Published February 7, 2024 | Version v1
Journal article Open

DNA taxonomy reveals high species diversity among the stygobiont genus Metastenasellus (Crustacea, Isopoda) in African groundwater

  • 1. Université d'Abomey-Calavi, Abomey-Calavi, Benin
  • 2. University of Bamenda, Bambili, Cameroon
  • 3. Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Taxonomy and Phylogeny, Brussels, Belgium
  • 4. Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium|Interuniversity Institute of Bioinformatics in Brussels, Brussels, Belgium

Description

This study aimed to explore the species diversity within the isopod genus Metastenasellus in Benin and Cameroon. Compared to other parts of the world, the described diversity of stygobiotic crustaceans in Africa is low due to a dearth of studies and taxonomic expertise. However, recent research activities in Benin and Cameroon suggest higher groundwater diversity than previously envisioned. Recent sampling campaigns in these countries have shown that Metastenasellus is a major group in the underground aquatic environment. The accumulation of biological material provided an opportunity to explore species diversity within the genus using a DNA taxonomy approach based on the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene fragment.

Despite the limitations of using a single-locus approach for species delimitation, an overview of the diversity within the genus Metastenasellus was obtained, revealing the presence of 23 distinct lineages. Several elements suggest that most, if not all, of these lineages represent valid species. These include high genetic distances between lineages, morphologically distinct species separated by genetic distances of the same order of magnitude as between other described lineages, and the coexistence of different lineages at the same stations.

Despite a limited sampling effort, these first results indicate a high level of species diversity and endemism within Metastenasellus in the studied regions. The narrow geographic distribution of the lineages suggests strong isolation and limited dispersal abilities. This study highlights the potential for discovering a significant number of new species within this genus and emphasizes the need for further research to uncover the extent of diversity in African stygobiotic isopods.

Files

SB_article_113022.pdf

Files (2.8 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:69e37b0f6b79307239180392dab0c62c
2.8 MB Preview Download

System files (219.4 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:0dfbf8535ae48dad48ef21b5380658a1
219.4 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

