Project_ID,Plot_ID..format..ProjID_PlotID.,Project_Plot_Mon_ID..format..ProjID_PlotID_MonitoringMonth.,Data.source.type,Agencies,Bay,Specific_project_siteOrlocation,Bay_latitude,Bay_longitude,Region,Invasives_present..List.if.Y,UsedSiteSuitabilityModel_YN,MitVsNonMit,ActiveVsPassive,AddedSupplementalTransplantsMid.project_YN,Method_Category,Method_details,Notes.1,Reference.bed.Y.N.,Donor.bed.notes..status..size..location.,Ref..bed.initial.average.cover.size..m2...at.time.of.transplant.,Ref..bed.final.average.cover.size..m2.,Ref..bed.initial.average.shoot.density..shoots.m2...at.time.of.transplant.,Ref..bed.initial.SD.shoot.density..shoots.m2...at.time.of.transplant.,Ref..bed.average.shoot.density..shoots.m2....final,Ref..bed.SD.shoot.density..shoots.m2....Final,Ref..bed.initial...cover,Ref..bed.final...cover,Notes.on.reference.or.natural.bed,Year_of_restoration_planting,Month_of_restoration_planting,Season_of_restoration_planting,Years.monitored_time.between.restoration.and.last.monitoring.date,Frequency.of.monitoring.post.restoration,Time.of.monitoring_months.after.restoration..,If.mitigation.what.was.the.actual.mitigation.ratio_ratio.of.1.2.input.as.1.2.,Average.depth.of.area.restored..AKA.where.they.planted.FtMLLW.,Depth.Notes.Qualitative.Info,Plot.latitude..if.not.exact..write..ND..,Plot.longitude_not.exact.write.ND.,Total.number.of.shoots.transplanted..OR.flowering.shoots.deployed.for.seeding.OR.total.in.initial.area.for.passive.rest,Transplanted.initial.area.m2_for.passive.area.of.starting.eelgrass.area.present.pre.restoration,Final.area.restored.m2,Transplanted.initial.shoot.density..1msq.for.passive.restoration.pre.project.shoot.density,Final.shoot.density..1msq.,Final.shoot.density.......SD.,Transplanted.initial.vegetative.cover....,Final.vegetative.cover....,Defined.success.criteria,Did.it.meet.areal.cover..success..criteria.,Did.it.meet.shoot.density..success..criteria.,Notes.2,Wasting.disease,water.temperature,Salinity,Average.sea.level,Light.turbidity,Grain.Size,Algal.Cover,DO.,pH.,Other.environmental.data..If.Y..list.,Notes.on.Env..Data,Species.richness..quantitative..,Demostrated.habitat.provisioning.in.restored.sites...ie..we.are.counting.non.quantitative.reports.of.species.usage.,Species.observed,Species.of.economic.significance.,Notes..was.it.a.quantitative.assessment..Describe.,Blue.Carbon.,pH.amelioration.,hypoxia.amelioration.,Turbidity..water.clarity.,Other.ecosystem.services..If.Y..list..
Yaquina_Bay_1,Yaquina_Bay_1,Yaquina_Bay_2012,NA,"NOAA, Port of Newport",Yaquina Bay,NOAA MOC-P Pier,44.61,-124.0207,OR,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,None Reported,ND,Methods are not listed but likely in reports that I cannot find,Y,Two reference meadows used,460,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,See notes,See notes,Percent cover data included in the paper but did not pull for the database because we are not focusing on this metric. Reference sites (n=2) 223 m2 from -0.37 to 0.15 m MLLW and 697m2 from -0.27 to 0.15 m MLLW,2012,June,Summer,1,"12, 24, 36, 48, 96, 120, 136, 148, 172, 196 ",12,ND,1.1,0.09 to 0.53 m MLLW,ND,ND,ND,3185,ND,ND,ND,ND,See notes,See notes,Performance comparable to reference sites,Y,ND,Data on percent cover are included in the peer review publication but since we are not focusing on that metric I did not take the time to extract the data from the paper figs. I also could not track down the PHS reports which probably have that data in there. ,N,Y,Y,N,N,Y,Y,Y,N,Water motion (using clod cards),"Used YSI to measure env data, collected percent cover of green macroalgae",Y,Y,See Table 2 for list in Lewis and Henkel 2016,Dungeness crab,Y,Y,N,Y,N,NA
NRAD,NRAD_Plot1,NRAD_Plot1_1993,NA,SDSU,San Diego Bay,Naval Research and Development (NRAD) Naval Command Control Ocean Systems Facility,32.41,-117.141,S. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,"Followed Fonseca et al. 1982 methods which call for bending a pre-cut metal coathanger into ""L"" shape so it is akin to the garden staple method. ",NA,N,The paper also included a comparison of mitigation and reference beds but that was separate from the transplanting study which tested low vs high diversity plantings,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,1993,August,Summer,2,"For months 1-3, surveyed ever 2w (till Nov 1993), monthly sampling thereafter until August 1995, started subsampling in September 1994",0,ND,ND,Less than 4 m depth,ND,ND,280,6.25,6.25,6.4,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,N,ND,Low genetic diversity planting,N,Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,N,ND
NRAD,NRAD_Plot2,NRAD_Plot2_1993,NA,SDSU,San Diego Bay,Naval Research and Development (NRAD) Naval Command Control Ocean Systems Facility,32.41,-117.141,S. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,"Followed Fonseca et al. 1982 methods which call for bending a pre-cut metal coathanger into ""L"" shape so it is akin to the garden staple method. ",NA,N,The paper also included a comparison of mitigation and reference beds but that was separate from the transplanting study which tested low vs high diversity plantings,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,1993,August,Summer,2,"For months 1-3, surveyed ever 2w (till Nov 1993), monthly sampling thereafter until August 1995, started subsampling in September 1995",0,ND,ND,Less than 4 m depth,ND,ND,280,6.25,6.25,6.4,ND,ND,ND,ND,0,N,ND,High genetic diversity planting,N,Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NRAD,NRAD_Plot1,NRAD_Plot1_1995,NA,SDSU,San Diego Bay,Naval Research and Development (NRAD) Naval Command Control Ocean Systems Facility,32.41,-117.141,S. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,"Followed Fonseca et al. 1982 methods which call for bending a pre-cut metal coathanger into ""L"" shape so it is akin to the garden staple method. ",NA,N,The paper also included a comparison of mitigation and reference beds but that was separate from the transplanting study which tested low vs high diversity plantings,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,1993,August,Summer,2,"For months 1-3, surveyed ever 2w (till Nov 1993), monthly sampling thereafter until August 1995, started subsampling in September 1996",24,ND,ND,Less than 4 m depth,ND,ND,280,6.25,19.1,6.4,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,"Low genetic diversity planting, final reported area was 19.1 +/- 6 m2",N,Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NRAD,NRAD_Plot2,NRAD_Plot2_1995,NA,SDSU,San Diego Bay,Naval Research and Development (NRAD) Naval Command Control Ocean Systems Facility,32.41,-117.141,S. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,"Followed Fonseca et al. 1982 methods which call for bending a pre-cut metal coathanger into ""L"" shape so it is akin to the garden staple method. ",NA,N,The paper also included a comparison of mitigation and reference beds but that was separate from the transplanting study which tested low vs high diversity plantings,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,1993,August,Summer,2,"For months 1-3, surveyed ever 2w (till Nov 1993), monthly sampling thereafter until August 1995, started subsampling in September 1997",24,ND,ND,Less than 4 m depth,ND,ND,280,6.25,17,6.4,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,"High genetic diversity planting, final reported area was 17 +/- 10.1 m2",N,Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NEMS1,NEMS1_Plot1of1,NEMS1_Plot1of1_1991,Grey literature,"Merkel, NBC, Navy",San Diego Bay,"Coronado, Delta Beach ",32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Plug,Added dredge and transplanted with the hopes of expansion,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,1990,December,Winter,12,"12, 24, 36, 48, 96, 120, 136, 148",12,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,23400,26100,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,ND,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NEMS1,NEMS1_Plot1of1,NEMS1_Plot1of1_1992,Grey literature,"Merkel, NBC, Navy",San Diego Bay,"Coronado, Delta Beach ",32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Plug,Added dredge and transplanted with the hopes of expansion,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,1990,December,Winter,12,"12, 24, 36, 48, 96, 120, 136, 148",24,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,23400,26400,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,0,Y,ND,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NEMS1,NEMS1_Plot1of1,NEMS1_Plot1of1_1993,Grey literature,"Merkel, NBC, Navy",San Diego Bay,"Coronado, Delta Beach ",32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Plug,Added dredge and transplanted with the hopes of expansion,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,1990,December,Winter,12,"12, 24, 36, 48, 96, 120, 136, 148",36,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,23400,30900,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,ND,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NEMS1,NEMS1_Plot1of1,NEMS1_Plot1of1_1994,Grey literature,"Merkel, NBC, Navy",San Diego Bay,"Coronado, Delta Beach ",32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Plug,Added dredge and transplanted with the hopes of expansion,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,1990,December,Winter,12,"12, 24, 36, 48, 96, 120, 136, 148",48,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,23400,28000,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,ND,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NEMS1,NEMS1_Plot1of1,NEMS1_Plot1of1_1998,Grey literature,"Merkel, NBC, Navy",San Diego Bay,"Coronado, Delta Beach ",32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Plug,Added dredge and transplanted with the hopes of expansion,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,1990,December,Winter,12,"12, 24, 36, 48, 96, 120, 136, 148",96,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,23400,24800,ND,302,103.5,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,ND,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NEMS1,NEMS1_Plot1of1,NEMS1_Plot1of1_2000,Grey literature,"Merkel, NBC, Navy",San Diego Bay,"Coronado, Delta Beach ",32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Plug,Added dredge and transplanted with the hopes of expansion,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,1990,December,Winter,12,"12, 24, 36, 48, 96, 120, 136, 148",120,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,23400,28300,ND,266.4,49.6,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,ND,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NEMS1,NEMS1_Plot1of1,NEMS1_Plot1of1_2001,Grey literature,"Merkel, NBC, Navy",San Diego Bay,"Coronado, Delta Beach ",32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Plug,Added dredge and transplanted with the hopes of expansion,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,1990,December,Winter,12,"12, 24, 36, 48, 96, 120, 136, 148",136,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,23400,28300,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,ND,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NEMS1,NEMS1_Plot1of1,NEMS1_Plot1of1_2002,Grey literature,"Merkel, NBC, Navy",San Diego Bay,"Coronado, Delta Beach ",32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Plug,Added dredge and transplanted with the hopes of expansion,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,1990,December,Winter,12,"12, 24, 36, 48, 96, 120, 136, 148",148,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,23400,25100,ND,242.8,59.4,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,ND,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NEMS2,NEMS2_Plot1of1,NEMS2_Plot1of1_3mo,Grey literature,"Merkel, NBC, Navy",San Diego Bay,"Coronado, Delta Beach ",32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,Bare root transplant bundles using popsicle stick/string method ,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,No ref meadow data,1993,July,Summer,5,"3, 12, 24, 36, 60",3,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,1861.6,1578.274,15.5,134.16,ND,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,ND,Doesn't say the impacted area (only the acreage requitement) so cant determien the mitigation ratio.3mo repor),N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NEMS2,NEMS2_Plot1of1,NEMS2_Plot1of1_12mo,Grey literature,"Merkel, NBC, Navy",San Diego Bay,"Coronado, Delta Beach ",32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,Bare root transplant bundles using popsicle stick/string method ,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,No ref meadow data,1993,July,Summer,5,"3, 12, 24, 36, 60",12,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,1861.6,1740.148,15.5,170.7,100.4,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,ND,Doesn't say the impacted area (only the acreage requitement) so cant determien the mitigation ratio.3mo repor),N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NEMS2,NEMS2_Plot1of1,NEMS2_Plot1of1_24mo,Grey literature,"Merkel, NBC, Navy",San Diego Bay,"Coronado, Delta Beach ",32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,Bare root transplant bundles using popsicle stick/string method ,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,No ref meadow data,1993,July,Summer,5,"3, 12, 24, 36, 60",24,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,1861.6,1821.085,15.5,126.1,101.3,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,ND,Doesn't say the impacted area (only the acreage requitement) so cant determien the mitigation ratio.3mo repor),N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NEMS2,NEMS2_Plot1of1,NEMS2_Plot1of1_36mo,Grey literature,"Merkel, NBC, Navy",San Diego Bay,"Coronado, Delta Beach ",32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,Bare root transplant bundles using popsicle stick/string method ,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,No ref meadow data,1993,July,Summer,5,"3, 12, 24, 36, 60",36,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,1861.6,2023.43,15.5,205.3,87.9,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,ND,Doesn't say the impacted area (only the acreage requitement) so cant determien the mitigation ratio.3mo repor),N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NEMS2,NEMS2_Plot1of1,NEMS2_Plot1of1_60mo,Grey literature,"Merkel, NBC, Navy",San Diego Bay,"Coronado, Delta Beach ",32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,Bare root transplant bundles using popsicle stick/string method ,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,No ref meadow data,1993,July,Summer,5,"3, 12, 24, 36, 60",60,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,1861.6,1416.4,15.5,127.5,45.2,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,ND,Doesn't say the impacted area (only the acreage requitement) so cant determien the mitigation ratio.3mo repor),N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NEMS4,NEMS4_Plot1of1,NEMS4_Plot1of1_1994,Grey literature,"Merkel, NBC, Navy",San Diego Bay,"Coronado, Delta Beach ",32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Plug,Added dredge and transplanted with the hopes of expansion,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,180.8,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,Almost no info on this or if there was one,1994,ND,Winter,8,"3, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96",3,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,1580,3520,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,SCEMP,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NEMS4,NEMS4_Plot1of1,NEMS4_Plot1of1_1995,Grey literature,"Merkel, NBC, Navy",San Diego Bay,"Coronado, Delta Beach ",32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Plug,Added dredge and transplanted with the hopes of expansion,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,180.8,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,Almost no info on this or if there was one,1994,ND,Winter,8,"3, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96",12,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,1580,5000,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NEMS4,NEMS4_Plot1of1,NEMS4_Plot1of1_1996,Grey literature,"Merkel, NBC, Navy",San Diego Bay,"Coronado, Delta Beach ",32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Plug,Added dredge and transplanted with the hopes of expansion,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,180.8,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,Almost no info on this or if there was one,1994,ND,Winter,8,"3, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96",24,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,1580,4570,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NEMS4,NEMS4_Plot1of1,NEMS4_Plot1of1_1997,Grey literature,"Merkel, NBC, Navy",San Diego Bay,"Coronado, Delta Beach ",32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Plug,Added dredge and transplanted with the hopes of expansion,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,180.8,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,Almost no info on this or if there was one,1994,ND,Winter,8,"3, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96",36,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,1580,4650,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NEMS4,NEMS4_Plot1of1,NEMS4_Plot1of1_1998,Grey literature,"Merkel, NBC, Navy",San Diego Bay,"Coronado, Delta Beach ",32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Plug,Added dredge and transplanted with the hopes of expansion,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,180.8,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,Almost no info on this or if there was one,1994,ND,Winter,8,"3, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96",48,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,1580,190,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,SCEMP,N,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NEMS4,NEMS4_Plot1of1,NEMS4_Plot1of1_1999,Grey literature,"Merkel, NBC, Navy",San Diego Bay,"Coronado, Delta Beach ",32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Plug,Added dredge and transplanted with the hopes of expansion,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,180.8,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,Almost no info on this or if there was one,1994,ND,Winter,8,"3, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96",60,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,1580,3800,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,SCEMP,N,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NEMS4,NEMS4_Plot1of1,NEMS4_Plot1of1_2000,Grey literature,"Merkel, NBC, Navy",San Diego Bay,"Coronado, Delta Beach ",32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Plug,Added dredge and transplanted with the hopes of expansion,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,180.8,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,Almost no info on this or if there was one,1994,ND,Winter,8,"3, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96",72,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,1580,4840,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NEMS4,NEMS4_Plot1of1,NEMS4_Plot1of1_2001,Grey literature,"Merkel, NBC, Navy",San Diego Bay,"Coronado, Delta Beach ",32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Plug,Added dredge and transplanted with the hopes of expansion,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,180.8,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,Almost no info on this or if there was one,1994,ND,Winter,8,"3, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96",84,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,1580,5130,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NEMS4,NEMS4_Plot1of1,NEMS4_Plot1of1_2002,Grey literature,"Merkel, NBC, Navy",San Diego Bay,"Coronado, Delta Beach ",32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Plug,Added dredge and transplanted with the hopes of expansion,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,180.8,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,Almost no info on this or if there was one,1994,ND,Winter,8,"3, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96",96,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,1580,460,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,SCEMP,N,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NEMS6,NEMS6_Plot1of1,NEMS6_Plot1of1_3mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,San Diego Bay,"Coronado, Delta Beach ",32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,Biodegradable soft anchors,NA,N,In same bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,1999,March,Spring,5,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",3,6.17,ND,-2 to -9 ft MLLW ,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,10,51.6,17.5,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,Y,"Areas are listed as NAs becuase these restorations where putting plots into a patchy area where eelgrass already existed, so the areas are disingeuous. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NEMS6,NEMS6_Plot1of1,NEMS6_Plot1of1_6mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,San Diego Bay,"Coronado, Delta Beach ",32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,Biodegradable soft anchors,NA,N,In same bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,1999,March ,Spring,5,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",6,6.17,ND,-2 to -9 ft MLLW ,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,10,137.1,46.9,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,Y,"Areas are listed as NAs becuase these restorations where putting plots into a patchy area where eelgrass already existed, so the areas are disingeuous. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NEMS6,NEMS6_Plot1of1,NEMS6_Plot1of1_12mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,San Diego Bay,"Coronado, Delta Beach ",32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,Biodegradable soft anchors,NA,N,In same bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,1999,March ,Spring,5,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",12,6.17,ND,-2 to -9 ft MLLW ,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,10,188.8,52.2,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,Y,"Areas are listed as NAs becuase these restorations where putting plots into a patchy area where eelgrass already existed, so the areas are disingeuous. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NEMS6,NEMS6_Plot1of1,NEMS6_Plot1of1_24mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,San Diego Bay,"Coronado, Delta Beach ",32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,Biodegradable soft anchors,NA,N,In same bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,1999,March ,Spring,5,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",24,6.17,ND,-2 to -9 ft MLLW ,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,10,162.4,54.2,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,Y,"Areas are listed as NAs becuase these restorations where putting plots into a patchy area where eelgrass already existed, so the areas are disingeuous. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NEMS6,NEMS6_Plot1of1,NEMS6_Plot1of1_36mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,San Diego Bay,"Coronado, Delta Beach ",32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,Biodegradable soft anchors,NA,N,In same bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,1999,March ,Spring,5,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",36,6.17,ND,-2 to -9 ft MLLW ,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,10,114.4,59.5,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,Y,"Areas are listed as NAs becuase these restorations where putting plots into a patchy area where eelgrass already existed, so the areas are disingeuous. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NEMS6,NEMS6_Plot1of1,NEMS6_Plot1of1_48mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,San Diego Bay,"Coronado, Delta Beach ",32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,Biodegradable soft anchors,NA,N,In same bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,1999,March ,Spring,5,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",48,6.17,ND,-2 to -9 ft MLLW ,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,10,156,44.6,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,Y,"Areas are listed as NAs becuase these restorations where putting plots into a patchy area where eelgrass already existed, so the areas are disingeuous. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NEMS6,NEMS6_Plot1of1,NEMS6_Plot1of1_60mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,San Diego Bay,"Coronado, Delta Beach ",32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,Biodegradable soft anchors,NA,N,In same bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,1999,March,Spring,5,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",60,6.17,ND,-2 to -9 ft MLLW ,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,10,217.6,47.22,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,Y,"Areas are listed as NAs becuase these restorations where putting plots into a patchy area where eelgrass already existed, so the areas are disingeuous. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
BristolCove,BristolCove_Plot1of1,BristolCove_Plot1of1_12mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,Agua Hedionda Lagoon,NA,33.14,-117.32,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,Biodegradable soft anchors,NA,Y,In same bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,192,40.79,ND,ND,Don't note anything abour ref at the time of transplant,1999,February,Winter,5,"12, 24, 36, 48, 60",12,1.38,ND,0 to -6 MLLW,ND,ND,ND,3440,3925.5,10,165.3,12.46,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,NA,8-12 turion/unit on 3ft centers,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
BristolCove,BristolCove_Plot1of1,BristolCove_Plot1of1_24mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,Agua Hedionda Lagoon,NA,33.14,-117.32,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,Biodegradable soft anchors,NA,Y,In same bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,194,38.6,ND,ND,Don't note anything abour ref at the time of transplant,1999,February,Winter,5,"12, 24, 36, 48, 60",24,1.38,ND,0 to -6 MLLW,ND,ND,ND,3440,3156.5,10,136,21.3,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,NA,8-12 turion/unit on 3ft centers,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
BristolCove,BristolCove_Plot1of1,BristolCove_Plot1of1_36mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,Agua Hedionda Lagoon,NA,33.14,-117.32,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,Biodegradable soft anchors,NA,Y,In same bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,200,16.4,ND,ND,Don't note anything abour ref at the time of transplant,1999,February,Winter,5,"12, 24, 36, 48, 60",36,1.38,ND,0 to -6 MLLW,ND,ND,ND,3440,2428.1,10,144.8,53.2,ND,ND,SCEMP,N,NA,8-12 turion/unit on 3ft centers,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
BristolCove,BristolCove_Plot1of1,BristolCove_Plot1of1_48mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,Agua Hedionda Lagoon,NA,33.14,-117.32,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,Biodegradable soft anchors,NA,Y,In same bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,412.8,150.8,ND,ND,Don't note anything abour ref at the time of transplant,1999,February,Winter,5,"12, 24, 36, 48, 60",48,1.38,ND,0 to -6 MLLW,ND,ND,ND,3440,16187.4,10,169.6,41.8,ND,ND,SCEMP,N,NA,8-12 turion/unit on 3ft centers,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
BristolCove,BristolCove_Plot1of1,BristolCove_Plot1of1_60mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,Agua Hedionda Lagoon,NA,33.14,-117.32,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,Biodegradable soft anchors,NA,Y,In same bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,Don't note anything abour ref at the time of transplant,1999,February,Winter,5,"12, 24, 36, 48, 60",60,1.38,ND,0 to -6 MLLW,ND,ND,ND,3440,242.8,10,ND,ND,ND,ND,SCEMP,N,NA,8-12 turion/unit on 3ft centers,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SunsetHarbor_Dredging,SunsetHarbor_Dredging_Plot1of1,SunsetHarbor_Dredging_Plot1of1_12mo,Grey literature,CRM,Huntington Harbor,"Sunset Bay, Huntington Harbor",33.73,-118.08,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,Biodegradable line and sediment anchoring device,"No supp transplants mid project, but they note that this 2002 restoration was due to some failed restoration in 2000 that had initially been planned. ",Y,"In same bay, used 3 different donor beds to increase gen diversity",ND,165.5,127,ND,105,41,ND,ND,Similar depth to transplant bed (-2.9 ft MLLW to -4.8 ft),2002,July ,Summer,5,"12, 24, 36, 48, 60",12,1.3,ND,-1.4 to -5.3 MLLW ,ND,ND,2776 to 3470,347,265,9,134,41,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,Y,"The intended damage they mitigation for didn't occur to the extent planned, so they earned a mitigation ""credit"" for future damage. 8-10 shoots per bundle, each bundle on 1 m centers. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,Y,See table 3,Y,Not quantitative but list (table 3) all the species observed. ,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SunsetHarbor_Dredging,SunsetHarbor_Dredging_Plot1of1,SunsetHarbor_Dredging_Plot1of1_24mo,Grey literature,CRM,Huntington Harbor,"Sunset Bay, Huntington Harbor",33.73,-118.08,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,Biodegradable line and sediment anchoring device,"No supp transplants mid project, but they note that this 2002 restoration was due to some failed restoration in 2000 that had initially been planned. ",Y,"In same bay, used 3 different donor beds to increase gen diversity",ND,439.6,127,ND,244,127,ND,ND,Similar depth to transplant bed (-2.9 ft MLLW to -4.8 ft),2002,July ,Summer,5,"12, 24, 36, 48, 60",24,1.3,ND,-1.4 to -5.3 MLLW ,ND,ND,2776 to 3470,347,432.3,9,213,82.9,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,Y,"The intended damage they mitigation for didn't occur to the extent planned, so they earned a mitigation ""credit"" for future damage. 8-10 shoots per bundle, each bundle on 1 m centers. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,Y,See table 3,Y,Not quantitative but list (table 3) all the species observed. ,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SunsetHarbor_Dredging,SunsetHarbor_Dredging_Plot1of1,SunsetHarbor_Dredging_Plot1of1_36mo,Grey literature,CRM,Huntington Harbor,"Sunset Bay, Huntington Harbor",33.73,-118.08,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,Biodegradable line and sediment anchoring device,"No supp transplants mid project, but they note that this 2002 restoration was due to some failed restoration in 2000 that had initially been planned. ",Y,"In same bay, used 3 different donor beds to increase gen diversity",ND,319,127,ND,370.6,83.9,ND,ND,Similar depth to transplant bed (-2.9 ft MLLW to -4.8 ft),2002,July ,Summer,5,"12, 24, 36, 48, 60",36,1.3,ND,-1.4 to -5.3 MLLW ,ND,ND,2776 to 3470,347,333,9,383.8,164,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,Y,"The intended damage they mitigation for didn't occur to the extent planned, so they earned a mitigation ""credit"" for future damage. 8-10 shoots per bundle, each bundle on 1 m centers. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,Y,See table 3,Y,Not quantitative but list (table 3) all the species observed. ,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SunsetHarbor_Dredging,SunsetHarbor_Dredging_Plot1of1,SunsetHarbor_Dredging_Plot1of1_48mo,Grey literature,CRM,Huntington Harbor,"Sunset Bay, Huntington Harbor",33.73,-118.08,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,Biodegradable line and sediment anchoring device,"No supp transplants mid project, but they note that this 2002 restoration was due to some failed restoration in 2000 that had initially been planned. ",Y,"In same bay, used 3 different donor beds to increase gen diversity",ND,376.6,127,ND,371.9,108.9,ND,ND,Similar depth to transplant bed (-2.9 ft MLLW to -4.8 ft),2002,July ,Summer,5,"12, 24, 36, 48, 60",48,1.3,ND,-1.4 to -5.3 MLLW ,ND,ND,2776 to 3470,347,485.9,9,248.2,118.4,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,Y,"The intended damage they mitigation for didn't occur to the extent planned, so they earned a mitigation ""credit"" for future damage. 8-10 shoots per bundle, each bundle on 1 m centers. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,Y,See table 3,Y,Not quantitative but list (table 3) all the species observed. ,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SunsetHarbor_Dredging,SunsetHarbor_Dredging_Plot1of1,SunsetHarbor_Dredging_Plot1of1_60mo,Grey literature,CRM,Huntington Harbor,"Sunset Bay, Huntington Harbor",33.73,-118.08,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,Biodegradable line and sediment anchoring device,"No supp transplants mid project, but they note that this 2002 restoration was due to some failed restoration in 2000 that had initially been planned. ",Y,"In same bay, used 3 different donor beds to increase gen diversity",ND,310.4,127,ND,213.9,80.5,ND,ND,Similar depth to transplant bed (-2.9 ft MLLW to -4.8 ft),2002,July,Summer,5,"12, 24, 36, 48, 60",60,1.3,ND,-1.4 to -5.3 MLLW ,ND,ND,2776 to 3470,347,489.7,9,224.6,48,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,Y,"The intended damage they mitigation for didn't occur to the extent planned, so they earned a mitigation ""credit"" for future damage. 8-10 shoots per bundle, each bundle on 1 m centers. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,Y,See table 3,Y,Not quantitative but list (table 3) all the species observed. ,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
EastSkiIsland_MissionBay,EastSkiIsland_MissionBay_Plot1of1,EastSkiIsland_MissionBay_Plot1of1_3mo,Grey literature,CRM,Mission Bay,East ski island ,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,"Almost no methods details at all, but the did collect from a donor bed, bundle and transplant in PUs. ",NA,Y,Same bay,ND,ND,118,ND,115,ND,68,68,No areal data for ref,1995,July ,Summer,6,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72",3,1.15,ND,ND,ND,ND,289428,21367,20032,13.6,11.5,ND,100,93,SCEMP,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,Y,"Many fish species listed, lots of anemones on blades, and round rays",ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
EastSkiIsland_MissionBay,EastSkiIsland_MissionBay_Plot1of1,EastSkiIsland_MissionBay_Plot1of1_6mo,Grey literature,CRM,Mission Bay,East ski island ,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,"Almost no methods details at all, but the did collect from a donor bed, bundle and transplant in PUs. ",NA,Y,Same bay,ND,ND,118,ND,109,ND,68,82,No areal data for ref,1995,July ,Summer,6,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72",6,1.15,ND,ND,ND,ND,289428,21367,19263,13.6,96,ND,100,90,SCEMP,Y,Y,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,Y,"Many fish species listed, lots of anemones on blades, and round rays",ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
EastSkiIsland_MissionBay,EastSkiIsland_MissionBay_Plot1of1,EastSkiIsland_MissionBay_Plot1of1_12mo,Grey literature,CRM,Mission Bay,East ski island ,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,"Almost no methods details at all, but the did collect from a donor bed, bundle and transplant in PUs. ",NA,Y,Same bay,ND,ND,118,ND,195,ND,68,91,No areal data for ref,1995,July ,Summer,6,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72",12,1.15,ND,ND,ND,ND,289428,21367,20396,13.6,221.6,ND,100,95,SCEMP,Y,Y,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,Y,"Many fish species listed, lots of anemones on blades, and round rays",ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
EastSkiIsland_MissionBay,EastSkiIsland_MissionBay_Plot1of1,EastSkiIsland_MissionBay_Plot1of1_24mo,Grey literature,CRM,Mission Bay,East ski island ,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,"Almost no methods details at all, but the did collect from a donor bed, bundle and transplant in PUs. ",NA,Y,Same bay,ND,ND,118,ND,196,ND,68,85,No areal data for ref,1995,July ,Summer,6,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72",24,1.15,ND,ND,ND,ND,289428,21367,21327,13.6,324.4,ND,100,99,SCEMP,Y,Y,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,Y,"Many fish species listed, lots of anemones on blades, and round rays",ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
EastSkiIsland_MissionBay,EastSkiIsland_MissionBay_Plot1of1,EastSkiIsland_MissionBay_Plot1of1_36mo,Grey literature,CRM,Mission Bay,East ski island ,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,"Almost no methods details at all, but the did collect from a donor bed, bundle and transplant in PUs. ",NA,Y,Same bay,ND,ND,118,ND,107.2,ND,68,70,No areal data for ref,1995,July,Summer,6,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72",36,1.15,ND,ND,ND,ND,289428,21367,21002,13.6,216.4,ND,100,98,SCEMP,Y,Y,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,Y,"Many fish species listed, lots of anemones on blades, and round rays",ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
EastSkiIsland_MissionBay,EastSkiIsland_MissionBay_Plot1of1,EastSkiIsland_MissionBay_Plot1of1_48mo,Grey literature,CRM,Mission Bay,East ski island ,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,"Almost no methods details at all, but the did collect from a donor bed, bundle and transplant in PUs. ",NA,Y,Same bay,ND,ND,118,ND,79.6,ND,68,46,No areal data for ref,1995,July,Summer,6,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72",48,1.15,ND,ND,ND,ND,289428,21367,9562,13.6,116.8,ND,100,45,SCEMP,N,Y,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,Y,"Many fish species listed, lots of anemones on blades, and round rays",ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
EastSkiIsland_MissionBay,EastSkiIsland_MissionBay_Plot1of1,EastSkiIsland_MissionBay_Plot1of1_60mo,Grey literature,CRM,Mission Bay,East ski island ,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,"Almost no methods details at all, but the did collect from a donor bed, bundle and transplant in PUs. ",NA,Y,Same bay,ND,ND,118,ND,134.9,ND,68,43,No areal data for ref,1995,July,Summer,6,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72",60,1.15,ND,ND,ND,ND,289428,21367,15215,13.6,182.8,ND,100,71,SCEMP,N,N,"They saw declines in the tranplanted bed and the control bed, with declines in shoot density to not meet SCEMP criteria after yr 3. However, they qualify it as a success given the success in the first few years and the co-occurring decline in the control meadow.",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,Y,"Many fish species listed, lots of anemones on blades, and round rays",ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
EastSkiIsland_MissionBay,EastSkiIsland_MissionBay_Plot1of1,EastSkiIsland_MissionBay_Plot1of1_72mo,Grey literature,CRM,Mission Bay,East ski island ,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,"Almost no methods details at all, but the did collect from a donor bed, bundle and transplant in PUs. ",NA,Y,Same bay,ND,ND,118,ND,71.6,ND,68,22,No areal data for ref,1995,July,Summer,6,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72",72,1.15,ND,ND,ND,ND,289428,21367,8905,13.6,96.4,ND,100,42,SCEMP,N,N,"They saw declines in the tranplanted bed and the control bed, with declines in shoot density to not meet SCEMP criteria after yr 3. However, they qualify it as a success given the success in the first few years and the co-occurring decline in the control meadow.",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,Y,"Many fish species listed, lots of anemones on blades, and round rays",ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
ChannelShoals_MissionBay,ChannelShoals_MissionBay_Plot1of1,ChannelShoals_MissionBay_Plot1of1_3mo,Grey literature,CRM,Mission Bay,NA,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,"Almost no methods details at all, but the did collect from a donor bed, bundle and transplant in PUs. ",NA,Y,Same bay,ND,ND,219,ND,218,ND,84,91,No areal data for ref,1996,May,Spring,5,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",3,6.5,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,14300,6700,12.1,9.3,ND,100,47,SCEMP,NA,NA,"Not quite sure how they determine % cover. They start with 100% which seems odd so I may not use these values. Also, 6.5 was used to to bank mitigation credits. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
ChannelShoals_MissionBay,ChannelShoals_MissionBay_Plot1of1,ChannelShoals_MissionBay_Plot1of1_6mo,Grey literature,CRM,Mission Bay,NA,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,"Almost no methods details at all, but the did collect from a donor bed, bundle and transplant in PUs. ",NA,Y,Same bay,ND,ND,219,ND,283,ND,84,93,No areal data for ref,1996,May,Spring,5,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",6,6.5,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,14300,6000,12.1,13.7,ND,100,42.2,SCEMP,Y,Y,"Not quite sure how they determine % cover. They start with 100% which seems odd so I may not use these values. Also, 6.5 was used to to bank mitigation credits. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
ChannelShoals_MissionBay,ChannelShoals_MissionBay_Plot1of1,ChannelShoals_MissionBay_Plot1of1_12mo,Grey literature,CRM,Mission Bay,NA,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,"Almost no methods details at all, but the did collect from a donor bed, bundle and transplant in PUs. ",NA,Y,Same bay,ND,ND,219,ND,271,ND,84,95,No areal data for ref,1996,May,Spring,5,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",12,6.5,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,14300,5200,12.1,200,ND,100,36.5,SCEMP,N,Y,"Not quite sure how they determine % cover. They start with 100% which seems odd so I may not use these values. Also, 6.5 was used to to bank mitigation credits. Here, like above, they really don't really meet the areal coverage requirement (100% areal coverage of tranaplant area), rather, the area was declining. But becuase they over mitigated, they call it a success. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
ChannelShoals_MissionBay,ChannelShoals_MissionBay_Plot1of1,ChannelShoals_MissionBay_Plot1of1_24mo,Grey literature,CRM,Mission Bay,NA,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,"Almost no methods details at all, but the did collect from a donor bed, bundle and transplant in PUs. ",NA,Y,Same bay,ND,ND,219,ND,232.5,ND,84,96,No areal data for ref,1996,May,Spring,5,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",24,6.5,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,14300,6900,12.1,227.5,ND,100,48.5,SCEMP,N,Y,"Not quite sure how they determine % cover. They start with 100% which seems odd so I may not use these values. Also, 6.5 was used to to bank mitigation credits. Here, like above, they really don't really meet the areal coverage requirement (100% areal coverage of tranaplant area), rather, the area was declining. But becuase they over mitigated, they call it a success. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
ChannelShoals_MissionBay,ChannelShoals_MissionBay_Plot1of1,ChannelShoals_MissionBay_Plot1of1_36mo,Grey literature,CRM,Mission Bay,NA,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,"Almost no methods details at all, but the did collect from a donor bed, bundle and transplant in PUs. ",NA,Y,Same bay,ND,ND,219,ND,242,ND,84,96.3,No areal data for ref,1996,May,Spring,5,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",36,6.5,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,14300,9800,12.1,214,ND,100,69.1,SCEMP,N,Y,"Not quite sure how they determine % cover. They start with 100% which seems odd so I may not use these values. Also, 6.5 was used to to bank mitigation credits. Here, like above, they really don't really meet the areal coverage requirement (100% areal coverage of tranaplant area), rather, the area was declining. But becuase they over mitigated, they call it a success. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
ChannelShoals_MissionBay,ChannelShoals_MissionBay_Plot1of1,ChannelShoals_MissionBay_Plot1of1_48mo,Grey literature,CRM,Mission Bay,NA,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,"Almost no methods details at all, but the did collect from a donor bed, bundle and transplant in PUs. ",NA,Y,Same bay,ND,ND,219,ND,318.9,ND,84,83.6,No areal data for ref,1996,May,Spring,5,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",48,6.5,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,14300,8600,12.1,314.7,ND,100,60.4,SCEMP,N,Y,"Not quite sure how they determine % cover. They start with 100% which seems odd so I may not use these values. Also, 6.5 was used to to bank mitigation credits. Here, like above, they really don't really meet the areal coverage requirement (100% areal coverage of tranaplant area), rather, the area was declining. But becuase they over mitigated, they call it a success. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
ChannelShoals_MissionBay,ChannelShoals_MissionBay_Plot1of1,ChannelShoals_MissionBay_Plot1of1_60mo,Grey literature,CRM,Mission Bay,NA,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,"Almost no methods details at all, but the did collect from a donor bed, bundle and transplant in PUs. ",NA,Y,Same bay,ND,ND,219,ND,306.6,ND,84,88.4,No areal data for ref,1996,May,Spring,5,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",60,6.5,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,14300,8200,12.1,267.1,ND,100,57.4,SCEMP,N,Y,"Not quite sure how they determine % cover. They start with 100% which seems odd so I may not use these values. Also, 6.5 was used to to bank mitigation credits. Here, like above, they really don't really meet the areal coverage requirement (100% areal coverage of tranaplant area), rather, the area was declining. But becuase they over mitigated, they call it a success. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NorthCove_MissionBay,NorthCove_MissionBay_Plot1of1,NorthCove_MissionBay_Plot1of1_3mo,Grey literature,CRM,Mission Bay,NA,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,"Almost no methods details at all, but the did collect from a donor bed, bundle and transplant in PUs. ",NA,Y,Same bay,ND,ND,202,ND,274,ND,96,100,No areal data for ref,1996,June,Summer,5,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",3,1.3,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,2127,2113,12.4,17.3,ND,100,99.3,SCEMP,NA,NA,"They don't separate the success by each project, making it difficult to evaluate each. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NorthCove_MissionBay,NorthCove_MissionBay_Plot1of1,NorthCove_MissionBay_Plot1of1_6mo,Grey literature,CRM,Mission Bay,NA,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,"Almost no methods details at all, but the did collect from a donor bed, bundle and transplant in PUs. ",NA,Y,Same bay,ND,ND,202,ND,243,ND,96,100,No areal data for ref,1996,June,Summer,5,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",6,1.3,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,2127,2127,12.4,25.4,ND,100,100,SCEMP,NA,NA,"They don't separate the success by each project, making it difficult to evaluate each. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NorthCove_MissionBay,NorthCove_MissionBay_Plot1of1,NorthCove_MissionBay_Plot1of1_12mo,Grey literature,CRM,Mission Bay,NA,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,"Almost no methods details at all, but the did collect from a donor bed, bundle and transplant in PUs. ",NA,Y,Same bay,ND,ND,202,ND,327.6,ND,96,100,No areal data for ref,1996,June,Summer,5,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",12,1.3,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,2127,2127,12.4,380.5,ND,100,100,SCEMP,NA,NA,"They don't separate the success by each project, making it difficult to evaluate each. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NorthCove_MissionBay,NorthCove_MissionBay_Plot1of1,NorthCove_MissionBay_Plot1of1_24mo,Grey literature,CRM,Mission Bay,NA,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,"Almost no methods details at all, but the did collect from a donor bed, bundle and transplant in PUs. ",NA,Y,Same bay,ND,ND,202,ND,148,ND,96,75,No areal data for ref,1996,June,Summer,5,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",24,1.3,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,2127,1773,12.4,186.6,ND,100,88.3,SCEMP,NA,NA,"They don't separate the success by each project, making it difficult to evaluate each. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NorthCove_MissionBay,NorthCove_MissionBay_Plot1of1,NorthCove_MissionBay_Plot1of1_36mo,Grey literature,CRM,Mission Bay,NA,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,"Almost no methods details at all, but the did collect from a donor bed, bundle and transplant in PUs. ",NA,Y,Same bay,ND,ND,202,ND,147,ND,96,96.4,No areal data for ref,1996,June,Summer,5,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",36,1.3,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,2127,2127,12.4,242.1,ND,100,100,SCEMP,NA,NA,"They don't separate the success by each project, making it difficult to evaluate each. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NorthCove_MissionBay,NorthCove_MissionBay_Plot1of1,NorthCove_MissionBay_Plot1of1_48mo,Grey literature,CRM,Mission Bay,NA,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,"Almost no methods details at all, but the did collect from a donor bed, bundle and transplant in PUs. ",NA,Y,Same bay,ND,ND,202,ND,331.5,ND,96,98.6,No areal data for ref,1996,June,Summer,5,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",48,1.3,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,2127,1925,12.4,382.7,ND,100,90.5,SCEMP,NA,NA,"They don't separate the success by each project, making it difficult to evaluate each. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NorthCove_MissionBay,NorthCove_MissionBay_Plot1of1,NorthCove_MissionBay_Plot1of1_60mo,Grey literature,CRM,Mission Bay,NA,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,"Almost no methods details at all, but the did collect from a donor bed, bundle and transplant in PUs. ",NA,Y,Same bay,ND,ND,202,ND,207.4,ND,96,96.4,No areal data for ref,1996,June,Summer,5,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",60,1.3,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,2127,1983,12.4,253.1,ND,100,93.2,SCEMP,NA,NA,"They don't separate the success by each project, making it difficult to evaluate each. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NorthCrownPt_MissionBay,NorthCrownPt_MissionBay_Plot1of1,NorthCrownPt_MissionBay_Plot1of1_3mo,Grey literature,CRM,Mission Bay,NA,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,"Almost no methods details at all, but the did collect from a donor bed, bundle and transplant in PUs. ",NA,Y,Same bay,ND,ND,322,ND,498,ND,77,100,No areal data for ref,1996,June,Summer,5,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",3,1.3,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,623,623,12.4,18.6,ND,100,100,SCEMP,NA,NA,"They don't separate the success by each project, making it difficult to evaluate each. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NorthCrownPt_MissionBay,NorthCrownPt_MissionBay_Plot1of1,NorthCrownPt_MissionBay_Plot1of1_6mo,Grey literature,CRM,Mission Bay,NA,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,"Almost no methods details at all, but the did collect from a donor bed, bundle and transplant in PUs. ",NA,Y,Same bay,ND,ND,322,ND,243,ND,77,99.3,No areal data for ref,1996,June,Summer,5,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",6,1.3,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,623,619,12.4,33.9,ND,100,99.4,SCEMP,NA,NA,"They don't separate the success by each project, making it difficult to evaluate each. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NorthCrownPt_MissionBay,NorthCrownPt_MissionBay_Plot1of1,NorthCrownPt_MissionBay_Plot1of1_12mo,Grey literature,CRM,Mission Bay,NA,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,"Almost no methods details at all, but the did collect from a donor bed, bundle and transplant in PUs. ",NA,Y,Same bay,ND,ND,322,ND,311.6,ND,77,100,No areal data for ref,1996,June,Summer,5,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",12,1.3,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,623,623,12.4,471.2,ND,100,100,SCEMP,NA,NA,"They don't separate the success by each project, making it difficult to evaluate each. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NorthCrownPt_MissionBay,NorthCrownPt_MissionBay_Plot1of1,NorthCrownPt_MissionBay_Plot1of1_24mo,Grey literature,CRM,Mission Bay,NA,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,"Almost no methods details at all, but the did collect from a donor bed, bundle and transplant in PUs. ",NA,Y,Same bay,ND,ND,322,ND,232,ND,77,88.3,No areal data for ref,1996,June,Summer,5,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",24,1.3,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,623,550,12.4,274.7,ND,100,88.3,SCEMP,NA,NA,"They don't separate the success by each project, making it difficult to evaluate each. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NorthCrownPt_MissionBay,NorthCrownPt_MissionBay_Plot1of1,NorthCrownPt_MissionBay_Plot1of1_36mo,Grey literature,CRM,Mission Bay,NA,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,"Almost no methods details at all, but the did collect from a donor bed, bundle and transplant in PUs. ",NA,Y,Same bay,ND,ND,322,ND,170,ND,77,92,No areal data for ref,1996,June,Summer,5,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",36,1.3,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,623,623,12.4,308,ND,100,100,SCEMP,NA,NA,"They don't separate the success by each project, making it difficult to evaluate each. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NorthCrownPt_MissionBay,NorthCrownPt_MissionBay_Plot1of1,NorthCrownPt_MissionBay_Plot1of1_48mo,Grey literature,CRM,Mission Bay,NA,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,"Almost no methods details at all, but the did collect from a donor bed, bundle and transplant in PUs. ",NA,Y,Same bay,ND,ND,322,ND,221.1,ND,77,93.6,No areal data for ref,1996,June,Summer,5,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",48,1.3,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,623,583,12.4,304.3,ND,100,93.6,SCEMP,NA,NA,"They don't separate the success by each project, making it difficult to evaluate each. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NorthCrownPt_MissionBay,NorthCrownPt_MissionBay_Plot1of1,NorthCrownPt_MissionBay_Plot1of1_60mo,Grey literature,CRM,Mission Bay,NA,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,"Almost no methods details at all, but the did collect from a donor bed, bundle and transplant in PUs. ",NA,Y,Same bay,ND,ND,322,ND,308.8,ND,77,98,No areal data for ref,1996,June,Summer,5,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",60,1.3,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,623,452,12.4,721.6,ND,100,72.6,SCEMP,NA,NA,"They don't separate the success by each project, making it difficult to evaluate each. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
DeAnzaPt_MissionBay,DeAnzaPt_MissionBay_Plot1of1,DeAnzaPt_MissionBay_Plot1of1_3mo,Grey literature,CRM,Mission Bay,NA,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,"Almost no methods details at all, but the did collect from a donor bed, bundle and transplant in PUs. ",NA,Y,Same bay,ND,ND,199,ND,158,ND,95,95,No areal data for ref,1996,June,Summer,5,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",3,1.3,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,3157,2699,12.4,7.5,ND,100,85.5,SCEMP,NA,NA,"They don't separate the success by each project, making it difficult to evaluate each. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
DeAnzaPt_MissionBay,DeAnzaPt_MissionBay_Plot1of1,DeAnzaPt_MissionBay_Plot1of1_6mo,Grey literature,CRM,Mission Bay,NA,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,"Almost no methods details at all, but the did collect from a donor bed, bundle and transplant in PUs. ",NA,Y,Same bay,ND,ND,199,ND,185,ND,95,92.7,No areal data for ref,1996,June,Summer,5,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",6,1.3,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,3157,2979,12.4,15,ND,100,94.4,SCEMP,NA,NA,"They don't separate the success by each project, making it difficult to evaluate each. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
DeAnzaPt_MissionBay,DeAnzaPt_MissionBay_Plot1of1,DeAnzaPt_MissionBay_Plot1of1_12mo,Grey literature,CRM,Mission Bay,NA,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,"Almost no methods details at all, but the did collect from a donor bed, bundle and transplant in PUs. ",NA,Y,Same bay,ND,ND,199,ND,74.4,ND,95,82,No areal data for ref,1996,June,Summer,5,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",12,1.3,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,3157,2841,12.4,103.6,ND,100,90,SCEMP,NA,NA,"They don't separate the success by each project, making it difficult to evaluate each. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
DeAnzaPt_MissionBay,DeAnzaPt_MissionBay_Plot1of1,DeAnzaPt_MissionBay_Plot1of1_24mo,Grey literature,CRM,Mission Bay,NA,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,"Almost no methods details at all, but the did collect from a donor bed, bundle and transplant in PUs. ",NA,Y,Same bay,ND,ND,199,ND,136.5,ND,95,66.7,No areal data for ref,1996,June,Summer,5,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",24,1.3,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,3157,2264,12.4,135.5,ND,100,71.7,SCEMP,NA,NA,"They don't separate the success by each project, making it difficult to evaluate each. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
DeAnzaPt_MissionBay,DeAnzaPt_MissionBay_Plot1of1,DeAnzaPt_MissionBay_Plot1of1_36mo,Grey literature,CRM,Mission Bay,NA,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,"Almost no methods details at all, but the did collect from a donor bed, bundle and transplant in PUs. ",NA,Y,Same bay,ND,ND,199,ND,69.6,ND,95,32,No areal data for ref,1996,June,Summer,5,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",36,1.3,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,3157,1894,12.4,53.5,ND,100,60,SCEMP,NA,NA,"They don't separate the success by each project, making it difficult to evaluate each. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
DeAnzaPt_MissionBay,DeAnzaPt_MissionBay_Plot1of1,DeAnzaPt_MissionBay_Plot1of1_48mo,Grey literature,CRM,Mission Bay,NA,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,"Almost no methods details at all, but the did collect from a donor bed, bundle and transplant in PUs. ",NA,Y,Same bay,ND,ND,199,ND,247.2,ND,95,93.8,No areal data for ref,1996,June,Summer,5,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",48,1.3,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,3157,2787,12.4,241.1,ND,100,88.3,SCEMP,NA,NA,"They don't separate the success by each project, making it difficult to evaluate each. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
DeAnzaPt_MissionBay,DeAnzaPt_MissionBay_Plot1of1,DeAnzaPt_MissionBay_Plot1of1_60mo,Grey literature,CRM,Mission Bay,NA,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,"Almost no methods details at all, but the did collect from a donor bed, bundle and transplant in PUs. ",NA,Y,Same bay,ND,ND,199,ND,209.6,ND,95,69.4,No areal data for ref,1996,June,Summer,5,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",60,1.3,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,3157,2769,12.4,192.4,ND,100,87.7,SCEMP,NA,NA,"They don't separate the success by each project, making it difficult to evaluate each. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NHarborDrive_SDBay,NHarborDrive_SDBay_Plot1of1,NHarborDrive_SDBay_Plot1of1_3mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,San Diego Bay,NA,32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Use of ""bio-degradeable soft anchors to fasten bare-root units to the bottom.""",NA,Y,"Same bay, not more than 10% harvested",1028,1028,ND,ND,238,ND,ND,ND,NA,2009,October,Fall,4,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48",3,3.3,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,932,932,10,81.1,ND,ND,ND,SCEMP,NA,NA,8-12 shoots per bundle on 1 m centers,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NHarborDrive_SDBay,NHarborDrive_SDBay_Plot1of1,NHarborDrive_SDBay_Plot1of1_6mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,San Diego Bay,NA,32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Use of ""bio-degradeable soft anchors to fasten bare-root units to the bottom.""",NA,Y,"Same bay, not more than 10% harvested",1028,988,ND,ND,167.2,ND,ND,ND,NA,2009,October,Fall,4,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48",6,3.3,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,932,268,10,78.6,ND,ND,ND,SCEMP,NA,NA,8-12 shoots per bundle on 1 m centers,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NHarborDrive_SDBay,NHarborDrive_SDBay_Plot1of1,NHarborDrive_SDBay_Plot1of1_12mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,San Diego Bay,NA,32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Use of ""bio-degradeable soft anchors to fasten bare-root units to the bottom.""",NA,Y,"Same bay, not more than 10% harvested",1028,934,ND,ND,228.3,97.8,ND,ND,NA,2009,October,Fall,4,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48",12,3.3,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,932,326,10,98.7,90,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,Y,"Shoot densities in blue failed the non ref adjusted mitigation requirement, but met the ref adjusted one. 8-12 shoots per bundle on 1 m centers",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NHarborDrive_SDBay,NHarborDrive_SDBay_Plot1of1,NHarborDrive_SDBay_Plot1of1_24mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,San Diego Bay,NA,32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Use of ""bio-degradeable soft anchors to fasten bare-root units to the bottom.""",NA,Y,"Same bay, not more than 10% harvested",1028,976,ND,ND,169.6,82.6,ND,ND,NA,2009,October,Fall,4,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48",24,3.3,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,932,376,10,155.9,91.4,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,Y,8-12 shoots per bundle on 1 m centers,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NHarborDrive_SDBay,NHarborDrive_SDBay_Plot1of1,NHarborDrive_SDBay_Plot1of1_36mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,San Diego Bay,NA,32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Use of ""bio-degradeable soft anchors to fasten bare-root units to the bottom.""",NA,Y,"Same bay, not more than 10% harvested",1028,920,ND,ND,180.8,ND,ND,ND,NA,2009,October,Fall,4,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48",36,3.3,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,932,387,10,154.4,NA,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,Y,8-12 shoots per bundle on 1 m centers,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NHarborDrive_SDBay,NHarborDrive_SDBay_Plot1of1,NHarborDrive_SDBay_Plot1of1_48mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,San Diego Bay,NA,32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Use of ""bio-degradeable soft anchors to fasten bare-root units to the bottom.""",NA,Y,"Same bay, not more than 10% harvested",1028,591,ND,ND,113.6,71,ND,ND,NA,2009,October,Fall,4,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48",48,3.3,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,932,219,10,80.5,61.4,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,N,"Shoot densities in blue failed the non ref adjusted mitigation requirement, but met the ref adjusted one. Failed last areal coverage requirement. 8-12 shoots per bundle on 1 m centers",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
BAEPier_SDBAY,BAEPier_SDBAY_Onsite,BAEPier_SDBAY_Onsite_3mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,San Diego Bay,NA,32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,Sargassum,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,"""Anchored bare root transplants"", ""Biodegradable and pliable anchors.. a cotton collar and pliable paper anchor, 4-6 inches below the surface""",NA,Y,"Glorietta Beach donor bed, nearby. ",423,184,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,Didn't measure starting shoot densities of the ref meadow. ,2003,October,Fall,5,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",3,3.8,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,423,184,10,ND,ND,ND,ND,SCEMP,NA,NA,8-12 turions per m (1 m center),N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,Y,"Navanax, spotted bass, spiny lobster, round rays. Gracilaria, Sargassum",Spiny lobster,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
BAEPier_SDBAY,BAEPier_SDBAY_Onsite,BAEPier_SDBAY_Onsite_6mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,San Diego Bay,NA,32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,Sargassum,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,"""Anchored bare root transplants"", ""Biodegradable and pliable anchors.. a cotton collar and pliable paper anchor, 4-6 inches below the surface""",NA,Y,"Glorietta Beach donor bed, nearby. ",423,83,ND,ND,245,76,ND,ND,Didn't measure starting shoot densities of the ref meadow. ,2003,October,Fall,5,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",6,3.8,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,423,83,10,217,98,ND,ND,SCEMP,NA,NA,8-12 turions per m (1 m center),N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,Y,"Navanax, spotted bass, spiny lobster, round rays. Gracilaria, Sargassum",Spiny lobster,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
BAEPier_SDBAY,BAEPier_SDBAY_Onsite,BAEPier_SDBAY_Onsite_12mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,San Diego Bay,NA,32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,Sargassum,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,"""Anchored bare root transplants"", ""Biodegradable and pliable anchors.. a cotton collar and pliable paper anchor, 4-6 inches below the surface""",NA,Y,"Glorietta Beach donor bed, nearby. ",423,33,ND,ND,155,41,ND,ND,Didn't measure starting shoot densities of the ref meadow. ,2003,October,Fall,5,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",12,3.8,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,423,33,10,56,16,ND,ND,SCEMP,N,Y,"8-12 turions per m (1 m center). They added a second mitigation site after 3 years of this BAE project (the D st project). By using these two projects, they met the mitigation requirement, but the BAE project alone failed to reach mitigation targets",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,Y,"Navanax, spotted bass, spiny lobster, round rays. Gracilaria, Sargassum",Spiny lobster,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
BAEPier_SDBAY,BAEPier_SDBAY_Onsite,BAEPier_SDBAY_Onsite_24mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,San Diego Bay,NA,32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,Sargassum,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,"""Anchored bare root transplants"", ""Biodegradable and pliable anchors.. a cotton collar and pliable paper anchor, 4-6 inches below the surface""",NA,Y,"Glorietta Beach donor bed, nearby. ",423,151,ND,ND,158,45,ND,ND,Didn't measure starting shoot densities of the ref meadow. ,2003,October,Fall,5,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",24,3.8,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,423,151,10,83,31,ND,ND,SCEMP,N,N,"8-12 turions per m (1 m center). They added a second mitigation site after 3 years of this BAE project (the D st project). By using these two projects, they met the mitigation requirement, but the BAE project alone failed to reach mitigation targets",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,Y,"Navanax, spotted bass, spiny lobster, round rays. Gracilaria, Sargassum",Spiny lobster,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
BAEPier_SDBAY,BAEPier_SDBAY_Onsite,BAEPier_SDBAY_Onsite_36mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,San Diego Bay,NA,32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,Sargassum,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,"""Anchored bare root transplants"", ""Biodegradable and pliable anchors.. a cotton collar and pliable paper anchor, 4-6 inches below the surface""",NA,Y,"Glorietta Beach donor bed, nearby. ",423,510,ND,ND,282,68,ND,ND,Didn't measure starting shoot densities of the ref meadow. ,2003,October,Fall,5,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",36,3.8,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,423,510,10,240,109,ND,ND,SCEMP,N,Y,"8-12 turions per m (1 m center). They added a second mitigation site after 3 years of this BAE project (the D st project). By using these two projects, they met the mitigation requirement, but the BAE project alone failed to reach mitigation targets",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,Y,"Navanax, spotted bass, spiny lobster, round rays. Gracilaria, Sargassum",Spiny lobster,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
BAEPier_SDBAY,BAEPier_SDBAY_Onsite,BAEPier_SDBAY_Onsite_48mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,San Diego Bay,NA,32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,Sargassum,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,"""Anchored bare root transplants"", ""Biodegradable and pliable anchors.. a cotton collar and pliable paper anchor, 4-6 inches below the surface""",NA,Y,"Glorietta Beach donor bed, nearby. ",423,148,ND,ND,149,35,ND,ND,Didn't measure starting shoot densities of the ref meadow. ,2003,October,Fall,5,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",48,3.8,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,423,148,10,130,65,ND,ND,SCEMP,N,Y,"8-12 turions per m (1 m center). They added a second mitigation site after 3 years of this BAE project (the D st project). By using these two projects, they met the mitigation requirement, but the BAE project alone failed to reach mitigation targets",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,Y,"Navanax, spotted bass, spiny lobster, round rays. Gracilaria, Sargassum",Spiny lobster,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
BAEPier_SDBAY,BAEPier_SDBAY_Onsite,BAEPier_SDBAY_Onsite_60mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,San Diego Bay,NA,32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,Sargassum,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,"""Anchored bare root transplants"", ""Biodegradable and pliable anchors.. a cotton collar and pliable paper anchor, 4-6 inches below the surface""",NA,Y,"Glorietta Beach donor bed, nearby. ",423,219,ND,ND,181,41,ND,ND,Didn't measure starting shoot densities of the ref meadow. ,2003,October,Fall,5,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",60,3.8,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,423,219,10,164,28,ND,ND,SCEMP,N,N,"8-12 turions per m (1 m center). They added a second mitigation site after 3 years of this BAE project (the D st project). By using these two projects, they met the mitigation requirement, but the BAE project alone failed to reach mitigation targets",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,Y,"Navanax, spotted bass, spiny lobster, round rays. Gracilaria, Sargassum",Spiny lobster,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
BAEPier_SDBAY,BAEPier_SDBAY_Dst,BAEPier_SDBAY_Dst_6mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,San Diego Bay,NA,32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"""Anchored bare root transplants"", ""Biodegradable and pliable anchors.. a cotton collar and pliable paper anchor, 4-6 inches below the surface""",NA,Y,"Glorietta Beach donor bed, nearby. ",2100,2229,ND,ND,325,83,ND,ND,Didn't measure starting shoot densities of the ref meadow. ,2006,October,Fall,5,"6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",6,3.8,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,2883,9.5,10,286,224,ND,ND,SCEMP,NA,NA,8-12 turions per m (1 m center),N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,Y,"Navanax, spotted bass, spiny lobster, round rays. Gracilaria, Sargassum",Spiny lobster,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
BAEPier_SDBAY,BAEPier_SDBAY_Dst,BAEPier_SDBAY_Dst_12mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,San Diego Bay,NA,32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"""Anchored bare root transplants"", ""Biodegradable and pliable anchors.. a cotton collar and pliable paper anchor, 4-6 inches below the surface""",NA,Y,"Glorietta Beach donor bed, nearby. ",2100,1603,ND,ND,283,861,ND,ND,Didn't measure starting shoot densities of the ref meadow. ,2006,October,Fall,5,"6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",12,3.8,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,2883,61,10,216,113,ND,ND,SCEMP,N,Y,8-12 turions per m (1 m center),N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,Y,"Navanax, spotted bass, spiny lobster, round rays. Gracilaria, Sargassum",Spiny lobster,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
BAEPier_SDBAY,BAEPier_SDBAY_Dst,BAEPier_SDBAY_Dst_24mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,San Diego Bay,NA,32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"""Anchored bare root transplants"", ""Biodegradable and pliable anchors.. a cotton collar and pliable paper anchor, 4-6 inches below the surface""",NA,Y,"Glorietta Beach donor bed, nearby. ",2100,1423,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,Didn't measure starting shoot densities of the ref meadow. ,2006,October,Fall,5,"6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",24,3.8,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,2883,60,10,76,50,ND,ND,SCEMP,N,ND,8-12 turions per m (1 m center),N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,Y,"Navanax, spotted bass, spiny lobster, round rays. Gracilaria, Sargassum",Spiny lobster,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
BAEPier_SDBAY,BAEPier_SDBAY_Dst,BAEPier_SDBAY_Dst_36mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,San Diego Bay,NA,32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"""Anchored bare root transplants"", ""Biodegradable and pliable anchors.. a cotton collar and pliable paper anchor, 4-6 inches below the surface""",NA,Y,"Glorietta Beach donor bed, nearby. ",2100,1071,ND,ND,154,111,ND,ND,Didn't measure starting shoot densities of the ref meadow. ,2006,October,Fall,5,"6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",36,3.8,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,2883,128,10,216,153,ND,ND,SCEMP,N,Y,8-12 turions per m (1 m center),N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,Y,"Navanax, spotted bass, spiny lobster, round rays. Gracilaria, Sargassum",Spiny lobster,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
BAEPier_SDBAY,BAEPier_SDBAY_Dst,BAEPier_SDBAY_Dst_48mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,San Diego Bay,NA,32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"""Anchored bare root transplants"", ""Biodegradable and pliable anchors.. a cotton collar and pliable paper anchor, 4-6 inches below the surface""",NA,Y,"Glorietta Beach donor bed, nearby. ",2100,1435,ND,ND,115,59,ND,ND,Didn't measure starting shoot densities of the ref meadow. ,2006,October,Fall,5,"6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",48,3.8,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,2883,143,10,287,189,ND,ND,SCEMP,N,Y,8-12 turions per m (1 m center),N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,Y,"Navanax, spotted bass, spiny lobster, round rays. Gracilaria, Sargassum",Spiny lobster,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
BAEPier_SDBAY,BAEPier_SDBAY_Dst,BAEPier_SDBAY_Dst_60mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,San Diego Bay,NA,32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"""Anchored bare root transplants"", ""Biodegradable and pliable anchors.. a cotton collar and pliable paper anchor, 4-6 inches below the surface""",NA,Y,"Glorietta Beach donor bed, nearby. ",2100,2996,ND,ND,154,55,ND,ND,Didn't measure starting shoot densities of the ref meadow. ,2006,October,Fall,5,"6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",60,3.8,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,2883,805,10,162,84,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,Y,"8-12 turions per m (1 m center). At the very end up the project the area finally met the control corrected mitigation requirement, but only between the two sites (See BAE project notes above). ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,Y,"Navanax, spotted bass, spiny lobster, round rays. Gracilaria, Sargassum",Spiny lobster,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
BaysideDrive_Newport,BaysideDrive_Newport_Plot1of1,BaysideDrive_Newport_Plot1of1_3mo,Grey literature,MBC Environmental ,Newport Bay,NA,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"""Bundle and stick method""",ND,Y,ND,360,640,141,ND,123,ND,ND,ND,ND,1999,May,Spring,5,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",3,1.47,ND,-5 to -9 ft MLLW,ND,ND,ND,149,146,13,17,ND,ND,ND,SCEMP,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,Y,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
BaysideDrive_Newport,BaysideDrive_Newport_Plot1of1,BaysideDrive_Newport_Plot1of1_6mo,Grey literature,MBC Environmental ,Newport Bay,NA,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"""Bundle and stick method""",ND,Y,ND,360,1464,141,ND,186,ND,ND,ND,ND,1999,May,Spring,5,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",6,1.47,ND,-5 to -9 ft MLLW,ND,ND,ND,149,137,13,87,ND,ND,ND,SCEMP,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,Y,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
BaysideDrive_Newport,BaysideDrive_Newport_Plot1of1,BaysideDrive_Newport_Plot1of1_12mo,Grey literature,MBC Environmental ,Newport Bay,NA,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"""Bundle and stick method""",ND,Y,ND,360,1789,141,ND,180,ND,ND,ND,ND,1999,May,Spring,5,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",12,1.47,ND,-5 to -9 ft MLLW,ND,ND,ND,149,157,13,163,ND,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,Y,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,Y,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
BaysideDrive_Newport,BaysideDrive_Newport_Plot1of1,BaysideDrive_Newport_Plot1of1_24mo,Grey literature,MBC Environmental ,Newport Bay,NA,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"""Bundle and stick method""",ND,Y,ND,360,2200,141,ND,162,ND,ND,ND,ND,1999,May,Spring,5,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",24,1.47,ND,-5 to -9 ft MLLW,ND,ND,ND,149,149,13,208,ND,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,Y,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,Y,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
BaysideDrive_Newport,BaysideDrive_Newport_Plot1of1,BaysideDrive_Newport_Plot1of1_36mo,Grey literature,MBC Environmental ,Newport Bay,NA,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"""Bundle and stick method""",ND,Y,ND,360,2031,141,ND,242,ND,ND,ND,ND,1999,May,Spring,5,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",36,1.47,ND,-5 to -9 ft MLLW,ND,ND,ND,149,149,13,224,ND,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,Y,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,Y,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
BaysideDrive_Newport,BaysideDrive_Newport_Plot1of1,BaysideDrive_Newport_Plot1of1_48mo,Grey literature,MBC Environmental ,Newport Bay,NA,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"""Bundle and stick method""",ND,Y,ND,360,2321,141,ND,214,ND,ND,ND,ND,1999,May,Spring,5,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",48,1.47,ND,-5 to -9 ft MLLW,ND,ND,ND,149,149,13,210,ND,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,Y,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,Y,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
BaysideDrive_Newport,BaysideDrive_Newport_Plot1of1,BaysideDrive_Newport_Plot1of1_60mo,Grey literature,MBC Environmental ,Newport Bay,NA,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"""Bundle and stick method""",ND,Y,ND,360,2315,141,ND,176.5,ND,ND,ND,ND,1999,May,Spring,5,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",60,1.47,ND,-5 to -9 ft MLLW,ND,ND,ND,149,149,13,185,ND,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,Y,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,Y,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SanDieguitoLagoon,SanDieguitoLagoon_Plot1of1,SanDieguitoLagoon_Plot1of1_6mo,Grey literature,MBC Environmental ,San Dieguito Lagoon,NA,32.97,-117.27,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,"Essentially no info here, they just state that the bundeld shoots and transplanted them",ND,Y,ND,ND,ND,129,ND,212,ND,ND,ND,ND,2011,January ,Winter,3,"6, 12, 24, 36",6,1.66,ND,-2 to -3 ft MLLW,ND,ND,ND,305,105,12.5,6.7,ND,61,79,SCEMP,Y,Y,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,Y,"Halibut, spotted bass, siner perch, spotted turbot, Topsmelt, bay goby, round rays, inverts bubble snal, festive triton, california sea hare, navanax. ",Halibut,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SanDieguitoLagoon,SanDieguitoLagoon_Plot1of1,SanDieguitoLagoon_Plot1of1_12mo,Grey literature,MBC Environmental ,San Dieguito Lagoon,NA,32.97,-117.27,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,"Essentially no info here, they just state that the bundeld shoots and transplanted them",ND,Y,ND,ND,ND,129,ND,350,ND,ND,ND,ND,2011,January ,Winter,3,"6, 12, 24, 36",12,1.66,ND,-2 to -3 ft MLLW,ND,ND,ND,305,385,12.5,351.7,ND,61,82,SCEMP,Y,Y,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,Y,"Halibut, spotted bass, siner perch, spotted turbot, Topsmelt, bay goby, round rays, inverts bubble snal, festive triton, california sea hare, navanax. ",Halibut,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SanDieguitoLagoon,SanDieguitoLagoon_Plot1of1,SanDieguitoLagoon_Plot1of1_24mo,Grey literature,MBC Environmental ,San Dieguito Lagoon,NA,32.97,-117.27,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,"Essentially no info here, they just state that the bundeld shoots and transplanted them",ND,Y,ND,ND,ND,129,ND,229.2,ND,ND,ND,ND,2011,January ,Winter,3,"6, 12, 24, 36",24,1.66,ND,-2 to -3 ft MLLW,ND,ND,ND,305,910,12.5,147,ND,61,89,SCEMP,Y,Y,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,Y,"Halibut, spotted bass, siner perch, spotted turbot, Topsmelt, bay goby, round rays, inverts bubble snal, festive triton, california sea hare, navanax. ",Halibut,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SanDieguitoLagoon,SanDieguitoLagoon_Plot1of1,SanDieguitoLagoon_Plot1of1_36mo,Grey literature,MBC Environmental ,San Dieguito Lagoon,NA,32.97,-117.27,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,"Essentially no info here, they just state that the bundeld shoots and transplanted them",ND,Y,ND,ND,ND,129,ND,344.8,ND,ND,ND,ND,2011,January ,Winter,3,"6, 12, 24, 36",36,1.66,ND,-2 to -3 ft MLLW,ND,ND,ND,305,1385,12.5,321.6,ND,61,97.5,SCEMP,Y,Y,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,Y,"Halibut, spotted bass, siner perch, spotted turbot, Topsmelt, bay goby, round rays, inverts bubble snal, festive triton, california sea hare, navanax. ",Halibut,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
OrangeCoast,OrangeCoast_Plot1of1,OrangeCoast_Plot1of1_12mo,Grey literature,CRM,Newport Bay,NA,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"""anchor bundle method"" ",ND,Y,2 donor beds used from same bay ,ND,277,90.9,41.2,128.6,39.6,ND,ND,No area reported at time of tranplant for ref meadow,2010,September,Fall,3,"12, 24, 36",12,1.71,ND,-6 to -7 ft MLLW,ND,ND,2304,180,117.4,12,72.1,21.5,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,Y,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,Y,"Red algae, ectoproct, bubble snail, burrowing anemone, round rays, black perch, topsmelt",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
OrangeCoast,OrangeCoast_Plot1of1,OrangeCoast_Plot1of1_24mo,Grey literature,CRM,Newport Bay,NA,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"""anchor bundle method"" ",ND,Y,2 donor beds used from same bay ,ND,402.3,90.9,41.2,92.3,25.6,ND,ND,No area reported at time of tranplant for ref meadow,2010,September,Fall,3,"12, 24, 36",24,1.71,ND,-6 to -7 ft MLLW,ND,ND,2304,180,182.2,12,124.5,37.2,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,Y,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,Y,"Red algae, ectoproct, bubble snail, burrowing anemone, round rays, black perch, topsmelt",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
OrangeCoast,OrangeCoast_Plot1of1,OrangeCoast_Plot1of1_36mo,Grey literature,CRM,Newport Bay,NA,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"""anchor bundle method"" ",ND,Y,2 donor beds used from same bay ,ND,444.2,90.9,41.2,64.9,29,ND,ND,No area reported at time of tranplant for ref meadow,2010,September,Fall,3,"12, 24, 36",36,1.71,ND,-6 to -7 ft MLLW,ND,ND,2304,180,230.8,12,66.4,24.8,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,N,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,Y,"Red algae, ectoproct, bubble snail, burrowing anemone, round rays, black perch, topsmelt",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NationalCityWharf,NationalCityWharf_Plot1of1,NationalCityWharf_Plot1of1_3mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,San Diego Bay,National city wharf,32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,None Reported,"No methods info include, likely in previous reports that I cannot find/access","Only pulling data from the mitigation site, not the bank site ""The Mitigation Site served as mitigation for Project
impacts and the Mitigation Bank Site was created as an additional site to provide a future eelgrass
mitigation bank for the Port, as provided for under the SCEMP'
",Y,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,"Sadly, they do not report the ref meadow data from any previous surveys in the final 144 month survey, and I cannot find any other years surveys. ",2004,May,Spring,12,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144",3,1.3,ND,"""Investigations of the site following construction indicated that most of the borrow pit was filled to elevations of 6 feet MLLW, although there were several areas where the depths were greater than 9 feet MLLW.""",ND,ND,ND,12262,0,9,0,0,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NationalCityWharf,NationalCityWharf_Plot1of1,NationalCityWharf_Plot1of1_6mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,San Diego Bay,National city wharf,32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,None Reported,"No methods info include, likely in previous reports that I cannot find/access","Only pulling data from the mitigation site, not the bank site ""The Mitigation Site served as mitigation for Project
impacts and the Mitigation Bank Site was created as an additional site to provide a future eelgrass
mitigation bank for the Port, as provided for under the SCEMP'
",Y,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,"Sadly, they do not report the ref meadow data from any previous surveys in the final 144 month survey, and I cannot find any other years surveys. ",2004,May,Spring,12,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144",6,1.3,ND,"""Investigations of the site following construction indicated that most of the borrow pit was filled to elevations of 6 feet MLLW, although there were several areas where the depths were greater than 9 feet MLLW.""",ND,ND,ND,12262,0,9,0,0,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NationalCityWharf,NationalCityWharf_Plot1of1,NationalCityWharf_Plot1of1_12mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,San Diego Bay,National city wharf,32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,None Reported,"No methods info include, likely in previous reports that I cannot find/access","Only pulling data from the mitigation site, not the bank site ""The Mitigation Site served as mitigation for Project
impacts and the Mitigation Bank Site was created as an additional site to provide a future eelgrass
mitigation bank for the Port, as provided for under the SCEMP'
",Y,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,"Sadly, they do not report the ref meadow data from any previous surveys in the final 144 month survey, and I cannot find any other years surveys. ",2004,May,Spring,12,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144",12,1.3,ND,"""Investigations of the site following construction indicated that most of the borrow pit was filled to elevations of 6 feet MLLW, although there were several areas where the depths were greater than 9 feet MLLW.""",ND,ND,ND,12262,0,9,0,0,ND,ND,NA,N,ND,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NationalCityWharf,NationalCityWharf_Plot1of1,NationalCityWharf_Plot1of1_24mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,San Diego Bay,National city wharf,32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,None Reported,"No methods info include, likely in previous reports that I cannot find/access","Only pulling data from the mitigation site, not the bank site ""The Mitigation Site served as mitigation for Project
impacts and the Mitigation Bank Site was created as an additional site to provide a future eelgrass
mitigation bank for the Port, as provided for under the SCEMP'
",Y,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,"Sadly, they do not report the ref meadow data from any previous surveys in the final 144 month survey, and I cannot find any other years surveys. ",2004,May,Spring,12,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144",24,1.3,ND,"""Investigations of the site following construction indicated that most of the borrow pit was filled to elevations of 6 feet MLLW, although there were several areas where the depths were greater than 9 feet MLLW.""",ND,ND,ND,12262,14245,9,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,"Only met the 24 month markers becuase they added supplemental transplants (otherwise, it was no where close, the original transplants essentially all failed). ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NationalCityWharf,NationalCityWharf_Plot1of1,NationalCityWharf_Plot1of1_36mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,San Diego Bay,National city wharf,32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,None Reported,"No methods info include, likely in previous reports that I cannot find/access","Only pulling data from the mitigation site, not the bank site ""The Mitigation Site served as mitigation for Project
impacts and the Mitigation Bank Site was created as an additional site to provide a future eelgrass
mitigation bank for the Port, as provided for under the SCEMP'
",Y,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,"Sadly, they do not report the ref meadow data from any previous surveys in the final 144 month survey, and I cannot find any other years surveys. ",2004,May,Spring,12,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144",36,1.3,ND,"""Investigations of the site following construction indicated that most of the borrow pit was filled to elevations of 6 feet MLLW, although there were several areas where the depths were greater than 9 feet MLLW.""",ND,ND,ND,12262,0,9,0,0,ND,ND,NA,N,ND,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NationalCityWharf,NationalCityWharf_Plot1of1,NationalCityWharf_Plot1of1_48mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,San Diego Bay,National city wharf,32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,None Reported,"No methods info include, likely in previous reports that I cannot find/access","Only pulling data from the mitigation site, not the bank site ""The Mitigation Site served as mitigation for Project
impacts and the Mitigation Bank Site was created as an additional site to provide a future eelgrass
mitigation bank for the Port, as provided for under the SCEMP'
",Y,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,"Sadly, they do not report the ref meadow data from any previous surveys in the final 144 month survey, and I cannot find any other years surveys. ",2004,May,Spring,12,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144",48,1.3,ND,"""Investigations of the site following construction indicated that most of the borrow pit was filled to elevations of 6 feet MLLW, although there were several areas where the depths were greater than 9 feet MLLW.""",ND,ND,ND,12262,248,9,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,"Only met the 24 month markers becuase they added supplemental transplants (otherwise, it was no where close, the original transplants essentially all failed). ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NationalCityWharf,NationalCityWharf_Plot1of1,NationalCityWharf_Plot1of1_60mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,San Diego Bay,National city wharf,32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,None Reported,"No methods info include, likely in previous reports that I cannot find/access","Only pulling data from the mitigation site, not the bank site ""The Mitigation Site served as mitigation for Project
impacts and the Mitigation Bank Site was created as an additional site to provide a future eelgrass
mitigation bank for the Port, as provided for under the SCEMP'
",Y,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,"Sadly, they do not report the ref meadow data from any previous surveys in the final 144 month survey, and I cannot find any other years surveys. ",2004,May,Spring,12,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144",60,1.3,ND,"""Investigations of the site following construction indicated that most of the borrow pit was filled to elevations of 6 feet MLLW, although there were several areas where the depths were greater than 9 feet MLLW.""",ND,ND,ND,12262,17,9,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NationalCityWharf,NationalCityWharf_Plot1of1,NationalCityWharf_Plot1of1_72mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,San Diego Bay,National city wharf,32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,None Reported,"No methods info include, likely in previous reports that I cannot find/access","Only pulling data from the mitigation site, not the bank site ""The Mitigation Site served as mitigation for Project
impacts and the Mitigation Bank Site was created as an additional site to provide a future eelgrass
mitigation bank for the Port, as provided for under the SCEMP'
",Y,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,"Sadly, they do not report the ref meadow data from any previous surveys in the final 144 month survey, and I cannot find any other years surveys. ",2004,May,Spring,12,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144",72,1.3,ND,"""Investigations of the site following construction indicated that most of the borrow pit was filled to elevations of 6 feet MLLW, although there were several areas where the depths were greater than 9 feet MLLW.""",ND,ND,ND,12262,385,9,84,33,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NationalCityWharf,NationalCityWharf_Plot1of1,NationalCityWharf_Plot1of1_84mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,San Diego Bay,National city wharf,32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,None Reported,"No methods info include, likely in previous reports that I cannot find/access","Only pulling data from the mitigation site, not the bank site ""The Mitigation Site served as mitigation for Project
impacts and the Mitigation Bank Site was created as an additional site to provide a future eelgrass
mitigation bank for the Port, as provided for under the SCEMP'
",Y,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,"Sadly, they do not report the ref meadow data from any previous surveys in the final 144 month survey, and I cannot find any other years surveys. ",2004,May,Spring,12,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144",84,1.3,ND,"""Investigations of the site following construction indicated that most of the borrow pit was filled to elevations of 6 feet MLLW, although there were several areas where the depths were greater than 9 feet MLLW.""",ND,ND,ND,12262,283,9,84,37,ND,ND,NA,N,ND,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NationalCityWharf,NationalCityWharf_Plot1of1,NationalCityWharf_Plot1of1_96mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,San Diego Bay,National city wharf,32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,None Reported,"No methods info include, likely in previous reports that I cannot find/access","Only pulling data from the mitigation site, not the bank site ""The Mitigation Site served as mitigation for Project
impacts and the Mitigation Bank Site was created as an additional site to provide a future eelgrass
mitigation bank for the Port, as provided for under the SCEMP'
",Y,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,"Sadly, they do not report the ref meadow data from any previous surveys in the final 144 month survey, and I cannot find any other years surveys. ",2004,May,Spring,12,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144",96,1.3,ND,"""Investigations of the site following construction indicated that most of the borrow pit was filled to elevations of 6 feet MLLW, although there were several areas where the depths were greater than 9 feet MLLW.""",ND,ND,ND,12262,4034,9,65,30,ND,ND,NA,N,ND,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NationalCityWharf,NationalCityWharf_Plot1of1,NationalCityWharf_Plot1of1_108mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,San Diego Bay,National city wharf,32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,None Reported,"No methods info include, likely in previous reports that I cannot find/access","Only pulling data from the mitigation site, not the bank site ""The Mitigation Site served as mitigation for Project impacts and the Mitigation Bank Site was created as an additional site to provide a future eelgrass mitigation bank for the Port, as provided for under the SCEMP'",Y,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,"Sadly, they do not report the ref meadow data from any previous surveys in the final 144 month survey, and I cannot find any other years surveys. ",2004,May,Spring,12,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144",108,1.3,ND,"""Investigations of the site following construction indicated that most of the borrow pit was filled to elevations of 6 feet MLLW, although there were several areas where the depths were greater than 9 feet MLLW.""",ND,ND,ND,12262,3290,9,108,46,ND,ND,NA,N,ND,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NationalCityWharf,NationalCityWharf_Plot1of1,NationalCityWharf_Plot1of1_120mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,San Diego Bay,National city wharf,32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,None Reported,"No methods info include, likely in previous reports that I cannot find/access","Only pulling data from the mitigation site, not the bank site ""The Mitigation Site served as mitigation for Project
impacts and the Mitigation Bank Site was created as an additional site to provide a future eelgrass
mitigation bank for the Port, as provided for under the SCEMP'
",Y,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,"Sadly, they do not report the ref meadow data from any previous surveys in the final 144 month survey, and I cannot find any other years surveys. ",2004,May,Spring,12,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144",120,1.3,ND,"""Investigations of the site following construction indicated that most of the borrow pit was filled to elevations of 6 feet MLLW, although there were several areas where the depths were greater than 9 feet MLLW.""",ND,ND,ND,12262,6775,9,99,26,ND,ND,NA,N,ND,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NationalCityWharf,NationalCityWharf_Plot1of1,NationalCityWharf_Plot1of1_132mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,San Diego Bay,National city wharf,32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,None Reported,"No methods info include, likely in previous reports that I cannot find/access","Only pulling data from the mitigation site, not the bank site ""The Mitigation Site served as mitigation for Project
impacts and the Mitigation Bank Site was created as an additional site to provide a future eelgrass
mitigation bank for the Port, as provided for under the SCEMP'
",Y,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,"Sadly, they do not report the ref meadow data from any previous surveys in the final 144 month survey, and I cannot find any other years surveys. ",2004,May,Spring,12,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144",132,1.3,ND,"""Investigations of the site following construction indicated that most of the borrow pit was filled to elevations of 6 feet MLLW, although there were several areas where the depths were greater than 9 feet MLLW.""",ND,ND,ND,12262,10424,9,172,52.1,ND,ND,NA,N,ND,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NationalCityWharf,NationalCityWharf_Plot1of1,NationalCityWharf_Plot1of1_144mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,San Diego Bay,National city wharf,32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,None Reported,"No methods info include, likely in previous reports that I cannot find/access","Only pulling data from the mitigation site, not the bank site ""The Mitigation Site served as mitigation for Project
impacts and the Mitigation Bank Site was created as an additional site to provide a future eelgrass
mitigation bank for the Port, as provided for under the SCEMP'
",Y,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,139.2,50.4,ND,ND,"Sadly, they do not report the ref meadow data from any previous surveys in the final 144 month survey, and I cannot find any other years surveys. ",2004,May,Spring,12,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144",144,1.3,ND,"""Investigations of the site following construction indicated that most of the borrow pit was filled to elevations of 6 feet MLLW, although there were several areas where the depths were greater than 9 feet MLLW.""",ND,ND,ND,12262,12248,9,103.2,44.2,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
LowerNewportBay,LowerNewportBay_Plot1of1,LowerNewportBay_Plot1of1_3mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,Newport Bay,NA,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,The transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom.,NA,Y,"More than one donor bed, same bay ",17285,17593,ND,ND,100.3,ND,ND,ND,NA,2012,June,Summer,1,"3, 6, 12",3,7.65,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,9914.8,362,6,67,ND,ND,ND,SCEMP,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
LowerNewportBay,LowerNewportBay_Plot1of1,LowerNewportBay_Plot1of1_6mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,Newport Bay,NA,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,The transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom.,NA,Y,"More than one donor bed, same bay ",17285,15823,ND,ND,149.6,ND,ND,ND,NA,2012,June,Summer,1,"3, 6, 12",6,7.65,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,9914.8,3035,6,108.8,49.8,ND,ND,SCEMP,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
LowerNewportBay,LowerNewportBay_Plot1of1,LowerNewportBay_Plot1of1_12mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,Newport Bay,NA,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,The transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom.,NA,Y,"More than one donor bed, same bay ",17285,17252,ND,ND,204.4,98.5,ND,ND,NA,2012,June,Summer,1,"3, 6, 12",12,7.65,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,9914.8,7033,6,149.6,65.4,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,Y,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
LeMeridian,LeMeridian_Plot1of1,LeMeridian_Plot1of1_3mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,San Diego Bay,NA,32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,Sargassum,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,"Essentially no info on how the transplants were done, but they were bundles. ",NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,No reference meadow,1990,May,Spring,5,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",3,ND,-6.5 to -7 ft MLLW,ND,ND,ND,ND,625.4,612.5,41.6,51.3,2.2,ND,ND,None,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,Y,"""Gobies, bubble smail, round rays were most common"". Also, sand bass, diamond turbot, California Halibut, opaleye, kelp bass, spiny lobster, octopus. Croaker, surfperch, scorpionfish.","Spiny lobster, CA halibut",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
LeMeridian,LeMeridian_Plot1of1,LeMeridian_Plot1of1_6mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,San Diego Bay,NA,32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,Sargassum,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,"Essentially no info on how the transplants were done, but they were bundles. ",NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,No reference meadow,1990,May,Spring,5,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",6,ND,-6.5 to -7 ft MLLW,ND,ND,ND,ND,625.4,ND,41.6,28.4,22.3,ND,ND,None,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,Y,"""Gobies, bubble smail, round rays were most common"". Also, sand bass, diamond turbot, California Halibut, opaleye, kelp bass, spiny lobster, octopus. Croaker, surfperch, scorpionfish.","Spiny lobster, CA halibut",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
LeMeridian,LeMeridian_Plot1of1,LeMeridian_Plot1of1_12mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,San Diego Bay,NA,32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,Sargassum,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,"Essentially no info on how the transplants were done, but they were bundles. ",NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,No reference meadow,1990,May,Spring,5,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",12,ND,-6.5 to -7 ft MLLW,ND,ND,ND,ND,625.4,572.3,41.6,357.5,9.7,ND,ND,None,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,Y,"""Gobies, bubble smail, round rays were most common"". Also, sand bass, diamond turbot, California Halibut, opaleye, kelp bass, spiny lobster, octopus. Croaker, surfperch, scorpionfish.","Spiny lobster, CA halibut",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
LeMeridian,LeMeridian_Plot1of1,LeMeridian_Plot1of1_24mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,San Diego Bay,NA,32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,Sargassum,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,"Essentially no info on how the transplants were done, but they were bundles. ",NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,No reference meadow,1990,May,Spring,5,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",24,ND,-6.5 to -7 ft MLLW,ND,ND,ND,ND,625.4,625.2,41.6,397.7,9.6,ND,ND,None,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,Y,"""Gobies, bubble smail, round rays were most common"". Also, sand bass, diamond turbot, California Halibut, opaleye, kelp bass, spiny lobster, octopus. Croaker, surfperch, scorpionfish.","Spiny lobster, CA halibut",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
LeMeridian,LeMeridian_Plot1of1,LeMeridian_Plot1of1_36mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,San Diego Bay,NA,32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,Sargassum,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,"Essentially no info on how the transplants were done, but they were bundles. ",NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,No reference meadow,1990,May,Spring,5,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",42,ND,-6.5 to -7 ft MLLW,ND,ND,ND,ND,625.4,431.1,41.6,194.2,4.8,ND,ND,None,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,Y,"""Gobies, bubble smail, round rays were most common"". Also, sand bass, diamond turbot, California Halibut, opaleye, kelp bass, spiny lobster, octopus. Croaker, surfperch, scorpionfish.","Spiny lobster, CA halibut",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
LeMeridian,LeMeridian_Plot1of1,LeMeridian_Plot1of1_48mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,San Diego Bay,NA,32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,Sargassum,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,"Essentially no info on how the transplants were done, but they were bundles. ",NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,No reference meadow,1990,May,Spring,5,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",48,ND,-6.5 to -7 ft MLLW,ND,ND,ND,ND,625.4,522.5,41.6,179.2,142.7,ND,ND,None,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,Y,"""Gobies, bubble smail, round rays were most common"". Also, sand bass, diamond turbot, California Halibut, opaleye, kelp bass, spiny lobster, octopus. Croaker, surfperch, scorpionfish.","Spiny lobster, CA halibut",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
LeMeridian,LeMeridian_Plot1of1,LeMeridian_Plot1of1_60mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,San Diego Bay,NA,32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,Sargassum,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,"Essentially no info on how the transplants were done, but they were bundles. ",NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,No reference meadow,1990,May,Spring,5,"3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",60,ND,-6.5 to -7 ft MLLW,ND,ND,ND,ND,625.4,519,41.6,201.6,46.6,ND,ND,None,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,Y,"""Gobies, bubble smail, round rays were most common"". Also, sand bass, diamond turbot, California Halibut, opaleye, kelp bass, spiny lobster, octopus. Croaker, surfperch, scorpionfish.","Spiny lobster, CA halibut",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
EmbarcaderoMarina,EmbarcaderoMarina_Plot1of1,EmbarcaderoMarina_Plot1of1_3mo,Grey literature,MBC Environmental,San Diego Bay,NA,32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,Japanese mussels,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,"Essentially no info on how the transplants were done, but they were bundles. ",NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,"Unclear data in table on ref bed % cover, unable to interpret. Similarly poor data reporting for densities (no date so unable to tell), and no areal data. ",1991,May,Spring,2,"3, 12, 24",3,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,540.7,491.6,41.9,34.4,ND,ND,ND,None,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
EmbarcaderoMarina,EmbarcaderoMarina_Plot1of1,EmbarcaderoMarina_Plot1of1_12mo,Grey literature,MBC Environmental,San Diego Bay,NA,32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,Japanese mussels,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,"Essentially no info on how the transplants were done, but they were bundles. ",NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,391,ND,ND,ND,"Unclear data in table on ref bed % cover, unable to interpret. Similarly poor data reporting for densities (no date so unable to tell), and no areal data. ",1991,May,Spring,2,"3, 12, 24",12,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,540.7,113.2,41.9,204.4,ND,ND,ND,None,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
EmbarcaderoMarina,EmbarcaderoMarina_Plot1of1,EmbarcaderoMarina_Plot1of1_24mo,Grey literature,MBC Environmental,San Diego Bay,NA,32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,Japanese mussels,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,"Essentially no info on how the transplants were done, but they were bundles. ",NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,271,ND,ND,ND,"Unclear data in table on ref bed % cover, unable to interpret. Similarly poor data reporting for densities (no date so unable to tell), and no areal data. ",1991,May,Spring,2,"3, 12, 24",24,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,540.7,157.4,41.9,312,ND,ND,ND,None,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NB_CoastGuard_Merkel,NB_CoastGuard_Merkel_Plot1of1,NB_CoastGuard_Merkel_Plot1of1_6mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,Newport Bay,NA,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Anchors were 'soft biodegradable pliabel anchors of a cotton collar and pliable paper anchor""",NA,Y,ND,90,90,ND,ND,169.6,42.1,ND,ND,NA,2002,February,Winter,5,"0, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",6,12.4,-11 to -14 ft MLLW,-11 to -14 ft MLLW,ND,ND,ND,452,278,10,100.8,41.2,ND,ND,SCEMP,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NB_CoastGuard_Merkel,NB_CoastGuard_Merkel_Plot1of1,NB_CoastGuard_Merkel_Plot1of1_12mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,Newport Bay,NA,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Anchors were 'soft biodegradable pliabel anchors of a cotton collar and pliable paper anchor""",NA,Y,ND,90,90,ND,ND,205.6,63.6,ND,ND,NA,2002,February,Winter,5,"0, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",12,12.4,-11 to -14 ft MLLW,-11 to -14 ft MLLW,ND,ND,ND,452,247,10,131.2,38.4,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NB_CoastGuard_Merkel,NB_CoastGuard_Merkel_Plot1of1,NB_CoastGuard_Merkel_Plot1of1_24mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,Newport Bay,NA,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Anchors were 'soft biodegradable pliabel anchors of a cotton collar and pliable paper anchor""",NA,Y,ND,90,90,ND,ND,158.7,41.2,ND,ND,NA,2002,February,Winter,5,"0, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",24,12.4,-11 to -14 ft MLLW,-11 to -14 ft MLLW,ND,ND,ND,452,191,10,73.3,39.5,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,Y,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NB_CoastGuard_Merkel,NB_CoastGuard_Merkel_Plot1of1,NB_CoastGuard_Merkel_Plot1of1_36mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,Newport Bay,NA,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Anchors were 'soft biodegradable pliabel anchors of a cotton collar and pliable paper anchor""",NA,Y,ND,90,63,ND,ND,66,44,ND,ND,NA,2002,February,Winter,5,"0, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",36,12.4,-11 to -14 ft MLLW,-11 to -14 ft MLLW,ND,ND,ND,452,174,10,48,36,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,Y,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NB_CoastGuard_Merkel,NB_CoastGuard_Merkel_Plot1of1,NB_CoastGuard_Merkel_Plot1of1_48mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,Newport Bay,NA,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Anchors were 'soft biodegradable pliabel anchors of a cotton collar and pliable paper anchor""",NA,Y,ND,90,87,ND,ND,107,49,ND,ND,NA,2002,February,Winter,5,"0, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",48,12.4,-11 to -14 ft MLLW,-11 to -14 ft MLLW,ND,ND,ND,452,117,10,102,64,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,Y,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
NB_CoastGuard_Merkel,NB_CoastGuard_Merkel_Plot1of1,NB_CoastGuard_Merkel_Plot1of1_60mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,Newport Bay,NA,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Anchors were 'soft biodegradable pliabel anchors of a cotton collar and pliable paper anchor""",NA,Y,ND,90,90,ND,ND,108,34,ND,ND,NA,2002,February,Winter,5,"0, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",60,12.4,-11 to -14 ft MLLW,-11 to -14 ft MLLW,ND,ND,ND,452,103,10,68,27,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,Y,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
LNB_LindaIsle_Merkel,LNB_LindaIsle_Merkel_Plot1of1,LNB_LindaIsle_Merkel_Plot1of1_6mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,Newport Bay,Lower Newport Bay just southwest of Corona del Mar.,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Use of ""bio-degradeable soft anchors to fasten bare-root units to the bottom.""",NA,Y,"""Eelgrass was salvaged from natural donor beds within the Corona del Mar dredge site and along the dredged bank of the excavation, where eelgrass was being undermined by bank relaxation (Figure 1).""",15823,16349,149.6,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,2012,October,Fall,1,"0, 6, 12",6,2.34,ND,ND,ND,ND,37840,5544.193,1457,8,108,49.8,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,Y,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
LNB_LindaIsle_Merkel,LNB_LindaIsle_Merkel_Plot1of1,LNB_LindaIsle_Merkel_Plot1of1_12mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,Newport Bay,Lower Newport Bay just southwest of Corona del Mar.,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Use of ""bio-degradeable soft anchors to fasten bare-root units to the bottom.""",NA,Y,"""Eelgrass was salvaged from natural donor beds within the Corona del Mar dredge site and along the dredged bank of the excavation, where eelgrass was being undermined by bank relaxation (Figure 1).""",15823,17252,149.6,ND,204.4,98.5,ND,ND,NA,2012,October,Fall,1,"0, 6, 12",12,2.34,ND,ND,ND,ND,37840,5544.193,3128,8,129.6,98.5,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,Y,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MB_VenturaCove_Merkel,MB_VenturaCove_Merkel_Plot1of1,MB_VenturaCove_Merkel_Plot1of1_3mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,Mission Bay,"Ventura Cove in Mission Bay Park ""west of Vacation Isle between Bahia Point and Ventura Point, east of the Bahia Hotel (Figure 1).",32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Use of ""bio-degradeable soft anchors to fasten bare-root units to the bottom substrate.""",NA,Y,"Eelgrass was harvested (salvaged by hand) from existing donor beds located at North Cove on Vacation Isle, with not more than 20 percent of any bed being harvested.",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,"Almost not info provided on the ref bed, although they say there is one?",1996,June,Summer,5,"0, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",3,1.58,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,6394,6313.1,10,ND,ND,ND,ND,SCEMP,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MB_VenturaCove_Merkel,MB_VenturaCove_Merkel_Plot1of1,MB_VenturaCove_Merkel_Plot1of1_6mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,Mission Bay,"Ventura Cove in Mission Bay Park ""west of Vacation Isle between Bahia Point and Ventura Point, east of the Bahia Hotel (Figure 1).",32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Use of ""bio-degradeable soft anchors to fasten bare-root units to the bottom substrate.""",NA,Y,"Eelgrass was harvested (salvaged by hand) from existing donor beds located at North Cove on Vacation Isle, with not more than 20 percent of any bed being harvested.",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,"Almost not info provided on the ref bed, although they say there is one?",1996,June,Summer,5,"0, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",6,1.58,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,6394,5665.6,10,241.6,62.9,ND,ND,SCEMP,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MB_VenturaCove_Merkel,MB_VenturaCove_Merkel_Plot1of1,MB_VenturaCove_Merkel_Plot1of1_12mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,Mission Bay,"Ventura Cove in Mission Bay Park ""west of Vacation Isle between Bahia Point and Ventura Point, east of the Bahia Hotel (Figure 1).",32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Use of ""bio-degradeable soft anchors to fasten bare-root units to the bottom substrate.""",NA,Y,"Eelgrass was harvested (salvaged by hand) from existing donor beds located at North Cove on Vacation Isle, with not more than 20 percent of any bed being harvested.",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,"Almost not info provided on the ref bed, although they say there is one?",1996,June,Summer,5,"0, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",12,1.58,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,6394,5625.1,10,188.8,41.2,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,Y,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MB_VenturaCove_Merkel,MB_VenturaCove_Merkel_Plot1of1,MB_VenturaCove_Merkel_Plot1of1_24mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,Mission Bay,"Ventura Cove in Mission Bay Park ""west of Vacation Isle between Bahia Point and Ventura Point, east of the Bahia Hotel (Figure 1).",32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Use of ""bio-degradeable soft anchors to fasten bare-root units to the bottom substrate.""",NA,Y,"Eelgrass was harvested (salvaged by hand) from existing donor beds located at North Cove on Vacation Isle, with not more than 20 percent of any bed being harvested.",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,"Almost not info provided on the ref bed, although they say there is one?",1996,June,Summer,5,"0, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",24,1.58,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,6394,1902,10,105.6,59,ND,ND,SCEMP,N,Y,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MB_VenturaCove_Merkel,MB_VenturaCove_Merkel_Plot1of1,MB_VenturaCove_Merkel_Plot1of1_36mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,Mission Bay,"Ventura Cove in Mission Bay Park ""west of Vacation Isle between Bahia Point and Ventura Point, east of the Bahia Hotel (Figure 1).",32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Use of ""bio-degradeable soft anchors to fasten bare-root units to the bottom substrate.""",NA,Y,"Eelgrass was harvested (salvaged by hand) from existing donor beds located at North Cove on Vacation Isle, with not more than 20 percent of any bed being harvested.",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,"Almost not info provided on the ref bed, although they say there is one?",1996,June,Summer,5,"0, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",36,1.58,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,6394,4330.1,10,250,ND,ND,ND,SCEMP,N,Y,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MB_VenturaCove_Merkel,MB_VenturaCove_Merkel_Plot1of1,MB_VenturaCove_Merkel_Plot1of1_48mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,Mission Bay,"Ventura Cove in Mission Bay Park ""west of Vacation Isle between Bahia Point and Ventura Point, east of the Bahia Hotel (Figure 1).",32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Use of ""bio-degradeable soft anchors to fasten bare-root units to the bottom substrate.""",NA,Y,"Eelgrass was harvested (salvaged by hand) from existing donor beds located at North Cove on Vacation Isle, with not more than 20 percent of any bed being harvested.",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,"Almost not info provided on the ref bed, although they say there is one?",1996,June,Summer,5,"0, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",48,1.58,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,6394,4087.3,10,224,ND,ND,ND,SCEMP,N,Y,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MB_VenturaCove_Merkel,MB_VenturaCove_Merkel_Plot1of1,MB_VenturaCove_Merkel_Plot1of1_60mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,Mission Bay,"Ventura Cove in Mission Bay Park ""west of Vacation Isle between Bahia Point and Ventura Point, east of the Bahia Hotel (Figure 1).",32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Use of ""bio-degradeable soft anchors to fasten bare-root units to the bottom substrate.""",NA,Y,"Eelgrass was harvested (salvaged by hand) from existing donor beds located at North Cove on Vacation Isle, with not more than 20 percent of any bed being harvested.",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,"Almost not info provided on the ref bed, although they say there is one?",1996,June,Summer,5,"0, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",60,1.58,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,6394,4249,10,382,148.9,ND,ND,SCEMP,N,Y,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
CampbellShipyard_Merkel,CampbellShipyard_Merkel_Plot1of1,CampbellShipyard_Merkel_Plot1of1_3mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,San Diego Bay,Campbell Shipyard,32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Eelgrass was planted using an anchored bare-root restoration technique with planting bundles placed
on 1-meter centers. Bare-root bundles were created by sorting, trimming, and grouping 5-8 turions
of eelgrass collected from donor eelgrass beds. Bundles were then tied with degradable twine and
attached to a degradable paper stick that served as an anchor during the first few weeks of root
growth.; depth was made more suitable by placement of a ""habitat cap""",NA,Y,ND,6596,5585,ND,ND,342,ND,ND,ND,The only percentages I found were percentages of epiphytes,2008,March,Spring,5,"0, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",3,4.3,-5,"""between Ð4-ft MLLW and Ð6-ft MLLW"" ",ND,ND,42900,6395,4633,5,8,ND,ND,ND,CEMP defined criteria ,Y,NA,8 density for restoration site is approximated; total number of shoots transplanted ranges from 33000 to 52800,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Y, epiphytic load (but not every monitoring time)","epiphytic load near outer, western end of site was approx. 30%",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
CampbellShipyard_Merkel,CampbellShipyard_Merkel_Plot1of1,CampbellShipyard_Merkel_Plot1of1_6mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,San Diego Bay,Campbell Shipyard,32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Eelgrass was planted using an anchored bare-root restoration technique with planting bundles placed on 1-meter centers. Bare-root bundles were created by sorting, trimming, and grouping 5-8 turions of eelgrass collected from donor eelgrass beds. Bundles were then tied with degradable twine and attached to a degradable paper stick that served as an anchor during the first few weeks of root growth.; depth was made more suitable by placement of a ""habitat cap""",NA,Y,ND,6596,4006,ND,ND,230,ND,ND,ND,The only percentages I found were percentages of epiphytes,2008,March,Spring,5,"0, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",6,4.3,-5,"""between Ð4-ft MLLW and Ð6-ft MLLW"" ",ND,ND,42900,6395,5544,5,108,ND,ND,ND,CEMP defined criteria ,Y,NA,total number of shoots transplanted ranges from 33000 to 52800,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Y, epiphytic load (but not every monitoring time)","epiphytic load near outer, western end of site was approx. 30%",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
CampbellShipyard_Merkel,CampbellShipyard_Merkel_Plot1of1,CampbellShipyard_Merkel_Plot1of1_12mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,San Diego Bay,Campbell Shipyard,32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Eelgrass was planted using an anchored bare-root restoration technique with planting bundles placed on 1-meter centers. Bare-root bundles were created by sorting, trimming, and grouping 5-8 turions of eelgrass collected from donor eelgrass beds. Bundles were then tied with degradable twine and attached to a degradable paper stick that served as an anchor during the first few weeks of root growth.; depth was made more suitable by placement of a ""habitat cap""",NA,Y,ND,6596,4816,ND,ND,277,ND,ND,ND,The only percentages I found were percentages of epiphytes,2008,March,Spring,5,"0, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",12,4.3,-5,"""between Ð4-ft MLLW and Ð6-ft MLLW"" ",ND,ND,42900,6395,3122,5,156,ND,ND,ND,CEMP defined criteria ,Y,Y,total number of shoots transplanted ranges from 33000 to 52800,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Y, epiphytic load (but not every monitoring time)","epiphytic load near outer, western end of site was approx. 30%",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
CampbellShipyard_Merkel,CampbellShipyard_Merkel_Plot1of1,CampbellShipyard_Merkel_Plot1of1_24mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,San Diego Bay,Campbell Shipyard,32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Eelgrass was planted using an anchored bare-root restoration technique with planting bundles placed on 1-meter centers. Bare-root bundles were created by sorting, trimming, and grouping 5-8 turions of eelgrass collected from donor eelgrass beds. Bundles were then tied with degradable twine and attached to a degradable paper stick that served as an anchor during the first few weeks of root growth.; depth was made more suitable by placement of a ""habitat cap""",NA,Y,ND,6596,4824,ND,ND,102,ND,ND,ND,The only percentages I found were percentages of epiphytes,2008,March,Spring,5,"0, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",24,4.3,-5,"""between Ð4-ft MLLW and Ð6-ft MLLW"" ",ND,ND,42900,6395,1885,5,118,ND,ND,ND,CEMP defined criteria ,Y,Y,total number of shoots transplanted ranges from 33000 to 52800,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Y, epiphytic load (but not every monitoring time)","epiphytic load near outer, western end of site was approx. 30%",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
CampbellShipyard_Merkel,CampbellShipyard_Merkel_Plot1of1,CampbellShipyard_Merkel_Plot1of1_36mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,San Diego Bay,Campbell Shipyard,32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Eelgrass was planted using an anchored bare-root restoration technique with planting bundles placed on 1-meter centers. Bare-root bundles were created by sorting, trimming, and grouping 5-8 turions of eelgrass collected from donor eelgrass beds. Bundles were then tied with degradable twine and attached to a degradable paper stick that served as an anchor during the first few weeks of root growth.; depth was made more suitable by placement of a ""habitat cap""",NA,Y,ND,6596,5317,ND,ND,306,ND,ND,ND,The only percentages I found were percentages of epiphytes,2008,March,Spring,5,"0, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",36,4.3,-5,"""between Ð4-ft MLLW and Ð6-ft MLLW"" ",ND,ND,42900,6395,2803,5,181,ND,ND,ND,CEMP defined criteria ,Y,N,total number of shoots transplanted ranges from 33000 to 52800,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Y, epiphytic load (but not every monitoring time)","epiphytic load near outer, western end of site was approx. 30%",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
CampbellShipyard_Merkel,CampbellShipyard_Merkel_Plot1of1,CampbellShipyard_Merkel_Plot1of1_48mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,San Diego Bay,Campbell Shipyard,32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Eelgrass was planted using an anchored bare-root restoration technique with planting bundles placed on 1-meter centers. Bare-root bundles were created by sorting, trimming, and grouping 5-8 turions of eelgrass collected from donor eelgrass beds. Bundles were then tied with degradable twine and attached to a degradable paper stick that served as an anchor during the first few weeks of root growth.; depth was made more suitable by placement of a ""habitat cap""",NA,Y,ND,6596,6039,ND,ND,203,ND,ND,ND,The only percentages I found were percentages of epiphytes,2008,March,Spring,5,"0, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",48,4.3,-5,"""between Ð4-ft MLLW and Ð6-ft MLLW"" ",ND,ND,42900,6395,2325,5,107,ND,ND,ND,CEMP defined criteria ,Y,N,total number of shoots transplanted ranges from 33000 to 52800,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Y, epiphytic load (but not every monitoring time)","epiphytic load near outer, western end of site was approx. 30%",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
CampbellShipyard_Merkel,CampbellShipyard_Merkel_Plot1of1,CampbellShipyard_Merkel_Plot1of1_60mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Associates,San Diego Bay,Campbell Shipyard,32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Eelgrass was planted using an anchored bare-root restoration technique with planting bundles placed on 1-meter centers. Bare-root bundles were created by sorting, trimming, and grouping 5-8 turions of eelgrass collected from donor eelgrass beds. Bundles were then tied with degradable twine and attached to a degradable paper stick that served as an anchor during the first few weeks of root growth.; depth was made more suitable by placement of a ""habitat cap""",NA,Y,ND,6596,3877,ND,ND,151,71.1,ND,ND,The only percentages I found were percentages of epiphytes,2008,March,Spring,5,"0, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",60,4.3,-5,"""between Ð4-ft MLLW and Ð6-ft MLLW"" ",ND,ND,42900,6395,2121,5,183.2,82.8,ND,ND,CEMP defined criteria ,Y,Y,total number of shoots transplanted ranges from 33000 to 52800,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Y, epiphytic load (but not every monitoring time)","epiphytic load near outer, western end of site was approx. 30%",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Sunroad_MBC,Sunroad_MBC_Plot1of1,Sunroad_MBC_Plot1of1_3mo,Grey literature,MBC Applied Environmental Sciences ,San Diego Bay,Sunroad Marina,32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Other,"The turion bundle/anchor method Fonseca et at. 1982 was used to transplant eelgrass. Eelgrass shoots were separated and bundled into 356 planting units consisting of 15 shoots per bundle. Each bundle was wrapped with a paper skirt and tied together with a wire trash bag tie. Root masses
were not separated so as to retain as much shoot/sediment integrity as possible.",NA,N,Spanish Landing is donor site,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,1989,January,Winter,2,"0, 3, 6, 12, 24",3,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,53625,1232.4517,974.9,47.2,48,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,"""mitigation measures agreed upon in principle by National Marine Fisheries Service, California Department of Fish and Game, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,They measure some data on the site prior to initiating the transplation project,ND,Y,"least terns (Sterna albifrons), Pacific seahors (Hippocampus ingens), many fish (two listed as rare), juvenile banded guitarfish (Zapteryx exasperata), juvenile and adult barred sandbass (Paralabrax nebulifer), spotted sandbass (Paralabrax maculatofasciatus), kelp bass, juvenile California halibut (Paralichtys californicus), shiner surfperch (Cymatogaster aggregata), black surfperch, spotted turbot, diamond turbot (Hypsopsetta guttulata), round stingray (Urolophus halleri), batray, kelpfish, black croaker, topsmelt (Atherinops affinis), pile perch (Damalichtys vacca), lizard fish (Synodus lucioceps)",California halibut,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Sunroad_MBC,Sunroad_MBC_Plot1of1,Sunroad_MBC_Plot1of1_6mo,Grey literature,MBC Applied Environmental Sciences ,San Diego Bay,Sunroad Marina,32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Other,The turion bundle/anchor method Fonseca et at. 1982 was used to transplant eelgrass. Eelgrass shoots were separated and bundled into 356 planting units consisting of 15 shoots per bundle. Each bundle was wrapped with a paper skirt and tied together with a wire trash bag tie. Root masses were not separated so as to retain as much shoot/sediment integrity as possible.,NA,N,Spanish Landing is donor site,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,1989,January,Winter,2,"0, 3, 6, 12, 24",6,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,53625,1232.4517,1113.8,47.2,183.2,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,"""mitigation measures agreed upon in principle by National Marine Fisheries Service, California Department of Fish and Game, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,They measure some data on the site prior to initiating the transplation project,ND,Y,"least terns (Sterna albifrons), Pacific seahors (Hippocampus ingens), many fish (two listed as rare), juvenile banded guitarfish (Zapteryx exasperata), juvenile and adult barred sandbass (Paralabrax nebulifer), spotted sandbass (Paralabrax maculatofasciatus), kelp bass, juvenile California halibut (Paralichtys californicus), shiner surfperch (Cymatogaster aggregata), black surfperch, spotted turbot, diamond turbot (Hypsopsetta guttulata), round stingray (Urolophus halleri), batray, kelpfish, black croaker, topsmelt (Atherinops affinis), pile perch (Damalichtys vacca), lizard fish (Synodus lucioceps)",California halibut,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Sunroad_MBC,Sunroad_MBC_Plot1of1,Sunroad_MBC_Plot1of1_12mo,Grey literature,MBC Applied Environmental Sciences ,San Diego Bay,Sunroad Marina,32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Other,"The turion bundle/anchor method Fonseca et at. 1982 was used to transplant eelgrass. Eelgrass shoots were separated and bundled into 356 planting units consisting of 15 shoots per bundle. Each bundle was wrapped with a paper skirt and tied together with a wire trash bag tie. Root masses
were not separated so as to retain as much shoot/sediment integrity as possible.",NA,N,Spanish Landing is donor site,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,1989,January,Winter,2,"0, 3, 6, 12, 24",12,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,53625,1232.4517,1213.5,47.2,245.6,ND,ND,ND,ND,Y,ND,"""mitigation measures agreed upon in principle by National Marine Fisheries Service, California Department of Fish and Game, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,They measure some data on the site prior to initiating the transplation project,ND,Y,"least terns (Sterna albifrons), small lobster, Pacific seahors (Hippocampus ingens), many fish (two listed as rare), juvenile banded guitarfish (Zapteryx exasperata), juvenile and adult barred sandbass (Paralabrax nebulifer), spotted sandbass (Paralabrax maculatofasciatus), kelp bass, juvenile California halibut (Paralichtys californicus), shiner surfperch (Cymatogaster aggregata), black surfperch, spotted turbot, diamond turbot (Hypsopsetta guttulata), round stingray (Urolophus halleri), batray, kelpfish, black croaker, topsmelt (Atherinops affinis), pile perch (Damalichtys vacca), lizard fish (Synodus lucioceps)",California halibut,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Sunroad_MBC,Sunroad_MBC_Plot1of1,Sunroad_MBC_Plot1of1_24mo,Grey literature,MBC Applied Environmental Sciences ,San Diego Bay,Sunroad Marina,32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Other,"The turion bundle/anchor method Fonseca et at. 1982 was used to transplant eelgrass. Eelgrass shoots were separated and bundled into 356 planting units consisting of 15 shoots per bundle. Each bundle was wrapped with a paper skirt and tied together with a wire trash bag tie. Root masses
were not separated so as to retain as much shoot/sediment integrity as possible.",NA,N,Spanish Landing is donor site,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,1989,January,Winter,2,"0, 3, 6, 12, 24",24,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,53625,1232.4517,1189.7,47.2,253.6,ND,ND,ND,ND,Y,ND,"""mitigation measures agreed upon in principle by National Marine Fisheries Service, California Department of Fish and Game, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,They measure some data on the site prior to initiating the transplation project,ND,Y,"least terns (Sterna albifrons), small lobster, Pacific seahors (Hippocampus ingens), many fish (two listed as rare), juvenile banded guitarfish (Zapteryx exasperata), juvenile and adult barred sandbass (Paralabrax nebulifer), spotted sandbass (Paralabrax maculatofasciatus), kelp bass, juvenile California halibut (Paralichtys californicus), shiner surfperch (Cymatogaster aggregata), black surfperch, spotted turbot, diamond turbot (Hypsopsetta guttulata), round stingray (Urolophus halleri), batray, kelpfish, black croaker, topsmelt (Atherinops affinis), pile perch (Damalichtys vacca), lizard fish (Synodus lucioceps)",California halibut,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
CrownCove_Merkel,CrownCove_Merkel_Plot1of1,CrownCove_Merkel_Plot1of1_3mo,Grey literature,"Merkel & Associates, Inc.",San Diego Bay,"Crown Cove Aquatic Center (5000 Highway 75, Coronado, CA)",32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,The transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom.,NA,Y,"Eelgrass was harvested from the adjacent eelgrass bed (97 units) and a continuation of this bed located offshore of Crown Isle, midway between the Crown Cove and the Loews Coronado Hotel (300 units).",142,171,207.2,ND,192,ND,ND,ND,NA,2012,March,Spring,1,"0, 3, 6, 12",3,1.74,-1,the restoration area was previously graded to lower the site elevation from being above MLLW to approximately -1 foot MLLW,ND,ND,3176-4764,397,259,10,72,39,ND,ND,SCEMP,ND,ND,"It says that the project is currently meeting mitigation requirements, but it doesn't specifically address density",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
CrownCove_Merkel,CrownCove_Merkel_Plot1of1,CrownCove_Merkel_Plot1of1_6mo,Grey literature,"Merkel & Associates, Inc.",San Diego Bay,"Crown Cove Aquatic Center (5000 Highway 75, Coronado, CA)",32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,The transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom.,NA,Y,"Eelgrass was harvested from the adjacent eelgrass bed (97 units) and a continuation of this bed located offshore of Crown Isle, midway between the Crown Cove and the Loews Coronado Hotel (300 units).",142,182,207.2,ND,236.6,73.5,ND,ND,NA,2012,March,Spring,1,"0, 3, 6, 12",6,1.74,-1,the restoration area was previously graded to lower the site elevation from being above MLLW to approximately -1 foot MLLW,ND,ND,3176-4764,397,253,10,200.2,77.4,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,Y,"It says that the project is currently meeting mitigation requirements, but it doesn't specifically address density",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
CrownCove_Merkel,CrownCove_Merkel_Plot1of1,CrownCove_Merkel_Plot1of1_12mo,Grey literature,"Merkel & Associates, Inc.",San Diego Bay,"Crown Cove Aquatic Center (5000 Highway 75, Coronado, CA)",32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,The transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom.,NA,Y,"Eelgrass was harvested from the adjacent eelgrass bed (97 units) and a continuation of this bed located offshore of Crown Isle, midway between the Crown Cove and the Loews Coronado Hotel (300 units).",142,141,207.2,ND,214.5,197.3,ND,ND,NA,2012,March,Spring,1,"0, 3, 6, 12",12,1.74,-1,the restoration area was previously graded to lower the site elevation from being above MLLW to approximately -1 foot MLLW,ND,ND,3176-4764,397,273,10,513.5,286.8,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,Y,"It says that the project is currently meeting mitigation requirements, but it doesn't specifically address density",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
JZG_AnaheimBay,JZG_AnaheimBay_InnerHarbor_Area2,AnaheimBay_InnerHarbor_Area2_6mo,Grey literature,"Merkel & Associates, Inc.",Huntington Harbor,33¡ 44.104Õ N; _118¡ 5.88Õ (Lat; Long. decimal minutes),33.73,-118.08,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"The transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom. Eelgrass was harvested by hand and processed into planting units of 8_10 turions (leaf_shoots) per unit
planting units were processed the same day that harvesting was completed and were planted within 24
hours of unit preparation. Planting was completed with variable unit counts and planting unit spacing as
indicated in Table 1.",NA,Y,"""Eelgrass was harvested from natural donor beds within the inner and outer harbors of Anaheim Bay, as
well as from the nearby Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve, where less than 10% of the bed was harvested.
Due to sparse occurrence of eelgrass within on_site donor beds as a result of early seasonal regrowth,
adequate material could not be harvested on_site and still meet the California Department of Fish &
Wildlife 10 percent harvest limitations within the aquatic plant transplant letter of approval. For this
reason, expansion of harvest areas was requested from the Department of Fish & Wildlife and was
approved after the first day of work. Because the restored eelgrass within the Bolsa Chica Ecological
Reserve originated partially from Anaheim Bay, it was identified as the logical candidate as a
supplemental donor site to meet the eelgrass volume requirements in a timely fashion.""",600,693,ND,ND,118.9,57.6,ND,ND,NA,2012,April-May,Spring,2,"0, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48",6,7.8,ND,NA,ND,ND,5600-7000,709,216,9,51.2,24.8,ND,ND,SCEMP,NA,NA,"Inner bay was held to mitigation success criteria, but because the outer bay was wapparently extra, they don't evaluate for meeting of success criteria. 
""Eelgrass was harvested by hand and processed into planting units of 8_10 turions (leaf_shoots) per. These planting units were processed the same day that harvesting was completed and were planted within 24 hours of unit preparation. Harvesting and planting were accomplished by SCUBA divers, planting each unit on 1_meter centers within the three Inner Harbor transplant sites and reduced densities of an intended 1.5_meter centers for the two outer harbor sites. Because the Outer Harbor sites supported a number of small, unmappable seedlings, plantings were omitted where natural seedlings occurred in order to optimize the planting area. This resulted in an average density of 1.9_ meter centers within the planting zone. Planting was completed with variable unit counts and planting unit spacing as indicated in Table 1.""",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,They measure plant height and ephiphytic loading,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
JZG_AnaheimBay,JZG_AnaheimBay_InnerHarbor_Area2,AnaheimBay_InnerHarbor_Area2_12mo,Grey literature,"Merkel & Associates, Inc.",Huntington Harbor,33¡ 44.104Õ N; _118¡ 5.88Õ (Lat; Long. decimal minutes),33.73,-118.08,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,The transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom. Eelgrass was harvested by hand and processed into planting units of 8_10 turions (leaf_shoots) per unit planting units were processed the same day that harvesting was completed and were planted within 24 hours of unit preparation. Planting was completed with variable unit counts and planting unit spacing as indicated in Table 1.,NA,Y,"Eelgrass was harvested from natural donor beds within the inner and outer harbors of Anaheim Bay, as
