Journal article Open Access

Are CONSORT checklists submitted by authors adequately reflecting what information is actually reported in published papers?

David Blanco; Alice M Biggane; Erik Cobo

Background: Compulsory submission of a checklist from the relevant reporting guideline is one of the most widespread journal requirements aiming to improve completeness of reporting. However, the current suboptimal levels of adherence to reporting guidelines observed in the literature may indicate that this journal policy is not having a significant effect.

Findings: We explored whether authors provided the appropriate CONSORT checklist extension for their study and whether there were inconsistencies between what authors claimed on the submitted checklist and what was actually reported in the published paper. We randomly selected 12 randomized trials from three journals that provide the originally submitted checklist and analyzed six core CONSORT items. Only one paper used the appropriate checklist extension and had no inconsistencies between what was claimed in the submitted checklist and what was reported in the published paper.

Conclusion: Journals should take further actions to take full advantage of the requirement for the submission of fulfilled CONSORT checklists, thus ensuring that these checklists reflect what is reported in the manuscript.

Files (350.6 kB)
Name Size
Are CONSORT checklists submitted by.pdf
md5:3ab53216e5369242d01175f8beabb978
350.6 kB Download
1
0
views
downloads
Views 1
Downloads 0
Data volume 0 Bytes
Unique views 1
Unique downloads 0

Share

Cite as