Published February 21, 2024 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Outcomes of control and monitoring of a widespread riparian invader (Tamarix spp.): a comparison of synthesis approaches

  • 1. University of Denver, Denver, United States of America|University of California, Los Angeles, United States of America
  • 2. Colorado State University, Fort Collins, United States of America|U.S. Geological Survey, Fort Collins Science Center, Fort Collins, United States of America
  • 3. University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, United States of America
  • 4. U.S. Geological Survey, Fort Collins Science Center, Fort Collins, United States of America
  • 5. University of Denver, Denver, United States of America

Description

Effective ecological restoration requires empirical assessment to determine outcomes of projects, but conclusions regarding the effects of restoration treatments on the whole ecosystem remain rare. Control of invasive shrubs and trees in the genus Tamarix and associated riparian restoration in the American Southwest has been of interest to scientists and resource managers for decades; dozens of studies have reported highly variable outcomes of Tamarix control efforts, as measured by a range of response variables, temporal and spatial scales and monitoring strategies. We conducted a literature search and review, meta-analysis and vote count (comparison of numerical outcomes lacking reported variances and/or sample sizes) on published papers that quantitatively measured a variety of responses to control of Tamarix. From 96 publications obtained through a global search on terms related to Tamarix control, we found 52 publications suitable for a meta-analysis (n = 777 comparisons) and 63 publications suitable for two vote counts (n = 1,460 comparisons total; 622 comparisons reported as statistically significant) of response to Tamarix control. We estimated responses to control by treatment type (e.g. cut-stump treatment, burning, biocontrol) and ecosystem component (e.g. vegetation, fauna, fluvial processes). Finally, we compared results of the various synthesis methods to determine whether the increasingly stringent requirements for inclusion led to biased outcomes. Vegetation metrics, especially measures of Tamarix response, were the most commonly assessed. Ecosystem components other than vegetation, such as fauna, soils and hydrogeomorphic dynamics, were under-represented. The meta-analysis showed significantly positive responses by vegetation overall to biocontrol, herbicide and cut-stump treatments. This was primarily due to reduction of Tamarix cover; impacts on replacement vegetation were highly variable. We found concordance amongst our varied synthesis approaches, indicating that increased granularity from stricter quantitative techniques does not come at the cost of a biased sample. Overall, our results indicate that common control methods are generally effective for reducing Tamarix, but the indirect effects on other aspects of the ecosystem are variable and remain understudied. Given that this is a relatively well-studied invasive plant species, our results also illustrate the limitations of not only individual studies, but also of reviews for measuring the impact of invasive species control. We call on researchers to investigate the less commonly studied responses to Tamarix control and riparian restoration including the effects on fauna, soil and hydrogeomorphic characteristics.

Files

NB_article_111628.pdf

Files (1.6 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:079dbe759c674d2df3f64e2214f55a3a
1.6 MB Preview Download

System files (213.1 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:5375b5c40e73b0540a708f2f04f395f8
213.1 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

References

  • Auerbach DA, Merritt DM, Shafroth PB (2013) Tamarix, hydrology, and fluvial geomorphology. In: Sher AA, Quigley MF (Eds) Tamarix: A Case Study of Ecological Change in the American West. Oxford University Press, New York, 99–122. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199898206.003.0007
  • Bateman HL, Chung-MacCoubrey A, Snell HL (2008) Impact of non-native plant removal on lizards in riparian habitats in the Southwestern United States. Restoration Ecology 16(1): 180–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2007.00361.x
  • Bateman HL, Dudley TL, Bean DW, Ostoja SM, Hultine KR, Kuehn MJ (2010) A river system to watch: Documenting the effects of Saltcedar (Tamarix spp.) biocontrol in the Virgin River Valley. Ecological Restoration 28(4): 405–410. https://doi.org/10.3368/er.28.4.405
