (%) from the knee extensor muscles measured before (pre exercise) and after (post exercise) exercise during the control session and the hypnosis session

Table 3. Peak doublet force (Newton) evoked from 100 Hz paired stimuli at the knee extensor level measured before (pre exercise) and after (post exercise) exercise during the control session and the hypnosis session

 

Dataset Fig 6

Table 1. Electromyographic activity (in %, expressed as root mean square values normalized to maximal electromyographic activity measured during the maximal voluntary contraction performed before exercise) of the vastus lateralis muscle measured during the sustained isometric contraction at every 25% of time to task failure for the control session and the hypnosis session

Table 2. Electromyographic activity (in %, expressed as root mean square values normalized to maximal electromyographic activity measured during the maximal voluntary contraction performed before exercise) of the vastus medialis muscle measured during the sustained isometric contraction at every 25% of time to task failure for the control session and the hypnosis session

Table 3. Electromyographic activity (in %, expressed as root mean square values normalized to maximal electromyographic activity measured during the maximal voluntary contraction performed before exercise) of the rectus femoris muscle measured during the sustained isometric contraction at every 25% of time to task failure for the control session and the hypnosis session

 

Dataset Fig 7

Table 1. Motor evoked potential peak to peak amplitude from the vastus lateralis muscle measured during the sustained isometric contraction at every 50% of time to task failure for the control session and the hypnosis session. Values are expressed in %, i.e. expressed as a ratio between the motor evoked potential peak-to-peak amplitude expressed in mV (Table 2) and the peak-to-peak M-wave amplitude expressed in mV (Table 3).

Table 4. Motor evoked potential peak to peak amplitude from the vastus medialis muscle measured during the sustained isometric contraction at every 50% of time to task failure for the control session and the hypnosis session. Values are expressed in %, i.e. expressed as a ratio between the motor evoked potential peak-to-peak amplitude expressed in mV (Table 5) and the peak-to-peak M-wave amplitude expressed in mV (Table 6).

Table 7. Motor evoked potential peak to peak amplitude from the rectus femoris muscle measured during the sustained isometric contraction at every 50% of time to task failure for the control session and the hypnosis session. Values are expressed in %, i.e. expressed as a ratio between the motor evoked potential peak-to-peak amplitude expressed in mV (Table 8) and the peak-to-peak M-wave amplitude expressed in mV (Table 9).

Table 10. Short intracortical inhibition peak to peak amplitude from the vastus lateralis muscle measured during the sustained isometric contraction at every 50% of time to task failure for the control session and the hypnosis session. Values are expressed in %, i.e. expressed as a ratio between the short intracortical inhibition peak-to-peak amplitude expressed in mV (Table 11) and the motor evoked potential peak-to-peak amplitude expressed in mV (Table 12).

Table 13. Short intracortical inhibition peak to peak amplitude from the vastus medialis muscle measured during the sustained isometric contraction at every 50% of time to task failure for the control session and the hypnosis session. Values are expressed in %, i.e. expressed as a ratio between the short intracortical inhibition peak-to-peak amplitude expressed in mV (Table 14) and the motor evoked potential peak-to-peak amplitude expressed in mV (Table 15).

Table 16. Short intracortical inhibition peak to peak amplitude from the rectus femoris muscle measured during the sustained isometric contraction at every 50% of time to task failure for the control session and the hypnosis session. Values are expressed in %, i.e. expressed as a ratio between the short intracortical inhibition peak-to-peak amplitude expressed in mV (Table 17) and the motor evoked potential peak-to-peak amplitude expressed in mV (Table 18).


Dataset Fig 8

Table 1. Rate of perceived exertion (6-20 Borg scale) measured during the sustained isometric contraction at every 25% of time to task failure for the control session and the hypnosis session

 

Dataset Table 1

Table 1. Motor evoked potential peak to peak amplitude from the vastus lateralis muscle measured before (pre) and after (post) control / hypnosis suggestion. Values are expressed in %, i.e. expressed as a ratio between the motor evoked potential peak-to-peak amplitude expressed in mV (Table 2) and the peak-to-peak M-wave amplitude expressed in mV (Table 3).

Table 4. Motor evoked potential peak to peak amplitude from the vastus medialis muscle measured before (pre) and after (post) control / hypnosis suggestion. Values are expressed in %, i.e. expressed as a ratio between the motor evoked potential peak-to-peak amplitude expressed in mV (Table 5) and the peak-to-peak M-wave amplitude expressed in mV (Table 6).

Table 7. Motor evoked potential peak to peak amplitude from the rectus femoris muscle measured before (pre) and after (post) control / hypnosis suggestion. Values are expressed in %, i.e. expressed as a ratio between the motor evoked potential peak-to-peak amplitude expressed in mV (Table 8) and the peak-to-peak M-wave amplitude expressed in mV (Table 9).

Table 10. Short intracortical inhibition peak to peak amplitude from the vastus lateralis muscle measured before (pre) and after (post) control / hypnosis suggestion. Values are expressed in %, i.e. expressed as a ratio between the short intracortical inhibition peak-to-peak amplitude expressed in mV (Table 11) and the motor evoked potential peak-to-peak amplitude expressed in mV (Table 12).

Table 13. Short intracortical inhibition peak to peak amplitude from the vastus medialis muscle measured before (pre) and after (post) control / hypnosis suggestion. Values are expressed in %, i.e. expressed as a ratio between the short intracortical inhibition peak-to-peak amplitude expressed in mV (Table 14) and the motor evoked potential peak-to-peak amplitude expressed in mV (Table 15).

Table 16. Short intracortical inhibition peak to peak amplitude from the rectus femoris muscle measured before (pre) and after (post) control / hypnosis suggestion. Values are expressed in %, i.e. expressed as a ratio between the short intracortical inhibition peak-to-peak amplitude expressed in mV (Table 17) and the motor evoked potential peak-to-peak amplitude expressed in mV (Table 18).

 

Dataset table 2

Table 1. M-wave peak to peak amplitude (mV) from the vastus lateralis muscle measured before (pre) and after (post) control / hypnosis suggestion

Table 2. M-wave peak to peak amplitude (mV) from the vastus medialis muscle measured before (pre) and after (post) control / hypnosis suggestion

Table 3. M-wave peak to peak amplitude (mV) from the rectus femoris muscle measured before (pre) and after (post) control / hypnosis suggestion

Files

Dataset Fig 2.csv

Files (877.5 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:f97a5acbccd4d53f97bb22f2dfa6932a
838.5 kB Download
md5:573d8b941645da7b90b617f791d5bd8f
1.4 kB Preview Download
md5:48cc8afd830512d957eb00e666de5781
1.2 kB Preview Download
md5:3769543085f0a04c5e5c71482499bd76
1.3 kB Preview Download
md5:da4daf2fcc995b88525294f09f8d0371
4.1 kB Preview Download
md5:57510214c5125c17a4b9c941fbf6687f
13.7 kB Preview Download
md5:43ea83df985a34215f7f2030a39f161c
1.5 kB Preview Download
md5:58393e3b8321b546b748fbaddef18eb7
14.1 kB Preview Download
md5:4bedd263cb4fa0c36df7dd655228b836
1.8 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Related works

Is supplement to
10.1371/journal.pone.0195437 (DOI)