World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology
Published April 22, 2009 | Version 5514
Journal article Open

An Automated Method to Segment and Classify Masses in Mammograms

Description

Mammography is the most effective procedure for an early diagnosis of the breast cancer. Nowadays, people are trying to find a way or method to support as much as possible to the radiologists in diagnosis process. The most popular way is now being developed is using Computer-Aided Detection (CAD) system to process the digital mammograms and prompt the suspicious region to radiologist. In this paper, an automated CAD system for detection and classification of massive lesions in mammographic images is presented. The system consists of three processing steps: Regions-Of- Interest detection, feature extraction and classification. Our CAD system was evaluated on Mini-MIAS database consisting 322 digitalized mammograms. The CAD system-s performance is evaluated using Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) and Freeresponse ROC (FROC) curves. The archived results are 3.47 false positives per image (FPpI) and sensitivity of 85%.

Files

5514.pdf

Files (589.8 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:4d06738c80781dee3f0eefe3d78a2aa8
589.8 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • R. A. Smith, "Epidemiology of breast cancer" in A categorical course in physics. Imaging considerations and medical physics responsibilities, Madison, Wisconsin, Medical Physics Publishing, 1991.
  • http://bachmai.gov.vn/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id= 771&Itemid=34
  • A. G. Haus, M. Yaffe (editors), "A categorical course in physics. Technical aspects in breast imaging", presented at 79th Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting of Radiological Society of North America, 1993.
  • N. Karssemeijer, J. D. Otten, A. L. Verbeek, J. H. Groenewoud, H. J. de Koning, J. H. Hendriks, and R. Holland, "Computer-aided detection versus independent double reading of masses in mammograms," Radiology, vol. 227, pp. 192-200, 2003.
  • W. A. Murph, J. M. Destouet Jr, and B. S. Monsees, "Professional quality assurance for mammography screening programs," Radiology, vol. 175, pp. 319-320, 1990.
  • C. J. Viborny, "Can computer help radiologists read mammograms?," Radiology, vol. 191, pp. 315-317, 1994.
  • C. J. Viborny, M. L. Giger, and R. M. Nishikawa, "Computer aided detection and diagnosis of breast cancer," Radiologic Clinics of North America, vol. 38(4), pp. 725-740, 2000.
  • G.D. Tourassi, R. V. Voracek, "Computer-assisted detection of mammographic masses: a template matching scheme based on mutual information", Medical. Physics, vol. 30, pp. 2123-2130, 2003.
  • U.Bick and K. Doi, Computer Aided Diagnosis Tutorial, CARS 2000 "Tutorial on Computer Aided-Diagnosis". Hyatt Regency: San Francisco, USA, 2000. [10] http://peipa.essex.ac.uk/info/mias.html [11] N. R. Mudigonda, R. M. Rangayyan, and J. E. Leo Desautels, "Gradient and texture analysis for the classifcation of mammographic masses," IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 19(10), pp. 11032-1043, 2000. [12] K. Bovis, S. Singh, "Detection of masses in mammograms using texture features," in Proceeding of 15th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, pp. 267-70, 2000. [13] R. M. Haralik, K. Shanmugam, and I. Dinstein, "Textural features for image classification," IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cyber, SMC-3, pp. 610- 621, 1973. [14] H. P. Chan, D. Wei, M. A. Helvie, B. Sahiner, D. D. Adler, M. M. Goodsitt, and N. Petrick, "Computer-aided classification of mammographic masses and normal tissue: linear discriminant analysis in texture feature space," Physics in Medicine and Biology., vol. 40, pp. 857-876, 1995. [15] H. P. Chan, B. Sahiner, M. A. Helvie, N. Petrick, M. A. Roubidoux, T. E. Wilson, D. D. Adler, C. Paramagul, J. S. Newman, and S. Sanjay-Gopal, "Improvement of radiologists- characterization of mammographic masses by using computer-aided diagnosis: an ROC study," Radiology, vol. 212, pp. 817-827, 1999. [16] G. te Brake and N. Karssemeijer, "Segmentation of suspicious densities in digital mammograms," Medical Physics, vol.28, pp. 259-266, 2001. [17] Y. Wu, M. L. Giger, K. Doi, C. J. Vyborny, R. A. Schmidt, and C. E. Metz, "Artificial neural networks in mammography: Application to decision making in diagnosis of breast cancer," Radiology, vol. 187, pp. 81-87, 1993. [18] B. Zeng, Y. Chang, W. F. Good, and D. Gur, "Performance gain in computer-assisted detection schemes by averaging scores generated from artificial neural networks with adaptive filtering," Medical Physics, vol. 28, pp. 2302-2308, 2001. [19] H. P. Chan, D. Wei, M. A. Helvie, B. Sahiner, D. D. Adler, M. M. Goodsitt, and N. Petrick, "Computer-aided classification of mammographic masses and normal tissue: linear discriminant analysis in texture feature space," Physics in Medicine and Biology., vol. 40, pp. 857-876, 1995. [20] H. P. Chan, B. Sahiner, M. A. Helvie, N. Petrick, M. A. Roubidoux, T. E. Wilson, D. D. Adler, C. Paramagul, J. S. Newman, and S. Sanjay-Gopal, "Improvement of radiologists- characterization of mammographic masses by using computer-aided diagnosis: an ROC study," Radiology, vol. 212, pp. 817-827, 1999. [21] J. A. Swets, "Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems," Science, vol 240, pp. 1285-1293, 1988. [22] B. Sahiner, N. Petrick, H.P. Chan, L.M. Hadjiiski, C. Paramagul, M.A. Helvie, M.N. Gurcan, "Computer-Aided characterization of mammographic masses: accuracy of mass segmentation and its effects on characterization," IEEE Transaction on Medical Imaging, vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 1275-1284, 2001. [23] D.M. Catarious Jr., A.H. Baydush, C.E. Floyd Jr, "Incorporation of an iterative, linear segmentation routine into a mammographic mass CAD system," Medical Physics, vol. 31, pp. 1512-1520, 2004.