Published October 24, 2023 | Version v1

Biodiversity of aquatic organisms in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam

  • 1. Papanin Institute for Biology of Inland Waters, Russian Academy of Sciences, Borok, Yaroslavl region, Russia
  • 2. Southern Branch of the Joint Russia-Vietnam Tropical Science and Technology Research Center, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
  • 3. A.O. Kovalevsky Institute of Biology of the Southern Seas, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
  • 4. A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

Description

The Mekong River is the 10th largest river in the world. It is recognised as the most productive river in Southeast Asia and economically essential to the region, with an estimated 60-65 million people living in the lower Mekong Basin. The Mekong Delta within Vietnam is considered a highly vulnerable ecosystem under threat from increasing anthropogenic pressure, such as dam construction and, as a consequence, the Delta is sinking and altering the natural hydrological cycle. Dams also lead to eutrophication and pollution of downstream water from regulated water flux and water stagnation. Another threat is climate change coupled with the lower rainfall, which could lead to an increased risk of drought in the Mekong Delta Basin. Thus, these project data represent an important baseline reference. The ecological health of the Mekong Delta's environment, as indicated by the quality and availability of its water and biological resources, largely determines the economic and social development of the region, which produces about half of the agriculture and aquaculture products of Vietnam.

This paper reports quantitative data on the biodiversity of six groups of aquatic organisms: bottom and pelagic fish, macrozoobenthos, microorganisms, phyto- and zooplankton in the Mekong Delta within Vietnam, as well as data on the physicochemical parameters of water and bottom sediments. The data were collected during 2018-2022 as part of the Ecolan E-3.4 programme within the framework of the research plan of the Joint Russian-Vietnamese Tropical Research and Technological Center. All presented datasets are published for the first time.

Files

BDJ_article_105314.pdf

Files (410.3 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:66f73d9830cd39c5972a186cec1f67fb
410.3 kB Preview Download

System files (122.9 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:f4e9749a1d7245fe82ea77a95665e665
122.9 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

