Published January 9, 2024 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Factors related to sound production by the Chinese grasshopper Acrida cinerea during escape

  • 1. Hiroshima City Insectarium, Hiroshima, Japan|Kyusyu University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • 2. Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan|Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka, Japan

Description

Many grasshopper species produce conspicuous sounds while escaping from approaching predators; however, they occasionally escape without producing sounds. The Chinese grasshopper, Acrida cinerea, often exhibits noisy escape behavior. Therefore, a field experiment was conducted using A. cinerea to identify factors related to the production of sound during escape. This study utilized a predator model with an investigator approaching A. cinerea three times. We examined the relationship between the production of sound during escape and the following factors: ambient temperature and relative humidity as environmental factors; sex, body length, body weight, and limb autotomy as prey traits; and the repeated approach as a predator trait. The relationships between noisy escape and flight initiation distance (i.e., predator-prey distance when the prey initiates the escape), distance fled (i.e., distance the prey covered during the escape), and the mode of locomotion during escape (i.e., flying or jumping) were also examined. Noisy escape was observed only in males that escaped by flying, whereas the females and males that escaped by jumping invariably escaped silently. Among males that flew, noisy escape was related to ambient temperature, limb autotomy, and distance fled. The proportion that produced sound increased in parallel with the ambient temperature and distance fled. This proportion was lower among individuals that had autotomized one of their hind legs. These results indicate that noisy escape behavior is most frequent in healthy male A. cinerea under warm conditions.

Files

JOR_article_100865.pdf

Files (1.3 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:cf22601e34104cd7eddade8e98c36ed4
1.3 MB Preview Download

System files (97.5 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:6e379d1d8364c1fdf61fd914391ed779
97.5 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

