Biodiversity Literature Repository
Published September 30, 2015 | Version v1
Journal article Open

A gall mite, Aceria rhodiolae (Acari: Eriophyidae), altering the phytochemistry of a medicinal plant, Rhodiola rosea (Crassulaceae), in the Canadian Arctic

Creators

  • 1. Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes, Science & Technology Branch, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, Canada, K1A 0C6;
  • 2. Jardin botanique de Montréal, Institut de recherche en biologie végétale, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada, H1X 2B2;
  • 3. Centre for Advanced Research in Environmental Genomics, Department of Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada, K1N 6N5

Description

Beaulieu, F., Cuerrier, A., Filion, V.J., Saleem, A., Arnason, J.T. (2015): A gall mite, Aceria rhodiolae (Acari: Eriophyidae), altering the phytochemistry of a medicinal plant, Rhodiola rosea (Crassulaceae), in the Canadian Arctic. Journal of Natural History 50: 1237-1263, DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2015.1103910, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2015.1103910

Files

source.pdf

Files (3.8 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:b25bfed4771f161dbd161c9c2421728b
3.8 MB Preview Download

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:B25BFFD4771F161DBD16FF9C2421FF8B
URL
http://publication.plazi.org/id/B25BFFD4771F161DBD16FF9C2421FF8B

Cites
Publication: 10.1007/s10493-015-9945-9 (DOI)
Has part
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.4323734 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/4E6287AC7718160CBCD6FA9626BDFBE7 (URL)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.3990263 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.3990265 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.3990267 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.3990269 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.3990271 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.3990273 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.3990275 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.3990277 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.3990279 (DOI)
Is source of
Dataset: http://www.gbif.org/dataset/b92f4f7a-6ea8-4ef5-aa0e-8333a88cae1c (URL)

