Attitudes of SDCA physical therapy students towards distance learning amidst the COVID-19 pandemic
Description
The schools in the Philippines immediately shut down and started to shift to distance learning to prevent COVID-19 from quickly spreading. Distance learning had not experienced in Philippine education and most higher education institutions decided to move the school calendar due to the pandemic. This study aimed to: (a) determine the attitudes of physical therapy students in St. Dominic College of Asia towards distance learning during the COVID-19 outbreak; (b) find out the proficiency of the St. Dominic College of Asia academicians in the virtual learning environment; and (c) investigate if the school of St. Dominic College of Asia provides support to the needs of the students in virtual learning and other services. The study was conducted at St. Dominic College of Asia – Physical Therapy Department at Bacoor, Cavite. A total of 23 students participated. The Distance Learning Attitude Scale is used to measure the attitudes of students towards distance learning of physical therapy undergraduate students. The respondents show a positive attitude towards the proficiency of the academicians, course content, and the learning platform (μ = 2.28). However, some of the respondents’ moderately satisfied that they are getting a high quality of service. The attitudes of the students were highest from the third year level students, followed by the second, first, and fourth year levels. The distance learning scores of first and fourth year students are significantly higher than those of second and third year students. The therapy students of SDCA have a positive attitude towards distance learning. However, there are some categories that show the respondents are moderately satisfied with the school services such as the ICT department and student counseling services lack sufficient support for the distance education activities of the students. The distance learning attitude scale adaptation reliability has a Cronbach’s alpha 0.9.
Files
BSPT2021-02_TINGSON.pdf
Files
(325.4 kB)
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:d141d0009550cd91d6bb94db43c2325d
|
325.4 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- Cuizon, P. C. (2021). Learning delivery modalities and academic performance at this time of pandemic among selected psychology students of St. Dominic College of Asia: A comparative study. Journal of Social Transformation and Education, 2(2), 87-96.
- Dada, E. G., Alkali, A. H., & Oyewola, D. O. (2019). An investigation into the effectiveness of asynchronous and synchronous e-learning mode on students' academic performance in National Open University (NOUN), Maiduguri Centre. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science, 10(5), 54-64.
- Kurt, N., & Özkan, Y. (2014). Factors affecting the academical success in distance education. HAYEF: Journal of Education, 11(2), 219-236. https://www.hayefjournal.org/en/factors-affecting-the-academical-success-in-distance-education-16465
- Licuanan, P. B. (2017, June 5). Policies, standards and guidelines for the Bachelor of Science in Physical Therapy (BSPT) education [Memorandum]. Commission on Higher Education. https://chedro1.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/CMO-No.-55-Series-of-2017-Policies-Standards-and-Guidelines-for-the-Bachelor-of-Science-in-Physical-Therapy-BSPT-Education.pdf
- Liu, Q., Peng, W., Zhang, F., Hu, R., Li, Y., & Yan, W. (2016). The effectiveness of blended learning in health professions: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(1), e4807. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4807
- Martin, F., Polly, D., & Ritzhaupt, A. (2020, September 8). Bichronous online learning: Blending asynchronous and synchronous online learning. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/9/bichronous-online-learning-blending-asynchronous-and-synchronous-online-learning
- Pham, L., Limbu, Y. B., Bui, T. K., Nguyen, H. T., & Pham, H. T. (2019). Does e-learning service quality influence e-learning student satisfaction and loyalty? Evidence from Vietnam. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-013 6-3
- Raza, S. A., Qazi, W., Khan, K. A., & Salam, J. (2021). Social isolation and acceptance of the learning management system (LMS) in the time of COVID-19 pandemic: An expansion of the UTAUT model. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(2), 183-208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120960421
- Sáiz-Manzanares, M. C., Escolar-Llamazares, M. C., & Arnaiz González, Á. (2020). Effectiveness of blended learning in nursing education. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(5), 1589. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051589
- Şavkın, R., Bayrak, G., & Büker, N. (2021). Distance learning in the COVID-19 pandemic: Acceptance and attitudes of physical therapy and rehabilitation students in Turkey. Rural and Remote Health, 21(3), 6366. https://doi.org/10.22605/rrh6366
- Schoenfeld-Tacher, R. M., & Dorman, D. C. (2021). Effect of delivery format on student outcomes and perceptions of a veterinary medicine course: Synchronous versus asynchronous learning. Veterinary Sciences, 8(2), 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci8020013
- Simbulan, N. P. (2020, June 17). The Philippines – COVID-19 and its impact on higher education in the Philippines. The Head Foundation. https://headfoundation.org/2020/06/04/covid-19-and-its-impact-on-higher-education-in-the-philippines/
- UNICEF Philippines. (2021, August 25). Filipino children continue missing education opportunities in another year of school closure. https://www.unicef.org/philippines/press-releases/filipino-children-continue-missing-education-opportunities-another-year-school
- United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2020, March 24). COVID-19 educational disruption and response. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/covid-19-educational-disruption-and-response
- Yamagata-Lynch, L. C. (2014). Blending online asynchronous and synchronous learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(2), 189-212. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i2.1778