Published March 18, 2026 | Version v1

Risk Minimisation in Public Private Partnership Projects Case Study: Cochin International Airport

Description

Public–Private Partnership (PPP) models are widely used in India for airport infrastructure development, offering improved efficiency and private-sector innovation. However, significant risks arise during the planning phase, which can affect project feasibility. This study identifies and analyses major planning-stage risks in airport PPP projects, with reference to the Cochin International Airport model, and suggests suitable mitigation strategies.

A review of global and national PPP literature, along with expert interviews and questionnaire surveys, helped identify ten key risks: financial availability, regulatory and tax changes, approval delays, economic fluctuation in tamilons, import duties, land acquisition issues, public protests, topographic and environmental constraints, design changes, and coordination challenges. Survey data were analysed using SPSS through descriptive statistics and repeated-measures ANOVA to assess the effectiveness of mitigation measures.

Key strategies include early regulatory engagement, robust financial modelling, stakeholder communication, environmental and social assessments, structured coordination systems, and proactive contract management. This study presents a practical framework for reducing planning-phase risks in airport PPP projects, supporting better project planning and increasing private-sector confidence.

Files

(43-63)RISK MINIMISATION IN PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTERSHIP.pdf

Files (700.1 kB)

Name Size
md5:c9de72878d2dff6b9b5906add0684078
700.1 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • 1. Srinivas, A. V. S. S. S. (2019). Risk assessment and mitigation of international airport projects in Indian scenario. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 6(6).
  • 2. Chourasia, A. S., Dalei, N. N., & Jha, K. (2021). Critical success factors for development of public–private partnership airports in India. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 5(1).
  • 3. Ozorhon, B., & Demirkesen, S. (2015). Managing risks in public–private partnership projects: The case of Izmit Bay suspension bridge. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Construction in the 21st Century (CITC-VIII).
  • 4. Keers, B. B. M., & van Fenema, P. C. (2018). Managing risks in public–private partnership formation projects. International Journal of Project Management, 36(6).
  • 5. Varkkey, B., & Raghuram, G. (2001). Public private partnership in airport development: Governance and risk management implications from Cochin International Airport Ltd. Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
  • 6. Nguyen, D., & Garvin, M. (2016). Risk allocation and management practices in highway PPP contracts: Pilot study of Virginia. In Construction Research Congress.
  • 7. Jokar, E., Aminnejad, B., & Lork, A. (2021). Assessing and prioritizing risks in public–private partnership (PPP) projects using the integration of fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making methods. Operations Research Perspectives, 8, 100190.
  • 8. Doloi, H. (2012). Understanding impacts of time and cost related construction risks on operational performance of PPP projects. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 16(3), 316–337.
  • 9. Darvish, H., Zou, P. X. W., Loosemore, M., & Zhang, G. M. (2006). Risk management, public interests and value for money in PPP projects: Literature review and case studies. In CRIOCM International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate.
  • 10. Chu, J. (2022). PPP model for airport development in China: An assessment of risks and potential solutions. BCP Business & Management, 29.