References

  • Aiken SG, Dallwitz MJ, Consaul LL, McJannet CL, Boles RL, Argus GW, Gillett JM, Scott PJ, Elven R, LeBlanc MC, et al. 2007. Flora of the Canadian Arctic Archipelago: descriptions, illustrations, identification, and information retrieval [Internet]. Ottawa: NRC Research Press, National Research Council of Canada; [cited 2013 Nov]. Available from: http://nature.ca/aaflora/data
  • Alta H, Docters van Leeuwen WM. 1946. Gallenboek: Nederlandse Zoocecidien door dieren veroorzaakte gallen [Gall book: Dutch zoocecidia caused by animals]. Amsterdam: GW Breughel.
  • Amrine Jr JW, Manson DCM. 1996. Techniques. 1.6.3. Preparation, mounting and descriptive study of eriophyoid mites. In: Lindquist EE, Sabelis MW, Bruin J, editors. Eriophyoid mites: their biology, natural enemies and control world crop pests series. Vol. 6. Amsterdam: Elsevier; p. 383-398.
  • Amrine Jr JW, Stasny TA. 1994. Catalog of the Eriophyoidea (Acarina: Prostigmata) of the world. West Bloomfield (MI): Indira Publishing House.
  • Avula B, Wang Y-H, Ali Z, Smillie TJ, Filion V, Cuerrier A, Arnason JT, Khan IA. 2009. RP-HPLC determination of phenylalkanoids and monoterpenoids in Rhodiola rosea and identification by LC-ESI-TOF. Biomed Chromatogr. 23:865-872.
  • Baker EW, Kono T, Amrine Jr. JW, Delfinado-Baker M, Stasny TA. 1996. Eriophyoid mites of the United States. West Bloomfield (MI): Indira Publishing House; 394 pp.
  • Baudys E. 1938. Vierter Beitrage zur Verbreitung der Zoocecidien in der Slowakei [in Czech]. Sbornik Klubu Prirodovedeckeho v Brne. 21:33-37.
  • Beaulieu F, Knee W. 2014. Plant-feeding mites of the Canadian Prairies. In: Carcamo H, Giberson D, editors. Arthropods of Canadian Grasslands (Vol. 3): biodiversity of and systematics Part 1. Ottawa (Canada): Biological Survey of Canada; p. 29-72.
  • Bernini F, Castagnoli M, Nannelli R. 1995. Arachnida Acari. In: Minelli A, Ruffo S, La Posta S, editors. Checklist delle specie della fauna italiana. Vol. 24. Bologna: Calderini; p. 1-131.
  • Blackman RL, Eastop VF. 2006. Aphids on the world 's herbaceous plants and shrubs. Vols 1-2. Chichester (England): John Wiley & Sons; 1439 pp.
  • Bland KP. 1995. Phytomyza rhodiolae Griffiths, 1976 (Diptera: Agromyzidae), a leaf-miner in roseroot, Sedum rosea (Crassulaceae), new to Britain. Entomol Gaz. 46:267-269.
  • Boczek J. 1961. Badania nad roztoczami z rodziny Eriophyidae (Szpecielowate) w Polsce. I (Studies on eriophyid mites of Poland. I) (in Polish). Prace Naukowe Instytutu Ochrony Roslin. 3:5-82.
  • Brown RP, Gerbarg PL, Ramazanov Z. 2002. Rhodiola rosea: a phytochemical overview. HerbalGram. 56:40-52.
  • Buhr H. 1965. Bestimmungstabellen der Gallen (Zoo- und Phytocecidien) an Pflanzen Mittel- und Nordeuropas [Identification key of galls (zoo- and phyto-cecidia) on plants of central and northern Europe]. Vol. II. Jena (Germany): G. Fischer.
  • Canestrini G. 1892. Prospetto dell 'Acarofauna Italiana. Parte V. Famiglia dei Phytoptini (Phytoptidae). Atti della Societa Veneto-Trentina di Scienze naturali, Padova Ser. II(1): 541-722 + pls. 44-59.
  • Canestrini G. 1894. Prospetto dell 'Acarofauna Italiana. Parte VI. Appendice ai Fitoptidi italiani. Atti della Societa Veneto- Trentina di Scienze naturali, Padova Ser. II:773-833 + pls. 60-61.
  • Cayer F, Ahmed F, Filion V, Saleem A, Cuerrier A, Allard M, Rochefort G, Merali Z, Arnason JT. 2013. Characterization of the anxiolytic activity of Nunavik Rhodiola rosea. Planta Med. 79:1385-1391.