References

  • Astrin JJ, Stüben PE (2008) Phylogeny in cryptic weevils: molecules, morphology and new genera of western Palaearctic Cryptorhynchinae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Invertebrate Systematics 22: 503–522. https://doi.org/10.1071/IS07057
  • Borko Š, Trontelj P, Seehausen O, Moškrič A, Fišer C (2021) A subterranean adaptive radiation of amphipods in Europe. Nature Communications 12: e3688. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24023-w
  • Botosaneanu L (1986) Stygofauna Mundi. A Faunistic, Distributional, and Ecological Synthesis of the World Fauna Inhabiting Subterranean Waters. E. J. Brill, Leiden, 740 pp. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004631977
  • Bouckaert R, Vaughan TG, Barido-Sottani J, Duchene S, Fourment M, Gavryushkina A, Heled J, Jones G, Kuhnert D, De Maio N, Matschiner M, Mendes FK, Muller NF, Ogilvie HA, du Plessis L, Popinga A, Rambaut A, Rasmussen D, Siveroni I, Suchard MA, Wu CH, Xie D, Zhang C, Stadler T, Drummond AJ (2019) BEAST 2.5: An advanced software platform for Bayesian evolutionary analysis. PLoS Computational Biology 15: e1006650. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006650
  • Boutin C, Boulal M, Boulanouar M, Coineau N, Ghlala A, Merzoug D, Messouli M, Yacoubi-Khebiza M (2011) Importance dans les zones arides et semi-arides, de la biodiversité des faunes aquatiques souterraines. In: Séminaire international sur la biodiversité faunistique en zones arides et semi-arides, 22–24 novembre 2009. Actes du Séminaire international sur la biodiversité faunistique en zones arides et semi-arides, Université Kasdi Merbah, Ouargla, Algérie, 132–149.
  • Boutin C, Boulanouar M (1983) Méthodes de capture de la faune stygobie. Expérimentation de différents types de pièges appâtés dans les puits de Marrakech. Bulletin de la Faculté des Sciences de Marrakech 2: 5–21.
  • BURGÉAP (1981) La Construction des Puits en Afrique Tropicale. Ministère de la Coopération au Développement, République française, Paris, 204 pp.
  • Cvetkov L (1968) Un filet phréatobiologique. Bulletin de l'Institut de Zoologie et Musée Académie Bulgare des Sciences Section Biologie XXVII: 215–218.
  • de Queiroz K (2007) Species concepts and species delimitation. Systematic Biology 56: 879–886. https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150701701083
  • Dellicour S, Flot J-F (2015) Delimiting species-poor data sets using single molecular markers: A study of barcode gaps, haplowebs and GMYC. Systematic Biology 64: 900–908. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syu130
  • Dellicour S, Flot JF (2018) The hitchhiker's guide to single-locus species delimitation. Molecular Ecology Resources 18: 1234–1246. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12908
  • Dole-Olivier M-J, Malard F, Ferreira D, Gibert J (2005) Biodiversité dans les eaux souterraines. La Houille Blanche 3: 39–44. https://doi.org/10.1051/lhb:200503005
  • Edgar RC (2004) MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinformatics 5: e113. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-5-113
  • Eme D, Zagmajster M, Delić T, Fišer C, Flot J-F, Konecny-Dupré L, Pálsson S, Stoch F, Zakšek V, Douady CJ, Malard F (2018) Do cryptic species matter in macroecology? Sequencing European groundwater crustaceans yields smaller ranges but does not challenge biodiversity determinants. Ecography 41: 424–436. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.02683
  • Ezard T, Fujisawa T, Barraclough TG (2021) Splits: species limits by threshold statistics (version 1.0-20). https://r-forge.r-project.org/R/?group_id=333 [last accessed on 6 December 2022]
  • Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R (1994) DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology 3: 294–299.
  • Gibert J, Culver DC (2009) Assessing and conserving groundwater biodiversity: an introduction. Freshwater Biology 54: 639–648. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02202.x
  • Gibert J, Culver DC, Dole-Olivier M-J, Malard F, Christman MC, Deharveng L (2009) Assessing and conserving groundwater biodiversity: synthesis and perspectives. Freshwater Biology 54: 930–941. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02201.x
  • Gibert J, Danielopol DL, Stanford JA (1994) Groundwater Ecology. Academic Press, San Diego, 571 pp.
  • Giska I, Sechi P, Babik W (2015) Deeply divergent sympatric mitochondrial lineages of the earthworm Lumbricus rubellus are not reproductively isolated. BMC Evolutionary Biology 15: e217. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-015-0488-9
  • Gunn J (2004) Encyclopedia of Caves and Karst Science. Fitzroy Dearborn, Taylor & Francis Group, New York, 902 pp. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203483855
  • Halse SA, Scanlon MD, Cocking JS, Barron HJ, Richardson JB, Eberhard SM (2014) Pilbara stygofauna: deep groundwater of an arid landscape contains globally significant radiation of biodiversity. Records of the Western Australian Museum Supplement 78: 443–483. https://doi.org/10.18195/issn.0313-122x.78(2).2014.443-483
  • Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, deWaard JR (2003) Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 270: 313–321. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.20022218
  • Hoang DT, Chernomor O, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ, Vinh LS (2018) UFBoot2: Improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Molecular Biology and Evolution 35: 518–522. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msx281
  • Iepure S, Bădăluţă C-A, Moldovan OT (2021) An annotated checklist of groundwater Cyclopoida and Harpacticoida (Crustacea, Copepoda) from Romania with notes on their distribution and ecology. Subterranean Biology 41: 87–108. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.41.72542
  • Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TKF, von Haeseler A, Jermiin LS (2017) ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nature Methods 14: 587–589. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4285
  • Kapli P, Lutteropp S, Zhang J, Kobert K, Pavlidis P, Stamatakis A, Flouri T (2017) Multi-rate Poisson tree processes for single-locus species delimitation under maximum likelihood and Markov chain Monte Carlo. Bioinformatics 33: 1630–1638. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btx025
  • Lagnika M (2015) Diversité faunistique et qualité de l'eau des puits dans les communes de Lokossa, Parakou et Pobè au Bénin. PhD, Cotonou, Bénin: Université d'Abomey-Calavi.
  • Lagnika M, Ibikounlé M, Mazou F, Sakiti NG, Boutin C (2014) Diversité faunistique et qualité physico-chimique de l'eau des puits à Parakou (Bénin, Afrique de l'Ouest). Bulletin de la Société d'Histoire Naturelle de Toulouse 150: 59–72.