  • Bateman HL, Paxton EH, Longland WS (2013) Tamarix as wildlife habitat. In: Sher AA, Quigley MF (Eds) Tamarix: A Case Study of Ecological Change in the American West. Oxford University Press, New York, 168–188. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199898206.003.0010
  • Bateman HL, Merritt DM, Glenn EP, Nagler PL (2014) Indirect effects of biocontrol of an invasive riparian plant (Tamarix) alters habitat and reduces herpetofauna abundance. Biological Invasions 17(1): 87–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-014-0707-0
  • Bean DW, Dudley TL (2018) A synoptic review of Tamarix biocontrol in North America: Tracking success in the midst of controversy. BioControl 63(3): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-018-9880-x
  • Bernhardt ES, Palmer MA, Allan JD, Alexander G, Barnas K, Brooks S, Carr J, Clayton S, Dahm C, Follstad-Shah J, Galat D, Gloss S, Goodwin P, Hart D, Hassett B, Jenkinson R, Katz S, Kondolf GM, Lake PS, Lave R, Meyer JL, O'Donnell TK, Pagano L, Powell B, Sudduth O (2005) Synthesizing U.S. river restoration efforts. Science 308(5722): 636–637. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1109769
  • Boltovskoy D, Correa NM, Burlakova LE, Karatayev AY, Thuesen EV, Sylvester F, Paolucci EM (2021) Traits and impacts of introduced species: a quantitative review of meta-analyses. [Springer International Publishing] Hydrobiologia 848: 2225–2258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-020-04378-9
  • Brudvig LA, Catano CP (2021) Prediction and uncertainty in restoration science. Restoration Ecology: 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13380
  • Busch DE, Smith SD (1995) Mechanisms associated with decline of woody species in riparian ecosystems of the Southwestern U.S. Ecological Monographs 65(3): 347–370. https://doi.org/10.2307/2937064
  • Carlson T (2013) The politics of a tree: How a species became national policy. In: Sher AA, Quigley MF (Eds) Tamarix: A Case Study of Ecological Change in the American West. Oxford University Press, New York, 287–304. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199898206.003.0017
  • Chew M (2009) The monstering of tamarisk: How scientists made a plant into a problem. Journal of the History of Biology 42(2): 231–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-009-9181-4
  • Chew MK (2013) Tamarisk introduction, naturalization, and control in the United States, 1818–1952. In: Sher AA, Quigley MF (Eds) Tamarix: A Case Study of Ecological Change in the American West. Oxford University Press, New York, 269–287. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199898206.003.0016
  • Clark LB, Henry AL, Lave R, Sayre NF, González E, Sher AA (2019) Successful information exchange between restoration science and practice. Restoration Ecology 27(6): 1241–1250. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12979
  • Cleverly JR (2013) Water use by Tamarix. In: Sher AA, Quigley MF (Eds) Tamarix: A Case Study of Ecological Change in the American West. Oxford University Press, New York, 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199898206.003.0006
  • Crystal-Ornelas R, Lockwood JL (2020) Cumulative meta-analysis identifies declining but negative impacts of invasive species on richness after 20 yr. Ecology 101(8): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.3082
  • Delmas C, Delzon S, Lortie C (2011) A meta-analysis of the ecological significance of density in tree invasions. Community Ecology 12(2): 171–178. https://doi.org/10.1556/ComEc.12.2011.2.4
  • Di Tomaso JM (1998) Impact, biology, and ecology of Saltcedar (Tamarix spp.) in the Southwestern United States. Weed Technology 12(2): 326–336. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890037X00043906
  • Drus GM (2013) Fire ecology of Tamarix. In: Sher AA, Quigley MF (Eds) Tamarix: A Case Study of Ecological Change in the American West. Oxford University Press, New York, 240–255. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199898206.003.0014
  • Drus GM, Dudley TL, Brooks ML, Matchett JR (2013) The effect of leaf beetle herbivory on the fire behaviour of tamarisk (Tamarix ramosissima Lebed.). International Journal of Wildland Fire 22(4): e446. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF10089