  • Chetverikov PE. 2012. Confocal laser scanning microscopy technique for the study of internal genitalia and external morphology of eriophyoid mites (Acari: Eriophyoidea). Zootaxa. 3453:56-68.
  • Chetverikov PE. 2014. Distal oviduct and genital chamber of eriophyoids (Acariformes, Eriophyoidea): refined terminology and remarks on CLSM technique for studying musculature of mites. Exp Appl Acarol. 64:407-428.
  • Chetverikov PE. 2015. Confocal microscopy reveals uniform male reproductive anatomy in eriophyoid mites (acariformes, eriophyoidea) including spermatophore pump and paired vasa deferentia. Exp Appl Acarol. 66:555-574.
  • Chetverikov PE, Beaulieu F, Cvrkovic T, Vidovic B, Petanovic RU. 2012. Oziella sibirica (Acari: Eriophyoidea: Phytoptidae), a new eriophyoid mite species described using confocal microscopy, COI barcoding and 3D surface reconstruction. Zootaxa. 3560:41-60.
  • Chetverikov PE, Craemer C, Vishnyakov AE, Sukhareva SI. 2014. CLSM anatomy of internal genitalia of Mackiella reclinata n. sp. and systematic remarks on eriophyoid mites from the tribe Mackiellini Keifer, 1946 (Eriophyoidea: Phytoptidae). Zootaxa. 3860:261-279.
  • Chetverikov PE, Cvrkovic T, Makunin A, Sukhareva SI, Vidovic B, Petanovic R. 2015. Basal divergence of eriophyoidea (acariformes, eupodina) inferred from combined partial coi and 28s gene sequences and clsm genital anatomy. Exp Appl Acarol. doi:10.1007/s10493-015-9945-9
  • Chetverikov PE, Cvrkovic T, Vidovic B, Petanovic RU 2013. Description of a new relict eriophyoid mite, Loboquintus subsquamatus n. gen. & n. sp. (Eriophyoidea, Phytoptidae, Pentasetacini) based on confocal microscopy, SEM, COI barcoding and novel CLSM anatomy of internal genitalia. Exp Appl Acarol. 60:1-30.
  • Clausen RT. 1975. Sedum of North America, North of the Mexican Plateau. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; p. 742.
  • Cuerrier A, Archambault M, Bruneau A. 2014a. Taxonomy of Rhodiola rosea L. with special attention to molecular analyses of Nunavik (Quebec) populations. In: Cuerrier A, Ampong-Nyarko K, editors. Rhodiola rosea. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
  • Cuerrier A, Hermanutz L. 2012. Our plants. . . Our land: plants of Nain and Torngat Mountains Basecamp & Research Station (Nunatsiavut). Montreal: IRBV & MUN; 126 pp.
  • Cuerrier A, Tendland Y, Rapinski M. 2014b. Ethnobotany and conservation of Rhodiola spp. In: Cuerrier A, Ampong-Nyarko K, editors. Rhodiola rosea. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
  • Davis R, Flechtmann CHW, Boczek JH, Barke HE. 1982. Catalogue of eriophyid mites (Acari: Eriophyoidea). Warsaw: Warsaw Agricultural University Press.
  • de Lillo E, Craemer C, Amrine Jr JW, Nuzzaci G. 2010. Recommended procedures and techniques for morphological studies of Eriophyoidea (Acari: Prostigmata). Exp Appl Acarol. 51:283-307.
  • de Lillo E, Monfreda R. 2004. 'Salivary secretions ' of eriophyoids (Acari: Eriophyoidea): first results of an experimental model. Exp Appl Acarol. 34:291-306.
  • de Lillo E, Skoracka A. 2010. What 's "cool" on eriophyoid mites? Exp Appl Acarol. 51:3-30.
  • Farkas H. 1965. Familie Eriophyidae, Gallmilben [Family Eriophyidae, gall mites]. Die Tierwelt Mitteleuropas (The Fauna of Central Europe). Band 3, Lief. 3 Neubearb.
  • Felt EP. 1940. Plant galls and gall makers. New York: Hafner Publishing Company.
  • Fida A, Bennett SAL, Arnason JT. 2014. Pharmacological activities of Rhodiola rosea. In: Cuerrier A, Ampong-Nyarko K, editors. Rhodiola rosea. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
  • Filion V, Saleem A, Rochefort G, Allard M, Cuerrier A, Arnason JT. 2008. Phytochemical analysis of Nunavik Rhodiola rosea L. Nat Prod Commun. 3:721-726.