  • Lefébure T, Douady CJJ, Gouy M, Gibert J (2006) Relationship between morphological taxonomy and molecular divergence within Crustacea: Proposal of a molecular threshold to help species delimitation. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 40: 435–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2006.03.014
  • Leliaert F, Verbruggen H, Vanormelingen P, Steen F, López-Bautista JM, Zuccarello GC, De Clerck O (2014) DNA-based species delimitation in algae. European Journal of Phycology 49: 179–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/09670262.2014.904524
  • Magniez G (1966) Contribution à la systématique des Stenaselinae d'Afrique (Crustacés, Asellotes). International Journal of Speleology 2: 173–190. https://doi.org/10.5038/1827-806X.2.1.17
  • Magniez G (1979) Un Sténasellide phréatique de Côte-d'Ivoire: Metastenasellus tarrissei n. sp. (Crustacé Isopode Asellote). Bulletin scientifique de Bourgogne 32: 97–106.
  • Magniez G, Henry J-P (1983) Introduction pratique à la systématique des organismes des eaux continentales françaises – 4. Crustacés Isopodes (principalement Asellotes). Publications de la Société Linnéenne de Lyon 52(10): 319–357. https://doi.org/10.3406/linly.1983.10613
  • Magniez GJ (1999) A review of the family Stenasellidae (Isopoda, Asellota, Aselloidea) of underground waters. Crustaceana 72: 837–848. https://doi.org/10.1163/156854099503988
  • Malard F, Machado EG, Casane D, Cooper S, Fišer C, Eme D (2023) Dispersal and geographic range size in groundwater. In: Malard F, Griebler C, Rétaux S (Eds) Groundwater Ecology and Evolution. Academic Press, 185–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819119-4.15003-6
  • Martin P, Lagnika M, Ibikounle M (2019) Biodiversité des invertébrés des eaux souterraines du Bénin : ouvrir la voie aux outils d'évaluation et de suivi de la qualité des eaux. In: 7ème colloque des sciences, cultures et technologies, 16–21 septembre 2019. Université d'Abomey Calavi, Campus universitaire d'Abomey Calavi, Bénin, 299 pp.
  • Martinsson S, Klinth M, Erseus C (2020) Testing species hypotheses for Fridericia magna, an enchytraeid worm (Annelida: Clitellata) with great mitochondrial variation. BMC Ecology and Evolution 20: e116. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-020-01678-5
  • Morvan C, Malard F, Paradis E, Lefébure T, Konecny-Dupré L, Douady CJ (2013) Timetree of Aselloidea reveals species diversification dynamics in groundwater. Systematic Biology 62: 512–522. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syt015
  • Nana Nkemegni G, Zébazé Togouet SH, Fomena A, Pountougnigni Oumarou F, Piscart C (2015) Aquatic invertebrate fauna of wells in a tropical mountain climate, western Cameroon. African Journal of Aquatic Science 40: 393–401. https://doi.org/10.2989/16085914.2015.1113922
  • NCBI Resource Coordinators (2016) Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Research 44: D7–D19. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv1290
  • Nguyen LT, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ (2015) IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 32: 268–274. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msu300
  • Pons J, Barraclough TG, Gomez-Zurita J, Cardoso A, Duran DP, Hazell S, Kamoun S, Sumlin WD, Vogler AP (2006) Sequence-based species delimitation for the DNA taxonomy of undescribed insects. Systematic Biology 55: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150600852011
  • Pountougnigni OF, Piscart C, Sob Nangou PB, Zebaze Togouet SH (2021) Distribution of Stenasellidae in Africa and description of a new species of Metastenasellus from Cameroonian groundwaters. Subterranean Biology 40: 175–194. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.40.76301
  • Puillandre N, Brouillet S, Achaz G (2021) ASAP: assemble species by automatic partitioning. Molecular Ecology Resources 21: 609–620. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13281
  • Rambaut A, Suchard MA, Xie W, Drummond AJ (2021) Tracer v1.7.2. https://github.com/beast-dev/tracer/releases [last accessed on 6 December 2022]
  • Raupach MJ, Rulik B, Spelda J (2022) Surprisingly high genetic divergence of the mitochondrial DNA barcode fragment (COI) within Central European woodlice species (Crustacea, Isopoda, Oniscidea). Zookeys 1082: 103–125. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1082.69851
  • Stanford JA, Ward JV (1993) An ecosystem perspective of alluvial rivers: Connectivity and the hyporheic corridor. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 12: 48–60. https://doi.org/10.2307/1467685
  • Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S (2021) MEGA 11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 11. Molecular Biology and Evolution 38: 3022–3027. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msab120
  • Trontelj P, Douady CJ, Fišer C, Gibert J, Gorički Š, Lefébure T, Sket B, Zakšek V (2009) A molecular test for cryptic diversity in ground water: how large are the ranges of macro-stygobionts? Freshwater Biology 54: 727–744. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2007.01877.x
  • Tuekam Kayo R, Nola M, Zébazé Togouet SH, Marmonier P, Piscart C (2012) An annotated checklist of freshwater stygobiotic crustaceans of Africa and Madagascar. Crustaceana 85: 1613–1631. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685403-00003134
  • Tuekam Kayo RP (2013) Essai de biotypologie faunistique des eaux souterraines de quelques localités des régions du Centre et Littoral du Cameroun : influence de quelques facteurs abiotiques. Université de Yaoundé I, Yaoundé.
  • Tuekam Kayo RP, Nyamsi Tchatcho NL, Noah Ewoti VO, Chinche SB, Nziéleu Tchapgnouo JG, Pountougnigni Oumarou F, Zébazé Togouet SH (2021) Physicochemical characterization, dynamics abundance bacteriological and aquatic fauna of groundwater in the city of Mbalmayo (Cameroon). Journal of Biodiversity and Environmental Sciences 13: 1–15.
  • Zébazé Togouet SH, Boulanouar M, Njiné T, Boutin C (2013) First discovery of a Stenasellidae (Crustacea, Isopoda, Aselloidea) in the ground waters of Cameroon (Central Africa): description, origin and palaeogeographic implications of Metastenasellus camerounensis n. sp. Bulletin de la Société d'Histoire Naturelle de Toulouse 149: 153–166.
  • Zébazé Togouet SH, Boutin C, Njiné T, Kemka N, Nola M, Foto Menbohan S (2009) First data on the groundwater quality and aquatic fauna of some wells and springs from Yaounde (Cameroon). European journal of water quality 40: 51–74. https://doi.org/10.1051/water/2009005
  • Zhang J, Kapli P, Pavlidis P, Stamatakis A (2013) A general species delimitation method with applications to phylogenetic placements. Bioinformatics 29: 2869–2876. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btt499