Published December 29, 2023 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Can the vegetation structure and composition in urban green spaces determine diversity of green lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae)?

  • 1. Center for Lepidoptera and Biodiversity, Florida Museum of Natural History, Gainesville,
  • 2. Agronomy Department, University of Florida, Homestead, FL, USA
  • 3. Biológicas, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Coyoacán
  • 4. de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias, Campo Experimental General Teran
  • 5. Tecnológico Nacional de México Campus Conkal, YUC, Mexico

Description

Martinez, Jose I., Castillo, Raiza J., Ardila-Camacho, Adrian, Covell, Charles V., López-Arroyo, Jose Isabel, Nava-Guízar, Francisco Javier (2023): Can the vegetation structure and composition in urban green spaces determine diversity of green lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae)? Insecta Mundi 2023 (23): 1-22, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.10621707

Files

source.pdf

Files (6.1 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:0681f320176d627156d01cdff443fc82
6.1 MB Preview Download

Linked records

Additional details

References

  • Abraham L, Marko V, Vas J. 2003. Investigations on a neuropteroid community by using different methods. Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica 38: 199-207.
  • Agnew CW. 1983. Mounting and preserving Neuroptera for scientific study. Entomological News 94: 205-212.
  • Aguilera G, Ekroos J, Persson AS, Pettersson LB, Ockinger E. 2019. Intensive management reduces butterfly diversity over time in urban green spaces. Urban Ecosystems 22: 335- 344.
  • Aronson MF, La Sorte FA, Nilon CH, Katti M, Goddard MA, Lepczyk CA, Warren P, Williams N, Cilliers S, Clarkson B, Dobbs C, Dolan R, Hedblom M, Klotz S, Kooijmans JL, Kuhn I, MacGregor-Fors I, McDonnell M, Mortberg U, Pysek P, Siebert S, Sushinsky J, Werner P, Winter M. 2014. A global analysis of the impacts of urbanization on bird and plant diversity reveals key anthropogenic drivers. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 281: 1-8.
  • Ayala-Arcipreste ME. 2001. La apicultura de la Peninsula de Yucatan un acercamiento desde la ecologia humana. M.Sc. Thesis, Instituto Politecnico Nacional, Centro de Investigacion y estudios avanzados Press. Available athttp://bibliotecasibe. ecosur.mx/sibe/book/000028703 (Last accessed March 20, 2019.)
  • Ayuntamiento de Merida. 2018. Sistema de gestion de espacios publicos. Available at http://isla.Merida.gob.mx/servicios internet/ordenamientoterritorial/docs/SistemaGestion.pdf. (Last accessed November 19, 2023.)
  • Banaszak-Cibicka W, Ratynska H, Dylewski L. 2016. Features of urban green space favourable for large and diverse bee populations (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Apiformes). Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 20: 448-452.
  • Banks N. 1945. A review of the Chrysopidae (Nothochrysinae) of Central America. Psyche 52: 139-174.
  • Banks N. 1948. Chrysopidae (Nothochrysidae) collected in Mexico by Dr. A. Dampf (Neuroptera). Psyche 55: 151-177.
  • Barrientos R, Leirana J, Navarro J. 2016. Metodos graficos para la exploracion de patrones de diversidad en Ecologia. Bioagrociencias 9: 11-18.
  • Blair RB. 2001. Birds and butterflies along urban gradients in two ecoregions of the United States: Is urbanization creating a homogeneous fauna? p. 33-56. In: Lockwood JL, McKinney ML (eds.). Biotic homogenization. Springer; NY. 299 p.
  • Brooks SJ, Barnard PC. 1990. The green lacewings of the world: a generic review (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) Entomology 59: 117-286.
  • Brown KS, Freitas AVL. 2002. Butterfly communities of urban forest fragments in Campinas, Sao Paulo, Brazil: structure, instability, environmental correlates, and conservation. Journal of Insect Conservation 6: 217-231.
  • Brown KS, Hutchings RW. 1997. Disturbance, fragmentation, and the dynamics of diversity in Amazonian forest butterflies. p. 91-110. In: Laurance WF, Bierregaard RO Jr. (eds.). Tropical forest remnants: ecology, management, and conservation of fragmented communities. University of Chicago Press; Chicago, IL. 616 p.
  • Cancino-Lopez RJ, Contreras-Ramos A. 2019. A new species of Ceraeochrysa Adams (Neuroptera, Chrysopidae), with a key to the species from Mexico. ZooKeys 888: 95-104.
