Published November 21, 2014 | Version v1
Working paper Open

Classroom Action Research: Penelitian Tindakan Kelas

Creators

  • 1. Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara

Description

The main purpose of this article is to provide a basic knowledge of classroom action research, systematic proposal and classroom action reporting. The Knowledge is so important because a professional lecturer must be able to understand the problems themselves and their learning environment through classroom action research activities. Various issues in classroom action research, including: planning, process, use of methods, media, resources and learning evaluations and other relevant issues. The final result of classroom action research is the achievement of learning objectives as well as the achievements of the learners. The subfocus of this article is to discuss about understanding classroom action research, initiating action research for learning improvement, literature review, planning and performing actions and how to make classroom action research proposals and reporting.

Files

Azuar Juliandi (2014). Classroom Action Research.pdf

Files (598.3 kB)

Additional details

References

  • Altrichter, H., Posch, P., & Somekh, B. (2000). Teachers investigate their work: An introduction to the methods of action research. Newyork: Routledge.
  • Costello, P. J. (2007). Action Research. London: Continum.
  • Dikti. (2004). Pedoman penyusunan usulan penelitian tindakan kelas: Classroom action research. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
  • P2M-Dikti. (2013). Panduan pelaksanaan penelitian dan pengabdian kepada masyarakat di perguruan tinggi: Edisi IX. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
  • Gultom, R., Rajagukguk, R., & Simbolon, R. (2010). Menjadi penulis tindakan di kelas dan di sekolah (PTK dan PTS): Action research. Medan: USU Press.
  • Hamdu, G., & Agustina, L. (2011). Pengaruh motivasi belajar siswa terhadap prestasi belajar IPA di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan , 12 (1), 90-96.
  • Juliandi, A. (2007). Implementasi cooperative learning dalam meningkatkan kualitas pembelajaran mata kuliah penelitian manajemen. Medan: Pusat Pengembangan dan Peningkatkan Aktivitas Instruksional (P3AI) Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara.
  • Juliandi, A. (2013). Metodologi penelitian kuantitatif: Untuk ilmu-ilmu bisnis. Bandung: Citapustaka.
  • McKernan, J. (2008). Curriculum and imagination: process theory, pedagogy and action. New York: Routledge.
  • Pelton, R. P. (2010). Action research for teacher candidates: Using classroom data to enhance instruction. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Education.
  • Phillips, D. K., & Carr, K. (2010). Becoming a teacher through action research: Process, context, and self-study. New York: Routledge.
  • Sagor, R. (2000). Guiding school improvement with action research. United States of America: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  • Subrata, N. (2007). Pengembangan model pembelajaran kooperatif dan strategi pemecahan masalah untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa Kelas VII C SMP Negeri 1 Sukasada. Jurnal penelitian dan pengembangan , 1 (2), 135-147.
  • Sudarma, K., & Nugraheni, F. (2006). Pengaruh motivasi berprestasi dan strategi belajar efektif terhadap prestasi belajar akuntansi. Dinamika pendidikan , 1 (1), 28-43.
  • Theresia, S. (2010). Penelitian tindakan kelas dan pengembangan profesi guru. Historia Vitae , 4 (21), 14-30.
  • Tomal, D. R. (2003). Action research for educators. United States: A Scarecrow Education Book.