Prosthodontists no more A labourer: 3D printing in prosthodontics
- 1. International Journal of Dental Science and Innovative Research (IJDSIR)
Description
Abstract
Background: Traditional prosthodontics relied heavily on manual craftsmanship, making the prosthodontist a skilled laborer. The advent of 3D printing has introduced a paradigm shift, enabling precision, customization, and efficiency.
Materials & Methods: This narrative review explores the integration of 3D printing in prosthodontics, highlighting methodologies, clinical outcomes, and future research directions. Relevant literature from 2010–2023 was analyzed to assess the impact of additive manufacturing on prosthetic design, workflow, and patient-centered care.
Results: 3D printing facilitates the fabrication of highly precise and customized prostheses, improves efficiency, enhances aesthetic outcomes, and allows patient-specific solutions. Integration with digital workflows streamlines treatment processes, while material advancements support functional longevity.
Conclusion: The adoption of 3D printing transforms the role of prosthodontists from manual artisans to technological innovators, marking a shift toward patient-centered, digitally integrated prosthetic care.
Files
SHREYA.pdf
Additional details
Software
References
- 1. Katkar RA, Taft RM, Grant GT. 3D volume rendering and 3D printing (additive manufacturing). Dent Clin North Am 2018;62:393-402. 2. Schweiger J, Stumbaum J, Edelhoff D, Guth JF. Systematics and concepts for the digital production of complete dentures: risks and opportunities. Int J Comput Dent. 2018;21(1):41–56. 3. Cristache C M, Totu E E, Iorgulescu G et al. Eighteen months follow-up with patient-centred outcomes assessment of complete dentures manufactured using a hybrid nanocomposite and additive CAD/CAM protocol. J Clin Med 2020; 9: 324. 4. Dawood, A., Marti, B. M., Sauret-Jackson, V., & Darwood, A. (2015). 3D printing in dentistry. British dental journal, 219(11), 521-529. 5. Goodacre BJ, Goodacre CJ, Baba NZ, Kattadiyil MT. Comparison of denture base adaptation between CAD–CAM and conventional fabrication techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;116(2):249–56. 6. Kim K, Lee CH, Kim BK, Mao JJ. 2010.Anatomically shaped tooth and periodontal regeneration by cell homing. J Dent Res.89(8):842–847. 7. Nakao K, Morita R, Saji Y, Ishida K, Tomita Y,Ogawa M, Saitoh M, Tomooka Y, Tsuji T.2007. The development of a bioengineered organ germ method. Nat Methods.4(3):227–230. 8. Ikeda E, Morita R, Nakao K, Ishida K, Nakamura T, Takano-Yamamoto T, Ogawa M, Mizuno M, Kasugai S, Tsuji T. 2009. Fully functional bioengineered tooth replacement as an organ replacement therapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 106(32):13475–13480. 9. Zhang W, Ahluwalia IP, Yelick PC. 2010. Three dimensional dental epithelial-mesenchymal constructs of predetermined size and shape for tooth regeneration. Biomaterials.31(31):7995–8003.