  • Carnevali G, Tapia-Munoz JL, de Stefano RD, Morillo IR. 2010. Flora ilustrada de la peninsula de Yucatan: listado floristico. Centro de Investigacion Cientifica de Yucatan; Merida, Mexico. 326 p.
  • Chavez-Zichinelli CA, MacGregor-Fors I, Rohana PT, Valdez R, Romano MC, Schondube JE. 2010. Stress responses of the house sparrow (Passer domesticus) to different urban land uses. Landscape and Urban Planning 98: 183-189.
  • Chao A, Gotelli NJ, Hsieh TC, Sander EL, Ma KH, Colwell RK, Ellison A.M. 2014. Rarefaction and extrapolation with Hill numbers: a framework for sampling and estimation in species diversity studies. Ecological Monographs 84: 45-67.
  • Chao A, Jost L. 2012. Coverage-based rarefaction and extrapolation: standardizing samples by completeness rather than size. Ecology 93: 2533-2547.
  • Clark TL, Messina FJ. 1998. Foraging behavior of lacewing larvae (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) on plants with divergent architectures. Journal of Insect Behavior 11: 303-317.
  • CONAGUA (Comision Nacional del Agua). 2015. Datos meteorologicos del Organismo de Cuenca: peninsula de Yucatan. Merida: Direccion tecnica jefatura de proyecto de aguas superficiales y meteorologia. Available at https://smn.conagua. gob.mx/es/climatologia/temperaturas-y-lluvias/resumenes-mensuales-de-temperaturas-y-lluvias (Last accessed March 10, 2019.)
  • Contreras MGL, Argumedo JJ. 2012. Identificacion de enemigos naturales de Diaphorina citri Kuwayama (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) en el estado de Yucatan, Mexico. Fitosanidad 16(1): 5-11.
  • Contreras-Ramos A, Rosas MV. 2014. Biodiversidad de Neuroptera en Mexico. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 85: S264-S270.
  • Cortez-Mondaca E, Lugo-Angulo NE, Perez-Marquez J, Apodaca-Sanchez MA. 2001. Primer reporte de enemigos naturales y parasitismo sobre Diaphorina citri Kuwayama en Sinaloa, Mexico. Revista Cientifica UDO Agricola, 11: 97-103.
  • De Freitas S, Penny ND. 2001. The green lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) of Brazilian agro-ecosystems. Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences 52: 245-395.
  • De Freitas S, Penny ND, Adams PA. 2009. A revision of the New World genus Ceraeochrysa (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences 60: 503- 610.
  • Deloya C, Ordonez-Resendiz MM. 2008. Escarabajos (Insecta: Coleoptera). p. 123-134. In: Manson RH, Hernandez-Ortiz V, Gallina S, Mehltreter K (eds.). Agroecosistemas cafeteros de Veracruz: Biodiversidad, manejo y conservacion. Instituto de Ecologia A.C. (INECOL); Veracruz, Mexico. 330 p.
  • Devetak D, Klokocovnik V. 2016. The feeding biology of adult lacewings (Neuroptera): a review. Trends in Entomology 12: 29-42.
  • Garzon A, Medina P, Amor F, Vinuela E, Budia F. 2015. Toxicity and sublethal effects of six insecticides to last instar larvae and adults of the biocontrol agents Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) and Adalia bipunctata (L.) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Chemosphere 132: 87-93.
  • Garzon-Orduna IJ, Winterton SL, Jiang Y, Breitkreuz LC, Duelli P, Engel MS, Liu X. 2019. Evolution of green lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae): a molecular supermatrix approach. Systematic Entomology 44: 499-513.
  • Hammer O, Harper DA, Ryan PD. 2001. Palaeontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica. 4: 1-9.
  • Herbario-CICY. 2010. Flora de la Peninsula de Yucatan. Available at http://www.cicy.mx/sitios/flora%20digital/ (Last accessed March 20, 2019.)
  • Hsieh TC, Ma KH, Chao A. 2016. iNEXT: an R package for rarefaction and extrapolation of species diversity (H ill numbers). Methods in Ecology and Evolution 7: 1451-1456.
  • Jimenez-Osornio JJ, Ruenes-Morales MR, Montanez-Escalante P. 1999. Agrodiversidad de los solares de la Peninsula de Yucatan. Red, Gestion de Recursos Naturales 14: 30-40.
  • Koh LP, Sodhi NS. 2004. Importance of reserves, fragments, and parks for butterfly conservation in a tropical urban landscape. Ecological Applications 14: 1695-1708.
  • Koczor S, Szentkiralyi F, Toth M. 2019. New perspectives for simultaneous attraction of Chrysoperla and Chrysopa lacewing species for enhanced biological control (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Scientific reports. 9: 1-6.
  • Lassau SA, Hochuli DF. 2004. Effects of habitat complexity on ant assemblages. Ecography 27: 157-164.
  • Lopez-Arroyo JI. 2001. Depredadores de afidos asociados a los citricos en Nuevo Leon, Mexico. Abstrac E-153. In: Sociedad Mexicana de Entomologia. Memorias XXXVI Congreso Nacional de Entomologia y XXVIII Congreso Nacional de Fitopatologia; Queretaro, Mexico.