well as from the nearby Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve, where less than 10% of the bed was harvested.
Due to sparse occurrence of eelgrass within on_site donor beds as a result of early seasonal regrowth,
adequate material could not be harvested on_site and still meet the California Department of Fish &
Wildlife 10 percent harvest limitations within the aquatic plant transplant letter of approval. For this
reason, expansion of harvest areas was requested from the Department of Fish & Wildlife and was
approved after the first day of work. Because the restored eelgrass within the Bolsa Chica Ecological
Reserve originated partially from Anaheim Bay, it was identified as the logical candidate as a
supplemental donor site to meet the eelgrass volume requirements in a timely fashion.",600,851,ND,ND,191.2,101.8,ND,ND,NA,2012,April-May,Spring,2,"0, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48",12,7.8,ND,NA,ND,ND,5600-7000,709,459,9,91.2,60.8,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,Y,"Inner bay was held to mitigation success criteria, but because the outer bay was wapparently extra, they don't evaluate for meeting of success criteria. 
""Eelgrass was harvested by hand and processed into planting units of 8_10 turions (leaf_shoots) per. These planting units were processed the same day that harvesting was completed and were planted within 24 hours of unit preparation. Harvesting and planting were accomplished by SCUBA divers, planting each unit on 1_meter centers within the three Inner Harbor transplant sites and reduced densities of an intended 1.5_meter centers for the two outer harbor sites. Because the Outer Harbor sites supported a number of small, unmappable seedlings, plantings were omitted where natural seedlings occurred in order to optimize the planting area. This resulted in an average density of 1.9_ meter centers within the planting zone. Planting was completed with variable unit counts and planting unit spacing as indicated in Table 1.""",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,They measure plant height and ephiphytic loading,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
JZG_AnaheimBay,JZG_AnaheimBay_InnerHarbor_Area2,AnaheimBay_InnerHarbor_Area2_24mo,Grey literature,"Merkel & Associates, Inc.",Huntington Harbor,33¡ 44.104Õ N; _118¡ 5.88Õ (Lat; Long. decimal minutes),33.73,-118.08,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,The transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom. Eelgrass was harvested by hand and processed into planting units of 8_10 turions (leaf_shoots) per unit planting units were processed the same day that harvesting was completed and were planted within 24 hours of unit preparation. Planting was completed with variable unit counts and planting unit spacing as indicated in Table 1.,NA,Y,"""Eelgrass was harvested from natural donor beds within the inner and outer harbors of Anaheim Bay, as
well as from the nearby Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve, where less than 10% of the bed was harvested.
Due to sparse occurrence of eelgrass within on_site donor beds as a result of early seasonal regrowth,
adequate material could not be harvested on_site and still meet the California Department of Fish &
Wildlife 10 percent harvest limitations within the aquatic plant transplant letter of approval. For this
reason, expansion of harvest areas was requested from the Department of Fish & Wildlife and was
approved after the first day of work. Because the restored eelgrass within the Bolsa Chica Ecological
Reserve originated partially from Anaheim Bay, it was identified as the logical candidate as a
supplemental donor site to meet the eelgrass volume requirements in a timely fashion.""",600,955,ND,ND,192.8,109.3,ND,ND,NA,2012,April-May,Spring,2,"0, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48",24,7.8,ND,NA,ND,ND,5600-7000,709,436,9,240,151.8,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,Y,"Inner bay was held to mitigation success criteria, but because the outer bay was wapparently extra, they don't evaluate for meeting of success criteria. 
""Eelgrass was harvested by hand and processed into planting units of 8_10 turions (leaf_shoots) per. These planting units were processed the same day that harvesting was completed and were planted within 24 hours of unit preparation. Harvesting and planting were accomplished by SCUBA divers, planting each unit on 1_meter centers within the three Inner Harbor transplant sites and reduced densities of an intended 1.5_meter centers for the two outer harbor sites. Because the Outer Harbor sites supported a number of small, unmappable seedlings, plantings were omitted where natural seedlings occurred in order to optimize the planting area. This resulted in an average density of 1.9_ meter centers within the planting zone. Planting was completed with variable unit counts and planting unit spacing as indicated in Table 1.""",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,They measure plant height and ephiphytic loading,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
JZG_AnaheimBay,JZG_AnaheimBay_InnerHarbor_Area2,AnaheimBay_InnerHarbor_Area2_36mo,Grey literature,"Merkel & Associates, Inc.",Huntington Harbor,33¡ 44.104Õ N; _118¡ 5.88Õ (Lat; Long. decimal minutes),33.73,-118.08,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,The transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom. Eelgrass was harvested by hand and processed into planting units of 8_10 turions (leaf_shoots) per unit planting units were processed the same day that harvesting was completed and were planted within 24 hours of unit preparation. Planting was completed with variable unit counts and planting unit spacing as indicated in Table 1.,NA,Y,"""Eelgrass was harvested from natural donor beds within the inner and outer harbors of Anaheim Bay, as
well as from the nearby Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve, where less than 10% of the bed was harvested.
Due to sparse occurrence of eelgrass within on_site donor beds as a result of early seasonal regrowth,
adequate material could not be harvested on_site and still meet the California Department of Fish &
Wildlife 10 percent harvest limitations within the aquatic plant transplant letter of approval. For this
reason, expansion of harvest areas was requested from the Department of Fish & Wildlife and was
approved after the first day of work. Because the restored eelgrass within the Bolsa Chica Ecological
Reserve originated partially from Anaheim Bay, it was identified as the logical candidate as a
supplemental donor site to meet the eelgrass volume requirements in a timely fashion.""",600,1337,ND,ND,130,ND,ND,ND,NA,2012,April-May,Spring,2,"0, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48",36,7.8,ND,NA,ND,ND,5600-7000,709,ND,9,ND,ND,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,Y,"Inner bay was held to mitigation success criteria, but because the outer bay was wapparently extra, they don't evaluate for meeting of success criteria. 
""Eelgrass was harvested by hand and processed into planting units of 8_10 turions (leaf_shoots) per. These planting units were processed the same day that harvesting was completed and were planted within 24 hours of unit preparation. Harvesting and planting were accomplished by SCUBA divers, planting each unit on 1_meter centers within the three Inner Harbor transplant sites and reduced densities of an intended 1.5_meter centers for the two outer harbor sites. Because the Outer Harbor sites supported a number of small, unmappable seedlings, plantings were omitted where natural seedlings occurred in order to optimize the planting area. This resulted in an average density of 1.9_ meter centers within the planting zone. Planting was completed with variable unit counts and planting unit spacing as indicated in Table 1.""",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,They measure plant height and ephiphytic loading,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
JZG_AnaheimBay,JZG_AnaheimBay_InnerHarbor_Area2,AnaheimBay_InnerHarbor_Area2_48mo,Grey literature,"Merkel & Associates, Inc.",Huntington Harbor,33¡ 44.104Õ N; _118¡ 5.88Õ (Lat; Long. decimal minutes),33.73,-118.08,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,The transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom. Eelgrass was harvested by hand and processed into planting units of 8_10 turions (leaf_shoots) per unit planting units were processed the same day that harvesting was completed and were planted within 24 hours of unit preparation. Planting was completed with variable unit counts and planting unit spacing as indicated in Table 1.,NA,Y,"""Eelgrass was harvested from natural donor beds within the inner and outer harbors of Anaheim Bay, as
well as from the nearby Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve, where less than 10% of the bed was harvested.
Due to sparse occurrence of eelgrass within on_site donor beds as a result of early seasonal regrowth,
adequate material could not be harvested on_site and still meet the California Department of Fish &
Wildlife 10 percent harvest limitations within the aquatic plant transplant letter of approval. For this
reason, expansion of harvest areas was requested from the Department of Fish & Wildlife and was
approved after the first day of work. Because the restored eelgrass within the Bolsa Chica Ecological
Reserve originated partially from Anaheim Bay, it was identified as the logical candidate as a
supplemental donor site to meet the eelgrass volume requirements in a timely fashion.""",600,1099,ND,ND,72,40.8,ND,ND,NA,2012,April-May,Spring,2,"0, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48",48,7.8,ND,NA,ND,ND,5600-7000,709,613,9,132.8,39.9,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,Y,"Inner bay was held to mitigation success criteria, but because the outer bay was wapparently extra, they don't evaluate for meeting of success criteria. 
""Eelgrass was harvested by hand and processed into planting units of 8_10 turions (leaf_shoots) per. These planting units were processed the same day that harvesting was completed and were planted within 24 hours of unit preparation. Harvesting and planting were accomplished by SCUBA divers, planting each unit on 1_meter centers within the three Inner Harbor transplant sites and reduced densities of an intended 1.5_meter centers for the two outer harbor sites. Because the Outer Harbor sites supported a number of small, unmappable seedlings, plantings were omitted where natural seedlings occurred in order to optimize the planting area. This resulted in an average density of 1.9_ meter centers within the planting zone. Planting was completed with variable unit counts and planting unit spacing as indicated in Table 1.""",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,They measure plant height and ephiphytic loading,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
JZG_AnaheimBay,JZG_AnaheimBay_InnerHarbor_Area3,AnaheimBay_InnerHarbor_Area3_6mo,Grey literature,"Merkel & Associates, Inc.",Huntington Harbor,33¡ 44.104Õ N; _118¡ 5.88Õ (Lat; Long. decimal minutes),33.73,-118.08,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,The transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom. Eelgrass was harvested by hand and processed into planting units of 8_10 turions (leaf_shoots) per unit planting units were processed the same day that harvesting was completed and were planted within 24 hours of unit preparation. Planting was completed with variable unit counts and planting unit spacing as indicated in Table 1.,NA,Y,"""Eelgrass was harvested from natural donor beds within the inner and outer harbors of Anaheim Bay, as
well as from the nearby Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve, where less than 10% of the bed was harvested.
Due to sparse occurrence of eelgrass within on_site donor beds as a result of early seasonal regrowth,
adequate material could not be harvested on_site and still meet the California Department of Fish &
Wildlife 10 percent harvest limitations within the aquatic plant transplant letter of approval. For this
reason, expansion of harvest areas was requested from the Department of Fish & Wildlife and was
approved after the first day of work. Because the restored eelgrass within the Bolsa Chica Ecological
Reserve originated partially from Anaheim Bay, it was identified as the logical candidate as a
supplemental donor site to meet the eelgrass volume requirements in a timely fashion.""",600,693,ND,ND,118.9,57.6,ND,ND,NA,2012,April-May,Spring,2,"0, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48",6,7.8,ND,NA,ND,ND,5200-6500,647,88,9,52.8,39.2,ND,ND,SCEMP,NA,NA,"Inner bay was held to mitigation success criteria, but because the outer bay was wapparently extra, they don't evaluate for meeting of success criteria. 
""Eelgrass was harvested by hand and processed into planting units of 8_10 turions (leaf_shoots) per. These planting units were processed the same day that harvesting was completed and were planted within 24 hours of unit preparation. Harvesting and planting were accomplished by SCUBA divers, planting each unit on 1_meter centers within the three Inner Harbor transplant sites and reduced densities of an intended 1.5_meter centers for the two outer harbor sites. Because the Outer Harbor sites supported a number of small, unmappable seedlings, plantings were omitted where natural seedlings occurred in order to optimize the planting area. This resulted in an average density of 1.9_ meter centers within the planting zone. Planting was completed with variable unit counts and planting unit spacing as indicated in Table 1.""",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,They measure plant height and ephiphytic loading,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
JZG_AnaheimBay,JZG_AnaheimBay_InnerHarbor_Area3,AnaheimBay_InnerHarbor_Area3_12mo,Grey literature,"Merkel & Associates, Inc.",Huntington Harbor,33¡ 44.104Õ N; _118¡ 5.88Õ (Lat; Long. decimal minutes),33.73,-118.08,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,The transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom. Eelgrass was harvested by hand and processed into planting units of 8_10 turions (leaf_shoots) per unit planting units were processed the same day that harvesting was completed and were planted within 24 hours of unit preparation. Planting was completed with variable unit counts and planting unit spacing as indicated in Table 1.,NA,Y,"""Eelgrass was harvested from natural donor beds within the inner and outer harbors of Anaheim Bay, as
well as from the nearby Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve, where less than 10% of the bed was harvested.
Due to sparse occurrence of eelgrass within on_site donor beds as a result of early seasonal regrowth,
adequate material could not be harvested on_site and still meet the California Department of Fish &
Wildlife 10 percent harvest limitations within the aquatic plant transplant letter of approval. For this
reason, expansion of harvest areas was requested from the Department of Fish & Wildlife and was
approved after the first day of work. Because the restored eelgrass within the Bolsa Chica Ecological
Reserve originated partially from Anaheim Bay, it was identified as the logical candidate as a
supplemental donor site to meet the eelgrass volume requirements in a timely fashion.""",600,851,ND,ND,191.2,101.8,ND,ND,NA,2012,April-May,Spring,2,"0, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48",12,7.8,ND,NA,ND,ND,5200-6500,647,319,9,105.6,44.7,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,Y,"Inner bay was held to mitigation success criteria, but because the outer bay was wapparently extra, they don't evaluate for meeting of success criteria. 
""Eelgrass was harvested by hand and processed into planting units of 8_10 turions (leaf_shoots) per. These planting units were processed the same day that harvesting was completed and were planted within 24 hours of unit preparation. Harvesting and planting were accomplished by SCUBA divers, planting each unit on 1_meter centers within the three Inner Harbor transplant sites and reduced densities of an intended 1.5_meter centers for the two outer harbor sites. Because the Outer Harbor sites supported a number of small, unmappable seedlings, plantings were omitted where natural seedlings occurred in order to optimize the planting area. This resulted in an average density of 1.9_ meter centers within the planting zone. Planting was completed with variable unit counts and planting unit spacing as indicated in Table 1.""",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,They measure plant height and ephiphytic loading,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
JZG_AnaheimBay,JZG_AnaheimBay_InnerHarbor_Area3,AnaheimBay_InnerHarbor_Area3_24mo,Grey literature,"Merkel & Associates, Inc.",Huntington Harbor,33¡ 44.104Õ N; _118¡ 5.88Õ (Lat; Long. decimal minutes),33.73,-118.08,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,The transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom. Eelgrass was harvested by hand and processed into planting units of 8_10 turions (leaf_shoots) per unit planting units were processed the same day that harvesting was completed and were planted within 24 hours of unit preparation. Planting was completed with variable unit counts and planting unit spacing as indicated in Table 1.,NA,Y,"""Eelgrass was harvested from natural donor beds within the inner and outer harbors of Anaheim Bay, as
well as from the nearby Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve, where less than 10% of the bed was harvested.
Due to sparse occurrence of eelgrass within on_site donor beds as a result of early seasonal regrowth,
adequate material could not be harvested on_site and still meet the California Department of Fish &
Wildlife 10 percent harvest limitations within the aquatic plant transplant letter of approval. For this
reason, expansion of harvest areas was requested from the Department of Fish & Wildlife and was
approved after the first day of work. Because the restored eelgrass within the Bolsa Chica Ecological
Reserve originated partially from Anaheim Bay, it was identified as the logical candidate as a
supplemental donor site to meet the eelgrass volume requirements in a timely fashion.""",600,955,ND,ND,192.8,109.3,ND,ND,NA,2012,April-May,Spring,2,"0, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48",24,7.8,ND,NA,ND,ND,5200-6500,647,450,9,131.2,83.9,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,Y,"Inner bay was held to mitigation success criteria, but because the outer bay was wapparently extra, they don't evaluate for meeting of success criteria. 
""Eelgrass was harvested by hand and processed into planting units of 8_10 turions (leaf_shoots) per. These planting units were processed the same day that harvesting was completed and were planted within 24 hours of unit preparation. Harvesting and planting were accomplished by SCUBA divers, planting each unit on 1_meter centers within the three Inner Harbor transplant sites and reduced densities of an intended 1.5_meter centers for the two outer harbor sites. Because the Outer Harbor sites supported a number of small, unmappable seedlings, plantings were omitted where natural seedlings occurred in order to optimize the planting area. This resulted in an average density of 1.9_ meter centers within the planting zone. Planting was completed with variable unit counts and planting unit spacing as indicated in Table 1.""",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,They measure plant height and ephiphytic loading,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
JZG_AnaheimBay,JZG_AnaheimBay_InnerHarbor_Area3,AnaheimBay_InnerHarbor_Area3_36mo,Grey literature,"Merkel & Associates, Inc.",Huntington Harbor,33¡ 44.104Õ N; _118¡ 5.88Õ (Lat; Long. decimal minutes),33.73,-118.08,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,The transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom. Eelgrass was harvested by hand and processed into planting units of 8_10 turions (leaf_shoots) per unit planting units were processed the same day that harvesting was completed and were planted within 24 hours of unit preparation. Planting was completed with variable unit counts and planting unit spacing as indicated in Table 1.,NA,Y,"""Eelgrass was harvested from natural donor beds within the inner and outer harbors of Anaheim Bay, as
well as from the nearby Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve, where less than 10% of the bed was harvested.
Due to sparse occurrence of eelgrass within on_site donor beds as a result of early seasonal regrowth,
adequate material could not be harvested on_site and still meet the California Department of Fish &
Wildlife 10 percent harvest limitations within the aquatic plant transplant letter of approval. For this
reason, expansion of harvest areas was requested from the Department of Fish & Wildlife and was
approved after the first day of work. Because the restored eelgrass within the Bolsa Chica Ecological
Reserve originated partially from Anaheim Bay, it was identified as the logical candidate as a
supplemental donor site to meet the eelgrass volume requirements in a timely fashion.""",600,1337,ND,ND,130,ND,ND,ND,NA,2012,April-May,Spring,2,"0, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48",36,7.8,ND,NA,ND,ND,5200-6500,647,ND,9,ND,ND,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,Y,"Inner bay was held to mitigation success criteria, but because the outer bay was wapparently extra, they don't evaluate for meeting of success criteria. 
""Eelgrass was harvested by hand and processed into planting units of 8_10 turions (leaf_shoots) per. These planting units were processed the same day that harvesting was completed and were planted within 24 hours of unit preparation. Harvesting and planting were accomplished by SCUBA divers, planting each unit on 1_meter centers within the three Inner Harbor transplant sites and reduced densities of an intended 1.5_meter centers for the two outer harbor sites. Because the Outer Harbor sites supported a number of small, unmappable seedlings, plantings were omitted where natural seedlings occurred in order to optimize the planting area. This resulted in an average density of 1.9_ meter centers within the planting zone. Planting was completed with variable unit counts and planting unit spacing as indicated in Table 1.""",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,They measure plant height and ephiphytic loading,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
JZG_AnaheimBay,JZG_AnaheimBay_InnerHarbor_Area3,AnaheimBay_InnerHarbor_Area3_48mo,Grey literature,"Merkel & Associates, Inc.",Huntington Harbor,33¡ 44.104Õ N; _118¡ 5.88Õ (Lat; Long. decimal minutes),33.73,-118.08,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,The transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom. Eelgrass was harvested by hand and processed into planting units of 8_10 turions (leaf_shoots) per unit planting units were processed the same day that harvesting was completed and were planted within 24 hours of unit preparation. Planting was completed with variable unit counts and planting unit spacing as indicated in Table 1.,NA,Y,"""Eelgrass was harvested from natural donor beds within the inner and outer harbors of Anaheim Bay, as
well as from the nearby Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve, where less than 10% of the bed was harvested.
Due to sparse occurrence of eelgrass within on_site donor beds as a result of early seasonal regrowth,
adequate material could not be harvested on_site and still meet the California Department of Fish &
Wildlife 10 percent harvest limitations within the aquatic plant transplant letter of approval. For this
reason, expansion of harvest areas was requested from the Department of Fish & Wildlife and was
approved after the first day of work. Because the restored eelgrass within the Bolsa Chica Ecological
Reserve originated partially from Anaheim Bay, it was identified as the logical candidate as a
supplemental donor site to meet the eelgrass volume requirements in a timely fashion.""",600,1099,ND,ND,72,40.8,ND,ND,NA,2012,April-May,Spring,2,"0, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48",48,7.8,ND,NA,ND,ND,5200-6500,647,522,9,160,64,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,Y,"Inner bay was held to mitigation success criteria, but because the outer bay was wapparently extra, they don't evaluate for meeting of success criteria. 
""Eelgrass was harvested by hand and processed into planting units of 8_10 turions (leaf_shoots) per. These planting units were processed the same day that harvesting was completed and were planted within 24 hours of unit preparation. Harvesting and planting were accomplished by SCUBA divers, planting each unit on 1_meter centers within the three Inner Harbor transplant sites and reduced densities of an intended 1.5_meter centers for the two outer harbor sites. Because the Outer Harbor sites supported a number of small, unmappable seedlings, plantings were omitted where natural seedlings occurred in order to optimize the planting area. This resulted in an average density of 1.9_ meter centers within the planting zone. Planting was completed with variable unit counts and planting unit spacing as indicated in Table 1.""",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,They measure plant height and ephiphytic loading,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
JZG_AnaheimBay,JZG_AnaheimBay_InnerHarbor_Area4,AnaheimBay_InnerHarbor_Area4_6mo,Grey literature,"Merkel & Associates, Inc.",Huntington Harbor,33¡ 44.104Õ N; _118¡ 5.88Õ (Lat; Long. decimal minutes),33.73,-118.08,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,The transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom. Eelgrass was harvested by hand and processed into planting units of 8_10 turions (leaf_shoots) per unit planting units were processed the same day that harvesting was completed and were planted within 24 hours of unit preparation. Planting was completed with variable unit counts and planting unit spacing as indicated in Table 1.,NA,Y,"""Eelgrass was harvested from natural donor beds within the inner and outer harbors of Anaheim Bay, as
well as from the nearby Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve, where less than 10% of the bed was harvested.
Due to sparse occurrence of eelgrass within on_site donor beds as a result of early seasonal regrowth,
adequate material could not be harvested on_site and still meet the California Department of Fish &
Wildlife 10 percent harvest limitations within the aquatic plant transplant letter of approval. For this
reason, expansion of harvest areas was requested from the Department of Fish & Wildlife and was
approved after the first day of work. Because the restored eelgrass within the Bolsa Chica Ecological
Reserve originated partially from Anaheim Bay, it was identified as the logical candidate as a
supplemental donor site to meet the eelgrass volume requirements in a timely fashion.""",600,693,ND,ND,118.9,57.6,ND,ND,NA,2012,April-May,Spring,2,"0, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48",6,7.8,ND,NA,ND,ND,2200-2750,280,3,9,ND,ND,ND,ND,SCEMP,NA,NA,"Inner bay was held to mitigation success criteria, but because the outer bay was wapparently extra, they don't evaluate for meeting of success criteria. 
""Eelgrass was harvested by hand and processed into planting units of 8_10 turions (leaf_shoots) per. These planting units were processed the same day that harvesting was completed and were planted within 24 hours of unit preparation. Harvesting and planting were accomplished by SCUBA divers, planting each unit on 1_meter centers within the three Inner Harbor transplant sites and reduced densities of an intended 1.5_meter centers for the two outer harbor sites. Because the Outer Harbor sites supported a number of small, unmappable seedlings, plantings were omitted where natural seedlings occurred in order to optimize the planting area. This resulted in an average density of 1.9_ meter centers within the planting zone. Planting was completed with variable unit counts and planting unit spacing as indicated in Table 1.""",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,They measure plant height and ephiphytic loading,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
JZG_AnaheimBay,JZG_AnaheimBay_InnerHarbor_Area4,AnaheimBay_InnerHarbor_Area4_12mo,Grey literature,"Merkel & Associates, Inc.",Huntington Harbor,33¡ 44.104Õ N; _118¡ 5.88Õ (Lat; Long. decimal minutes),33.73,-118.08,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,The transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom. Eelgrass was harvested by hand and processed into planting units of 8_10 turions (leaf_shoots) per unit planting units were processed the same day that harvesting was completed and were planted within 24 hours of unit preparation. Planting was completed with variable unit counts and planting unit spacing as indicated in Table 1.,NA,Y,"""Eelgrass was harvested from natural donor beds within the inner and outer harbors of Anaheim Bay, as
well as from the nearby Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve, where less than 10% of the bed was harvested.
Due to sparse occurrence of eelgrass within on_site donor beds as a result of early seasonal regrowth,
adequate material could not be harvested on_site and still meet the California Department of Fish &
Wildlife 10 percent harvest limitations within the aquatic plant transplant letter of approval. For this
reason, expansion of harvest areas was requested from the Department of Fish & Wildlife and was
approved after the first day of work. Because the restored eelgrass within the Bolsa Chica Ecological
Reserve originated partially from Anaheim Bay, it was identified as the logical candidate as a
supplemental donor site to meet the eelgrass volume requirements in a timely fashion.""",600,851,ND,ND,191.2,101.8,ND,ND,NA,2012,April-May,Spring,2,"0, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48",12,7.8,ND,NA,ND,ND,2200-2750,280,57,9,ND,ND,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,Y,"Inner bay was held to mitigation success criteria, but because the outer bay was wapparently extra, they don't evaluate for meeting of success criteria. 
""Eelgrass was harvested by hand and processed into planting units of 8_10 turions (leaf_shoots) per. These planting units were processed the same day that harvesting was completed and were planted within 24 hours of unit preparation. Harvesting and planting were accomplished by SCUBA divers, planting each unit on 1_meter centers within the three Inner Harbor transplant sites and reduced densities of an intended 1.5_meter centers for the two outer harbor sites. Because the Outer Harbor sites supported a number of small, unmappable seedlings, plantings were omitted where natural seedlings occurred in order to optimize the planting area. This resulted in an average density of 1.9_ meter centers within the planting zone. Planting was completed with variable unit counts and planting unit spacing as indicated in Table 1.""",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,They measure plant height and ephiphytic loading,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
JZG_AnaheimBay,JZG_AnaheimBay_InnerHarbor_Area4,AnaheimBay_InnerHarbor_Area4_24mo,Grey literature,"Merkel & Associates, Inc.",Huntington Harbor,33¡ 44.104Õ N; _118¡ 5.88Õ (Lat; Long. decimal minutes),33.73,-118.08,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,The transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom. Eelgrass was harvested by hand and processed into planting units of 8_10 turions (leaf_shoots) per unit planting units were processed the same day that harvesting was completed and were planted within 24 hours of unit preparation. Planting was completed with variable unit counts and planting unit spacing as indicated in Table 1.,NA,Y,"""Eelgrass was harvested from natural donor beds within the inner and outer harbors of Anaheim Bay, as
well as from the nearby Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve, where less than 10% of the bed was harvested.
Due to sparse occurrence of eelgrass within on_site donor beds as a result of early seasonal regrowth,
adequate material could not be harvested on_site and still meet the California Department of Fish &
Wildlife 10 percent harvest limitations within the aquatic plant transplant letter of approval. For this
reason, expansion of harvest areas was requested from the Department of Fish & Wildlife and was
approved after the first day of work. Because the restored eelgrass within the Bolsa Chica Ecological
Reserve originated partially from Anaheim Bay, it was identified as the logical candidate as a
supplemental donor site to meet the eelgrass volume requirements in a timely fashion.""",600,955,ND,ND,192.8,109.3,ND,ND,NA,2012,April-May,Spring,2,"0, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48",24,7.8,ND,NA,ND,ND,2200-2750,280,65,9,131.2,97.7,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,Y,"Inner bay was held to mitigation success criteria, but because the outer bay was wapparently extra, they don't evaluate for meeting of success criteria. 
""Eelgrass was harvested by hand and processed into planting units of 8_10 turions (leaf_shoots) per. These planting units were processed the same day that harvesting was completed and were planted within 24 hours of unit preparation. Harvesting and planting were accomplished by SCUBA divers, planting each unit on 1_meter centers within the three Inner Harbor transplant sites and reduced densities of an intended 1.5_meter centers for the two outer harbor sites. Because the Outer Harbor sites supported a number of small, unmappable seedlings, plantings were omitted where natural seedlings occurred in order to optimize the planting area. This resulted in an average density of 1.9_ meter centers within the planting zone. Planting was completed with variable unit counts and planting unit spacing as indicated in Table 1.""",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,They measure plant height and ephiphytic loading,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
JZG_AnaheimBay,JZG_AnaheimBay_InnerHarbor_Area4,AnaheimBay_InnerHarbor_Area4_36mo,Grey literature,"Merkel & Associates, Inc.",Huntington Harbor,33¡ 44.104Õ N; _118¡ 5.88Õ (Lat; Long. decimal minutes),33.73,-118.08,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,The transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom. Eelgrass was harvested by hand and processed into planting units of 8_10 turions (leaf_shoots) per unit planting units were processed the same day that harvesting was completed and were planted within 24 hours of unit preparation. Planting was completed with variable unit counts and planting unit spacing as indicated in Table 1.,NA,Y,"""Eelgrass was harvested from natural donor beds within the inner and outer harbors of Anaheim Bay, as
well as from the nearby Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve, where less than 10% of the bed was harvested.
Due to sparse occurrence of eelgrass within on_site donor beds as a result of early seasonal regrowth,
adequate material could not be harvested on_site and still meet the California Department of Fish &
Wildlife 10 percent harvest limitations within the aquatic plant transplant letter of approval. For this
reason, expansion of harvest areas was requested from the Department of Fish & Wildlife and was
approved after the first day of work. Because the restored eelgrass within the Bolsa Chica Ecological
Reserve originated partially from Anaheim Bay, it was identified as the logical candidate as a
supplemental donor site to meet the eelgrass volume requirements in a timely fashion.""",600,1337,ND,ND,130,ND,ND,ND,NA,2012,April-May,Spring,2,"0, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48",36,7.8,ND,NA,ND,ND,2200-2750,280,ND,9,ND,ND,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,Y,"Inner bay was held to mitigation success criteria, but because the outer bay was wapparently extra, they don't evaluate for meeting of success criteria. 
""Eelgrass was harvested by hand and processed into planting units of 8_10 turions (leaf_shoots) per. These planting units were processed the same day that harvesting was completed and were planted within 24 hours of unit preparation. Harvesting and planting were accomplished by SCUBA divers, planting each unit on 1_meter centers within the three Inner Harbor transplant sites and reduced densities of an intended 1.5_meter centers for the two outer harbor sites. Because the Outer Harbor sites supported a number of small, unmappable seedlings, plantings were omitted where natural seedlings occurred in order to optimize the planting area. This resulted in an average density of 1.9_ meter centers within the planting zone. Planting was completed with variable unit counts and planting unit spacing as indicated in Table 1.""",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,They measure plant height and ephiphytic loading,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
JZG_AnaheimBay,JZG_AnaheimBay_InnerHarbor_Area4,AnaheimBay_InnerHarbor_Area4_48mo,Grey literature,"Merkel & Associates, Inc.",Huntington Harbor,33¡ 44.104Õ N; _118¡ 5.88Õ (Lat; Long. decimal minutes),33.73,-118.08,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,The transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom. Eelgrass was harvested by hand and processed into planting units of 8_10 turions (leaf_shoots) per unit planting units were processed the same day that harvesting was completed and were planted within 24 hours of unit preparation. Planting was completed with variable unit counts and planting unit spacing as indicated in Table 1.,NA,Y,"""Eelgrass was harvested from natural donor beds within the inner and outer harbors of Anaheim Bay, as
well as from the nearby Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve, where less than 10% of the bed was harvested.
Due to sparse occurrence of eelgrass within on_site donor beds as a result of early seasonal regrowth,
adequate material could not be harvested on_site and still meet the California Department of Fish &
Wildlife 10 percent harvest limitations within the aquatic plant transplant letter of approval. For this
reason, expansion of harvest areas was requested from the Department of Fish & Wildlife and was
approved after the first day of work. Because the restored eelgrass within the Bolsa Chica Ecological
Reserve originated partially from Anaheim Bay, it was identified as the logical candidate as a
supplemental donor site to meet the eelgrass volume requirements in a timely fashion.""",600,1099,ND,ND,72,40.8,ND,ND,NA,2012,April-May,Spring,2,"0, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48",48,7.8,ND,NA,ND,ND,2200-2750,280,22,9,166.4,82.3,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,Y,"Inner bay was held to mitigation success criteria, but because the outer bay was wapparently extra, they don't evaluate for meeting of success criteria. 
""Eelgrass was harvested by hand and processed into planting units of 8_10 turions (leaf_shoots) per. These planting units were processed the same day that harvesting was completed and were planted within 24 hours of unit preparation. Harvesting and planting were accomplished by SCUBA divers, planting each unit on 1_meter centers within the three Inner Harbor transplant sites and reduced densities of an intended 1.5_meter centers for the two outer harbor sites. Because the Outer Harbor sites supported a number of small, unmappable seedlings, plantings were omitted where natural seedlings occurred in order to optimize the planting area. This resulted in an average density of 1.9_ meter centers within the planting zone. Planting was completed with variable unit counts and planting unit spacing as indicated in Table 1.""",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,They measure plant height and ephiphytic loading,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
JZG_AnaheimBay,JZG_AnaheimBay_OuterHarbor_Area1,AnaheimBay_OuterHarbor_Area1_6mo,Grey literature,"Merkel & Associates, Inc.",Huntington Harbor,33¡ 44.104Õ N; _118¡ 5.88Õ (Lat; Long. decimal minutes),33.73,-118.08,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,The transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom. Eelgrass was harvested by hand and processed into planting units of 8_10 turions (leaf_shoots) per unit planting units were processed the same day that harvesting was completed and were planted within 24 hours of unit preparation. Planting was completed with variable unit counts and planting unit spacing as indicated in Table 1.,NA,Y,"""Eelgrass was harvested from natural donor beds within the inner and outer harbors of Anaheim Bay, as
well as from the nearby Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve, where less than 10% of the bed was harvested.
Due to sparse occurrence of eelgrass within on_site donor beds as a result of early seasonal regrowth,
adequate material could not be harvested on_site and still meet the California Department of Fish &
Wildlife 10 percent harvest limitations within the aquatic plant transplant letter of approval. For this
reason, expansion of harvest areas was requested from the Department of Fish & Wildlife and was
approved after the first day of work. Because the restored eelgrass within the Bolsa Chica Ecological
Reserve originated partially from Anaheim Bay, it was identified as the logical candidate as a
supplemental donor site to meet the eelgrass volume requirements in a timely fashion.""",ND,6899,ND,ND,97.6,34,ND,ND,NA,2012,April-May,Spring,2,"0, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48",6,4.82,ND,NA,ND,ND,5600-7000,2116,702,4.21,51.2,33.6,ND,ND,SCEMP,NA,NA,"Inner bay was held to mitigation success criteria, but because the outer bay was wapparently extra, they don't evaluate for meeting of success criteria. 
""Eelgrass was harvested by hand and processed into planting units of 8_10 turions (leaf_shoots) per. These planting units were processed the same day that harvesting was completed and were planted within 24 hours of unit preparation. Harvesting and planting were accomplished by SCUBA divers, planting each unit on 1_meter centers within the three Inner Harbor transplant sites and reduced densities of an intended 1.5_meter centers for the two outer harbor sites. Because the Outer Harbor sites supported a number of small, unmappable seedlings, plantings were omitted where natural seedlings occurred in order to optimize the planting area. This resulted in an average density of 1.9_ meter centers within the planting zone. Planting was completed with variable unit counts and planting unit spacing as indicated in Table 1.""",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,They measure plant height and ephiphytic loading,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
JZG_AnaheimBay,JZG_AnaheimBay_OuterHarbor_Area1,AnaheimBay_OuterHarbor_Area1_12mo,Grey literature,"Merkel & Associates, Inc.",Huntington Harbor,33¡ 44.104Õ N; _118¡ 5.88Õ (Lat; Long. decimal minutes),33.73,-118.08,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,The transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom. Eelgrass was harvested by hand and processed into planting units of 8_10 turions (leaf_shoots) per unit planting units were processed the same day that harvesting was completed and were planted within 24 hours of unit preparation. Planting was completed with variable unit counts and planting unit spacing as indicated in Table 1.,NA,Y,"""Eelgrass was harvested from natural donor beds within the inner and outer harbors of Anaheim Bay, as
well as from the nearby Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve, where less than 10% of the bed was harvested.
Due to sparse occurrence of eelgrass within on_site donor beds as a result of early seasonal regrowth,
adequate material could not be harvested on_site and still meet the California Department of Fish &
Wildlife 10 percent harvest limitations within the aquatic plant transplant letter of approval. For this
reason, expansion of harvest areas was requested from the Department of Fish & Wildlife and was
approved after the first day of work. Because the restored eelgrass within the Bolsa Chica Ecological
Reserve originated partially from Anaheim Bay, it was identified as the logical candidate as a
supplemental donor site to meet the eelgrass volume requirements in a timely fashion.""",ND,8511,ND,ND,181.6,64.7,ND,ND,NA,2012,April-May,Spring,2,"0, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48",12,4.82,ND,NA,ND,ND,5600-7000,2116,1286,4.21,94.4,47.4,ND,ND,SCEMP,NA,NA,"Inner bay was held to mitigation success criteria, but because the outer bay was wapparently extra, they don't evaluate for meeting of success criteria. 
""Eelgrass was harvested by hand and processed into planting units of 8_10 turions (leaf_shoots) per. These planting units were processed the same day that harvesting was completed and were planted within 24 hours of unit preparation. Harvesting and planting were accomplished by SCUBA divers, planting each unit on 1_meter centers within the three Inner Harbor transplant sites and reduced densities of an intended 1.5_meter centers for the two outer harbor sites. Because the Outer Harbor sites supported a number of small, unmappable seedlings, plantings were omitted where natural seedlings occurred in order to optimize the planting area. This resulted in an average density of 1.9_ meter centers within the planting zone. Planting was completed with variable unit counts and planting unit spacing as indicated in Table 1.""",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,They measure plant height and ephiphytic loading,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
JZG_AnaheimBay,JZG_AnaheimBay_OuterHarbor_Area1,AnaheimBay_OuterHarbor_Area1_24mo,Grey literature,"Merkel & Associates, Inc.",Huntington Harbor,33¡ 44.104Õ N; _118¡ 5.88Õ (Lat; Long. decimal minutes),33.73,-118.08,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,The transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom. Eelgrass was harvested by hand and processed into planting units of 8_10 turions (leaf_shoots) per unit planting units were processed the same day that harvesting was completed and were planted within 24 hours of unit preparation. Planting was completed with variable unit counts and planting unit spacing as indicated in Table 1.,NA,Y,"""Eelgrass was harvested from natural donor beds within the inner and outer harbors of Anaheim Bay, as
well as from the nearby Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve, where less than 10% of the bed was harvested.
Due to sparse occurrence of eelgrass within on_site donor beds as a result of early seasonal regrowth,
adequate material could not be harvested on_site and still meet the California Department of Fish &
Wildlife 10 percent harvest limitations within the aquatic plant transplant letter of approval. For this
reason, expansion of harvest areas was requested from the Department of Fish & Wildlife and was
approved after the first day of work. Because the restored eelgrass within the Bolsa Chica Ecological
Reserve originated partially from Anaheim Bay, it was identified as the logical candidate as a
supplemental donor site to meet the eelgrass volume requirements in a timely fashion.""",ND,10588,ND,ND,461.6,79.1,ND,ND,NA,2012,April-May,Spring,2,"0, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48",24,4.82,ND,NA,ND,ND,5600-7000,2116,1617,4.21,276.8,76.64,ND,ND,SCEMP,NA,NA,"Inner bay was held to mitigation success criteria, but because the outer bay was wapparently extra, they don't evaluate for meeting of success criteria. 
""Eelgrass was harvested by hand and processed into planting units of 8_10 turions (leaf_shoots) per. These planting units were processed the same day that harvesting was completed and were planted within 24 hours of unit preparation. Harvesting and planting were accomplished by SCUBA divers, planting each unit on 1_meter centers within the three Inner Harbor transplant sites and reduced densities of an intended 1.5_meter centers for the two outer harbor sites. Because the Outer Harbor sites supported a number of small, unmappable seedlings, plantings were omitted where natural seedlings occurred in order to optimize the planting area. This resulted in an average density of 1.9_ meter centers within the planting zone. Planting was completed with variable unit counts and planting unit spacing as indicated in Table 1.""",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,They measure plant height and ephiphytic loading,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
JZG_AnaheimBay,JZG_AnaheimBay_OuterHarbor_Area1,AnaheimBay_OuterHarbor_Area1_36mo,Grey literature,"Merkel & Associates, Inc.",Huntington Harbor,33¡ 44.104Õ N; _118¡ 5.88Õ (Lat; Long. decimal minutes),33.73,-118.08,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,The transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom. Eelgrass was harvested by hand and processed into planting units of 8_10 turions (leaf_shoots) per unit planting units were processed the same day that harvesting was completed and were planted within 24 hours of unit preparation. Planting was completed with variable unit counts and planting unit spacing as indicated in Table 1.,NA,Y,"""Eelgrass was harvested from natural donor beds within the inner and outer harbors of Anaheim Bay, as
well as from the nearby Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve, where less than 10% of the bed was harvested.
Due to sparse occurrence of eelgrass within on_site donor beds as a result of early seasonal regrowth,
adequate material could not be harvested on_site and still meet the California Department of Fish &
Wildlife 10 percent harvest limitations within the aquatic plant transplant letter of approval. For this
reason, expansion of harvest areas was requested from the Department of Fish & Wildlife and was
approved after the first day of work. Because the restored eelgrass within the Bolsa Chica Ecological
Reserve originated partially from Anaheim Bay, it was identified as the logical candidate as a
supplemental donor site to meet the eelgrass volume requirements in a timely fashion.""",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,2012,April-May,Spring,2,"0, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48",36,4.82,ND,NA,ND,ND,5600-7000,2116,ND,4.21,ND,ND,ND,ND,SCEMP,NA,NA,"Inner bay was held to mitigation success criteria, but because the outer bay was wapparently extra, they don't evaluate for meeting of success criteria. 
""Eelgrass was harvested by hand and processed into planting units of 8_10 turions (leaf_shoots) per. These planting units were processed the same day that harvesting was completed and were planted within 24 hours of unit preparation. Harvesting and planting were accomplished by SCUBA divers, planting each unit on 1_meter centers within the three Inner Harbor transplant sites and reduced densities of an intended 1.5_meter centers for the two outer harbor sites. Because the Outer Harbor sites supported a number of small, unmappable seedlings, plantings were omitted where natural seedlings occurred in order to optimize the planting area. This resulted in an average density of 1.9_ meter centers within the planting zone. Planting was completed with variable unit counts and planting unit spacing as indicated in Table 1.""",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,They measure plant height and ephiphytic loading,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
JZG_AnaheimBay,JZG_AnaheimBay_OuterHarbor_Area1,AnaheimBay_OuterHarbor_Area1_48mo,Grey literature,"Merkel & Associates, Inc.",Huntington Harbor,33¡ 44.104Õ N; _118¡ 5.88Õ (Lat; Long. decimal minutes),33.73,-118.08,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,The transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom. Eelgrass was harvested by hand and processed into planting units of 8_10 turions (leaf_shoots) per unit planting units were processed the same day that harvesting was completed and were planted within 24 hours of unit preparation. Planting was completed with variable unit counts and planting unit spacing as indicated in Table 1.,NA,Y,"""Eelgrass was harvested from natural donor beds within the inner and outer harbors of Anaheim Bay, as
well as from the nearby Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve, where less than 10% of the bed was harvested.
Due to sparse occurrence of eelgrass within on_site donor beds as a result of early seasonal regrowth,
adequate material could not be harvested on_site and still meet the California Department of Fish &
Wildlife 10 percent harvest limitations within the aquatic plant transplant letter of approval. For this
reason, expansion of harvest areas was requested from the Department of Fish & Wildlife and was
approved after the first day of work. Because the restored eelgrass within the Bolsa Chica Ecological
Reserve originated partially from Anaheim Bay, it was identified as the logical candidate as a
supplemental donor site to meet the eelgrass volume requirements in a timely fashion.""",ND,7253,ND,ND,144,84.7,ND,ND,NA,2012,April-May,Spring,2,"0, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48",48,4.82,ND,NA,ND,ND,5600-7000,2116,1270,4.21,206.4,80.7,ND,ND,SCEMP,NA,NA,"Inner bay was held to mitigation success criteria, but because the outer bay was wapparently extra, they don't evaluate for meeting of success criteria. 
""Eelgrass was harvested by hand and processed into planting units of 8_10 turions (leaf_shoots) per. These planting units were processed the same day that harvesting was completed and were planted within 24 hours of unit preparation. Harvesting and planting were accomplished by SCUBA divers, planting each unit on 1_meter centers within the three Inner Harbor transplant sites and reduced densities of an intended 1.5_meter centers for the two outer harbor sites. Because the Outer Harbor sites supported a number of small, unmappable seedlings, plantings were omitted where natural seedlings occurred in order to optimize the planting area. This resulted in an average density of 1.9_ meter centers within the planting zone. Planting was completed with variable unit counts and planting unit spacing as indicated in Table 1.""",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,They measure plant height and ephiphytic loading,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
JZG_AnaheimBay,JZG_AnaheimBay_OuterHarbor_Area2,AnaheimBay_OuterHarbor_Area2_6mo,Grey literature,"Merkel & Associates, Inc.",Huntington Harbor,33¡ 44.104Õ N; _118¡ 5.88Õ (Lat; Long. decimal minutes),33.73,-118.08,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,The transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom. Eelgrass was harvested by hand and processed into planting units of 8_10 turions (leaf_shoots) per unit planting units were processed the same day that harvesting was completed and were planted within 24 hours of unit preparation. Planting was completed with variable unit counts and planting unit spacing as indicated in Table 1.,NA,Y,"""Eelgrass was harvested from natural donor beds within the inner and outer harbors of Anaheim Bay, as well as from the nearby Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve, where less than 10% of the bed was harvested. Due to sparse occurrence of eelgrass within on_site donor beds as a result of early seasonal regrowth, adequate material could not be harvested on_site and still meet the California Department of Fish & Wildlife 10 percent harvest limitations within the aquatic plant transplant letter of approval. For this reason, expansion of harvest areas was requested from the Department of Fish & Wildlife and was approved after the first day of work. Because the restored eelgrass within the Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve originated partially from Anaheim Bay, it was identified as the logical candidate as a supplemental donor site to meet the eelgrass volume requirements in a timely fashion.""",ND,6899,ND,ND,97.6,34,ND,ND,NA,2012,April-May,Spring,2,"0, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48",6,4.82,ND,NA,ND,ND,7400-9250,3433,537,4.21,59.2,33,ND,ND,SCEMP,NA,NA,"Inner bay was held to mitigation success criteria, but because the outer bay was wapparently extra, they don't evaluate for meeting of success criteria. 
""Eelgrass was harvested by hand and processed into planting units of 8_10 turions (leaf_shoots) per. These planting units were processed the same day that harvesting was completed and were planted within 24 hours of unit preparation. Harvesting and planting were accomplished by SCUBA divers, planting each unit on 1_meter centers within the three Inner Harbor transplant sites and reduced densities of an intended 1.5_meter centers for the two outer harbor sites. Because the Outer Harbor sites supported a number of small, unmappable seedlings, plantings were omitted where natural seedlings occurred in order to optimize the planting area. This resulted in an average density of 1.9_ meter centers within the planting zone. Planting was completed with variable unit counts and planting unit spacing as indicated in Table 1.""",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,They measure plant height and ephiphytic loading,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
JZG_AnaheimBay,JZG_AnaheimBay_OuterHarbor_Area2,AnaheimBay_OuterHarbor_Area2_12mo,Grey literature,"Merkel & Associates, Inc.",Huntington Harbor,33¡ 44.104Õ N; _118¡ 5.88Õ (Lat; Long. decimal minutes),33.73,-118.08,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,The transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom. Eelgrass was harvested by hand and processed into planting units of 8_10 turions (leaf_shoots) per unit planting units were processed the same day that harvesting was completed and were planted within 24 hours of unit preparation. Planting was completed with variable unit counts and planting unit spacing as indicated in Table 1.,NA,Y,"""Eelgrass was harvested from natural donor beds within the inner and outer harbors of Anaheim Bay, as well as from the nearby Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve, where less than 10% of the bed was harvested. Due to sparse occurrence of eelgrass within on_site donor beds as a result of early seasonal regrowth, adequate material could not be harvested on_site and still meet the California Department of Fish & Wildlife 10 percent harvest limitations within the aquatic plant transplant letter of approval. For this reason, expansion of harvest areas was requested from the Department of Fish & Wildlife and was approved after the first day of work. Because the restored eelgrass within the Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve originated partially from Anaheim Bay, it was identified as the logical candidate as a supplemental donor site to meet the eelgrass volume requirements in a timely fashion.""",ND,8511,ND,ND,181.6,64.7,ND,ND,NA,2012,April-May,Spring,2,"0, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48",12,4.82,ND,NA,ND,ND,7400-9250,3433,1176,4.21,131.2,56.3,ND,ND,SCEMP,NA,NA,"Inner bay was held to mitigation success criteria, but because the outer bay was wapparently extra, they don't evaluate for meeting of success criteria. 
""Eelgrass was harvested by hand and processed into planting units of 8_10 turions (leaf_shoots) per. These planting units were processed the same day that harvesting was completed and were planted within 24 hours of unit preparation. Harvesting and planting were accomplished by SCUBA divers, planting each unit on 1_meter centers within the three Inner Harbor transplant sites and reduced densities of an intended 1.5_meter centers for the two outer harbor sites. Because the Outer Harbor sites supported a number of small, unmappable seedlings, plantings were omitted where natural seedlings occurred in order to optimize the planting area. This resulted in an average density of 1.9_ meter centers within the planting zone. Planting was completed with variable unit counts and planting unit spacing as indicated in Table 1.""",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,They measure plant height and ephiphytic loading,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
JZG_AnaheimBay,JZG_AnaheimBay_OuterHarbor_Area2,AnaheimBay_OuterHarbor_Area2_24mo,Grey literature,"Merkel & Associates, Inc.",Huntington Harbor,33¡ 44.104Õ N; _118¡ 5.88Õ (Lat; Long. decimal minutes),33.73,-118.08,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,The transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom. Eelgrass was harvested by hand and processed into planting units of 8_10 turions (leaf_shoots) per unit planting units were processed the same day that harvesting was completed and were planted within 24 hours of unit preparation. Planting was completed with variable unit counts and planting unit spacing as indicated in Table 1.,NA,Y,"""Eelgrass was harvested from natural donor beds within the inner and outer harbors of Anaheim Bay, as well as from the nearby Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve, where less than 10% of the bed was harvested. Due to sparse occurrence of eelgrass within on_site donor beds as a result of early seasonal regrowth, adequate material could not be harvested on_site and still meet the California Department of Fish & Wildlife 10 percent harvest limitations within the aquatic plant transplant letter of approval. For this reason, expansion of harvest areas was requested from the Department of Fish & Wildlife and was approved after the first day of work. Because the restored eelgrass within the Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve originated partially from Anaheim Bay, it was identified as the logical candidate as a supplemental donor site to meet the eelgrass volume requirements in a timely fashion.""",ND,10588,ND,ND,461.6,79.1,ND,ND,NA,2012,April-May,Spring,2,"0, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48",24,4.82,ND,NA,ND,ND,7400-9250,3433,1609,4.21,438.4,115.4,ND,ND,SCEMP,NA,NA,"Inner bay was held to mitigation success criteria, but because the outer bay was wapparently extra, they don't evaluate for meeting of success criteria. 
""Eelgrass was harvested by hand and processed into planting units of 8_10 turions (leaf_shoots) per. These planting units were processed the same day that harvesting was completed and were planted within 24 hours of unit preparation. Harvesting and planting were accomplished by SCUBA divers, planting each unit on 1_meter centers within the three Inner Harbor transplant sites and reduced densities of an intended 1.5_meter centers for the two outer harbor sites. Because the Outer Harbor sites supported a number of small, unmappable seedlings, plantings were omitted where natural seedlings occurred in order to optimize the planting area. This resulted in an average density of 1.9_ meter centers within the planting zone. Planting was completed with variable unit counts and planting unit spacing as indicated in Table 1.""",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,They measure plant height and ephiphytic loading,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
JZG_AnaheimBay,JZG_AnaheimBay_OuterHarbor_Area2,AnaheimBay_OuterHarbor_Area2_36mo,Grey literature,"Merkel & Associates, Inc.",Huntington Harbor,33¡ 44.104Õ N; _118¡ 5.88Õ (Lat; Long. decimal minutes),33.73,-118.08,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,The transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom. Eelgrass was harvested by hand and processed into planting units of 8_10 turions (leaf_shoots) per unit planting units were processed the same day that harvesting was completed and were planted within 24 hours of unit preparation. Planting was completed with variable unit counts and planting unit spacing as indicated in Table 1.,NA,Y,"""Eelgrass was harvested from natural donor beds within the inner and outer harbors of Anaheim Bay, as well as from the nearby Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve, where less than 10% of the bed was harvested. Due to sparse occurrence of eelgrass within on_site donor beds as a result of early seasonal regrowth, adequate material could not be harvested on_site and still meet the California Department of Fish & Wildlife 10 percent harvest limitations within the aquatic plant transplant letter of approval. For this reason, expansion of harvest areas was requested from the Department of Fish & Wildlife and was approved after the first day of work. Because the restored eelgrass within the Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve originated partially from Anaheim Bay, it was identified as the logical candidate as a supplemental donor site to meet the eelgrass volume requirements in a timely fashion.""",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,2012,April-May,Spring,2,"0, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48",36,4.82,ND,NA,ND,ND,7400-9250,3433,ND,4.21,ND,ND,ND,ND,SCEMP,NA,NA,"Inner bay was held to mitigation success criteria, but because the outer bay was wapparently extra, they don't evaluate for meeting of success criteria. 
""Eelgrass was harvested by hand and processed into planting units of 8_10 turions (leaf_shoots) per. These planting units were processed the same day that harvesting was completed and were planted within 24 hours of unit preparation. Harvesting and planting were accomplished by SCUBA divers, planting each unit on 1_meter centers within the three Inner Harbor transplant sites and reduced densities of an intended 1.5_meter centers for the two outer harbor sites. Because the Outer Harbor sites supported a number of small, unmappable seedlings, plantings were omitted where natural seedlings occurred in order to optimize the planting area. This resulted in an average density of 1.9_ meter centers within the planting zone. Planting was completed with variable unit counts and planting unit spacing as indicated in Table 1.""",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,They measure plant height and ephiphytic loading,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
JZG_AnaheimBay,JZG_AnaheimBay_OuterHarbor_Area2,AnaheimBay_OuterHarbor_Area2_48mo,Grey literature,"Merkel & Associates, Inc.",Huntington Harbor,33¡ 44.104Õ N; _118¡ 5.88Õ (Lat; Long. decimal minutes),33.73,-118.08,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,The transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom. Eelgrass was harvested by hand and processed into planting units of 8_10 turions (leaf_shoots) per unit planting units were processed the same day that harvesting was completed and were planted within 24 hours of unit preparation. Planting was completed with variable unit counts and planting unit spacing as indicated in Table 1.,NA,Y,"""Eelgrass was harvested from natural donor beds within the inner and outer harbors of Anaheim Bay, as well as from the nearby Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve, where less than 10% of the bed was harvested. Due to sparse occurrence of eelgrass within on_site donor beds as a result of early seasonal regrowth, adequate material could not be harvested on_site and still meet the California Department of Fish & Wildlife 10 percent harvest limitations within the aquatic plant transplant letter of approval. For this reason, expansion of harvest areas was requested from the Department of Fish & Wildlife and was approved after the first day of work. Because the restored eelgrass within the Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve originated partially from Anaheim Bay, it was identified as the logical candidate as a supplemental donor site to meet the eelgrass volume requirements in a timely fashion.""",ND,7253,ND,ND,144,84.7,ND,ND,NA,2012,April-May,Spring,2,"0, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48",48,4.82,ND,NA,ND,ND,7400-9250,3433,662,4.21,161.6,67.2,ND,ND,SCEMP,NA,NA,"Inner bay was held to mitigation success criteria, but because the outer bay was wapparently extra, they don't evaluate for meeting of success criteria. 
""Eelgrass was harvested by hand and processed into planting units of 8_10 turions (leaf_shoots) per. These planting units were processed the same day that harvesting was completed and were planted within 24 hours of unit preparation. Harvesting and planting were accomplished by SCUBA divers, planting each unit on 1_meter centers within the three Inner Harbor transplant sites and reduced densities of an intended 1.5_meter centers for the two outer harbor sites. Because the Outer Harbor sites supported a number of small, unmappable seedlings, plantings were omitted where natural seedlings occurred in order to optimize the planting area. This resulted in an average density of 1.9_ meter centers within the planting zone. Planting was completed with variable unit counts and planting unit spacing as indicated in Table 1.""",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,They measure plant height and ephiphytic loading,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
JZG_Sweetwater_Merkel,JZG_Sweetwater_Merkel_Plot1of1,Sweetwater_Merkel_Plot1of1_3mo,Grey literature,"Merkel & Associates, Inc.",San Diego Bay,"""at the site of the SDG&E 138 kV Horizontal Directional Drilling (HDD) Project at the Sweetwater Marsh, Chula Vista, California""",32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,Biodegradable soft anchors,NA,Y,NA,316,314,533,ND,335.3,76.4,ND,ND,NA,2008,July,Summer,4,"0, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48",3,1,ND,ND,32¼ 40Õ 49.06Ó N,117¼ 10Õ 30.79Ó W,NA,99.6,94,69.1,150.5,72.5,ND,ND,SCEMP,NA,NA,ND,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
JZG_Sweetwater_Merkel,JZG_Sweetwater_Merkel_Plot1of1,Sweetwater_Merkel_Plot1of1_6mo,Grey literature,"Merkel & Associates, Inc.",San Diego Bay,"""at the site of the SDG&E 138 kV Horizontal Directional Drilling (HDD) Project at the Sweetwater Marsh, Chula Vista, California""",32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,Biodegradable soft anchors,NA,Y,NA,316,405,533,ND,227.2,ND,ND,ND,NA,2008,July,Summer,4,"0, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48",6,1,ND,ND,32¼ 40Õ 49.06Ó N,117¼ 10Õ 30.79Ó W,NA,99.6,99.6,69.1,230.4,87.4,ND,ND,SCEMP,NA,NA,ND,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
JZG_Sweetwater_Merkel,JZG_Sweetwater_Merkel_Plot1of1,Sweetwater_Merkel_Plot1of1_12mo,Grey literature,"Merkel & Associates, Inc.",San Diego Bay,"""at the site of the SDG&E 138 kV Horizontal Directional Drilling (HDD) Project at the Sweetwater Marsh, Chula Vista, California""",32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,Biodegradable soft anchors,NA,Y,NA,316,377,533,ND,382.4,ND,ND,ND,NA,2008,July,Summer,4,"0, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48",12,1,ND,ND,32¼ 40Õ 49.06Ó N,117¼ 10Õ 30.79Ó W,NA,99.6,96,69.1,531.2,224.5,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,Y,ND,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
JZG_Sweetwater_Merkel,JZG_Sweetwater_Merkel_Plot1of1,Sweetwater_Merkel_Plot1of1_24mo,Grey literature,"Merkel & Associates, Inc.",San Diego Bay,"""at the site of the SDG&E 138 kV Horizontal Directional Drilling (HDD) Project at the Sweetwater Marsh, Chula Vista, California""",32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,Biodegradable soft anchors,NA,Y,NA,316,376,533,ND,948.8,ND,ND,ND,NA,2008,July,Summer,4,"0, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48",24,1,ND,ND,32¼ 40Õ 49.06Ó N,117¼ 10Õ 30.79Ó W,NA,99.6,97.3,69.1,851.2,212,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,Y,ND,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
JZG_Sweetwater_Merkel,JZG_Sweetwater_Merkel_Plot1of1,Sweetwater_Merkel_Plot1of1_36mo,Grey literature,"Merkel & Associates, Inc.",San Diego Bay,"""at the site of the SDG&E 138 kV Horizontal Directional Drilling (HDD) Project at the Sweetwater Marsh, Chula Vista, California""",32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,Biodegradable soft anchors,NA,Y,NA,316,345,533,ND,816,196.8,ND,ND,NA,2008,July,Summer,4,"0, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48",36,1,ND,ND,32¼ 40Õ 49.06Ó N,117¼ 10Õ 30.79Ó W,NA,99.6,98.9,69.1,689.6,99.6,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,Y,ND,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
JZG_Sweetwater_Merkel,JZG_Sweetwater_Merkel_Plot1of1,Sweetwater_Merkel_Plot1of1_48mo,Grey literature,"Merkel & Associates, Inc.",San Diego Bay,"""at the site of the SDG&E 138 kV Horizontal Directional Drilling (HDD) Project at the Sweetwater Marsh, Chula Vista, California""",32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,Biodegradable soft anchors,NA,Y,NA,316,329.5,533,ND,225.6,136.1,ND,ND,NA,2008,July,Summer,4,"0, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48",48,1,ND,ND,32¼ 40Õ 49.06Ó N,117¼ 10Õ 30.79Ó W,NA,99.6,99.6,69.1,214.4,79.9,ND,ND,SCEMP,Y,Y,ND,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MB_Merkel_2018,MB_Merkel_2018_MA1,MB_Merkel_2018_MA1_6mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Assocites,Mission Bay,ND,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,""" The bareroot transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom""",NA,Y,"Donor eelgrass for the transplant was derived from eelgrass beds identified throughout Mission Bay. Multiple donor sites were employed in the transplant due both to the large scale of the transplant and the desire to ensure transplants reflected a high diversity of donor eelgrass material within the restored beds. During the transplant, additional donor sites from those initially identified had to be added due to significant losses of donor beds due to wasting disease between the time donor sites were identified in summer 2017 and transplants commenced in spring 2018.",2792,1437,67.6,ND,56,ND,ND,ND,"Ref data from Sail Bay Ref-2 (Fig. 4b) - There were eight total reference areas. In this case, the ref area closest in distance to the restoration area was selected. ",2018,May-June,Spring/Summer,2,"0, 6, 12, 24",6,3.17,ND,"Listed as ""height"" - I am fairly positive this is depth based onthe way reported (eg Table 3) but not 100% sure",ND,ND,1750000,12181,4049,6,59.2,ND,ND,ND,CEMP defined criteria ,N,Y,"total planted units: 250,000 units (6-8 plants per unit)",Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Y, epiphytic load","There was a red tide they note led to declines. Also, ""This dramatic decline from initial planting was related to a rapid spread of wasting disease in the bay as is discussed and documented in project's PEP Recommendations Memo (M&A 2018b). Wasting disease had commenced spreading in Mission Bay prior to commencement of dredging and continued throughout the summer of 2018""",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MB_Merkel_2018,MB_Merkel_2018_MA1,MB_Merkel_2018_MA1_12mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Assocites,Mission Bay,ND,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,""" The bareroot transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom""",NA,Y,"Donor eelgrass for the transplant was derived from eelgrass beds identified throughout Mission Bay. Multiple donor sites were employed in the transplant due both to the large scale of the transplant and the desire to ensure transplants reflected a high diversity of donor eelgrass material within the restored beds. During the transplant, additional donor sites from those initially identified had to be added due to significant losses of donor beds due to wasting disease between the time donor sites were identified in summer 2017 and transplants commenced in spring 2018.",2792,2768,67.6,ND,52.8,ND,ND,ND,"Ref data from Sail Bay Ref-2 (Fig. 4b) - There were eight total reference areas. In this case, the ref area closest in distance to the restoration area was selected. ",2018,May-June,Spring/Summer,2,"0, 6, 12, 24",12,3.17,ND,"Listed as ""height"" - I am fairly positive this is depth based onthe way reported (eg Table 3) but not 100% sure",ND,ND,1750000,12181,11630,6,67.2,ND,ND,ND,CEMP defined criteria ,N,Y,"total planted units: 250,000 units (6-8 plants per unit)",Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Y, epiphytic load","There was a red tide they note led to declines. Also, ""This dramatic decline from initial planting was related to a rapid spread of wasting disease in the bay as is discussed and documented in project's PEP Recommendations Memo (M&A 2018b). Wasting disease had commenced spreading in Mission Bay prior to commencement of dredging and continued throughout the summer of 2018""",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MB_Merkel_2018,MB_Merkel_2018_MA1,MB_Merkel_2018_MA1_24mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Assocites,Mission Bay,ND,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,""" The bareroot transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom""",NA,Y,"Donor eelgrass for the transplant was derived from eelgrass beds identified throughout Mission Bay. Multiple donor sites were employed in the transplant due both to the large scale of the transplant and the desire to ensure transplants reflected a high diversity of donor eelgrass material within the restored beds. During the transplant, additional donor sites from those initially identified had to be added due to significant losses of donor beds due to wasting disease between the time donor sites were identified in summer 2017 and transplants commenced in spring 2018.",2792,486,67.6,ND,49.6,21.9,ND,13.3,"Ref data from Sail Bay Ref-2 (Fig. 4b) - There were eight total reference areas. In this case, the ref area closest in distance to the restoration area was selected. ",2018,May-June,Spring/Summer,2,"0, 6, 12, 24",24,3.17,ND,"Listed as ""height"" - I am fairly positive this is depth based onthe way reported (eg Table 3) but not 100% sure",ND,ND,1750000,12181,2947,6,38.4,24.1,ND,50,CEMP defined criteria ,Y,Y,"total planted units: 250,000 units (6-8 plants per unit)",Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Y, epiphytic load","There was a red tide they note led to declines. Also, ""This dramatic decline from initial planting was related to a rapid spread of wasting disease in the bay as is discussed and documented in project's PEP Recommendations Memo (M&A 2018b). Wasting disease had commenced spreading in Mission Bay prior to commencement of dredging and continued throughout the summer of 2018""",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MB_Merkel_2018,MB_Merkel_2018_MA2,MB_Merkel_2018_MA2_6mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Assocites,Mission Bay,ND,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,""" The bareroot transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom""",NA,Y,"Donor eelgrass for the transplant was derived from eelgrass beds identified throughout Mission Bay. Multiple donor sites were employed in the transplant due both to the large scale of the transplant and the desire to ensure transplants reflected a high diversity of donor eelgrass material within the restored beds. During the transplant, additional donor sites from those initially identified had to be added due to significant losses of donor beds due to wasting disease between the time donor sites were identified in summer 2017 and transplants commenced in spring 2018.",2792,1437,67.6,ND,56,ND,ND,ND,"Ref data from Sail Bay Ref-2 (Fig. 4b) - There were eight total reference areas. In this case, the ref area closest in distance to the restoration area was selected. ",2018,May-June,Spring/Summer,2,"0, 6, 12, 24",6,3.17,ND,"Listed as ""height"" - I am fairly positive this is depth based onthe way reported (eg Table 3) but not 100% sure",ND,ND,1750000,1214,742,6,51.2,ND,ND,ND,CEMP defined criteria ,N,Y,"total planted units: 250,000 units (6-8 plants per unit)",Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Y, epiphytic load","There was a red tide they note led to declines. Also, ""This dramatic decline from initial planting was related to a rapid spread of wasting disease in the bay as is discussed and documented in project's PEP Recommendations Memo (M&A 2018b). Wasting disease had commenced spreading in Mission Bay prior to commencement of dredging and continued throughout the summer of 2018""",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MB_Merkel_2018,MB_Merkel_2018_MA2,MB_Merkel_2018_MA2_12mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Assocites,Mission Bay,ND,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,""" The bareroot transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom""",NA,Y,"Donor eelgrass for the transplant was derived from eelgrass beds identified throughout Mission Bay. Multiple donor sites were employed in the transplant due both to the large scale of the transplant and the desire to ensure transplants reflected a high diversity of donor eelgrass material within the restored beds. During the transplant, additional donor sites from those initially identified had to be added due to significant losses of donor beds due to wasting disease between the time donor sites were identified in summer 2017 and transplants commenced in spring 2018.",2792,2768,67.6,ND,52.8,ND,ND,ND,"Ref data from Sail Bay Ref-2 (Fig. 4b) - There were eight total reference areas. In this case, the ref area closest in distance to the restoration area was selected. ",2018,May-June,Spring/Summer,2,"0, 6, 12, 24",12,3.17,ND,"Listed as ""height"" - I am fairly positive this is depth based onthe way reported (eg Table 3) but not 100% sure",ND,ND,1750000,1214,2823,6,92.8,ND,ND,ND,CEMP defined criteria ,N,Y,"total planted units: 250,000 units (6-8 plants per unit)",Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Y, epiphytic load","There was a red tide they note led to declines. Also, ""This dramatic decline from initial planting was related to a rapid spread of wasting disease in the bay as is discussed and documented in project's PEP Recommendations Memo (M&A 2018b). Wasting disease had commenced spreading in Mission Bay prior to commencement of dredging and continued throughout the summer of 2018""",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MB_Merkel_2018,MB_Merkel_2018_MA2,MB_Merkel_2018_MA2_24mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Assocites,Mission Bay,ND,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,""" The bareroot transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom""",NA,Y,"Donor eelgrass for the transplant was derived from eelgrass beds identified throughout Mission Bay. Multiple donor sites were employed in the transplant due both to the large scale of the transplant and the desire to ensure transplants reflected a high diversity of donor eelgrass material within the restored beds. During the transplant, additional donor sites from those initially identified had to be added due to significant losses of donor beds due to wasting disease between the time donor sites were identified in summer 2017 and transplants commenced in spring 2018.",2792,486,67.6,ND,49.6,21.9,ND,13.3,"Ref data from Sail Bay Ref-2 (Fig. 4b) - There were eight total reference areas. In this case, the ref area closest in distance to the restoration area was selected. ",2018,May-June,Spring/Summer,2,"0, 6, 12, 24",24,3.17,ND,"Listed as ""height"" - I am fairly positive this is depth based onthe way reported (eg Table 3) but not 100% sure",ND,ND,1750000,1214,2914,6,41.6,24.1,ND,91.1,CEMP defined criteria ,Y,Y,"total planted units: 250,000 units (6-8 plants per unit)",Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Y, epiphytic load","There was a red tide they note led to declines. Also, ""This dramatic decline from initial planting was related to a rapid spread of wasting disease in the bay as is discussed and documented in project's PEP Recommendations Memo (M&A 2018b). Wasting disease had commenced spreading in Mission Bay prior to commencement of dredging and continued throughout the summer of 2018""",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MB_Merkel_2018,MB_Merkel_2018_MA3,MB_Merkel_2018_MA3_6mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Assocites,Mission Bay,ND,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,""" The bareroot transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom""",NA,Y,"Donor eelgrass for the transplant was derived from eelgrass beds identified throughout Mission Bay. Multiple donor sites were employed in the transplant due both to the large scale of the transplant and the desire to ensure transplants reflected a high diversity of donor eelgrass material within the restored beds. During the transplant, additional donor sites from those initially identified had to be added due to significant losses of donor beds due to wasting disease between the time donor sites were identified in summer 2017 and transplants commenced in spring 2018.",2792,1437,67.6,ND,56,ND,ND,ND,"Ref data from Sail Bay Ref-2 (Fig. 4b) - There were eight total reference areas. In this case, the ref area closest in distance to the restoration area was selected. ",2018,May-June,Spring/Summer,2,"0, 6, 12, 24",6,3.17,ND,"Listed as ""height"" - I am fairly positive this is depth based onthe way reported (eg Table 3) but not 100% sure",ND,ND,1750000,3278,1980,6,80,ND,ND,ND,CEMP defined criteria ,N,Y,"total planted units: 250,000 units (6-8 plants per unit)",Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Y, epiphytic load","There was a red tide they note led to declines. Also, ""This dramatic decline from initial planting was related to a rapid spread of wasting disease in the bay as is discussed and documented in project's PEP Recommendations Memo (M&A 2018b). Wasting disease had commenced spreading in Mission Bay prior to commencement of dredging and continued throughout the summer of 2018""",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MB_Merkel_2018,MB_Merkel_2018_MA3,MB_Merkel_2018_MA3_12mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Assocites,Mission Bay,ND,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,""" The bareroot transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom""",NA,Y,"Donor eelgrass for the transplant was derived from eelgrass beds identified throughout Mission Bay. Multiple donor sites were employed in the transplant due both to the large scale of the transplant and the desire to ensure transplants reflected a high diversity of donor eelgrass material within the restored beds. During the transplant, additional donor sites from those initially identified had to be added due to significant losses of donor beds due to wasting disease between the time donor sites were identified in summer 2017 and transplants commenced in spring 2018.",2792,2768,67.6,ND,52.8,ND,ND,ND,"Ref data from Sail Bay Ref-2 (Fig. 4b) - There were eight total reference areas. In this case, the ref area closest in distance to the restoration area was selected. ",2018,May-June,Spring/Summer,2,"0, 6, 12, 24",12,3.17,ND,"Listed as ""height"" - I am fairly positive this is depth based onthe way reported (eg Table 3) but not 100% sure",ND,ND,1750000,3278,948,6,86.4,ND,ND,ND,CEMP defined criteria ,N,Y,"total planted units: 250,000 units (6-8 plants per unit)",Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Y, epiphytic load","There was a red tide they note led to declines. Also, ""This dramatic decline from initial planting was related to a rapid spread of wasting disease in the bay as is discussed and documented in project's PEP Recommendations Memo (M&A 2018b). Wasting disease had commenced spreading in Mission Bay prior to commencement of dredging and continued throughout the summer of 2018""",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MB_Merkel_2018,MB_Merkel_2018_MA3,MB_Merkel_2018_MA3_24mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Assocites,Mission Bay,ND,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,""" The bareroot transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom""",NA,Y,"Donor eelgrass for the transplant was derived from eelgrass beds identified throughout Mission Bay. Multiple donor sites were employed in the transplant due both to the large scale of the transplant and the desire to ensure transplants reflected a high diversity of donor eelgrass material within the restored beds. During the transplant, additional donor sites from those initially identified had to be added due to significant losses of donor beds due to wasting disease between the time donor sites were identified in summer 2017 and transplants commenced in spring 2018.",2792,486,67.6,ND,49.6,21.9,ND,13.3,"Ref data from Sail Bay Ref-2 (Fig. 4b) - There were eight total reference areas. In this case, the ref area closest in distance to the restoration area was selected. ",2018,May-June,Spring/Summer,2,"0, 6, 12, 24",24,3.17,ND,"Listed as ""height"" - I am fairly positive this is depth based onthe way reported (eg Table 3) but not 100% sure",ND,ND,1750000,3278,121,6,25.6,11.2,ND,8.3,CEMP defined criteria ,Y,Y,"total planted units: 250,000 units (6-8 plants per unit)",Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Y, epiphytic load","There was a red tide they note led to declines. Also, ""This dramatic decline from initial planting was related to a rapid spread of wasting disease in the bay as is discussed and documented in project's PEP Recommendations Memo (M&A 2018b). Wasting disease had commenced spreading in Mission Bay prior to commencement of dredging and continued throughout the summer of 2018""",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MB_Merkel_2018,MB_Merkel_2018_MA4,MB_Merkel_2018_MA4_6mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Assocites,Mission Bay,ND,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,""" The bareroot transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom""",NA,Y,"Donor eelgrass for the transplant was derived from eelgrass beds identified throughout Mission Bay. Multiple donor sites were employed in the transplant due both to the large scale of the transplant and the desire to ensure transplants reflected a high diversity of donor eelgrass material within the restored beds. During the transplant, additional donor sites from those initially identified had to be added due to significant losses of donor beds due to wasting disease between the time donor sites were identified in summer 2017 and transplants commenced in spring 2018.",2792,1437,67.6,ND,56,ND,ND,ND,"Ref data from Sail Bay Ref-2 (Fig. 4b) - There were eight total reference areas. In this case, the ref area closest in distance to the restoration area was selected. ",2018,May-June,Spring/Summer,2,"0, 6, 12, 24",6,3.17,ND,"Listed as ""height"" - I am fairly positive this is depth based onthe way reported (eg Table 3) but not 100% sure",ND,ND,1750000,2711,210,6,214.4,ND,ND,ND,CEMP defined criteria ,N,Y,"total planted units: 250,000 units (6-8 plants per unit)",Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Y, epiphytic load","There was a red tide they note led to declines. Also, ""This dramatic decline from initial planting was related to a rapid spread of wasting disease in the bay as is discussed and documented in project's PEP Recommendations Memo (M&A 2018b). Wasting disease had commenced spreading in Mission Bay prior to commencement of dredging and continued throughout the summer of 2018""",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MB_Merkel_2018,MB_Merkel_2018_MA4,MB_Merkel_2018_MA4_12mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Assocites,Mission Bay,ND,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,""" The bareroot transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom""",NA,Y,"Donor eelgrass for the transplant was derived from eelgrass beds identified throughout Mission Bay. Multiple donor sites were employed in the transplant due both to the large scale of the transplant and the desire to ensure transplants reflected a high diversity of donor eelgrass material within the restored beds. During the transplant, additional donor sites from those initially identified had to be added due to significant losses of donor beds due to wasting disease between the time donor sites were identified in summer 2017 and transplants commenced in spring 2018.",2792,2768,67.6,ND,52.8,ND,ND,ND,"Ref data from Sail Bay Ref-2 (Fig. 4b) - There were eight total reference areas. In this case, the ref area closest in distance to the restoration area was selected. ",2018,May-June,Spring/Summer,2,"0, 6, 12, 24",12,3.17,ND,"Listed as ""height"" - I am fairly positive this is depth based onthe way reported (eg Table 3) but not 100% sure",ND,ND,1750000,2711,1972,6,64,ND,ND,ND,CEMP defined criteria ,N,Y,"total planted units: 250,000 units (6-8 plants per unit)",Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Y, epiphytic load","There was a red tide they note led to declines. Also, ""This dramatic decline from initial planting was related to a rapid spread of wasting disease in the bay as is discussed and documented in project's PEP Recommendations Memo (M&A 2018b). Wasting disease had commenced spreading in Mission Bay prior to commencement of dredging and continued throughout the summer of 2018""",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MB_Merkel_2018,MB_Merkel_2018_MA4,MB_Merkel_2018_MA4_24mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Assocites,Mission Bay,ND,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,""" The bareroot transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom""",NA,Y,"Donor eelgrass for the transplant was derived from eelgrass beds identified throughout Mission Bay. Multiple donor sites were employed in the transplant due both to the large scale of the transplant and the desire to ensure transplants reflected a high diversity of donor eelgrass material within the restored beds. During the transplant, additional donor sites from those initially identified had to be added due to significant losses of donor beds due to wasting disease between the time donor sites were identified in summer 2017 and transplants commenced in spring 2018.",2792,486,67.6,ND,49.6,21.9,ND,13.3,"Ref data from Sail Bay Ref-2 (Fig. 4b) - There were eight total reference areas. In this case, the ref area closest in distance to the restoration area was selected. ",2018,May-June,Spring/Summer,2,"0, 6, 12, 24",24,3.17,ND,"Listed as ""height"" - I am fairly positive this is depth based onthe way reported (eg Table 3) but not 100% sure",ND,ND,1750000,2711,3237,6,126.4,28.7,ND,100,CEMP defined criteria ,Y,Y,"total planted units: 250,000 units (6-8 plants per unit)",Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Y, epiphytic load","There was a red tide they note led to declines. Also, ""This dramatic decline from initial planting was related to a rapid spread of wasting disease in the bay as is discussed and documented in project's PEP Recommendations Memo (M&A 2018b). Wasting disease had commenced spreading in Mission Bay prior to commencement of dredging and continued throughout the summer of 2018""",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MB_Merkel_2018,MB_Merkel_2018_MA5,MB_Merkel_2018_MA5_6mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Assocites,Mission Bay,ND,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,""" The bareroot transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom""",NA,Y,"Donor eelgrass for the transplant was derived from eelgrass beds identified throughout Mission Bay. Multiple donor sites were employed in the transplant due both to the large scale of the transplant and the desire to ensure transplants reflected a high diversity of donor eelgrass material within the restored beds. During the transplant, additional donor sites from those initially identified had to be added due to significant losses of donor beds due to wasting disease between the time donor sites were identified in summer 2017 and transplants commenced in spring 2018.",3925,761,164.8,ND,75.6,ND,ND,ND,"Ref data from Ventura-Ref (Fig. 4c) - There were eight total reference areas. In this case, the ref area closest in distance to the restoration area was selected. ",2018,May-June,Spring/Summer,2,"0, 6, 12, 24",6,3.17,ND,"Listed as ""height"" - I am fairly positive this is depth based onthe way reported (eg Table 3) but not 100% sure",ND,ND,1750000,243,1282,6,52.8,ND,ND,ND,CEMP defined criteria ,N,Y,"total planted units: 250,000 units (6-8 plants per unit)",Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Y, epiphytic load","There was a red tide they note led to declines. Also, ""This dramatic decline from initial planting was related to a rapid spread of wasting disease in the bay as is discussed and documented in project's PEP Recommendations Memo (M&A 2018b). Wasting disease had commenced spreading in Mission Bay prior to commencement of dredging and continued throughout the summer of 2018""",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MB_Merkel_2018,MB_Merkel_2018_MA5,MB_Merkel_2018_MA5_12mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Assocites,Mission Bay,ND,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,""" The bareroot transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom""",NA,Y,"Donor eelgrass for the transplant was derived from eelgrass beds identified throughout Mission Bay. Multiple donor sites were employed in the transplant due both to the large scale of the transplant and the desire to ensure transplants reflected a high diversity of donor eelgrass material within the restored beds. During the transplant, additional donor sites from those initially identified had to be added due to significant losses of donor beds due to wasting disease between the time donor sites were identified in summer 2017 and transplants commenced in spring 2018.",3925,2070,164.8,ND,75.2,ND,ND,ND,"Ref data from Ventura-Ref (Fig. 4c) - There were eight total reference areas. In this case, the ref area closest in distance to the restoration area was selected. ",2018,May-June,Spring/Summer,2,"0, 6, 12, 24",12,3.17,ND,"Listed as ""height"" - I am fairly positive this is depth based onthe way reported (eg Table 3) but not 100% sure",ND,ND,1750000,243,4865,6,64,ND,ND,ND,CEMP defined criteria ,N,Y,"total planted units: 250,000 units (6-8 plants per unit)",Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Y, epiphytic load","There was a red tide they note led to declines. Also, ""This dramatic decline from initial planting was related to a rapid spread of wasting disease in the bay as is discussed and documented in project's PEP Recommendations Memo (M&A 2018b). Wasting disease had commenced spreading in Mission Bay prior to commencement of dredging and continued throughout the summer of 2018""",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MB_Merkel_2018,MB_Merkel_2018_MA5,MB_Merkel_2018_MA5_24mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Assocites,Mission Bay,ND,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,""" The bareroot transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom""",NA,Y,"Donor eelgrass for the transplant was derived from eelgrass beds identified throughout Mission Bay. Multiple donor sites were employed in the transplant due both to the large scale of the transplant and the desire to ensure transplants reflected a high diversity of donor eelgrass material within the restored beds. During the transplant, additional donor sites from those initially identified had to be added due to significant losses of donor beds due to wasting disease between the time donor sites were identified in summer 2017 and transplants commenced in spring 2018.",3925,283,164.8,ND,22.4,21.9,ND,9.7,"Ref data from Ventura-Ref (Fig. 4c) - There were eight total reference areas. In this case, the ref area closest in distance to the restoration area was selected. ",2018,May-June,Spring/Summer,2,"0, 6, 12, 24",24,3.17,ND,"Listed as ""height"" - I am fairly positive this is depth based onthe way reported (eg Table 3) but not 100% sure",ND,ND,1750000,243,12788,6,28.8,18.2,ND,63.3,CEMP defined criteria ,Y,Y,"total planted units: 250,000 units (6-8 plants per unit)",Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Y, epiphytic load","There was a red tide they note led to declines. Also, ""This dramatic decline from initial planting was related to a rapid spread of wasting disease in the bay as is discussed and documented in project's PEP Recommendations Memo (M&A 2018b). Wasting disease had commenced spreading in Mission Bay prior to commencement of dredging and continued throughout the summer of 2018""",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MB_Merkel_2018,MB_Merkel_2018_MA6,MB_Merkel_2018_MA6_6mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Assocites,Mission Bay,ND,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,""" The bareroot transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom""",NA,Y,"Donor eelgrass for the transplant was derived from eelgrass beds identified throughout Mission Bay. Multiple donor sites were employed in the transplant due both to the large scale of the transplant and the desire to ensure transplants reflected a high diversity of donor eelgrass material within the restored beds. During the transplant, additional donor sites from those initially identified had to be added due to significant losses of donor beds due to wasting disease between the time donor sites were identified in summer 2017 and transplants commenced in spring 2018.",2550,2145,272,ND,36.8,ND,ND,ND,"Ref data from MB Channel West Ref (Fig. 4c) - There were eight total reference areas. In this case, the ref area closest in distance to the restoration area was selected. ",2018,May-June,Spring/Summer,2,"0, 6, 12, 24",6,3.17,ND,"Listed as ""height"" - I am fairly positive this is depth based onthe way reported (eg Table 3) but not 100% sure",ND,ND,1750000,40,57,6,34.7,ND,ND,ND,CEMP defined criteria ,N,Y,"total planted units: 250,000 units (6-8 plants per unit)",Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Y, epiphytic load","There was a red tide they note led to declines. Also, ""This dramatic decline from initial planting was related to a rapid spread of wasting disease in the bay as is discussed and documented in project's PEP Recommendations Memo (M&A 2018b). Wasting disease had commenced spreading in Mission Bay prior to commencement of dredging and continued throughout the summer of 2018""",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MB_Merkel_2018,MB_Merkel_2018_MA6,MB_Merkel_2018_MA6_12mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Assocites,Mission Bay,ND,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,""" The bareroot transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom""",NA,Y,"Donor eelgrass for the transplant was derived from eelgrass beds identified throughout Mission Bay. Multiple donor sites were employed in the transplant due both to the large scale of the transplant and the desire to ensure transplants reflected a high diversity of donor eelgrass material within the restored beds. During the transplant, additional donor sites from those initially identified had to be added due to significant losses of donor beds due to wasting disease between the time donor sites were identified in summer 2017 and transplants commenced in spring 2018.",2550,2139,272,ND,136,ND,ND,ND,"Ref data from MB Channel West Ref (Fig. 4c) - There were eight total reference areas. In this case, the ref area closest in distance to the restoration area was selected. ",2018,May-June,Spring/Summer,2,"0, 6, 12, 24",12,3.17,ND,"Listed as ""height"" - I am fairly positive this is depth based onthe way reported (eg Table 3) but not 100% sure",ND,ND,1750000,40,114,6,49.6,ND,ND,ND,CEMP defined criteria ,N,Y,"total planted units: 250,000 units (6-8 plants per unit)",Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Y, epiphytic load","There was a red tide they note led to declines. Also, ""This dramatic decline from initial planting was related to a rapid spread of wasting disease in the bay as is discussed and documented in project's PEP Recommendations Memo (M&A 2018b). Wasting disease had commenced spreading in Mission Bay prior to commencement of dredging and continued throughout the summer of 2018""",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MB_Merkel_2018,MB_Merkel_2018_MA6,MB_Merkel_2018_MA6_24mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Assocites,Mission Bay,ND,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,""" The bareroot transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom""",NA,Y,"Donor eelgrass for the transplant was derived from eelgrass beds identified throughout Mission Bay. Multiple donor sites were employed in the transplant due both to the large scale of the transplant and the desire to ensure transplants reflected a high diversity of donor eelgrass material within the restored beds. During the transplant, additional donor sites from those initially identified had to be added due to significant losses of donor beds due to wasting disease between the time donor sites were identified in summer 2017 and transplants commenced in spring 2018.",2550,1781,272,ND,124.8,33.6,ND,64.7,"Ref data from MB Channel West Ref (Fig. 4c) - There were eight total reference areas. In this case, the ref area closest in distance to the restoration area was selected. ",2018,May-June,Spring/Summer,2,"0, 6, 12, 24",24,3.17,ND,"Listed as ""height"" - I am fairly positive this is depth based onthe way reported (eg Table 3) but not 100% sure",ND,ND,1750000,40,1012,6,28.8,10.1,ND,39.7,CEMP defined criteria ,Y,Y,"total planted units: 250,000 units (6-8 plants per unit)",Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Y, epiphytic load","There was a red tide they note led to declines. Also, ""This dramatic decline from initial planting was related to a rapid spread of wasting disease in the bay as is discussed and documented in project's PEP Recommendations Memo (M&A 2018b). Wasting disease had commenced spreading in Mission Bay prior to commencement of dredging and continued throughout the summer of 2018""",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MB_Merkel_2018,MB_Merkel_2018_MA7,MB_Merkel_2018_MA7_6mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Assocites,Mission Bay,ND,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,""" The bareroot transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom""",NA,Y,"Donor eelgrass for the transplant was derived from eelgrass beds identified throughout Mission Bay. Multiple donor sites were employed in the transplant due both to the large scale of the transplant and the desire to ensure transplants reflected a high diversity of donor eelgrass material within the restored beds. During the transplant, additional donor sites from those initially identified had to be added due to significant losses of donor beds due to wasting disease between the time donor sites were identified in summer 2017 and transplants commenced in spring 2018.",607,496,156.8,ND,145.6,ND,ND,ND,"Ref data from MB Channel East Ref (Fig. 4c) - There were eight total reference areas. In this case, the ref area closest in distance to the restoration area was selected. ",2018,May-June,Spring/Summer,2,"0, 6, 12, 24",6,3.17,ND,"Listed as ""height"" - I am fairly positive this is depth based onthe way reported (eg Table 3) but not 100% sure",ND,ND,1750000,1578,317,6,75.2,ND,ND,ND,CEMP defined criteria ,N,Y,"total planted units: 250,000 units (6-8 plants per unit)",Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Y, epiphytic load","There was a red tide they note led to declines. Also, ""This dramatic decline from initial planting was related to a rapid spread of wasting disease in the bay as is discussed and documented in project's PEP Recommendations Memo (M&A 2018b). Wasting disease had commenced spreading in Mission Bay prior to commencement of dredging and continued throughout the summer of 2018""",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MB_Merkel_2018,MB_Merkel_2018_MA7,MB_Merkel_2018_MA7_12mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Assocites,Mission Bay,ND,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,""" The bareroot transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom""",NA,Y,"Donor eelgrass for the transplant was derived from eelgrass beds identified throughout Mission Bay. Multiple donor sites were employed in the transplant due both to the large scale of the transplant and the desire to ensure transplants reflected a high diversity of donor eelgrass material within the restored beds. During the transplant, additional donor sites from those initially identified had to be added due to significant losses of donor beds due to wasting disease between the time donor sites were identified in summer 2017 and transplants commenced in spring 2018.",607,471,156.8,ND,108.8,ND,ND,ND,"Ref data from MB Channel East Ref (Fig. 4c) - There were eight total reference areas. In this case, the ref area closest in distance to the restoration area was selected. ",2018,May-June,Spring/Summer,2,"0, 6, 12, 24",12,3.17,ND,"Listed as ""height"" - I am fairly positive this is depth based onthe way reported (eg Table 3) but not 100% sure",ND,ND,1750000,1578,2609,6,124.8,ND,ND,ND,CEMP defined criteria ,N,Y,"total planted units: 250,000 units (6-8 plants per unit)",Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Y, epiphytic load","There was a red tide they note led to declines. Also, ""This dramatic decline from initial planting was related to a rapid spread of wasting disease in the bay as is discussed and documented in project's PEP Recommendations Memo (M&A 2018b). Wasting disease had commenced spreading in Mission Bay prior to commencement of dredging and continued throughout the summer of 2018""",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MB_Merkel_2018,MB_Merkel_2018_MA7,MB_Merkel_2018_MA7_24mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Assocites,Mission Bay,ND,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,""" The bareroot transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom""",NA,Y,"Donor eelgrass for the transplant was derived from eelgrass beds identified throughout Mission Bay. Multiple donor sites were employed in the transplant due both to the large scale of the transplant and the desire to ensure transplants reflected a high diversity of donor eelgrass material within the restored beds. During the transplant, additional donor sites from those initially identified had to be added due to significant losses of donor beds due to wasting disease between the time donor sites were identified in summer 2017 and transplants commenced in spring 2018.",607,526,156.8,ND,94.4,30.6,ND,54.2,"Ref data from MB Channel East Ref (Fig. 4c) - There were eight total reference areas. In this case, the ref area closest in distance to the restoration area was selected. ",2018,May-June,Spring/Summer,2,"0, 6, 12, 24",24,3.17,ND,"Listed as ""height"" - I am fairly positive this is depth based onthe way reported (eg Table 3) but not 100% sure",ND,ND,1750000,1578,5099,6,27.2,15.2,ND,97.7,CEMP defined criteria ,Y,Y,"total planted units: 250,000 units (6-8 plants per unit)",Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Y, epiphytic load","There was a red tide they note led to declines. Also, ""This dramatic decline from initial planting was related to a rapid spread of wasting disease in the bay as is discussed and documented in project's PEP Recommendations Memo (M&A 2018b). Wasting disease had commenced spreading in Mission Bay prior to commencement of dredging and continued throughout the summer of 2018""",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MB_Merkel_2018,MB_Merkel_2018_MA9,MB_Merkel_2018_MA9_6mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Assocites,Mission Bay,ND,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,""" The bareroot transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom""",NA,Y,"Donor eelgrass for the transplant was derived from eelgrass beds identified throughout Mission Bay. Multiple donor sites were employed in the transplant due both to the large scale of the transplant and the desire to ensure transplants reflected a high diversity of donor eelgrass material within the restored beds. During the transplant, additional donor sites from those initially identified had to be added due to significant losses of donor beds due to wasting disease between the time donor sites were identified in summer 2017 and transplants commenced in spring 2018.",3764,4048,73.6,ND,112,ND,ND,ND,"Ref data from Fiesta Bay Ref-2 (Fig. 4e) - There were eight total reference areas. In this case, the ref area closest in distance to the restoration area was selected. ",2018,May-June,Spring/Summer,2,"0, 6, 12, 24",6,3.17,ND,"Listed as ""height"" - I am fairly positive this is depth based onthe way reported (eg Table 3) but not 100% sure",ND,ND,1750000,5059,1713,6,70.4,ND,ND,ND,CEMP defined criteria ,N,Y,"total planted units: 250,000 units (6-8 plants per unit)",Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Y, epiphytic load","There was a red tide they note led to declines. Also, ""This dramatic decline from initial planting was related to a rapid spread of wasting disease in the bay as is discussed and documented in project's PEP Recommendations Memo (M&A 2018b). Wasting disease had commenced spreading in Mission Bay prior to commencement of dredging and continued throughout the summer of 2018""",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MB_Merkel_2018,MB_Merkel_2018_MA9,MB_Merkel_2018_MA9_12mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Assocites,Mission Bay,ND,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,""" The bareroot transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom""",NA,Y,"Donor eelgrass for the transplant was derived from eelgrass beds identified throughout Mission Bay. Multiple donor sites were employed in the transplant due both to the large scale of the transplant and the desire to ensure transplants reflected a high diversity of donor eelgrass material within the restored beds. During the transplant, additional donor sites from those initially identified had to be added due to significant losses of donor beds due to wasting disease between the time donor sites were identified in summer 2017 and transplants commenced in spring 2018.",3764,675,73.6,ND,126.4,ND,ND,ND,"Ref data from Fiesta Bay Ref-2 (Fig. 4e) - There were eight total reference areas. In this case, the ref area closest in distance to the restoration area was selected. ",2018,May-June,Spring/Summer,2,"0, 6, 12, 24",12,3.17,ND,"Listed as ""height"" - I am fairly positive this is depth based onthe way reported (eg Table 3) but not 100% sure",ND,ND,1750000,5059,2444,6,177.6,ND,ND,ND,CEMP defined criteria ,N,Y,"total planted units: 250,000 units (6-8 plants per unit)",Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Y, epiphytic load","There was a red tide they note led to declines. Also, ""This dramatic decline from initial planting was related to a rapid spread of wasting disease in the bay as is discussed and documented in project's PEP Recommendations Memo (M&A 2018b). Wasting disease had commenced spreading in Mission Bay prior to commencement of dredging and continued throughout the summer of 2018""",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MB_Merkel_2018,MB_Merkel_2018_MA9,MB_Merkel_2018_MA9_24mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Assocites,Mission Bay,ND,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,""" The bareroot transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom""",NA,Y,"Donor eelgrass for the transplant was derived from eelgrass beds identified throughout Mission Bay. Multiple donor sites were employed in the transplant due both to the large scale of the transplant and the desire to ensure transplants reflected a high diversity of donor eelgrass material within the restored beds. During the transplant, additional donor sites from those initially identified had to be added due to significant losses of donor beds due to wasting disease between the time donor sites were identified in summer 2017 and transplants commenced in spring 2018.",3764,3885,73.6,ND,124.8,36.3,ND,96,"Ref data from Fiesta Bay Ref-2 (Fig. 4e) - There were eight total reference areas. In this case, the ref area closest in distance to the restoration area was selected. ",2018,May-June,Spring/Summer,2,"0, 6, 12, 24",24,3.17,ND,"Listed as ""height"" - I am fairly positive this is depth based onthe way reported (eg Table 3) but not 100% sure",ND,ND,1750000,5059,1457,6,105.6,44.1,ND,34.3,CEMP defined criteria ,Y,Y,"total planted units: 250,000 units (6-8 plants per unit)",Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Y, epiphytic load","There was a red tide they note led to declines. Also, ""This dramatic decline from initial planting was related to a rapid spread of wasting disease in the bay as is discussed and documented in project's PEP Recommendations Memo (M&A 2018b). Wasting disease had commenced spreading in Mission Bay prior to commencement of dredging and continued throughout the summer of 2018""",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MB_Merkel_2018,MB_Merkel_2018_MA10,MB_Merkel_2018_MA10_6mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Assocites,Mission Bay,ND,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,""" The bareroot transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom""",NA,Y,"Donor eelgrass for the transplant was derived from eelgrass beds identified throughout Mission Bay. Multiple donor sites were employed in the transplant due both to the large scale of the transplant and the desire to ensure transplants reflected a high diversity of donor eelgrass material within the restored beds. During the transplant, additional donor sites from those initially identified had to be added due to significant losses of donor beds due to wasting disease between the time donor sites were identified in summer 2017 and transplants commenced in spring 2018.",3764,4048,73.6,ND,112,ND,ND,ND,"Ref data from Fiesta Bay Ref-2 (Fig. 4d) - There were eight total reference areas. In this case, the ref area closest in distance to the restoration area was selected. ",2018,May-June,Spring/Summer,2,"0, 6, 12, 24",6,3.17,ND,"Listed as ""height"" - I am fairly positive this is depth based onthe way reported (eg Table 3) but not 100% sure",ND,ND,1750000,12343,6126,6,59.2,ND,ND,ND,CEMP defined criteria ,N,Y,"total planted units: 250,000 units (6-8 plants per unit)",Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Y, epiphytic load","There was a red tide they note led to declines. Also, ""This dramatic decline from initial planting was related to a rapid spread of wasting disease in the bay as is discussed and documented in project's PEP Recommendations Memo (M&A 2018b). Wasting disease had commenced spreading in Mission Bay prior to commencement of dredging and continued throughout the summer of 2018""",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MB_Merkel_2018,MB_Merkel_2018_MA10,MB_Merkel_2018_MA10_12mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Assocites,Mission Bay,ND,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,""" The bareroot transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom""",NA,Y,"Donor eelgrass for the transplant was derived from eelgrass beds identified throughout Mission Bay. Multiple donor sites were employed in the transplant due both to the large scale of the transplant and the desire to ensure transplants reflected a high diversity of donor eelgrass material within the restored beds. During the transplant, additional donor sites from those initially identified had to be added due to significant losses of donor beds due to wasting disease between the time donor sites were identified in summer 2017 and transplants commenced in spring 2018.",3764,675,73.6,ND,126.4,ND,ND,ND,"Ref data from Fiesta Bay Ref-2 (Fig. 4d) - There were eight total reference areas. In this case, the ref area closest in distance to the restoration area was selected. ",2018,May-June,Spring/Summer,2,"0, 6, 12, 24",12,3.17,ND,"Listed as ""height"" - I am fairly positive this is depth based onthe way reported (eg Table 3) but not 100% sure",ND,ND,1750000,12343,3118,6,76.8,ND,ND,ND,CEMP defined criteria ,N,Y,"total planted units: 250,000 units (6-8 plants per unit)",Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Y, epiphytic load","There was a red tide they note led to declines. Also, ""This dramatic decline from initial planting was related to a rapid spread of wasting disease in the bay as is discussed and documented in project's PEP Recommendations Memo (M&A 2018b). Wasting disease had commenced spreading in Mission Bay prior to commencement of dredging and continued throughout the summer of 2018""",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MB_Merkel_2018,MB_Merkel_2018_MA10,MB_Merkel_2018_MA10_24mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Assocites,Mission Bay,ND,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,""" The bareroot transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom""",NA,Y,"Donor eelgrass for the transplant was derived from eelgrass beds identified throughout Mission Bay. Multiple donor sites were employed in the transplant due both to the large scale of the transplant and the desire to ensure transplants reflected a high diversity of donor eelgrass material within the restored beds. During the transplant, additional donor sites from those initially identified had to be added due to significant losses of donor beds due to wasting disease between the time donor sites were identified in summer 2017 and transplants commenced in spring 2018.",3764,3885,73.6,ND,124.8,36.3,ND,96,"Ref data from Fiesta Bay Ref-2 (Fig. 4d) - There were eight total reference areas. In this case, the ref area closest in distance to the restoration area was selected. ",2018,May-June,Spring/Summer,2,"0, 6, 12, 24",24,3.17,ND,"Listed as ""height"" - I am fairly positive this is depth based onthe way reported (eg Table 3) but not 100% sure",ND,ND,1750000,12343,7042,6,102.4,41.4,ND,48.5,CEMP defined criteria ,Y,Y,"total planted units: 250,000 units (6-8 plants per unit)",Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Y, epiphytic load","There was a red tide they note led to declines. Also, ""This dramatic decline from initial planting was related to a rapid spread of wasting disease in the bay as is discussed and documented in project's PEP Recommendations Memo (M&A 2018b). Wasting disease had commenced spreading in Mission Bay prior to commencement of dredging and continued throughout the summer of 2018""",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MB_Merkel_2018,MB_Merkel_2018_MA11,MB_Merkel_2018_MA11_6mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Assocites,Mission Bay,ND,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,""" The bareroot transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom""",NA,Y,"Donor eelgrass for the transplant was derived from eelgrass beds identified throughout Mission Bay. Multiple donor sites were employed in the transplant due both to the large scale of the transplant and the desire to ensure transplants reflected a high diversity of donor eelgrass material within the restored beds. During the transplant, additional donor sites from those initially identified had to be added due to significant losses of donor beds due to wasting disease between the time donor sites were identified in summer 2017 and transplants commenced in spring 2018.",3764,4048,73.6,ND,112,ND,ND,ND,"Ref data from Fiesta Bay Ref-2 (Fig. 4e) - There were eight total reference areas. In this case, the ref area closest in distance to the restoration area was selected. ",2018,May-June,Spring/Summer,2,"0, 6, 12, 24",6,3.17,ND,"Listed as ""height"" - I am fairly positive this is depth based onthe way reported (eg Table 3) but not 100% sure",ND,ND,1750000,3521,5029,6,152,ND,ND,ND,CEMP defined criteria ,N,Y,"total planted units: 250,000 units (6-8 plants per unit)",Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Y, epiphytic load","There was a red tide they note led to declines. Also, ""This dramatic decline from initial planting was related to a rapid spread of wasting disease in the bay as is discussed and documented in project's PEP Recommendations Memo (M&A 2018b). Wasting disease had commenced spreading in Mission Bay prior to commencement of dredging and continued throughout the summer of 2018""",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MB_Merkel_2018,MB_Merkel_2018_MA11,MB_Merkel_2018_MA11_12mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Assocites,Mission Bay,ND,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,""" The bareroot transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom""",NA,Y,"Donor eelgrass for the transplant was derived from eelgrass beds identified throughout Mission Bay. Multiple donor sites were employed in the transplant due both to the large scale of the transplant and the desire to ensure transplants reflected a high diversity of donor eelgrass material within the restored beds. During the transplant, additional donor sites from those initially identified had to be added due to significant losses of donor beds due to wasting disease between the time donor sites were identified in summer 2017 and transplants commenced in spring 2018.",3764,675,73.6,ND,126.4,ND,ND,ND,"Ref data from Fiesta Bay Ref-2 (Fig. 4e) - There were eight total reference areas. In this case, the ref area closest in distance to the restoration area was selected. ",2018,May-June,Spring/Summer,2,"0, 6, 12, 24",12,3.17,ND,"Listed as ""height"" - I am fairly positive this is depth based onthe way reported (eg Table 3) but not 100% sure",ND,ND,1750000,3521,4562,6,185.6,ND,ND,ND,CEMP defined criteria ,N,Y,"total planted units: 250,000 units (6-8 plants per unit)",Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Y, epiphytic load","There was a red tide they note led to declines. Also, ""This dramatic decline from initial planting was related to a rapid spread of wasting disease in the bay as is discussed and documented in project's PEP Recommendations Memo (M&A 2018b). Wasting disease had commenced spreading in Mission Bay prior to commencement of dredging and continued throughout the summer of 2018""",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MB_Merkel_2018,MB_Merkel_2018_MA11,MB_Merkel_2018_MA11_24mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Assocites,Mission Bay,ND,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,""" The bareroot transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom""",NA,Y,"Donor eelgrass for the transplant was derived from eelgrass beds identified throughout Mission Bay. Multiple donor sites were employed in the transplant due both to the large scale of the transplant and the desire to ensure transplants reflected a high diversity of donor eelgrass material within the restored beds. During the transplant, additional donor sites from those initially identified had to be added due to significant losses of donor beds due to wasting disease between the time donor sites were identified in summer 2017 and transplants commenced in spring 2018.",3764,3885,73.6,ND,124.8,36.3,ND,96,"Ref data from Fiesta Bay Ref-2 (Fig. 4e) - There were eight total reference areas. In this case, the ref area closest in distance to the restoration area was selected. ",2018,May-June,Spring/Summer,2,"0, 6, 12, 24",24,3.17,ND,"Listed as ""height"" - I am fairly positive this is depth based onthe way reported (eg Table 3) but not 100% sure",ND,ND,1750000,3521,1700,6,78.4,29.6,ND,29.2,CEMP defined criteria ,Y,Y,"total planted units: 250,000 units (6-8 plants per unit)",Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Y, epiphytic load","There was a red tide they note led to declines. Also, ""This dramatic decline from initial planting was related to a rapid spread of wasting disease in the bay as is discussed and documented in project's PEP Recommendations Memo (M&A 2018b). Wasting disease had commenced spreading in Mission Bay prior to commencement of dredging and continued throughout the summer of 2018""",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MB_Merkel_2018,MB_Merkel_2018_MA12,MB_Merkel_2018_MA12_6mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Assocites,Mission Bay,ND,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,""" The bareroot transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom""",NA,Y,"Donor eelgrass for the transplant was derived from eelgrass beds identified throughout Mission Bay. Multiple donor sites were employed in the transplant due both to the large scale of the transplant and the desire to ensure transplants reflected a high diversity of donor eelgrass material within the restored beds. During the transplant, additional donor sites from those initially identified had to be added due to significant losses of donor beds due to wasting disease between the time donor sites were identified in summer 2017 and transplants commenced in spring 2018.",1659,2022,100.8,ND,36.8,ND,ND,ND,"Ref data from Fiesta Bay Ref-1 (Fig. 4f) - There were eight total reference areas. In this case, the ref area closest in distance to the restoration area was selected. ",2018,May-June,Spring/Summer,2,"0, 6, 12, 24",6,3.17,ND,"Listed as ""height"" - I am fairly positive this is depth based onthe way reported (eg Table 3) but not 100% sure",ND,ND,1750000,41764,5966,6,51.2,ND,ND,ND,CEMP defined criteria ,N,Y,"total planted units: 250,000 units (6-8 plants per unit)",Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Y, epiphytic load","There was a red tide they note led to declines. Also, ""This dramatic decline from initial planting was related to a rapid spread of wasting disease in the bay as is discussed and documented in project's PEP Recommendations Memo (M&A 2018b). Wasting disease had commenced spreading in Mission Bay prior to commencement of dredging and continued throughout the summer of 2018""",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MB_Merkel_2018,MB_Merkel_2018_MA12,MB_Merkel_2018_MA12_12mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Assocites,Mission Bay,ND,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,""" The bareroot transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom""",NA,Y,"Donor eelgrass for the transplant was derived from eelgrass beds identified throughout Mission Bay. Multiple donor sites were employed in the transplant due both to the large scale of the transplant and the desire to ensure transplants reflected a high diversity of donor eelgrass material within the restored beds. During the transplant, additional donor sites from those initially identified had to be added due to significant losses of donor beds due to wasting disease between the time donor sites were identified in summer 2017 and transplants commenced in spring 2018.",1659,1604,100.8,ND,126.4,ND,ND,ND,"Ref data from Fiesta Bay Ref-1 (Fig. 4f) - There were eight total reference areas. In this case, the ref area closest in distance to the restoration area was selected. ",2018,May-June,Spring/Summer,2,"0, 6, 12, 24",12,3.17,ND,"Listed as ""height"" - I am fairly positive this is depth based onthe way reported (eg Table 3) but not 100% sure",ND,ND,1750000,41764,11835,6,60.8,ND,ND,ND,CEMP defined criteria ,N,Y,"total planted units: 250,000 units (6-8 plants per unit)",Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Y, epiphytic load","There was a red tide they note led to declines. Also, ""This dramatic decline from initial planting was related to a rapid spread of wasting disease in the bay as is discussed and documented in project's PEP Recommendations Memo (M&A 2018b). Wasting disease had commenced spreading in Mission Bay prior to commencement of dredging and continued throughout the summer of 2018""",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MB_Merkel_2018,MB_Merkel_2018_MA12,MB_Merkel_2018_MA12_24mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Assocites,Mission Bay,ND,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,""" The bareroot transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom""",NA,Y,"Donor eelgrass for the transplant was derived from eelgrass beds identified throughout Mission Bay. Multiple donor sites were employed in the transplant due both to the large scale of the transplant and the desire to ensure transplants reflected a high diversity of donor eelgrass material within the restored beds. During the transplant, additional donor sites from those initially identified had to be added due to significant losses of donor beds due to wasting disease between the time donor sites were identified in summer 2017 and transplants commenced in spring 2018.",1659,486,100.8,ND,73.6,34.7,ND,12.8,"Ref data from Fiesta Bay Ref-1 (Fig. 4f) - There were eight total reference areas. In this case, the ref area closest in distance to the restoration area was selected. ",2018,May-June,Spring/Summer,2,"0, 6, 12, 24",24,3.17,ND,"Listed as ""height"" - I am fairly positive this is depth based onthe way reported (eg Table 3) but not 100% sure",ND,ND,1750000,41764,21286,6,136,40.8,ND,43.9,CEMP defined criteria ,Y,Y,"total planted units: 250,000 units (6-8 plants per unit)",Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Y, epiphytic load","There was a red tide they note led to declines. Also, ""This dramatic decline from initial planting was related to a rapid spread of wasting disease in the bay as is discussed and documented in project's PEP Recommendations Memo (M&A 2018b). Wasting disease had commenced spreading in Mission Bay prior to commencement of dredging and continued throughout the summer of 2018""",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MB_Merkel_2018,MB_Merkel_2018_MA13_14,MB_Merkel_2018_MA13_14_6mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Assocites,Mission Bay,ND,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,""" The bareroot transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom""",NA,Y,"Donor eelgrass for the transplant was derived from eelgrass beds identified throughout Mission Bay. Multiple donor sites were employed in the transplant due both to the large scale of the transplant and the desire to ensure transplants reflected a high diversity of donor eelgrass material within the restored beds. During the transplant, additional donor sites from those initially identified had to be added due to significant losses of donor beds due to wasting disease between the time donor sites were identified in summer 2017 and transplants commenced in spring 2018.",1700,643,140.8,ND,75.2,ND,ND,ND,"Ref data from N Pacific Passage Ref (Fig. 4g) - There were eight total reference areas. In this case, the ref area closest in distance to the restoration area was selected. ",2018,May-June,Spring/Summer,2,"0, 6, 12, 24",6,3.17,ND,"Listed as ""height"" - I am fairly positive this is depth based onthe way reported (eg Table 3) but not 100% sure",ND,ND,1750000,5625,906,6,40,ND,ND,ND,CEMP defined criteria ,N,Y,"total planted units: 250,000 units (6-8 plants per unit)",Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Y, epiphytic load","There was a red tide they note led to declines. Also, ""This dramatic decline from initial planting was related to a rapid spread of wasting disease in the bay as is discussed and documented in project's PEP Recommendations Memo (M&A 2018b). Wasting disease had commenced spreading in Mission Bay prior to commencement of dredging and continued throughout the summer of 2018""",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MB_Merkel_2018,MB_Merkel_2018_MA13_14,MB_Merkel_2018_MA13_14_12mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Assocites,Mission Bay,ND,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,""" The bareroot transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom""",NA,Y,"Donor eelgrass for the transplant was derived from eelgrass beds identified throughout Mission Bay. Multiple donor sites were employed in the transplant due both to the large scale of the transplant and the desire to ensure transplants reflected a high diversity of donor eelgrass material within the restored beds. During the transplant, additional donor sites from those initially identified had to be added due to significant losses of donor beds due to wasting disease between the time donor sites were identified in summer 2017 and transplants commenced in spring 2018.",1700,871,140.8,ND,121.6,ND,ND,ND,"Ref data from N Pacific Passage Ref (Fig. 4g) - There were eight total reference areas. In this case, the ref area closest in distance to the restoration area was selected. ",2018,May-June,Spring/Summer,2,"0, 6, 12, 24",12,3.17,ND,"Listed as ""height"" - I am fairly positive this is depth based onthe way reported (eg Table 3) but not 100% sure",ND,ND,1750000,5625,1641,6,80,ND,ND,ND,CEMP defined criteria ,N,Y,"total planted units: 250,000 units (6-8 plants per unit)",Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Y, epiphytic load","There was a red tide they note led to declines. Also, ""This dramatic decline from initial planting was related to a rapid spread of wasting disease in the bay as is discussed and documented in project's PEP Recommendations Memo (M&A 2018b). Wasting disease had commenced spreading in Mission Bay prior to commencement of dredging and continued throughout the summer of 2018""",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MB_Merkel_2018,MB_Merkel_2018_MA13_14,MB_Merkel_2018_MA13_14_24mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Assocites,Mission Bay,ND,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,""" The bareroot transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom""",NA,Y,"Donor eelgrass for the transplant was derived from eelgrass beds identified throughout Mission Bay. Multiple donor sites were employed in the transplant due both to the large scale of the transplant and the desire to ensure transplants reflected a high diversity of donor eelgrass material within the restored beds. During the transplant, additional donor sites from those initially identified had to be added due to significant losses of donor beds due to wasting disease between the time donor sites were identified in summer 2017 and transplants commenced in spring 2018.",1700,1457,140.8,ND,211.2,42.5,ND,47.4,"Ref data from N Pacific Passage Ref (Fig. 4g) - There were eight total reference areas. In this case, the ref area closest in distance to the restoration area was selected. ",2018,May-June,Spring/Summer,2,"0, 6, 12, 24",24,3.17,ND,"Listed as ""height"" - I am fairly positive this is depth based onthe way reported (eg Table 3) but not 100% sure",ND,ND,1750000,5625,4452,6,195.2,52.1,ND,34.2,CEMP defined criteria ,Y,Y,"total planted units: 250,000 units (6-8 plants per unit)",Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Y, epiphytic load","There was a red tide they note led to declines. Also, ""This dramatic decline from initial planting was related to a rapid spread of wasting disease in the bay as is discussed and documented in project's PEP Recommendations Memo (M&A 2018b). Wasting disease had commenced spreading in Mission Bay prior to commencement of dredging and continued throughout the summer of 2018""",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MB_Merkel_2018,MB_Merkel_2018_MA15,MB_Merkel_2018_MA15_6mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Assocites,Mission Bay,ND,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,""" The bareroot transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom""",NA,Y,"Donor eelgrass for the transplant was derived from eelgrass beds identified throughout Mission Bay. Multiple donor sites were employed in the transplant due both to the large scale of the transplant and the desire to ensure transplants reflected a high diversity of donor eelgrass material within the restored beds. During the transplant, additional donor sites from those initially identified had to be added due to significant losses of donor beds due to wasting disease between the time donor sites were identified in summer 2017 and transplants commenced in spring 2018.",3764,4048,73.6,ND,112,ND,ND,ND,"Ref data from Fiesta Bay Ref-2 (Fig. 4e) - There were eight total reference areas. In this case, the ref area closest in distance to the restoration area was selected. ",2018,May-June,Spring/Summer,2,"0, 6, 12, 24",6,3.17,ND,"Listed as ""height"" - I am fairly positive this is depth based onthe way reported (eg Table 3) but not 100% sure",ND,ND,1750000,9915,424,6,60.8,ND,ND,ND,CEMP defined criteria ,N,Y,"total planted units: 250,000 units (6-8 plants per unit)",Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Y, epiphytic load","There was a red tide they note led to declines. Also, ""This dramatic decline from initial planting was related to a rapid spread of wasting disease in the bay as is discussed and documented in project's PEP Recommendations Memo (M&A 2018b). Wasting disease had commenced spreading in Mission Bay prior to commencement of dredging and continued throughout the summer of 2018""",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MB_Merkel_2018,MB_Merkel_2018_MA15,MB_Merkel_2018_MA15_12mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Assocites,Mission Bay,ND,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,""" The bareroot transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom""",NA,Y,"Donor eelgrass for the transplant was derived from eelgrass beds identified throughout Mission Bay. Multiple donor sites were employed in the transplant due both to the large scale of the transplant and the desire to ensure transplants reflected a high diversity of donor eelgrass material within the restored beds. During the transplant, additional donor sites from those initially identified had to be added due to significant losses of donor beds due to wasting disease between the time donor sites were identified in summer 2017 and transplants commenced in spring 2018.",3764,675,73.6,ND,126.4,ND,ND,ND,"Ref data from Fiesta Bay Ref-2 (Fig. 4e) - There were eight total reference areas. In this case, the ref area closest in distance to the restoration area was selected. ",2018,May-June,Spring/Summer,2,"0, 6, 12, 24",12,3.17,ND,"Listed as ""height"" - I am fairly positive this is depth based onthe way reported (eg Table 3) but not 100% sure",ND,ND,1750000,9915,5805,6,102.4,ND,ND,ND,CEMP defined criteria ,N,Y,"total planted units: 250,000 units (6-8 plants per unit)",Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Y, epiphytic load","There was a red tide they note led to declines. Also, ""This dramatic decline from initial planting was related to a rapid spread of wasting disease in the bay as is discussed and documented in project's PEP Recommendations Memo (M&A 2018b). Wasting disease had commenced spreading in Mission Bay prior to commencement of dredging and continued throughout the summer of 2018""",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MB_Merkel_2018,MB_Merkel_2018_MA15,MB_Merkel_2018_MA15_24mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Assocites,Mission Bay,ND,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,""" The bareroot transplant made use of biodegradable soft anchors to fasten bare_root units to the bottom""",NA,Y,"Donor eelgrass for the transplant was derived from eelgrass beds identified throughout Mission Bay. Multiple donor sites were employed in the transplant due both to the large scale of the transplant and the desire to ensure transplants reflected a high diversity of donor eelgrass material within the restored beds. During the transplant, additional donor sites from those initially identified had to be added due to significant losses of donor beds due to wasting disease between the time donor sites were identified in summer 2017 and transplants commenced in spring 2018.",3764,3885,73.6,ND,124.8,36.3,ND,96,"Ref data from Fiesta Bay Ref-2 (Fig. 4e) - There were eight total reference areas. In this case, the ref area closest in distance to the restoration area was selected. ",2018,May-June,Spring/Summer,2,"0, 6, 12, 24",24,3.17,ND,"Listed as ""height"" - I am fairly positive this is depth based onthe way reported (eg Table 3) but not 100% sure",ND,ND,1750000,9915,5261,6,136,28.5,ND,50.8,CEMP defined criteria ,Y,Y,"total planted units: 250,000 units (6-8 plants per unit)",Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Y, epiphytic load","There was a red tide they note led to declines. Also, ""This dramatic decline from initial planting was related to a rapid spread of wasting disease in the bay as is discussed and documented in project's PEP Recommendations Memo (M&A 2018b). Wasting disease had commenced spreading in Mission Bay prior to commencement of dredging and continued throughout the summer of 2018""",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MB_Merkel_2018,MB_Merkel_2018_MALeisureLagoon,MB_Merkel_2018_MALeisureLagoon_6mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Assocites,Mission Bay,ND,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Other,"""In addition to the direct planting, an additional 14.20 acres was planted by depositing eelgrass rich dredge sediment on to the top layers of fills placed within the Sail Bay Reuse Areas 3 and 7. This sediment was derived from dredge areas supporting dense eelgrass but shallow cuts that were deferred to late in the dredging program in order to make use of the high rhizome density present in this sediment as starter material for bed development. These transplant methods are described in the transplant plan (Merkel & Associates 2017).""  "" These reuse areas include two of the Sail Bay borrow sites (Sail Bay Reuse 3 and 7) and Leisure Lagoon.""  - AKA in these three sites, they still planted, but also place rhizome rich sed fill from the dredge in these sites. 