  • Dufour S, Rodríguez-González PM, Laslier M (2019) Tracing the scientific trajectory of riparian vegetation studies: Main topics, approaches and needs in a globally changing world. The Science of the Total Environment 653: 1168–1185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.383
  • Egan D (2001) A new acid test for ecological restoration. Ecological Restoration 19(4): 205–206. https://doi.org/10.3368/er.19.4.205
  • Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M, Minder C (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315(7109): 629–634. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
  • Frasier GW, Johnsen TN (1991) Saltcedar (Tamarisk): classification, distribution, ecology, and control. In: James LF (Ed.) Noxious Range Weeds. CRC Press, 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429046483-37
  • Friedman JM, Auble GT, Shafroth PB, Scott ML, Merigliano MF, Freehling MD, Griffin ER (2005) Dominance of non-native riparian trees in western USA. Biological Invasions 7(4): 747–751. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-004-5849-z
  • Gann GD, McDonald T, Walder B, Aronson J, Nelson CR, Jonson J, Hallett JG, Eisenberg C, Guariguata MR, Liu J, Hua F, Echeverría C, Gonzales E, Shaw N, Decleer K, Dixon KW (2019) International principles and standards for the practice of ecological restoration (2nd edn.). Restoration Ecology 27: S1–S46. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13035
  • Gaskin JF (2013) Genetics of Tamarix. In: Sher AA, Quigley MF (Eds) Tamarix: A Case Study of Ecological Change in the American West. Oxford University Press, New York, 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199898206.003.0002
  • Glenn EP, Nagler PL (2005) Comparative ecophysiology of Tamarix ramosissima and native trees in western U.S. riparian zones. Journal of Arid Environments 61(3): 419–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2004.09.025
  • Goetz A, Moffit I, Sher AA (2022) Recovery of a native tree following removal of an invasive c ompetitor with implications for endangered bird habitat. Biological Invasions 24(9): 2769–2793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-022-02805-7
  • González E, Sher AA, Tabacchi E, Masip A, Poulin M (2015) Restoration of riparian vegetation: A global review of implementation and evaluation approaches in the international, peer-reviewed literature. Journal of Environmental Management 158: 85–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.04.033
  • González E, Sher AA, Anderson RM, Bay RF, Bean DW, Bissonnete GJ, Cooper DJ, Dohrenwend K, Eichhorst KD, El Waer H, Kennard DK, Harms-Weissinger R, Henry AL, Makarick LJ, Ostoja SM, Reynolds LV, Robinson WW, Shafroth PB, Tabacchi E (2017a) Secondary invasions of noxious weeds associated with control of invasive Tamarix are frequent, idiosyncratic and persistent. Biological Conservation 213: 106–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.06.043
  • González E, Sher AA, Anderson RM, Bay RF, Bean DW, Bissonnete GJ, Bourgeois B, Cooper DJ, Dohrenwend K, Eichhorst KD, El Waer H, Kennard DK, Harms-Weissinger R, Henry AL, Makarick LJ, Ostoja SM, Reynolds LV, Robinson WW, Shafroth PB (2017b) Vegetation response to invasive Tamarix control in southwestern U.S. rivers: A collaborative study including 416 sites. Ecological Applications 27(6): 1789–1804. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1566
  • González E, Felipe-Lucia MR, Bourgeois B, Boz B, Nilsson C, Palmer G, Sher AA (2017c) Integrative conservation of riparian zones. Biological Conservation 211: 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.10.035
  • González E, Shafroth PB, Lee SR, Ostoja SM, Brooks ML (2020a) Combined effects of biological control of an invasive shrub and fluvial processes on riparian vegetation dynamics. Biological Invasions 22(7): 2339–2356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-020-02259-9
  • González E, Shafroth PB, Lee SR, Reed SC, Belnap J (2020b) Riparian plant communities remain stable in response to a second cycle of Tamarix Biocontrol defoliation. Wetlands 40(6): 1863–1875. ttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-020-01381-7
  • Gurevitch J, Hedges LV (1999) Statistical issues in ecological meta-analyses. Ecology 80(4): 1142–1149. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1142:SIIEMA]2.0.CO;2
  • Haddaway NR, Woodcock P, Macura B, Collins A (2015) Making literature reviews more reliable through application of lessons from systematic reviews. Conservation Biology 29(6): 1596–1605. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12541