  • Lopez-Arroyo JI, Cortez-Mondaca E, Arredondo-Bernal HC, Ramirez-Delgado M, Loera-Gallardo J, Mellin-Rosas MA. 2007. Uso de artropodos depredadores para el control biologico de plagas en Mexico. p. 90-105. In: Rodriguez-Del Bosque LA, Arredondo-Bernal HC. (eds.). Teoria y aplicacion del control biologico. Sociedad Mexicana de Control Biologico; Mexico City, Mexico 303 p.
  • Lopez-Arroyo JI, De Leon T. 2002. Produccion de Ceraeochrysa (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) In: Arredondo-Bernal HC, Perez-Serrato P, Mellin-Rosas MA (eds.). Control biologico del pulgon cafe de los citricos, Toxoptera citricida, vector del virus de la tristeza de los citricos. 3ra. ed. SAGARPA. Comision Nacional de Sanidad Agropecuaria; Merida, Mexico. 149 p.
  • Lozano-Contreras MG, Jasso-Argumedo J. 2013. Identificacion de enemigos naturales de Diaphorina citri Kuwayama (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) en el estado de Yucatan, Mexico. Fitosanidad. 16: 5-11.
  • Mata L, Threlfall CG, Williams NS, Hahs AK, Malipatil M, Stork NE, Livesley SJ. 2017. Conserving herbivorous and predatory insects in urban green spaces. Scientific Reports 7: 1-12.
  • McKinney ML. 2002. Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation: The impacts of urbanization on native species are poorly studied, but educating a highly urbanized human population about these impacts can greatly improve species conservation in all ecosystems. BioScience 52: 883-890.
  • Missouri Botanical Garden. 2022. Tropicos. Available at http://legacy.tropicos.org/Home.aspx (Last accessed February 16, 2022.)
  • Mochizuki A, Naka H, Hamasaki K, Mitsunaga T. 2006. Larval cannibalism and intraguild predation between the introduced green lacewing, Chrysoperla carnea, and the indigenous trash-carrying green lacewing, Mallada desjardinsi (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae), as a case study of potential nontarget effect assessment. Environmental Entomology, 35: 1298-1303.
  • Nair IJ, Sharma S, Kaur R. 2020. Efficacy of the green lace wing, Chrysoperla zastrowi sillemi (Esben-Peterson)(Neuroptera: Chrysopidae), against sucking pests of tomato: an appraisal under protected conditions. Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control 30: 1-6.
  • Niemela J. 2014. Ecology of urban green spaces: The way forward in answering major research questions. Landscape and Urban Planning 125: 298-303.
  • Oliveira IF, Lion MB, Cardoso MZ. 2018. A plaza too far: High contrast in butterfly biodiversity patterns between plazas and an urban reserve in Brazil. Landscape and Urban Planning 180: 207-216.
  • Orellana R, Carrillo L, Franco V. 2007. Arboles recomendables para las ciudades de la Peninsula de Yucatan. Unidad de Recursos Naturales, Centro de Investigacion Cientifica de Yucatan, AC; Merida, Mexico. 78 p.
  • Oswald JD. 2023. Neuropterida Species of the World. Available at https://lacewing.tamu.edu/SpeciesCatalog/Main (Last accessed November 3, 2023.)
  • Patino-Arellano SA. 2012. Complejo de afidos y riesgo de dispersion del virus de la tristeza de los citricos en la peninsula de Yucatan. M.Sc. Thesis Colegio de Posgraduados Press. https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.1.1671.8969
  • Penny ND, Tauber CA, De Leon T. 2000. A new species of Chrysopa from western North America with a key to North American species (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 93: 776-784.
  • Ramirez-Restrepo LR, Chacon De Ulloa P, Constantino LM. 2007. Diversity of diurnal butterflies (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea and Hesperioidea) in Santiago de Cali, Valle del Cauca, Colombia. Revista Colombiana de Entomologia 33: 54-63.
  • Ramirez-Restrepo LR, Halffter G. 2013. Butterfly diversity in a regional urbanization mosaic in two Mexican cities. Landscape and Urban Planning 115: 39-48.
  • Ramirez-Restrepo LR, MacGregor-Fors I. 2017. Butterflies in the city: a review of urban diurnal Lepidoptera. Urban Ecosystems 20: 171-182.
  • Raupp MJ, Shrewsbury PM, Herms DA. 2010. Ecology of herbivorous arthropods in urban landscapes. Annual Review of Entomology 55: 19-38.
  • Salazar R. 1991. Guacimo Guzuma ulmifolia Lam., Especie de Arbol de Uso Multiple en America Central. Centro Agronomico Tropical de Investigacion y Ensenanza. CATIE. Serie Tecnica. Informe Tecnico 165: 1-69.