References

  • Bateman PW, Fleming PA (2011) Failure to launch? The influence of limb autotomy on the escape behavior of a semiaquatic grasshopper Paroxya atlantica (Acrididae). Behavioral Ecology 22: 763–768. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arr045
  • Bateman PW, Fleming PA (2014) Switching to plan B: Changes in the escape tactics of two grasshopper species (Acrididae: Orthoptera) in response to repeated predatory approaches. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 68: 457–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-013-1660-0
  • Bateman PW, Fleming PA (2015) Invertebrates. In: Cooper Jr WE, Blumstein DT (Eds) Escaping from predators: An integrative view of escape decisions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 177–196. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107447189.008
  • Belton P (1986) Sounds of insects in flight. In: Danthanarayana W (Ed.) Insect flight. Springer, Berlin, 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-71155-8_5
  • Butler EM (2013) Species-specific escape behaviour in grasshoppers. Behaviour 150: 1531–1552. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568539X-00003108
  • Caro T (1986) The functions of stotting in Thomson's gazelles: some tests of the predictions. Animal Behaviour 34: 663–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(86)80052-5
  • Chin DD, Lentink D (2016) Flapping wing aerodynamics: from insects to vertebrates. Journal of Experimental Biology 219: 920–932. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.042317
  • Collier A, Hodgson JYS (2017) A shift in escape strategy by grasshopper prey in response to repeated pursuit. Southeastern Naturalist 16: 503–515. https://doi.org/10.1656/058.016.0403
  • Cooper Jr WE (2006) Risk factors and escape strategy in the grasshopper Dissosteira carolina. Behaviour 143: 1201–1218. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853906778691595
  • Cooper Jr WE (2010) Pursuit deterrence varies with predation risks affecting escape behaviour in the lizard Callisaurus draconoides. Animal Behaviour 80: 249–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.04.025
  • Cresswell W (1994) Song as a pursuit-deterrent signal, and its occurrence relative to other anti-predation behaviours of skylark (Alauda arvensis) on attack by merlins (Falco columbarius). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 34: 217–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00167747
  • de Blainville HD (1835) Description de quelques espèces de reptiles de la Californie, précédé de l'analyse d'un système général d'Erpétologie et d'Amphibiologie. Nouvelles Annales du Muséum d'Histoire Naturelle 4: 233–296.
  • Edmunds M (1974) Defence in animals: A survey of anti-predator defences. Longman, Harlow, 357 pp.
  • Fischer H, Kutsch W (2000) Relationships between body mass, motor output and flight variables during free flight of juvenile and mature adult locusts, Schistocerca gregaria. Journal of Experimental Biology 203: 2723–2735. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.203.18.2723
  • Fleming PA, Muller D, Bateman PW (2007) Leave it all behind: A taxonomic perspective of autotomy in invertebrates. Biological Reviews 82: 481–510. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2007.00020.x
  • Foster JA, Robertson MR (1992) Temperature dependency of wing-beat frequency in intact and deafferented locusts. Journal of Experimental Biology 162: 295–312. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.162.1.295
  • Forsman A (1999) Temperature influence on escape behaviour in two species of pygmy grasshoppers. Écoscience 6: 35–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/11956860.1999.11952202
  • Friard O, Gamba M (2016) BORIS: A free, versatile open-source event-logging software for video/audio coding and live observations. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 7: 1325–1330. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12584
  • Guérin-Méneville FE (1832) Orthoptères. In: Duperrey MCI (Ed.) Voyage autour du monde sur la corvette la Coquille pendant 1822–25. Zoologie par M. Lesson et Sainot et (FE Guérin-Méneville), 1826–30 2(2)1, 152–154.
  • Günther A (1884) Note on some East-African antelopes supposed to be new. Annals and magazine of Natural History 14: 425–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222938409459825
  • Kang C, Cho HJ, Lee SI, Jablonski PG (2016) Post-attack aposematic display in prey facilitates predator avoidance learning. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 4: 35. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2016.00035
  • Kuga T, Kasuya E (2021) Mechanism of sound production by the Chinese grasshopper Acrida cinerea (Orthoptera: Acrididae) during flight. Entomological Science 24: 410–420. https://doi.org/10.1111/ens.12493
  • Lagos PA (2017) A review of escape behaviour in orthopterans. Journal of Zoology 303: 165–177. https://doi.org/10.1111/jzo.12496
  • Linnaeus C (1758) Systema naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Tomus I. Editio decima, reformata. Holmiae [= Stockholm]: L. Salvii, 824 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.542
  • Loeffler-Henry K, Kang C, Sherratt TN (2021) The anti-predation benefit of flash displays is related to the distance at which the prey initiates its escape. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 288: 20210866. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2021.0866
  • Loeffler-Henry K, Kang C, Yip Y, Caro T, Sherratt TN (2018) Flash behavior increases prey survival. Behavioral Ecology 29: 528–533. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ary030
  • Low ML, Naranjo M, Yack JE (2021) Survival sounds in insects: Diversity, function, and evolution. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 9: 641740. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.641740
  • Maeno KO, Ely SO, Mohamed SO, Jaavar MEH, Nakamura S, Ebbe MAOB (2019) Defence tactics cycle with diel microhabitat choice and body temperature in the desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria. Ethology 125: 250–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12845
  • Martín J, López P (2001) Are fleeing "noisy" lizards signalling to predators? Acta Ethologica 3: 95–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s102110000030
  • Norman AP (1995) Adaptive changes in locust kicking and jumping behaviour during development. Journal of Experimental Biology 198: 1341–1350. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.198.6.1341
  • Oertli JJ (1989) Relationship of wing beat frequency and temperature during take-off flight in temperate-zone beetles. Journal of Experimental Biology 145: 321–338. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.145.1.321
  • Orthopterological Society of Japan (2006) Orthoptera of the Japanese archipelago in color. Hokkaido University Press, Sapporo, 687 pp. [in Japanese]
  • Otte D (1970) A comparative study of communicative behavior in grasshoppers. Miscellaneous publications of Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan 141: 1–168.
  • Parmezan ARS, Souza VMA, Žliobaitė I, Batista GEAPA (2021) Changes in the wing-beat frequency of bees and wasps depending on environmental conditions: a study with optical sensors. Apidologie 52: 731–748. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13592-021-00860-y
  • R Core Team (2021) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org/
  • RStudio Team (2021) RStudio: Integrated development environment for R. http://www.rstudio.com/
  • Ruxton GD, Allen WL, Sherratt TN, Speed MP (2018) Avoiding attack: The evolutionary ecology of crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 278 pp. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199688678.001.0001
  • Takaie H (1998) [Insect note] What part of the body does the Chinese grasshopper Acrida cinerea use to make the crepitate sound. The Insectarium 35: 11. [in Japanese]
  • Thunberg CP (1815) Hemipterorum maxillosorum genera illustrata plurimisque novis speciebus ditata ac descripta. Mémoires de l'Académie Impériale des Sciences de St. Pétersbourg 5: 211–301.
  • Umbers KDL, White TE, de Bona S, Haff T, Ryeland J, Drinkwater E, Mappes J (2019) The protective value of a defensive display varies with the experience of wild predators. Scientific Reports 9: 463. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-36995-9
  • Vega-Redondo F, Hasson O (1993) A game-theoretic model of predator–prey signaling. Journal of Theoretical Biology 162: 309–319. https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.1993.1089