  • Henry AL, González E, Bourgeois B, Sher AA (2021) Invasive tree cover covaries with environmental factors to explain the functional composition of riparian plant communities. Oecologia 196(4): 1139–1152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-021-04990-z
  • Henry AL, González-Sargas E, Shafroth PB, Goetz ARB, Sher AA (2023) Functional stability of vegetation following biocontrol of an invasive riparian shrub. Biological Invasions 25(4): 1133–1147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-022-02967-4
  • Hobbs RJ (2018) Restoration ecology's silver jubilee: Innovation, debate, and creating a future for restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology 26(5): 801–805. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12863
  • Hultine KR, Belnap J III, Ehleringer JR, Dennison PE, Lee ME, Nagler PL, Snyder KA, Uselman SM, West JB (2010) Tamarisk biocontrol in the western United States: ecological and societal implications. Frontiers in ecology and the environment 8: 467–474. https://doi.org/10.1890/090031
  • Hunter WC, Ohmart RD, Anderson BW (1988) Use of exotic saltcedar (Tamarix chinensis) by birds in arid riparian systems. The Condor 90(1): 113–123. https://doi.org/10.2307/1368440
  • Jähnig SC, Lorenz A, Hering D, Antons C, Sundermann A, Jedicke E, Haase P (2011) River restoration success: A question of perception. Ecological Applications 21(6): 2007–2015. https://doi.org/10.1890/10-0618.1
  • Johnson TD (2013) Tamarix: Passenger or driver of ecological change? In: Sher AA, Quigley MF (Eds) Tamarix: A Case Study of Ecological Change in the American West. Oxford University Press, New York, 256–269. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199898206.003.0015
  • Kettenring KM, Adams CR (2011) Lessons learned from invasive plant control experiments: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Ecology 48(4): 970–979. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.01979.x
  • Koricheva J, Gurevitch J (2014) Uses and misuses of meta-analysis in plant ecology. Journal of Ecology 102(4): 828–844. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12224
  • Kroll SA, Horwitz RJ, Keller DH, Sweeney BW, Jackson JK, Perez LB (2019) Large-scale protection and restoration programs aimed at protecting stream ecosystem integrity: The role of science-based goal-setting, monitoring, and data management. Freshwater Science 38(1): 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1086/701756
  • Landers DH (1997) Riparian restoration: Current status and the reach to the future. Restoration Ecology 5(4S): 113–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.1997.00113.x
  • Lilian M, Bastien C, Juan José J, Rey Benayas JM, Marie-Lise B, Carolina MR, Alday JG, Renaud J, Thierry D, Elise B, Michel M, Didier A, Emmanuel C, Francisco AC (2021) Conceptual and methodological issues in estimating the success of ecological restoration. Ecological Indicators 123: e107362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107362
  • Mahoney SM, Mike JB, Parker JM, Lassiter LS, Whitham TG (2018) Selection for genetics-based architecture traits in a native cottonwood negatively affects invasive tamarisk in a restoration field trial. Restoration Ecology: 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12840
  • Marlin D, Newete SW, Mayonde SG, Smit ER, Byrne MJ (2017) Invasive Tamarix (Tamaricaceae) in South Africa: Current research and the potential for biological control. Biological Invasions 19(10): 2971–2992. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-017-1501-6
  • Marlin D, Smit ER, Byrne MJ (2019) A successful biocontrol agent in the USA, Diorhabda carinulata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) on Tamarix spp. (Tamaricaceae), rejected in South Africa due to insufficient host specificity. Biological Control 136: e104002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2019.104002
  • Mc Kay F, Logarzo G, Natale E, Sosa A, Walsh GC, Pratt PD, Sodergren C (2018) Feasibility assessment for the classical biological control of Tamarix in Argentina. BioControl 63(2): 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-017-9855-3
  • Mcdonald T, Gann GD, Jonson J, Dixon KW (2016) International Standards for the Practice of Ecological Restoration – including Principles and Key Concepts. www.SER.org [September 10, 2018] https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12359
