Published May 24, 2012 | Version v1
Journal article Restricted

DNA sequences corroborate Soesiladeepakius as a non-salticoid genus of jumping spiders: placement with lapsiines, phylogeny, and description of six new species (Araneae, Salticidae)

Description

Ruiz, Gustavo R. S., Maddison, Wayne P. (2012): DNA sequences corroborate Soesiladeepakius as a non-salticoid genus of jumping spiders: placement with lapsiines, phylogeny, and description of six new species (Araneae, Salticidae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 165 (2): 274-295, DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2012.00815.x, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.2012.00815.x

Files

Restricted

The record is publicly accessible, but files are restricted to users with access.

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:FFF3FFD82556FFCB93443941FF8EFFD4
URL
http://publication.plazi.org/id/FFF3FFD82556FFCB93443941FF8EFFD4

References

  • Edwards GB. 2004. Revision of the jumping spiders of the genus Phidippus (Araneae: Salticidae). Occasional Papers of the Florida State Collection of Arthropods 11: 1-156.
  • Ewing B, Green P. 1998. Basecalling of automated sequencer traces using phred. II. Error probabilities. Genome Research 8: 186-194.
  • Ewing B, Hillier L, Wendl M, Green P. 1998. Basecalling of automated sequencer traces using phred. I. Accuracy assessment. Genome Research 8: 175-185.
  • Fitch WM. 1971. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimal change for a specific tree topology. Systematic Zoology 20: 406-416.
  • Goloboff P, Farris S, Nixon K. 2000. TNT (tree analysis using new technology). ver. 1.1. Tucuman, Argentina: Published by the authors.
  • Green P. 1999. Phrap, ver. 0.990329, distributed by the author. Available at: http://www.phrap.org
  • Green P, Ewing B. 2002. Phred, ver. 0.020425.c, distributed by the authors. Available at: http://www.phrap.org
  • Hedin MC. 1997. Molecular phylogenetics at the population/ species interface in cave spiders of the southern Appalachians (Araneae: Nesticidae: Nesticus). Molecular Biology and Evolution 14: 309-324.
  • Hedin MC, Maddison WP. 2001. A combined molecular approach to phylogeny of the jumping spider subfamily Dendryphantinae (Araneae, Salticidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 18: 386-403.
  • Maddison WP. 2006. New lapsiine jumping spiders from Ecuador (Araneae: Salticidae). Zootaxa 1255: 17-28.
  • Maddison WP, Bodner MR, Needham KM. 2008. Salticid spider phylogeny revisited, with the discovery of a large Australasian clade (Araneae: Salticidae). Zootaxa 1893: 49-64.
  • Maddison WP, Hedin MC. 2003. Jumping spider phylogeny (Araneae: Salticidae). Invertebrate Systematics 17: 529-549.
  • Maddison WP, Maddison DR. 2006. Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. ver. 1.12. Available at: http://mesquiteproject.org
  • Maddison DR, Maddison WP. 2008. Chromaseq: a Mesquite package for analyzing sequence chromatograms. Version 0.95. Available at: http://mesquiteproject.org/packages/chromaseq
  • Maddison WP, Needham KM. 2006. Lapsiines and hisponines as phylogenetically basal salticid spiders (Araneae: Salticidae). Zootaxa 1255: 37-55.
  • Maddison WP, Zhang JX. 2006. New lyssomanine and hisponine jumping spiders from Africa (Araneae: Salticidae). Zootaxa 1255: 29-35.
  • Maddison WP, Zhang JX, Bodner MR. 2007. A basal phylogenetic placement for the salticid spider Eupoa, with description of two new species (Araneae: Salticidae). Zootaxa 1432: 23-33.
  • Makhan D. 2007. Soesiladeepakius aschnae gen. et sp. nov. and Soesilarishius amrishi gen. et sp. nov. from Suriname (Araneae: Salticidae). Calodema Supplementary Paper 60: 1-8.
  • Mallatt J, Sullivan J. 1998. 28S and 18S rDNA sequences support the monophyly of lampreys and hagfishes. Molecular Biology and Evolution 15: 1706-1718.
  • Nixon KC. 2002. Winclada. ver. 1.00.08, Ithaca, NY: published by the author.
  • Petrunkevitch A. 1925. Arachnida from Panama. Transactions of the Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences 27: 51-248.
  • Posada D, Buckley TR. 2004. Model selection and model averaging in phylogenetics: advantages of the AIC and Bayesian approaches over likelihood ratio tests. Systematic Biology 53: 793-808.
  • Posada D, Crandall KA. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817-818.
  • Stamatakis A, Ludwig T, Meier H. 2005. RAxML-III: a fast program for maximum likelihood-based inference of large phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 21: 456-463.
  • Su KF, Meier R, Jackson RR, Harland DP, Li D. 2007. Convergent evolution of eye ultrastructure and divergent evolution of vision-mediated predatory behaviour in jumping spiders. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 20: 1478- 1489.
  • Swofford DL, Maddison WP. 1987. Reconstructing ancestral character states under Wagner parsimony. Mathematical Biosciences 87: 199-229.
  • Vink CJ, Hedin M, Bodner MR, Maddison WP, Hayashi CY, Garb JE. 2008. Actin 5C, a promising nuclear gene for spider phylogenetics. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 48: 377-382.
  • Wheeler T, Kececioglu J. 2007. Multiple alignment by aligning alignments. Proceedings of the 15th ISCB conference on intelligent systems for molecular biology. Bioinformatics 23: i559-i568.
  • Zwickl DJ. 2006. Genetic algorithm approaches for the phylogenetic analysis of large biological sequence datasets under the maximum likelihood criterion. Unpublished D. Phil. Thesis, The University of Texas at Austin.