Dataset related to article "Preoperative diagnosis of periprosthetic infection in patients undergoing hip or knee revision arthroplasties: development and validation of machine learning algorithm".
Authors/Creators
- 1. Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20072 Pieve Emanuele – Milan, Italy
- 2. Adult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement Service, Division of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, Roma, RM 00168, 8 Italy; Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy
- 3. 3 Fondazione Livio Sciutto Onlus, Campus Savona, Università degli Studi di Genova,17100 Savona, Italy
- 4. 4 Artificial Intelligence Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano – Milan, Italy
- 5. IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, via Manzoni 56, 20072 Rozzano (Mi) – Italy
- 6. Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20072 Pieve Emanuele – Milan, Italy
Description
This record contains raw data related to article "Preoperative diagnosis of periprosthetic infection in patients undergoing hip or knee revision arthroplasties: development and validation of machine learning algorithm"
Abstract: Background: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total hip and knee arthroplasty remains an extremely challenging and relatively high complication. This study aims to develop, validate and evaluate the use of machine learning (ML) algorithm to predict PJI in patients undergoing revision arthroplasties. Methods: A comprehensive review of patients undergoing hip or knee revision arthroplasty from 1 January 2015 to 31 March 2021 was conducted. Clinical data coming from preoperative patients history, laboratory analysis and demographic characteristics of patients were screened. Final data have been used to train a Logistic Regression model with the aim of predicting PJI preoperatively. Results: 1360 patients were enrolled, 1141 in the aseptic cohort and 219 in the infected cohort were included. ML demonstrated good discriminatory performance in predicting PJI in the selected patients (area under the curve 0.770 ± 0.006 in the training set and 0.720 ± 0.057 in the test set), and identified 3 significant predictors of PJI. Conclusion: ML algorithm trained using preoperative clinical data accurately predicted PJI. The incorporation of ML models into preoperative assessment of patients undergoing prosthetic revision procedures are useful in providing specific risk assessment to aid individualised counselling, shared decision making and presurgical optimization.
Keywords: Artificial intelligence; Arthroplasty; Deep machine learning; Hip; Knee; Periprosthetic joint infection.