  • Meinhardt KA, Gehring CA (2013) Tamarix and soil ecology. In: Sher AA, Quigley MF (Eds) Tamarix: A Case Study of Ecological Change in the American West. Oxford University Press, New York, 225–239. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199898206.003.0013
  • Merritt DM, Shafroth PB (2012) Edaphic, salinity, and stand structural trends in chronosequences of native and non-native dominated riparian forests along the Colorado River, USA. Biological Invasions 14(12): 2665–2685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-012-0263-4
  • Mollot G, Pantel JH, Romanuk TN (2017) 56 Advances in Ecological Research The Effects of Invasive Species on the Decline in Species Richness: A Global Meta-Analysis (1st edn.). Elsevier Ltd., 61–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aecr.2016.10.002
  • Morandi B, Piégay H, Lamouroux N, Vaudor L (2014) How is success or failure in river restoration projects evaluated? Feedback from French restoration projects. Journal of Environmental Management 137: 178–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.02.010
  • Moreno-Mateos D, Alberdi A, Morriën E, van der Putten WH, Rodríguez-Uña A, Montoya D (2020) The long-term restoration of ecosystem complexity. Nature Ecology & Evolution 4(5): 676–685. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-1154-1
  • Mosher KR, Bateman HL (2016) The effects of riparian restoration following saltcedar (Tamarix spp.) biocontrol on habitat and herpetofauna along a desert stream. Restoration Ecology 24(1): 71–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12273
  • Nagler PL, Glenn EP (2013) Tamarisk: Ecohydrology of a successful plant. In: Sher AA, Quigley MF (Eds) Tamarix: A Case Study of Ecological Change in the American West. New York, 63–85. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199898206.003.0005
  • Nagler PL, Shafroth PB, LaBaugh JW, Snyder KA, Scott RL, Merritt DM, Osterberg J (2010) The potential for water savings through the control of saltcedar and Russian olive. In: Shafroth PB, Brown CA, Merritt DM (Eds) Saltcedar and Russian Olive Control Demonstration Act Science Assessment. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2009-5247. U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, 33–48. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20095247
  • Ohrtman MK, Lair KD (2013) Tamarix and salinity: An overview. In: Sher AA, Quigley MF (Eds) Tamarix: A Case Study of Ecological Change in the American West. Oxford University Press, New York, 123–148. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199898206.003.0008
  • Orwin RG (1983) A Fail-Safe N for Effect Size in Meta-Analysis. Journal of Educational Statistics 8(2): 157–159. https://doi.org/10.2307/1164923
  • Palmer MA, Bernhardt ES, Allan JD, Lake PS, Alexander G, Brooks S, Carr J, Clayton S, Dahm CN, Follstad Shah J, Galat DL, Loss SG, Goodwin P, Hart DD, Hassett B, Jenkinson R, Kondolf GM, Lave R, Meyer JL, O'Donnell TK, Pagano L, Sudduth E (2005) Standards for ecologically successful river restoration. Journal of Applied Ecology 42(2): 208–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01004.x
  • Parkhurst T, Prober SM, Hobbs RJ, Standish RJ (2022) Global meta-analysis reveals incomplete recovery of soil conditions and invertebrate assemblages after ecological restoration in agricultural landscapes. Journal of Applied Ecology 59(2): 358–372. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13852
  • Raynor EJ, Cable TT, Sandercock BK (2017) Effects of Tamarix removal on the community dynamics of riparian birds in a semiarid grassland. Restoration Ecology 25(5): 778–787. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12497
  • Rejmánek M, Richardson DM (2013) Trees and shrubs as invasive alien species – 2013 update of the global database. Diversity & Distributions 19(8): 1093–1094. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12075
  • Robinson TW (1965) Spread and Areal Extent of Saltcedar [Tamarix] in the Western States. US Government Printing Office. https://doi.org/10.3133/pp491A
  • Rosenthal R (1979) The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin 86(3): 638–641. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638
  • Ruiz-Jaen MC, Aide TM (2005) Restoration success: How is it being measured? Restoration Ecology 13(3): 569–577. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2005.00072.x
  • Sala OE, Lauenroth WK, McNaughton SJ, Rusch G, XinShi Z, Mooney HA, Cushman JH, Medina E, Schulze ED (1996) Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in grasslands. Functional roles of biodiversity: A global perspective: 129–149. https://www.cabdirect.org/abstracts/19970710553.html