  • Gamliel-Atinsky E, Freeman S, Maymon M, Belausov E, Ochoa R, Bauchan G, Skoracka A, Pena J, Palevsky E. 2010. The role of eriophyoids in fungal pathogen epidemiology, mere association or true interaction? Exp Appl Acarol. 51:191-204.
  • Griffiths GCD. 1976. Studies on boreal Agromyzidae (Diptera). X. Phytomyza miners on Crassulaceae. Quaest Entomol. 12:203-210.
  • Holman J. 2009. Host plant catalog of aphids. Palearctic Region. Netherlands: Springer; 1140 pp.
  • Julin E. 1936. Contributions a la connaissance des zoocecidies de la Laponie septentrionale [Contributions to the knowledge of animal galls of northern Lapland]. Bot Notiser. 6:539-562.
  • Kari LE. 1932. Kokousselostuksia (In Finnish) [one sentence, within a meeting report]. Luonnon Ystava. 36:212.
  • Kari LE. 1936. Eriophyidocecidien aus Finnland [Eriophyid galls from Finland]. Annales Universitatis Turkuensis Series A. 5:5-25.
  • Keifer HH. 1939. Eriophyid studies VII. Bull Calif Dept Agric. 28:482-505.
  • Keifer HH. 1944. Eriophyid Studies XIV. Bull Calif Dept Agric. 33:18-38.
  • Keifer HH, Baker EW, Kono T, Delfinado M, Styer WE. 1982. An illustrated guide to plant abnormalities caused by eriophyid mites in North America. In: Agriculture handbook. Vol. 573. United States Department of Agriculture; 178 pp.
  • Krantz GN, Ehrensing DT. 1990. Deuterogyny in the skeleton weed mite, Aceria chondrillae (G. Can.) (Acari: Eriophyidae). Int J Acarol. 16:129-133.
  • Kurkin VA. 2003. Phenylpropanoids from medicinal plants: distribution, classification, structural analysis, and biological activity. Chem Nat Compd. 39:123-153.
  • Kuznetsova NP, Krivets SA. 1981. The weevil Hylobius gebleri Boh. - pest of golden root in the Siberian Botanical Garden [in Russian]. In: Cherepanov AI, editor. Fauna and ecology of arthropods of Siberia (Proceedings of the 5th Conference of Siberian Entomologists). Novosibirsk (Russia): Biological Institute, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; p. 159-162.
  • Larson KC. 1998. The impact of two gall-forming arthropods on the photosynthetic rates of their hosts. Oecologia (Berlin). 115:161-166.
  • Layberry RA, Hall P, Lafontaine D. 1998. The butterflies of Canada. Toronto (Canada): University of Toronto Press; 280 pp.
  • Leatherdale D. 1959. The plant galls of Norway: a preliminary catalogue based on the collection of the Zoological Museum, University of Bergen. Univeritetet i Bergen, Arbok. Naturvitenskapelig rekke, Nr 8.
  • Lindquist EE. 1996. External anatomy and systematics. 1.1.1. External anatomy and notation of structures. In: Lindquist EE, Sabelis MW, Bruin J, editors. Eriophyioid mites: their biology, natural enemies and control. World crop pests series. Vol. 6. Amsterdam: Elsevier; p. 3-31.
  • Lindquist EE, Ainscough BD, Clulow FV, Funk RC, Marshall VG, Nesbitt HHJ, Oconnor BM, Smith IM, Wilkinson PR. 1979. Acari. In: Danks HV, editor. Canada and its insect fauna. Vol. 108. Mem Entomol Soc Can. Ottawa (Canada): The Entomological Society of Canada; p. 252-290.
  • Lindquist EE, Amrine Jr JW. 1996. External anatomy and systematics. 1.1.2. Systematics, diagnoses for major taxa, and keys to families and genera with species on plants of economic importance. In: Lindquist EE, Sabelis MW, Bruin J, editors. Eriophyioid mites: their biology, natural enemies and control. World crop pests series. Vol. 6. Amsterdam: Elsevier; p. 33-87.
  • Liro JI. 1941. Uber neue und seltene Eriophyiden (Acarina) [About new and rare Eriophyidae (Acarina)]. Annales Botanici Societatis Vanamo. 8:1-53.