                                
                        
                
        ",NA,Y,"Donor eelgrass for the transplant was derived from eelgrass beds identified throughout Mission Bay. Multiple donor sites were employed in the transplant due both to the large scale of the transplant and the desire to ensure transplants reflected a high diversity of donor eelgrass material within the restored beds. During the transplant, additional donor sites from those initially identified had to be added due to significant losses of donor beds due to wasting disease between the time donor sites were identified in summer 2017 and transplants commenced in spring 2018.",1700,643,140.8,ND,75.2,ND,ND,ND,"Ref data from N Pacific Passage Ref (Fig. 4g) - There were eight total reference areas. In this case, the ref area closest in distance to the restoration area was selected. ",2018,May-June,Spring/Summer,2,"0, 6, 12, 24",6,3.17,ND,"Listed as ""height"" - I am fairly positive this is depth based onthe way reported (eg Table 3) but not 100% sure",ND,ND,1750000,7042,1080,6,48,ND,ND,ND,CEMP defined criteria ,N,Y,"total planted units: 250,000 units (6-8 plants per unit)",Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Y, epiphytic load","There was a red tide they note led to declines. Also, ""This dramatic decline from initial planting was related to a rapid spread of wasting disease in the bay as is discussed and documented in project's PEP Recommendations Memo (M&A 2018b). Wasting disease had commenced spreading in Mission Bay prior to commencement of dredging and continued throughout the summer of 2018""",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MB_Merkel_2018,MB_Merkel_2018_MALeisureLagoon,MB_Merkel_2018_MALeisureLagoon_12mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Assocites,Mission Bay,ND,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Other,"""In addition to the direct planting, an additional 14.20 acres was planted by depositing eelgrass rich dredge sediment on to the top layers of fills placed within the Sail Bay Reuse Areas 3 and 7. This sediment was derived from dredge areas supporting dense eelgrass but shallow cuts that were deferred to late in the dredging program in order to make use of the high rhizome density present in this sediment as starter material for bed development. These transplant methods are described in the transplant plan (Merkel & Associates 2017).""  "" These reuse areas include two of the Sail Bay borrow sites (Sail Bay Reuse 3 and 7) and Leisure Lagoon.""  - AKA in these three sites, they still planted, but also place rhizome rich sed fill from the dredge in these sites. 

