Western Michigan University
Published December 7, 2023 | Version v1
Dataset Open

Instructor Perspectives on APA Style in Nursing Education: Implicit and Explicit Value

Description

OBJECTIVE: Disparities in how nursing faculty teach APA Style can confuse students and the librarians who help them. To clarify faculty expectations of and approaches to APA 

Style, this study seeks to answer the following questions: (1) What do nursing faculty perceive as the impact or value of APA Style? (2) How do nursing faculty teach and grade APA Style? By revealing the unspoken assumptions about APA Style and the value it adds to nursing education, it is hoped that health sciences librarians can more intentionally and effectively support this aspect of the nursing curriculum.

METHODS: A mixed-methods study was designed to investigate potential gaps between nursing instructors' expectations for APA and their teaching/grading practices. The study incorporated an online survey of 75 nursing faculty at 14 Carnegie institutions with nursing programs, as well as qualitative interviews with 12 faculty at those institutions. A grounded theory approach was used to uncover salient themes.

RESULTS: Nursing instructors consistently emphasized the importance of APA for referencing/in-text citations in both the survey and the interviews. When discussing the value of APA Style in nursing education, interviewees stressed APA Style as essential in developing professional nursing communication skills and evidence-based practice. However, faculty expectations for students' APA skills were not in line with their teaching and grading practices.

CONCLUSION: Given the wide range of reporting teaching and grading practices for APA Style, nursing programs should work to clarify expectations for APA Style, and standardize how it is taught.

Files

Abbas APA Study Interview 2021-12-07.txt

Files (537.6 kB)

Name Size
md5:cda4bd2b33786c89f8e526f82ed98811
24.2 kB Preview Download
md5:d769647459651d9d5466b8d11a974d59
114.9 kB Preview Download
md5:a3e0256553b7e0ff520bf8913d9b9727
28.3 kB Preview Download
md5:bea4f124dae96a3df8ec32a26e2eef3d
27.3 kB Preview Download
md5:114d678b424e0994e7612fe2785e9da5
34.6 kB Preview Download
md5:391ec8f6d415b6238e165f8b819e79fa
29.8 kB Preview Download
md5:18b1e76b5c59fea6ef035ad80303fa2b
21.4 kB Preview Download
md5:21c4fe6f61a75d8631acdbcd97c8d114
47.0 kB Preview Download
md5:c6b3ae7b60015eeb684fa0e3f4b14755
1.7 kB Preview Download
md5:74b06b2d40a1dcf407c9e99951c1cd12
10.6 kB Preview Download
md5:dc4651821e1612f055cb283a4ecc1b11
42.6 kB Preview Download
md5:dda5cc6350effd19d6a8a2eb54887f63
43.7 kB Preview Download
md5:24fc15910728003827f24069622ad470
28.9 kB Preview Download
md5:c57f47a28ffb605022e08782650b9c88
38.8 kB Preview Download
md5:823e163878e0f07281431a8674d2d89f
43.7 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Dates

Available
2023-12-07

References

  • 1. Oermann MH, Nicoll LH, Chinn PL, Conklin JL, McCarty M, Amarasekara S. Quality of author guidelines in nursing journals. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2018;50(3):333–40. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12383.
  • 2. Nicoll LH, Oermann MH, Chinn PL, Conklin JL, Amarasekara S, McCarty M. Guidance provided to authors on citing and formatting references in nursing journals. J Nurses Prof Dev. 2018 Mar;34(2):54–9. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1097/NND.0000000000000430.
  • 3. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals [Internet]. 2019 Dec. <http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf>.
  • 4. Brewer BW, Scherzer CB, Van Raalte JL, Petitpas AJ, Andersen MB. The elements of (APA) style: a survey of psychology journal editors: comment. Am Psychol. 2001 Mar;56(3):266–7. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.266.
  • 5. Freysteinson WM. The language of scholarship for novice writers. J Contin Educ Nurs. 2013;44(12):533–4. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20131121-13.
  • 6. Freysteinson WM, Krepper R, Mellott S, Billings DM, Kowalski K. The language of scholarship: how to rapidly locate and avoid common APA errors. J Contin Educ Nurs. 2015 Oct;46(10):436–8. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20150918-14.
  • 7. Beins BC, Smith RA, Dunn DS. Writing for psychology majors as a developmental process. In: Dunn DS, Beins BC, McCarthy MA, Hill GW IV, editors. Best practices for teaching beginnings and endings in the psychology major: research, cases, and recommendations. Oxford University Press, New York, NY; 2010. p. 253–78.
  • 8.Budge GS, Katz B. Constructing psychological knowledge: reflections on science, scientists and epistemology in the APA publication manual. Theory Psychol. 1995;5(2):217–31. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0959354395052003.
  • 9. Madigan R, Johnson S, Linton P. The language of psychology - APA style as epistemology. Am Psychol. 1995 Jun;50(6):428–36. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.50.6.428.
  • 10. Vipond D. The elements of APA style. In: Writing and psychology: understanding writing and its teaching from the perspective of composition studies. Westport, CT: Praeger; 1993. p. 55–76.
  • 11. Walsh-Bowers R. Fundamentalism in psychological science: the publication manual as "bible." Psychol Women Q. 1999;23(2):375–92. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1999.tb00368.x.
  • 12. Long TL. A history of citation styles. Nurse Author Ed. 2019;29(3):1–6. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-4910.2019.tb00048.x.
  • 13. Schick K. Citation obsession? get over it [Internet]! Chron High Educ. 2011 Oct 30 [cited 2 Jul 2020]. <http://www.chronicle.com/article/Citation-Obsession-Get-Over/129575>.
  • 14. Young J. How freshman comp courses have weaponized academic citation (opinion) [Internet]. Inside Higher Ed. 2019 Aug 7 [cited 2 Jul 2020]. <https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2019/08/07/how-freshman-comp-courses-have-weaponized-academic-citation-opinion>.
  • 15. Giddens JF, Lobo M. Analyzing graduate student trends in written paper evaluation. J Nurs Educ. 2008;47(10):480–3. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20081001-05.
  • 16. Morse GG. Faculty application of the American Psychological Association style. J Nurs Educ. 2009;48(10):542–51. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20090610-10.
  • 17. Newton SE. Faculty role modeling of professional writing: one baccalaureate nursing program's experience. J Prof Nurs. 2008 Apr;24(2):80. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2007.06.025.
  • 18. Stellmack MA, Konheim-Kalkstein YL, Manor JE, Massey AR, Schmitz JAP. An assessment of reliability and validity of a rubric for grading APA-style introductions. Teach Psychol. 2009 Apr;36(2):102–7. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1080/00986280902739776.
  • 19. Thaler N, Kazemi E, Huscher C. Developing a rubric to assess student learning outcomes using a class assignment. Teach Psychol. 2009;36(2):113–6. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1080/00986280902739305.
  • 20. Western Michigan University Office of institutional research. Peer institutions: carnegie classification criteria [Internet] [2023; cited 17 Nov 2023]. <https://wmich.edu/institutionalresearch/peers>.
  • 21. Kuckartz U. Qualitative text analysis: a guide to methods, practice & using software. McWhertor A, editor. Los Angeles: Sage; 2014.
  • 22. Kvale S. InterViews: an introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1996.
  • 23. Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Pub. Co.; 1967.
  • 24. Strauss A, Corbin J. Grounded theory methodology. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1994. p. 273–85.