  • Liro JI, Roivainen H. 1951. Akamapunkit Eriophyidae [Gall mites Eriophyidae]. Porvoo- Helsinki (Finland): Werner Soderstrom Osakeyhtio.
  • Low F. 1881. Mittheilungen uber Phytoptocecidien [Communications on plant galls]. Verhandlungen der Kaiserlich-Koniglichen Zoologisch-Botanischen Gesellschaft in Wien. 31:1-8.
  • Low F. 1885. Ueber neue und schon bekannte Phytoptocecidien [On new and already known plant galls]. Verhandlungen der Kaiserlich- Koniglichen Zoologisch- Botanischen Gesellschaft in Wien. 35:451-470.
  • McClay AS, Littlefield JL, Kashefi J. 1999. Establishment of Aceria malherbae (Acari: Eriophyidae) as a biological control agent for field bindweed (Convolvulaceae) in the northern Great Plains. Can Entomol. 131:541-547.
  • Moesz G. 1938. Magyarorszag gubacsai [Galls of Hungary] (in Hungarian). Bonatikai Kozlemenyek. XXXV:97-205.
  • Nalepa A. 1891. Genera und Species der Familie Phytoptidae [Genera and species of the family Phytoptidae]. Anz Akad Wissenschaften. 58:867-884.
  • Nalepa A. 1893. Katalog der bisher beschriebenen Gallmilben, ihrer Gallen und Nahrpflanzen, nebst Angabe der einschlagigen Literatur und kritischen Zusatzen [Catalogue of gall mites described so far, their galls and host plants, with references to relevant literature and critical notes]. Zool Jahrb. 7:274-328.
  • Nalepa A. 1895. Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Gattungen Phytoptus Duj. und Monaulax Nal. Denkschriften der Kaiserlichen Akademie Wissenschaften, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Classe. 62:627- 640 + 4 pls.
  • Nalepa A. 1898. Eriophyidae (Phytoptidae). Das Tierreich. Eine Zusammenstellung und Kennzeichnung der rezenten Tierformen. Berlin: R. Friedlander und Sohn.
  • Nalepa A. 1911. Eriophyiden, Gallenmilben. In: Rubsaamen EH, Hedicke H, editors. Die Zoocecidien, durch Tiere erzeugte Pflanzengallen Deutschlands und ihre Bewohner. Vol. 1. Stuttgart: Schweizerbart; p. 166-293 + 6 pls.
  • Nalepa A. 1923. Index nominum quae ab a. 1886 Eriophyidarum generibus, speciebus et subspeciebus imposita sunt, conscriptus ab. Marcellia. 20:25-66.
  • Nalepa A. 1929. Neuer Katalog der bisher beschriebenen Gallmilben, ihrer Gallen und Wirtspflanzen (New catalog of gall mites described so far, their galls and host plants). Marcellia. 25:67-183.
  • Navia D, Mendonca RSD, Skoracka A, Szydlo W, Knihinicki D, Hein GL, da Silva Pereira PRV, Truol G, Lau D. 2013. Wheat curl mite, Aceria tosichella, and transmitted viruses: an expanding pest complex affecting cereal crops. Exp Appl Acarol. 59:95-143.
  • Nongame and Natural Heritage Program. 1999. Vermont 's rare and uncommon native plants (15 November 2012). Vermont: Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife Nongame and Natural Heritage Program; [Accessed Feb 2014]. Available from: http://www.vtfishandwildlife.com/ library/Reports_and_Documents/NonGame_and_Natural_Heritage/ Rare_Threatened_and_Endangered_Species%20%20-%20lists/Endangered%20and% 20Threatened%20Plants%20of%20Vermont.pdf
  • Panossian A, Wikman G. 2014. Evidence based efficacy and effectiveness of Rhodiola SHR-5 extract in treating stress- and age-associated disorders. In: Cuerrier A, Ampong-Nyarko K, editors. Rhodiola rosea. Boca Raton: CRC.
  • Patankar R, Quinton WL, Baltzer JL. 2013. Permafrost-driven differences in habitat quality determine plant response to gall-inducing mite herbivory. J Ecol. 101:1042-1052.
  • Petanovic R, Boczek J, Stojnic B. 1997. Taxonomy and bioecology of eriophyids (Acari: Eriophyoidea) associated with Canada thistle, Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. Acarologia. 38:181-191.