                                
                        
                
        ",NA,Y,"Donor eelgrass for the transplant was derived from eelgrass beds identified throughout Mission Bay. Multiple donor sites were employed in the transplant due both to the large scale of the transplant and the desire to ensure transplants reflected a high diversity of donor eelgrass material within the restored beds. During the transplant, additional donor sites from those initially identified had to be added due to significant losses of donor beds due to wasting disease between the time donor sites were identified in summer 2017 and transplants commenced in spring 2018.",1700,871,140.8,ND,121.6,ND,ND,ND,"Ref data from N Pacific Passage Ref (Fig. 4g) - There were eight total reference areas. In this case, the ref area closest in distance to the restoration area was selected. ",2018,May-June,Spring/Summer,2,"0, 6, 12, 24",12,3.17,ND,"Listed as ""height"" - I am fairly positive this is depth based onthe way reported (eg Table 3) but not 100% sure",ND,ND,1750000,7042,1387,6,57.6,ND,ND,ND,CEMP defined criteria ,N,Y,"total planted units: 250,000 units (6-8 plants per unit)",Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Y, epiphytic load","There was a red tide they note led to declines. Also, ""This dramatic decline from initial planting was related to a rapid spread of wasting disease in the bay as is discussed and documented in project's PEP Recommendations Memo (M&A 2018b). Wasting disease had commenced spreading in Mission Bay prior to commencement of dredging and continued throughout the summer of 2018""",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MB_Merkel_2018,MB_Merkel_2018_MALeisureLagoon,MB_Merkel_2018_MALeisureLagoon_24mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Assocites,Mission Bay,ND,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Other,"""In addition to the direct planting, an additional 14.20 acres was planted by depositing eelgrass rich dredge sediment on to the top layers of fills placed within the Sail Bay Reuse Areas 3 and 7. This sediment was derived from dredge areas supporting dense eelgrass but shallow cuts that were deferred to late in the dredging program in order to make use of the high rhizome density present in this sediment as starter material for bed development. These transplant methods are described in the transplant plan (Merkel & Associates 2017).""  "" These reuse areas include two of the Sail Bay borrow sites (Sail Bay Reuse 3 and 7) and Leisure Lagoon.""  - AKA in these three sites, they still planted, but also place rhizome rich sed fill from the dredge in these sites. 

                                
                        
                
        ",NA,Y,"Donor eelgrass for the transplant was derived from eelgrass beds identified throughout Mission Bay. Multiple donor sites were employed in the transplant due both to the large scale of the transplant and the desire to ensure transplants reflected a high diversity of donor eelgrass material within the restored beds. During the transplant, additional donor sites from those initially identified had to be added due to significant losses of donor beds due to wasting disease between the time donor sites were identified in summer 2017 and transplants commenced in spring 2018.",1700,1457,140.8,ND,211.2,42.5,ND,47.4,"Ref data from N Pacific Passage Ref (Fig. 4g) - There were eight total reference areas. In this case, the ref area closest in distance to the restoration area was selected. ",2018,May-June,Spring/Summer,2,"0, 6, 12, 24",24,3.17,ND,"Listed as ""height"" - I am fairly positive this is depth based onthe way reported (eg Table 3) but not 100% sure",ND,ND,1750000,7042,3480,6,147.2,47.6,ND,28,CEMP defined criteria ,Y,Y,"total planted units: 250,000 units (6-8 plants per unit)",Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Y, epiphytic load","There was a red tide they note led to declines. Also, ""This dramatic decline from initial planting was related to a rapid spread of wasting disease in the bay as is discussed and documented in project's PEP Recommendations Memo (M&A 2018b). Wasting disease had commenced spreading in Mission Bay prior to commencement of dredging and continued throughout the summer of 2018""",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MB_Merkel_2018,MB_Merkel_2018_MAReuseAr1,MB_Merkel_2018_MAReuseArNorth_6mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Assocites,Mission Bay,Sail Bay,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Other,"""In addition to the direct planting, an additional 14.20 acres was planted by depositing eelgrass rich dredge sediment on to the top layers of fills placed within the Sail Bay Reuse Areas 3 and 7. This sediment was derived from dredge areas supporting dense eelgrass but shallow cuts that were deferred to late in the dredging program in order to make use of the high rhizome density present in this sediment as starter material for bed development. These transplant methods are described in the transplant plan (Merkel & Associates 2017).""  "" These reuse areas include two of the Sail Bay borrow sites (Sail Bay Reuse 3 and 7) and Leisure Lagoon.""  - AKA in these three sites, they still planted, but also place rhizome rich sed fill from the dredge in these sites. 

                                
                        
                
        ",NA,Y,"Donor eelgrass for the transplant was derived from eelgrass beds identified throughout Mission Bay. Multiple donor sites were employed in the transplant due both to the large scale of the transplant and the desire to ensure transplants reflected a high diversity of donor eelgrass material within the restored beds. During the transplant, additional donor sites from those initially identified had to be added due to significant losses of donor beds due to wasting disease between the time donor sites were identified in summer 2017 and transplants commenced in spring 2018.",2995,0,60.8,ND,0,ND,ND,ND,"Ref data from Sail Bay Ref-1 (Fig. 4a) - There were eight total reference areas. In this case, the ref area closest in distance to the restoration area was selected. ",2018,May-June,Spring/Summer,2,"0, 6, 12, 24",6,3.17,ND,"Listed as ""height"" - I am fairly positive this is depth based onthe way reported (eg Table 3) but not 100% sure",ND,ND,1750000,19506,4360,6,62.4,ND,ND,ND,CEMP defined criteria ,N,Y,"total planted units: 250,000 units (6-8 plants per unit)",Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Y, epiphytic load","There was a red tide they note led to declines. Also, ""This dramatic decline from initial planting was related to a rapid spread of wasting disease in the bay as is discussed and documented in project's PEP Recommendations Memo (M&A 2018b). Wasting disease had commenced spreading in Mission Bay prior to commencement of dredging and continued throughout the summer of 2018""",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MB_Merkel_2018,MB_Merkel_2018_MAReuseAr1,MB_Merkel_2018_MAReuseArNorth_12mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Assocites,Mission Bay,Sail Bay,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Other,"""In addition to the direct planting, an additional 14.20 acres was planted by depositing eelgrass rich dredge sediment on to the top layers of fills placed within the Sail Bay Reuse Areas 3 and 7. This sediment was derived from dredge areas supporting dense eelgrass but shallow cuts that were deferred to late in the dredging program in order to make use of the high rhizome density present in this sediment as starter material for bed development. These transplant methods are described in the transplant plan (Merkel & Associates 2017).""  "" These reuse areas include two of the Sail Bay borrow sites (Sail Bay Reuse 3 and 7) and Leisure Lagoon.""  - AKA in these three sites, they still planted, but also place rhizome rich sed fill from the dredge in these sites. 

                                
                        
                
        ",NA,Y,"Donor eelgrass for the transplant was derived from eelgrass beds identified throughout Mission Bay. Multiple donor sites were employed in the transplant due both to the large scale of the transplant and the desire to ensure transplants reflected a high diversity of donor eelgrass material within the restored beds. During the transplant, additional donor sites from those initially identified had to be added due to significant losses of donor beds due to wasting disease between the time donor sites were identified in summer 2017 and transplants commenced in spring 2018.",2995,3901,60.8,ND,80,ND,ND,ND,"Ref data from Sail Bay Ref-1 (Fig. 4a) - There were eight total reference areas. In this case, the ref area closest in distance to the restoration area was selected. ",2018,May-June,Spring/Summer,2,"0, 6, 12, 24",12,3.17,ND,"Listed as ""height"" - I am fairly positive this is depth based onthe way reported (eg Table 3) but not 100% sure",ND,ND,1750000,19506,15667,6,96,ND,ND,ND,CEMP defined criteria ,N,Y,"total planted units: 250,000 units (6-8 plants per unit)",Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Y, epiphytic load","There was a red tide they note led to declines. Also, ""This dramatic decline from initial planting was related to a rapid spread of wasting disease in the bay as is discussed and documented in project's PEP Recommendations Memo (M&A 2018b). Wasting disease had commenced spreading in Mission Bay prior to commencement of dredging and continued throughout the summer of 2018""",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MB_Merkel_2018,MB_Merkel_2018_MAReuseAr1,MB_Merkel_2018_MAReuseArNorth_24mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Assocites,Mission Bay,Sail Bay,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Other,"""In addition to the direct planting, an additional 14.20 acres was planted by depositing eelgrass rich dredge sediment on to the top layers of fills placed within the Sail Bay Reuse Areas 3 and 7. This sediment was derived from dredge areas supporting dense eelgrass but shallow cuts that were deferred to late in the dredging program in order to make use of the high rhizome density present in this sediment as starter material for bed development. These transplant methods are described in the transplant plan (Merkel & Associates 2017).""  "" These reuse areas include two of the Sail Bay borrow sites (Sail Bay Reuse 3 and 7) and Leisure Lagoon.""  - AKA in these three sites, they still planted, but also place rhizome rich sed fill from the dredge in these sites. 

                                
                        
                
        ",NA,Y,"Donor eelgrass for the transplant was derived from eelgrass beds identified throughout Mission Bay. Multiple donor sites were employed in the transplant due both to the large scale of the transplant and the desire to ensure transplants reflected a high diversity of donor eelgrass material within the restored beds. During the transplant, additional donor sites from those initially identified had to be added due to significant losses of donor beds due to wasting disease between the time donor sites were identified in summer 2017 and transplants commenced in spring 2018.",2995,40,60.8,ND,38.4,24.1,ND,6.7,"Ref data from Sail Bay Ref-1 (Fig. 4a) - There were eight total reference areas. In this case, the ref area closest in distance to the restoration area was selected. ",2018,May-June,Spring/Summer,2,"0, 6, 12, 24",24,3.17,ND,"Listed as ""height"" - I am fairly positive this is depth based onthe way reported (eg Table 3) but not 100% sure",ND,ND,1750000,19506,9389,6,48,27.2,ND,43.7,CEMP defined criteria ,Y,Y,"total planted units: 250,000 units (6-8 plants per unit)",Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Y, epiphytic load","There was a red tide they note led to declines. Also, ""This dramatic decline from initial planting was related to a rapid spread of wasting disease in the bay as is discussed and documented in project's PEP Recommendations Memo (M&A 2018b). Wasting disease had commenced spreading in Mission Bay prior to commencement of dredging and continued throughout the summer of 2018""",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MB_Merkel_2018,MB_Merkel_2018_MAReuseAr2,MB_Merkel_2018_MAReuseArSouth_6mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Assocites,Mission Bay,Sail Bay,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Other,"""In addition to the direct planting, an additional 14.20 acres was planted by depositing eelgrass rich dredge sediment on to the top layers of fills placed within the Sail Bay Reuse Areas 3 and 7. This sediment was derived from dredge areas supporting dense eelgrass but shallow cuts that were deferred to late in the dredging program in order to make use of the high rhizome density present in this sediment as starter material for bed development. These transplant methods are described in the transplant plan (Merkel & Associates 2017).""  "" These reuse areas include two of the Sail Bay borrow sites (Sail Bay Reuse 3 and 7) and Leisure Lagoon.""  - AKA in these three sites, they still planted, but also place rhizome rich sed fill from the dredge in these sites. 

                                
                        
                
        ",NA,Y,"Donor eelgrass for the transplant was derived from eelgrass beds identified throughout Mission Bay. Multiple donor sites were employed in the transplant due both to the large scale of the transplant and the desire to ensure transplants reflected a high diversity of donor eelgrass material within the restored beds. During the transplant, additional donor sites from those initially identified had to be added due to significant losses of donor beds due to wasting disease between the time donor sites were identified in summer 2017 and transplants commenced in spring 2018.",2995,0,60.8,ND,0,ND,ND,ND,"Ref data from Sail Bay Ref-1 (Fig. 4a) - There were eight total reference areas. In this case, the ref area closest in distance to the restoration area was selected. ",2018,May-June,Spring/Summer,2,"0, 6, 12, 24",6,3.17,ND,"Listed as ""height"" - I am fairly positive this is depth based onthe way reported (eg Table 3) but not 100% sure",ND,ND,1750000,28449,1697,6,67.2,ND,ND,ND,CEMP defined criteria ,N,Y,"total planted units: 250,000 units (6-8 plants per unit)",Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Y, epiphytic load","There was a red tide they note led to declines. Also, ""This dramatic decline from initial planting was related to a rapid spread of wasting disease in the bay as is discussed and documented in project's PEP Recommendations Memo (M&A 2018b). Wasting disease had commenced spreading in Mission Bay prior to commencement of dredging and continued throughout the summer of 2018""",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MB_Merkel_2018,MB_Merkel_2018_MAReuseAr2,MB_Merkel_2018_MAReuseArSouth_12mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Assocites,Mission Bay,Sail Bay,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Other,"""In addition to the direct planting, an additional 14.20 acres was planted by depositing eelgrass rich dredge sediment on to the top layers of fills placed within the Sail Bay Reuse Areas 3 and 7. This sediment was derived from dredge areas supporting dense eelgrass but shallow cuts that were deferred to late in the dredging program in order to make use of the high rhizome density present in this sediment as starter material for bed development. These transplant methods are described in the transplant plan (Merkel & Associates 2017).""  "" These reuse areas include two of the Sail Bay borrow sites (Sail Bay Reuse 3 and 7) and Leisure Lagoon.""  - AKA in these three sites, they still planted, but also place rhizome rich sed fill from the dredge in these sites. 

                                
                        
                
        ",NA,Y,"Donor eelgrass for the transplant was derived from eelgrass beds identified throughout Mission Bay. Multiple donor sites were employed in the transplant due both to the large scale of the transplant and the desire to ensure transplants reflected a high diversity of donor eelgrass material within the restored beds. During the transplant, additional donor sites from those initially identified had to be added due to significant losses of donor beds due to wasting disease between the time donor sites were identified in summer 2017 and transplants commenced in spring 2018.",2995,3901,60.8,ND,80,ND,ND,ND,"Ref data from Sail Bay Ref-1 (Fig. 4a) - There were eight total reference areas. In this case, the ref area closest in distance to the restoration area was selected. ",2018,May-June,Spring/Summer,2,"0, 6, 12, 24",12,3.17,ND,"Listed as ""height"" - I am fairly positive this is depth based onthe way reported (eg Table 3) but not 100% sure",ND,ND,1750000,28449,18591,6,56,ND,ND,ND,CEMP defined criteria ,N,Y,"total planted units: 250,000 units (6-8 plants per unit)",Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Y, epiphytic load","There was a red tide they note led to declines. Also, ""This dramatic decline from initial planting was related to a rapid spread of wasting disease in the bay as is discussed and documented in project's PEP Recommendations Memo (M&A 2018b). Wasting disease had commenced spreading in Mission Bay prior to commencement of dredging and continued throughout the summer of 2018""",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MB_Merkel_2018,MB_Merkel_2018_MAReuseAr2,MB_Merkel_2018_MAReuseArSouth_24mo,Grey literature,Merkel & Assocites,Mission Bay,Sail Bay,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Other,"""In addition to the direct planting, an additional 14.20 acres was planted by depositing eelgrass rich dredge sediment on to the top layers of fills placed within the Sail Bay Reuse Areas 3 and 7. This sediment was derived from dredge areas supporting dense eelgrass but shallow cuts that were deferred to late in the dredging program in order to make use of the high rhizome density present in this sediment as starter material for bed development. These transplant methods are described in the transplant plan (Merkel & Associates 2017).""  "" These reuse areas include two of the Sail Bay borrow sites (Sail Bay Reuse 3 and 7) and Leisure Lagoon.""  - AKA in these three sites, they still planted, but also place rhizome rich sed fill from the dredge in these sites. 

                                
                        