References

  • Balushkina EV, Vinberg GG (1979) The relationship between the length and body mass planktonic crustaceans. In: Vinberg GG (Ed.) Experimental and field studies of the biological bases of the productivity of lakes. ZIN AS USSR, Leningrad, 186 pp. [In Russian].
  • Barnard JL, Barnard CM (1983) Freshwater Amphipoda of the World. II. Handbook and bibliography. Hayfield Associates, Mt. Vernon, Virginia, 830 pp.
  • Borsheim KY, Bratbak G (1987) Cell volume to cell carbon conversion factors for a bacterivorous Monas sp. enriched from seawater. Marine Ecology Progress Series 36: 171‑175. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps036171
  • Brandt RM (1974) The non-marine aquatic Mollusca of Thailand. Archiv für Molluskenkunde 105: 1‑423.
  • Burch JB (1980) A guide to the freshwater snails of the Philippines. Malacological Review 13: 121‑143.
  • Campbell IC (2012) Biodiversity of the Mekong Delta. In: Renaud F, Kuenzer C (Eds) The Mekong Delta System. Springer, Dordrecht, 464 pp. [ISBN 978-94-007-3961-1]. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3962-8_11
  • Caron D (1983) Technique for enumeration of heterotrophic and phototrophic nanoplankton, using epifluorescence microscopy, and comparison with other procedures. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 46 (2): 491‑498. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.46.2.491-498.1983
  • Dang NT, Tay CB, Fam VM (1980) Key to freshwater invertebrates of North Vietnam. Hanoi, 570 pp. [In Vietnamese].
  • General statistics office (2021) Statistical Yearbook of Vietnam. Statistical Publishing House, Hanoi.
  • Glasby C (1999) The Namanereidinae (Polychaeta: Nereididae). Part 1. Taxonomy and phylogeny. Records of the Australian Museum, Supplement 25: 1‑129. https://doi.org/10.3853/j.0812-7387.25.1999.1354
  • Guiry MD, Guiry GM (2022) AlgaeBase. World-wide electronic publication, National University of Ireland, Galway. https://www.algaebase.org
  • Hillebrand H, Dürselen C, Kirschtel D, Pollingher U, Zohary T (2002) Biovolume calculation for pelagic and benthic microalgae. Journal of Phycology 35 (2): 403‑424. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1529-8817.1999.3520403.x
  • Horton T, Kroh A, Ahyong S, et al. (2022) World Register of Marine Species. http://www.marinespecies.org. Accessed on: 2022-1-28.
  • Khoi NV (2001) Fauna of Vietnam. Vol. 9. Subclass marine Copepoda. Science and Technics Publishing House, Hanoi, 385 pp.
  • Koste W, Shiel R (1987) Rotifera from Australian inland waters. II. Epiphanidae and Brachionidae (Rotifera: Monogononta). Invertebrate Systematics 1 (7). https://doi.org/10.1071/it9870949
  • Kotov A, Ishida S, Taylor D (2009) Revision of the genus Bosmina Baird, 1845 (Cladocera: Bosminidae), based on evidence from male morphological characters and molecular phylogenies. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 156: 1‑51. URL: http://zoobank.org/32bb4bc4-3fe1-4ed8-ae9d-d753ab54edfc
  • Le_Meur M, Le_Phu V, Gratiot N (2020) What is the future of the Lower Mekong Basin struggling against human activities? A Review. In: Manning A (Ed.) River Deltas Research - Recent Advances [Internet]. 2022. IntechOpen, 254 pp. [ISBN 978-1-83880-165-6]. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.95010
  • Li J, Dong S, Liu S, Yang Z, Peng M, Zhao C (2013) Effects of cascading hydropower dams on the composition, biomass and biological integrity of phytoplankton assemblages in the middle Lancang-Mekong River. Ecological Engineering 60: 316‑324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.07.029
  • Mekong River Commission (2006) Identification of freshwater invertebrates of the Mekong River and its tributaries. Mekong River Commission (MRC), Vietnam, Laos, 274 pp.
  • Mekong River Commission (2020) Mekong Basin. Open Development Mekong, Vietnam, Laos.
  • Porter KG, Feig YS (1980) The use of DAPI for identifying and counting of aquatic microflora. Limnology and Oceanography 25 (5): 943‑948.
  • Posch T, Loferer-Krößbacher M, Gao G, Alfreider A, Pernthaler J, Psenner R (2001) Precision of bacterioplankton biomass determination: a comparison of two fluorescent dyes, and of allometric and linear volume-to-carbon conversion factors. Aquatic Microbial Ecology 25: 55‑63. https://doi.org/10.3354/ame025055
  • Rainboth WJ (1996) FAO species identification field guide for fishery purposes. Fishes of the Cambodian Mekong. FAO, Rome. URL: http://zoobank.org/554666ae-be5c-4989-948b-ce12d331edbf
  • Reddy YR (1994) Copepoda, Calanoida, Diaptomidae: Key to the genera Heliodiaptomus, Allodiaptomus, Neodiaptomus, Phyllodiaptomus, Eodiaptomus, Arctodiaptomus and Sinodiaptomus. Guides to the identification of the microinvertebrates of the continental waters of the world, Vol. 5. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, 221 pp. [ISBN 9789051030891]
  • Ruttner-Kolisko A (1977) Suggestions for biomass calculation of plankton rotifers. Archiv für Hydrobiologie, Beihefte Ergebnisse der Limnologie 8: 71‑76.
  • Shiel RJ (1995) A guide to identification of rotifers, cladocerans and copepods from Australian Inland waters. Co-operative Research Centre for Freshwater Ecology, Albury, 134 pp. [ISBN 0646224107]
  • Shirota A (1966) The Plankton of South Viet-Nam - Freshwater and Marine Plankton. Overseas Technical Cooperation Agency, Tokyo, 462 pp.
  • Sinev A (2016) Key for identification of Cladocera of the subfamily Aloninae (Anomopoda: Chydoridae) from South-East Asia. Zootaxa 4200 (4): 451‑486. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4200.4.1
  • Thilakarathne M, Sridhar V (2017) Characterization of future drought conditions in the lower Mekong river basin. Weather and Climate Extremes 17: 47‑58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2017.07.004
  • Tran DD, Shibukawa K, Nguyen PT, Ha HP, Tran LX, Mai HV, Utsugi K (2013) Fishes of the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Can Tho University Publishing House, Can Tho.
  • Tri TN (2015) Fish biodiversity research of Mekong River and the change of them by the impact of climate change and socio-economic development. City, Ho Chi Minh.
  • Tsuji T, Ohki K, Fujita Y (1986) Determination of photosynthetic pigment composition in an individual phytoplankton cell in seas and lakes using fluorescence microscopy; properties of the fluorescence emitted from picophytoplankton cells. Marine Biology 93 (3): 343‑349. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00401101
  • Tuan LA, Chinvanno S (2011) Climate change in the Mekong River Delta and key concerns on future climate threats. In: Stewart M, Coclanis P (Eds) Environmental change and agricultural sustainability in the Mekong Delta. 45. Springer, Dordrecht, 456 pp. [ISBN 978-94-007-0933-1]. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0934-8_12
  • Ueda H, Reid J (Eds) (2003) Copepoda: Cyclopoida: Genera Mesocyclops and Thermocyclops. Guides to the identification of the microinvertebrates of the continental waters of the World. Volume 20. Backhuys, Leiden, 318 pp. [ISBN 9789057821264]
  • Vørs N (1992) Heterotrophic amoebae, flagellates and Heliozoa from the Tvärminne Area, Gulf of Finland, in 1988-1990. Ophelia 36 (1): 1‑109. https://doi.org/10.1080/00785326.1992.10429930
  • Weisse T (1993) Dynamics of autotrophic picoplankton in marine and freshwater Ecosystems. Advances in Microbial Ecology327‑370. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2858-6_8
  • Winemiller KO, et al. (2016) Balancing hydropower and biodiversity in the Amazon, Congo, and Mekong. Science (New York, N.Y.) 351 (6269): 128‑129. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac7082