Dataset related to article "Diagnostic performance of microUltrasound at MRI-guided confirmatory biopsy in patients under active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer "
Authors/Creators
-
Maffei, Davide1, 2
- Fasulo, Vittorio2
- Avolio, Pier Paolo2
- Saitta, Cesare2
- Paciotti, Marco2
- De Carne, Fabio2
-
Colombo, Piergiuseppe1, 2
- Pasini, Luisa2
- Zandegiacomo De Zorzi, Silvia2
- Saita, Alberto2
- Hurle, Rodolfo2
-
Lazzeri, Massimo2
- Guazzoni, Giorgio Ferruccio2
- Casale, Paolo2
-
buffi, nicolomaria1, 2
-
Lughezzani, Giovanni1, 2
Description
This record contains raw data related to article "Diagnostic performance of microUltrasound at MRI-guided confirmatory biopsy in patients under active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer"
Abstract
Background: Active surveillance (AS) represents a standard of care of low-risk prostate cancer (PCa). However, the identification and monitoring of AS candidates remains challenging. Microultrasound (microUS) is a novel high-resolution imaging modality for transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS). We explored the impact of microUS TRUS and targeted biopsies in mpMRI-guided confirmatory biopsies.
Methods: Between October 2017 and September 2021, we prospectively enrolled 100 patients scheduled for MRI-guided confirmatory biopsy at 1 year from diagnosis of ISUP 1 PCa. TRUS was performed using the ExactVu microUS system; PRI-MUS protocol was applied to identify suspicious lesions (i.e., PRIMUS score ≥ 3). All patients received targeted biopsies of any identified microUS and mpMRI lesions and complementary systematic biopsies. The proportion of patients upgraded to clinically significant PCa (defined as ISUP ≥ 2 cancer; csPCa) at confirmatory biopsies was determined, and the diagnostic performance of microUS and mpMRI were compared.
Results: Ninety-two patients had a suspicious MRI lesion classified PI-RADS 3, 4, and 5 in respectively 28, 16, and 18 patients. MicroUS identified 82 patients with suspicious lesions, classified as PRI-MUS 3, 4, and 5 in respectively 20, 50, and 12 patients, while 18 individuals had no lesions. Thirty-four patients were upgraded to ISUP ≥ 2 cancer and excluded from AS. MicroUS and mpMRI showed a sensitivity of 94.1% and 100%, and an NPV of 88.9% and 100%, respectively, in detecting ISUP ≥ 2 patients. A microUS-mandated protocol would have avoided confirmatory biopsies in 18 patients with no PRI-MUS ≥ 3 lesions at the cost of missing four upgraded patients.
Conclusions: MicroUS and mpMRI represent valuable imaging modalities showing high sensitivity and NPV in detecting csPCa, thus allowing their use for event-triggered confirmatory biopsies in AS patients. MicroUS offers an alternative imaging modality to mpMRI for the identification and real-time targeting of suspicious lesions in AS patients.
Files
Additional details
Related works
- Is supplemented by
- Publication: 10.1002/pros.24532 (DOI)
- Publication: 36960788 (PMID)