                
        ",NA,Y,"Donor eelgrass for the transplant was derived from eelgrass beds identified throughout Mission Bay. Multiple donor sites were employed in the transplant due both to the large scale of the transplant and the desire to ensure transplants reflected a high diversity of donor eelgrass material within the restored beds. During the transplant, additional donor sites from those initially identified had to be added due to significant losses of donor beds due to wasting disease between the time donor sites were identified in summer 2017 and transplants commenced in spring 2018.",2995,40,60.8,ND,38.4,24.1,ND,6.7,"Ref data from Sail Bay Ref-1 (Fig. 4a) - There were eight total reference areas. In this case, the ref area closest in distance to the restoration area was selected. ",2018,May-June,Spring/Summer,2,"0, 6, 12, 24",24,3.17,ND,"Listed as ""height"" - I am fairly positive this is depth based onthe way reported (eg Table 3) but not 100% sure",ND,ND,1750000,28449,21367,6,52.8,23.9,ND,55.8,CEMP defined criteria ,Y,Y,"total planted units: 250,000 units (6-8 plants per unit)",Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Y, epiphytic load","There was a red tide they note led to declines. Also, ""This dramatic decline from initial planting was related to a rapid spread of wasting disease in the bay as is discussed and documented in project's PEP Recommendations Memo (M&A 2018b). Wasting disease had commenced spreading in Mission Bay prior to commencement of dredging and continued throughout the summer of 2018""",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Puget_2016,Puget_DelanoBeach_TestPlot_2016,Puget_DelanoBeach_TestPlot_2016_14mo,Grey literature,WA DNR,Puget Sound,Delano Beach,47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Other,Burlap. Transplant method: used a strip of burlap with holes poked in to and eelgrass woven through. Then they plant the whole strip (5 shoot per strip),The site selection tool integrated a hydrodynamic model and an eelgrass biomass model along with spatially explicit predictive habitat variables and potential stressors to identify suitable restoration sites throughout greater Puget Sound.,N,"3 donor beds used, within the watershed, but ~10-30km away from one another, and ~5-20km away from the tranplant sites (see Fig. 1, pg 9., Tbale 1 pg 10 ). They monitor shoot densities in these in two trasect in May and July 2017 (Table 8 2107), but now when plated or at the times of restoration, so can't really serve as a reference bed in any way with no delta's... ",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Only report shoot densities from 2017 (see table 8, report 1). Don't actually record regular data from the naturl beds, aside from two survey of shoot densities in the donor meadow in one summer",2016,April,Spring,2,"~2, 12, 24 months",14,NA,ND,NA,47.25804,-122.73927,780,39,ND,20,0.025641026,0,ND,NA,None,NA,NA,"I don't understand what the area planted was. Table 4 says 13m2 were planted, but I reported Table 6, which says 39m2 were planted. Just need to make sure this area is consistent with further montoring data for success. Final shoot densities (Table 9, pg 27) were the total shoots divided by the total tranplant area (checks out- ie is on par with tranplnated densities). SDs are 0 b/c they counted every shoot in the plots (relatively small areas). 
Update: clarified by Jeff via emial, see email for details ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Puget_2016,Puget_DelanoBeach_TestPlot_2016,Puget_DelanoBeach_TestPlot_2016_26mo,Grey literature,WA DNR,Puget Sound,Delano Beach,47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Other,Burlap. Transplant method: used a strip of burlap with holes poked in to and eelgrass woven through. Then they plant the whole strip (5 shoot per strip),NA,N,"3 donor beds used, within the watershed, but ~10-30km away from one another, and ~5-20km away from the tranplant sites (see Fig. 1, pg 9., Tbale 1 pg 10 ). They monitor shoot densities in these in two trasect in May and July 2017 (Table 8 2107), but now when plated or at the times of restoration, so can't really serve as a reference bed in any way with no delta's... ",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Only report shoot densities from 2017 (see table 8, report 1). Don't actually record regular data from the naturl beds, aside from two survey of shoot densities in the donor meadow in one summer",2016,April,Spring,2,"~2, 12, 24 months",26,NA,ND,NA,47.25804,-122.73927,780,39,ND,20,0,0,ND,NA,None,NA,NA,"I don't understand what the area planted was. Table 4 says 13m2 were planted, but I reported Table 6, which says 39m2 were planted. Just need to make sure this area is consistent with further montoring data for success. Final shoot densities (Table 9, pg 27) were the total shoots divided by the total tranplant area (checks out- ie is on par with tranplnated densities). SDs are 0 b/c they counted every shoot in the plots (relatively small areas)",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Puget_2016,Puget_JoemmaBeachSPNorth_TestPlot_2016,Puget_JoemmaBeachSPNorth_TestPlot_2016_14mo,Grey literature,WA DNR,Puget Sound,Joemma Beach State Park,47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Other,Burlap. Transplant method: used a strip of burlap with holes poked in to and eelgrass woven through. Then they plant the whole strip (5 shoot per strip),The site selection tool integrated a hydrodynamic model and an eelgrass biomass model along with spatially explicit predictive habitat variables and potential stressors to identify suitable restoration sites throughout greater Puget Sound.,N,"3 donor beds used, within the watershed, but ~10-30km away from one another, and ~5-20km away from the tranplant sites (see Fig. 1, pg 9., Tbale 1 pg 10 ). They monitor shoot densities in these in two trasect in May and July 2017 (Table 8 2107), but now when plated or at the times of restoration, so can't really serve as a reference bed in any way with no delta's...",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Only report shoot densities from 2017 (see table 8, report 1). Don't actually record regular data from the naturl beds, aside from two survey of shoot densities in the donor meadow in one summer",2016,May,Spring,2,"~2, 12, 24 months",14,NA,ND,NA,47.22589,-122.81332,780,39,ND,20,13.51282051,0,ND,NA,None,NA,NA,"Total area planted is 39m2, which resutls from 3 planted 'plots' each of which are 13m2 (see fig. 7). The total (39m2) is reported here). Therefore the total shoots (780) is reported (NOT the per plot tranplant, which is 260 per plot). Just need to make sure this area is consistent with further montoring data for success. Final shoot densities (Table 9, pg 27) were the total shoots divided by the total tranplant area (checks out- ie is on par with tranplnated densities). SDs are 0 b/c they counted every shoot in the plots (relatively small areas). Evidence of trampling, in shallow area with geoduck harvest. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Puget_2016,Puget_JoemmaBeachSPNorth_TestPlot_2016,Puget_JoemmaBeachSPNorth_TestPlot_2016_26mo,Grey literature,WA DNR,Puget Sound,Joemma Beach State Park,47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Other,Burlap. Transplant method: used a strip of burlap with holes poked in to and eelgrass woven through. Then they plant the whole strip (5 shoot per strip),NA,N,"3 donor beds used, within the watershed, but ~10-30km away from one another, and ~5-20km away from the tranplant sites (see Fig. 1, pg 9., Tbale 1 pg 10 ). They monitor shoot densities in these in two trasect in May and July 2017 (Table 8 2107), but now when plated or at the times of restoration, so can't really serve as a reference bed in any way with no delta's...",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Only report shoot densities from 2017 (see table 8, report 1). Don't actually record regular data from the naturl beds, aside from two survey of shoot densities in the donor meadow in one summer",2016,May,Spring,2,"~2, 12, 24 months",26,NA,ND,NA,47.22589,-122.81332,780,39,ND,20,0,0,ND,NA,None,NA,NA,"Total area planted is 39m2, which resutls from 3 planted 'plots' each of which are 13m2 (see fig. 7). The total (39m2) is reported here). Therefore the total shoots (780) is reported (NOT the per plot tranplant, which is 260 per plot). Just need to make sure this area is consistent with further montoring data for success. Final shoot densities (Table 9, pg 27) were the total shoots divided by the total tranplant area (checks out- ie is on par with tranplnated densities). SDs are 0 b/c they counted every shoot in the plots (relatively small areas). Evidence of trampling, in shallow area with geoduck harvest. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Puget_2016,Puget_TaylorBay_TestPlot_2016,Puget_TaylorBay_TestPlot_2016_14mo,Grey literature,WA DNR,Puget Sound,Taylor Bay,47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Other,Burlap. Transplant method: used a strip of burlap with holes poked in to and eelgrass woven through. Then they plant the whole strip (5 shoot per strip),The site selection tool integrated a hydrodynamic model and an eelgrass biomass model along with spatially explicit predictive habitat variables and potential stressors to identify suitable restoration sites throughout greater Puget Sound.,N,"3 donor beds used, within the watershed, but ~10-30km away from one another, and ~5-20km away from the tranplant sites (see Fig. 1, pg 9., Tbale 1 pg 10 ). They monitor shoot densities in these in two trasect in May and July 2017 (Table 8 2107), but now when plated or at the times of restoration, so can't really serve as a reference bed in any way with no delta's...",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Only report shoot densities from 2017 (see table 8, report 1). Don't actually record regular data from the naturl beds, aside from two survey of shoot densities in the donor meadow in one summer",2016,May,Spring,2,"~2, 12, 24 months",14,NA,ND,NA,47.18309,-122.77779,780,39,ND,20,0,0,ND,NA,None,NA,NA,"Total area planted is 39m2, which resutls from 3 planted 'plots' each of which are 13m2 (see fig. 7). The total (39m2) is reported here). Therefore the total shoots (780) is reported (NOT the per plot tranplant, which is 260 per plot). Just need to make sure this area is consistent with further montoring data for success. Final shoot densities (Table 9, pg 27) were the total shoots divided by the total tranplant area (checks out- ie is on par with tranplnated densities). SDs are 0 b/c they counted every shoot in the plots (relatively small areas)",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Puget_2016,Puget_PenroseSP_TestPlot_2016,Puget_PenroseSP_TestPlot_2016_14mo,Grey literature,WA DNR,Puget Sound,Penrose State Park,47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Other,Burlap. Transplant method: used a strip of burlap with holes poked in to and eelgrass woven through. Then they plant the whole strip (5 shoot per strip),The site selection tool integrated a hydrodynamic model and an eelgrass biomass model along with spatially explicit predictive habitat variables and potential stressors to identify suitable restoration sites throughout greater Puget Sound.,N,"3 donor beds used, within the watershed, but ~10-30km away from one another, and ~5-20km away from the tranplant sites (see Fig. 1, pg 9., Tbale 1 pg 10 ). They monitor shoot densities in these in two trasect in May and July 2017 (Table 8 2107), but now when plated or at the times of restoration, so can't really serve as a reference bed in any way with no delta's...",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Only report shoot densities from 2017 (see table 8, report 1). Don't actually record regular data from the naturl beds, aside from two survey of shoot densities in the donor meadow in one summer",2016,May,Spring,2,"~2, 12, 24 months",14,NA,ND,NA,47.26407,-122.73926,780,39,ND,20,0.102564103,0,ND,NA,None,NA,NA,"Total area planted is 39m2, which resutls from 3 planted 'plots' each of which are 13m2 (see fig. 7). The total (39m2) is reported here). Therefore the total shoots (780) is reported (NOT the per plot tranplant, which is 260 per plot).  Just need to make sure this area is consistent with further montoring data for success. SDs are 0 b/c they counted every shoot in the plots (relatively small areas)",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Puget_2017,Puget_JoemmaBeachSPNorth1_TestPlot_2017,Puget_JoemmaBeachSPNorth1_TestPlot_2017_2mo,Grey literature,WA DNR,Puget Sound,Joemma Beach State Park,47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,TERF,The site selection tool integrated a hydrodynamic model and an eelgrass biomass model along with spatially explicit predictive habitat variables and potential stressors to identify suitable restoration sites throughout greater Puget Sound.,N,"3 donor beds used, within the watershed, but ~10-30km away from one another, and ~5-20km away from the tranplant sites (see Fig. 1, pg 9., Tbale 1 pg 10 ). They monitor shoot densities in these in two trasect in May and July 2017 (Table 8 2107), but now when plated or at the times of restoration, so can't really serve as a reference bed in any way with no delta's...",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Only report shoot densities from 2017 (see table 8, report 1). Don't actually record regular data from the naturl beds, aside from two survey of shoot densities in the donor meadow in one summer",2017,May,Spring,1,"~2, 12 months",2,NA,ND,NA,47.22627,-122.81467,1042,39,ND,27,6.794871795,0,ND,NA,None,NA,NA,"Total area planted is 39m2, which resutls from 3 planted 'plots' each of which are 13m2 (see fig. 7). The total (39m2) is reported here). Therefore the total shoots (780) is reported (NOT the per plot tranplant, which is 260 per plot). Just need to make sure this area is consistent with further montoring data for success. SDs are 0 b/c they counted every shoot in the plots (relatively small areas)",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Puget_2017,Puget_JoemmaBeachSPNorth2_TestPlot_2017,Puget_JoemmaBeachSPNorth2_TestPlot_2017_2mo,Grey literature,WA DNR,Puget Sound,Joemma Beach State Park,47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,TERF,The site selection tool integrated a hydrodynamic model and an eelgrass biomass model along with spatially explicit predictive habitat variables and potential stressors to identify suitable restoration sites throughout greater Puget Sound.,N,"3 donor beds used, within the watershed, but ~10-30km away from one another, and ~5-20km away from the tranplant sites (see Fig. 1, pg 9., Tbale 1 pg 10 ). They monitor shoot densities in these in two trasect in May and July 2017 (Table 8 2107), but now when plated or at the times of restoration, so can't really serve as a reference bed in any way with no delta's...",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Only report shoot densities from 2017 (see table 8, report 1). Don't actually record regular data from the naturl beds, aside from two survey of shoot densities in the donor meadow in one summer",2017,May,Spring,1,"~2, 12 months",2,NA,ND,NA,47.22632,-122.81497,1052,39,ND,27,12,0,ND,NA,None,NA,NA,"Total area planted is 39m2, which resutls from 3 planted 'plots' each of which are 13m2 (see fig. 7). The total (39m2) is reported here). Therefore the total shoots (780) is reported (NOT the per plot tranplant, which is 260 per plot).  Just need to make sure this area is consistent with further montoring data for success. SDs are 0 b/c they counted every shoot in the plots (relatively small areas)",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Puget_2017,Puget_McDermottPt1_TestPlot_2017,Puget_McDermottPt1_TestPlot_2017_2mo,Grey literature,WA DNR,Puget Sound,McDermott Point,47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,TERF,The site selection tool integrated a hydrodynamic model and an eelgrass biomass model along with spatially explicit predictive habitat variables and potential stressors to identify suitable restoration sites throughout greater Puget Sound.,N,"3 donor beds used, within the watershed, but ~10-30km away from one another, and ~5-20km away from the tranplant sites (see Fig. 1, pg 9., Tbale 1 pg 10 ). They monitor shoot densities in these in two trasect in May and July 2017 (Table 8 2107), but now when plated or at the times of restoration, so can't really serve as a reference bed in any way with no delta's...",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Only report shoot densities from 2017 (see table 8, report 1). Don't actually record regular data from the naturl beds, aside from two survey of shoot densities in the donor meadow in one summer",2017,May,Spring,1,"~2, 12 months",2,NA,ND,NA,47.19868,-122.73923,994,39,ND,25,0,0,ND,NA,None,NA,NA,"Total area planted is 39m2, which resutls from 3 planted 'plots' each of which are 13m2 (see fig. 7). The total (39m2) is reported here). Therefore the total shoots (780) is reported (NOT the per plot tranplant, which is 260 per plot).Just need to make sure this area is consistent with further montoring data for success. SDs are 0 b/c they counted every shoot in the plots (relatively small areas)",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Puget_2017,Puget_McDermottPt2_TestPlot_2017,Puget_McDermottPt2_TestPlot_2017_2mo,Grey literature,WA DNR,Puget Sound,McDermott Point,47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,TERF,The site selection tool integrated a hydrodynamic model and an eelgrass biomass model along with spatially explicit predictive habitat variables and potential stressors to identify suitable restoration sites throughout greater Puget Sound.,N,"3 donor beds used, within the watershed, but ~10-30km away from one another, and ~5-20km away from the tranplant sites (see Fig. 1, pg 9., Tbale 1 pg 10 ). They monitor shoot densities in these in two trasect in May and July 2017 (Table 8 2107), but now when plated or at the times of restoration, so can't really serve as a reference bed in any way with no delta's...",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Only report shoot densities from 2017 (see table 8, report 1). Don't actually record regular data from the naturl beds, aside from two survey of shoot densities in the donor meadow in one summer",2017,May,Spring,1,"~2, 12 months",2,NA,ND,NA,47.19903,-122.73913,998,39,ND,26,0,0,ND,NA,None,NA,NA,"Total area planted is 39m2, which resutls from 3 planted 'plots' each of which are 13m2 (see fig. 7). The total (39m2) is reported here). Therefore the total shoots (780) is reported (NOT the per plot tranplant, which is 260 per plot).  Just need to make sure this area is consistent with further montoring data for success. Therefore, table 10 reports each plots data, so they are summed here and divided over the total area to determine the final shoto denisty over the entire area, not per plot. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Puget_2017,Puget_AndersonIslandWest1_TestPlot_2017,Puget_AndersonIslandWest1_TestPlot_2017_2mo,Grey literature,WA DNR,Puget Sound,Anderson Island West,47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,TERF,The site selection tool integrated a hydrodynamic model and an eelgrass biomass model along with spatially explicit predictive habitat variables and potential stressors to identify suitable restoration sites throughout greater Puget Sound.,N,"3 donor beds used, within the watershed, but ~10-30km away from one another, and ~5-20km away from the tranplant sites (see Fig. 1, pg 9., Tbale 1 pg 10 ). They monitor shoot densities in these in two trasect in May and July 2017 (Table 8 2107), but now when plated or at the times of restoration, so can't really serve as a reference bed in any way with no delta's...",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Only report shoot densities from 2017 (see table 8, report 1). Don't actually record regular data from the naturl beds, aside from two survey of shoot densities in the donor meadow in one summer",2017,May,Spring,1,"~2, 12 months",2,NA,ND,NA,47.18186,-122.71403,869,6,ND,145,39.16666667,ND,ND,NA,None,NA,NA,"Total area planted is 6m2, which resutls from 3 planted 'plots' each of which are 2m2 (see table 4). The total (39m2) is reported here). Therefore the total shoots (869) is reported (NOT the per plot tranplant, which is 289 per plot). Just need to make sure this area is consistent with further montoring data for success. SDs are 0 b/c they counted every shoot in the plots (relatively small areas).  Shoot density SDs are not reported, but I averaged 3 values, so we could calulate. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Puget_2017,Puget_AndersonIslandWest1_TestPlot_2017,Puget_AndersonIslandWest1_TestPlot_2017_12mo,Grey literature,WA DNR,Puget Sound,Anderson Island West,47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,TERF,The site selection tool integrated a hydrodynamic model and an eelgrass biomass model along with spatially explicit predictive habitat variables and potential stressors to identify suitable restoration sites throughout greater Puget Sound.,N,"3 donor beds used, within the watershed, but ~10-30km away from one another, and ~5-20km away from the tranplant sites (see Fig. 1, pg 9., Tbale 1 pg 10 ). They monitor shoot densities in these in two trasect in May and July 2017 (Table 8 2107), but now when plated or at the times of restoration, so can't really serve as a reference bed in any way with no delta's...",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Only report shoot densities from 2017 (see table 8, report 1). Don't actually record regular data from the naturl beds, aside from two survey of shoot densities in the donor meadow in one summer",2017,May,Spring,1,"~2, 12 months",12,NA,ND,NA,47.18186,-122.71403,869,6,ND,145,0,0,ND,NA,None,NA,NA,"Total area planted is 6m2, which resutls from 3 planted 'plots' each of which are 2m2 (see table 4). The total (39m2) is reported here). Therefore the total shoots (869) is reported (NOT the per plot tranplant, which is 289 per plot). Just need to make sure this area is consistent with further montoring data for success. SDs are 0 b/c they counted every shoot in the plots (relatively small areas).  Shoot density SDs are not reported, but I averaged 3 values, so we could calulate. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Puget_2017,Puget_AndersonIslandWest2_TestPlot_2017,Puget_AndersonIslandWest2_TestPlot_2017_2mo,Grey literature,WA DNR,Puget Sound,Anderson Island West,47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,TERF,The site selection tool integrated a hydrodynamic model and an eelgrass biomass model along with spatially explicit predictive habitat variables and potential stressors to identify suitable restoration sites throughout greater Puget Sound.,N,"3 donor beds used, within the watershed, but ~10-30km away from one another, and ~5-20km away from the tranplant sites (see Fig. 1, pg 9., Tbale 1 pg 10 ). They monitor shoot densities in these in two trasect in May and July 2017 (Table 8 2107), but now when plated or at the times of restoration, so can't really serve as a reference bed in any way with no delta's...",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Only report shoot densities from 2017 (see table 8, report 1). Don't actually record regular data from the naturl beds, aside from two survey of shoot densities in the donor meadow in one summer",2017,May,Spring,1,"~2, 12 months",2,NA,ND,NA,47.17693,-122.72505,869,6,ND,145,11.5,ND,ND,NA,None,NA,NA,"Total area planted is 6m2, which resutls from 3 planted 'plots' each of which are 2m2 (see table 4). The total (39m2) is reported here). Therefore the total shoots (869) is reported (NOT the per plot tranplant, which is 289 per plot). Just need to make sure this area is consistent with further montoring data for success. SDs are 0 b/c they counted every shoot in the plots (relatively small areas).  Shoot density SDs are not reported, but I averaged 3 values, so we could calulate. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Puget_2017,Puget_AndersonIslandWest2_TestPlot_2017,Puget_AndersonIslandWest2_TestPlot_2017_12mo,Grey literature,WA DNR,Puget Sound,Anderson Island West,47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,TERF,The site selection tool integrated a hydrodynamic model and an eelgrass biomass model along with spatially explicit predictive habitat variables and potential stressors to identify suitable restoration sites throughout greater Puget Sound.,N,"3 donor beds used, within the watershed, but ~10-30km away from one another, and ~5-20km away from the tranplant sites (see Fig. 1, pg 9., Tbale 1 pg 10 ). They monitor shoot densities in these in two trasect in May and July 2017 (Table 8 2107), but now when plated or at the times of restoration, so can't really serve as a reference bed in any way with no delta's...",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Only report shoot densities from 2017 (see table 8, report 1). Don't actually record regular data from the naturl beds, aside from two survey of shoot densities in the donor meadow in one summer",2017,May,Spring,1,"~2, 12 months",12,NA,ND,NA,47.17693,-122.72505,869,6,ND,145,0,0,ND,NA,None,NA,NA,"Total area planted is 6m2, which resutls from 3 planted 'plots' each of which are 2m2 (see table 4). The total (39m2) is reported here). Therefore the total shoots (869) is reported (NOT the per plot tranplant, which is 289 per plot). Just need to make sure this area is consistent with further montoring data for success. SDs are 0 b/c they counted every shoot in the plots (relatively small areas).  Shoot density SDs are not reported, but I averaged 3 values, so we could calulate. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Puget_2017,Puget_SouthHead1_TestPlot_2017,Puget_SouthHead1_TestPlot_2017,Grey literature,WA DNR,Puget Sound,South Head,47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,TERF,The site selection tool integrated a hydrodynamic model and an eelgrass biomass model along with spatially explicit predictive habitat variables and potential stressors to identify suitable restoration sites throughout greater Puget Sound.,N,"3 donor beds used, within the watershed, but ~10-30km away from one another, and ~5-20km away from the tranplant sites (see Fig. 1, pg 9., Tbale 1 pg 10 ). They monitor shoot densities in these in two trasect in May and July 2017 (Table 8 2107), but now when plated or at the times of restoration, so can't really serve as a reference bed in any way with no delta's...",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Only report shoot densities from 2017 (see table 8, report 1). Don't actually record regular data from the naturl beds, aside from two survey of shoot densities in the donor meadow in one summer",2017,July,Summer,1,"~2, 12 months",NA,NA,ND,NA,47.24985,-122.72317,1172,6,ND,195,ND,0,ND,NA,None,NA,NA,"The South Head and Fudge Points were essentially dropped, and not monitored ever after they were tranplanted (see table 9, report 1). This site had low shoot counts, but they don't spearate the sites out, only report that there were 308 total shoot between the two South Head sites (see Table 5 in report 2, Pg 12)",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Puget_2017,Puget_SouthHead2_TestPlot_2017,Puget_SouthHead2_TestPlot_2017,Grey literature,WA DNR,Puget Sound,South Head,47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,TERF,The site selection tool integrated a hydrodynamic model and an eelgrass biomass model along with spatially explicit predictive habitat variables and potential stressors to identify suitable restoration sites throughout greater Puget Sound.,N,"3 donor beds used, within the watershed, but ~10-30km away from one another, and ~5-20km away from the tranplant sites (see Fig. 1, pg 9., Tbale 1 pg 10 ). They monitor shoot densities in these in two trasect in May and July 2017 (Table 8 2107), but now when plated or at the times of restoration, so can't really serve as a reference bed in any way with no delta's...",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Only report shoot densities from 2017 (see table 8, report 1). Don't actually record regular data from the naturl beds, aside from two survey of shoot densities in the donor meadow in one summer",2017,July,Summer,1,"~2, 12 months",NA,NA,ND,NA,47.24963,-122.72338,1015,6,ND,169,ND,0,ND,NA,None,NA,NA,"The South Head and Fudge Points were essentially dropped, and not monitored ever after they were tranplanted (see table 9, report 1). This site had low shoot counts, but they don't spearate the sites out, only report that there were 308 total shoot between the two South Head sites (see Table 5 in report 2, Pg 12)",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Puget_2017,Puget_FudgePt1_TestPlot_2017,Puget_FudgePt1_TestPlot_2017_12mo,Grey literature,WA DNR,Puget Sound,Fudge Point,47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,TERF,The site selection tool integrated a hydrodynamic model and an eelgrass biomass model along with spatially explicit predictive habitat variables and potential stressors to identify suitable restoration sites throughout greater Puget Sound.,N,"3 donor beds used, within the watershed, but ~10-30km away from one another, and ~5-20km away from the tranplant sites (see Fig. 1, pg 9., Tbale 1 pg 10 ). They monitor shoot densities in these in two trasect in May and July 2017 (Table 8 2107), but now when plated or at the times of restoration, so can't really serve as a reference bed in any way with no delta's...",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Only report shoot densities from 2017 (see table 8, report 1). Don't actually record regular data from the naturl beds, aside from two survey of shoot densities in the donor meadow in one summer",2017,July,Summer,1,"~2, 12 months",12,NA,ND,NA,47.23726,-122.86145,1160,6,ND,193,0,0,ND,NA,None,NA,NA,"I don't understand what the area planted was. Table 4 says 13m2 were planted, but I reported Table 6, which says 39m2 were planted. Just need to make sure this area is consistent with further montoring data for success. The South Head and Fudge Points were essentially dropped, and not monitored every after they were tranplanted (see table 9). SDs are 0 b/c they counted every shoot in the plots (relatively small areas)",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Puget_2017,Puget_FudgePt2_TestPlot_2017,Puget_FudgePt2_TestPlot_2017_12mo,Grey literature,WA DNR,Puget Sound,Fudge Point,47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,TERF,The site selection tool integrated a hydrodynamic model and an eelgrass biomass model along with spatially explicit predictive habitat variables and potential stressors to identify suitable restoration sites throughout greater Puget Sound.,N,"3 donor beds used, within the watershed, but ~10-30km away from one another, and ~5-20km away from the tranplant sites (see Fig. 1, pg 9., Tbale 1 pg 10 ). They monitor shoot densities in these in two trasect in May and July 2017 (Table 8 2107), but now when plated or at the times of restoration, so can't really serve as a reference bed in any way with no delta's...",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Only report shoot densities from 2017 (see table 8, report 1). Don't actually record regular data from the naturl beds, aside from two survey of shoot densities in the donor meadow in one summer",2017,July,Summer,1,"~2, 12 months",12,NA,ND,NA,47.23774,-122.86269,1056,6,ND,175,0,0,ND,NA,None,NA,NA,"I don't understand what the area planted was. Table 4 says 13m2 were planted, but I reported Table 6, which says 39m2 were planted. Just need to make sure this area is consistent with further montoring data for success. The South Head and Fudge Points were essentially dropped, and not monitored every after they were tranplanted (see table 9). SDs are 0 b/c they counted every shoot in the plots (relatively small areas)",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Puget_2017,Puget_FudgePt3_TestPlot_2017,Puget_FudgePt3_TestPlot_2017_12mo,Grey literature,WA DNR,Puget Sound,Fudge Point,47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,Rebar,The site selection tool integrated a hydrodynamic model and an eelgrass biomass model along with spatially explicit predictive habitat variables and potential stressors to identify suitable restoration sites throughout greater Puget Sound.,N,"3 donor beds used, within the watershed, but ~10-30km away from one another, and ~5-20km away from the tranplant sites (see Fig. 1, pg 9., Tbale 1 pg 10 ). They monitor shoot densities in these in two trasect in May and July 2017 (Table 8 2107), but now when plated or at the times of restoration, so can't really serve as a reference bed in any way with no delta's...",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Only report shoot densities from 2017 (see table 8, report 1). Don't actually record regular data from the naturl beds, aside from two survey of shoot densities in the donor meadow in one summer",2017,July,Summer,1,"~2, 12 months",12,NA,ND,NA,47.23726,-122.86145,250,1,ND,250,0,0,ND,NA,None,NA,NA,"I don't understand what the area planted was. Table 4 says 13m2 were planted, but I reported Table 6, which says 39m2 were planted. Just need to make sure this area is consistent with further montoring data for success. The South Head and Fudge Points were essentially dropped, and not monitored every after they were tranplanted (see table 9). SDs are 0 b/c they counted every shoot in the plots (relatively small areas)",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Puget_2016,Puget_DelanoBeach_LargeScale_2016,Puget_DelanoBeach_LargeScale_2016_13mo,Grey literature,WA DNR,Puget Sound,Delano Beach,47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Other,Burlap,The site selection tool integrated a hydrodynamic model and an eelgrass biomass model along with spatially explicit predictive habitat variables and potential stressors to identify suitable restoration sites throughout greater Puget Sound.,N,"3 donor beds used, within the watershed, but ~10-30km away from one another, and ~5-20km away from the tranplant sites (see Fig. 1, pg 9., Tbale 1 pg 10 ). They monitor shoot densities in these in two trasect in May and July 2017 (Table 8 2107), but now when plated or at the times of restoration, so can't really serve as a reference bed in any way with no delta's...",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Only report shoot densities from 2017 (see table 8, report 1). Don't actually record regular data from the naturl beds, aside from two survey of shoot densities in the donor meadow in one summer",2016,June,Summer,2,"~2, 12, 24 months",13,NA,ND,NA,47.25753,-122.7382,20850,210,ND,99,0,0,ND,NA,None,NA,NA,NA,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,N,Y,Y,N,Measure pH and DO (appendix) inside and outslde restored meadows. ,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,Y,ND,ND,ND
Puget_2016,Puget_JoemmeBeachSP1_LargeScale_2016,Puget_JoemmeBeachSP1_LargeScale_2016_12mo,Grey literature,WA DNR,Puget Sound,Joemma Beach State Park,47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Other,Burlap,The site selection tool integrated a hydrodynamic model and an eelgrass biomass model along with spatially explicit predictive habitat variables and potential stressors to identify suitable restoration sites throughout greater Puget Sound.,N,"3 donor beds used, within the watershed, but ~10-30km away from one another, and ~5-20km away from the tranplant sites (see Fig. 1, pg 9., Tbale 1 pg 10 ). They monitor shoot densities in these in two trasect in May and July 2017 (Table 8 2107), but now when plated or at the times of restoration, so can't really serve as a reference bed in any way with no delta's...",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Only report shoot densities from 2017 (see table 8, report 1). Don't actually record regular data from the naturl beds, aside from two survey of shoot densities in the donor meadow in one summer",2016,July,Summer,2,"~2, 12, 24 months",12,NA,ND,NA,47.2218,-122.80988,21460,160,ND,126,168.5,ND,ND,NA,None,NA,NA,NA,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,N,Y,Y,N,Measure pH and DO (appendix) inside and outslde restored meadows. ,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,N/Y,ND,ND,ND
Puget_2016,Puget_JoemmeBeachSP1_LargeScale_2016,Puget_JoemmeBeachSP1_LargeScale_2016_22mo,Grey literature,WA DNR,Puget Sound,Joemma Beach State Park,47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Other,Burlap,The site selection tool integrated a hydrodynamic model and an eelgrass biomass model along with spatially explicit predictive habitat variables and potential stressors to identify suitable restoration sites throughout greater Puget Sound.,N,"3 donor beds used, within the watershed, but ~10-30km away from one another, and ~5-20km away from the tranplant sites (see Fig. 1, pg 9., Tbale 1 pg 10 ). They monitor shoot densities in these in two trasect in May and July 2017 (Table 8 2107), but now when plated or at the times of restoration, so can't really serve as a reference bed in any way with no delta's...",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Only report shoot densities from 2017 (see table 8, report 1). Don't actually record regular data from the naturl beds, aside from two survey of shoot densities in the donor meadow in one summer",2016,July,Summer,2,"~2, 12, 24 months",22,NA,ND,NA,47.2218,-122.80988,21460,160,ND,126,249.7,15.6,ND,NA,None,NA,NA,NA,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,N,Y,Y,N,Measure pH and DO (appendix) inside and outslde restored meadows. ,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,N/Y,ND,ND,ND
Puget_2017,Puget_JoemmeBeachSP2_LargeScale_2017,Puget_JoemmeBeachSP2_LargeScale_2017_12mo,Grey literature,WA DNR,Puget Sound,Joemma Beach State Park,47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,TERF,The site selection tool integrated a hydrodynamic model and an eelgrass biomass model along with spatially explicit predictive habitat variables and potential stressors to identify suitable restoration sites throughout greater Puget Sound.,N,"3 donor beds used, within the watershed, but ~10-30km away from one another, and ~5-20km away from the tranplant sites (see Fig. 1, pg 9., Tbale 1 pg 10 ). They monitor shoot densities in these in two trasect in May and July 2017 (Table 8 2107), but now when plated or at the times of restoration, so can't really serve as a reference bed in any way with no delta's...",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Only report shoot densities from 2017 (see table 8, report 1). Don't actually record regular data from the naturl beds, aside from two survey of shoot densities in the donor meadow in one summer",2017,May,Spring,1,"~2, 12 months",12,NA,ND,NA,47.22145,-122.80969,16570,160,ND,104,158.5,17.8,ND,NA,None,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Puget_2017,Puget_JoemmeBeachSP3_LargeScale_2017,Puget_JoemmeBeachSP3_LargeScale_2017_2mo,Grey literature,WA DNR,Puget Sound,Joemma Beach State Park,47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,TERF,The site selection tool integrated a hydrodynamic model and an eelgrass biomass model along with spatially explicit predictive habitat variables and potential stressors to identify suitable restoration sites throughout greater Puget Sound.,N,"3 donor beds used, within the watershed, but ~10-30km away from one another, and ~5-20km away from the tranplant sites (see Fig. 1, pg 9., Tbale 1 pg 10 ). They monitor shoot densities in these in two trasect in May and July 2017 (Table 8 2107), but now when plated or at the times of restoration, so can't really serve as a reference bed in any way with no delta's...",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Only report shoot densities from 2017 (see table 8, report 1). Don't actually record regular data from the naturl beds, aside from two survey of shoot densities in the donor meadow in one summer",2017,May,Spring,1,"~2, 12 months",2,NA,ND,NA,47.22132,-122.80962,24734,160,ND,160,37.4,3.8,ND,NA,None,NA,NA,"Only report Shoot Density SE (not SD), report 2 pg 11",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Puget_2017,Puget_JoemmeBeachSP3_LargeScale_2017,Puget_JoemmeBeachSP3_LargeScale_2017_12mo,Grey literature,WA DNR,Puget Sound,Joemma Beach State Park,47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,TERF,The site selection tool integrated a hydrodynamic model and an eelgrass biomass model along with spatially explicit predictive habitat variables and potential stressors to identify suitable restoration sites throughout greater Puget Sound.,N,"3 donor beds used, within the watershed, but ~10-30km away from one another, and ~5-20km away from the tranplant sites (see Fig. 1, pg 9., Tbale 1 pg 10 ). They monitor shoot densities in these in two trasect in May and July 2017 (Table 8 2107), but now when plated or at the times of restoration, so can't really serve as a reference bed in any way with no delta's...",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Only report shoot densities from 2017 (see table 8, report 1). Don't actually record regular data from the naturl beds, aside from two survey of shoot densities in the donor meadow in one summer",2017,May,Spring,1,"~2, 12 months",12,NA,ND,NA,47.22132,-122.80962,24734,160,ND,160,266.1,17.9,ND,NA,None,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Puget_2017,Puget_JoemmeBeachSP4_LargeScale_2017,Puget_JoemmeBeachSP4_LargeScale_2017_12mo,Grey literature,WA DNR,Puget Sound,Joemma Beach State Park,47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,TERF,The site selection tool integrated a hydrodynamic model and an eelgrass biomass model along with spatially explicit predictive habitat variables and potential stressors to identify suitable restoration sites throughout greater Puget Sound.,N,"3 donor beds used, within the watershed, but ~10-30km away from one another, and ~5-20km away from the tranplant sites (see Fig. 1, pg 9., Tbale 1 pg 10 ). They monitor shoot densities in these in two trasect in May and July 2017 (Table 8 2107), but now when plated or at the times of restoration, so can't really serve as a reference bed in any way with no delta's...",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Only report shoot densities from 2017 (see table 8, report 1). Don't actually record regular data from the naturl beds, aside from two survey of shoot densities in the donor meadow in one summer",2017,May,Spring,1,"~2, 12 months",12,NA,ND,NA,47.22115,-122.80956,26149,160,ND,163,208.7,16.5,ND,NA,None,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Puget_2017,Puget_AndersonIsSouth1_LargeScale_2017,Puget_AndersonIsSouth1_LargeScale_2017_11mo,Grey literature,WA DNR,Puget Sound,Anderson Island South,47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,TERF,The site selection tool integrated a hydrodynamic model and an eelgrass biomass model along with spatially explicit predictive habitat variables and potential stressors to identify suitable restoration sites throughout greater Puget Sound.,N,"3 donor beds used, within the watershed, but ~10-30km away from one another, and ~5-20km away from the tranplant sites (see Fig. 1, pg 9., Tbale 1 pg 10 ). They monitor shoot densities in these in two trasect in May and July 2017 (Table 8 2107), but now when plated or at the times of restoration, so can't really serve as a reference bed in any way with no delta's...",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Only report shoot densities from 2017 (see table 8, report 1). Don't actually record regular data from the naturl beds, aside from two survey of shoot densities in the donor meadow in one summer",2017,June,Summer,1,"~2, 12 months",11,NA,ND,NA,47.13892,-122.72556,20500,160,ND,132,0,0,ND,NA,None,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Puget_2017,Puget_AndersonIsSouth2_LargeScale_2017,Puget_AndersonIsSouth2_LargeScale_2017_11mo,Grey literature,WA DNR,Puget Sound,Anderson Island South,47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,TERF,The site selection tool integrated a hydrodynamic model and an eelgrass biomass model along with spatially explicit predictive habitat variables and potential stressors to identify suitable restoration sites throughout greater Puget Sound.,N,"3 donor beds used, within the watershed, but ~10-30km away from one another, and ~5-20km away from the tranplant sites (see Fig. 1, pg 9., Tbale 1 pg 10 ). They monitor shoot densities in these in two trasect in May and July 2017 (Table 8 2107), but now when plated or at the times of restoration, so can't really serve as a reference bed in any way with no delta's...",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Only report shoot densities from 2017 (see table 8, report 1). Don't actually record regular data from the naturl beds, aside from two survey of shoot densities in the donor meadow in one summer",2017,June,Summer,1,"~2, 12 months",11,NA,ND,NA,47.13844,-122.72417,24830,160,ND,155,ND,ND,ND,NA,None,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
RuesinkWillapa_2018,Willapa_RiverSite_AnnualSource_Bare,Willapa_RiverSite_AnnualSource_Bare_2.5mo,Peer-review,University of Washington,Willapa Bay,River,46.6,-124,WA,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Unanchored,Direct transplants into a small sediment trough,"River sites were originally planted in late may, but strong tides ripped almost all shoots out (90%), so these sites were replanted in June. ",N,"Study was to test the effects of the donor beds, and found that the transplants were morphologically plastic (ie donor site didn't dictate the shoot hieght, production, survival after 3 mo)",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,2016,June,Summer,0.25,3 months,2.5,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,10,5,ND,2,1,0,ND,NA,None,NA,NA,"Transplants were done 0.5 apart along a m5 transect tape. Therefore, area is 5m2 (1X5m), with 10 total shoots in each area, so a 2msq transplant density. The total recovered shoots (counted when monitored) was divided by 5m2 to get ""post"" shoot densities. Data were pulled from Fig. 2 in MS. Note also- they do have some canopy data but did not pull that here currently. ",N,Y,Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,Blue carbon at site level evaluated,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,Y (Productivity and % Organic Content)
RuesinkWillapa_2018,Willapa_RiverSite_AnnualSource_Eelgrass,Willapa_RiverSite_AnnualSource_Eelgrass_2.5mo,Peer-review,University of Washington,Willapa Bay,River,46.6,-124,WA,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Unanchored,Direct transplants into a small sediment trough,"River sites were originally planted in late may, but strong tides ripped almost all shoots out (90%), so these sites were replanted in June. ",N,"Study was to test the effects of the donor beds, and found that the transplants were morphologically plastic (ie donor site didn't dictate the shoot hieght, production, survival after 3 mo)",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,2016,June,Summer,0.25,3 months,2.5,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,10,5,ND,2,0.6,0,ND,NA,None,NA,NA,"Transplants were done 0.5 apart along a m5 transect tape. Therefore, area is 5m2 (1X5m), with 10 total shoots in each area, so a 2msq transplant density. The total recovered shoots (counted when monitored) was divided by 5m2 to get ""post"" shoot densities. Data were pulled from Fig. 2 in MS",N,Y,Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,Blue carbon at site level evaluated,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,Y (Productivity and % Organic Content)
RuesinkWillapa_2018,Willapa_RiverSite_OceanSource_Bare,Willapa_RiverSite_OceanSource_Bare_2.5mo,Peer-review,University of Washington,Willapa Bay,River,46.6,-124,WA,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Unanchored,Direct transplants into a small sediment trough,"River sites were originally planted in late may, but strong tides ripped almost all shoots out (90%), so these sites were replanted in June. ",N,"Study was to test the effects of the donor beds, and found that the transplants were morphologically plastic (ie donor site didn't dictate the shoot hieght, production, survival after 3 mo)",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,2016,June,Summer,0.25,3 months,2.5,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,10,5,ND,2,1.8,0,ND,NA,None,NA,NA,"Transplants were done 0.5 apart along a m5 transect tape. Therefore, area is 5m2 (1X5m), with 10 total shoots in each area, so a 2msq transplant density. The total recovered shoots (counted when monitored) was divided by 5m2 to get ""post"" shoot densities. Data were pulled from Fig. 2 in MS",N,Y,Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,Blue carbon at site level evaluated,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,Y (Productivity and % Organic Content)
RuesinkWillapa_2018,Willapa_RiverSite_OceanSource_Eelgrass,Willapa_RiverSite_OceanSource_Eelgrass_2.5mo,Peer-review,University of Washington,Willapa Bay,River,46.6,-124,WA,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Unanchored,Direct transplants into a small sediment trough,"River sites were originally planted in late may, but strong tides ripped almost all shoots out (90%), so these sites were replanted in June. ",N,"Study was to test the effects of the donor beds, and found that the transplants were morphologically plastic (ie donor site didn't dictate the shoot hieght, production, survival after 3 mo)",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,2016,June,Summer,0.25,3 months,2.5,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,10,5,ND,2,2,0,ND,NA,None,NA,NA,"Transplants were done 0.5 apart along a m5 transect tape. Therefore, area is 5m2 (1X5m), with 10 total shoots in each area, so a 2msq transplant density. The total recovered shoots (counted when monitored) was divided by 5m2 to get ""post"" shoot densities. Data were pulled from Fig. 2 in MS",N,Y,Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,Blue carbon at site level evaluated,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,Y (Productivity and % Organic Content)
RuesinkWillapa_2018,Willapa_RiverSite_MidbaySource_Bare,Willapa_RiverSite_MidbaySource_Bare_2.5mo,Peer-review,University of Washington,Willapa Bay,River,46.6,-124,WA,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Unanchored,Direct transplants into a small sediment trough,"River sites were originally planted in late may, but strong tides ripped almost all shoots out (90%), so these sites were replanted in June. ",N,"Study was to test the effects of the donor beds, and found that the transplants were morphologically plastic (ie donor site didn't dictate the shoot hieght, production, survival after 3 mo)",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,2016,June,Summer,0.25,3 months,2.5,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,10,5,ND,2,0.8,0,ND,NA,None,NA,NA,"Transplants were done 0.5 apart along a m5 transect tape. Therefore, area is 5m2 (1X5m), with 10 total shoots in each area, so a 2msq transplant density. The total recovered shoots (counted when monitored) was divided by 5m2 to get ""post"" shoot densities. Data were pulled from Fig. 2 in MS",N,Y,Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,Blue carbon at site level evaluated,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,Y (Productivity and % Organic Content)
RuesinkWillapa_2018,Willapa_RiverSite_MidbaySource_Eelgrass,Willapa_RiverSite_MidbaySource_Eelgrass_2.5mo,Peer-review,University of Washington,Willapa Bay,River,46.6,-124,WA,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Unanchored,Direct transplants into a small sediment trough,"River sites were originally planted in late may, but strong tides ripped almost all shoots out (90%), so these sites were replanted in June. ",N,"Study was to test the effects of the donor beds, and found that the transplants were morphologically plastic (ie donor site didn't dictate the shoot hieght, production, survival after 3 mo)",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,2016,June,Summer,0.25,3 months,2.5,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,10,5,ND,2,1.2,0,ND,NA,None,NA,NA,"Transplants were done 0.5 apart along a m5 transect tape. Therefore, area is 5m2 (1X5m), with 10 total shoots in each area, so a 2msq transplant density. The total recovered shoots (counted when monitored) was divided by 5m2 to get ""post"" shoot densities. Data were pulled from Fig. 2 in MS",N,Y,Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,Blue carbon at site level evaluated,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,Y (Productivity and % Organic Content)
RuesinkWillapa_2018,Willapa_RiverSite_RiverSource_Bare,Willapa_RiverSite_RiverSource_Bare_2.5mo,Peer-review,University of Washington,Willapa Bay,River,46.6,-124,WA,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Unanchored,Direct transplants into a small sediment trough,"River sites were originally planted in late may, but strong tides ripped almost all shoots out (90%), so these sites were replanted in June. ",N,"Study was to test the effects of the donor beds, and found that the transplants were morphologically plastic (ie donor site didn't dictate the shoot hieght, production, survival after 3 mo)",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,2016,June,Summer,0.25,3 months,2.5,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,10,5,ND,2,1.6,0,ND,NA,None,NA,NA,"Transplants were done 0.5 apart along a m5 transect tape. Therefore, area is 5m2 (1X5m), with 10 total shoots in each area, so a 2msq transplant density. The total recovered shoots (counted when monitored) was divided by 5m2 to get ""post"" shoot densities. Data were pulled from Fig. 2 in MS",N,Y,Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,Blue carbon at site level evaluated,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,Y (Productivity and % Organic Content)
RuesinkWillapa_2018,Willapa_RiverSite_RiverSource_Eelgrass,Willapa_RiverSite_RiverSource_Eelgrass_2.5mo,Peer-review,University of Washington,Willapa Bay,River,46.6,-124,WA,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Unanchored,Direct transplants into a small sediment trough,"River sites were originally planted in late may, but strong tides ripped almost all shoots out (90%), so these sites were replanted in June. ",N,"Study was to test the effects of the donor beds, and found that the transplants were morphologically plastic (ie donor site didn't dictate the shoot hieght, production, survival after 3 mo)",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,2016,June,Summer,0.25,3 months,2.5,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,10,5,ND,2,1,0,ND,NA,None,NA,NA,"Transplants were done 0.5 apart along a m5 transect tape. Therefore, area is 5m2 (1X5m), with 10 total shoots in each area, so a 2msq transplant density. The total recovered shoots (counted when monitored) was divided by 5m2 to get ""post"" shoot densities. Data were pulled from Fig. 2 in MS",N,Y,Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,Blue carbon at site level evaluated,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,Y (Productivity and % Organic Content)
RuesinkWillapa_2018,Willapa_MidbaySite_AnnualSource_Bare,Willapa_MidbaySite_AnnualSource_Bare_2.5mo,Peer-review,University of Washington,Willapa Bay,Midbay,46.6,-124,WA,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Unanchored,Direct transplants into a small sediment trough,NA,N,"Study was to test the effects of the donor beds, and found that the transplants were morphologically plastic (ie donor site didn't dictate the shoot hieght, production, survival after 3 mo)",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,2016,May,Summer,0.25,3 months,2.5,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,10,5,ND,2,0.2,0,ND,NA,None,NA,NA,"Transplants were done 0.5 apart along a m5 transect tape. Therefore, area is 5m2 (1X5m), with 10 total shoots in each area, so a 2msq transplant density. The total recovered shoots (counted when monitored) was divided by 5m2 to get ""post"" shoot densities. Data were pulled from Fig. 2 in MS",N,Y,Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,Blue carbon at site level evaluated,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,Y (Productivity and % Organic Content)
RuesinkWillapa_2018,Willapa_MidbaySite_AnnualSource_Eelgrass,Willapa_MidbaySite_AnnualSource_Eelgrass_2.5mo,Peer-review,University of Washington,Willapa Bay,Midbay,46.6,-124,WA,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Unanchored,Direct transplants into a small sediment trough,NA,N,"Study was to test the effects of the donor beds, and found that the transplants were morphologically plastic (ie donor site didn't dictate the shoot hieght, production, survival after 3 mo)",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,2016,May,Summer,0.25,3 months,2.5,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,10,5,ND,2,0,0,ND,NA,None,NA,NA,"Transplants were done 0.5 apart along a m5 transect tape. Therefore, area is 5m2 (1X5m), with 10 total shoots in each area, so a 2msq transplant density. The total recovered shoots (counted when monitored) was divided by 5m2 to get ""post"" shoot densities. Data were pulled from Fig. 2 in MS",N,Y,Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,Blue carbon at site level evaluated,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,Y (Productivity and % Organic Content)
RuesinkWillapa_2018,Willapa_MidbaySite_OceanSource_Bare,Willapa_MidbaySite_OceanSource_Bare_2.5mo,Peer-review,University of Washington,Willapa Bay,Midbay,46.6,-124,WA,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Unanchored,Direct transplants into a small sediment trough,NA,N,"Study was to test the effects of the donor beds, and found that the transplants were morphologically plastic (ie donor site didn't dictate the shoot hieght, production, survival after 3 mo)",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,2016,May,Summer,0.25,3 months,2.5,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,10,5,ND,2,1,0,ND,NA,None,NA,NA,"Transplants were done 0.5 apart along a m5 transect tape. Therefore, area is 5m2 (1X5m), with 10 total shoots in each area, so a 2msq transplant density. The total recovered shoots (counted when monitored) was divided by 5m2 to get ""post"" shoot densities. Data were pulled from Fig. 2 in MS",N,Y,Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,Blue carbon at site level evaluated,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,Y (Productivity and % Organic Content)
RuesinkWillapa_2018,Willapa_MidbaySite_OceanSource_Eelgrass,Willapa_MidbaySite_OceanSource_Eelgrass_2.5mo,Peer-review,University of Washington,Willapa Bay,Midbay,46.6,-124,WA,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Unanchored,Direct transplants into a small sediment trough,NA,N,"Study was to test the effects of the donor beds, and found that the transplants were morphologically plastic (ie donor site didn't dictate the shoot hieght, production, survival after 3 mo)",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,2016,May,Summer,0.25,3 months,2.5,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,10,5,ND,2,1,0,ND,NA,None,NA,NA,"Transplants were done 0.5 apart along a m5 transect tape. Therefore, area is 5m2 (1X5m), with 10 total shoots in each area, so a 2msq transplant density. The total recovered shoots (counted when monitored) was divided by 5m2 to get ""post"" shoot densities. Data were pulled from Fig. 2 in MS",N,Y,Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,Blue carbon at site level evaluated,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,Y (Productivity and % Organic Content)
RuesinkWillapa_2018,Willapa_MidbaySite_MidbaySource_Bare,Willapa_MidbaySite_MidbaySource_Bare_2.5mo,Peer-review,University of Washington,Willapa Bay,Midbay,46.6,-124,WA,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Unanchored,Direct transplants into a small sediment trough,NA,N,"Study was to test the effects of the donor beds, and found that the transplants were morphologically plastic (ie donor site didn't dictate the shoot hieght, production, survival after 3 mo)",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,2016,May,Summer,0.25,3 months,2.5,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,10,5,ND,2,1.2,0,ND,NA,None,NA,NA,"Transplants were done 0.5 apart along a m5 transect tape. Therefore, area is 5m2 (1X5m), with 10 total shoots in each area, so a 2msq transplant density. The total recovered shoots (counted when monitored) was divided by 5m2 to get ""post"" shoot densities. Data were pulled from Fig. 2 in MS",N,Y,Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,Blue carbon at site level evaluated,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,Y (Productivity and % Organic Content)
RuesinkWillapa_2018,Willapa_MidbaySite_MidbaySource_Eelgrass,Willapa_MidbaySite_MidbaySource_Eelgrass_2.5mo,Peer-review,University of Washington,Willapa Bay,Midbay,46.6,-124,WA,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Unanchored,Direct transplants into a small sediment trough,NA,N,"Study was to test the effects of the donor beds, and found that the transplants were morphologically plastic (ie donor site didn't dictate the shoot hieght, production, survival after 3 mo)",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,2016,May,Summer,0.25,3 months,2.5,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,10,5,ND,2,1.4,0,ND,NA,None,NA,NA,"Transplants were done 0.5 apart along a m5 transect tape. Therefore, area is 5m2 (1X5m), with 10 total shoots in each area, so a 2msq transplant density. The total recovered shoots (counted when monitored) was divided by 5m2 to get ""post"" shoot densities. Data were pulled from Fig. 2 in MS",N,Y,Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,Blue carbon at site level evaluated,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,Y (Productivity and % Organic Content)
RuesinkWillapa_2018,Willapa_MidbaySite_RiverSource_Bare,Willapa_MidbaySite_RiverSource_Bare_2.5mo,Peer-review,University of Washington,Willapa Bay,Midbay,46.6,-124,WA,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Unanchored,Direct transplants into a small sediment trough,NA,N,"Study was to test the effects of the donor beds, and found that the transplants were morphologically plastic (ie donor site didn't dictate the shoot hieght, production, survival after 3 mo)",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,2016,May,Summer,0.25,3 months,2.5,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,10,5,ND,2,0.8,0,ND,NA,None,NA,NA,"Transplants were done 0.5 apart along a m5 transect tape. Therefore, area is 5m2 (1X5m), with 10 total shoots in each area, so a 2msq transplant density. The total recovered shoots (counted when monitored) was divided by 5m2 to get ""post"" shoot densities. Data were pulled from Fig. 2 in MS",N,Y,Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,Blue carbon at site level evaluated,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,Y (Productivity and % Organic Content)
RuesinkWillapa_2018,Willapa_MidbaySite_RiverSource_Eelgrass,Willapa_MidbaySite_RiverSource_Eelgrass_2.5mo,Peer-review,University of Washington,Willapa Bay,Midbay,46.6,-124,WA,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Unanchored,Direct transplants into a small sediment trough,NA,N,"Study was to test the effects of the donor beds, and found that the transplants were morphologically plastic (ie donor site didn't dictate the shoot hieght, production, survival after 3 mo)",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,2016,May,Summer,0.25,3 months,2.5,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,10,5,ND,2,0.8,0,ND,NA,None,NA,NA,"Transplants were done 0.5 apart along a m5 transect tape. Therefore, area is 5m2 (1X5m), with 10 total shoots in each area, so a 2msq transplant density. The total recovered shoots (counted when monitored) was divided by 5m2 to get ""post"" shoot densities. Data were pulled from Fig. 2 in MS",N,Y,Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,Blue carbon at site level evaluated,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,Y (Productivity and % Organic Content)
RuesinkWillapa_2018,Willapa_OceanSite_AnnualSource_Bare,Willapa_OceanSite_AnnualSource_Bare_3mo,Peer-review,University of Washington,Willapa Bay,Ocean,46.6,-124,WA,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Unanchored,Direct transplants into a small sediment trough,NA,N,"Study was to test the effects of the donor beds, and found that the transplants were morphologically plastic (ie donor site didn't dictate the shoot hieght, production, survival after 3 mo)",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,2016,May,Spring,0.25,3 months,3,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,10,5,ND,2,0.6,0,ND,NA,None,NA,NA,"Transplants were done 0.5 apart along a m5 transect tape. Therefore, area is 5m2 (1X5m), with 10 total shoots in each area, so a 2msq transplant density. The total recovered shoots (counted when monitored) was divided by 5m2 to get ""post"" shoot densities. Data were pulled from Fig. 2 in MS",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,Blue carbon at site level evaluated,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,Y (Productivity and % Organic Content)
RuesinkWillapa_2018,Willapa_OceanSite_AnnualSource_Eelgrass,Willapa_OceanSite_AnnualSource_Eelgrass_3mo,Peer-review,University of Washington,Willapa Bay,Ocean,46.6,-124,WA,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Unanchored,Direct transplants into a small sediment trough,NA,N,"Study was to test the effects of the donor beds, and found that the transplants were morphologically plastic (ie donor site didn't dictate the shoot hieght, production, survival after 3 mo)",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,2016,May,Spring,0.25,3 months,3,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,10,5,ND,2,0,0,ND,NA,None,NA,NA,"Transplants were done 0.5 apart along a m5 transect tape. Therefore, area is 5m2 (1X5m), with 10 total shoots in each area, so a 2msq transplant density. The total recovered shoots (counted when monitored) was divided by 5m2 to get ""post"" shoot densities. Data were pulled from Fig. 2 in MS",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,Blue carbon at site level evaluated,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,Y (Productivity and % Organic Content)
RuesinkWillapa_2018,Willapa_OceanSite_OceanSource_Bare,Willapa_OceanSite_OceanSource_Bare_3mo,Peer-review,University of Washington,Willapa Bay,Ocean,46.6,-124,WA,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Unanchored,Direct transplants into a small sediment trough,NA,N,"Study was to test the effects of the donor beds, and found that the transplants were morphologically plastic (ie donor site didn't dictate the shoot hieght, production, survival after 3 mo)",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,2016,May,Spring,0.25,3 months,3,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,10,5,ND,2,1,0,ND,NA,None,NA,NA,"Transplants were done 0.5 apart along a m5 transect tape. Therefore, area is 5m2 (1X5m), with 10 total shoots in each area, so a 2msq transplant density. The total recovered shoots (counted when monitored) was divided by 5m2 to get ""post"" shoot densities. Data were pulled from Fig. 2 in MS",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,Blue carbon at site level evaluated,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,Y (Productivity and % Organic Content)
RuesinkWillapa_2018,Willapa_OceanSite_OceanSource_Eelgrass,Willapa_OceanSite_OceanSource_Eelgrass_3mo,Peer-review,University of Washington,Willapa Bay,Ocean,46.6,-124,WA,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Unanchored,Direct transplants into a small sediment trough,NA,N,"Study was to test the effects of the donor beds, and found that the transplants were morphologically plastic (ie donor site didn't dictate the shoot hieght, production, survival after 3 mo)",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,2016,May,Spring,0.25,3 months,3,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,10,5,ND,2,0.8,0,ND,NA,None,NA,NA,"Transplants were done 0.5 apart along a m5 transect tape. Therefore, area is 5m2 (1X5m), with 10 total shoots in each area, so a 2msq transplant density. The total recovered shoots (counted when monitored) was divided by 5m2 to get ""post"" shoot densities. Data were pulled from Fig. 2 in MS",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,Blue carbon at site level evaluated,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,Y (Productivity and % Organic Content)
RuesinkWillapa_2018,Willapa_OceanSite_Midbay_Bare,Willapa_OceanSite_Midbay_Bare_3mo,Peer-review,University of Washington,Willapa Bay,Ocean,46.6,-124,WA,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Unanchored,Direct transplants into a small sediment trough,NA,N,"Study was to test the effects of the donor beds, and found that the transplants were morphologically plastic (ie donor site didn't dictate the shoot hieght, production, survival after 3 mo)",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,2016,May,Spring,0.25,3 months,3,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,10,5,ND,2,1.4,0,ND,NA,None,NA,NA,"Transplants were done 0.5 apart along a m5 transect tape. Therefore, area is 5m2 (1X5m), with 10 total shoots in each area, so a 2msq transplant density. The total recovered shoots (counted when monitored) was divided by 5m2 to get ""post"" shoot densities. Data were pulled from Fig. 2 in MS",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,Blue carbon at site level evaluated,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,Y (Productivity and % Organic Content)
RuesinkWillapa_2018,Willapa_OceanSite_Midbay_Eelgrass,Willapa_OceanSite_Midbay_Eelgrass_3mo,Peer-review,University of Washington,Willapa Bay,Ocean,46.6,-124,WA,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Unanchored,Direct transplants into a small sediment trough,NA,N,"Study was to test the effects of the donor beds, and found that the transplants were morphologically plastic (ie donor site didn't dictate the shoot hieght, production, survival after 3 mo)",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,2016,May,Spring,0.25,3 months,3,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,10,5,ND,2,1,0,ND,NA,None,NA,NA,"Transplants were done 0.5 apart along a m5 transect tape. Therefore, area is 5m2 (1X5m), with 10 total shoots in each area, so a 2msq transplant density. The total recovered shoots (counted when monitored) was divided by 5m2 to get ""post"" shoot densities. Data were pulled from Fig. 2 in MS",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,Blue carbon at site level evaluated,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,Y (Productivity and % Organic Content)
RuesinkWillapa_2018,Willapa_OceanSite_RiverSource_Bare,Willapa_OceanSite_RiverSource_Bare_3mo,Peer-review,University of Washington,Willapa Bay,Ocean,46.6,-124,WA,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Unanchored,Direct transplants into a small sediment trough,NA,N,"Study was to test the effects of the donor beds, and found that the transplants were morphologically plastic (ie donor site didn't dictate the shoot hieght, production, survival after 3 mo)",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,2016,May,Spring,0.25,3 months,3,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,10,5,ND,2,1.2,0,ND,NA,None,NA,NA,"Transplants were done 0.5 apart along a m5 transect tape. Therefore, area is 5m2 (1X5m), with 10 total shoots in each area, so a 2msq transplant density. The total recovered shoots (counted when monitored) was divided by 5m2 to get ""post"" shoot densities. Data were pulled from Fig. 2 in MS",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,Blue carbon at site level evaluated,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,Y (Productivity and % Organic Content)
RuesinkWillapa_2018,Willapa_OceanSite_RiverSource_Eelgrass,Willapa_OceanSite_RiverSource_Eelgrass_3mo,Peer-review,University of Washington,Willapa Bay,Ocean,46.6,-124,WA,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Unanchored,Direct transplants into a small sediment trough,NA,N,"Study was to test the effects of the donor beds, and found that the transplants were morphologically plastic (ie donor site didn't dictate the shoot hieght, production, survival after 3 mo)",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,2016,May,Spring,0.25,3 months,3,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,10,5,ND,2,0.6,0,ND,NA,None,NA,NA,"Transplants were done 0.5 apart along a m5 transect tape. Therefore, area is 5m2 (1X5m), with 10 total shoots in each area, so a 2msq transplant density. The total recovered shoots (counted when monitored) was divided by 5m2 to get ""post"" shoot densities. Data were pulled from Fig. 2 in MS",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,Blue carbon at site level evaluated,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,Y (Productivity and % Organic Content)
RuesinkWillapa_2018,Willapa_AnnualSite_AnnualSource_Bare,Willapa_AnnualSite_AnnualSource_Bare_3mo,Peer-review,University of Washington,Willapa Bay,Ocean_annual,46.6,-124,WA,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Unanchored,Direct transplants into a small sediment trough,NA,N,"Study was to test the effects of the donor beds, and found that the transplants were morphologically plastic (ie donor site didn't dictate the shoot hieght, production, survival after 3 mo)",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,2016,May,Spring,0.25,3 months,3,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,10,5,ND,2,1,0,ND,NA,None,NA,NA,"Transplants were done 0.5 apart along a m5 transect tape. Therefore, area is 5m2 (1X5m), with 10 total shoots in each area, so a 2msq transplant density. The total recovered shoots (counted when monitored) was divided by 5m2 to get ""post"" shoot densities. Data were pulled from Fig. 2 in MS",N,Y,Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,Blue carbon at site level evaluated,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,Y (Productivity and % Organic Content)
RuesinkWillapa_2018,Willapa_AnnualSite_AnnualSource_Eelgrass,Willapa_AnnualSite_AnnualSource_Eelgrass_3mo,Peer-review,University of Washington,Willapa Bay,Ocean_annual,46.6,-124,WA,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Unanchored,Direct transplants into a small sediment trough,NA,N,"Study was to test the effects of the donor beds, and found that the transplants were morphologically plastic (ie donor site didn't dictate the shoot hieght, production, survival after 3 mo)",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,2016,May,Spring,0.25,3 months,3,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,10,5,ND,2,1.2,0,ND,NA,None,NA,NA,"Transplants were done 0.5 apart along a m5 transect tape. Therefore, area is 5m2 (1X5m), with 10 total shoots in each area, so a 2msq transplant density. The total recovered shoots (counted when monitored) was divided by 5m2 to get ""post"" shoot densities. Data were pulled from Fig. 2 in MS",N,Y,Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,Blue carbon at site level evaluated,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,Y (Productivity and % Organic Content)
RuesinkWillapa_2018,Willapa_AnnualSite_OceanSource_Bare,Willapa_AnnualSite_OceanSource_Bare_3mo,Peer-review,University of Washington,Willapa Bay,Ocean_annual,46.6,-124,WA,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Unanchored,Direct transplants into a small sediment trough,NA,N,"Study was to test the effects of the donor beds, and found that the transplants were morphologically plastic (ie donor site didn't dictate the shoot hieght, production, survival after 3 mo)",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,2016,May,Spring,0.25,3 months,3,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,10,5,ND,2,1.4,0,ND,NA,None,NA,NA,"Transplants were done 0.5 apart along a m5 transect tape. Therefore, area is 5m2 (1X5m), with 10 total shoots in each area, so a 2msq transplant density. The total recovered shoots (counted when monitored) was divided by 5m2 to get ""post"" shoot densities. Data were pulled from Fig. 2 in MS",N,Y,Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,Blue carbon at site level evaluated,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,Y (Productivity and % Organic Content)
RuesinkWillapa_2018,Willapa_AnnualSite_OceanSource_Eelgrass,Willapa_AnnualSite_OceanSource_Eelgrass_3mo,Peer-review,University of Washington,Willapa Bay,Ocean_annual,46.6,-124,WA,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Unanchored,Direct transplants into a small sediment trough,NA,N,"Study was to test the effects of the donor beds, and found that the transplants were morphologically plastic (ie donor site didn't dictate the shoot hieght, production, survival after 3 mo)",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,2016,May,Spring,0.25,3 months,3,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,10,5,ND,2,1.2,0,ND,NA,None,NA,NA,"Transplants were done 0.5 apart along a m5 transect tape. Therefore, area is 5m2 (1X5m), with 10 total shoots in each area, so a 2msq transplant density. The total recovered shoots (counted when monitored) was divided by 5m2 to get ""post"" shoot densities. Data were pulled from Fig. 2 in MS",N,Y,Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,Blue carbon at site level evaluated,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,Y (Productivity and % Organic Content)
RuesinkWillapa_2018,Willapa_AnnualSite_Midbay_Bare,Willapa_AnnualSite_Midbay_Bare_3mo,Peer-review,University of Washington,Willapa Bay,Ocean_annual,46.6,-124,WA,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Unanchored,Direct transplants into a small sediment trough,NA,N,"Study was to test the effects of the donor beds, and found that the transplants were morphologically plastic (ie donor site didn't dictate the shoot hieght, production, survival after 3 mo)",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,2016,May,Spring,0.25,3 months,3,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,10,5,ND,2,1,0,ND,NA,None,NA,NA,"Transplants were done 0.5 apart along a m5 transect tape. Therefore, area is 5m2 (1X5m), with 10 total shoots in each area, so a 2msq transplant density. The total recovered shoots (counted when monitored) was divided by 5m2 to get ""post"" shoot densities. Data were pulled from Fig. 2 in MS",N,Y,Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,Blue carbon at site level evaluated,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,Y (Productivity and % Organic Content)
RuesinkWillapa_2018,Willapa_AnnualSite_Midbay_Eelgrass,Willapa_AnnualSite_Midbay_Eelgrass_3mo,Peer-review,University of Washington,Willapa Bay,Ocean_annual,46.6,-124,WA,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Unanchored,Direct transplants into a small sediment trough,NA,N,"Study was to test the effects of the donor beds, and found that the transplants were morphologically plastic (ie donor site didn't dictate the shoot hieght, production, survival after 3 mo)",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,2016,May,Spring,0.25,3 months,3,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,10,5,ND,2,1.2,0,ND,NA,None,NA,NA,"Transplants were done 0.5 apart along a m5 transect tape. Therefore, area is 5m2 (1X5m), with 10 total shoots in each area, so a 2msq transplant density. The total recovered shoots (counted when monitored) was divided by 5m2 to get ""post"" shoot densities. Data were pulled from Fig. 2 in MS",N,Y,Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,Blue carbon at site level evaluated,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,Y (Productivity and % Organic Content)
RuesinkWillapa_2018,Willapa_AnnualSite_RiverSource_Bare,Willapa_AnnualSite_RiverSource_Bare_3mo,Peer-review,University of Washington,Willapa Bay,Ocean_annual,46.6,-124,WA,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Unanchored,Direct transplants into a small sediment trough,NA,N,"Study was to test the effects of the donor beds, and found that the transplants were morphologically plastic (ie donor site didn't dictate the shoot hieght, production, survival after 3 mo)",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,2016,May,Spring,0.25,3 months,3,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,10,5,ND,2,1.6,0,ND,NA,None,NA,NA,"Transplants were done 0.5 apart along a m5 transect tape. Therefore, area is 5m2 (1X5m), with 10 total shoots in each area, so a 2msq transplant density. The total recovered shoots (counted when monitored) was divided by 5m2 to get ""post"" shoot densities. Data were pulled from Fig. 2 in MS",N,Y,Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,Blue carbon at site level evaluated,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,Y (Productivity and % Organic Content)
RuesinkWillapa_2018,Willapa_AnnualSite_RiverSource_Eelgrass,Willapa_AnnualSite_RiverSource_Eelgrass_3mo,Peer-review,University of Washington,Willapa Bay,Ocean_annual,46.6,-124,WA,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Unanchored,Direct transplants into a small sediment trough,NA,N,"Study was to test the effects of the donor beds, and found that the transplants were morphologically plastic (ie donor site didn't dictate the shoot hieght, production, survival after 3 mo)",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,2016,May,Spring,0.25,3 months,3,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,10,5,ND,2,1.6,0,ND,NA,None,NA,NA,"Transplants were done 0.5 apart along a m5 transect tape. Therefore, area is 5m2 (1X5m), with 10 total shoots in each area, so a 2msq transplant density. The total recovered shoots (counted when monitored) was divided by 5m2 to get ""post"" shoot densities. Data were pulled from Fig. 2 in MS",N,Y,Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,Blue carbon at site level evaluated,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,Y (Productivity and % Organic Content)
Siuslaw_2008,Siuslaw_NorthSiteShallow_2008,Siuslaw_NorthSiteShallow_2008_1yr,NA,"Oregon Department of Transportation, SSNERR, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Siuslaw ,North Site-Shallow: Hwy 126 Bridge Replacement Site,43.97,-124.09,OR,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Plug",Sod & EPUs,"They used a combination of approaches, EPUs (bare root shoots tied to rebar, anchored by bamboo) and SOD technique where 10-15 shoots and rhizomes (WITH sediment) were secured to ""X"" shaped rebar and placed in mud)",Y,Seagrass that was in shadow of planned bridge construction was transplanted/relocated; so donor bed is same as site bed,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Adendum notes that both South and North Sites had increased cover and shoot densities; ""robust and health""",2008,June,Summer,10,12 months,12,1.5,ND,"""shallow""",ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,9.5,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Meeting mitigation ratio, ratio=met",ND,ND,"Initial densities transplanted was calculated by taking both techniques and the range of possible densities (5-8 and 10-15) and dividing it by 4 to get 9.5 AND plots are smaller than 1msq but spaced 1m apart so they have a shoot density, though clumped of 9.5/m2, South Site transplanted area blended into natural meadows which were 1.989 acres in total by 2016; restored plots were indistinguishable from natural meadow by 2014 so we reported the most recent delineated value (0.1224 acres)",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,Native tribe that utilizes teh channel and the watershed have long term water quality data ,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Siuslaw_2008,Siuslaw_NorthSiteMid_2008,Siuslaw_NorthSiteMid_2008_1yr,NA,"Oregon Department of Transportation, SSNERR, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Siuslaw ,North Site-Mid: Hwy 126 Bridge Replacement Site,43.97,-124.09,OR,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Plug",Sod & EPUs,"They used a combination of approaches, EPUs (bare root shoots tied to rebar, anchored by bamboo) and SOD technique where 10-15 shoots and rhizomes (WITH sediment) were secured to ""X"" shaped rebar and placed in mud)",Y,Seagrass that was in shadow of planned bridge construction was transplanted/relocated; so donor bed is same as site bed,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Adendum notes that both South and North Sites had increased cover and shoot densities; ""robust and health""",2008,June,Summer,10,12 months,12,1.5,ND,"""mid""",ND,ND,2700,74.1,97.9,9.5,76.4,16.4,83.2,NA,"Meeting mitigation ratio, ratio=met",Y,Y,"Initial densities transplanted was calculated by taking both techniques and the range of possible densities (5-8 and 10-15) and dividing it by 4 to get 9.5 AND plots are smaller than 1msq but spaced 1m apart so they have a shoot density, though clumped of 9.5/m2, South Site transplanted area blended into natural meadows which were 1.989 acres in total by 2016; restored plots were indistinguishable from natural meadow by 2014 so we reported the most recent delineated value (0.1224 acres)",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,Native tribe that utilizes teh channel and the watershed have long term water quality data ,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Siuslaw_2008,Siuslaw_NorthSiteDeep_2008,Siuslaw_NorthSiteDeep_2008_1yr,NA,"Oregon Department of Transportation, SSNERR, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Siuslaw ,North Site-Deep: Hwy 126 Bridge Replacement Site,43.97,-124.09,OR,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Plug",Sod & EPUs,"They used a combination of approaches, EPUs (bare root shoots tied to rebar, anchored by bamboo) and SOD technique where 10-15 shoots and rhizomes (WITH sediment) were secured to ""X"" shaped rebar and placed in mud)",Y,Seagrass that was in shadow of planned bridge construction was transplanted/relocated; so donor bed is same as site bed,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Adendum notes that both South and North Sites had increased cover and shoot densities; ""robust and health""",2008,June,Summer,10,12 months,12,1.5,ND,"""deep""",ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,9.5,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Meeting mitigation ratio, ratio=met",ND,ND,"Initial densities transplanted was calculated by taking both techniques and the range of possible densities (5-8 and 10-15) and dividing it by 4 to get 9.5 AND plots are smaller than 1msq but spaced 1m apart so they have a shoot density, though clumped of 9.5/m2, South Site transplanted area blended into natural meadows which were 1.989 acres in total by 2016; restored plots were indistinguishable from natural meadow by 2014 so we reported the most recent delineated value (0.1224 acres)",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,Native tribe that utilizes teh channel and the watershed have long term water quality data ,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Siuslaw_2007,Siuslaw_SouthSiteShallow_2007,Siuslaw_SouthSiteShallow_2007_1yr,NA,"Oregon Department of Transportation, SSNERR, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Siuslaw ,South Site-Shallow: Hwy 126 Bridge Replacement Site,43.97,-124.09,OR,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Plug",Sod & EPUs,"They used a combination of approaches, EPUs (bare root shoots tied to rebar, anchored by bamboo) and SOD technique where 10-15 shoots and rhizomes (WITH sediment) were secured to ""X"" shaped rebar and placed in mud)",Y,Seagrass that was in shadow of planned bridge construction was transplanted/relocated; so donor bed is same as site bed,1630.5,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Adendum notes that both South and North Sites had increased cover and shoot densities; ""robust and health""",2007,June,Summer,10,12 months,12,1.5,ND,"""shallow""",ND,ND,300,ND,ND,9.5,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Meeting mitigation ratio, ratio=met",ND,ND,"Initial densities transplanted was calculated by taking both techniques and the range of possible densities (5-8 and 10-15) and dividing it by 4 to get 9.5 AND plots are smaller than 1msq but spaced 1m apart so they have a shoot density, though clumped of 9.5/m2, South Site transplanted area blended into natural meadows which were 1.989 acres in total by 2016; restored plots were indistinguishable from natural meadow by 2014 so we reported the most recent delineated value (0.1224 acres)",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,Native tribe that utilizes teh channel and the watershed have long term water quality data ,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Siuslaw_2007,Siuslaw_SouthSiteMid_2007,Siuslaw_SouthSiteMid_2007_1yr,NA,"Oregon Department of Transportation, SSNERR, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Siuslaw ,South Site-Mid: Hwy 126 Bridge Replacement Site,43.97,-124.09,OR,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Plug",Sod & EPUs,"They used a combination of approaches, EPUs (bare root shoots tied to rebar, anchored by bamboo) and SOD technique where 10-15 shoots and rhizomes (WITH sediment) were secured to ""X"" shaped rebar and placed in mud)",Y,Seagrass that was in shadow of planned bridge construction was transplanted/relocated; so donor bed is same as site bed,1630.5,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Adendum notes that both South and North Sites had increased cover and shoot densities; ""robust and health""",2007,June,Summer,10,12 months,12,1.5,ND,"""mid""",ND,ND,1000,203,503,9.5,76,13.2,ND,NA,"Meeting mitigation ratio, ratio=met",Y,Y,"Initial densities transplanted was calculated by taking both techniques and the range of possible densities (5-8 and 10-15) and dividing it by 4 to get 9.5 AND plots are smaller than 1msq but spaced 1m apart so they have a shoot density, though clumped of 9.5/m2, South Site transplanted area blended into natural meadows which were 1.989 acres in total by 2016; restored plots were indistinguishable from natural meadow by 2014 so we reported the most recent delineated value (0.1224 acres)",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,Native tribe that utilizes teh channel and the watershed have long term water quality data ,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Siuslaw_2007,Siuslaw_SouthSiteDeep_2007,Siuslaw_SouthSiteDeep_2007_1yr,NA,"Oregon Department of Transportation, SSNERR, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Siuslaw ,South Site-Deep: Hwy 126 Bridge Replacement Site,43.97,-124.09,OR,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Plug",Sod & EPUs,"They used a combination of approaches, EPUs (bare root shoots tied to rebar, anchored by bamboo) and SOD technique where 10-15 shoots and rhizomes (WITH sediment) were secured to ""X"" shaped rebar and placed in mud)",Y,Seagrass that was in shadow of planned bridge construction was transplanted/relocated; so donor bed is same as site bed,1630.5,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Adendum notes that both South and North Sites had increased cover and shoot densities; ""robust and health""",2007,June,Summer,10,12 months,12,1.5,ND,"""deep""",ND,ND,1400,ND,ND,9.5,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Meeting mitigation ratio, ratio=met",ND,ND,"Initial densities transplanted was calculated by taking both techniques and the range of possible densities (5-8 and 10-15) and dividing it by 4 to get 9.5 AND plots are smaller than 1msq but spaced 1m apart so they have a shoot density, though clumped of 9.5/m2, South Site transplanted area blended into natural meadows which were 1.989 acres in total by 2016; restored plots were indistinguishable from natural meadow by 2014 so we reported the most recent delineated value (0.1224 acres)",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,Native tribe that utilizes teh channel and the watershed have long term water quality data ,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Siuslaw_2008,Siuslaw_NorthSiteShallow_2008,Siuslaw_NorthSiteShallow_2008_6yr,NA,"Oregon Department of Transportation, SSNERR, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Siuslaw ,North Site-Shallow: Hwy 126 Bridge Replacement Site,43.97,-124.09,OR,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Plug",Sod & EPUs,"They used a combination of approaches, EPUs (bare root shoots tied to rebar, anchored by bamboo) and SOD technique where 10-15 shoots and rhizomes (WITH sediment) were secured to ""X"" shaped rebar and placed in mud)",Y,Seagrass that was in shadow of planned bridge construction was transplanted/relocated; so donor bed is same as site bed,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Adendum notes that both South and North Sites had increased cover and shoot densities; ""robust and health""",2008,June,Summer,10,12 months,72,1.5,ND,"""shallow""",ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,9.5,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Meeting mitigation ratio, ratio=met",ND,ND,"Initial densities transplanted was calculated by taking both techniques and the range of possible densities (5-8 and 10-15) and dividing it by 4 to get 9.5 AND plots are smaller than 1msq but spaced 1m apart so they have a shoot density, though clumped of 9.5/m2, South Site transplanted area blended into natural meadows which were 1.989 acres in total by 2016; restored plots were indistinguishable from natural meadow by 2014 so we reported the most recent delineated value (0.1224 acres)",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,Native tribe that utilizes teh channel and the watershed have long term water quality data ,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Siuslaw_2008,Siuslaw_NorthSiteMid_2008,Siuslaw_NorthSiteMid_2008_6yr,NA,"Oregon Department of Transportation, SSNERR, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Siuslaw ,North Site-Mid: Hwy 126 Bridge Replacement Site,43.97,-124.09,OR,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Plug",Sod & EPUs,"They used a combination of approaches, EPUs (bare root shoots tied to rebar, anchored by bamboo) and SOD technique where 10-15 shoots and rhizomes (WITH sediment) were secured to ""X"" shaped rebar and placed in mud)",Y,Seagrass that was in shadow of planned bridge construction was transplanted/relocated; so donor bed is same as site bed,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Adendum notes that both South and North Sites had increased cover and shoot densities; ""robust and health""",2008,June,Summer,10,12 months,72,1.5,ND,"""mid""",ND,ND,2700,74.1,97.9,9.5,116,13.6,80.8,NA,"Meeting mitigation ratio, ratio=met",Y,Y,"Initial densities transplanted was calculated by taking both techniques and the range of possible densities (5-8 and 10-15) and dividing it by 4 to get 9.5 AND plots are smaller than 1msq but spaced 1m apart so they have a shoot density, though clumped of 9.5/m2, South Site transplanted area blended into natural meadows which were 1.989 acres in total by 2016; restored plots were indistinguishable from natural meadow by 2014 so we reported the most recent delineated value (0.1224 acres)",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,Native tribe that utilizes teh channel and the watershed have long term water quality data ,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Siuslaw_2008,Siuslaw_NorthSiteDeep_2008,Siuslaw_NorthSiteDeep_2008_6yr,NA,"Oregon Department of Transportation, SSNERR, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Siuslaw ,North Site-Deep: Hwy 126 Bridge Replacement Site,43.97,-124.09,OR,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Plug",Sod & EPUs,"They used a combination of approaches, EPUs (bare root shoots tied to rebar, anchored by bamboo) and SOD technique where 10-15 shoots and rhizomes (WITH sediment) were secured to ""X"" shaped rebar and placed in mud)",Y,Seagrass that was in shadow of planned bridge construction was transplanted/relocated; so donor bed is same as site bed,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Adendum notes that both South and North Sites had increased cover and shoot densities; ""robust and health""",2008,June,Summer,10,12 months,72,1.5,ND,"""deep""",ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,9.5,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Meeting mitigation ratio, ratio=met",ND,ND,"Initial densities transplanted was calculated by taking both techniques and the range of possible densities (5-8 and 10-15) and dividing it by 4 to get 9.5 AND plots are smaller than 1msq but spaced 1m apart so they have a shoot density, though clumped of 9.5/m2, South Site transplanted area blended into natural meadows which were 1.989 acres in total by 2016; restored plots were indistinguishable from natural meadow by 2014 so we reported the most recent delineated value (0.1224 acres)",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,Native tribe that utilizes teh channel and the watershed have long term water quality data ,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Siuslaw_2007,Siuslaw_SouthSiteShallow_2007,Siuslaw_SouthSiteShallow_2007_7yr,NA,"Oregon Department of Transportation, SSNERR, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Siuslaw ,South Site-Shallow: Hwy 126 Bridge Replacement Site,43.97,-124.09,OR,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Plug",Sod & EPUs,"They used a combination of approaches, EPUs (bare root shoots tied to rebar, anchored by bamboo) and SOD technique where 10-15 shoots and rhizomes (WITH sediment) were secured to ""X"" shaped rebar and placed in mud)",Y,Seagrass that was in shadow of planned bridge construction was transplanted/relocated; so donor bed is same as site bed,2944.5,3544,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"means restored and reference blended into one so distinguishing became impossible; Adendum notes that both South and North Sites had increased cover and shoot densities; ""robust and health""",2007,June,Summer,10,12 months,84,1.5,ND,"""shallow""",ND,ND,300,ND,ND,9.5,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Meeting mitigation ratio, ratio=met",ND,ND,"Initial densities transplanted was calculated by taking both techniques and the range of possible densities (5-8 and 10-15) and dividing it by 4 to get 9.5 AND plots are smaller than 1msq but spaced 1m apart so they have a shoot density, though clumped of 9.5/m2, South Site transplanted area blended into natural meadows which were 1.989 acres in total by 2016; restored plots were indistinguishable from natural meadow by 2014 so we reported the most recent delineated value (0.1224 acres)",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,Native tribe that utilizes teh channel and the watershed have long term water quality data ,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Siuslaw_2007,Siuslaw_SouthSiteMid_2007,Siuslaw_SouthSiteMid_2007_7yr,NA,"Oregon Department of Transportation, SSNERR, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Siuslaw ,South Site-Mid: Hwy 126 Bridge Replacement Site,43.97,-124.09,OR,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Plug",Sod & EPUs,"They used a combination of approaches, EPUs (bare root shoots tied to rebar, anchored by bamboo) and SOD technique where 10-15 shoots and rhizomes (WITH sediment) were secured to ""X"" shaped rebar and placed in mud)",Y,Seagrass that was in shadow of planned bridge construction was transplanted/relocated; so donor bed is same as site bed,2944.5,3544,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"means restored and reference blended into one so distinguishing became impossible; Adendum notes that both South and North Sites had increased cover and shoot densities; ""robust and health""",2007,June,Summer,10,12 months,84,1.5,ND,"""mid""",ND,ND,1000,203,503,9.5,145.6,10.4,94.2,NA,"Meeting mitigation ratio, ratio=met",Y,Y,"Initial densities transplanted was calculated by taking both techniques and the range of possible densities (5-8 and 10-15) and dividing it by 4 to get 9.5 AND plots are smaller than 1msq but spaced 1m apart so they have a shoot density, though clumped of 9.5/m2, South Site transplanted area blended into natural meadows which were 1.989 acres in total by 2016; restored plots were indistinguishable from natural meadow by 2014 so we reported the most recent delineated value (0.1224 acres)",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,Native tribe that utilizes teh channel and the watershed have long term water quality data ,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Siuslaw_2007,Siuslaw_SouthSiteDeep_2007,Siuslaw_SouthSiteDeep_2007_7yr,NA,"Oregon Department of Transportation, SSNERR, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Siuslaw ,South Site-Deep: Hwy 126 Bridge Replacement Site,43.97,-124.09,OR,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Plug",Sod & EPUs,"They used a combination of approaches, EPUs (bare root shoots tied to rebar, anchored by bamboo) and SOD technique where 10-15 shoots and rhizomes (WITH sediment) were secured to ""X"" shaped rebar and placed in mud)",Y,Seagrass that was in shadow of planned bridge construction was transplanted/relocated; so donor bed is same as site bed,2944.5,3544,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"means restored and reference blended into one so distinguishing became impossible; Adendum notes that both South and North Sites had increased cover and shoot densities; ""robust and health""",2007,June,Summer,10,12 months,84,1.5,ND,"""deep""",ND,ND,1400,ND,ND,9.5,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Meeting mitigation ratio, ratio=met",ND,ND,"Initial densities transplanted was calculated by taking both techniques and the range of possible densities (5-8 and 10-15) and dividing it by 4 to get 9.5 AND plots are smaller than 1msq but spaced 1m apart so they have a shoot density, though clumped of 9.5/m2, South Site transplanted area blended into natural meadows which were 1.989 acres in total by 2016; restored plots were indistinguishable from natural meadow by 2014 so we reported the most recent delineated value (0.1224 acres)",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,Native tribe that utilizes teh channel and the watershed have long term water quality data ,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Siuslaw_2008,Siuslaw_NorthSiteShallow_2008,Siuslaw_NorthSiteShallow_2008_8yr,NA,"Oregon Department of Transportation, SSNERR, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Siuslaw ,North Site-Shallow: Hwy 126 Bridge Replacement Site,43.97,-124.09,OR,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Plug",Sod & EPUs,"They used a combination of approaches, EPUs (bare root shoots tied to rebar, anchored by bamboo) and SOD technique where 10-15 shoots and rhizomes (WITH sediment) were secured to ""X"" shaped rebar and placed in mud)",Y,Seagrass that was in shadow of planned bridge construction was transplanted/relocated; so donor bed is same as site bed,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Adendum notes that both South and North Sites had increased cover and shoot densities; ""robust and health""",2008,June,Summer,10,12 months,96,1.5,ND,"""shallow""",ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,9.5,28,ND,12.2,NA,"Meeting mitigation ratio, ratio=met",ND,Y,"Initial densities transplanted was calculated by taking both techniques and the range of possible densities (5-8 and 10-15) and dividing it by 4 to get 9.5 AND plots are smaller than 1msq but spaced 1m apart so they have a shoot density, though clumped of 9.5/m2, South Site transplanted area blended into natural meadows which were 1.989 acres in total by 2016; restored plots were indistinguishable from natural meadow by 2014 so we reported the most recent delineated value (0.1224 acres)",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,Native tribe that utilizes teh channel and the watershed have long term water quality data ,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Siuslaw_2008,Siuslaw_NorthSiteMid_2008,Siuslaw_NorthSiteMid_2008_8yr,NA,"Oregon Department of Transportation, SSNERR, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Siuslaw ,North Site-Mid: Hwy 126 Bridge Replacement Site,43.97,-124.09,OR,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Plug",Sod & EPUs,"They used a combination of approaches, EPUs (bare root shoots tied to rebar, anchored by bamboo) and SOD technique where 10-15 shoots and rhizomes (WITH sediment) were secured to ""X"" shaped rebar and placed in mud)",Y,Seagrass that was in shadow of planned bridge construction was transplanted/relocated; so donor bed is same as site bed,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Adendum notes that both South and North Sites had increased cover and shoot densities; ""robust and health""",2008,June,Summer,10,12 months,96,1.5,ND,"""mid""",ND,ND,2700,74.1,97.9,9.5,78.8,18.4,46.7,NA,"Meeting mitigation ratio, ratio=met",Y,Y,"Initial densities transplanted was calculated by taking both techniques and the range of possible densities (5-8 and 10-15) and dividing it by 4 to get 9.5 AND plots are smaller than 1msq but spaced 1m apart so they have a shoot density, though clumped of 9.5/m2, South Site transplanted area blended into natural meadows which were 1.989 acres in total by 2016; restored plots were indistinguishable from natural meadow by 2014 so we reported the most recent delineated value (0.1224 acres)",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,Native tribe that utilizes teh channel and the watershed have long term water quality data ,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Siuslaw_2008,Siuslaw_NorthSiteDeep_2008,Siuslaw_NorthSiteDeep_2008_8yr,NA,"Oregon Department of Transportation, SSNERR, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Siuslaw ,North Site-Deep: Hwy 126 Bridge Replacement Site,43.97,-124.09,OR,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Plug",Sod & EPUs,"They used a combination of approaches, EPUs (bare root shoots tied to rebar, anchored by bamboo) and SOD technique where 10-15 shoots and rhizomes (WITH sediment) were secured to ""X"" shaped rebar and placed in mud)",Y,Seagrass that was in shadow of planned bridge construction was transplanted/relocated; so donor bed is same as site bed,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Adendum notes that both South and North Sites had increased cover and shoot densities; ""robust and health""",2008,June,Summer,10,12 months,96,1.5,ND,"""deep""",ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,9.5,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Meeting mitigation ratio, ratio=met",ND,ND,"Initial densities transplanted was calculated by taking both techniques and the range of possible densities (5-8 and 10-15) and dividing it by 4 to get 9.5 AND plots are smaller than 1msq but spaced 1m apart so they have a shoot density, though clumped of 9.5/m2, South Site transplanted area blended into natural meadows which were 1.989 acres in total by 2016; restored plots were indistinguishable from natural meadow by 2014 so we reported the most recent delineated value (0.1224 acres)",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,Native tribe that utilizes teh channel and the watershed have long term water quality data ,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Siuslaw_2007,Siuslaw_SouthSiteShallow_2007,Siuslaw_SouthSiteShallow_2007_9yr,NA,"Oregon Department of Transportation, SSNERR, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Siuslaw ,South Site-Shallow: Hwy 126 Bridge Replacement Site,43.97,-124.09,OR,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Plug",Sod & EPUs,"They used a combination of approaches, EPUs (bare root shoots tied to rebar, anchored by bamboo) and SOD technique where 10-15 shoots and rhizomes (WITH sediment) were secured to ""X"" shaped rebar and placed in mud)",Y,Seagrass that was in shadow of planned bridge construction was transplanted/relocated; so donor bed is same as site bed,1630.5,8052.83959,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Adendum notes that both South and North Sites had increased cover and shoot densities; ""robust and health""",2007,June,Summer,10,12 months,108,1.5,ND,"""shallow""",ND,ND,300,ND,ND,9.5,212,ND,77,NA,"Meeting mitigation ratio, ratio=met",ND,Y,"Initial densities transplanted was calculated by taking both techniques and the range of possible densities (5-8 and 10-15) and dividing it by 4 to get 9.5 AND plots are smaller than 1msq but spaced 1m apart so they have a shoot density, though clumped of 9.5/m2, South Site transplanted area blended into natural meadows which were 1.989 acres in total by 2016; restored plots were indistinguishable from natural meadow by 2014 so we reported the most recent delineated value (0.1224 acres)",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,Native tribe that utilizes teh channel and the watershed have long term water quality data ,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Siuslaw_2007,Siuslaw_SouthSiteMid_2007,Siuslaw_SouthSiteMid_2007_9yr,NA,"Oregon Department of Transportation, SSNERR, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Siuslaw ,South Site-Mid: Hwy 126 Bridge Replacement Site,43.97,-124.09,OR,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Plug",Sod & EPUs,"They used a combination of approaches, EPUs (bare root shoots tied to rebar, anchored by bamboo) and SOD technique where 10-15 shoots and rhizomes (WITH sediment) were secured to ""X"" shaped rebar and placed in mud)",Y,Seagrass that was in shadow of planned bridge construction was transplanted/relocated; so donor bed is same as site bed,1630.5,8052.83959,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Adendum notes that both South and North Sites had increased cover and shoot densities; ""robust and health""",2007,June,Summer,10,12 months,108,1.5,ND,"""mid""",ND,ND,1000,203,503,9.5,228,27.6,99.4,NA,"Meeting mitigation ratio, ratio=met",Y,Y,"Initial densities transplanted was calculated by taking both techniques and the range of possible densities (5-8 and 10-15) and dividing it by 4 to get 9.5 AND plots are smaller than 1msq but spaced 1m apart so they have a shoot density, though clumped of 9.5/m2, South Site transplanted area blended into natural meadows which were 1.989 acres in total by 2016; restored plots were indistinguishable from natural meadow by 2014 so we reported the most recent delineated value (0.1224 acres)",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,Native tribe that utilizes teh channel and the watershed have long term water quality data ,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Siuslaw_2007,Siuslaw_SouthSiteDeep_2007,Siuslaw_SouthSiteDeep_2007_9yr,NA,"Oregon Department of Transportation, SSNERR, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Siuslaw ,South Site-Deep: Hwy 126 Bridge Replacement Site,43.97,-124.09,OR,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Plug",Sod & EPUs,"They used a combination of approaches, EPUs (bare root shoots tied to rebar, anchored by bamboo) and SOD technique where 10-15 shoots and rhizomes (WITH sediment) were secured to ""X"" shaped rebar and placed in mud)",Y,Seagrass that was in shadow of planned bridge construction was transplanted/relocated; so donor bed is same as site bed,1630.5,8052.83959,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Adendum notes that both South and North Sites had increased cover and shoot densities; ""robust and health""",2007,June,Summer,10,12 months,108,1.5,ND,"""deep""",ND,ND,1400,ND,ND,9.5,112,ND,100,NA,"Meeting mitigation ratio, ratio=met",ND,Y,"Initial densities transplanted was calculated by taking both techniques and the range of possible densities (5-8 and 10-15) and dividing it by 4 to get 9.5 AND plots are smaller than 1msq but spaced 1m apart so they have a shoot density, though clumped of 9.5/m2, South Site transplanted area blended into natural meadows which were 1.989 acres in total by 2016; restored plots were indistinguishable from natural meadow by 2014 so we reported the most recent delineated value (0.1224 acres)",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,Native tribe that utilizes teh channel and the watershed have long term water quality data ,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SouthSlough_ValinoIsl,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Mid_TB_Q12_Jul20,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Mid_TB_Q12_Jul20_1mo,NA,"South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Coos Bay,Valino Island Restoration,43.38,-124.3,OR,Z. japonica,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,"Transplanting using Kat Handbook Technique; galvanized garden staples, 2 shoots per staple tranplanted in plot array, typically 0.25m2",Planted 12 plots; will continue adding plots regularly to test effect of transplant timing on success,Y,"Donor bed (Clam Island) is near mouth and stable, SeagrassNet plots which are right next to restoration (some) lost a lot of seagrass and not therefore considered reference/donor",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"SeagrassNet plots died, now comparing to bed near mouth of estuary ",2020,July,Summer,0.5,"Roughly months 1,3,6,9 etc.",1,NA,ND,Mid,ND,ND,289,3,ND,128,116,ND,25,NA,"Plot persistence and asking is shoot density the same or higher than planted density? If so, that is considered success.",NA,Y,"algal % cover=45, collecting RTK data but don't have exact elevations yet, not monitoring Clam Island (donor bed)",ND,Y,Y,Y,Y,ND,Y,Y,Y,ND,"CDMO Database, SWMP data",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SouthSlough_ValinoIsl,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Mid_TB_Q12_Jul20,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Mid_TB_Q12_Jul20_3mo,NA,"South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Coos Bay,Valino Island Restoration,43.38,-124.3,OR,Z. japonica,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,"Transplanting using Kat Handbook Technique; galvanized garden staples, 2 shoots per staple tranplanted in plot array, typically 0.25m3",Planted 12 plots; will continue adding plots regularly to test effect of transplant timing on success,Y,"Donor bed (Clam Island) is near mouth and stable, SeagrassNet plots which are right next to restoration (some) lost a lot of seagrass and not therefore considered reference/donor",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"SeagrassNet plots died, now comparing to bed near mouth of estuary ",2020,July,Summer,0.5,"Roughly months 1,3,6,9 etc.",3,NA,ND,Mid,ND,ND,289,3,ND,128,96,ND,25,NA,"Plot persistence and asking is shoot density the same or higher than planted density? If so, that is considered success.",NA,Y,algal % cover=35,ND,Y,Y,Y,Y,ND,Y,Y,Y,ND,"CDMO Database, SWMP data",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SouthSlough_ValinoIsl,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Mid_TB_Q12_Jul20,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Mid_TB_Q12_Jul20_6mo,NA,"South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Coos Bay,Valino Island Restoration,43.38,-124.3,OR,Z. japonica,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,"Transplanting using Kat Handbook Technique; galvanized garden staples, 2 shoots per staple tranplanted in plot array, typically 0.25m4",Planted 12 plots; will continue adding plots regularly to test effect of transplant timing on success,Y,"Donor bed (Clam Island) is near mouth and stable, SeagrassNet plots which are right next to restoration (some) lost a lot of seagrass and not therefore considered reference/donor",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"SeagrassNet plots died, now comparing to bed near mouth of estuary ",2020,July,Summer,0.5,"Roughly months 1,3,6,9 etc.",6,NA,ND,Mid,ND,ND,289,3,ND,128,60,ND,30,NA,"Plot persistence and asking is shoot density the same or higher than planted density? If so, that is considered success.",NA,Y,algal % cover=0,ND,Y,Y,Y,Y,ND,Y,Y,Y,ND,"CDMO Database, SWMP data",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SouthSlough_ValinoIsl,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Mid_TB_Q25_Jul20,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Mid_TB_Q25_Jul20_1mo,NA,"South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Coos Bay,Valino Island Restoration,43.38,-124.3,OR,Z. japonica,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,"Transplanting using Kat Handbook Technique; galvanized garden staples, 2 shoots per staple tranplanted in plot array, typically 0.25m5",Planted 12 plots; will continue adding plots regularly to test effect of transplant timing on success,Y,"Donor bed (Clam Island) is near mouth and stable, SeagrassNet plots which are right next to restoration (some) lost a lot of seagrass and not therefore considered reference/donor",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"SeagrassNet plots died, now comparing to bed near mouth of estuary ",2020,July,Summer,0.5,"Roughly months 1,3,6,9 etc.",1,NA,ND,Mid,ND,ND,289,3,ND,108,76,ND,10,NA,"Plot persistence and asking is shoot density the same or higher than planted density? If so, that is considered success.",NA,Y,algal % cover=100,ND,Y,Y,Y,Y,ND,Y,Y,Y,ND,"CDMO Database, SWMP data",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SouthSlough_ValinoIsl,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Mid_TB_Q25_Jul20,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Mid_TB_Q25_Jul20_3mo,NA,"South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Coos Bay,Valino Island Restoration,43.38,-124.3,OR,Z. japonica,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,"Transplanting using Kat Handbook Technique; galvanized garden staples, 2 shoots per staple tranplanted in plot array, typically 0.25m6",Planted 12 plots; will continue adding plots regularly to test effect of transplant timing on success,Y,"Donor bed (Clam Island) is near mouth and stable, SeagrassNet plots which are right next to restoration (some) lost a lot of seagrass and not therefore considered reference/donor",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"SeagrassNet plots died, now comparing to bed near mouth of estuary ",2020,July,Summer,0.5,"Roughly months 1,3,6,9 etc.",3,NA,ND,Mid,ND,ND,289,3,ND,108,0,ND,0,NA,"Plot persistence and asking is shoot density the same or higher than planted density? If so, that is considered success.",NA,N,algal % cover=40,ND,Y,Y,Y,Y,ND,Y,Y,Y,ND,"CDMO Database, SWMP data",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SouthSlough_ValinoIsl,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Mid_TB_Q25_Jul20,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Mid_TB_Q25_Jul20_6mo,NA,"South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Coos Bay,Valino Island Restoration,43.38,-124.3,OR,Z. japonica,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,"Transplanting using Kat Handbook Technique; galvanized garden staples, 2 shoots per staple tranplanted in plot array, typically 0.25m7",Planted 12 plots; will continue adding plots regularly to test effect of transplant timing on success,Y,"Donor bed (Clam Island) is near mouth and stable, SeagrassNet plots which are right next to restoration (some) lost a lot of seagrass and not therefore considered reference/donor",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"SeagrassNet plots died, now comparing to bed near mouth of estuary ",2020,July,Summer,0.5,"Roughly months 1,3,6,9 etc.",6,NA,ND,Mid,ND,ND,289,3,ND,108,0,ND,0,NA,"Plot persistence and asking is shoot density the same or higher than planted density? If so, that is considered success.",NA,N,algal % cover=0,ND,Y,Y,Y,Y,ND,Y,Y,Y,ND,"CDMO Database, SWMP data",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SouthSlough_ValinoIsl,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Mid_TB_Q56_Jul20,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Mid_TB_Q56_Jul20_1mo,NA,"South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Coos Bay,Valino Island Restoration,43.38,-124.3,OR,Z. japonica,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,"Transplanting using Kat Handbook Technique; galvanized garden staples, 2 shoots per staple tranplanted in plot array, typically 0.25m8",Planted 12 plots; will continue adding plots regularly to test effect of transplant timing on success,Y,"Donor bed (Clam Island) is near mouth and stable, SeagrassNet plots which are right next to restoration (some) lost a lot of seagrass and not therefore considered reference/donor",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"SeagrassNet plots died, now comparing to bed near mouth of estuary ",2020,July,Summer,0.5,"Roughly months 1,3,6,9 etc.",1,NA,ND,Mid,ND,ND,289,3,ND,64,72,ND,5,NA,"Plot persistence and asking is shoot density the same or higher than planted density? If so, that is considered success.",NA,Y,algal % cover=35,ND,Y,Y,Y,Y,ND,Y,Y,Y,ND,"CDMO Database, SWMP data",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SouthSlough_ValinoIsl,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Mid_TB_Q56_Jul20,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Mid_TB_Q56_Jul20_3mo,NA,"South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Coos Bay,Valino Island Restoration,43.38,-124.3,OR,Z. japonica,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,"Transplanting using Kat Handbook Technique; galvanized garden staples, 2 shoots per staple tranplanted in plot array, typically 0.25m9",Planted 12 plots; will continue adding plots regularly to test effect of transplant timing on success,Y,"Donor bed (Clam Island) is near mouth and stable, SeagrassNet plots which are right next to restoration (some) lost a lot of seagrass and not therefore considered reference/donor",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"SeagrassNet plots died, now comparing to bed near mouth of estuary ",2020,July,Summer,0.5,"Roughly months 1,3,6,9 etc.",3,NA,ND,Mid,ND,ND,289,3,ND,64,24,ND,5,NA,"Plot persistence and asking is shoot density the same or higher than planted density? If so, that is considered success.",NA,Y,algal % cover=15,ND,Y,Y,Y,Y,ND,Y,Y,Y,ND,"CDMO Database, SWMP data",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SouthSlough_ValinoIsl,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Mid_TB_Q56_Jul20,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Mid_TB_Q56_Jul20_6mo,NA,"South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Coos Bay,Valino Island Restoration,43.38,-124.3,OR,Z. japonica,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,"Transplanting using Kat Handbook Technique; galvanized garden staples, 2 shoots per staple tranplanted in plot array, typically 0.25m10",Planted 12 plots; will continue adding plots regularly to test effect of transplant timing on success,Y,"Donor bed (Clam Island) is near mouth and stable, SeagrassNet plots which are right next to restoration (some) lost a lot of seagrass and not therefore considered reference/donor",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"SeagrassNet plots died, now comparing to bed near mouth of estuary ",2020,July,Summer,0.5,"Roughly months 1,3,6,9 etc.",6,NA,ND,Mid,ND,ND,289,3,ND,64,32,ND,5,NA,"Plot persistence and asking is shoot density the same or higher than planted density? If so, that is considered success.",NA,Y,algal % cover=1,ND,Y,Y,Y,Y,ND,Y,Y,Y,ND,"CDMO Database, SWMP data",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SouthSlough_ValinoIsl,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Mid_TB_Q86_Jul20,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Mid_TB_Q86_Jul20_1mo,NA,"South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Coos Bay,Valino Island Restoration,43.38,-124.3,OR,Z. japonica,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,"Transplanting using Kat Handbook Technique; galvanized garden staples, 2 shoots per staple tranplanted in plot array, typically 0.25m11",Planted 12 plots; will continue adding plots regularly to test effect of transplant timing on success,Y,"Donor bed (Clam Island) is near mouth and stable, SeagrassNet plots which are right next to restoration (some) lost a lot of seagrass and not therefore considered reference/donor",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"SeagrassNet plots died, now comparing to bed near mouth of estuary ",2020,July,Summer,0.5,"Roughly months 1,3,6,9 etc.",1,NA,ND,Mid,ND,ND,289,3,ND,88,28,ND,5,NA,"Plot persistence and asking is shoot density the same or higher than planted density? If so, that is considered success.",NA,Y,algal % cover=5,ND,Y,Y,Y,Y,ND,Y,Y,Y,ND,"CDMO Database, SWMP data",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SouthSlough_ValinoIsl,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Mid_TB_Q86_Jul20,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Mid_TB_Q86_Jul20_3mo,NA,"South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Coos Bay,Valino Island Restoration,43.38,-124.3,OR,Z. japonica,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,"Transplanting using Kat Handbook Technique; galvanized garden staples, 2 shoots per staple tranplanted in plot array, typically 0.25m12",Planted 12 plots; will continue adding plots regularly to test effect of transplant timing on success,Y,"Donor bed (Clam Island) is near mouth and stable, SeagrassNet plots which are right next to restoration (some) lost a lot of seagrass and not therefore considered reference/donor",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"SeagrassNet plots died, now comparing to bed near mouth of estuary ",2020,July,Summer,0.5,"Roughly months 1,3,6,9 etc.",3,NA,ND,Mid,ND,ND,289,3,ND,88,0,ND,0,NA,"Plot persistence and asking is shoot density the same or higher than planted density? If so, that is considered success.",NA,N,algal % cover=0,ND,Y,Y,Y,Y,ND,Y,Y,Y,ND,"CDMO Database, SWMP data",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SouthSlough_ValinoIsl,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Mid_TB_Q86_Jul20,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Mid_TB_Q86_Jul20_6mo,NA,"South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Coos Bay,Valino Island Restoration,43.38,-124.3,OR,Z. japonica,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,"Transplanting using Kat Handbook Technique; galvanized garden staples, 2 shoots per staple tranplanted in plot array, typically 0.25m13",Planted 12 plots; will continue adding plots regularly to test effect of transplant timing on success,Y,"Donor bed (Clam Island) is near mouth and stable, SeagrassNet plots which are right next to restoration (some) lost a lot of seagrass and not therefore considered reference/donor",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"SeagrassNet plots died, now comparing to bed near mouth of estuary ",2020,July,Summer,0.5,"Roughly months 1,3,6,9 etc.",6,NA,ND,Mid,ND,ND,289,3,ND,88,0,ND,0,NA,"Plot persistence and asking is shoot density the same or higher than planted density? If so, that is considered success.",NA,N,algal % cover=1,ND,Y,Y,Y,Y,ND,Y,Y,Y,ND,"CDMO Database, SWMP data",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SouthSlough_ValinoIsl,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Low_TC_Q12_Jul20,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Low_TC_Q12_Jul20_1mo,NA,"South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Coos Bay,Valino Island Restoration,43.38,-124.3,OR,Z. japonica,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,"Transplanting using Kat Handbook Technique; galvanized garden staples, 2 shoots per staple tranplanted in plot array, typically 0.25m14",Planted 12 plots; will continue adding plots regularly to test effect of transplant timing on success,Y,"Donor bed (Clam Island) is near mouth and stable, SeagrassNet plots which are right next to restoration (some) lost a lot of seagrass and not therefore considered reference/donor",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"SeagrassNet plots died, now comparing to bed near mouth of estuary ",2020,July,Summer,0.5,"Roughly months 1,3,6,9 etc.",1,NA,ND,Low,ND,ND,289,3,ND,168,164,ND,50,NA,"Plot persistence and asking is shoot density the same or higher than planted density? If so, that is considered success.",NA,Y,algal % cover=30,ND,Y,Y,Y,Y,ND,Y,Y,Y,ND,"CDMO Database, SWMP data",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SouthSlough_ValinoIsl,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Low_TC_Q12_Jul20,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Low_TC_Q12_Jul20_3mo,NA,"South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Coos Bay,Valino Island Restoration,43.38,-124.3,OR,Z. japonica,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,"Transplanting using Kat Handbook Technique; galvanized garden staples, 2 shoots per staple tranplanted in plot array, typically 0.25m15",Planted 12 plots; will continue adding plots regularly to test effect of transplant timing on success,Y,"Donor bed (Clam Island) is near mouth and stable, SeagrassNet plots which are right next to restoration (some) lost a lot of seagrass and not therefore considered reference/donor",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"SeagrassNet plots died, now comparing to bed near mouth of estuary ",2020,July,Summer,0.5,"Roughly months 1,3,6,9 etc.",3,NA,ND,Low,ND,ND,289,3,ND,168,184,ND,70,NA,"Plot persistence and asking is shoot density the same or higher than planted density? If so, that is considered success.",NA,Y,algal % cover=15,ND,Y,Y,Y,Y,ND,Y,Y,Y,ND,"CDMO Database, SWMP data",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SouthSlough_ValinoIsl,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Low_TC_Q12_Jul20,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Low_TC_Q12_Jul20_6mo,NA,"South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Coos Bay,Valino Island Restoration,43.38,-124.3,OR,Z. japonica,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,"Transplanting using Kat Handbook Technique; galvanized garden staples, 2 shoots per staple tranplanted in plot array, typically 0.25m16",Planted 12 plots; will continue adding plots regularly to test effect of transplant timing on success,Y,"Donor bed (Clam Island) is near mouth and stable, SeagrassNet plots which are right next to restoration (some) lost a lot of seagrass and not therefore considered reference/donor",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"SeagrassNet plots died, now comparing to bed near mouth of estuary ",2020,July,Summer,0.5,"Roughly months 1,3,6,9 etc.",6,NA,ND,Low,ND,ND,289,3,ND,168,112,ND,60,NA,"Plot persistence and asking is shoot density the same or higher than planted density? If so, that is considered success.",NA,Y,algal % cover=20,ND,Y,Y,Y,Y,ND,Y,Y,Y,ND,"CDMO Database, SWMP data",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SouthSlough_ValinoIsl,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Low_TC_Q23_Jul20,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Low_TC_Q23_Jul20_1mo,NA,"South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Coos Bay,Valino Island Restoration,43.38,-124.3,OR,Z. japonica,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,"Transplanting using Kat Handbook Technique; galvanized garden staples, 2 shoots per staple tranplanted in plot array, typically 0.25m17",Planted 12 plots; will continue adding plots regularly to test effect of transplant timing on success,Y,"Donor bed (Clam Island) is near mouth and stable, SeagrassNet plots which are right next to restoration (some) lost a lot of seagrass and not therefore considered reference/donor",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"SeagrassNet plots died, now comparing to bed near mouth of estuary ",2020,July,Summer,0.5,"Roughly months 1,3,6,9 etc.",1,NA,ND,Low,ND,ND,289,3,ND,44,16,ND,1,NA,"Plot persistence and asking is shoot density the same or higher than planted density? If so, that is considered success.",NA,Y,algal % cover=90,ND,Y,Y,Y,Y,ND,Y,Y,Y,ND,"CDMO Database, SWMP data",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SouthSlough_ValinoIsl,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Low_TC_Q23_Jul20,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Low_TC_Q23_Jul20_3mo,NA,"South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Coos Bay,Valino Island Restoration,43.38,-124.3,OR,Z. japonica,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,"Transplanting using Kat Handbook Technique; galvanized garden staples, 2 shoots per staple tranplanted in plot array, typically 0.25m18",Planted 12 plots; will continue adding plots regularly to test effect of transplant timing on success,Y,"Donor bed (Clam Island) is near mouth and stable, SeagrassNet plots which are right next to restoration (some) lost a lot of seagrass and not therefore considered reference/donor",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"SeagrassNet plots died, now comparing to bed near mouth of estuary ",2020,July,Summer,0.5,"Roughly months 1,3,6,9 etc.",3,NA,ND,Low,ND,ND,289,3,ND,44,72,ND,35,NA,"Plot persistence and asking is shoot density the same or higher than planted density? If so, that is considered success.",NA,Y,algal % cover=25,ND,Y,Y,Y,Y,ND,Y,Y,Y,ND,"CDMO Database, SWMP data",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SouthSlough_ValinoIsl,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Low_TC_Q23_Jul20,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Low_TC_Q23_Jul20_6mo,NA,"South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Coos Bay,Valino Island Restoration,43.38,-124.3,OR,Z. japonica,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,"Transplanting using Kat Handbook Technique; galvanized garden staples, 2 shoots per staple tranplanted in plot array, typically 0.25m19",Planted 12 plots; will continue adding plots regularly to test effect of transplant timing on success,Y,"Donor bed (Clam Island) is near mouth and stable, SeagrassNet plots which are right next to restoration (some) lost a lot of seagrass and not therefore considered reference/donor",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"SeagrassNet plots died, now comparing to bed near mouth of estuary ",2020,July,Summer,0.5,"Roughly months 1,3,6,9 etc.",6,NA,ND,Low,ND,ND,289,3,ND,44,104,ND,40,NA,"Plot persistence and asking is shoot density the same or higher than planted density? If so, that is considered success.",NA,Y,algal % cover=15,ND,Y,Y,Y,Y,ND,Y,Y,Y,ND,"CDMO Database, SWMP data",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SouthSlough_ValinoIsl,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Low_TC_Q56_Jul20,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Low_TC_Q56_Jul20_1mo,NA,"South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Coos Bay,Valino Island Restoration,43.38,-124.3,OR,Z. japonica,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,"Transplanting using Kat Handbook Technique; galvanized garden staples, 2 shoots per staple tranplanted in plot array, typically 0.25m20",Planted 12 plots; will continue adding plots regularly to test effect of transplant timing on success,Y,"Donor bed (Clam Island) is near mouth and stable, SeagrassNet plots which are right next to restoration (some) lost a lot of seagrass and not therefore considered reference/donor",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"SeagrassNet plots died, now comparing to bed near mouth of estuary ",2020,July,Summer,0.5,"Roughly months 1,3,6,9 etc.",1,NA,ND,Low,ND,ND,289,3,ND,80,32,ND,5,NA,"Plot persistence and asking is shoot density the same or higher than planted density? If so, that is considered success.",NA,Y,algal % cover=25,ND,Y,Y,Y,Y,ND,Y,Y,Y,ND,"CDMO Database, SWMP data",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SouthSlough_ValinoIsl,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Low_TC_Q56_Jul20,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Low_TC_Q56_Jul20_3mo,NA,"South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Coos Bay,Valino Island Restoration,43.38,-124.3,OR,Z. japonica,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,"Transplanting using Kat Handbook Technique; galvanized garden staples, 2 shoots per staple tranplanted in plot array, typically 0.25m21",Planted 12 plots; will continue adding plots regularly to test effect of transplant timing on success,Y,"Donor bed (Clam Island) is near mouth and stable, SeagrassNet plots which are right next to restoration (some) lost a lot of seagrass and not therefore considered reference/donor",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"SeagrassNet plots died, now comparing to bed near mouth of estuary ",2020,July,Summer,0.5,"Roughly months 1,3,6,9 etc.",3,NA,ND,Low,ND,ND,289,3,ND,80,20,ND,5,NA,"Plot persistence and asking is shoot density the same or higher than planted density? If so, that is considered success.",NA,Y,algal % cover=5,ND,Y,Y,Y,Y,ND,Y,Y,Y,ND,"CDMO Database, SWMP data",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SouthSlough_ValinoIsl,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Low_TC_Q56_Jul20,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Low_TC_Q56_Jul20_6mo,NA,"South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Coos Bay,Valino Island Restoration,43.38,-124.3,OR,Z. japonica,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,"Transplanting using Kat Handbook Technique; galvanized garden staples, 2 shoots per staple tranplanted in plot array, typically 0.25m22",Planted 12 plots; will continue adding plots regularly to test effect of transplant timing on success,Y,"Donor bed (Clam Island) is near mouth and stable, SeagrassNet plots which are right next to restoration (some) lost a lot of seagrass and not therefore considered reference/donor",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"SeagrassNet plots died, now comparing to bed near mouth of estuary ",2020,July,Summer,0.5,"Roughly months 1,3,6,9 etc.",6,NA,ND,Low,ND,ND,289,3,ND,80,48,ND,25,NA,"Plot persistence and asking is shoot density the same or higher than planted density? If so, that is considered success.",NA,Y,algal % cover=1,ND,Y,Y,Y,Y,ND,Y,Y,Y,ND,"CDMO Database, SWMP data",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SouthSlough_ValinoIsl,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Low_TC_Q87_Jul20,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Low_TC_Q87_Jul20_1mo,NA,"South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Coos Bay,Valino Island Restoration,43.38,-124.3,OR,Z. japonica,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,"Transplanting using Kat Handbook Technique; galvanized garden staples, 2 shoots per staple tranplanted in plot array, typically 0.25m23",Planted 12 plots; will continue adding plots regularly to test effect of transplant timing on success,Y,"Donor bed (Clam Island) is near mouth and stable, SeagrassNet plots which are right next to restoration (some) lost a lot of seagrass and not therefore considered reference/donor",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"SeagrassNet plots died, now comparing to bed near mouth of estuary ",2020,July,Summer,0.5,"Roughly months 1,3,6,9 etc.",1,NA,ND,Low,ND,ND,289,3,ND,88,80,ND,30,NA,"Plot persistence and asking is shoot density the same or higher than planted density? If so, that is considered success.",NA,Y,algal % cover=15,ND,Y,Y,Y,Y,ND,Y,Y,Y,ND,"CDMO Database, SWMP data",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SouthSlough_ValinoIsl,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Low_TC_Q87_Jul20,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Low_TC_Q87_Jul20_3mo,NA,"South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Coos Bay,Valino Island Restoration,43.38,-124.3,OR,Z. japonica,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,"Transplanting using Kat Handbook Technique; galvanized garden staples, 2 shoots per staple tranplanted in plot array, typically 0.25m24",Planted 12 plots; will continue adding plots regularly to test effect of transplant timing on success,Y,"Donor bed (Clam Island) is near mouth and stable, SeagrassNet plots which are right next to restoration (some) lost a lot of seagrass and not therefore considered reference/donor",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"SeagrassNet plots died, now comparing to bed near mouth of estuary ",2020,July,Summer,0.5,"Roughly months 1,3,6,9 etc.",3,NA,ND,Low,ND,ND,289,3,ND,88,88,ND,55,NA,"Plot persistence and asking is shoot density the same or higher than planted density? If so, that is considered success.",NA,Y,algal % cover=10,ND,Y,Y,Y,Y,ND,Y,Y,Y,ND,"CDMO Database, SWMP data",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SouthSlough_ValinoIsl,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Low_TC_Q87_Jul20,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Low_TC_Q87_Jul20_6mo,NA,"South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Coos Bay,Valino Island Restoration,43.38,-124.3,OR,Z. japonica,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,"Transplanting using Kat Handbook Technique; galvanized garden staples, 2 shoots per staple tranplanted in plot array, typically 0.25m25",Planted 12 plots; will continue adding plots regularly to test effect of transplant timing on success,Y,"Donor bed (Clam Island) is near mouth and stable, SeagrassNet plots which are right next to restoration (some) lost a lot of seagrass and not therefore considered reference/donor",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"SeagrassNet plots died, now comparing to bed near mouth of estuary ",2020,July,Summer,0.5,"Roughly months 1,3,6,9 etc.",6,NA,ND,Low,ND,ND,289,3,ND,88,164,ND,60,NA,"Plot persistence and asking is shoot density the same or higher than planted density? If so, that is considered success.",NA,Y,algal % cover=5,ND,Y,Y,Y,Y,ND,Y,Y,Y,ND,"CDMO Database, SWMP data",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SouthSlough_ValinoIsl,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Intertidal_Subtidal Edge_TS_Q12_Jul20,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Intertidal_Subtidal Edge_TS_Q12_Jul20_1mo,NA,"South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Coos Bay,Valino Island Restoration,43.38,-124.3,OR,Z. japonica,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,"Transplanting using Kat Handbook Technique; galvanized garden staples, 2 shoots per staple tranplanted in plot array, typically 0.25m26",Planted 12 plots; will continue adding plots regularly to test effect of transplant timing on success,Y,"Donor bed (Clam Island) is near mouth and stable, SeagrassNet plots which are right next to restoration (some) lost a lot of seagrass and not therefore considered reference/donor",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"SeagrassNet plots died, now comparing to bed near mouth of estuary ",2020,July,Summer,0.5,"Roughly months 1,3,6,9 etc.",1,NA,ND,Intertidal Subtidal Edge,ND,ND,289,3,ND,136,128,ND,50,NA,"Plot persistence and asking is shoot density the same or higher than planted density? If so, that is considered success.",NA,Y,algal % cover=10,ND,Y,Y,Y,Y,ND,Y,Y,Y,ND,"CDMO Database, SWMP data",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SouthSlough_ValinoIsl,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Intertidal_Subtidal Edge_TS_Q12_Jul20,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Intertidal_Subtidal Edge_TS_Q12_Jul20_3mo,NA,"South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Coos Bay,Valino Island Restoration,43.38,-124.3,OR,Z. japonica,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,"Transplanting using Kat Handbook Technique; galvanized garden staples, 2 shoots per staple tranplanted in plot array, typically 0.25m27",Planted 12 plots; will continue adding plots regularly to test effect of transplant timing on success,Y,"Donor bed (Clam Island) is near mouth and stable, SeagrassNet plots which are right next to restoration (some) lost a lot of seagrass and not therefore considered reference/donor",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"SeagrassNet plots died, now comparing to bed near mouth of estuary ",2020,July,Summer,0.5,"Roughly months 1,3,6,9 etc.",3,NA,ND,Intertidal Subtidal Edge,ND,ND,289,3,ND,136,160,ND,85,NA,"Plot persistence and asking is shoot density the same or higher than planted density? If so, that is considered success.",NA,Y,algal % cover=60,ND,Y,Y,Y,Y,ND,Y,Y,Y,ND,"CDMO Database, SWMP data",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SouthSlough_ValinoIsl,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Intertidal_Subtidal Edge_TS_Q12_Jul20,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Intertidal_Subtidal Edge_TS_Q12_Jul20_6mo,NA,"South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Coos Bay,Valino Island Restoration,43.38,-124.3,OR,Z. japonica,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,"Transplanting using Kat Handbook Technique; galvanized garden staples, 2 shoots per staple tranplanted in plot array, typically 0.25m28",Planted 12 plots; will continue adding plots regularly to test effect of transplant timing on success,Y,"Donor bed (Clam Island) is near mouth and stable, SeagrassNet plots which are right next to restoration (some) lost a lot of seagrass and not therefore considered reference/donor",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"SeagrassNet plots died, now comparing to bed near mouth of estuary ",2020,July,Summer,0.5,"Roughly months 1,3,6,9 etc.",6,NA,ND,Intertidal Subtidal Edge,ND,ND,289,3,ND,136,200,ND,50,NA,"Plot persistence and asking is shoot density the same or higher than planted density? If so, that is considered success.",NA,Y,algal % cover=20,ND,Y,Y,Y,Y,ND,Y,Y,Y,ND,"CDMO Database, SWMP data",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SouthSlough_ValinoIsl,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Intertidal_Subtidal Edge_TS_Q26_Jul20,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Intertidal_Subtidal Edge_TS_Q26_Jul20_1mo,NA,"South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Coos Bay,Valino Island Restoration,43.38,-124.3,OR,Z. japonica,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,"Transplanting using Kat Handbook Technique; galvanized garden staples, 2 shoots per staple tranplanted in plot array, typically 0.25m29",Planted 12 plots; will continue adding plots regularly to test effect of transplant timing on success,Y,"Donor bed (Clam Island) is near mouth and stable, SeagrassNet plots which are right next to restoration (some) lost a lot of seagrass and not therefore considered reference/donor",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"SeagrassNet plots died, now comparing to bed near mouth of estuary ",2020,July,Summer,0.5,"Roughly months 1,3,6,9 etc.",1,NA,ND,Intertidal Subtidal Edge,ND,ND,289,3,ND,76,32,ND,10,NA,"Plot persistence and asking is shoot density the same or higher than planted density? If so, that is considered success.",NA,Y,algal % cover=75,ND,Y,Y,Y,Y,ND,Y,Y,Y,ND,"CDMO Database, SWMP data",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SouthSlough_ValinoIsl,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Intertidal_Subtidal Edge_TS_Q26_Jul20,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Intertidal_Subtidal Edge_TS_Q26_Jul20_3mo,NA,"South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Coos Bay,Valino Island Restoration,43.38,-124.3,OR,Z. japonica,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,"Transplanting using Kat Handbook Technique; galvanized garden staples, 2 shoots per staple tranplanted in plot array, typically 0.25m30",Planted 12 plots; will continue adding plots regularly to test effect of transplant timing on success,Y,"Donor bed (Clam Island) is near mouth and stable, SeagrassNet plots which are right next to restoration (some) lost a lot of seagrass and not therefore considered reference/donor",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"SeagrassNet plots died, now comparing to bed near mouth of estuary ",2020,July,Summer,0.5,"Roughly months 1,3,6,9 etc.",3,NA,ND,Intertidal Subtidal Edge,ND,ND,289,3,ND,76,64,ND,35,NA,"Plot persistence and asking is shoot density the same or higher than planted density? If so, that is considered success.",NA,Y,algal % cover=20,ND,Y,Y,Y,Y,ND,Y,Y,Y,ND,"CDMO Database, SWMP data",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SouthSlough_ValinoIsl,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Intertidal_Subtidal Edge_TS_Q26_Jul20,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Intertidal_Subtidal Edge_TS_Q26_Jul20_6mo,NA,"South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Coos Bay,Valino Island Restoration,43.38,-124.3,OR,Z. japonica,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,"Transplanting using Kat Handbook Technique; galvanized garden staples, 2 shoots per staple tranplanted in plot array, typically 0.25m31",Planted 12 plots; will continue adding plots regularly to test effect of transplant timing on success,Y,"Donor bed (Clam Island) is near mouth and stable, SeagrassNet plots which are right next to restoration (some) lost a lot of seagrass and not therefore considered reference/donor",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"SeagrassNet plots died, now comparing to bed near mouth of estuary ",2020,July,Summer,0.5,"Roughly months 1,3,6,9 etc.",6,NA,ND,Intertidal Subtidal Edge,ND,ND,289,3,ND,76,200,ND,70,NA,"Plot persistence and asking is shoot density the same or higher than planted density? If so, that is considered success.",NA,Y,algal % cover=10,ND,Y,Y,Y,Y,ND,Y,Y,Y,ND,"CDMO Database, SWMP data",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SouthSlough_ValinoIsl,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Intertidal_Subtidal Edge_TS_Q56_Jul20,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Intertidal_Subtidal Edge_TS_Q56_Jul20_1mo,NA,"South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Coos Bay,Valino Island Restoration,43.38,-124.3,OR,Z. japonica,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,"Transplanting using Kat Handbook Technique; galvanized garden staples, 2 shoots per staple tranplanted in plot array, typically 0.25m32",Planted 12 plots; will continue adding plots regularly to test effect of transplant timing on success,Y,"Donor bed (Clam Island) is near mouth and stable, SeagrassNet plots which are right next to restoration (some) lost a lot of seagrass and not therefore considered reference/donor",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"SeagrassNet plots died, now comparing to bed near mouth of estuary ",2020,July,Summer,0.5,"Roughly months 1,3,6,9 etc.",1,NA,ND,Intertidal Subtidal Edge,ND,ND,289,3,ND,52,40,ND,50,NA,"Plot persistence and asking is shoot density the same or higher than planted density? If so, that is considered success.",NA,Y,algal % cover=50,ND,Y,Y,Y,Y,ND,Y,Y,Y,ND,"CDMO Database, SWMP data",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SouthSlough_ValinoIsl,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Intertidal_Subtidal Edge_TS_Q56_Jul20,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Intertidal_Subtidal Edge_TS_Q56_Jul20_3mo,NA,"South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Coos Bay,Valino Island Restoration,43.38,-124.3,OR,Z. japonica,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,"Transplanting using Kat Handbook Technique; galvanized garden staples, 2 shoots per staple tranplanted in plot array, typically 0.25m33",Planted 12 plots; will continue adding plots regularly to test effect of transplant timing on success,Y,"Donor bed (Clam Island) is near mouth and stable, SeagrassNet plots which are right next to restoration (some) lost a lot of seagrass and not therefore considered reference/donor",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"SeagrassNet plots died, now comparing to bed near mouth of estuary ",2020,July,Summer,0.5,"Roughly months 1,3,6,9 etc.",3,NA,ND,Intertidal Subtidal Edge,ND,ND,289,3,ND,52,68,ND,45,NA,"Plot persistence and asking is shoot density the same or higher than planted density? If so, that is considered success.",NA,Y,algal % cover=15,ND,Y,Y,Y,Y,ND,Y,Y,Y,ND,"CDMO Database, SWMP data",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SouthSlough_ValinoIsl,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Intertidal_Subtidal Edge_TS_Q56_Jul20,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Intertidal_Subtidal Edge_TS_Q56_Jul20_6mo,NA,"South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Coos Bay,Valino Island Restoration,43.38,-124.3,OR,Z. japonica,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,"Transplanting using Kat Handbook Technique; galvanized garden staples, 2 shoots per staple tranplanted in plot array, typically 0.25m34",Planted 12 plots; will continue adding plots regularly to test effect of transplant timing on success,Y,"Donor bed (Clam Island) is near mouth and stable, SeagrassNet plots which are right next to restoration (some) lost a lot of seagrass and not therefore considered reference/donor",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"SeagrassNet plots died, now comparing to bed near mouth of estuary ",2020,July,Summer,0.5,"Roughly months 1,3,6,9 etc.",6,NA,ND,Intertidal Subtidal Edge,ND,ND,289,3,ND,52,80,ND,30,NA,"Plot persistence and asking is shoot density the same or higher than planted density? If so, that is considered success.",NA,Y,algal % cover=1,ND,Y,Y,Y,Y,ND,Y,Y,Y,ND,"CDMO Database, SWMP data",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SouthSlough_ValinoIsl,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Intertidal_Subtidal Edge_TS_Q88_Jul20,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Intertidal_Subtidal Edge_TS_Q88_Jul20_1mo,NA,"South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Coos Bay,Valino Island Restoration,43.38,-124.3,OR,Z. japonica,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,"Transplanting using Kat Handbook Technique; galvanized garden staples, 2 shoots per staple tranplanted in plot array, typically 0.25m35",Planted 12 plots; will continue adding plots regularly to test effect of transplant timing on success,Y,"Donor bed (Clam Island) is near mouth and stable, SeagrassNet plots which are right next to restoration (some) lost a lot of seagrass and not therefore considered reference/donor",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"SeagrassNet plots died, now comparing to bed near mouth of estuary ",2020,July,Summer,0.5,"Roughly months 1,3,6,9 etc.",1,NA,ND,Intertidal Subtidal Edge,ND,ND,289,3,ND,124,112,ND,50,NA,"Plot persistence and asking is shoot density the same or higher than planted density? If so, that is considered success.",NA,Y,algal % cover=20,ND,Y,Y,Y,Y,ND,Y,Y,Y,ND,"CDMO Database, SWMP data",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SouthSlough_ValinoIsl,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Intertidal_Subtidal Edge_TS_Q88_Jul20,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Intertidal_Subtidal Edge_TS_Q88_Jul20_3mo,NA,"South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Coos Bay,Valino Island Restoration,43.38,-124.3,OR,Z. japonica,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,"Transplanting using Kat Handbook Technique; galvanized garden staples, 2 shoots per staple tranplanted in plot array, typically 0.25m36",Planted 12 plots; will continue adding plots regularly to test effect of transplant timing on success,Y,"Donor bed (Clam Island) is near mouth and stable, SeagrassNet plots which are right next to restoration (some) lost a lot of seagrass and not therefore considered reference/donor",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"SeagrassNet plots died, now comparing to bed near mouth of estuary ",2020,July,Summer,0.5,"Roughly months 1,3,6,9 etc.",3,NA,ND,Intertidal Subtidal Edge,ND,ND,289,3,ND,124,44,ND,20,NA,"Plot persistence and asking is shoot density the same or higher than planted density? If so, that is considered success.",NA,Y,algal % cover=5,ND,Y,Y,Y,Y,ND,Y,Y,Y,ND,"CDMO Database, SWMP data",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SouthSlough_ValinoIsl,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Intertidal_Subtidal Edge_TS_Q88_Jul20,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Intertidal_Subtidal Edge_TS_Q88_Jul20_6mo,NA,"South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Coos Bay,Valino Island Restoration,43.38,-124.3,OR,Z. japonica,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,"Transplanting using Kat Handbook Technique; galvanized garden staples, 2 shoots per staple tranplanted in plot array, typically 0.25m37",Planted 12 plots; will continue adding plots regularly to test effect of transplant timing on success,Y,"Donor bed (Clam Island) is near mouth and stable, SeagrassNet plots which are right next to restoration (some) lost a lot of seagrass and not therefore considered reference/donor",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"SeagrassNet plots died, now comparing to bed near mouth of estuary ",2020,July,Summer,0.5,"Roughly months 1,3,6,9 etc.",6,NA,ND,Intertidal Subtidal Edge,ND,ND,289,3,ND,124,136,ND,35,NA,"Plot persistence and asking is shoot density the same or higher than planted density? If so, that is considered success.",NA,Y,algal % cover=5,ND,Y,Y,Y,Y,ND,Y,Y,Y,ND,"CDMO Database, SWMP data",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SouthSlough_ValinoIsl,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Mid_TB_Q20_Sep20,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Mid_TB_Q20_Sep20_1mo,NA,"South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Coos Bay,Valino Island Restoration,43.38,-124.3,OR,Z. japonica,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,"Transplanting using Kat Handbook Technique; galvanized garden staples, 2 shoots per staple tranplanted in plot array, typically 0.25m38",Planted 12 plots; will continue adding plots regularly to test effect of transplant timing on success,Y,"Donor bed (Clam Island) is near mouth and stable, SeagrassNet plots which are right next to restoration (some) lost a lot of seagrass and not therefore considered reference/donor",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"SeagrassNet plots died, now comparing to bed near mouth of estuary ",2020,September,Fall,0.33,"Roughly months 1,3,6,9 etc.",1,NA,ND,Mid,ND,ND,188,1.5,ND,136,148,ND,50,NA,"Plot persistence and asking is shoot density the same or higher than planted density? If so, that is considered success.",NA,Y,algal % cover=35,ND,Y,Y,Y,Y,ND,Y,Y,Y,ND,"CDMO Database, SWMP data",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SouthSlough_ValinoIsl,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Mid_TB_Q20_Sep20,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Mid_TB_Q20_Sep20_4mo,NA,"South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Coos Bay,Valino Island Restoration,43.38,-124.3,OR,Z. japonica,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,"Transplanting using Kat Handbook Technique; galvanized garden staples, 2 shoots per staple tranplanted in plot array, typically 0.25m39",Planted 12 plots; will continue adding plots regularly to test effect of transplant timing on success,Y,"Donor bed (Clam Island) is near mouth and stable, SeagrassNet plots which are right next to restoration (some) lost a lot of seagrass and not therefore considered reference/donor",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"SeagrassNet plots died, now comparing to bed near mouth of estuary ",2020,September,Fall,0.33,"Roughly months 1,3,6,9 etc.",4,NA,ND,Mid,ND,ND,188,1.5,ND,136,176,ND,75,NA,"Plot persistence and asking is shoot density the same or higher than planted density? If so, that is considered success.",NA,Y,algal % cover=15,ND,Y,Y,Y,Y,ND,Y,Y,Y,ND,"CDMO Database, SWMP data",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SouthSlough_ValinoIsl,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Mid_TB_Q40_Sep20,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Mid_TB_Q40_Sep20_1mo,NA,"South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Coos Bay,Valino Island Restoration,43.38,-124.3,OR,Z. japonica,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,"Transplanting using Kat Handbook Technique; galvanized garden staples, 2 shoots per staple tranplanted in plot array, typically 0.25m40",Planted 12 plots; will continue adding plots regularly to test effect of transplant timing on success,Y,"Donor bed (Clam Island) is near mouth and stable, SeagrassNet plots which are right next to restoration (some) lost a lot of seagrass and not therefore considered reference/donor",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"SeagrassNet plots died, now comparing to bed near mouth of estuary ",2020,September,Fall,0.33,"Roughly months 1,3,6,9 etc.",1,NA,ND,Mid,ND,ND,188,1.5,ND,124,16,ND,5,NA,"Plot persistence and asking is shoot density the same or higher than planted density? If so, that is considered success.",NA,Y,algal % cover=40,ND,Y,Y,Y,Y,ND,Y,Y,Y,ND,"CDMO Database, SWMP data",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SouthSlough_ValinoIsl,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Mid_TB_Q40_Sep20,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Mid_TB_Q40_Sep20_4mo,NA,"South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Coos Bay,Valino Island Restoration,43.38,-124.3,OR,Z. japonica,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,"Transplanting using Kat Handbook Technique; galvanized garden staples, 2 shoots per staple tranplanted in plot array, typically 0.25m41",Planted 12 plots; will continue adding plots regularly to test effect of transplant timing on success,Y,"Donor bed (Clam Island) is near mouth and stable, SeagrassNet plots which are right next to restoration (some) lost a lot of seagrass and not therefore considered reference/donor",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"SeagrassNet plots died, now comparing to bed near mouth of estuary ",2020,September,Fall,0.33,"Roughly months 1,3,6,9 etc.",4,NA,ND,Mid,ND,ND,188,1.5,ND,124,20,ND,5,NA,"Plot persistence and asking is shoot density the same or higher than planted density? If so, that is considered success.",NA,Y,algal % cover=1,ND,Y,Y,Y,Y,ND,Y,Y,Y,ND,"CDMO Database, SWMP data",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SouthSlough_ValinoIsl,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Mid_TB_Q69_Sep20,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Mid_TB_Q69_Sep20_1mo,NA,"South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Coos Bay,Valino Island Restoration,43.38,-124.3,OR,Z. japonica,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,"Transplanting using Kat Handbook Technique; galvanized garden staples, 2 shoots per staple tranplanted in plot array, typically 0.25m42",Planted 12 plots; will continue adding plots regularly to test effect of transplant timing on success,Y,"Donor bed (Clam Island) is near mouth and stable, SeagrassNet plots which are right next to restoration (some) lost a lot of seagrass and not therefore considered reference/donor",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"SeagrassNet plots died, now comparing to bed near mouth of estuary ",2020,September,Fall,0.33,"Roughly months 1,3,6,9 etc.",1,NA,ND,Mid,ND,ND,188,1.5,ND,112,104,ND,40,NA,"Plot persistence and asking is shoot density the same or higher than planted density? If so, that is considered success.",NA,Y,algal % cover=15,ND,Y,Y,Y,Y,ND,Y,Y,Y,ND,"CDMO Database, SWMP data",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SouthSlough_ValinoIsl,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Mid_TB_Q69_Sep20,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Mid_TB_Q69_Sep20_4mo,NA,"South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Coos Bay,Valino Island Restoration,43.38,-124.3,OR,Z. japonica,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,"Transplanting using Kat Handbook Technique; galvanized garden staples, 2 shoots per staple tranplanted in plot array, typically 0.25m43",Planted 12 plots; will continue adding plots regularly to test effect of transplant timing on success,Y,"Donor bed (Clam Island) is near mouth and stable, SeagrassNet plots which are right next to restoration (some) lost a lot of seagrass and not therefore considered reference/donor",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"SeagrassNet plots died, now comparing to bed near mouth of estuary ",2020,September,Fall,0.33,"Roughly months 1,3,6,9 etc.",4,NA,ND,Mid,ND,ND,188,1.5,ND,112,80,ND,20,NA,"Plot persistence and asking is shoot density the same or higher than planted density? If so, that is considered success.",NA,Y,algal % cover=5,ND,Y,Y,Y,Y,ND,Y,Y,Y,ND,"CDMO Database, SWMP data",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SouthSlough_ValinoIsl,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Low_TC_Q20_Sep20,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Low_TC_Q20_Sep20_1mo,NA,"South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Coos Bay,Valino Island Restoration,43.38,-124.3,OR,Z. japonica,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,"Transplanting using Kat Handbook Technique; galvanized garden staples, 2 shoots per staple tranplanted in plot array, typically 0.25m44",Planted 12 plots; will continue adding plots regularly to test effect of transplant timing on success,Y,"Donor bed (Clam Island) is near mouth and stable, SeagrassNet plots which are right next to restoration (some) lost a lot of seagrass and not therefore considered reference/donor",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"SeagrassNet plots died, now comparing to bed near mouth of estuary ",2020,September,Fall,0.33,"Roughly months 1,3,6,9 etc.",1,NA,ND,Low,ND,ND,188,1.5,ND,152,36,ND,20,NA,"Plot persistence and asking is shoot density the same or higher than planted density? If so, that is considered success.",NA,Y,algal % cover=5,ND,Y,Y,Y,Y,ND,Y,Y,Y,ND,"CDMO Database, SWMP data",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SouthSlough_ValinoIsl,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Low_TC_Q20_Sep20,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Low_TC_Q20_Sep20_4mo,NA,"South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Coos Bay,Valino Island Restoration,43.38,-124.3,OR,Z. japonica,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,"Transplanting using Kat Handbook Technique; galvanized garden staples, 2 shoots per staple tranplanted in plot array, typically 0.25m45",Planted 12 plots; will continue adding plots regularly to test effect of transplant timing on success,Y,"Donor bed (Clam Island) is near mouth and stable, SeagrassNet plots which are right next to restoration (some) lost a lot of seagrass and not therefore considered reference/donor",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"SeagrassNet plots died, now comparing to bed near mouth of estuary ",2020,September,Fall,0.33,"Roughly months 1,3,6,9 etc.",4,NA,ND,Low,ND,ND,188,1.5,ND,152,140,ND,75,NA,"Plot persistence and asking is shoot density the same or higher than planted density? If so, that is considered success.",NA,Y,algal % cover=15,ND,Y,Y,Y,Y,ND,Y,Y,Y,ND,"CDMO Database, SWMP data",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SouthSlough_ValinoIsl,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Low_TC_Q40_Sep20,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Low_TC_Q40_Sep20_1mo,NA,"South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Coos Bay,Valino Island Restoration,43.38,-124.3,OR,Z. japonica,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,"Transplanting using Kat Handbook Technique; galvanized garden staples, 2 shoots per staple tranplanted in plot array, typically 0.25m46",Planted 12 plots; will continue adding plots regularly to test effect of transplant timing on success,Y,"Donor bed (Clam Island) is near mouth and stable, SeagrassNet plots which are right next to restoration (some) lost a lot of seagrass and not therefore considered reference/donor",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"SeagrassNet plots died, now comparing to bed near mouth of estuary ",2020,September,Fall,0.33,"Roughly months 1,3,6,9 etc.",1,NA,ND,Low,ND,ND,188,1.5,ND,52,140,ND,80,NA,"Plot persistence and asking is shoot density the same or higher than planted density? If so, that is considered success.",NA,Y,algal % cover=50,ND,Y,Y,Y,Y,ND,Y,Y,Y,ND,"CDMO Database, SWMP data",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SouthSlough_ValinoIsl,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Low_TC_Q40_Sep20,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Low_TC_Q40_Sep20_4mo,NA,"South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Coos Bay,Valino Island Restoration,43.38,-124.3,OR,Z. japonica,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,"Transplanting using Kat Handbook Technique; galvanized garden staples, 2 shoots per staple tranplanted in plot array, typically 0.25m47",Planted 12 plots; will continue adding plots regularly to test effect of transplant timing on success,Y,"Donor bed (Clam Island) is near mouth and stable, SeagrassNet plots which are right next to restoration (some) lost a lot of seagrass and not therefore considered reference/donor",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"SeagrassNet plots died, now comparing to bed near mouth of estuary ",2020,September,Fall,0.33,"Roughly months 1,3,6,9 etc.",4,NA,ND,Low,ND,ND,188,1.5,ND,52,156,ND,50,NA,"Plot persistence and asking is shoot density the same or higher than planted density? If so, that is considered success.",NA,Y,algal % cover=10,ND,Y,Y,Y,Y,ND,Y,Y,Y,ND,"CDMO Database, SWMP data",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SouthSlough_ValinoIsl,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Low_TC_Q69_Sep20,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Low_TC_Q69_Sep20_1mo,NA,"South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Coos Bay,Valino Island Restoration,43.38,-124.3,OR,Z. japonica,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,"Transplanting using Kat Handbook Technique; galvanized garden staples, 2 shoots per staple tranplanted in plot array, typically 0.25m48",Planted 12 plots; will continue adding plots regularly to test effect of transplant timing on success,Y,"Donor bed (Clam Island) is near mouth and stable, SeagrassNet plots which are right next to restoration (some) lost a lot of seagrass and not therefore considered reference/donor",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"SeagrassNet plots died, now comparing to bed near mouth of estuary ",2020,September,Fall,0.33,"Roughly months 1,3,6,9 etc.",1,NA,ND,Low,ND,ND,188,1.5,ND,176,132,ND,60,NA,"Plot persistence and asking is shoot density the same or higher than planted density? If so, that is considered success.",NA,Y,algal % cover=30,ND,Y,Y,Y,Y,ND,Y,Y,Y,ND,"CDMO Database, SWMP data",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SouthSlough_ValinoIsl,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Low_TC_Q69_Sep20,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Low_TC_Q69_Sep20_4mo,NA,"South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Coos Bay,Valino Island Restoration,43.38,-124.3,OR,Z. japonica,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,"Transplanting using Kat Handbook Technique; galvanized garden staples, 2 shoots per staple tranplanted in plot array, typically 0.25m49",Planted 12 plots; will continue adding plots regularly to test effect of transplant timing on success,Y,"Donor bed (Clam Island) is near mouth and stable, SeagrassNet plots which are right next to restoration (some) lost a lot of seagrass and not therefore considered reference/donor",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"SeagrassNet plots died, now comparing to bed near mouth of estuary ",2020,September,Fall,0.33,"Roughly months 1,3,6,9 etc.",4,NA,ND,Low,ND,ND,188,1.5,ND,176,168,ND,50,NA,"Plot persistence and asking is shoot density the same or higher than planted density? If so, that is considered success.",NA,Y,algal % cover=5,ND,Y,Y,Y,Y,ND,Y,Y,Y,ND,"CDMO Database, SWMP data",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SouthSlough_ValinoIsl,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Mid_TB_Q33_Dec20,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Mid_TB_Q33_Dec20_1mo,NA,"South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Coos Bay,Valino Island Restoration,43.38,-124.3,OR,Z. japonica,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,"Transplanting using Kat Handbook Technique; galvanized garden staples, 2 shoots per staple tranplanted in plot array, typically 0.25m50",Planted 12 plots; will continue adding plots regularly to test effect of transplant timing on success,Y,"Donor bed (Clam Island) is near mouth and stable, SeagrassNet plots which are right next to restoration (some) lost a lot of seagrass and not therefore considered reference/donor",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"SeagrassNet plots died, now comparing to bed near mouth of estuary ",2020,December,Winter,0.33,"Roughly months 1,3,6,9 etc.",1,NA,ND,Mid,ND,ND,168,1.5,ND,136,8,ND,1,NA,"Plot persistence and asking is shoot density the same or higher than planted density? If so, that is considered success.",NA,Y,algal % cover=0,ND,Y,Y,Y,Y,ND,Y,Y,Y,ND,"CDMO Database, SWMP data",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SouthSlough_ValinoIsl,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Mid_TB_Q6_Dec20,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Mid_TB_Q6_Dec20_1mo,NA,"South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Coos Bay,Valino Island Restoration,43.38,-124.3,OR,Z. japonica,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,"Transplanting using Kat Handbook Technique; galvanized garden staples, 2 shoots per staple tranplanted in plot array, typically 0.25m51",Planted 12 plots; will continue adding plots regularly to test effect of transplant timing on success,Y,"Donor bed (Clam Island) is near mouth and stable, SeagrassNet plots which are right next to restoration (some) lost a lot of seagrass and not therefore considered reference/donor",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"SeagrassNet plots died, now comparing to bed near mouth of estuary ",2020,December,Winter,0.33,"Roughly months 1,3,6,9 etc.",1,NA,ND,Mid,ND,ND,168,1.5,ND,112,132,ND,50,NA,"Plot persistence and asking is shoot density the same or higher than planted density? If so, that is considered success.",NA,Y,algal % cover=5,ND,Y,Y,Y,Y,ND,Y,Y,Y,ND,"CDMO Database, SWMP data",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SouthSlough_ValinoIsl,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Mid_TB_Q77_Dec20,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Mid_TB_Q77_Dec20_1mo,NA,"South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Coos Bay,Valino Island Restoration,43.38,-124.3,OR,Z. japonica,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,"Transplanting using Kat Handbook Technique; galvanized garden staples, 2 shoots per staple tranplanted in plot array, typically 0.25m52",Planted 12 plots; will continue adding plots regularly to test effect of transplant timing on success,Y,"Donor bed (Clam Island) is near mouth and stable, SeagrassNet plots which are right next to restoration (some) lost a lot of seagrass and not therefore considered reference/donor",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"SeagrassNet plots died, now comparing to bed near mouth of estuary ",2020,December,Winter,0.33,"Roughly months 1,3,6,9 etc.",1,NA,ND,Mid,ND,ND,168,1.5,ND,88,104,ND,55,NA,"Plot persistence and asking is shoot density the same or higher than planted density? If so, that is considered success.",NA,Y,algal % cover=10,ND,Y,Y,Y,Y,ND,Y,Y,Y,ND,"CDMO Database, SWMP data",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SouthSlough_ValinoIsl,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Low_TC_Q33_Dec20,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Low_TC_Q33_Dec20_1mo,NA,"South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Coos Bay,Valino Island Restoration,43.38,-124.3,OR,Z. japonica,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,"Transplanting using Kat Handbook Technique; galvanized garden staples, 2 shoots per staple tranplanted in plot array, typically 0.25m53",Planted 12 plots; will continue adding plots regularly to test effect of transplant timing on success,Y,"Donor bed (Clam Island) is near mouth and stable, SeagrassNet plots which are right next to restoration (some) lost a lot of seagrass and not therefore considered reference/donor",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"SeagrassNet plots died, now comparing to bed near mouth of estuary ",2020,December,Winter,0.33,"Roughly months 1,3,6,9 etc.",1,NA,ND,Low,ND,ND,168,1.5,ND,92,80,ND,40,NA,"Plot persistence and asking is shoot density the same or higher than planted density? If so, that is considered success.",NA,Y,algal % cover=5,ND,Y,Y,Y,Y,ND,Y,Y,Y,ND,"CDMO Database, SWMP data",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SouthSlough_ValinoIsl,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Low_TC_Q6_Dec20,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Low_TC_Q6_Dec20_1mo,NA,"South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Coos Bay,Valino Island Restoration,43.38,-124.3,OR,Z. japonica,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,"Transplanting using Kat Handbook Technique; galvanized garden staples, 2 shoots per staple tranplanted in plot array, typically 0.25m54",Planted 12 plots; will continue adding plots regularly to test effect of transplant timing on success,Y,"Donor bed (Clam Island) is near mouth and stable, SeagrassNet plots which are right next to restoration (some) lost a lot of seagrass and not therefore considered reference/donor",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"SeagrassNet plots died, now comparing to bed near mouth of estuary ",2020,December,Winter,0.33,"Roughly months 1,3,6,9 etc.",1,NA,ND,Low,ND,ND,168,1.5,ND,152,80,ND,35,NA,"Plot persistence and asking is shoot density the same or higher than planted density? If so, that is considered success.",NA,Y,algal % cover=15,ND,Y,Y,Y,Y,ND,Y,Y,Y,ND,"CDMO Database, SWMP data",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SouthSlough_ValinoIsl,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Low_TC_Q77_Dec20,SouthSlough_ValinoIsl_Low_TC_Q77_Dec20_1mo,NA,"South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, Oregon Dept. of State Lands",Coos Bay,Valino Island Restoration,43.38,-124.3,OR,Z. japonica,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,"Transplanting using Kat Handbook Technique; galvanized garden staples, 2 shoots per staple tranplanted in plot array, typically 0.25m55",Planted 12 plots; will continue adding plots regularly to test effect of transplant timing on success,Y,"Donor bed (Clam Island) is near mouth and stable, SeagrassNet plots which are right next to restoration (some) lost a lot of seagrass and not therefore considered reference/donor",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"SeagrassNet plots died, now comparing to bed near mouth of estuary ",2020,December,Winter,0.33,"Roughly months 1,3,6,9 etc.",1,NA,ND,Low,ND,ND,168,1.5,ND,92,96,ND,40,NA,"Plot persistence and asking is shoot density the same or higher than planted density? If so, that is considered success.",NA,Y,algal % cover=10,ND,Y,Y,Y,Y,ND,Y,Y,Y,ND,"CDMO Database, SWMP data",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SaltRiver_ChannelCreation,SaltRiver_Z1,SaltRiver_Z1_12mo,Grey literature,Humboldt County Resource Conservation District,Eel River ,Salt River,40.62,-124.3,N. Cal,Z. japonica,N,Mitigation,Passive,N,Passive,Created tidal slough channels that share similar hydraulic and geomorphic characteristics of the existing Salt River channel and assumed suitable eelgrass habitat.,NA,Y,NA,13909,25084,71,ND,132,ND,NA,NA,Ref Zone 1,2013,ND,NA,3,annually,12,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,70719,ND,ND,63,26,ND,NA,NA,"""within three years of completion of the project (both phases), the entire pre-construction eelgrass area plus the restored areas suitable for eelgrass recruitment shallhave an extent of vegetative cover equal to at least 1.2 times the impacted area and havean average density equal to the pre-construction average density"" (California CoastalCommission special conditions for CDP 1-10-32-Eelgrass)""",Y,Y,"Shoot density data come from table 5.1 on page 14. They say they met all the success criteria on a project level, but this seems like a stretch (their shoot densities are declining, but they still tenchincally end up higher than the pre-construction densities). They write ""Between 2013 and 2015, Z. marina average density in the Salt River increased by 1.45%.Therefore, the project has reached the shoot density criteria goal of being equal to pre-construction shoot density. Between 2013 and 2016, Z. marina average density in the Salt River increased by 47%."" 
Note: there are some % cover data repoerted, but too confusing and poorly reported to be reliable. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SaltRiver_ChannelCreation,SaltRiver_Z1,SaltRiver_Z1_24mo,Grey literature,Humboldt County Resource Conservation District,Eel River ,Salt River,40.62,-124.3,N. Cal,Z. japonica,N,Mitigation,Passive,N,Passive,Created tidal slough channels that share similar hydraulic and geomorphic characteristics of the existing Salt River channel and assumed suitable eelgrass habitat.,NA,Y,NA,13909,11382,71,ND,2,ND,NA,NA,Ref Zone 1,2013,ND,NA,3,annually,24,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,70719,ND,ND,63,71,ND,NA,NA,"""within three years of completion of the project (both phases), the entire pre-construction eelgrass area plus the restored areas suitable for eelgrass recruitment shallhave an extent of vegetative cover equal to at least 1.2 times the impacted area and havean average density equal to the pre-construction average density"" (California CoastalCommission special conditions for CDP 1-10-32-Eelgrass).",Y,Y,"Shoot density data come from table 5.1 on page 14. They say they met all the success criteria on a project level, but this seems like a stretch (their shoot densities are declining, but they still tenchincally end up higher than the pre-construction densities). They write ""Between 2013 and 2015, Z. marina average density in the Salt River increased by 1.45%.Therefore, the project has reached the shoot density criteria goal of being equal to pre-construction shoot density. Between 2013 and 2016, Z. marina average density in the Salt River increased by 47%."" 
Note: there are some % cover data repoerted, but too confusing and poorly reported to be reliable. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SaltRiver_ChannelCreation,SaltRiver_Z1,SaltRiver_Z1_36mo,Grey literature,Humboldt County Resource Conservation District,Eel River ,Salt River,40.62,-124.3,N. Cal,Z. japonica,N,Mitigation,Passive,N,Passive,Created tidal slough channels that share similar hydraulic and geomorphic characteristics of the existing Salt River channel and assumed suitable eelgrass habitat.,NA,Y,NA,13909,0,71,ND,0,ND,NA,NA,Ref Zone 1,2013,ND,NA,3,annually,36,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,70719,ND,ND,63,92.8,ND,NA,NA,"""within three years of completion of the project (both phases), the entire pre-construction eelgrass area plus the restored areas suitable for eelgrass recruitment shallhave an extent of vegetative cover equal to at least 1.2 times the impacted area and have an average density equal to the pre-construction average density"" (California CoastalCommission special conditions for CDP 1-10-32-Eelgrass).",Y,Y,"Shoot density data come from table 5.1 on page 14. They say they met all the success criteria on a project level, but this seems like a stretch (their shoot densities are declining, but they still tenchincally end up higher than the pre-construction densities). They write ""Between 2013 and 2015, Z. marina average density in the Salt River increased by 1.45%.Therefore, the project has reached the shoot density criteria goal of being equal to pre-construction shoot density. Between 2013 and 2016, Z. marina average density in the Salt River increased by 47%."" 
Note: there are some % cover data repoerted, but too confusing and poorly reported to be reliable. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SaltRiver_ChannelCreation,SaltRiver_Z2,SaltRiver_Z2_2014,Grey literature,Humboldt County Resource Conservation District,Eel River ,Salt River,40.62,-124.3,N. Cal,Z. japonica,N,Mitigation,Passive,N,Passive,Created tidal slough channels that share similar hydraulic and geomorphic characteristics of the existing Salt River channel and assumed suitable eelgrass habitat.,NA,Y,NA,95074,49976,295,ND,242,ND,NA,NA,Ref Zone 2,2013,ND,NA,3,annually,12,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,233524,ND,ND,207,23,ND,NA,NA,"""within three years of completion of the project (both phases), the entire pre-construction eelgrass area plus the restored areas suitable for eelgrass recruitment shallhave an extent of vegetative cover equal to at least 1.2 times the impacted area and havean average density equal to the pre-construction average density"" (California CoastalCommission special conditions for CDP 1-10-32-Eelgrass).",Y,Y,"Shoot density data come from table 5.1 on page 14. They say they met all the success criteria on a project level, but this seems like a stretch (their shoot densities are declining, but they still tenchincally end up higher than the pre-construction densities). They write ""Between 2013 and 2015, Z. marina average density in the Salt River increased by 1.45%.Therefore, the project has reached the shoot density criteria goal of being equal to pre-construction shoot density. Between 2013 and 2016, Z. marina average density in the Salt River increased by 47%."" 
Note: there are some % cover data repoerted, but too confusing and poorly reported to be reliable. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SaltRiver_ChannelCreation,SaltRiver_Z2,SaltRiver_Z2_2015,Grey literature,Humboldt County Resource Conservation District,Eel River ,Salt River,40.62,-124.3,N. Cal,Z. japonica,N,Mitigation,Passive,N,Passive,Created tidal slough channels that share similar hydraulic and geomorphic characteristics of the existing Salt River channel and assumed suitable eelgrass habitat.,NA,Y,NA,95074,0,295,ND,0,ND,NA,NA,Ref Zone 2,2013,ND,NA,3,annually,24,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,233524,ND,ND,207,121,ND,NA,NA,"""within three years of completion of the project (both phases), the entire pre-construction eelgrass area plus the restored areas suitable for eelgrass recruitment shallhave an extent of vegetative cover equal to at least 1.2 times the impacted area and havean average density equal to the pre-construction average density"" (California CoastalCommission special conditions for CDP 1-10-32-Eelgrass).",Y,Y,"Shoot density data come from table 5.1 on page 14. They say they met all the success criteria on a project level, but this seems like a stretch (their shoot densities are declining, but they still tenchincally end up higher than the pre-construction densities). They write ""Between 2013 and 2015, Z. marina average density in the Salt River increased by 1.45%.Therefore, the project has reached the shoot density criteria goal of being equal to pre-construction shoot density. Between 2013 and 2016, Z. marina average density in the Salt River increased by 47%."" 
Note: there are some % cover data repoerted, but too confusing and poorly reported to be reliable. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SaltRiver_ChannelCreation,SaltRiver_Z2,SaltRiver_Z2_2016,Grey literature,Humboldt County Resource Conservation District,Eel River ,Salt River,40.62,-124.3,N. Cal,Z. japonica,N,Mitigation,Passive,N,Passive,Created tidal slough channels that share similar hydraulic and geomorphic characteristics of the existing Salt River channel and assumed suitable eelgrass habitat.,NA,Y,NA,95074,0,295,ND,0,ND,NA,NA,Ref Zone 2,2013,ND,NA,3,annually,36,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,233524,ND,ND,207,198.3,ND,NA,NA,"""within three years of completion of the project (both phases), the entire pre-construction eelgrass area plus the restored areas suitable for eelgrass recruitment shallhave an extent of vegetative cover equal to at least 1.2 times the impacted area and havean average density equal to the pre-construction average density"" (California CoastalCommission special conditions for CDP 1-10-32-Eelgrass).",Y,Y,"Shoot density data come from table 5.1 on page 14. They say they met all the success criteria on a project level, but this seems like a stretch (their shoot densities are declining, but they still tenchincally end up higher than the pre-construction densities). They write ""Between 2013 and 2015, Z. marina average density in the Salt River increased by 1.45%.Therefore, the project has reached the shoot density criteria goal of being equal to pre-construction shoot density. Between 2013 and 2016, Z. marina average density in the Salt River increased by 47%."" 
Note: there are some % cover data repoerted, but too confusing and poorly reported to be reliable. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SaltRiver_ChannelCreation,SaltRiver_Z3,SaltRiver_Z3_2014,Grey literature,Humboldt County Resource Conservation District,Eel River ,Salt River,40.62,-124.3,N. Cal,Z. japonica,N,Mitigation,Passive,N,Passive,Created tidal slough channels that share similar hydraulic and geomorphic characteristics of the existing Salt River channel and assumed suitable eelgrass habitat.,NA,Y,NA,126512,49976,370,ND,241,ND,NA,NA,Ref Zone 3,2013,ND,NA,3,annually,12,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,225700,ND,ND,200,35,ND,NA,NA,"""within three years of completion of the project (both phases), the entire pre-construction eelgrass area plus the restored areas suitable for eelgrass recruitment shallhave an extent of vegetative cover equal to at least 1.2 times the impacted area and havean average density equal to the pre-construction average density"" (California CoastalCommission special conditions for CDP 1-10-32-Eelgrass).",Y,Y,"Shoot density data come from table 5.1 on page 14. They say they met all the success criteria on a project level, but this seems like a stretch (their shoot densities are declining, but they still tenchincally end up higher than the pre-construction densities). They write ""Between 2013 and 2015, Z. marina average density in the Salt River increased by 1.45%.Therefore, the project has reached the shoot density criteria goal of being equal to pre-construction shoot density. Between 2013 and 2016, Z. marina average density in the Salt River increased by 47%."" 
Note: there are some % cover data repoerted, but too confusing and poorly reported to be reliable. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SaltRiver_ChannelCreation,SaltRiver_Z3,SaltRiver_Z3_2015,Grey literature,Humboldt County Resource Conservation District,Eel River ,Salt River,40.62,-124.3,N. Cal,Z. japonica,N,Mitigation,Passive,N,Passive,Created tidal slough channels that share similar hydraulic and geomorphic characteristics of the existing Salt River channel and assumed suitable eelgrass habitat.,NA,Y,NA,126512,0,370,ND,0,ND,NA,NA,Ref Zone 3,2013,ND,NA,3,annually,24,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,225700,ND,ND,200,140,ND,NA,NA,"""within three years of completion of the project (both phases), the entire pre-construction eelgrass area plus the restored areas suitable for eelgrass recruitment shallhave an extent of vegetative cover equal to at least 1.2 times the impacted area and havean average density equal to the pre-construction average density"" (California CoastalCommission special conditions for CDP 1-10-32-Eelgrass).",Y,Y,"Shoot density data come from table 5.1 on page 14. They say they met all the success criteria on a project level, but this seems like a stretch (their shoot densities are declining, but they still tenchincally end up higher than the pre-construction densities). They write ""Between 2013 and 2015, Z. marina average density in the Salt River increased by 1.45%.Therefore, the project has reached the shoot density criteria goal of being equal to pre-construction shoot density. Between 2013 and 2016, Z. marina average density in the Salt River increased by 47%."" 
Note: there are some % cover data repoerted, but too confusing and poorly reported to be reliable. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SaltRiver_ChannelCreation,SaltRiver_Z3,SaltRiver_Z3_2016,Grey literature,Humboldt County Resource Conservation District,Eel River ,Salt River,40.62,-124.3,N. Cal,Z. japonica,N,Mitigation,Passive,N,Passive,Created tidal slough channels that share similar hydraulic and geomorphic characteristics of the existing Salt River channel and assumed suitable eelgrass habitat.,NA,Y,NA,126512,0,370,ND,0,ND,NA,NA,Ref Zone 3,2013,ND,NA,3,annually,36,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,225700,ND,ND,200,332.5,ND,NA,NA,"""within three years of completion of the project (both phases), the entire pre-construction eelgrass area plus the restored areas suitable for eelgrass recruitment shallhave an extent of vegetative cover equal to at least 1.2 times the impacted area and havean average density equal to the pre-construction average density"" (California CoastalCommission special conditions for CDP 1-10-32-Eelgrass).",Y,Y,"Shoot density data come from table 5.1 on page 14. They say they met all the success criteria on a project level, but this seems like a stretch (their shoot densities are declining, but they still tenchincally end up higher than the pre-construction densities). They write ""Between 2013 and 2015, Z. marina average density in the Salt River increased by 1.45%.Therefore, the project has reached the shoot density criteria goal of being equal to pre-construction shoot density. Between 2013 and 2016, Z. marina average density in the Salt River increased by 47%."" 
Note: there are some % cover data repoerted, but too confusing and poorly reported to be reliable. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SaltRiver_ChannelCreation,SaltRiver_Z4,SaltRiver_Z4_2014,Grey literature,Humboldt County Resource Conservation District,Eel River ,Salt River,40.62,-124.3,N. Cal,Z. japonica,N,Mitigation,Passive,N,Passive,Created tidal slough channels that share similar hydraulic and geomorphic characteristics of the existing Salt River channel and assumed suitable eelgrass habitat.,NA,Y,NA,42672,39269,113,ND,166,ND,NA,NA,Ref Zone 4,2013,ND,NA,3,annually,12,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,94384,ND,ND,84,87,ND,NA,NA,"""within three years of completion of the project (both phases), the entire pre-construction eelgrass area plus the restored areas suitable for eelgrass recruitment shallhave an extent of vegetative cover equal to at least 1.2 times the impacted area and havean average density equal to the pre-construction average density"" (California Coastal Commission special conditions for CDP 1-10-32-Eelgrass).",Y,Y,"Shoot density data come from table 5.1 on page 14. They say they met all the success criteria on a project level, but this seems like a stretch (their shoot densities are declining, but they still tenchincally end up higher than the pre-construction densities). They write ""Between 2013 and 2015, Z. marina average density in the Salt River increased by 1.45%.Therefore, the project has reached the shoot density criteria goal of being equal to pre-construction shoot density. Between 2013 and 2016, Z. marina average density in the Salt River increased by 47%."" 
