Published May 17, 2026 | Version 1

On the Physical Inadequacy of Singularities and the Unified Frequency-Governed Framework of Extended Classical Mechanics (ECM)

  • 1. Tagore's Electronic Lab

Description

The classical black-hole singularity remains one of the most mathematically accepted yet physically unresolved constructs in modern theoretical physics. Within General Relativity (GR), the internal core of a black hole is formally represented by the limiting condition r = 0, implying L = 0, d = 0, and therefore V = 0. This raises a foundational physical contradiction: if a black hole is claimed to obey the relativistic mass–energy relation E = Mc², then the associated mass (M) must remain physically meaningful, which ordinarily requires nonzero spatial support.

This paper argues that a strictly zero-dimensional singular core cannot be regarded as a legitimate physical object because it forfeits both spatial existence and localized mass meaning. Once the Planck boundary (ℓP = √(ℏG/c³)) is recognized as the lower limit of reliable physical interpretation, the singularity must be understood not as a real object, but as a signal of formal breakdown in the classical geometric framework.

To address this inadequacy, the paper introduces an alternative interpretation through Extended Classical Mechanics (ECM). In ECM, sub-Planck collapse does not terminate in geometric divergence, but transforms through a deterministic, frequency-governed energetic transition:

ΔPEECM ↔ Mapp ↔ ΔMM ↔ ΔKEECM

governed by the intrinsic frequency relation:

fsource = fobserved + Δfsource

Under this framework, the black hole is reinterpreted not as an inaccessible zero-volume paradox, but as a dynamic energetic transformer whose internal frequency evolution continuously maps to its external gravitational footprint. ECM therefore restores physical continuity, preserves spatial interpretability, and offers a conceptually unified alternative to classical singularity-based black-hole ontology.

Files

On the Physical Inadequacy of Singularities_v1.pdf

Files (273.3 kB)

Name Size
md5:cc553a5e93a25f243ff930f17e7c1031
273.3 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Related works

Describes
Preprint: 10.2139/ssrn.6755798 (DOI)
Preprint: 10.5281/zenodo.18825894 (DOI)
Preprint: 10.5281/zenodo.18916393 (DOI)

References

  • Einstein, A. (1915). Die Feldgleichungen der Gravitation. Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften (Berlin), 844–847. (
  • Schwarzschild, K. (1916). Über das Gravitationsfeld eines Massenpunktes nach der Einsteinschen Theorie. Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften (Berlin), 189–196.
  • Planck, M. (1901). On the Law of Distribution of Energy in the Normal Spectrum. Annalen der Physik, 4(553), 1–11.
  • Planck, M. (1899). Über irreversible Strahlungsvorgänge. Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 5, 440–480.
  • Planck Collaboration. (2018). Planck 2018 Results: Cosmological Parameters. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 641, A6.
  • Chernin, A. D., Bisnovatyi-Kogan, G. S., Teerikorpi, P., Valtonen, M. J., Byrd, G. G., & Merafina, M. (2013). Dark energy and the structure of the Coma cluster of galaxies. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 553, A101. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201220781
  • Humpherys, D. (2024). Understanding the natural units and their hidden role in the laws of physics. European Journal of Physics, 45(5), 055802. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/ad61d3