Planned intervention: On Wednesday April 3rd 05:30 UTC Zenodo will be unavailable for up to 2-10 minutes to perform a storage cluster upgrade.
Published October 25, 2017 | Version published version
Journal article Open

Explaining alienability contrasts in adpossessive constructions: Predictability vs. iconicity

  • 1. Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History

Description

This paper argues that alienability contrasts in adnominal possessive constructions should not be explained by iconicity of distance, but by predictability due to the higher relative frequency of possessed occurrences of inalienable nouns. While it is true that when there is an alienability split, the alienable construction typically has an additional marker which often separates the possessor from the possessed noun, the broader generalization is that additional marking is found when the possessive relationship is less predictable. This generalization also extends to cases of antipossessive marking and impossessibility. The diachronic mechanisms responsible for the development of alienability contrasts are differential reduction and differential inhibition of a new construction.

Files

Haspelmath2017.pdf

Files (2.5 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:5231a6a571a2bcfcbd3ea21b04804f59
2.5 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Funding

FormGram – Form-frequency correspondences in grammar 670985
European Commission