  • Petanovic R, Kielkiewicz M. 2010a. Plant-eriophyoid mite interactions: cellular biochemistry and metabolic responses induced in mite-injured plants. Part I. Exp Appl Acarol. 51:61-80.
  • Petanovic R, Kielkiewicz M. 2010b. Plant-eriophyoid mite interactions: specific and unspecific morphological alterations. Part II. Exp Appl Acarol. 51:81-91.
  • Petanovic R, Stankovic S. 1999. Catalog of the Eriophyoidea (Acari: Prostigmata) of Serbia and Montenegro. Acta Entomol Serbica. Special issue: 1-143.
  • Plant Industry Division. 1998. List of North Carolina 's endangered, threatened, and special concern plant species (December 2010). North Carolina: North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services; [Accessed Feb 2014]. http://www.ncagr.gov/plantindustry/plant/plantconserve/plist.htm
  • Roivainen H. 1950. Eriophyid news from Sweden. Acta Entomol Fenn. 7:1-51.
  • Ross H, Hedicke H. 1927. Die Pflanzengallen (Cecidien) Mittel- und Nordeuropas: ihre Erreger und Biologie und Bestimmungstabellen (The plant galls (cecidia) of Central and Northern Europe: their pathogens, biology and identification keys). Jena (Germany): G Fisher.
  • Royalty RN, Perring TM. 1989. Reduction in photosynthesis of tomato leaflets caused by tomato russet mite (Acari: Eriophyidae). Environ Entomol. 18:256-260.
  • Royalty RN, Perring TM. 1996. 3.1. Nature of damage and its assessment. In: Lindquist EE, Sabelis MW, Bruin J, editors. Eriophyioid mites: their biology, natural enemies and control world crop pests series. Vol. 6. Amsterdam: Elsevier; p. 493-512.
  • Samsone I, Andersone U, Ievinsh G. 2012. Variable effect of arthropod-induced galls on photochemistry of photosynthesis, oxidative enzyme activity and ethylene production in tree leaf tissues. Environ Exp Biol. 10:15-26.
  • Schmid U. 2007. How to find Cheilosia rhodiolae Schmid, 2000 (Diptera, Syrphidae). Volucella. 8:121-122.
  • Skoracka A, Lewandowski M, Boczek J. 2005. A catalogue of eriophyoid mites (Acari: Eriophyoidea) of Poland. Warszawa: Natura optima dux Foundation. Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences.
  • Small E, Catling PM. 2000. Les cultures medicinales canadiennes. Ottawa: Presses scientifiques du CNRC.
  • Smetanin A. 2013. A new bark beetle species, Dryocoetes krivolutzkajae Mandelshtam, 2001 (Scolytidae), discovered in Kamchatka. Contemp Probl Ecol. 6:43-44.
  • Stevens PF. 2001 onwards. Angiosperm phylogeny website. Version 12, July 2012 [and more or less continuously updated since]; [Accessed Feb 2014]. Available from: http://www.mobot.org/ MOBOT/research/APweb/
  • Szepligeti G. 1890. Adatok a gubacsok elterjedesenek ismeretehez kulonos tekintettel Budapest kornyekere (Contribution to the knowledge of the distribution of the galls with special consideration for the region of Budapest) (in Hungarian). Termeszetrajzi Fuzetek. 13:12-44.
  • Tolonen A, Zsuzsanna G, Jalonen J, Neubauer P, Hohtola A. 2004. LC/MS/MS identification of glycosides produced by biotransformation of cinnamyl alcohol in Rhodiola rosea compact callus aggregates. Biomed Chromatogr. 18:550-558.
  • Valle A. 1955. Revisione dell 'Acaroteca Canestrini. Memorie della Classe di Scienze Matematiche e Naturali, Padova, Presso la Sede dell 'Accademia, Via Accademia n. 13-15, Societa Cooperativa Tipografica; p. 67-101.
  • Wahlgren E. 1948. Eriophyidcecidier av biogeografiskt intresse (Eriophyid galls of biogeographical interest). Entomologisk Tidskrift Stockholm. 69:161-206.