Note: there are some % cover data repoerted, but too confusing and poorly reported to be reliable. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SaltRiver_ChannelCreation,SaltRiver_Z4,SaltRiver_Z4_2015,Grey literature,Humboldt County Resource Conservation District,Eel River ,Salt River,40.62,-124.3,N. Cal,Z. japonica,N,Mitigation,Passive,N,Passive,Created tidal slough channels that share similar hydraulic and geomorphic characteristics of the existing Salt River channel and assumed suitable eelgrass habitat.,NA,Y,NA,42672,0,113,ND,0,ND,NA,NA,Ref Zone 4,2013,ND,NA,3,annually,24,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,94384,ND,ND,84,230,ND,NA,NA,"""within three years of completion of the project (both phases), the entire pre-construction eelgrass area plus the restored areas suitable for eelgrass recruitment shallhave an extent of vegetative cover equal to at least 1.2 times the impacted area and havean average density equal to the pre-construction average density"" (California CoastalCommission special conditions for CDP 1-10-32-Eelgrass).",Y,Y,"Shoot density data come from table 5.1 on page 14. They say they met all the success criteria on a project level, but this seems like a stretch (their shoot densities are declining, but they still tenchincally end up higher than the pre-construction densities). They write ""Between 2013 and 2015, Z. marina average density in the Salt River increased by 1.45%.Therefore, the project has reached the shoot density criteria goal of being equal to pre-construction shoot density. Between 2013 and 2016, Z. marina average density in the Salt River increased by 47%."" 
Note: there are some % cover data repoerted, but too confusing and poorly reported to be reliable. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SaltRiver_ChannelCreation,SaltRiver_Z4,SaltRiver_Z4_2016,Grey literature,Humboldt County Resource Conservation District,Eel River ,Salt River,40.62,-124.3,N. Cal,Z. japonica,N,Mitigation,Passive,N,Passive,Created tidal slough channels that share similar hydraulic and geomorphic characteristics of the existing Salt River channel and assumed suitable eelgrass habitat.,NA,Y,NA,42672,0,113,ND,0,ND,NA,NA,Ref Zone 4,2013,ND,NA,3,annually,36,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,94384,ND,ND,84,187,ND,NA,NA,"""within three years of completion of the project (both phases), the entire pre-construction eelgrass area plus the restored areas suitable for eelgrass recruitment shallhave an extent of vegetative cover equal to at least 1.2 times the impacted area and havean average density equal to the pre-construction average density"" (California CoastalCommission special conditions for CDP 1-10-32-Eelgrass).",Y,Y,"Shoot density data come from table 5.1 on page 14. They say they met all the success criteria on a project level, but this seems like a stretch (their shoot densities are declining, but they still tenchincally end up higher than the pre-construction densities). They write ""Between 2013 and 2015, Z. marina average density in the Salt River increased by 1.45%.Therefore, the project has reached the shoot density criteria goal of being equal to pre-construction shoot density. Between 2013 and 2016, Z. marina average density in the Salt River increased by 47%."" 
Note: there are some % cover data repoerted, but too confusing and poorly reported to be reliable. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Tomales_MooringRemoval,Tomales_MooringRemoval_MN17,Tomales_MooringRemoval_MN17_12mo,Grey literature,"GFNMS, Merkel",Tomales Bay,Duck Cove,38.14,-122.89,N. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Passive,N,Passive,Removal of old mooring balls and materials,NA,Y,NA,2332,2461,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"They monitor the entire meadow over before and after gear removal, showing overall trends, not just in the area of the mooring removal. This means that filling in due to the gear removal is included in the reference, alothough the area of the mooring scars was very small compared to the size of the meadow, and in most cases (see maps) doesn't affect this at all. If data are used, just check maps first. In some cases, lack of recovery in the removal site is attributed to the natural bed retraction. ",2016,ND,ND,1,once (~12 mo following gear removal),12,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,0,0,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Loosley define 'success' here as increase in eelgrass in the ""holes"" made from the old moorings, although acknowledge other factors are at play. ",N,ND,NA,Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Only note wasting disease anecdotally, but believe it is a driver of loss in the bay at the time of the study",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Tomales_MooringRemoval,Tomales_MooringRemoval_MN22,Tomales_MooringRemoval_MN22_12mo,Grey literature,"GFNMS, Merkel",Tomales Bay,Marconi,38.14,-122.89,N. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Passive,N,Passive,Removal of old mooring balls and materials,NA,Y,NA,4676,6917,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"They monitor the entire meadow over before and after gear removal, showing overall trends, not just in the area of the mooring removal. This means that filling in due to the gear removal is included in the reference, alothough the area of the mooring scars was very small compared to the size of the meadow, and in most cases (see maps) doesn't affect this at all. If data are used, just check maps first. In some cases, lack of recovery in the removal site is attributed to the natural bed retraction. ",2016,ND,ND,1,once (~12 mo following gear removal),12,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,0,0,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Loosley define 'success' here as increase in eelgrass in the ""holes"" made from the old moorings, although acknowledge other factors are at play. ",N,ND,NA,Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Only note wasting disease anecdotally, but believe it is a driver of loss in the bay at the time of the study",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Tomales_MooringRemoval,Tomales_MooringRemoval_MN26,Tomales_MooringRemoval_MN26_12mo,Grey literature,"GFNMS, Merkel",Tomales Bay,Marconi,38.14,-122.89,N. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Passive,N,Passive,Removal of old mooring balls and materials,NA,Y,NA,12511,11223,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"They monitor the entire meadow over before and after gear removal, showing overall trends, not just in the area of the mooring removal. This means that filling in due to the gear removal is included in the reference, alothough the area of the mooring scars was very small compared to the size of the meadow, and in most cases (see maps) doesn't affect this at all. If data are used, just check maps first. In some cases, lack of recovery in the removal site is attributed to the natural bed retraction. ",2016,ND,ND,1,once (~12 mo following gear removal),12,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,206,9,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Loosley define 'success' here as increase in eelgrass in the ""holes"" made from the old moorings, although acknowledge other factors are at play. ",N,ND,NA,Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Only note wasting disease anecdotally, but believe it is a driver of loss in the bay at the time of the study",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Tomales_MooringRemoval,Tomales_MooringRemoval_MN30,Tomales_MooringRemoval_MN30_12mo,Grey literature,"GFNMS, Merkel",Tomales Bay,Marconi,38.14,-122.89,N. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Passive,N,Passive,Removal of old mooring balls and materials,NA,Y,NA,5266,4598,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"They monitor the entire meadow over before and after gear removal, showing overall trends, not just in the area of the mooring removal. This means that filling in due to the gear removal is included in the reference, alothough the area of the mooring scars was very small compared to the size of the meadow, and in most cases (see maps) doesn't affect this at all. If data are used, just check maps first. In some cases, lack of recovery in the removal site is attributed to the natural bed retraction. ",2016,ND,ND,1,once (~12 mo following gear removal),12,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,19,13,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Loosley define 'success' here as increase in eelgrass in the ""holes"" made from the old moorings, although acknowledge other factors are at play. ",N,ND,NA,Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Only note wasting disease anecdotally, but believe it is a driver of loss in the bay at the time of the study",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Tomales_MooringRemoval,Tomales_MooringRemoval_MN35,Tomales_MooringRemoval_MN35_12mo,Grey literature,"GFNMS, Merkel",Tomales Bay,Teachers beach,38.14,-122.89,N. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Passive,N,Passive,Removal of old mooring balls and materials,NA,Y,NA,16823,12365,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"They monitor the entire meadow over before and after gear removal, showing overall trends, not just in the area of the mooring removal. This means that filling in due to the gear removal is included in the reference, alothough the area of the mooring scars was very small compared to the size of the meadow, and in most cases (see maps) doesn't affect this at all. If data are used, just check maps first. In some cases, lack of recovery in the removal site is attributed to the natural bed retraction. ",2016,ND,ND,1,once (~12 mo following gear removal),12,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,286,178,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Loosley define 'success' here as increase in eelgrass in the ""holes"" made from the old moorings, although acknowledge other factors are at play. ",N,ND,NA,Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Only note wasting disease anecdotally, but believe it is a driver of loss in the bay at the time of the study",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Tomales_MooringRemoval,Tomales_MooringRemoval_MN35A,Tomales_MooringRemoval_MN35A_12mo,Grey literature,"GFNMS, Merkel",Tomales Bay,Teachers beach,38.14,-122.89,N. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Passive,N,Passive,Removal of old mooring balls and materials,NA,Y,NA,16823,12365,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"They monitor the entire meadow over before and after gear removal, showing overall trends, not just in the area of the mooring removal. This means that filling in due to the gear removal is included in the reference, alothough the area of the mooring scars was very small compared to the size of the meadow, and in most cases (see maps) doesn't affect this at all. If data are used, just check maps first. In some cases, lack of recovery in the removal site is attributed to the natural bed retraction. ",2016,ND,ND,1,once (~12 mo following gear removal),12,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,312,308,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Loosley define 'success' here as increase in eelgrass in the ""holes"" made from the old moorings, although acknowledge other factors are at play. ",N,ND,NA,Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Only note wasting disease anecdotally, but believe it is a driver of loss in the bay at the time of the study",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Tomales_MooringRemoval,Tomales_MooringRemoval_MN35B,Tomales_MooringRemoval_MN35B_12mo,Grey literature,"GFNMS, Merkel",Tomales Bay,Teachers beach,38.14,-122.89,N. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Passive,N,Passive,Removal of old mooring balls and materials,NA,Y,NA,16823,12365,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"They monitor the entire meadow over before and after gear removal, showing overall trends, not just in the area of the mooring removal. This means that filling in due to the gear removal is included in the reference, alothough the area of the mooring scars was very small compared to the size of the meadow, and in most cases (see maps) doesn't affect this at all. If data are used, just check maps first. In some cases, lack of recovery in the removal site is attributed to the natural bed retraction. ",2016,ND,ND,1,once (~12 mo following gear removal),12,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,178,132,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Loosley define 'success' here as increase in eelgrass in the ""holes"" made from the old moorings, although acknowledge other factors are at play. ",N,ND,NA,Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Only note wasting disease anecdotally, but believe it is a driver of loss in the bay at the time of the study",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Tomales_MooringRemoval,Tomales_MooringRemoval_MN52,Tomales_MooringRemoval_MN52_12mo,Grey literature,"GFNMS, Merkel",Tomales Bay,Reynolds,38.14,-122.89,N. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Passive,N,Passive,Removal of old mooring balls and materials,NA,Y,NA,5348,4959,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"They monitor the entire meadow over before and after gear removal, showing overall trends, not just in the area of the mooring removal. This means that filling in due to the gear removal is included in the reference, alothough the area of the mooring scars was very small compared to the size of the meadow, and in most cases (see maps) doesn't affect this at all. If data are used, just check maps first. In some cases, lack of recovery in the removal site is attributed to the natural bed retraction. ",2016,ND,ND,1,once (~12 mo following gear removal),12,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,53,9,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Loosley define 'success' here as increase in eelgrass in the ""holes"" made from the old moorings, although acknowledge other factors are at play. ",N,ND,NA,Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Only note wasting disease anecdotally, but believe it is a driver of loss in the bay at the time of the study",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Tomales_MooringRemoval,Tomales_MooringRemoval_MN97,Tomales_MooringRemoval_MN97_12mo,Grey literature,"GFNMS, Merkel",Tomales Bay,Reynolds,38.14,-122.89,N. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Passive,N,Passive,Removal of old mooring balls and materials,NA,Y,NA,7805,8439,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"They monitor the entire meadow over before and after gear removal, showing overall trends, not just in the area of the mooring removal. This means that filling in due to the gear removal is included in the reference, alothough the area of the mooring scars was very small compared to the size of the meadow, and in most cases (see maps) doesn't affect this at all. If data are used, just check maps first. In some cases, lack of recovery in the removal site is attributed to the natural bed retraction. ",2016,ND,ND,1,once (~12 mo following gear removal),12,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,252,290,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Loosley define 'success' here as increase in eelgrass in the ""holes"" made from the old moorings, although acknowledge other factors are at play. ",Y,ND,NA,Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Only note wasting disease anecdotally, but believe it is a driver of loss in the bay at the time of the study",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Tomales_MooringRemoval,Tomales_MooringRemoval_MN98,Tomales_MooringRemoval_MN98_12mo,Grey literature,"GFNMS, Merkel",Tomales Bay,Reynolds,38.14,-122.89,N. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Passive,N,Passive,Removal of old mooring balls and materials,NA,Y,NA,7805,8439,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"They monitor the entire meadow over before and after gear removal, showing overall trends, not just in the area of the mooring removal. This means that filling in due to the gear removal is included in the reference, alothough the area of the mooring scars was very small compared to the size of the meadow, and in most cases (see maps) doesn't affect this at all. If data are used, just check maps first. In some cases, lack of recovery in the removal site is attributed to the natural bed retraction. ",2016,ND,ND,1,once (~12 mo following gear removal),12,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,312,312,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Loosley define 'success' here as increase in eelgrass in the ""holes"" made from the old moorings, although acknowledge other factors are at play. ",N,ND,NA,Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Only note wasting disease anecdotally, but believe it is a driver of loss in the bay at the time of the study",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Tomales_MooringRemoval,Tomales_MooringRemoval_MN100,Tomales_MooringRemoval_MN100_12mo,Grey literature,"GFNMS, Merkel",Tomales Bay,Marshall,38.14,-122.89,N. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Passive,N,Passive,Removal of old mooring balls and materials,NA,Y,NA,10714,11348,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"They monitor the entire meadow over before and after gear removal, showing overall trends, not just in the area of the mooring removal. This means that filling in due to the gear removal is included in the reference, alothough the area of the mooring scars was very small compared to the size of the meadow, and in most cases (see maps) doesn't affect this at all. If data are used, just check maps first. In some cases, lack of recovery in the removal site is attributed to the natural bed retraction. ",2016,ND,ND,1,once (~12 mo following gear removal),12,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,0,0,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Loosley define 'success' here as increase in eelgrass in the ""holes"" made from the old moorings, although acknowledge other factors are at play. ",N,ND,NA,Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Only note wasting disease anecdotally, but believe it is a driver of loss in the bay at the time of the study",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Tomales_MooringRemoval,Tomales_MooringRemoval_MN101,Tomales_MooringRemoval_MN101_12mo,Grey literature,"GFNMS, Merkel",Tomales Bay,Marshall,38.14,-122.89,N. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Passive,N,Passive,Removal of old mooring balls and materials,NA,Y,NA,10714,11348,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"They monitor the entire meadow over before and after gear removal, showing overall trends, not just in the area of the mooring removal. This means that filling in due to the gear removal is included in the reference, alothough the area of the mooring scars was very small compared to the size of the meadow, and in most cases (see maps) doesn't affect this at all. If data are used, just check maps first. In some cases, lack of recovery in the removal site is attributed to the natural bed retraction. ",2016,ND,ND,1,once (~12 mo following gear removal),12,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,0,1,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Loosley define 'success' here as increase in eelgrass in the ""holes"" made from the old moorings, although acknowledge other factors are at play. ",NA,ND,NA,Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Only note wasting disease anecdotally, but believe it is a driver of loss in the bay at the time of the study",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Tomales_MooringRemoval,Tomales_MooringRemoval_MN102,Tomales_MooringRemoval_MN102_12mo,Grey literature,"GFNMS, Merkel",Tomales Bay,Marshall,38.14,-122.89,N. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Passive,N,Passive,Removal of old mooring balls and materials,NA,Y,NA,10714,11348,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"They monitor the entire meadow over before and after gear removal, showing overall trends, not just in the area of the mooring removal. This means that filling in due to the gear removal is included in the reference, alothough the area of the mooring scars was very small compared to the size of the meadow, and in most cases (see maps) doesn't affect this at all. If data are used, just check maps first. In some cases, lack of recovery in the removal site is attributed to the natural bed retraction. ",2016,ND,ND,1,once (~12 mo following gear removal),12,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,184,199,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Loosley define 'success' here as increase in eelgrass in the ""holes"" made from the old moorings, although acknowledge other factors are at play. ",Y,ND,NA,Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Only note wasting disease anecdotally, but believe it is a driver of loss in the bay at the time of the study",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Tomales_MooringRemoval,Tomales_MooringRemoval_MN105,Tomales_MooringRemoval_MN105_12mo,Grey literature,"GFNMS, Merkel",Tomales Bay,Marconi,38.14,-122.89,N. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Passive,N,Passive,Removal of old mooring balls and materials,NA,Y,NA,12511,11223,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"They monitor the entire meadow over before and after gear removal, showing overall trends, not just in the area of the mooring removal. This means that filling in due to the gear removal is included in the reference, alothough the area of the mooring scars was very small compared to the size of the meadow, and in most cases (see maps) doesn't affect this at all. If data are used, just check maps first. In some cases, lack of recovery in the removal site is attributed to the natural bed retraction. ",2016,ND,ND,1,once (~12 mo following gear removal),12,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,126,112,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Loosley define 'success' here as increase in eelgrass in the ""holes"" made from the old moorings, although acknowledge other factors are at play. ",N,ND,NA,Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Only note wasting disease anecdotally, but believe it is a driver of loss in the bay at the time of the study",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Tomales_MooringRemoval,Tomales_MooringRemoval_MN107,Tomales_MooringRemoval_MN107_12mo,Grey literature,"GFNMS, Merkel",Tomales Bay,Reynolds,38.14,-122.89,N. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Passive,N,Passive,Removal of old mooring balls and materials,NA,Y,NA,5348,4959,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"They monitor the entire meadow over before and after gear removal, showing overall trends, not just in the area of the mooring removal. This means that filling in due to the gear removal is included in the reference, alothough the area of the mooring scars was very small compared to the size of the meadow, and in most cases (see maps) doesn't affect this at all. If data are used, just check maps first. In some cases, lack of recovery in the removal site is attributed to the natural bed retraction. ",2016,ND,ND,1,once (~12 mo following gear removal),12,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,30,44,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Loosley define 'success' here as increase in eelgrass in the ""holes"" made from the old moorings, although acknowledge other factors are at play. ",Y,ND,NA,Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Only note wasting disease anecdotally, but believe it is a driver of loss in the bay at the time of the study",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Tomales_MooringRemoval,Tomales_MooringRemoval_MN108,Tomales_MooringRemoval_MN108_12mo,Grey literature,"GFNMS, Merkel",Tomales Bay,Marshall Boat Works,38.14,-122.89,N. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Passive,N,Passive,Removal of old mooring balls and materials,NA,Y,NA,3514,2831,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"They monitor the entire meadow over before and after gear removal, showing overall trends, not just in the area of the mooring removal. This means that filling in due to the gear removal is included in the reference, alothough the area of the mooring scars was very small compared to the size of the meadow, and in most cases (see maps) doesn't affect this at all. If data are used, just check maps first. In some cases, lack of recovery in the removal site is attributed to the natural bed retraction. ",2016,ND,ND,1,once (~12 mo following gear removal),12,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,146,127,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Loosley define 'success' here as increase in eelgrass in the ""holes"" made from the old moorings, although acknowledge other factors are at play. ",N,ND,NA,Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Only note wasting disease anecdotally, but believe it is a driver of loss in the bay at the time of the study",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Tomales_MooringRemoval,Tomales_MooringRemoval_MN112,Tomales_MooringRemoval_MN112_12mo,Grey literature,"GFNMS, Merkel",Tomales Bay,Shallow Beach,38.14,-122.89,N. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Passive,N,Passive,Removal of old mooring balls and materials,NA,Y,NA,4107,5537,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"They monitor the entire meadow over before and after gear removal, showing overall trends, not just in the area of the mooring removal. This means that filling in due to the gear removal is included in the reference, alothough the area of the mooring scars was very small compared to the size of the meadow, and in most cases (see maps) doesn't affect this at all. If data are used, just check maps first. In some cases, lack of recovery in the removal site is attributed to the natural bed retraction. ",2016,ND,ND,1,once (~12 mo following gear removal),12,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,3,2,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Loosley define 'success' here as increase in eelgrass in the ""holes"" made from the old moorings, although acknowledge other factors are at play. ",N,ND,NA,Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Only note wasting disease anecdotally, but believe it is a driver of loss in the bay at the time of the study",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Tomales_MooringRemoval,Tomales_MooringRemoval_MN113,Tomales_MooringRemoval_MN113_12mo,Grey literature,"GFNMS, Merkel",Tomales Bay,Inn at Tomales Bay,38.14,-122.89,N. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Passive,N,Passive,Removal of old mooring balls and materials,NA,Y,NA,17873,19477,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"They monitor the entire meadow over before and after gear removal, showing overall trends, not just in the area of the mooring removal. This means that filling in due to the gear removal is included in the reference, alothough the area of the mooring scars was very small compared to the size of the meadow, and in most cases (see maps) doesn't affect this at all. If data are used, just check maps first. In some cases, lack of recovery in the removal site is attributed to the natural bed retraction. ",2016,ND,ND,1,once (~12 mo following gear removal),12,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,303,312,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Loosley define 'success' here as increase in eelgrass in the ""holes"" made from the old moorings, although acknowledge other factors are at play. ",Y,ND,NA,Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Only note wasting disease anecdotally, but believe it is a driver of loss in the bay at the time of the study",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Tomales_MooringRemoval,Tomales_MooringRemoval_MN116,Tomales_MooringRemoval_MN116_12mo,Grey literature,"GFNMS, Merkel",Tomales Bay,Inn at Tomales Bay,38.14,-122.89,N. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Passive,N,Passive,Removal of old mooring balls and materials,NA,Y,NA,17873,19477,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"They monitor the entire meadow over before and after gear removal, showing overall trends, not just in the area of the mooring removal. This means that filling in due to the gear removal is included in the reference, alothough the area of the mooring scars was very small compared to the size of the meadow, and in most cases (see maps) doesn't affect this at all. If data are used, just check maps first. In some cases, lack of recovery in the removal site is attributed to the natural bed retraction. ",2016,ND,ND,1,once (~12 mo following gear removal),12,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,164,213,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Loosley define 'success' here as increase in eelgrass in the ""holes"" made from the old moorings, although acknowledge other factors are at play. ",Y,ND,NA,Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Only note wasting disease anecdotally, but believe it is a driver of loss in the bay at the time of the study",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Tomales_MooringRemoval,Tomales_MooringRemoval_MN117,Tomales_MooringRemoval_MN117_12mo,Grey literature,"GFNMS, Merkel",Tomales Bay,Inn at Tomales Bay,38.14,-122.89,N. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Passive,N,Passive,Removal of old mooring balls and materials,NA,Y,NA,17873,19477,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"They monitor the entire meadow over before and after gear removal, showing overall trends, not just in the area of the mooring removal. This means that filling in due to the gear removal is included in the reference, alothough the area of the mooring scars was very small compared to the size of the meadow, and in most cases (see maps) doesn't affect this at all. If data are used, just check maps first. In some cases, lack of recovery in the removal site is attributed to the natural bed retraction. ",2016,ND,ND,1,once (~12 mo following gear removal),12,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,98,155,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Loosley define 'success' here as increase in eelgrass in the ""holes"" made from the old moorings, although acknowledge other factors are at play. ",Y,ND,NA,Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Only note wasting disease anecdotally, but believe it is a driver of loss in the bay at the time of the study",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Tomales_MooringRemoval,Tomales_MooringRemoval_MN118,Tomales_MooringRemoval_MN118_12mo,Grey literature,"GFNMS, Merkel",Tomales Bay,Blakes Lodge,38.14,-122.89,N. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Passive,N,Passive,Removal of old mooring balls and materials,NA,Y,NA,14851,15257,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"They monitor the entire meadow over before and after gear removal, showing overall trends, not just in the area of the mooring removal. This means that filling in due to the gear removal is included in the reference, alothough the area of the mooring scars was very small compared to the size of the meadow, and in most cases (see maps) doesn't affect this at all. If data are used, just check maps first. In some cases, lack of recovery in the removal site is attributed to the natural bed retraction. ",2016,ND,ND,1,once (~12 mo following gear removal),12,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,299,312,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Loosley define 'success' here as increase in eelgrass in the ""holes"" made from the old moorings, although acknowledge other factors are at play. ",Y,ND,NA,Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Only note wasting disease anecdotally, but believe it is a driver of loss in the bay at the time of the study",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Tomales_MooringRemoval,Tomales_MooringRemoval_MN121,Tomales_MooringRemoval_MN121_12mo,Grey literature,"GFNMS, Merkel",Tomales Bay,Nicks Cove,38.14,-122.89,N. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Passive,N,Passive,Removal of old mooring balls and materials,NA,Y,NA,33575,34969,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"They monitor the entire meadow over before and after gear removal, showing overall trends, not just in the area of the mooring removal. This means that filling in due to the gear removal is included in the reference, alothough the area of the mooring scars was very small compared to the size of the meadow, and in most cases (see maps) doesn't affect this at all. If data are used, just check maps first. In some cases, lack of recovery in the removal site is attributed to the natural bed retraction. ",2016,ND,ND,1,once (~12 mo following gear removal),12,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,234,228,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Loosley define 'success' here as increase in eelgrass in the ""holes"" made from the old moorings, although acknowledge other factors are at play. ",N,ND,NA,Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Only note wasting disease anecdotally, but believe it is a driver of loss in the bay at the time of the study",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Tomales_MooringRemoval,Tomales_MooringRemoval_MN122,Tomales_MooringRemoval_MN122_12mo,Grey literature,"GFNMS, Merkel",Tomales Bay,Nicks Cove,38.14,-122.89,N. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Passive,N,Passive,Removal of old mooring balls and materials,NA,Y,NA,33575,34969,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"They monitor the entire meadow over before and after gear removal, showing overall trends, not just in the area of the mooring removal. This means that filling in due to the gear removal is included in the reference, alothough the area of the mooring scars was very small compared to the size of the meadow, and in most cases (see maps) doesn't affect this at all. If data are used, just check maps first. In some cases, lack of recovery in the removal site is attributed to the natural bed retraction. ",2016,ND,ND,1,once (~12 mo following gear removal),12,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,259,312,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Loosley define 'success' here as increase in eelgrass in the ""holes"" made from the old moorings, although acknowledge other factors are at play. ",Y,ND,NA,Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Only note wasting disease anecdotally, but believe it is a driver of loss in the bay at the time of the study",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Tomales_MooringRemoval,Tomales_MooringRemoval_MN123,Tomales_MooringRemoval_MN123_12mo,Grey literature,"GFNMS, Merkel",Tomales Bay,Nicks Cove,38.14,-122.89,N. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Passive,N,Passive,Removal of old mooring balls and materials,NA,Y,NA,33575,34969,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"They monitor the entire meadow over before and after gear removal, showing overall trends, not just in the area of the mooring removal. This means that filling in due to the gear removal is included in the reference, alothough the area of the mooring scars was very small compared to the size of the meadow, and in most cases (see maps) doesn't affect this at all. If data are used, just check maps first. In some cases, lack of recovery in the removal site is attributed to the natural bed retraction. ",2016,ND,ND,1,once (~12 mo following gear removal),12,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,82,86,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Loosley define 'success' here as increase in eelgrass in the ""holes"" made from the old moorings, although acknowledge other factors are at play. ",Y,ND,NA,Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Only note wasting disease anecdotally, but believe it is a driver of loss in the bay at the time of the study",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Tomales_MooringRemoval,Tomales_MooringRemoval_MN124,Tomales_MooringRemoval_MN124_12mo,Grey literature,"GFNMS, Merkel",Tomales Bay,Nicks Cove,38.14,-122.89,N. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Passive,N,Passive,Removal of old mooring balls and materials,NA,Y,NA,33575,34969,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"They monitor the entire meadow over before and after gear removal, showing overall trends, not just in the area of the mooring removal. This means that filling in due to the gear removal is included in the reference, alothough the area of the mooring scars was very small compared to the size of the meadow, and in most cases (see maps) doesn't affect this at all. If data are used, just check maps first. In some cases, lack of recovery in the removal site is attributed to the natural bed retraction. ",2016,ND,ND,1,once (~12 mo following gear removal),12,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,98,127,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Loosley define 'success' here as increase in eelgrass in the ""holes"" made from the old moorings, although acknowledge other factors are at play. ",Y,ND,NA,Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Only note wasting disease anecdotally, but believe it is a driver of loss in the bay at the time of the study",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Tomales_MooringRemoval,Tomales_MooringRemoval_MN125,Tomales_MooringRemoval_MN125_12mo,Grey literature,"GFNMS, Merkel",Tomales Bay,Nicks Cove,38.14,-122.89,N. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Passive,N,Passive,Removal of old mooring balls and materials,NA,Y,NA,33575,34969,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"They monitor the entire meadow over before and after gear removal, showing overall trends, not just in the area of the mooring removal. This means that filling in due to the gear removal is included in the reference, alothough the area of the mooring scars was very small compared to the size of the meadow, and in most cases (see maps) doesn't affect this at all. If data are used, just check maps first. In some cases, lack of recovery in the removal site is attributed to the natural bed retraction. ",2016,ND,ND,1,once (~12 mo following gear removal),12,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,193,245,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Loosley define 'success' here as increase in eelgrass in the ""holes"" made from the old moorings, although acknowledge other factors are at play. ",Y,ND,NA,Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Only note wasting disease anecdotally, but believe it is a driver of loss in the bay at the time of the study",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Tomales_MooringRemoval,Tomales_MooringRemoval_MN126,Tomales_MooringRemoval_MN126_12mo,Grey literature,"GFNMS, Merkel",Tomales Bay,Nicks Cove,38.14,-122.89,N. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Passive,N,Passive,Removal of old mooring balls and materials,NA,Y,NA,33575,34969,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"They monitor the entire meadow over before and after gear removal, showing overall trends, not just in the area of the mooring removal. This means that filling in due to the gear removal is included in the reference, alothough the area of the mooring scars was very small compared to the size of the meadow, and in most cases (see maps) doesn't affect this at all. If data are used, just check maps first. In some cases, lack of recovery in the removal site is attributed to the natural bed retraction. ",2016,ND,ND,1,once (~12 mo following gear removal),12,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,266,263,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Loosley define 'success' here as increase in eelgrass in the ""holes"" made from the old moorings, although acknowledge other factors are at play. ",N,ND,NA,Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Only note wasting disease anecdotally, but believe it is a driver of loss in the bay at the time of the study",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Tomales_MooringRemoval,Tomales_MooringRemoval_MN127,Tomales_MooringRemoval_MN127_12mo,Grey literature,"GFNMS, Merkel",Tomales Bay,Nicks Cove,38.14,-122.89,N. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Passive,N,Passive,Removal of old mooring balls and materials,NA,Y,NA,33575,34969,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"They monitor the entire meadow over before and after gear removal, showing overall trends, not just in the area of the mooring removal. This means that filling in due to the gear removal is included in the reference, alothough the area of the mooring scars was very small compared to the size of the meadow, and in most cases (see maps) doesn't affect this at all. If data are used, just check maps first. In some cases, lack of recovery in the removal site is attributed to the natural bed retraction. ",2016,ND,ND,1,once (~12 mo following gear removal),12,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,235,270,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Loosley define 'success' here as increase in eelgrass in the ""holes"" made from the old moorings, although acknowledge other factors are at play. ",Y,ND,NA,Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Only note wasting disease anecdotally, but believe it is a driver of loss in the bay at the time of the study",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Tomales_MooringRemoval,Tomales_MooringRemoval_MN128,Tomales_MooringRemoval_MN128_12mo,Grey literature,"GFNMS, Merkel",Tomales Bay,Nicks Cove,38.14,-122.89,N. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Passive,N,Passive,Removal of old mooring balls and materials,NA,Y,NA,33575,34969,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"They monitor the entire meadow over before and after gear removal, showing overall trends, not just in the area of the mooring removal. This means that filling in due to the gear removal is included in the reference, alothough the area of the mooring scars was very small compared to the size of the meadow, and in most cases (see maps) doesn't affect this at all. If data are used, just check maps first. In some cases, lack of recovery in the removal site is attributed to the natural bed retraction. ",2016,ND,ND,1,once (~12 mo following gear removal),12,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,186,186,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Loosley define 'success' here as increase in eelgrass in the ""holes"" made from the old moorings, although acknowledge other factors are at play. ",Y,ND,NA,Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Only note wasting disease anecdotally, but believe it is a driver of loss in the bay at the time of the study",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Tomales_MooringRemoval,Tomales_MooringRemoval_MN997,Tomales_MooringRemoval_MN997_12mo,Grey literature,"GFNMS, Merkel",Tomales Bay,Marshall,38.14,-122.89,N. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Passive,N,Passive,Removal of old mooring balls and materials,NA,Y,NA,10714,11348,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"They monitor the entire meadow over before and after gear removal, showing overall trends, not just in the area of the mooring removal. This means that filling in due to the gear removal is included in the reference, alothough the area of the mooring scars was very small compared to the size of the meadow, and in most cases (see maps) doesn't affect this at all. If data are used, just check maps first. In some cases, lack of recovery in the removal site is attributed to the natural bed retraction. ",2016,ND,ND,1,once (~12 mo following gear removal),12,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,310,312,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Loosley define 'success' here as increase in eelgrass in the ""holes"" made from the old moorings, although acknowledge other factors are at play. ",Y,ND,NA,Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Only note wasting disease anecdotally, but believe it is a driver of loss in the bay at the time of the study",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Tomales_MooringRemoval,Tomales_MooringRemoval_MN998,Tomales_MooringRemoval_MN998_12mo,Grey literature,"GFNMS, Merkel",Tomales Bay,Blakes Lodge,38.14,-122.89,N. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Passive,N,Passive,Removal of old mooring balls and materials,NA,Y,NA,14851,15257,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"They monitor the entire meadow over before and after gear removal, showing overall trends, not just in the area of the mooring removal. This means that filling in due to the gear removal is included in the reference, alothough the area of the mooring scars was very small compared to the size of the meadow, and in most cases (see maps) doesn't affect this at all. If data are used, just check maps first. In some cases, lack of recovery in the removal site is attributed to the natural bed retraction. ",2016,ND,ND,1,once (~12 mo following gear removal),12,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,172,227,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Loosley define 'success' here as increase in eelgrass in the ""holes"" made from the old moorings, although acknowledge other factors are at play. ",Y,ND,NA,Y,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,"Only note wasting disease anecdotally, but believe it is a driver of loss in the bay at the time of the study",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Drakes_DebrisRemoval,Drakes_DebrisRemoval_Low,Drakes_DebrisRemoval_2016_majordebris_2mo,Grey literature,National Parks Service,Drakes Bay,Drakes Bay,38.05,-122.94,N. Cal,Didemnum vexillum (invasive tunicate),N,Mitigation,Passive,N,Passive,Major debris,"Major debris transects that were generally devoid of eelgrass and the estero floor beneath the rack was primarily (generally > 50%) covered with oyster culture debris (plastic tubes, shell, live oysters, wire, and epiphytes on the debris).",Y,"They used control plots and only took photos, they didn't do shoot counts--everything is % cover",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Table 6 in 2019 report states that controls had a -1% change in % cover from Year 1 to 3, but otherwise ""controls"" are the standard and cover averages ~80%",2016-2017,August-May,Spring,3,"Pre, post, year 1 (4-6 mo post), year 2, year 3 (2 months was initially input as ""< 60 days"", so not exactly sure on this time stamp - MW)",2,1.2,ND,NA,ND,ND,NA,424,ND,NA,ND,ND,0,NA,Yes; meeting 1.2:1 mitigation ratio of impacted habitat,Y,ND,"Initial area restored was calculated using teh 2016-2017 report that stated the footprint of the restoration was 5 miles long and ~3.6 m wide. Mitigation requirement met (11,376sf or 249% recovery relative to required mitigation area of 4,564 sf), but coverage did not reach coverage levels seen in the reference emadow. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,N,NA,Y,In progress,Y,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Drakes_DebrisRemoval,Drakes_DebrisRemoval_Wood,Drakes_DebrisRemoval_2016_lowdebris_2mo,Grey literature,National Parks Service,Drakes Bay,Drakes Bay,38.05,-122.94,N. Cal,Didemnum vexillum (invasive tunicate),N,Mitigation,Passive,N,Passive,Low debris,"Rack transects that were under oyster racks within eelgrass beds, but were generally devoid of eelgrass directly beneath the racks. Since these racks did not have extensive bottom debris, these were good candidates for eelgrass regrowth.",Y,"They used control plots and only took photos, they didn't do shoot counts--everything is % cover",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Table 6 in 2019 report states that controls had a -1% change in % cover from Year 1 to 3, but otherwise ""controls"" are the standard and cover averages ~80%",2016-2017,August-May,Spring,3,"Pre, post, year 1 (4-6 mo post), year 2, year 3 (2 months was initially input as ""< 60 days"", so not exactly sure on this time stamp - MW)",2,1.2,ND,NA,ND,ND,NA,424,ND,NA,ND,ND,10,NA,Yes; meeting 1.2:1 mitigation ratio of impacted habitat,Y,ND,"Initial area restored was calculated using teh 2016-2017 report that stated the footprint of the restoration was 5 miles long and ~3.6 m wide. Mitigation requirement met (11,376sf or 249% recovery relative to required mitigation area of 4,564 sf), but coverage did not reach coverage levels seen in the reference emadow. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,N,NA,Y,In progress,Y,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Drakes_DebrisRemoval,Drakes_DebrisRemoval_Major,Drakes_DebrisRemoval_2016_wooddebris_2mo,Grey literature,National Parks Service,Drakes Bay,Drakes Bay,38.05,-122.94,N. Cal,Didemnum vexillum (invasive tunicate),N,Mitigation,Passive,N,Passive,Wood debris,"Stringer transects where the rack generally had eelgrass beneath the rack, but large amounts of wooden racks had fallen into the eelgrass. These plots could have suffered damage during the wood and debris removal process.",Y,"They used control plots and only took photos, they didn't do shoot counts--everything is % cover",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Table 6 in 2019 report states that controls had a -1% change in % cover from Year 1 to 3, but otherwise ""controls"" are the standard and cover averages ~80%",2016-2017,August-May,Spring,3,"Pre, post, year 1 (4-6 mo post), year 2, year 3 (2 months was initially input as ""< 60 days"", so not exactly sure on this time stamp - MW)",2,1.2,ND,NA,ND,ND,NA,424,ND,NA,ND,ND,22,NA,Yes; meeting 1.2:1 mitigation ratio of impacted habitat,Y,ND,"Initial area restored was calculated using teh 2016-2017 report that stated the footprint of the restoration was 5 miles long and ~3.6 m wide. Mitigation requirement met (11,376sf or 249% recovery relative to required mitigation area of 4,564 sf), but coverage did not reach coverage levels seen in the reference emadow. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,N,NA,Y,In progress,Y,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Drakes_DebrisRemoval,Drakes_DebrisRemoval_Low,Drakes_DebrisRemoval_2016_majordebris_12mo,Grey literature,National Parks Service,Drakes Bay,Drakes Bay,38.05,-122.94,N. Cal,Didemnum vexillum (invasive tunicate),N,Mitigation,Passive,N,Passive,Major debris,"Major debris transects that were generally devoid of eelgrass and the estero floor beneath the rack was primarily (generally > 50%) covered with oyster culture debris (plastic tubes, shell, live oysters, wire, and epiphytes on the debris).",Y,"They used control plots and only took photos, they didn't do shoot counts--everything is % cover",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Table 6 in 2019 report states that controls had a -1% change in % cover from Year 1 to 3, but otherwise ""controls"" are the standard and cover averages ~80%",2016-2017,August-May,Spring,3,"Pre, post, year 1 (4-6 mo post), year 2, year 3",12,1.2,ND,NA,ND,ND,NA,424,ND,NA,ND,ND,1,NA,Yes; meeting 1.2:1 mitigation ratio of impacted habitat,Y,ND,"Initial area restored was calculated using teh 2016-2017 report that stated the footprint of the restoration was 5 miles long and ~3.6 m wide. Mitigation requirement met (11,376sf or 249% recovery relative to required mitigation area of 4,564 sf), but coverage did not reach coverage levels seen in the reference meadow. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,N,NA,Y,In progress,Y,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Drakes_DebrisRemoval,Drakes_DebrisRemoval_Wood,Drakes_DebrisRemoval_2016_lowdebris_12mo,Grey literature,National Parks Service,Drakes Bay,Drakes Bay,38.05,-122.94,N. Cal,Didemnum vexillum (invasive tunicate),N,Mitigation,Passive,N,Passive,Low debris,"Rack transects that were under oyster racks within eelgrass beds, but were generally devoid of eelgrass directly beneath the racks. Since these racks did not have extensive bottom debris, these were good candidates for eelgrass regrowth.",Y,"They used control plots and only took photos, they didn't do shoot counts--everything is % cover",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Table 6 in 2019 report states that controls had a -1% change in % cover from Year 1 to 3, but otherwise ""controls"" are the standard and cover averages ~80%",2016-2017,August-May,Spring,3,"Pre, post, year 1 (4-6 mo post), year 2, year 4",12,1.2,ND, ,ND,ND,NA,424,ND,NA,ND,ND,23,NA,Yes; meeting 1.2:1 mitigation ratio of impacted habitat,Y,ND,"Initial area restored was calculated using teh 2016-2017 report that stated the footprint of the restoration was 5 miles long and ~3.6 m wide. Mitigation requirement met (11,376sf or 249% recovery relative to required mitigation area of 4,564 sf), but coverage did not reach coverage levels seen in the reference emadow. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,N,NA,Y,In progress,Y,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Drakes_DebrisRemoval,Drakes_DebrisRemoval_Major,Drakes_DebrisRemoval_2016_wooddebris_12mo,Grey literature,National Parks Service,Drakes Bay,Drakes Bay,38.05,-122.94,N. Cal,Didemnum vexillum (invasive tunicate),N,Mitigation,Passive,N,Passive,Wood debris,"Stringer transects where the rack generally had eelgrass beneath the rack, but large amounts of wooden racks had fallen into the eelgrass. These plots could have suffered damage during the wood and debris removal process.",Y,"They used control plots and only took photos, they didn't do shoot counts--everything is % cover",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Table 6 in 2019 report states that controls had a -1% change in % cover from Year 1 to 3, but otherwise ""controls"" are the standard and cover averages ~80%",2016-2017,August-May,Spring,3,"Pre, post, year 1 (4-6 mo post), year 2, year 5",12,1.2,ND,NA,ND,ND,NA,424,ND,NA,ND,ND,46,NA,Yes; meeting 1.2:1 mitigation ratio of impacted habitat,Y,ND,"Initial area restored was calculated using teh 2016-2017 report that stated the footprint of the restoration was 5 miles long and ~3.6 m wide. Mitigation requirement met (11,376sf or 249% recovery relative to required mitigation area of 4,564 sf), but coverage did not reach coverage levels seen in the reference emadow. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,N,NA,Y,In progress,Y,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Drakes_DebrisRemoval,Drakes_DebrisRemoval_Low,Drakes_DebrisRemoval_2016_majordebris_24mo,Grey literature,National Parks Service,Drakes Bay,Drakes Bay,38.05,-122.94,N. Cal,Didemnum vexillum (invasive tunicate),N,Mitigation,Passive,N,Passive,Major debris,"Major debris transects that were generally devoid of eelgrass and the estero floor beneath the rack was primarily (generally > 50%) covered with oyster culture debris (plastic tubes, shell, live oysters, wire, and epiphytes on the debris).",Y,"They used control plots and only took photos, they didn't do shoot counts--everything is % cover",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Table 6 in 2019 report states that controls had a -1% change in % cover from Year 1 to 3, but otherwise ""controls"" are the standard and cover averages ~80%",2016-2017,August-May,Spring,3,"Pre, post, year 1 (4-6 mo post), year 2, year 3",24,1.2,ND,NA,ND,ND,NA,424,ND,NA,ND,ND,6,NA,Yes; meeting 1.2:1 mitigation ratio of impacted habitat,Y,ND,"Initial area restored was calculated using teh 2016-2017 report that stated the footprint of the restoration was 5 miles long and ~3.6 m wide. Mitigation requirement met (11,376sf or 249% recovery relative to required mitigation area of 4,564 sf), but coverage did not reach coverage levels seen in the reference emadow. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,N,NA,Y,In progress,Y,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Drakes_DebrisRemoval,Drakes_DebrisRemoval_Wood,Drakes_DebrisRemoval_2016_lowdebris_24mo,Grey literature,National Parks Service,Drakes Bay,Drakes Bay,38.05,-122.94,N. Cal,Didemnum vexillum (invasive tunicate),N,Mitigation,Passive,N,Passive,Low debris,"Rack transects that were under oyster racks within eelgrass beds, but were generally devoid of eelgrass directly beneath the racks. Since these racks did not have extensive bottom debris, these were good candidates for eelgrass regrowth.",Y,"They used control plots and only took photos, they didn't do shoot counts--everything is % cover",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Table 6 in 2019 report states that controls had a -1% change in % cover from Year 1 to 3, but otherwise ""controls"" are the standard and cover averages ~80%",2016-2017,August-May,Spring,3,"Pre, post, year 1 (4-6 mo post), year 2, year 4",24,1.2,ND,NA,ND,ND,NA,424,ND,NA,ND,ND,62,NA,Yes; meeting 1.2:1 mitigation ratio of impacted habitat,Y,ND,"Initial area restored was calculated using teh 2016-2017 report that stated the footprint of the restoration was 5 miles long and ~3.6 m wide. Mitigation requirement met (11,376sf or 249% recovery relative to required mitigation area of 4,564 sf), but coverage did not reach coverage levels seen in the reference emadow. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,N,NA,Y,In progress,Y,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Drakes_DebrisRemoval,Drakes_DebrisRemoval_Major,Drakes_DebrisRemoval_2016_wooddebris_24mo,Grey literature,National Parks Service,Drakes Bay,Drakes Bay,38.05,-122.94,N. Cal,Didemnum vexillum (invasive tunicate),N,Mitigation,Passive,N,Passive,Wood debris,"Stringer transects where the rack generally had eelgrass beneath the rack, but large amounts of wooden racks had fallen into the eelgrass. These plots could have suffered damage during the wood and debris removal process.",Y,"They used control plots and only took photos, they didn't do shoot counts--everything is % cover",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Table 6 in 2019 report states that controls had a -1% change in % cover from Year 1 to 3, but otherwise ""controls"" are the standard and cover averages ~80%",2016-2017,August-May,Spring,3,"Pre, post, year 1 (4-6 mo post), year 2, year 5",24,1.2,ND,NA,ND,ND,NA,424,ND,NA,ND,ND,53,NA,Yes; meeting 1.2:1 mitigation ratio of impacted habitat,Y,ND,"Initial area restored was calculated using teh 2016-2017 report that stated the footprint of the restoration was 5 miles long and ~3.6 m wide. Mitigation requirement met (11,376sf or 249% recovery relative to required mitigation area of 4,564 sf), but coverage did not reach coverage levels seen in the reference emadow. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,N,NA,Y,In progress,Y,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Drakes_DebrisRemoval,Drakes_DebrisRemoval_Low,Drakes_DebrisRemoval_2016_majordebris_36mo,Grey literature,National Parks Service,Drakes Bay,Drakes Bay,38.05,-122.94,N. Cal,Didemnum vexillum (invasive tunicate),N,Mitigation,Passive,N,Passive,Major debris,"Major debris transects that were generally devoid of eelgrass and the estero floor beneath the rack was primarily (generally > 50%) covered with oyster culture debris (plastic tubes, shell, live oysters, wire, and epiphytes on the debris).",Y,"They used control plots and only took photos, they didn't do shoot counts--everything is % cover",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Table 6 in 2019 report states that controls had a -1% change in % cover from Year 1 to 3, but otherwise ""controls"" are the standard and cover averages ~80%",2016-2017,August-May,Spring,3,"Pre, post, year 1 (4-6 mo post), year 2, year 3",36,1.2,ND,NA,ND,ND,NA,424,1057,NA,ND,ND,7,NA,Yes; meeting 1.2:1 mitigation ratio of impacted habitat,Y,ND,"Initial area restored was calculated using teh 2016-2017 report that stated the footprint of the restoration was 5 miles long and ~3.6 m wide. Mitigation requirement met (11,376sf or 249% recovery relative to required mitigation area of 4,564 sf), but coverage did not reach coverage levels seen in the reference emadow. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,N,NA,Y,In progress,Y,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Drakes_DebrisRemoval,Drakes_DebrisRemoval_Wood,Drakes_DebrisRemoval_2016_lowdebris_36mo,Grey literature,National Parks Service,Drakes Bay,Drakes Bay,38.05,-122.94,N. Cal,Didemnum vexillum (invasive tunicate),N,Mitigation,Passive,N,Passive,Low debris,"Rack transects that were under oyster racks within eelgrass beds, but were generally devoid of eelgrass directly beneath the racks. Since these racks did not have extensive bottom debris, these were good candidates for eelgrass regrowth.",Y,"They used control plots and only took photos, they didn't do shoot counts--everything is % cover",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Table 6 in 2019 report states that controls had a -1% change in % cover from Year 1 to 3, but otherwise ""controls"" are the standard and cover averages ~80%",2016-2017,August-May,Spring,3,"Pre, post, year 1 (4-6 mo post), year 2, year 4",36,1.2,ND,NA,ND,ND,NA,424,1057,NA,ND,ND,53,NA,Yes; meeting 1.2:1 mitigation ratio of impacted habitat,Y,ND,"Initial area restored was calculated using teh 2016-2017 report that stated the footprint of the restoration was 5 miles long and ~3.6 m wide. Mitigation requirement met (11,376sf or 249% recovery relative to required mitigation area of 4,564 sf), but coverage did not reach coverage levels seen in the reference emadow. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,N,NA,Y,In progress,Y,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Drakes_DebrisRemoval,Drakes_DebrisRemoval_Major,Drakes_DebrisRemoval_2016_wooddebris_36mo,Grey literature,National Parks Service,Drakes Bay,Drakes Bay,38.05,-122.94,N. Cal,Didemnum vexillum (invasive tunicate),N,Mitigation,Passive,N,Passive,Wood debris,"Stringer transects where the rack generally had eelgrass beneath the rack, but large amounts of wooden racks had fallen into the eelgrass. These plots could have suffered damage during the wood and debris removal process.",Y,"They used control plots and only took photos, they didn't do shoot counts--everything is % cover",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Table 6 in 2019 report states that controls had a -1% change in % cover from Year 1 to 3, but otherwise ""controls"" are the standard and cover averages ~80%",2016-2017,August-May,Spring,3,"Pre, post, year 1 (4-6 mo post), year 2, year 5",36,1.2,ND,NA,ND,ND,NA,424,1057,NA,ND,ND,72,NA,Yes; meeting 1.2:1 mitigation ratio of impacted habitat,Y,ND,"Initial area restored was calculated using teh 2016-2017 report that stated the footprint of the restoration was 5 miles long and ~3.6 m wide. Mitigation requirement met (11,376sf or 249% recovery relative to required mitigation area of 4,564 sf), but coverage did not reach coverage levels seen in the reference emadow. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,N,NA,Y,In progress,Y,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
ElkSlu_1_2015_Restoration_Project,ElkhornSlough_2015_Plot_A,ElkhornSlough_2015_Plot_A_1 mo,Peer-review,"UCSC, ESNERR",Elkhorn Slough,Elkhorn Slough-A-Vierras,36.81,-121.78,C. Cal,"Sea otters, Green crab",N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,Anchored with galvanized stakes,NA,Y,Recovering/Expanding,1300,1300,80,ND,80,ND,NA,NA,"Expanding, have been thriving since 1980s, beds are moving farther up and patches are popping up in tidal creeks",2015,May,Spring,3,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12",1,NA,-3.3,0 - 2m MLLW,36.810112,-121.78271,1020,0.25,1.25,80,43,40.3838723,ND,NA,Plots persisting and expanding through time and gradually begining to funciton similarly to reference meadows,Y,Y,"Since the other projects don't have these other metrics (internodal distances, shoot blade width) I am not including them in here for times sake, if we decide we want them I can transfer them",N,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,N,"CDMO Database for NERRs, Kat's YSI deployments",Y,Y,"Sea otters, halibut, rockfish, dungeness, rock crab, pipefish","Dungeness, Halibut, Dungeness, Red Rock Crab","Yes, trap data from deployed shrimp pots and minnow traps",N,Y,Y,ND,ND
ElkSlu_1_2015_Restoration_Project,ElkhornSlough_2015_Plot_A,ElkhornSlough_2015_Plot_A_15 mo,Peer-review,"UCSC, ESNERR",Elkhorn Slough,Elkhorn Slough-D-BtwRubisEandW,36.81,-121.78,C. Cal,"Sea otters, Green crab",N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,Anchored with galvanized stakes,NA,Y,Recovering/Expanding,ND,ND,80,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Expanding, have been thriving since 1980s, beds are moving farther up and patches are popping up in tidal creeks",2015,May,Spring,3,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12",15,NA,-3.3,0 - 2m MLLW,36.810112,-121.78271,1020,0.25,7.16,80,126,33.3866241,ND,NA,Plots persisting and expanding through time and gradually begining to funciton similarly to reference meadows,Y,Y,"Since the other projects don't have these other metrics (internodal distances, shoot blade width) I am not including them in here for times sake, if we decide we want them I can transfer them",N,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,N,"CDMO Database for NERRs, Kat's YSI deployments",Y,Y,"Sea otters, halibut, rockfish, dungeness, rock crab, pipefish","Dungeness, Halibut, Dungeness, Red Rock Crab","Yes, trap data from deployed shrimp pots and minnow traps",N,Y,Y,ND,ND
ElkSlu_2_2016_Restoration_Project,ElkhornSlough_2016_Plot_A,ElkhornSlough_2016_Plot_A_18 mo,Peer-review,"UCSC, ESNERR",Elkhorn Slough,Elkhorn Slough-B-CropCircles,36.81,-121.78,C. Cal,"Sea otters, Green crab",N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,Anchored with galvanized stakes,NA,Y,Recovering/Expanding,ND,ND,80,ND,55.3,27.5,NA,NA,"Expanding, have been thriving since 1980s, beds are moving farther up and patches are popping up in tidal creeks",2016,March,Winter,2,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12",18,NA,-3.3,0 - 2m MLLW,36.810112,-121.78271,1320,0.25,56.26,80,93.1428571,32.4726992,ND,NA,Plots persisting and expanding through time and gradually begining to funciton similarly to reference meadows,Y,Y,"Since the other projects don't have these other metrics (internodal distances, shoot blade width) I am not including them in here for times sake, if we decide we want them I can transfer them",N,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,N,"CDMO Database for NERRs, Kat's YSI deployments",Y,Y,"Sea otters, halibut, rockfish, dungeness, rock crab, pipefish","Dungeness, Halibut, Dungeness, Red Rock Crab","Yes, trap data from deployed shrimp pots and minnow traps",N,Y,Y,ND,ND
ElkSlu_1_2015_Restoration_Project,ElkhornSlough_2015_Plot_A,ElkhornSlough_2015_Plot_A_27 mo,Peer-review,"UCSC, ESNERR",Elkhorn Slough,Elkhorn Slough-A-Vierras,36.81,-121.78,C. Cal,"Sea otters, Green crab",N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,Anchored with galvanized stakes,NA,Y,Recovering/Expanding,ND,ND,80,ND,55.3,27.5,NA,NA,"Expanding, have been thriving since 1980s, beds are moving farther up and patches are popping up in tidal creeks",2015,May,Spring,3,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12",27,NA,-3.3,0 - 2m MLLW,36.810112,-121.78271,1020,0.25,35.65,80,101,19.9666388,ND,NA,Plots persisting and expanding through time and gradually begining to funciton similarly to reference meadows,Y,Y,"Since the other projects don't have these other metrics (internodal distances, shoot blade width) I am not including them in here for times sake, if we decide we want them I can transfer them",N,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,N,"CDMO Database for NERRs, Kat's YSI deployments",Y,Y,"Sea otters, halibut, rockfish, dungeness, rock crab, pipefish","Dungeness, Halibut, Dungeness, Red Rock Crab","Yes, trap data from deployed shrimp pots and minnow traps",N,Y,Y,ND,ND
ElkSlu_1_2015_Restoration_Project,ElkhornSlough_2015_Plot_A,ElkhornSlough_2015_Plot_A_3 mo,Peer-review,"UCSC, ESNERR",Elkhorn Slough,Elkhorn Slough-B-CropCircles,36.81,-121.78,C. Cal,"Sea otters, Green crab",N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,Anchored with galvanized stakes,NA,Y,Recovering/Expanding,ND,ND,80,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Expanding, have been thriving since 1980s, beds are moving farther up and patches are popping up in tidal creeks",2015,May,Spring,3,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12",3,NA,-3.3,0 - 2m MLLW,36.810112,-121.78271,1020,0.25,1.8,80,63.5,64.9725217,ND,NA,Plots persisting and expanding through time and gradually begining to funciton similarly to reference meadows,Y,Y,"Since the other projects don't have these other metrics (internodal distances, shoot blade width) I am not including them in here for times sake, if we decide we want them I can transfer them",N,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,N,"CDMO Database for NERRs, Kat's YSI deployments",Y,Y,"Sea otters, halibut, rockfish, dungeness, rock crab, pipefish","Dungeness, Halibut, Dungeness, Red Rock Crab","Yes, trap data from deployed shrimp pots and minnow traps",N,Y,Y,ND,ND
ElkSlu_2_2016_Restoration_Project,ElkhornSlough_2016_Plot_A,ElkhornSlough_2016_Plot_A_3 mo,Peer-review,"UCSC, ESNERR",Elkhorn Slough,Elkhorn Slough-D-BtwRubisEandW,36.81,-121.78,C. Cal,"Sea otters, Green crab",N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,Anchored with galvanized stakes,NA,Y,Recovering/Expanding,ND,ND,80,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Expanding, have been thriving since 1980s, beds are moving farther up and patches are popping up in tidal creeks",2016,March,Winter,2,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12",3,NA,-3.3,0 - 2m MLLW,36.810112,-121.78271,1320,0.25,1.25,80,80,11.3137085,ND,NA,Plots persisting and expanding through time and gradually begining to funciton similarly to reference meadows,Y,Y,"Since the other projects don't have these other metrics (internodal distances, shoot blade width) I am not including them in here for times sake, if we decide we want them I can transfer them",N,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,N,"CDMO Database for NERRs, Kat's YSI deployments",Y,Y,"Sea otters, halibut, rockfish, dungeness, rock crab, pipefish","Dungeness, Halibut, Dungeness, Red Rock Crab","Yes, trap data from deployed shrimp pots and minnow traps",N,Y,Y,ND,ND
ElkSlu_2_2016_Restoration_Project,ElkhornSlough_2016_Plot_A,ElkhornSlough_2016_Plot_A_30 mo,Peer-review,"UCSC, ESNERR",Elkhorn Slough,Elkhorn Slough-D-BtwRubisEandW,36.81,-121.78,C. Cal,"Sea otters, Green crab",N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,Anchored with galvanized stakes,NA,Y,Recovering/Expanding,1300,2000,80,ND,132.8,42.6,NA,NA,"Expanding, have been thriving since 1980s, beds are moving farther up and patches are popping up in tidal creeks",2016,March,Winter,2,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12",30,NA,-3.3,0 - 2m MLLW,36.810112,-121.78271,1320,0.25,164.95,80,105.333333,97.1184843,ND,NA,Plots persisting and expanding through time and gradually begining to funciton similarly to reference meadows,Y,Y,"Since the other projects don't have these other metrics (internodal distances, shoot blade width) I am not including them in here for times sake, if we decide we want them I can transfer them",N,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,N,"CDMO Database for NERRs, Kat's YSI deployments",Y,Y,"Sea otters, halibut, rockfish, dungeness, rock crab, pipefish","Dungeness, Halibut, Dungeness, Red Rock Crab","Yes, trap data from deployed shrimp pots and minnow traps",N,Y,Y,ND,ND
ElkSlu_1_2015_Restoration_Project,ElkhornSlough_2015_Plot_A,ElkhornSlough_2015_Plot_A_39 mo,Peer-review,"UCSC, ESNERR",Elkhorn Slough,Elkhorn Slough-B-CropCircles,36.81,-121.78,C. Cal,"Sea otters, Green crab",N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,Anchored with galvanized stakes,NA,Y,Recovering/Expanding,1300,2000,80,ND,132.8,42.6,NA,NA,"Expanding, have been thriving since 1980s, beds are moving farther up and patches are popping up in tidal creeks",2015,May,Spring,3,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12",39,NA,-3.3,0 - 2m MLLW,36.810112,-121.78271,1020,0.25,346.65,80,74.8571429,54.5387586,ND,NA,Plots persisting and expanding through time and gradually begining to funciton similarly to reference meadows,Y,Y,"Since the other projects don't have these other metrics (internodal distances, shoot blade width) I am not including them in here for times sake, if we decide we want them I can transfer them",N,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,N,"CDMO Database for NERRs, Kat's YSI deployments",Y,Y,"Sea otters, halibut, rockfish, dungeness, rock crab, pipefish","Dungeness, Halibut, Dungeness, Red Rock Crab","Yes, trap data from deployed shrimp pots and minnow traps",N,Y,Y,ND,ND
ElkSlu_1_2015_Restoration_Project,ElkhornSlough_2015_Plot_A,ElkhornSlough_2015_Plot_A_6 mo,Peer-review,"UCSC, ESNERR",Elkhorn Slough,Elkhorn Slough-C-Seal Bend,36.81,-121.78,C. Cal,"Sea otters, Green crab",N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,Anchored with galvanized stakes,NA,Y,Recovering/Expanding,ND,ND,80,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Expanding, have been thriving since 1980s, beds are moving farther up and patches are popping up in tidal creeks",2015,May,Spring,3,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12",6,NA,-3.3,0 - 2m MLLW,36.810112,-121.78271,1020,0.25,9.85,80,69.5,64.8845128,ND,NA,Plots persisting and expanding through time and gradually begining to funciton similarly to reference meadows,Y,Y,"Since the other projects don't have these other metrics (internodal distances, shoot blade width) I am not including them in here for times sake, if we decide we want them I can transfer them",N,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,N,"CDMO Database for NERRs, Kat's YSI deployments",Y,Y,"Sea otters, halibut, rockfish, dungeness, rock crab, pipefish","Dungeness, Halibut, Dungeness, Red Rock Crab","Yes, trap data from deployed shrimp pots and minnow traps",N,Y,Y,ND,ND
ElkSlu_2_2016_Restoration_Project,ElkhornSlough_2016_Plot_A,ElkhornSlough_2016_Plot_A_6 mo,Peer-review,"UCSC, ESNERR",Elkhorn Slough,Elkhorn Slough-E-BtwRubisEandW_South,36.81,-121.78,C. Cal,"Sea otters, Green crab",N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,Anchored with galvanized stakes,NA,Y,Recovering/Expanding,ND,ND,80,ND,128,44.5,NA,NA,"Expanding, have been thriving since 1980s, beds are moving farther up and patches are popping up in tidal creeks",2016,March,Winter,2,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12",6,NA,-3.3,0 - 2m MLLW,36.810112,-121.78271,1320,0.25,5.08,80,83.5,61.6881558,ND,NA,Plots persisting and expanding through time and gradually begining to funciton similarly to reference meadows,Y,Y,"Since the other projects don't have these other metrics (internodal distances, shoot blade width) I am not including them in here for times sake, if we decide we want them I can transfer them",N,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,N,"CDMO Database for NERRs, Kat's YSI deployments",Y,Y,"Sea otters, halibut, rockfish, dungeness, rock crab, pipefish","Dungeness, Halibut, Dungeness, Red Rock Crab","Yes, trap data from deployed shrimp pots and minnow traps",N,Y,Y,ND,ND
ElkSlu_1_2015_Restoration_Project,ElkhornSlough_2015_Plot_B,ElkhornSlough_2015_Plot_B_1 mo,Peer-review,"UCSC, ESNERR",Elkhorn Slough,Elkhorn Slough-A-Vierras,36.81,-121.78,C. Cal,"Sea otters, Green crab",N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,Anchored with galvanized stakes,NA,Y,Recovering/Expanding,10000,10000,80,ND,80,ND,NA,NA,"Expanding, have been thriving since 1980s, beds are moving farther up and patches are popping up in tidal creeks",2015,May,Spring,3,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12",1,NA,-3.3,0 - 2m MLLW,36.811888,-121.77369,1020,0.25,1.5,80,21.2,28.6620151,ND,NA,Plots persisting and expanding through time and gradually begining to funciton similarly to reference meadows,Y,Y,"Since the other projects don't have these other metrics (internodal distances, shoot blade width) I am not including them in here for times sake, if we decide we want them I can transfer them",N,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,N,"CDMO Database for NERRs, Kat's YSI deployments",Y,Y,"Sea otters, halibut, rockfish, dungeness, rock crab, pipefish","Dungeness, Halibut, Dungeness, Red Rock Crab","Yes, trap data from deployed shrimp pots and minnow traps",N,Y,Y,ND,ND
ElkSlu_1_2015_Restoration_Project,ElkhornSlough_2015_Plot_B,ElkhornSlough_2015_Plot_B_15 mo,Peer-review,"UCSC, ESNERR",Elkhorn Slough,Elkhorn Slough-D-BtwRubisEandW,36.81,-121.78,C. Cal,"Sea otters, Green crab",N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,Anchored with galvanized stakes,NA,Y,Recovering/Expanding,ND,ND,80,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Expanding, have been thriving since 1980s, beds are moving farther up and patches are popping up in tidal creeks",2015,May,Spring,3,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12",15,NA,-3.3,0 - 2m MLLW,36.811888,-121.77369,1020,0.25,15.93,80,210,2.82842712,ND,NA,Plots persisting and expanding through time and gradually begining to funciton similarly to reference meadows,Y,Y,"Since the other projects don't have these other metrics (internodal distances, shoot blade width) I am not including them in here for times sake, if we decide we want them I can transfer them",N,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,N,"CDMO Database for NERRs, Kat's YSI deployments",Y,Y,"Sea otters, halibut, rockfish, dungeness, rock crab, pipefish","Dungeness, Halibut, Dungeness, Red Rock Crab","Yes, trap data from deployed shrimp pots and minnow traps",N,Y,Y,ND,ND
ElkSlu_2_2016_Restoration_Project,ElkhornSlough_2016_Plot_B,ElkhornSlough_2016_Plot_B_18 mo,Peer-review,"UCSC, ESNERR",Elkhorn Slough,Elkhorn Slough-C-Seal Bend,36.81,-121.78,C. Cal,"Sea otters, Green crab",N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,Anchored with galvanized stakes,NA,Y,Recovering/Expanding,ND,ND,80,ND,92.7,21.1,NA,NA,"Expanding, have been thriving since 1980s, beds are moving farther up and patches are popping up in tidal creeks",2016,March,Winter,2,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12",18,NA,-3.3,0 - 2m MLLW,36.811888,-121.77369,1320,0.25,35.43,80,105.714286,24.2054697,ND,NA,Plots persisting and expanding through time and gradually begining to funciton similarly to reference meadows,Y,Y,"Since the other projects don't have these other metrics (internodal distances, shoot blade width) I am not including them in here for times sake, if we decide we want them I can transfer them",N,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,N,"CDMO Database for NERRs, Kat's YSI deployments",Y,Y,"Sea otters, halibut, rockfish, dungeness, rock crab, pipefish","Dungeness, Halibut, Dungeness, Red Rock Crab","Yes, trap data from deployed shrimp pots and minnow traps",N,Y,Y,ND,ND
ElkSlu_1_2015_Restoration_Project,ElkhornSlough_2015_Plot_B,ElkhornSlough_2015_Plot_B_27 mo,Peer-review,"UCSC, ESNERR",Elkhorn Slough,Elkhorn Slough-B-CropCircles,36.81,-121.78,C. Cal,"Sea otters, Green crab",N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,Anchored with galvanized stakes,NA,Y,Recovering/Expanding,ND,ND,80,ND,92.7,21.1,NA,NA,"Expanding, have been thriving since 1980s, beds are moving farther up and patches are popping up in tidal creeks",2015,May,Spring,3,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12",27,NA,-3.3,0 - 2m MLLW,36.811888,-121.77369,1020,0.25,31.49,80,84,14.4222051,ND,NA,Plots persisting and expanding through time and gradually begining to funciton similarly to reference meadows,Y,Y,"Since the other projects don't have these other metrics (internodal distances, shoot blade width) I am not including them in here for times sake, if we decide we want them I can transfer them",N,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,N,"CDMO Database for NERRs, Kat's YSI deployments",Y,Y,"Sea otters, halibut, rockfish, dungeness, rock crab, pipefish","Dungeness, Halibut, Dungeness, Red Rock Crab","Yes, trap data from deployed shrimp pots and minnow traps",N,Y,Y,ND,ND
ElkSlu_1_2015_Restoration_Project,ElkhornSlough_2015_Plot_B,ElkhornSlough_2015_Plot_B_3 mo,Peer-review,"UCSC, ESNERR",Elkhorn Slough,Elkhorn Slough-B-CropCircles,36.81,-121.78,C. Cal,"Sea otters, Green crab",N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,Anchored with galvanized stakes,NA,Y,Recovering/Expanding,ND,ND,80,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Expanding, have been thriving since 1980s, beds are moving farther up and patches are popping up in tidal creeks",2015,May,Spring,3,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12",3,NA,-3.3,0 - 2m MLLW,36.811888,-121.77369,1020,0.25,0.75,80,13.2,22.5526544,ND,NA,Plots persisting and expanding through time and gradually begining to funciton similarly to reference meadows,Y,Y,"Since the other projects don't have these other metrics (internodal distances, shoot blade width) I am not including them in here for times sake, if we decide we want them I can transfer them",N,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,N,"CDMO Database for NERRs, Kat's YSI deployments",Y,Y,"Sea otters, halibut, rockfish, dungeness, rock crab, pipefish","Dungeness, Halibut, Dungeness, Red Rock Crab","Yes, trap data from deployed shrimp pots and minnow traps",N,Y,Y,ND,ND
ElkSlu_2_2016_Restoration_Project,ElkhornSlough_2016_Plot_B,ElkhornSlough_2016_Plot_B_30 mo,Peer-review,"UCSC, ESNERR",Elkhorn Slough,Elkhorn Slough-B-CropCircles,36.81,-121.78,C. Cal,"Sea otters, Green crab",N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,Anchored with galvanized stakes,NA,Y,Recovering/Expanding,10000,11000,80,ND,150.4,27.8,NA,NA,"Expanding, have been thriving since 1980s, beds are moving farther up and patches are popping up in tidal creeks",2016,March,Winter,2,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 14",30,NA,-3.3,0 - 2m MLLW,36.811888,-121.77369,1320,0.25,289.74,80,158.909091,83.6390513,ND,NA,Plots persisting and expanding through time and gradually begining to funciton similarly to reference meadows,Y,Y,"Since the other projects don't have these other metrics (internodal distances, shoot blade width) I am not including them in here for times sake, if we decide we want them I can transfer them",N,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,N,"CDMO Database for NERRs, Kat's YSI deployments",Y,Y,"Sea otters, halibut, rockfish, dungeness, rock crab, pipefish","Dungeness, Halibut, Dungeness, Red Rock Crab","Yes, trap data from deployed shrimp pots and minnow traps",N,Y,Y,ND,ND
ElkSlu_1_2015_Restoration_Project,ElkhornSlough_2015_Plot_B,ElkhornSlough_2015_Plot_B_39 mo,Peer-review,"UCSC, ESNERR",Elkhorn Slough,Elkhorn Slough-D-BtwRubisEandW,36.81,-121.78,C. Cal,"Sea otters, Green crab",N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,Anchored with galvanized stakes,NA,Y,Recovering/Expanding,10000,11000,80,ND,150.4,27.8,NA,NA,"Expanding, have been thriving since 1980s, beds are moving farther up and patches are popping up in tidal creeks",2015,May,Spring,3,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12",39,NA,-3.3,0 - 2m MLLW,36.811888,-121.77369,1020,0.25,518.26,80,147.272727,79.9363383,ND,NA,Plots persisting and expanding through time and gradually begining to funciton similarly to reference meadows,Y,Y,"Since the other projects don't have these other metrics (internodal distances, shoot blade width) I am not including them in here for times sake, if we decide we want them I can transfer them",N,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,N,"CDMO Database for NERRs, Kat's YSI deployments",Y,Y,"Sea otters, halibut, rockfish, dungeness, rock crab, pipefish","Dungeness, Halibut, Dungeness, Red Rock Crab","Yes, trap data from deployed shrimp pots and minnow traps",N,Y,Y,ND,ND
ElkSlu_1_2015_Restoration_Project,ElkhornSlough_2015_Plot_B,ElkhornSlough_2015_Plot_B_6 mo,Peer-review,"UCSC, ESNERR",Elkhorn Slough,Elkhorn Slough-C-Seal Bend,36.81,-121.78,C. Cal,"Sea otters, Green crab",N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,Anchored with galvanized stakes,NA,Y,Recovering/Expanding,ND,ND,80,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Expanding, have been thriving since 1980s, beds are moving farther up and patches are popping up in tidal creeks",2015,May,Spring,3,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12",6,NA,-3.3,0 - 2m MLLW,36.811888,-121.77369,1020,0.25,2.94,80,12,25.2982213,ND,NA,Plots persisting and expanding through time and gradually begining to funciton similarly to reference meadows,Y,Y,"Since the other projects don't have these other metrics (internodal distances, shoot blade width) I am not including them in here for times sake, if we decide we want them I can transfer them",N,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,N,"CDMO Database for NERRs, Kat's YSI deployments",Y,Y,"Sea otters, halibut, rockfish, dungeness, rock crab, pipefish","Dungeness, Halibut, Dungeness, Red Rock Crab","Yes, trap data from deployed shrimp pots and minnow traps",N,Y,Y,ND,ND
ElkSlu_2_2016_Restoration_Project,ElkhornSlough_2016_Plot_B,ElkhornSlough_2016_Plot_B_6 mo,Peer-review,"UCSC, ESNERR",Elkhorn Slough,Elkhorn Slough-E-BtwRubisEandW_South,36.81,-121.78,C. Cal,"Sea otters, Green crab",N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,Anchored with galvanized stakes,NA,Y,Recovering/Expanding,ND,ND,80,ND,128,44.5,NA,NA,"Expanding, have been thriving since 1980s, beds are moving farther up and patches are popping up in tidal creeks",2016,March,Winter,2,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12",6,NA,-3.3,0 - 2m MLLW,36.811888,-121.77369,1320,0.25,1.3,80,43.3333333,61.6787376,ND,NA,Plots persisting and expanding through time and gradually begining to funciton similarly to reference meadows,Y,Y,"Since the other projects don't have these other metrics (internodal distances, shoot blade width) I am not including them in here for times sake, if we decide we want them I can transfer them",N,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,N,"CDMO Database for NERRs, Kat's YSI deployments",Y,Y,"Sea otters, halibut, rockfish, dungeness, rock crab, pipefish","Dungeness, Halibut, Dungeness, Red Rock Crab","Yes, trap data from deployed shrimp pots and minnow traps",N,Y,Y,ND,ND
ElkSlu_1_2015_Restoration_Project,ElkhornSlough_2015_Plot_C,ElkhornSlough_2015_Plot_C_1 mo,Peer-review,"UCSC, ESNERR",Elkhorn Slough,Elkhorn Slough-A-Vierras,36.81,-121.78,C. Cal,"Sea otters, Green crab",N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,Anchored with galvanized stakes,NA,Y,Recovering/Expanding,61000,61000,80,ND,80,ND,NA,NA,"Expanding, have been thriving since 1980s, beds are moving farther up and patches are popping up in tidal creeks",2015,May,Spring,3,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 13",1,NA,-3.3,0 - 2m MLLW,36.812332,-121.76343,1020,0.25,0.75,80,12,24.3310501,ND,NA,Plots persisting and expanding through time and gradually begining to funciton similarly to reference meadows,Y,Y,"Since the other projects don't have these other metrics (internodal distances, shoot blade width) I am not including them in here for times sake, if we decide we want them I can transfer them",N,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,N,"CDMO Database for NERRs, Kat's YSI deployments",Y,Y,"Sea otters, halibut, rockfish, dungeness, rock crab, pipefish","Dungeness, Halibut, Dungeness, Red Rock Crab","Yes, trap data from deployed shrimp pots and minnow traps",Y,Y,Y,ND,ND
ElkSlu_1_2015_Restoration_Project,ElkhornSlough_2015_Plot_C,ElkhornSlough_2015_Plot_C_15 mo,Peer-review,"UCSC, ESNERR",Elkhorn Slough,Elkhorn Slough-D-BtwRubisEandW,36.81,-121.78,C. Cal,"Sea otters, Green crab",N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,Anchored with galvanized stakes,NA,Y,Recovering/Expanding,ND,ND,80,ND,131,13.2,NA,NA,"Expanding, have been thriving since 1980s, beds are moving farther up and patches are popping up in tidal creeks",2015,May,Spring,3,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12",15,NA,-3.3,0 - 2m MLLW,36.812332,-121.76343,1020,0.25,8.18,80,176,45.254834,ND,NA,Plots persisting and expanding through time and gradually begining to funciton similarly to reference meadows,Y,Y,"Since the other projects don't have these other metrics (internodal distances, shoot blade width) I am not including them in here for times sake, if we decide we want them I can transfer them",N,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,N,"CDMO Database for NERRs, Kat's YSI deployments",Y,Y,"Sea otters, halibut, rockfish, dungeness, rock crab, pipefish","Dungeness, Halibut, Dungeness, Red Rock Crab","Yes, trap data from deployed shrimp pots and minnow traps",Y,Y,Y,ND,ND
ElkSlu_2_2016_Restoration_Project,ElkhornSlough_2016_Plot_C,ElkhornSlough_2016_Plot_C_18 mo,Peer-review,"UCSC, ESNERR",Elkhorn Slough,Elkhorn Slough-C-Seal Bend,36.81,-121.78,C. Cal,"Sea otters, Green crab",N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,Anchored with galvanized stakes,NA,Y,Recovering/Expanding,ND,ND,80,ND,153.7,16.3,NA,NA,"Expanding, have been thriving since 1980s, beds are moving farther up and patches are popping up in tidal creeks",2016,March,Winter,2,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 13",18,NA,-3.3,0 - 2m MLLW,36.812332,-121.76343,1320,0.25,20.62,80,126,56.7097875,ND,NA,Plots persisting and expanding through time and gradually begining to funciton similarly to reference meadows,Y,Y,"Since the other projects don't have these other metrics (internodal distances, shoot blade width) I am not including them in here for times sake, if we decide we want them I can transfer them",N,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,N,"CDMO Database for NERRs, Kat's YSI deployments",Y,Y,"Sea otters, halibut, rockfish, dungeness, rock crab, pipefish","Dungeness, Halibut, Dungeness, Red Rock Crab","Yes, trap data from deployed shrimp pots and minnow traps",Y,Y,Y,ND,ND
ElkSlu_1_2015_Restoration_Project,ElkhornSlough_2015_Plot_C,ElkhornSlough_2015_Plot_C_27 mo,Peer-review,"UCSC, ESNERR",Elkhorn Slough,Elkhorn Slough-B-CropCircles,36.81,-121.78,C. Cal,"Sea otters, Green crab",N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,Anchored with galvanized stakes,NA,Y,Recovering/Expanding,ND,ND,80,ND,153.7,16.3,NA,NA,"Expanding, have been thriving since 1980s, beds are moving farther up and patches are popping up in tidal creeks",2015,May,Spring,3,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12",27,NA,-3.3,0 - 2m MLLW,36.812332,-121.76343,1020,0.25,16.04,80,132,11.3137085,ND,NA,Plots persisting and expanding through time and gradually begining to funciton similarly to reference meadows,Y,Y,"Since the other projects don't have these other metrics (internodal distances, shoot blade width) I am not including them in here for times sake, if we decide we want them I can transfer them",N,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,N,"CDMO Database for NERRs, Kat's YSI deployments",Y,Y,"Sea otters, halibut, rockfish, dungeness, rock crab, pipefish","Dungeness, Halibut, Dungeness, Red Rock Crab","Yes, trap data from deployed shrimp pots and minnow traps",Y,Y,Y,ND,ND
ElkSlu_1_2015_Restoration_Project,ElkhornSlough_2015_Plot_C,ElkhornSlough_2015_Plot_C_3 mo,Peer-review,"UCSC, ESNERR",Elkhorn Slough,Elkhorn Slough-B-CropCircles,36.81,-121.78,C. Cal,"Sea otters, Green crab",N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,Anchored with galvanized stakes,NA,Y,Recovering/Expanding,ND,ND,80,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Expanding, have been thriving since 1980s, beds are moving farther up and patches are popping up in tidal creeks",2015,May,Spring,3,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12",3,NA,-3.3,0 - 2m MLLW,36.812332,-121.76343,1020,0.25,0.5,80,19.5555556,38.8043526,ND,NA,Plots persisting and expanding through time and gradually begining to funciton similarly to reference meadows,Y,Y,"Since the other projects don't have these other metrics (internodal distances, shoot blade width) I am not including them in here for times sake, if we decide we want them I can transfer them",N,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,N,"CDMO Database for NERRs, Kat's YSI deployments",Y,Y,"Sea otters, halibut, rockfish, dungeness, rock crab, pipefish","Dungeness, Halibut, Dungeness, Red Rock Crab","Yes, trap data from deployed shrimp pots and minnow traps",Y,Y,Y,ND,ND
ElkSlu_2_2016_Restoration_Project,ElkhornSlough_2016_Plot_C,ElkhornSlough_2016_Plot_C_30 mo,Peer-review,"UCSC, ESNERR",Elkhorn Slough,Elkhorn Slough-E-BtwRubisEandW_South,36.81,-121.78,C. Cal,"Sea otters, Green crab",N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,Anchored with galvanized stakes,NA,Y,Recovering/Expanding,61000,65000,80,ND,163.2,28.2,NA,NA,"Expanding, have been thriving since 1980s, beds are moving farther up and patches are popping up in tidal creeks",2016,March,Winter,2,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 13",30,NA,-3.3,0 - 2m MLLW,36.812332,-121.76343,1320,0.25,46.61,80,143,31.2196519,ND,NA,Plots persisting and expanding through time and gradually begining to funciton similarly to reference meadows,Y,Y,"Since the other projects don't have these other metrics (internodal distances, shoot blade width) I am not including them in here for times sake, if we decide we want them I can transfer them",N,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,N,"CDMO Database for NERRs, Kat's YSI deployments",Y,Y,"Sea otters, halibut, rockfish, dungeness, rock crab, pipefish","Dungeness, Halibut, Dungeness, Red Rock Crab","Yes, trap data from deployed shrimp pots and minnow traps",Y,Y,Y,ND,ND
ElkSlu_1_2015_Restoration_Project,ElkhornSlough_2015_Plot_C,ElkhornSlough_2015_Plot_C_39 mo,Peer-review,"UCSC, ESNERR",Elkhorn Slough,Elkhorn Slough-D-BtwRubisEandW,36.81,-121.78,C. Cal,"Sea otters, Green crab",N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,Anchored with galvanized stakes,NA,Y,Recovering/Expanding,61000,65000,80,ND,163.2,28.2,NA,NA,"Expanding, have been thriving since 1980s, beds are moving farther up and patches are popping up in tidal creeks",2015,May,Spring,3,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 13",39,NA,-3.3,0 - 2m MLLW,36.812332,-121.76343,1020,0.25,74.99,80,81.3333333,71.8145761,ND,NA,Plots persisting and expanding through time and gradually begining to funciton similarly to reference meadows,Y,Y,"Since the other projects don't have these other metrics (internodal distances, shoot blade width) I am not including them in here for times sake, if we decide we want them I can transfer them",N,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,N,"CDMO Database for NERRs, Kat's YSI deployments",Y,Y,"Sea otters, halibut, rockfish, dungeness, rock crab, pipefish","Dungeness, Halibut, Dungeness, Red Rock Crab","Yes, trap data from deployed shrimp pots and minnow traps",Y,Y,Y,ND,ND
ElkSlu_1_2015_Restoration_Project,ElkhornSlough_2015_Plot_C,ElkhornSlough_2015_Plot_C_6 mo,Peer-review,"UCSC, ESNERR",Elkhorn Slough,Elkhorn Slough-C-Seal Bend,36.81,-121.78,C. Cal,"Sea otters, Green crab",N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,Anchored with galvanized stakes,NA,Y,Recovering/Expanding,ND,ND,80,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Expanding, have been thriving since 1980s, beds are moving farther up and patches are popping up in tidal creeks",2015,May,Spring,3,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12",6,NA,-3.3,0 - 2m MLLW,36.812332,-121.76343,1020,0.25,6.82,80,42.6666667,64.591021,ND,NA,Plots persisting and expanding through time and gradually begining to funciton similarly to reference meadows,Y,Y,"Since the other projects don't have these other metrics (internodal distances, shoot blade width) I am not including them in here for times sake, if we decide we want them I can transfer them",N,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,N,"CDMO Database for NERRs, Kat's YSI deployments",Y,Y,"Sea otters, halibut, rockfish, dungeness, rock crab, pipefish","Dungeness, Halibut, Dungeness, Red Rock Crab","Yes, trap data from deployed shrimp pots and minnow traps",Y,Y,Y,ND,ND
ElkSlu_2_2016_Restoration_Project,ElkhornSlough_2016_Plot_C,ElkhornSlough_2016_Plot_C_6 mo,Peer-review,"UCSC, ESNERR",Elkhorn Slough,Elkhorn Slough-E-BtwRubisEandW_South,36.81,-121.78,C. Cal,"Sea otters, Green crab",N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,Anchored with galvanized stakes,NA,Y,Recovering/Expanding,ND,ND,80,ND,131,13.2,NA,NA,"Expanding, have been thriving since 1980s, beds are moving farther up and patches are popping up in tidal creeks",2016,March,Winter,2,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 13",6,NA,-3.3,0 - 2m MLLW,36.812332,-121.76343,1320,0.25,3.39,80,97.3333333,96.3216833,ND,NA,Plots persisting and expanding through time and gradually begining to funciton similarly to reference meadows,Y,Y,"Since the other projects don't have these other metrics (internodal distances, shoot blade width) I am not including them in here for times sake, if we decide we want them I can transfer them",N,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,N,"CDMO Database for NERRs, Kat's YSI deployments",Y,Y,"Sea otters, halibut, rockfish, dungeness, rock crab, pipefish","Dungeness, Halibut, Dungeness, Red Rock Crab","Yes, trap data from deployed shrimp pots and minnow traps",Y,Y,Y,ND,ND