  • Sandoval-Gio JJ, Sanchez-Castillo LE, Zarza-Meza EA, Hernandez-Jimenez JM, Fernandez-Serrano JH, Pineda-Doporto A. 2018. Toxicidad aguda diferencial de TALSTAR® (bifentrina) y BIOTHRINE® (deltametrina) en la tilapia nilotica Oreochromis niloticus. Revista Internacional de Contaminacion Ambiental 34: 45-55.
  • Sing KW, Luo J, Wang W, Jaturas N, Soga M, Yang X, Dong H, Wilson JJ. 2019. Ring roads and urban biodiversity: distribution of butterflies in urban parks in Beijing city and correlations with other indicator species. Scientific Reports 9: 7653.
  • Soto-Pinto L, Schroth G, Laderach P, Dempewolf J. 2010. Adaptacion al cambio climatico y sistemas productivos. p.193- 199. In: Fletes OHB (ed.). Pequenos productores y vulnerabilidad global agroalimentaria. Universidad Autonoma de Chiapas Red de Investigacion Socioeconomica en Hortalizas, Frutas y Flores (RISHORT); Tuxtla Gutierrez, Mexico. 385 p.
  • Stange LA. 2000. The green lacewings of Florida: (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). 1. Genera. Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry, Entomology Circular 400: 1-4.
  • Tarango-Rivero SH, Garcia-Nevarez G, Burrola-Morales JR. 2013. Manejo de afidos del nogal pecanero. INIFAP Folleto Tecnico 33: 1-42.
  • Tauber CA. 2003. Generic characteristics of Chrysopodes (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae), with new larval descriptions and a review of species from the United States and Canada. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 96: 472-490.
  • Tauber CA. 2004. A systematic review of the genus Leucochrysa (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) in the United States. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 97: 1129-1158.
  • Tauber CA, De Leon T. 2001. Systematics of green lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae): larvae of Ceraeochrysa from Mexico. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 94: 197-209.
  • Tauber CA, De Leon T, Penny ND, Tauber MJ. 2000. The genus Ceraeochrysa (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) of America north of Mexico: larvae, adults, and comparative biology. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 93: 1195-1221.
  • Tauber CA, Tauber MJ, Albuquerque GS. 2001. Plesiochrysa brasiliensis (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae): larval stages, biology, and taxonomic relationships. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 94: 858-865.
  • Thierry D, Canard M. 2007. The biodiversity of green lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) in a mosaic ecosystem in southern France. Annali del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Ferrara 8: 131-138.
  • Trouve C, Thierry D, Canard M. 2002. Preliminary survey of the lacewings (Neuroptera, Chrysopidae, Hemerobiidae) in agroecosytems in Northern France, with phenological notes. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 48: 359-369.
  • Ullah Z, Sabri MA, Ahmad S, Bilal H, Hussain D, Mughal TK, Mohsin M, Aftab A, Ahmad MI. 2017. In vitro study of comparative toxicity of different insecticides against Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 5: 697-702.
  • Uno S, Cotton J, Philpott SM. 2010. Diversity, abundance, and species composition of ants in urban green spaces. Urban Ecosystems 13: 425-441.
  • Valencia-Luna LA, Romero-Napoles J, Valdez-Carrasco J, Carrillo-Sanchez JL, Lopez-Martinez V. 2006. Taxonomia y registros de Chrysopidae (Insecta: Neuroptera) en el Estado de Morelos, Mexico. Acta Zoologica Mexicana 22: 17-61.
  • van Heezik Y, Dickinson KJM, Freeman C, Porter S, Wing J, Barratt BIP. 2016. To what extent does vegetation composition and structure influence beetle communities and species richness in private gardens in New Zealand? Landscape and Urban Planning 151: 79-88.
  • Villenave J, Deutsch B, Lode T, Rat-Morris E. 2006. Pollen preference of the Chrysoperla species (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) occurring in the crop environment in western France. European Journal of Entomology 103: 771-777.
  • Whittaker RH. 1965. Dominance and diversity in land plant communities: numerical relations of species express the importance of competition in community function and evolution. Science 147: 250-260.
  • Ye J, Li J, Li Z, Han S. 2017. Rearing of Mallada basalis (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) on modified artificial diets. PLoS ONE 12(9): 1-9.
  • Zuur A, Ieno E, Smith G. 2007. Analyzing ecological data. Springer; NY. 672 p.