  • Shafroth PB, Briggs MK (2008) Restoration ecology and invasive riparian plants: An introduction to the special section on Tamarix spp. in Western North America. Restoration Ecology 16(1): 94–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2007.00362.x
  • Shafroth PB, Cleverly JR, Dudley TL, Taylor JP, van Riper C III, Weeks EP, Stuart JN (2005) Control of Tamarix in the western United States: Implications for water salvage, wildlife use, and riparian restoration. Environmental Management 35(3): 231–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-004-0099-5
  • Shafroth PB, Beauchamp VB, Briggs MK, Lair K, Scott ML, Sher AA (2008) Planning riparian restoration in the context of Tamarix control in Western North America. Restoration Ecology 16(1): 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00360.x
  • Sher AA (2013) Introduction to the paradox plant. In: Sher AA, Quigley MF (Eds) Tamarix: A Case Study of Ecological Change in the American West. Oxford University Press, New York, 20 pp. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199898206.003.0001
  • Sher A, Quigley MF (2013) Tamarix: A Case Study of Ecological Change in the American West. Oxford University Press, New York. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199898206.001.0001
  • Sher AA, El Waer H, González E, Anderson R, Henry AL, Biedron R, Yue PP (2018) Native species recovery after reduction of an invasive tree by biological control with and without active removal. Ecological Engineering 111: 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.11.018
  • Sher AA, Clark L, Henry AL, Goetz ARB, González E, Tyagi A, Simpson I, Bourgeois B (2020) The human element of restoration success: Manager characteristics affect vegetation recovery following invasive Tamarix control. Wetlands 40(6): 1877–1895. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-020-01370-w
  • Smith DM, Finch DM (2016) Riparian trees and aridland streams of the southwestern United States: An assessment of the past, present, and future. Journal of Arid Environments 135: 120–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2016.08.016
  • Sogge MK, Paxton EH, van Riper C (2013) Tamarisk in riparian woodlands: A bird's eye view. In: Sher AA, Quigley MF (Eds) Tamarix: A Case Study of Ecological Change in the American West. Oxford University Press, New York, 189–206. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199898206.003.0011
  • Stromberg JC, Chew MK, Nagler PL, Glenn EP (2009) Changing perceptions of change: the role of scientists in Tamarix and river management. Restoration Ecology 17(2): 177–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00514.x
  • Strudley S, Dalin P (2013) Tamarix as invertebrate habitat. In: Sher AA, Quigley MF (Eds) Tamarix: A Case Study of Ecological Change in the American West. Oxford University Press, New York, 207–224. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199898206.003.0012
  • Suding K, Higgs E, Palmer M, Callicott JB, Anderson CB, Baker M, Gutrich JJ, Hondula KL, LaFevor MC, Larson BMH, Randall A, Ruhl JB, Schwartz KZS (2015) Committing to ecological restoration. Science 348(6235): 638–640. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa4216
  • Thomas MB, Reid AM (2007) Are exotic natural enemies an effective way of controlling invasive plants? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 22(9): 447–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2007.03.003
  • USDA, NRCS (2024) The PLANTS Database. http://plants.usda.gov [01/17/2024]
  • Viechtbauer W (2010) Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software 36(3): 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v036.i03
  • Vitousek PM, Mooney HA, Lubchenco J, Melillo JM (2008) Human domination of Earth's ecosystems. Urban Ecology: An International Perspective on the Interaction Between Humans and Nature 277: 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73412-5_1
  • Westgate MJ, Lindenmayer DB (2017) The difficulties of systematic reviews. Conservation Biology 31(5): 1002–1007. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12890
  • Wortley L, Hero JM, Howes M (2013) Evaluating ecological restoration success: A review of the literature. Restoration Ecology 21(5): 537–543. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12028
  • Zavaleta E (2000) The economic value of controlling an invasive shrub. Ambio 29(8): 462–467. https://doi.org/10.1579/0044-7447-29.8.462