ElkSlu_1_2015_Restoration_Project,ElkhornSlough_2015_Plot_D,ElkhornSlough_2015_Plot_D_1 mo,Peer-review,"UCSC, ESNERR",Elkhorn Slough,Elkhorn Slough-A-Vierras,36.81,-121.78,C. Cal,"Sea otters, Green crab",N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,Anchored with galvanized stakes,NA,Y,Recovering/Expanding,NA,NA,80,ND,80,ND,NA,NA,"Expanding, have been thriving since 1980s, beds are moving farther up and patches are popping up in tidal creeks",2015,May,Spring,3,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 13",1,NA,-3.3,0 - 2m MLLW,36.813374,-121.75537,1020,0.25,3.25,80,57.8461538,18.008545,ND,NA,Plots persisting and expanding through time and gradually begining to funciton similarly to reference meadows,Y,Y,"Since the other projects don't have these other metrics (internodal distances, shoot blade width) I am not including them in here for times sake, if we decide we want them I can transfer them",N,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,N,"CDMO Database for NERRs, Kat's YSI deployments",Y,Y,"Sea otters, halibut, rockfish, dungeness, rock crab, pipefish","Dungeness, Halibut, Dungeness, Red Rock Crab","Yes, trap data from deployed shrimp pots and minnow traps",Y,Y,Y,ND,ND
ElkSlu_1_2015_Restoration_Project,ElkhornSlough_2015_Plot_D,ElkhornSlough_2015_Plot_D_15 mo,Peer-review,"UCSC, ESNERR",Elkhorn Slough,Elkhorn Slough-D-BtwRubisEandW,36.81,-121.78,C. Cal,"Sea otters, Green crab",N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,Anchored with galvanized stakes,NA,Y,Recovering/Expanding,NA,NA,80,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Expanding, have been thriving since 1980s, beds are moving farther up and patches are popping up in tidal creeks",2015,May,Spring,3,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 13",15,NA,-3.3,0 - 2m MLLW,36.813374,-121.75537,1020,0.25,22.91,80,106,48.3156289,ND,NA,Plots persisting and expanding through time and gradually begining to funciton similarly to reference meadows,Y,Y,"Since the other projects don't have these other metrics (internodal distances, shoot blade width) I am not including them in here for times sake, if we decide we want them I can transfer them",N,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,N,"CDMO Database for NERRs, Kat's YSI deployments",Y,Y,"Sea otters, halibut, rockfish, dungeness, rock crab, pipefish","Dungeness, Halibut, Dungeness, Red Rock Crab","Yes, trap data from deployed shrimp pots and minnow traps",Y,Y,Y,ND,ND
ElkSlu_2_2016_Restoration_Project,ElkhornSlough_2016_Plot_D,ElkhornSlough_2016_Plot_D_18 mo,Peer-review,"UCSC, ESNERR",Elkhorn Slough,Elkhorn Slough-C-Seal Bend,36.81,-121.78,C. Cal,"Sea otters, Green crab",N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,Anchored with galvanized stakes,NA,Y,Recovering/Expanding,NA,NA,80,ND,153.7,16.3,NA,NA,"Expanding, have been thriving since 1980s, beds are moving farther up and patches are popping up in tidal creeks",2016,March,Winter,2,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 13",18,NA,-3.3,0 - 2m MLLW,36.813374,-121.75537,1320,0.25,19.06,80,88,59.652326,ND,NA,Plots persisting and expanding through time and gradually begining to funciton similarly to reference meadows,Y,Y,"Since the other projects don't have these other metrics (internodal distances, shoot blade width) I am not including them in here for times sake, if we decide we want them I can transfer them",N,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,N,"CDMO Database for NERRs, Kat's YSI deployments",Y,Y,"Sea otters, halibut, rockfish, dungeness, rock crab, pipefish","Dungeness, Halibut, Dungeness, Red Rock Crab","Yes, trap data from deployed shrimp pots and minnow traps",Y,Y,Y,ND,ND
ElkSlu_1_2015_Restoration_Project,ElkhornSlough_2015_Plot_D,ElkhornSlough_2015_Plot_D_27 mo,Peer-review,"UCSC, ESNERR",Elkhorn Slough,Elkhorn Slough-B-CropCircles,36.81,-121.78,C. Cal,"Sea otters, Green crab",N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,Anchored with galvanized stakes,NA,Y,Recovering/Expanding,NA,NA,80,ND,153.7,16.3,NA,NA,"Expanding, have been thriving since 1980s, beds are moving farther up and patches are popping up in tidal creeks",2015,May,Spring,3,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 13",27,NA,-3.3,0 - 2m MLLW,36.813374,-121.75537,1020,0.25,19.6,80,120.8,69.0738735,ND,NA,Plots persisting and expanding through time and gradually begining to funciton similarly to reference meadows,Y,Y,"Since the other projects don't have these other metrics (internodal distances, shoot blade width) I am not including them in here for times sake, if we decide we want them I can transfer them",N,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,N,"CDMO Database for NERRs, Kat's YSI deployments",Y,Y,"Sea otters, halibut, rockfish, dungeness, rock crab, pipefish","Dungeness, Halibut, Dungeness, Red Rock Crab","Yes, trap data from deployed shrimp pots and minnow traps",Y,Y,Y,ND,ND
ElkSlu_1_2015_Restoration_Project,ElkhornSlough_2015_Plot_D,ElkhornSlough_2015_Plot_D_3 mo,Peer-review,"UCSC, ESNERR",Elkhorn Slough,Elkhorn Slough-B-CropCircles,36.81,-121.78,C. Cal,"Sea otters, Green crab",N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,Anchored with galvanized stakes,NA,Y,Recovering/Expanding,NA,NA,80,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Expanding, have been thriving since 1980s, beds are moving farther up and patches are popping up in tidal creeks",2015,May,Spring,3,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 13",3,NA,-3.3,0 - 2m MLLW,36.813374,-121.75537,1020,0.25,2.5,80,91.2727273,80.6536929,ND,NA,Plots persisting and expanding through time and gradually begining to funciton similarly to reference meadows,Y,Y,"Since the other projects don't have these other metrics (internodal distances, shoot blade width) I am not including them in here for times sake, if we decide we want them I can transfer them",N,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,N,"CDMO Database for NERRs, Kat's YSI deployments",Y,Y,"Sea otters, halibut, rockfish, dungeness, rock crab, pipefish","Dungeness, Halibut, Dungeness, Red Rock Crab","Yes, trap data from deployed shrimp pots and minnow traps",Y,Y,Y,ND,ND
ElkSlu_2_2016_Restoration_Project,ElkhornSlough_2016_Plot_D,ElkhornSlough_2016_Plot_D_30 mo,Peer-review,"UCSC, ESNERR",Elkhorn Slough,Elkhorn Slough-E-BtwRubisEandW_South,36.81,-121.78,C. Cal,"Sea otters, Green crab",N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,Anchored with galvanized stakes,NA,Y,Recovering/Expanding,61000,65000,80,ND,163.2,28.2,NA,NA,"Expanding, have been thriving since 1980s, beds are moving farther up and patches are popping up in tidal creeks",2016,March,Winter,2,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 13",30,NA,-3.3,0 - 2m MLLW,36.813374,-121.75537,1320,0.25,330.13,80,156.842105,99.8539284,ND,NA,Plots persisting and expanding through time and gradually begining to funciton similarly to reference meadows,Y,Y,"Since the other projects don't have these other metrics (internodal distances, shoot blade width) I am not including them in here for times sake, if we decide we want them I can transfer them",N,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,N,"CDMO Database for NERRs, Kat's YSI deployments",Y,Y,"Sea otters, halibut, rockfish, dungeness, rock crab, pipefish","Dungeness, Halibut, Dungeness, Red Rock Crab","Yes, trap data from deployed shrimp pots and minnow traps",Y,Y,Y,ND,ND
ElkSlu_1_2015_Restoration_Project,ElkhornSlough_2015_Plot_D,ElkhornSlough_2015_Plot_D_39 mo,Peer-review,"UCSC, ESNERR",Elkhorn Slough,Elkhorn Slough-D-BtwRubisEandW,36.81,-121.78,C. Cal,"Sea otters, Green crab",N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,Anchored with galvanized stakes,NA,Y,Recovering/Expanding,61000,65000,80,ND,163.2,28.2,NA,NA,"Expanding, have been thriving since 1980s, beds are moving farther up and patches are popping up in tidal creeks",2015,May,Spring,3,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 13",39,NA,-3.3,0 - 2m MLLW,36.813374,-121.75537,1020,0.25,396.75,80,146,108.357433,ND,NA,Plots persisting and expanding through time and gradually begining to funciton similarly to reference meadows,Y,Y,"Since the other projects don't have these other metrics (internodal distances, shoot blade width) I am not including them in here for times sake, if we decide we want them I can transfer them",N,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,N,"CDMO Database for NERRs, Kat's YSI deployments",Y,Y,"Sea otters, halibut, rockfish, dungeness, rock crab, pipefish","Dungeness, Halibut, Dungeness, Red Rock Crab","Yes, trap data from deployed shrimp pots and minnow traps",Y,Y,Y,ND,ND
ElkSlu_1_2015_Restoration_Project,ElkhornSlough_2015_Plot_D,ElkhornSlough_2015_Plot_D_6 mo,Peer-review,"UCSC, ESNERR",Elkhorn Slough,Elkhorn Slough-C-Seal Bend,36.81,-121.78,C. Cal,"Sea otters, Green crab",N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,Anchored with galvanized stakes,NA,Y,Recovering/Expanding,NA,NA,80,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Expanding, have been thriving since 1980s, beds are moving farther up and patches are popping up in tidal creeks",2015,May,Spring,3,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 13",6,NA,-3.3,0 - 2m MLLW,36.813374,-121.75537,1020,0.25,6.97,80,62.4,57.9409661,ND,NA,Plots persisting and expanding through time and gradually begining to funciton similarly to reference meadows,Y,Y,"Since the other projects don't have these other metrics (internodal distances, shoot blade width) I am not including them in here for times sake, if we decide we want them I can transfer them",N,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,N,"CDMO Database for NERRs, Kat's YSI deployments",Y,Y,"Sea otters, halibut, rockfish, dungeness, rock crab, pipefish","Dungeness, Halibut, Dungeness, Red Rock Crab","Yes, trap data from deployed shrimp pots and minnow traps",Y,Y,Y,ND,ND
ElkSlu_2_2016_Restoration_Project,ElkhornSlough_2016_Plot_D,ElkhornSlough_2016_Plot_D_6 mo,Peer-review,"UCSC, ESNERR",Elkhorn Slough,Elkhorn Slough-A-Vierras,36.81,-121.78,C. Cal,"Sea otters, Green crab",N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,Anchored with galvanized stakes,NA,Y,Recovering/Expanding,NA,NA,80,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Expanding, have been thriving since 1980s, beds are moving farther up and patches are popping up in tidal creeks",2016,March,Winter,2,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 13",6,NA,-3.3,0 - 2m MLLW,36.813374,-121.75537,1320,0.25,3.5,80,46.8,38.7837308,ND,NA,Plots persisting and expanding through time and gradually begining to funciton similarly to reference meadows,Y,Y,"Since the other projects don't have these other metrics (internodal distances, shoot blade width) I am not including them in here for times sake, if we decide we want them I can transfer them",N,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,N,"CDMO Database for NERRs, Kat's YSI deployments",Y,Y,"Sea otters, halibut, rockfish, dungeness, rock crab, pipefish","Dungeness, Halibut, Dungeness, Red Rock Crab","Yes, trap data from deployed shrimp pots and minnow traps",Y,Y,Y,ND,ND
ElkSlu_1_2015_Restoration_Project,ElkhornSlough_2015_Plot_E,ElkhornSlough_2015_Plot_E_1 mo,Peer-review,"UCSC, ESNERR",Elkhorn Slough,Elkhorn Slough-B-CropCircles,36.81,-121.78,C. Cal,"Sea otters, Green crab",N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,Anchored with galvanized stakes,NA,Y,Recovering/Expanding,NA,NA,80,ND,80,ND,NA,NA,"Expanding, have been thriving since 1980s, beds are moving farther up and patches are popping up in tidal creeks",2015,May,Spring,3,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 13",1,NA,-3.3,0 - 2m MLLW,36.813763,-121.75343,1020,0.25,2.25,80,44,26.4121184,ND,NA,Plots persisting and expanding through time and gradually begining to funciton similarly to reference meadows,Y,Y,"Since the other projects don't have these other metrics (internodal distances, shoot blade width) I am not including them in here for times sake, if we decide we want them I can transfer them",N,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,N,"CDMO Database for NERRs, Kat's YSI deployments",Y,Y,"Sea otters, halibut, rockfish, dungeness, rock crab, pipefish","Dungeness, Halibut, Dungeness, Red Rock Crab","Yes, trap data from deployed shrimp pots and minnow traps",Y,Y,Y,ND,ND
ElkSlu_1_2015_Restoration_Project,ElkhornSlough_2015_Plot_E,ElkhornSlough_2015_Plot_E_15 mo,Peer-review,"UCSC, ESNERR",Elkhorn Slough,Elkhorn Slough-E-BtwRubisEandW_South,36.81,-121.78,C. Cal,"Sea otters, Green crab",N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,Anchored with galvanized stakes,NA,Y,Recovering/Expanding,NA,NA,80,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Expanding, have been thriving since 1980s, beds are moving farther up and patches are popping up in tidal creeks",2015,May,Spring,3,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12",15,NA,-3.3,0 - 2m MLLW,36.813763,-121.75343,1020,0.25,0.46,80,36,50.9116882,ND,NA,Plots persisting and expanding through time and gradually begining to funciton similarly to reference meadows,Y,Y,"Since the other projects don't have these other metrics (internodal distances, shoot blade width) I am not including them in here for times sake, if we decide we want them I can transfer them",N,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,N,"CDMO Database for NERRs, Kat's YSI deployments",Y,Y,"Sea otters, halibut, rockfish, dungeness, rock crab, pipefish","Dungeness, Halibut, Dungeness, Red Rock Crab","Yes, trap data from deployed shrimp pots and minnow traps",Y,Y,Y,ND,ND
ElkSlu_2_2016_Restoration_Project,ElkhornSlough_2016_Plot_E,ElkhornSlough_2016_Plot_E_18 mo,Peer-review,"UCSC, ESNERR",Elkhorn Slough,Elkhorn Slough-C-Seal Bend,36.81,-121.78,C. Cal,"Sea otters, Green crab",N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,Anchored with galvanized stakes,NA,Y,Recovering/Expanding,NA,NA,80,ND,153.7,16.3,NA,NA,"Expanding, have been thriving since 1980s, beds are moving farther up and patches are popping up in tidal creeks",2016,March,Winter,2,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 13",18,NA,-3.3,0 - 2m MLLW,36.813763,-121.75343,1320,0.25,20.06,80,112,13.8564065,ND,NA,Plots persisting and expanding through time and gradually begining to funciton similarly to reference meadows,Y,Y,"Since the other projects don't have these other metrics (internodal distances, shoot blade width) I am not including them in here for times sake, if we decide we want them I can transfer them",N,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,N,"CDMO Database for NERRs, Kat's YSI deployments",Y,Y,"Sea otters, halibut, rockfish, dungeness, rock crab, pipefish","Dungeness, Halibut, Dungeness, Red Rock Crab","Yes, trap data from deployed shrimp pots and minnow traps",Y,Y,Y,ND,ND
ElkSlu_1_2015_Restoration_Project,ElkhornSlough_2015_Plot_E,ElkhornSlough_2015_Plot_E_27 mo,Peer-review,"UCSC, ESNERR",Elkhorn Slough,Elkhorn Slough-B-CropCircles,36.81,-121.78,C. Cal,"Sea otters, Green crab",N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,Anchored with galvanized stakes,NA,Y,Recovering/Expanding,NA,NA,80,ND,153.7,16.3,NA,NA,"Expanding, have been thriving since 1980s, beds are moving farther up and patches are popping up in tidal creeks",2015,May,Spring,3,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 14",27,NA,-3.3,0 - 2m MLLW,36.813763,-121.75343,1020,0.25,23.43,80,178,31.1126984,ND,NA,Plots persisting and expanding through time and gradually begining to funciton similarly to reference meadows,Y,Y,"Since the other projects don't have these other metrics (internodal distances, shoot blade width) I am not including them in here for times sake, if we decide we want them I can transfer them",N,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,N,"CDMO Database for NERRs, Kat's YSI deployments",Y,Y,"Sea otters, halibut, rockfish, dungeness, rock crab, pipefish","Dungeness, Halibut, Dungeness, Red Rock Crab","Yes, trap data from deployed shrimp pots and minnow traps",Y,Y,Y,ND,ND
ElkSlu_1_2015_Restoration_Project,ElkhornSlough_2015_Plot_E,ElkhornSlough_2015_Plot_E_3 mo,Peer-review,"UCSC, ESNERR",Elkhorn Slough,Elkhorn Slough-C-Seal Bend,36.81,-121.78,C. Cal,"Sea otters, Green crab",N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,Anchored with galvanized stakes,NA,Y,Recovering/Expanding,NA,NA,80,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Expanding, have been thriving since 1980s, beds are moving farther up and patches are popping up in tidal creeks",2015,May,Spring,3,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 13",3,NA,-3.3,0 - 2m MLLW,36.813763,-121.75343,1020,0.25,1,80,15.6,31.4084207,ND,NA,Plots persisting and expanding through time and gradually begining to funciton similarly to reference meadows,Y,Y,"Since the other projects don't have these other metrics (internodal distances, shoot blade width) I am not including them in here for times sake, if we decide we want them I can transfer them",N,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,N,"CDMO Database for NERRs, Kat's YSI deployments",Y,Y,"Sea otters, halibut, rockfish, dungeness, rock crab, pipefish","Dungeness, Halibut, Dungeness, Red Rock Crab","Yes, trap data from deployed shrimp pots and minnow traps",Y,Y,Y,ND,ND
ElkSlu_2_2016_Restoration_Project,ElkhornSlough_2016_Plot_E,ElkhornSlough_2016_Plot_E_30 mo,Peer-review,"UCSC, ESNERR",Elkhorn Slough,Elkhorn Slough-E-BtwRubisEandW_South,36.81,-121.78,C. Cal,"Sea otters, Green crab",N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,Anchored with galvanized stakes,NA,Y,Recovering/Expanding,61000,65000,80,ND,163.2,28.2,NA,NA,"Expanding, have been thriving since 1980s, beds are moving farther up and patches are popping up in tidal creeks",2016,March,Winter,2,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 13",30,NA,-3.3,0 - 2m MLLW,36.813763,-121.75343,1320,0.25,236.49,80,120.615385,94.2032718,ND,NA,Plots persisting and expanding through time and gradually begining to funciton similarly to reference meadows,Y,Y,"Since the other projects don't have these other metrics (internodal distances, shoot blade width) I am not including them in here for times sake, if we decide we want them I can transfer them",N,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,N,"CDMO Database for NERRs, Kat's YSI deployments",Y,Y,"Sea otters, halibut, rockfish, dungeness, rock crab, pipefish","Dungeness, Halibut, Dungeness, Red Rock Crab","Yes, trap data from deployed shrimp pots and minnow traps",Y,Y,Y,ND,ND
ElkSlu_1_2015_Restoration_Project,ElkhornSlough_2015_Plot_E,ElkhornSlough_2015_Plot_E_39 mo,Peer-review,"UCSC, ESNERR",Elkhorn Slough,Elkhorn Slough-D-BtwRubisEandW,36.81,-121.78,C. Cal,"Sea otters, Green crab",N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,Anchored with galvanized stakes,NA,Y,Recovering/Expanding,61000,65000,80,ND,163.2,28.2,NA,NA,"Expanding, have been thriving since 1980s, beds are moving farther up and patches are popping up in tidal creeks",2015,May,Spring,3,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 13",39,NA,-3.3,0 - 2m MLLW,36.813763,-121.75343,1020,0.25,108.96,80,106,122.578954,ND,NA,Plots persisting and expanding through time and gradually begining to funciton similarly to reference meadows,Y,Y,"Since the other projects don't have these other metrics (internodal distances, shoot blade width) I am not including them in here for times sake, if we decide we want them I can transfer them",N,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,N,"CDMO Database for NERRs, Kat's YSI deployments",Y,Y,"Sea otters, halibut, rockfish, dungeness, rock crab, pipefish","Dungeness, Halibut, Dungeness, Red Rock Crab","Yes, trap data from deployed shrimp pots and minnow traps",Y,Y,Y,ND,ND
ElkSlu_1_2015_Restoration_Project,ElkhornSlough_2015_Plot_E,ElkhornSlough_2015_Plot_E_6 mo,Peer-review,"UCSC, ESNERR",Elkhorn Slough,Elkhorn Slough-D-BtwRubisEandW,36.81,-121.78,C. Cal,"Sea otters, Green crab",N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,Anchored with galvanized stakes,NA,Y,Recovering/Expanding,NA,NA,80,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Expanding, have been thriving since 1980s, beds are moving farther up and patches are popping up in tidal creeks",2015,May,Spring,3,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 13",6,NA,-3.3,0 - 2m MLLW,36.813763,-121.75343,1020,0.25,1.14,80,8.88888889,17.6383421,ND,NA,Plots persisting and expanding through time and gradually begining to funciton similarly to reference meadows,Y,Y,"Since the other projects don't have these other metrics (internodal distances, shoot blade width) I am not including them in here for times sake, if we decide we want them I can transfer them",N,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,N,"CDMO Database for NERRs, Kat's YSI deployments",Y,Y,"Sea otters, halibut, rockfish, dungeness, rock crab, pipefish","Dungeness, Halibut, Dungeness, Red Rock Crab","Yes, trap data from deployed shrimp pots and minnow traps",Y,Y,Y,ND,ND
ElkSlu_2_2016_Restoration_Project,ElkhornSlough_2016_Plot_E,ElkhornSlough_2016_Plot_E_6 mo,Peer-review,"UCSC, ESNERR",Elkhorn Slough,Elkhorn Slough-A-Vierras,36.81,-121.78,C. Cal,"Sea otters, Green crab",N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,Anchored with galvanized stakes,NA,Y,Recovering/Expanding,NA,NA,80,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Expanding, have been thriving since 1980s, beds are moving farther up and patches are popping up in tidal creeks",2016,March,Winter,2,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 13",6,NA,-3.3,0 - 2m MLLW,36.813763,-121.75343,1320,0.25,0.75,80,26,37.7359245,ND,NA,Plots persisting and expanding through time and gradually begining to funciton similarly to reference meadows,Y,Y,"Since the other projects don't have these other metrics (internodal distances, shoot blade width) I am not including them in here for times sake, if we decide we want them I can transfer them",N,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,N,"CDMO Database for NERRs, Kat's YSI deployments",Y,Y,"Sea otters, halibut, rockfish, dungeness, rock crab, pipefish","Dungeness, Halibut, Dungeness, Red Rock Crab","Yes, trap data from deployed shrimp pots and minnow traps",Y,Y,Y,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T1_Plot1_Deep,T1_Plot1_Deep_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,February,Winter,0.33,"Months 1, 3, 4",1,NA,-0.7,Intertidal ,35.35461,-120.84957,128,1,ND,128,174,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T1_Plot1_Deep,T1_Plot1_Deep_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,February,Winter,0.33,"Months 1, 3, 4",3,NA,-0.7,Intertidal ,35.35461,-120.84957,128,1,ND,128,556,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T1_Plot1_Deep,T1_Plot1_Deep_4mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,February,Winter,0.33,"Months 1, 3, 4",4,NA,-0.7,Intertidal ,35.35461,-120.84957,128,1,ND,128,644,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T1_Plot2_Deep,T1_Plot2_Deep_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,February,Winter,0.33,"Months 1, 3, 4",1,NA,-0.7,Intertidal ,35.35468,-120.84966,114,1,ND,114,137,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T1_Plot2_Deep,T1_Plot2_Deep_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,February,Winter,0.33,"Months 1, 3, 4",3,NA,-0.7,Intertidal ,35.35468,-120.84966,114,1,ND,114,292,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T1_Plot2_Deep,T1_Plot2_Deep_4mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,February,Winter,0.33,"Months 1, 3, 4",4,NA,-0.7,Intertidal ,35.35468,-120.84966,114,1,ND,114,392,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T1_Plot3_Deep,T1_Plot3_Deep_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,February,Winter,0.33,"Months 1, 3, 4",1,NA,-0.7,Intertidal ,35.35467,-120.8497,109,1,ND,109,162,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T1_Plot3_Deep,T1_Plot3_Deep_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,February,Winter,0.33,"Months 1, 3, 4",3,NA,-0.7,Intertidal ,35.35467,-120.8497,109,1,ND,109,742,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T1_Plot3_Deep,T1_Plot3_Deep_4mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,February,Winter,0.33,"Months 1, 3, 4",4,NA,-0.7,Intertidal ,35.35467,-120.8497,109,1,ND,109,536,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T1_Plot1_mid,T1_Plot1_mid_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,February,Winter,0.33,"Months 1, 3, 4",1,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.35457,-120.84962,142,1,ND,142,173,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T1_Plot1_mid,T1_Plot1_mid_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,February,Winter,0.33,"Months 1, 3, 4",3,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.35457,-120.84962,142,1,ND,142,430,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T1_Plot1_mid,T1_Plot1_mid_4mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,February,Winter,0.33,"Months 1, 3, 4",4,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.35457,-120.84962,142,1,ND,142,626,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T1_Plot2_mid,T1_Plot2_mid_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,February,Winter,0.33,"Months 1, 3, 4",1,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.35462,-120.8497,105,1,ND,105,130,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T1_Plot2_mid,T1_Plot2_mid_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,February,Winter,0.33,"Months 1, 3, 4",3,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.35462,-120.8497,105,1,ND,105,506,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T1_Plot2_mid,T1_Plot2_mid_4mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,February,Winter,0.33,"Months 1, 3, 4",4,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.35462,-120.8497,105,1,ND,105,696,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T1_Plot3_mid,T1_Plot3_mid_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,February,Winter,0.33,"Months 1, 3, 4",1,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.35461,-120.84974,97,1,ND,97,158,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T1_Plot3_mid,T1_Plot3_mid_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,February,Winter,0.33,"Months 1, 3, 4",3,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.35461,-120.84974,97,1,ND,97,395,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T1_Plot3_mid,T1_Plot3_mid_4mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,February,Winter,0.33,"Months 1, 3, 4",4,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.35461,-120.84974,97,1,ND,97,537,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T1_Plot1_shallow,T1_Plot1_shallow_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,February,Winter,0.33,"Months 1, 3, 4",1,NA,-0.1,Intertidal ,35.35453,-120.84965,124,1,ND,124,154,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T1_Plot1_shallow,T1_Plot1_shallow_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,February,Winter,0.33,"Months 1, 3, 4",3,NA,-0.1,Intertidal ,35.35453,-120.84965,124,1,ND,124,492,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T1_Plot1_shallow,T1_Plot1_shallow_4mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,February,Winter,0.33,"Months 1, 3, 4",4,NA,-0.1,Intertidal ,35.35453,-120.84965,124,1,ND,124,612,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T1_Plot2_shallow,T1_Plot2_shallow_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,February,Winter,0.33,"Months 1, 3, 4",1,NA,-0.1,Intertidal ,35.35457,-120.84972,103,1,ND,103,141,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T1_Plot2_shallow,T1_Plot2_shallow_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,February,Winter,0.33,"Months 1, 3, 4",3,NA,-0.1,Intertidal ,35.35457,-120.84972,103,1,ND,103,496,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T1_Plot2_shallow,T1_Plot2_shallow_4mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,February,Winter,0.33,"Months 1, 3, 4",4,NA,-0.1,Intertidal ,35.35457,-120.84972,103,1,ND,103,645,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T1_Plot3_shallow,T1_Plot3_shallow_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,February,Winter,0.33,"Months 1, 3, 4",1,NA,-0.1,Intertidal ,35.35459,-120.84977,108,1,ND,108,128,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T1_Plot3_shallow,T1_Plot3_shallow_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,February,Winter,0.33,"Months 1, 3, 4",3,NA,-0.1,Intertidal ,35.35459,-120.84977,108,1,ND,108,507,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T1_Plot3_shallow,T1_Plot3_shallow_4mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,February,Winter,0.33,"Months 1, 3, 4",4,NA,-0.1,Intertidal ,35.35459,-120.84977,108,1,ND,108,532,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T3_plot1,T3_plot1_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,0.75,"Months, 1, 2, 3, 4, 9",1,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.34458,-120.84674,184,1,ND,184,147,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T3_plot1,T3_plot1_2mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,0.75,"Months, 1, 2, 3, 4, 9",2,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.34458,-120.84674,184,1,ND,184,227,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T3_plot1,T3_plot1_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,0.75,"Months, 1, 2, 3, 4, 9",3,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.34458,-120.84674,184,1,ND,184,435,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T3_plot1,T3_plot1_4mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,0.75,"Months, 1, 2, 3, 4, 9",4,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.34458,-120.84674,184,1,ND,184,876,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T3_plot1,T3_plot1_9mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,0.75,"Months, 1, 2, 3, 4, 9",9,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.34458,-120.84674,184,1,ND,184,540,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T3_plot2,T3_plot2_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,0.75,"Months, 1, 2, 3, 4, 9",1,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.34464,-120.84673,152,1,ND,152,81,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T3_plot2,T3_plot2_2mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,0.75,"Months, 1, 2, 3, 4, 9",2,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.34464,-120.84673,152,1,ND,152,95,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T3_plot2,T3_plot2_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,0.75,"Months, 1, 2, 3, 4, 9",3,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.34464,-120.84673,152,1,ND,152,199,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T3_plot2,T3_plot2_4mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,0.75,"Months, 1, 2, 3, 4, 9",4,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.34464,-120.84673,152,1,ND,152,490,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T3_plot2,T3_plot2_9mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,0.75,"Months, 1, 2, 3, 4, 9",9,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.34464,-120.84673,152,1,ND,152,720,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T3_plot3,T3_plot3_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,0.75,"Months, 1, 2, 3, 4, 9",1,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.34465,-120.84673,152,1,ND,152,88,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T3_plot3,T3_plot3_2mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,0.75,"Months, 1, 2, 3, 4, 9",2,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.34465,-120.84673,152,1,ND,152,89,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T3_plot3,T3_plot3_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,0.75,"Months, 1, 2, 3, 4, 9",3,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.34465,-120.84673,152,1,ND,152,168,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T3_plot3,T3_plot3_4mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,0.75,"Months, 1, 2, 3, 4, 9",4,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.34465,-120.84673,152,1,ND,152,367,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T3_plot3,T3_plot3_9mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,0.75,"Months, 1, 2, 3, 4, 9",9,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.34465,-120.84673,152,1,ND,152,604,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T4_plot1,T4_plot1_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,0.25,"Months 1, 2, 3",1,NA,-0.52,Intertidal ,35.34286,-120.84884,111,1,ND,111,110,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T4_plot1,T4_plot1_2mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,0.25,"Months 1, 2, 3",2,NA,-0.52,Intertidal ,35.34286,-120.84884,111,1,ND,111,179,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T4_plot1,T4_plot1_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,0.25,"Months 1, 2, 3",3,NA,-0.52,Intertidal ,35.34286,-120.84884,111,1,ND,111,350,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T4_plot2,T4_plot2_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,0.25,"Months 1, 2, 3",1,NA,-0.52,Intertidal ,35.3429,-120.84887,127,1,ND,127,132,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T4_plot2,T4_plot2_2mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,0.25,"Months 1, 2, 3",2,NA,-0.52,Intertidal ,35.3429,-120.84887,127,1,ND,127,236,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T4_plot2,T4_plot2_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,0.25,"Months 1, 2, 3",3,NA,-0.52,Intertidal ,35.3429,-120.84887,127,1,ND,127,434,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T4_plot3,T4_plot3_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,0.25,"Months 1, 2, 3",1,NA,-0.52,Intertidal ,35.34295,-120.8489,125,1,ND,125,131,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T4_plot3,T4_plot3_2mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,0.25,"Months 1, 2, 3",2,NA,-0.52,Intertidal ,35.34295,-120.8489,125,1,ND,125,227,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T4_plot3,T4_plot3_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,0.25,"Months 1, 2, 3",3,NA,-0.52,Intertidal ,35.34295,-120.8489,125,1,ND,125,450,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T4_RebarPlot1,T4_RebarPlot1_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,0.25,"Months 1, 2, 3",1,NA,-0.52,Intertidal ,35.34296,-120.8489,40,1,ND,40,36,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T4_RebarPlot1,T4_RebarPlot1_2mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,0.25,"Months 1, 2, 3",2,NA,-0.52,Intertidal ,35.34296,-120.8489,40,1,ND,40,36,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T4_RebarPlot1,T4_RebarPlot1_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,0.25,"Months 1, 2, 3",3,NA,-0.52,Intertidal ,35.34296,-120.8489,40,1,ND,40,71,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T4_RebarPlot2,T4_RebarPlot2_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,0.25,"Months 1, 2, 3",1,NA,-0.52,Intertidal ,35.34298,-120.84891,42,1,ND,42,56,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T4_RebarPlot2,T4_RebarPlot2_2mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,0.25,"Months 1, 2, 3",2,NA,-0.52,Intertidal ,35.34298,-120.84891,42,1,ND,42,64,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T4_RebarPlot2,T4_RebarPlot2_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,0.25,"Months 1, 2, 3",3,NA,-0.52,Intertidal ,35.34298,-120.84891,42,1,ND,42,105,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T4_RebarPlot3,T4_RebarPlot3_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,0.25,"Months 1, 2, 3",1,NA,-0.52,Intertidal ,35.34294,-120.84895,49,1,ND,49,58,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T4_RebarPlot3,T4_RebarPlot3_2mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,0.25,"Months 1, 2, 3",2,NA,-0.52,Intertidal ,35.34294,-120.84895,49,1,ND,49,63,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T4_RebarPlot3,T4_RebarPlot3_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,0.25,"Months 1, 2, 3",3,NA,-0.52,Intertidal ,35.34294,-120.84895,49,1,ND,49,118,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T5_Plot1,T5_Plot1_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,0.25,"Months 1, 3",1,NA,-0.57,Intertidal ,35.33844,-120.84721,134,1,ND,134,134,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T5_Plot1,T5_Plot1_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,0.25,"Months 1, 3",3,NA,-0.57,Intertidal ,35.33844,-120.84721,134,1,ND,134,367,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T5_Plot2,T5_Plot2_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,0.25,"Months 1, 3",1,NA,-0.57,Intertidal ,35.33848,-120.8472,137,1,ND,137,147,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T5_Plot2,T5_Plot2_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,0.25,"Months 1, 3",3,NA,-0.57,Intertidal ,35.33848,-120.8472,137,1,ND,137,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T5_Plot3,T5_Plot3_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,0.25,"Months 1, 3",1,NA,-0.57,Intertidal ,35.33853,-120.8472,126,1,ND,126,158,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T5_Plot3,T5_Plot3_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,0.25,"Months 1, 3",3,NA,-0.57,Intertidal ,35.33853,-120.8472,126,1,ND,126,352,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T5_RebarPlot1,T5_RebarPlot1_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,0.25,"Months 1, 3",1,NA,-0.57,Intertidal ,35.33852,-120.8472,48,1,ND,48,72,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T5_RebarPlot1,T5_RebarPlot1_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,0.25,"Months 1, 3",3,NA,-0.57,Intertidal ,35.33852,-120.8472,48,1,ND,48,137,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T5_RebarPlot2,T5_RebarPlot2_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,0.25,"Months 1, 3",1,NA,-0.57,Intertidal ,35.33855,-120.84715,51,1,ND,51,72,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T5_RebarPlot2,T5_RebarPlot2_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,0.25,"Months 1, 3",3,NA,-0.57,Intertidal ,35.33855,-120.84715,51,1,ND,51,109,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T5_RebarPlot3,T5_RebarPlot3_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,0.25,"Months 1, 3",1,NA,-0.57,Intertidal ,35.33858,-120.84716,50,1,ND,50,71,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T5_RebarPlot3,T5_RebarPlot3_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,0.25,"Months 1, 3",3,NA,-0.57,Intertidal ,35.33858,-120.84716,50,1,ND,50,74,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T6_Plot1,T6_Plot1_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,1,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12",1,NA,1.45,Intertidal ,35.32233,-120.84692,157,1,ND,157,154,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T6_Plot1,T6_Plot1_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,1,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12",3,NA,1.45,Intertidal ,35.32233,-120.84692,157,1,ND,157,151,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T6_Plot1,T6_Plot1_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,1,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12",5,NA,1.45,Intertidal ,35.32233,-120.84692,157,1,ND,157,312,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T6_Plot1,T6_Plot1_9mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,1,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12",9,NA,1.45,Intertidal ,35.32233,-120.84692,157,1,ND,157,592,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T6_Plot1,T6_Plot1_12mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,1,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12",12,NA,1.45,Intertidal ,35.32233,-120.84692,157,1,ND,157,276,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T6_Plot2,T6_Plot2_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,1,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12",1,NA,1.45,Intertidal ,35.32236,-120.84686,157,1,ND,157,204,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T6_Plot2,T6_Plot2_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,1,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12",3,NA,1.45,Intertidal ,35.32236,-120.84686,157,1,ND,157,172,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T6_Plot2,T6_Plot2_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,1,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12",5,NA,1.45,Intertidal ,35.32236,-120.84686,157,1,ND,157,448,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T6_Plot2,T6_Plot2_9mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,1,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12",9,NA,1.45,Intertidal ,35.32236,-120.84686,157,1,ND,157,804,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T6_Plot2,T6_Plot2_12mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,1,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12",12,NA,1.45,Intertidal ,35.32236,-120.84686,157,1,ND,157,408,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T6_Plot3,T6_Plot3_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,1,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12",1,NA,1.45,Intertidal ,35.32236,-120.84682,138,1,ND,138,177,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T6_Plot3,T6_Plot3_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,1,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12",3,NA,1.45,Intertidal ,35.32236,-120.84682,138,1,ND,138,150,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T6_Plot3,T6_Plot3_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,1,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12",5,NA,1.45,Intertidal ,35.32236,-120.84682,138,1,ND,138,370,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T6_Plot3,T6_Plot3_9mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,1,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12",9,NA,1.45,Intertidal ,35.32236,-120.84682,138,1,ND,138,428,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T6_Plot3,T6_Plot3_12mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,1,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12",12,NA,1.45,Intertidal ,35.32236,-120.84682,138,1,ND,138,248,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T6_Plot4,T6_Plot4_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,1,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12",1,NA,1.45,Intertidal ,35.32239,-120.84675,137,1,ND,137,169,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T6_Plot4,T6_Plot4_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,1,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12",3,NA,1.45,Intertidal ,35.32239,-120.84675,137,1,ND,137,260,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T6_Plot4,T6_Plot4_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,1,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12",5,NA,1.45,Intertidal ,35.32239,-120.84675,137,1,ND,137,437,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T6_Plot4,T6_Plot4_9mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,1,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12",9,NA,1.45,Intertidal ,35.32239,-120.84675,137,1,ND,137,776,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T6_Plot4,T6_Plot4_12mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,1,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12",12,NA,1.45,Intertidal ,35.32239,-120.84675,137,1,ND,137,384,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T6_RebarPlot1,T6_RebarPlot1_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,1,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12",1,NA,1.45,Intertidal ,35.32241,-120.84671,40,1,ND,40,45,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T6_RebarPlot1,T6_RebarPlot1_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,1,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12",3,NA,1.45,Intertidal ,35.32241,-120.84671,40,1,ND,40,44,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T6_RebarPlot1,T6_RebarPlot1_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,1,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12",5,NA,1.45,Intertidal ,35.32241,-120.84671,40,1,ND,40,77,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T6_RebarPlot1,T6_RebarPlot1_9mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,1,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12",9,NA,1.45,Intertidal ,35.32241,-120.84671,40,1,ND,40,265,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T6_RebarPlot1,T6_RebarPlot1_12mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,1,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12",12,NA,1.45,Intertidal ,35.32241,-120.84671,40,1,ND,40,91,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T6_RebarPlot2,T6_RebarPlot2_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,1,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12",1,NA,1.45,Intertidal ,35.32224,-120.84669,39,1,ND,39,52,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T6_RebarPlot2,T6_RebarPlot2_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,1,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12",3,NA,1.45,Intertidal ,35.32224,-120.84669,39,1,ND,39,14,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T6_RebarPlot2,T6_RebarPlot2_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,1,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12",5,NA,1.45,Intertidal ,35.32224,-120.84669,39,1,ND,39,28,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T6_RebarPlot2,T6_RebarPlot2_9mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,1,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12",9,NA,1.45,Intertidal ,35.32224,-120.84669,39,1,ND,39,22,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T6_RebarPlot2,T6_RebarPlot2_12mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,1,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12",12,NA,1.45,Intertidal ,35.32224,-120.84669,39,1,ND,39,12,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T6_RebarPlot3,T6_RebarPlot3_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,1,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12",1,NA,1.45,Intertidal ,35.3224,-120.84667,40,1,ND,40,45,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T6_RebarPlot3,T6_RebarPlot3_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,1,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12",3,NA,1.45,Intertidal ,35.3224,-120.84667,40,1,ND,40,13,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T6_RebarPlot3,T6_RebarPlot3_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,1,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12",5,NA,1.45,Intertidal ,35.3224,-120.84667,40,1,ND,40,21,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T6_RebarPlot3,T6_RebarPlot3_9mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,1,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12",9,NA,1.45,Intertidal ,35.3224,-120.84667,40,1,ND,40,41,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T6_RebarPlot3,T6_RebarPlot3_12mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,1,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12",12,NA,1.45,Intertidal ,35.3224,-120.84667,40,1,ND,40,25,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T6_RebarPlot4,T6_RebarPlot4_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,1,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12",1,NA,1.45,Intertidal ,35.3224,-120.84666,40,1,ND,40,61,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T6_RebarPlot4,T6_RebarPlot4_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,1,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12",3,NA,1.45,Intertidal ,35.3224,-120.84666,40,1,ND,40,58,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T6_RebarPlot4,T6_RebarPlot4_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,1,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12",5,NA,1.45,Intertidal ,35.3224,-120.84666,40,1,ND,40,120,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T6_RebarPlot4,T6_RebarPlot4_9mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,1,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12",9,NA,1.45,Intertidal ,35.3224,-120.84666,40,1,ND,40,189,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2018,T6_RebarPlot4,T6_RebarPlot4_12mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2018,March,Spring,1,"Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12",12,NA,1.45,Intertidal ,35.3224,-120.84666,40,1,ND,40,120,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T1_Plot1,T1_Plot1_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",1,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.35468,-120.84974,184,1,NA,184,187,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T1_Plot2,T1_Plot2_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",1,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.35471,-120.84982,172,1,NA,172,168,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T1_Plot3,T1_Plot3_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",1,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.35474,-120.84987,191,1,NA,191,189,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T1_Plot4,T1_Plot4_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",1,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.35478,-120.84992,205,1,NA,205,186,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T1_Plot1,T1_Plot1_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",3,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.35468,-120.84974,184,1,NA,184,345,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T1_Plot2,T1_Plot2_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",3,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.35471,-120.84982,172,1,NA,172,234,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T1_Plot3,T1_Plot3_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",3,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.35474,-120.84987,191,1,NA,191,230,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T1_Plot4,T1_Plot4_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",3,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.35478,-120.84992,205,1,NA,205,264,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T1_Plot1,T1_Plot1_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",6,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.35468,-120.84974,184,1,NA,184,650,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T1_Plot2,T1_Plot2_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",6,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.35471,-120.84982,172,1,NA,172,464,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T1_Plot3,T1_Plot3_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",6,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.35474,-120.84987,191,1,NA,191,545,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T1_Plot4,T1_Plot4_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",6,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.35478,-120.84992,205,1,NA,205,423,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T7_RebarPlot1,T7_RebarPlot1_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",1,NA,-0.5,Intertidal ,35.35486,-120.8522,64,1,NA,64,55,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T7_RebarPlot2,T7_RebarPlot2_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",1,NA,-0.5,Intertidal ,35.35486,-120.8522,54,1,NA,54,41,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T7_RebarPlot3,T7_RebarPlot3_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",1,NA,-0.5,Intertidal ,35.35486,-120.8522,66,1,NA,66,40,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T7_RebarPlot1,T7_RebarPlot1_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",3,NA,-0.5,Intertidal ,35.35486,-120.8522,64,1,NA,64,37,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T7_RebarPlot2,T7_RebarPlot2_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",3,NA,-0.5,Intertidal ,35.35486,-120.8522,54,1,NA,54,15,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T7_RebarPlot3,T7_RebarPlot3_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",3,NA,-0.5,Intertidal ,35.35486,-120.8522,66,1,NA,66,1,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T7_RebarPlot1,T7_RebarPlot1_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",6,NA,-0.5,Intertidal ,35.35486,-120.8522,64,1,NA,64,4,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T7_RebarPlot2,T7_RebarPlot2_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",6,NA,-0.5,Intertidal ,35.35486,-120.8522,54,1,NA,54,0,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T7_RebarPlot3,T7_RebarPlot3_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",6,NA,-0.5,Intertidal ,35.35486,-120.8522,66,1,NA,66,0,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T8_Plot1,T8_Plot1_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Tidelands donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",1,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.34882,-120.84752,205,1,NA,205,216,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T8_Plot2,T8_Plot2_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Tidelands donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",1,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.34.880,-120.84759,200,1,NA,200,262,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T8_Plot3,T8_Plot3_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Tidelands donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",1,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.34876,-120.84764,174,1,NA,174,287,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T8_Plot1,T8_Plot1_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Tidelands donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",3,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.34882,-120.84752,205,1,NA,205,525,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T8_Plot2,T8_Plot2_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Tidelands donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",3,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.34.880,-120.84759,200,1,NA,200,639,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T8_Plot3,T8_Plot3_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Tidelands donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",3,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.34876,-120.84764,174,1,NA,174,610,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T8_Plot1,T8_Plot1_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Tidelands donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",6,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.34882,-120.84752,205,1,NA,205,1039,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T8_Plot2,T8_Plot2_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Tidelands donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",6,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.34.880,-120.84759,200,1,NA,200,910,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T8_Plot3,T8_Plot3_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Tidelands donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",6,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.34876,-120.84764,174,1,NA,174,1008,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T8_RebarPlot1,T8_RebarPlot1_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Tidelands donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3",1,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.34874,-120.84766,62,1,NA,62,99,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T8_RebarPlot2,T8_RebarPlot2_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Tidelands donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3",1,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.34875,-120.84767,55,1,NA,55,87,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T8_RebarPlot3,T8_RebarPlot3_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Tidelands donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3",1,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.34872,-120.8477,59,1,NA,59,84,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T8_RebarPlot1,T8_RebarPlot1_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Tidelands donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3",3,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.34874,-120.84766,62,1,NA,62,189,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T8_RebarPlot2,T8_RebarPlot2_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Tidelands donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3",3,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.34875,-120.84767,55,1,NA,55,230,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T8_RebarPlot3,T8_RebarPlot3_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Tidelands donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3",3,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.34872,-120.8477,59,1,NA,59,193,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T10_Plot1,T10_Plot1_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Coleman donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",1,NA,0.7,Intertidal ,35.3437,-120.84941,133,1,NA,133,72,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T10_Plot2,T10_Plot2_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Coleman donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",1,NA,0.7,Intertidal ,35.34372,-120.84943,130,1,NA,130,37,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T10_Plot3,T10_Plot3_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Coleman donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",1,NA,0.7,Intertidal ,35.34373,-120.84945,135,1,NA,135,82,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T10_Plot4,T10_Plot4_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Coleman donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",1,NA,0.7,Intertidal ,35.34378,-120.84946,130,1,NA,130,87,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T10_Plot5,T10_Plot5_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Coleman donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",1,NA,0.7,Intertidal ,35.34379,-120.84948,106,1,NA,106,85,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T10_Plot6,T10_Plot6_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Coleman donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",1,NA,0.7,Intertidal ,35.34385,-120.84951,136,1,NA,136,69,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T10_Plot1,T10_Plot1_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Coleman donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",3,NA,0.7,Intertidal ,35.3437,-120.84941,133,1,NA,133,98,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T10_Plot2,T10_Plot2_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Coleman donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",3,NA,0.7,Intertidal ,35.34372,-120.84943,130,1,NA,130,45,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T10_Plot3,T10_Plot3_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Coleman donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",3,NA,0.7,Intertidal ,35.34373,-120.84945,135,1,NA,135,121,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T10_Plot4,T10_Plot4_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Coleman donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",3,NA,0.7,Intertidal ,35.34378,-120.84946,130,1,NA,130,131,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T10_Plot5,T10_Plot5_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Coleman donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",3,NA,0.7,Intertidal ,35.34379,-120.84948,106,1,NA,106,84,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T10_Plot6,T10_Plot6_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Coleman donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",3,NA,0.7,Intertidal ,35.34385,-120.84951,136,1,NA,136,115,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T10_Plot1,T10_Plot1_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Coleman donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",6,NA,0.7,Intertidal ,35.3437,-120.84941,133,1,NA,133,143,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T10_Plot2,T10_Plot2_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Coleman donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",6,NA,0.7,Intertidal ,35.34372,-120.84943,130,1,NA,130,159,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T10_Plot3,T10_Plot3_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Coleman donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",6,NA,0.7,Intertidal ,35.34373,-120.84945,135,1,NA,135,196,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T10_Plot4,T10_Plot4_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Coleman donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",6,NA,0.7,Intertidal ,35.34378,-120.84946,130,1,NA,130,170,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T10_Plot5,T10_Plot5_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Coleman donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",6,NA,0.7,Intertidal ,35.34379,-120.84948,106,1,NA,106,117,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T10_Plot6,T10_Plot6_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Coleman donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",6,NA,0.7,Intertidal ,35.34385,-120.84951,136,1,NA,136,169,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T11_Plot1,T11_Plot1_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",1,NA,-0.6,Intertidal ,35.3393925,-120.8472879,135,1,NA,135,115,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T11_Plot2,T11_Plot2_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",1,NA,-0.6,Intertidal ,35.339398,-120.8473587,134,1,NA,134,87,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T11_Plot3,T11_Plot3_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",1,NA,-0.6,Intertidal ,35.3395402,-120.847241,130,1,NA,130,96,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T11_Plot4,T11_Plot4_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",1,NA,-0.6,Intertidal ,35.3396203,-120.8476383,159,1,NA,159,107,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T11_Plot5,T11_Plot5_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",1,NA,-0.6,Intertidal ,35.33953,-120.84749,157,1,NA,157,91,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T11_Plot6,T11_Plot6_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",1,NA,-0.6,Intertidal ,35.33938,-120.84789,136,1,NA,136,142,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T11_Plot1,T11_Plot1_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",3,NA,-0.6,Intertidal ,35.3393925,-120.8472879,135,1,NA,135,115,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T11_Plot2,T11_Plot2_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",3,NA,-0.6,Intertidal ,35.339398,-120.8473587,134,1,NA,134,87,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T11_Plot3,T11_Plot3_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",3,NA,-0.6,Intertidal ,35.3395402,-120.847241,130,1,NA,130,96,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T11_Plot4,T11_Plot4_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",3,NA,-0.6,Intertidal ,35.3396203,-120.8476383,159,1,NA,159,107,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T11_Plot5,T11_Plot5_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",3,NA,-0.6,Intertidal ,35.33953,-120.84749,157,1,NA,157,91,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T11_Plot6,T11_Plot6_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",3,NA,-0.6,Intertidal ,35.33938,-120.84789,136,1,NA,136,142,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T11_Plot1,T11_Plot1_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",6,NA,-0.6,Intertidal ,35.3393925,-120.8472879,135,1,NA,135,115,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T11_Plot2,T11_Plot2_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",6,NA,-0.6,Intertidal ,35.339398,-120.8473587,134,1,NA,134,87,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T11_Plot3,T11_Plot3_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",6,NA,-0.6,Intertidal ,35.3395402,-120.847241,130,1,NA,130,96,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T11_Plot4,T11_Plot4_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",6,NA,-0.6,Intertidal ,35.3396203,-120.8476383,159,1,NA,159,107,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T11_Plot5,T11_Plot5_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",6,NA,-0.6,Intertidal ,35.33953,-120.84749,157,1,NA,157,91,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T11_Plot6,T11_Plot6_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",6,NA,-0.6,Intertidal ,35.33938,-120.84789,136,1,NA,136,142,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T13_Plot1_Shallow,T13_Plot1_Shallow_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",1,NA,0.4,Intertidal ,35.33791,-120.84546,150,1,NA,150,89,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T13_Plot2_Shallow,T13_Plot2_Shallow_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",1,NA,0.4,Intertidal ,35.33796,-120.84546,201,1,NA,201,115,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T13_Plot3_Shallow,T13_Plot3_Shallow_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",1,NA,0.4,Intertidal ,35.33802,-120.84546,178,1,NA,178,115,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T13_Plot1_Shallow,T13_Plot1_Shallow_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",3,NA,0.4,Intertidal ,35.33791,-120.84546,150,1,NA,150,59,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T13_Plot2_Shallow,T13_Plot2_Shallow_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",3,NA,0.4,Intertidal ,35.33796,-120.84546,201,1,NA,201,131,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T13_Plot3_Shallow,T13_Plot3_Shallow_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",3,NA,0.4,Intertidal ,35.33802,-120.84546,178,1,NA,178,175,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T13_Plot1_Shallow,T13_Plot1_Shallow_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",6,NA,0.4,Intertidal ,35.33791,-120.84546,150,1,NA,150,91,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T13_Plot2_Shallow,T13_Plot2_Shallow_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",6,NA,0.4,Intertidal ,35.33796,-120.84546,201,1,NA,201,204,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T13_Plot3_Shallow,T13_Plot3_Shallow_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",6,NA,0.4,Intertidal ,35.33802,-120.84546,178,1,NA,178,294,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T13_Plot1_Mid,T13_Plot1_Mid_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",1,NA,-0.1,Intertidal ,35.33795,-120.84552,151,1,NA,151,82,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T13_Plot2_Mid,T13_Plot2_Mid_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",1,NA,-0.1,Intertidal ,35.3386,-120.84552,178,1,NA,178,20,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T13_Plot3_Mid,T13_Plot3_Mid_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",1,NA,-0.1,Intertidal ,35.33802,-120.84552,191,1,NA,191,23,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T13_Plot1_Mid,T13_Plot1_Mid_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",3,NA,-0.1,Intertidal ,35.33795,-120.84552,151,1,NA,151,97,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T13_Plot2_Mid,T13_Plot2_Mid_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",3,NA,-0.1,Intertidal ,35.3386,-120.84552,178,1,NA,178,46,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T13_Plot3_Mid,T13_Plot3_Mid_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",3,NA,-0.1,Intertidal ,35.33802,-120.84552,191,1,NA,191,68,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T13_Plot1_Mid,T13_Plot1_Mid_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",6,NA,-0.1,Intertidal ,35.33795,-120.84552,151,1,NA,151,221,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T13_Plot2_Mid,T13_Plot2_Mid_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",6,NA,-0.1,Intertidal ,35.3386,-120.84552,178,1,NA,178,152,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T13_Plot3_Mid,T13_Plot3_Mid_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",6,NA,-0.1,Intertidal ,35.33802,-120.84552,191,1,NA,191,299,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T13_Plot1_Deep,T13_Plot1_Deep_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",1,NA,-0.5,Intertidal ,35.33794,-120.84555,193,1,NA,193,NA,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T13_Plot2_Deep,T13_Plot2_Deep_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",1,NA,-0.5,Intertidal ,35.33797,-120.84554,163,1,NA,163,NA,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T13_Plot3_Deep,T13_Plot3_Deep_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",1,NA,-0.5,Intertidal ,35.33802,-120.84555,155,1,NA,155,NA,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T13_Plot1_Deep,T13_Plot1_Deep_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",3,NA,-0.5,Intertidal ,35.33794,-120.84555,193,1,NA,193,180,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T13_Plot2_Deep,T13_Plot2_Deep_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",3,NA,-0.5,Intertidal ,35.33797,-120.84554,163,1,NA,163,312,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T13_Plot3_Deep,T13_Plot3_Deep_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",3,NA,-0.5,Intertidal ,35.33802,-120.84555,155,1,NA,155,202,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T13_Plot1_Deep,T13_Plot1_Deep_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",6,NA,-0.5,Intertidal ,35.33794,-120.84555,193,1,NA,193,375,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T13_Plot2_Deep,T13_Plot2_Deep_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",6,NA,-0.5,Intertidal ,35.33797,-120.84554,163,1,NA,163,410,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T13_Plot3_Deep,T13_Plot3_Deep_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,N. Sandspit donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",6,NA,-0.5,Intertidal ,35.33802,-120.84555,155,1,NA,155,324,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T15_Plot1,T15_Plot1_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Tidelands donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",1,NA,-0.2,Intertidal ,35.3335,-120.84936,221,1,NA,221,178,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T15_Plot2,T15_Plot2_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Tidelands donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",1,NA,-0.2,Intertidal ,35.3332,-120.84939,251,1,NA,251,170,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T15_Plot3,T15_Plot3_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Tidelands donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",1,NA,-0.2,Intertidal ,35.333,-120.84941,236,1,NA,236,206,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T15_Plot1,T15_Plot1_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Tidelands donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",3,NA,-0.2,Intertidal ,35.3335,-120.84936,221,1,NA,221,452,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T15_Plot2,T15_Plot2_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Tidelands donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",3,NA,-0.2,Intertidal ,35.3332,-120.84939,251,1,NA,251,376,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T15_Plot3,T15_Plot3_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Tidelands donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",3,NA,-0.2,Intertidal ,35.333,-120.84941,236,1,NA,236,431,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T15_Plot1,T15_Plot1_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Tidelands donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",6,NA,-0.2,Intertidal ,35.3335,-120.84936,221,1,NA,221,560,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T15_Plot2,T15_Plot2_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Tidelands donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",6,NA,-0.2,Intertidal ,35.3332,-120.84939,251,1,NA,251,499,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T15_Plot3,T15_Plot3_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Tidelands donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",6,NA,-0.2,Intertidal ,35.333,-120.84941,236,1,NA,236,583,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T15_RebarPlot1,T15_RebarPlot1_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Tidelands donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",1,NA,-0.2,Intertidal ,35.33325,-120.84943,80,1,NA,80,85,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T15_RebarPlot2,T15_RebarPlot2_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Tidelands donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",1,NA,-0.2,Intertidal ,35.33323,-120.84945,72,1,NA,72,76,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T15_RebarPlot3,T15_RebarPlot3_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Tidelands donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",1,NA,-0.2,Intertidal ,35.33322,-120.84,70,1,NA,70,67,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T15_RebarPlot1,T15_RebarPlot1_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Tidelands donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",3,NA,-0.2,Intertidal ,35.33325,-120.84943,80,1,NA,80,126,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T15_RebarPlot2,T15_RebarPlot2_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Tidelands donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",3,NA,-0.2,Intertidal ,35.33323,-120.84945,72,1,NA,72,91,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T15_RebarPlot3,T15_RebarPlot3_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Tidelands donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",3,NA,-0.2,Intertidal ,35.33322,-120.84,70,1,NA,70,73,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T15_RebarPlot1,T15_RebarPlot1_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Tidelands donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",6,NA,-0.2,Intertidal ,35.33325,-120.84943,80,1,NA,80,119,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T15_RebarPlot2,T15_RebarPlot2_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Tidelands donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",6,NA,-0.2,Intertidal ,35.33323,-120.84945,72,1,NA,72,105,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T15_RebarPlot3,T15_RebarPlot3_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Tidelands donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",6,NA,-0.2,Intertidal ,35.33322,-120.84,70,1,NA,70,125,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T16_Plot1,T16_Plot1_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Coleman donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",1,NA,1.28,Intertidal ,35.32274,-120.8426,133,1,NA,133,150,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T16_Plot2,T16_Plot2_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Coleman donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",1,NA,1.28,Intertidal ,35.32274,-120.84255,133,1,NA,133,145,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T16_Plot3,T16_Plot3_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Coleman donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",1,NA,1.28,Intertidal ,35.32276,-120.84249,125,1,NA,125,124,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T16_Plot1,T16_Plot1_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Coleman donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",3,NA,1.28,Intertidal ,35.32274,-120.8426,133,1,NA,133,19,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T16_Plot2,T16_Plot2_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Coleman donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",3,NA,1.28,Intertidal ,35.32274,-120.84255,133,1,NA,133,54,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T16_Plot3,T16_Plot3_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Coleman donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",3,NA,1.28,Intertidal ,35.32276,-120.84249,125,1,NA,125,45,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T16_Plot1,T16_Plot1_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Coleman donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",6,NA,1.28,Intertidal ,35.32274,-120.8426,133,1,NA,133,10,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T16_Plot2,T16_Plot2_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Coleman donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",6,NA,1.28,Intertidal ,35.32274,-120.84255,133,1,NA,133,55,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T16_Plot3,T16_Plot3_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Coleman donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",6,NA,1.28,Intertidal ,35.32276,-120.84249,125,1,NA,125,25,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T16_RebarPlot1,T16_RebarPlot1_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Coleman donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",1,NA,1.28,Intertidal ,35.32276,-120.84246,34,1,NA,34,24,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T16_RebarPlot2,T16_RebarPlot2_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Coleman donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",1,NA,1.28,Intertidal ,35.32275,-120.84244,42,1,NA,42,38,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T16_RebarPlot3,T16_RebarPlot3_1mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Coleman donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",1,NA,1.28,Intertidal ,35.32275,-120.84243,45,1,NA,45,27,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T16_RebarPlot1,T16_RebarPlot1_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Coleman donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",3,NA,1.28,Intertidal ,35.32276,-120.84246,34,1,NA,34,1,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T16_RebarPlot2,T16_RebarPlot2_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Coleman donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",3,NA,1.28,Intertidal ,35.32275,-120.84244,42,1,NA,42,0,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T16_RebarPlot3,T16_RebarPlot3_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Coleman donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",3,NA,1.28,Intertidal ,35.32275,-120.84243,45,1,NA,45,2,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T16_RebarPlot1,T16_RebarPlot1_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Coleman donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",6,NA,1.28,Intertidal ,35.32276,-120.84246,34,1,NA,34,0,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T16_RebarPlot2,T16_RebarPlot2_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Coleman donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",6,NA,1.28,Intertidal ,35.32275,-120.84244,42,1,NA,42,0,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2019,T16_RebarPlot3,T16_RebarPlot3_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,Coleman donor meadow,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2019,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 1, 3, 6",6,NA,1.28,Intertidal ,35.32275,-120.84243,45,1,NA,45,0,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T1_Inter_Plot1,T1_Inter_Plot1_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6 ",3,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.35471,-120.84984,161,1,NA,161,183,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T1_Inter_Plot2,T1_Inter_Plot2_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6 ",3,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.35472,-120.84987,172,1,NA,172,118,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T1_Inter_Plot3,T1_Inter_Plot3_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.35476,-120.8499,128,1,NA,128,247,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T1_Inter_Plot4,T1_Inter_Plot4_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.35481,-120.84994,161,1,NA,161,108,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T1_Inter_Plot5,T1_Inter_Plot5_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.35485,-120.84996,134,1,NA,134,160,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T1_Inter_Plot1,T1_Inter_Plot1_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.35471,-120.84984,161,1,NA,161,278,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T1_Inter_Plot2,T1_Inter_Plot2_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.35472,-120.84987,172,1,NA,172,168,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T1_Inter_Plot3,T1_Inter_Plot3_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.35476,-120.8499,128,1,NA,128,464,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T1_Inter_Plot4,T1_Inter_Plot4_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.35481,-120.84994,161,1,NA,161,161,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T1_Inter_Plot5,T1_Inter_Plot5_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.35485,-120.84996,134,1,NA,134,309,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T4_Inter_Plot1,T4_Inter_Plot1_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-0.52,Intertidal ,35.34303,-120.84894,227,1,NA,227,244,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T4_Inter_Plot2,T4_Inter_Plot2_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-0.52,Intertidal ,35.34307,-120.84897,299,1,NA,299,261,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T4_Inter_Plot3,T4_Inter_Plot3_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-0.52,Intertidal ,35.34311,-120.84902,200,1,NA,200,90,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T4_Inter_Plot4,T4_Inter_Plot4_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-0.52,Intertidal ,35.34316,-120.84902,223,1,NA,223,199,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T4_Inter_Plot5,T4_Inter_Plot5_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-0.52,Intertidal ,35.34319,-120.84903,242,1,NA,242,167,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T4_Inter_Plot6,T4_Inter_Plot6_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-0.52,Intertidal ,35.34321,-120.84895,238,1,NA,238,NA,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T4_Inter_Plot1,T4_Inter_Plot1_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-0.52,Intertidal ,35.34303,-120.84894,227,1,NA,227,300,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T4_Inter_Plot2,T4_Inter_Plot2_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-0.52,Intertidal ,35.34307,-120.84897,299,1,NA,299,236,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T4_Inter_Plot3,T4_Inter_Plot3_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-0.52,Intertidal ,35.34311,-120.84902,200,1,NA,200,102,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T4_Inter_Plot4,T4_Inter_Plot4_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-0.52,Intertidal ,35.34316,-120.84902,223,1,NA,223,180,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T4_Inter_Plot5,T4_Inter_Plot5_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-0.52,Intertidal ,35.34319,-120.84903,242,1,NA,242,245,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T4_Inter_Plot6,T4_Inter_Plot6_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-0.52,Intertidal ,35.34321,-120.84895,238,1,NA,238,223,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T8_Inter_Plot1,T8_Inter_Plot1_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.34883,-120.8476,92,1,NA,92,133,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T8_Inter_Plot2,T8_Inter_Plot2_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.34881,-120.84763,93,1,NA,93,299,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T8_Inter_Plot3,T8_Inter_Plot3_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.34878,-120.84767,98,1,NA,98,214,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T8_Inter_Plot4,T8_Inter_Plot4_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.34875,-120.84769,88,1,NA,88,275,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T8_Inter_Plot5,T8_Inter_Plot5_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.3487,-120.84773,90,1,NA,90,190,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T8_Inter_Plot1,T8_Inter_Plot1_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.34883,-120.8476,92,1,NA,92,616,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T8_Inter_Plot2,T8_Inter_Plot2_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.34881,-120.84763,93,1,NA,93,724,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T8_Inter_Plot3,T8_Inter_Plot3_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.34878,-120.84767,98,1,NA,98,691,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T8_Inter_Plot4,T8_Inter_Plot4_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.34875,-120.84769,88,1,NA,88,888,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T8_Inter_Plot5,T8_Inter_Plot5_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-0.4,Intertidal ,35.3487,-120.84773,90,1,NA,90,504,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T11_Inter_Plot1,T11_Inter_Plot1_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-0.6,Intertidal ,35.33928,-120.84737,239,1,NA,239,80,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T11_Inter_Plot2,T11_Inter_Plot2_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-0.6,Intertidal ,35.33926,-120.84733,214,1,NA,214,567,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T11_Inter_Plot3,T11_Inter_Plot3_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-0.6,Intertidal ,35.33926,-120.840727,237,1,NA,237,302,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T11_Inter_Plot4,T11_Inter_Plot4_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-0.6,Intertidal ,35.3392,-120.8473,197,1,NA,197,271,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T11_Inter_Plot5,T11_Inter_Plot5_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-0.6,Intertidal ,35.33917,-120.84729,249,1,NA,249,330,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T11_Inter_Plot1,T11_Inter_Plot1_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-0.6,Intertidal ,35.33928,-120.84737,239,1,NA,239,147,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T11_Inter_Plot2,T11_Inter_Plot2_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-0.6,Intertidal ,35.33926,-120.84733,214,1,NA,214,656,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T11_Inter_Plot3,T11_Inter_Plot3_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-0.6,Intertidal ,35.33926,-120.840727,237,1,NA,237,230,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T11_Inter_Plot4,T11_Inter_Plot4_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-0.6,Intertidal ,35.3392,-120.8473,197,1,NA,197,186,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T11_Inter_Plot5,T11_Inter_Plot5_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,March,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-0.6,Intertidal ,35.33917,-120.84729,249,1,NA,249,302,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T17_Rebar_Plot1,T17_Rebar_Plot1_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-0.07,Intertidal ,35.33816,-120.85264,51,1,NA,51,59,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T17_Rebar_Plot2,T17_Rebar_Plot2_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-0.07,Intertidal ,35.33816,-120.85264,56,1,NA,56,48,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T17_Rebar_Plot3,T17_Rebar_Plot3_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-0.07,Intertidal ,35.33816,-120.85264,53,1,NA,53,43,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T17_Rebar_Plot1,T17_Rebar_Plot1_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-0.07,Intertidal ,35.33816,-120.85264,51,1,NA,51,406,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T17_Rebar_Plot2,T17_Rebar_Plot2_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-0.07,Intertidal ,35.33816,-120.85264,56,1,NA,56,290,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T17_Rebar_Plot3,T17_Rebar_Plot3_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-0.07,Intertidal ,35.33816,-120.85264,53,1,NA,53,347,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T17_Bamboo_Plot1,T17_Bamboo_Plot1_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-0.07,Intertidal ,35.33816,-120.85264,45,1,NA,45,83,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T17_Bamboo_Plot2,T17_Bamboo_Plot2_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-0.07,Intertidal ,35.33816,-120.85264,59,1,NA,59,55,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T17_Bamboo_Plot3,T17_Bamboo_Plot3_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-0.07,Intertidal ,35.33816,-120.85264,60,1,NA,60,52,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T17_Bamboo_Plot1,T17_Bamboo_Plot1_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-0.07,Intertidal ,35.33816,-120.85264,45,1,NA,45,395,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T17_Bamboo_Plot2,T17_Bamboo_Plot2_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-0.07,Intertidal ,35.33816,-120.85264,59,1,NA,59,331,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T17_Bamboo_Plot3,T17_Bamboo_Plot3_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-0.07,Intertidal ,35.33816,-120.85264,60,1,NA,60,542,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T18_Rebar_Plot1,T18_Rebar_Plot1_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-0.11,Intertidal ,35.33638,-120.85051,48,1,NA,48,79,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T18_Rebar_Plot2,T18_Rebar_Plot2_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-0.11,Intertidal ,35.33638,-120.85051,39,1,NA,39,81,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T18_Rebar_Plot3,T18_Rebar_Plot3_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-0.11,Intertidal ,35.33638,-120.85051,46,1,NA,46,85,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T18_Rebar_Plot1,T18_Rebar_Plot1_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-0.11,Intertidal ,35.33638,-120.85051,48,1,NA,48,96,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T18_Rebar_Plot2,T18_Rebar_Plot2_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-0.11,Intertidal ,35.33638,-120.85051,39,1,NA,39,184,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T18_Rebar_Plot3,T18_Rebar_Plot3_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-0.11,Intertidal ,35.33638,-120.85051,46,1,NA,46,107,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T18_Bamboo_Plot1,T18_Bamboo_Plot1_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-0.11,Intertidal ,35.33638,-120.85051,59,1,NA,59,65,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T18_Bamboo_Plot2,T18_Bamboo_Plot2_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-0.11,Intertidal ,35.33638,-120.85051,47,1,NA,47,75,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T18_Bamboo_Plot3,T18_Bamboo_Plot3_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-0.11,Intertidal ,35.33638,-120.85051,48,1,NA,48,67,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T18_Bamboo_Plot1,T18_Bamboo_Plot1_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-0.11,Intertidal ,35.33638,-120.85051,59,1,NA,59,176,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T18_Bamboo_Plot2,T18_Bamboo_Plot2_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-0.11,Intertidal ,35.33638,-120.85051,47,1,NA,47,140,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T18_Bamboo_Plot3,T18_Bamboo_Plot3_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-0.11,Intertidal ,35.33638,-120.85051,48,1,NA,48,70,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T19_Rebar_Plot1,T19_Rebar_Plot1_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-0.08,Intertidal ,35.33537,-120.85387,62,1,NA,62,64,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T19_Rebar_Plot2,T19_Rebar_Plot2_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-0.08,Intertidal ,35.33537,-120.85387,67,1,NA,67,67,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T19_Rebar_Plot3,T19_Rebar_Plot3_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-0.08,Intertidal ,35.33537,-120.85387,53,1,NA,53,55,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T19_Rebar_Plot1,T19_Rebar_Plot1_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-0.08,Intertidal ,35.33537,-120.85387,62,1,NA,62,186,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T19_Rebar_Plot2,T19_Rebar_Plot2_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-0.08,Intertidal ,35.33537,-120.85387,67,1,NA,67,123,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T19_Rebar_Plot3,T19_Rebar_Plot3_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-0.08,Intertidal ,35.33537,-120.85387,53,1,NA,53,98,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T19_Bamboo_Plot1,T19_Bamboo_Plot1_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-0.08,Intertidal ,35.33537,-120.85387,47,1,NA,47,59,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T19_Bamboo_Plot2,T19_Bamboo_Plot2_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-0.08,Intertidal ,35.33537,-120.85387,46,1,NA,46,52,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T19_Bamboo_Plot3,T19_Bamboo_Plot3_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-0.08,Intertidal ,35.33537,-120.85387,43,1,NA,43,61,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T19_Bamboo_Plot1,T19_Bamboo_Plot1_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-0.08,Intertidal ,35.33537,-120.85387,47,1,NA,47,228,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T19_Bamboo_Plot2,T19_Bamboo_Plot2_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-0.08,Intertidal ,35.33537,-120.85387,46,1,NA,46,171,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T19_Bamboo_Plot3,T19_Bamboo_Plot3_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-0.08,Intertidal ,35.33537,-120.85387,43,1,NA,43,283,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T20_Rebar_Plot1,T20_Rebar_Plot1_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-0.17,Intertidal ,35.33365,-120.85208,50,1,NA,50,85,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T20_Rebar_Plot2,T20_Rebar_Plot2_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-0.17,Intertidal ,35.33365,-120.85208,48,1,NA,48,87,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T20_Rebar_Plot3,T20_Rebar_Plot3_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-0.17,Intertidal ,35.33365,-120.85208,53,1,NA,53,88,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T20_Rebar_Plot1,T20_Rebar_Plot1_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-0.17,Intertidal ,35.33365,-120.85208,50,1,NA,50,355,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T20_Rebar_Plot2,T20_Rebar_Plot2_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-0.17,Intertidal ,35.33365,-120.85208,48,1,NA,48,284,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T20_Rebar_Plot3,T20_Rebar_Plot3_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-0.17,Intertidal ,35.33365,-120.85208,53,1,NA,53,306,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T20_Bamboo_Plot1,T20_Bamboo_Plot1_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-0.17,Intertidal ,35.33365,-120.85208,44,1,NA,44,38,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T20_Bamboo_Plot2,T20_Bamboo_Plot2_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-0.17,Intertidal ,35.33365,-120.85208,45,1,NA,45,37,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T20_Bamboo_Plot3,T20_Bamboo_Plot3_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-0.17,Intertidal ,35.33365,-120.85208,53,1,NA,53,55,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T20_Bamboo_Plot1,T20_Bamboo_Plot1_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-0.17,Intertidal ,35.33365,-120.85208,44,1,NA,44,138,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T20_Bamboo_Plot2,T20_Bamboo_Plot2_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-0.17,Intertidal ,35.33365,-120.85208,45,1,NA,45,162,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T20_Bamboo_Plot3,T20_Bamboo_Plot3_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-0.17,Intertidal ,35.33365,-120.85208,53,1,NA,53,188,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T21_Unanch_Plot1,T21_Unanch_Plot1_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Unanchored,"Just stuck rhizome straight into sediment, no anchor at all.","This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-0.43,Intertidal ,35.34516,-120.84856,110,1,NA,110,209,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T21_Anch_Plot2,T21_Anch_Plot2_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-0.43,Intertidal ,35.3451,-120.84867,89,1,NA,89,258,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T21_Unanch_Plot3,T21_Unanch_Plot3_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Unanchored,"Just stuck rhizome straight into sediment, no anchor at all.","This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-0.43,Intertidal ,35.34521,-120.84557,104,1,NA,104,140,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T21_Anch_Plot4,T21_Anch_Plot4_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-0.43,Intertidal ,35.34525,-120.84853,96,1,NA,96,294,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T21_Unanch_Plot5,T21_Unanch_Plot5_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Unanchored,"Just stuck rhizome straight into sediment, no anchor at all.","This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-0.43,Intertidal ,35.34533,-120.84852,97,1,NA,97,172,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T21_Unanch_Plot6,T21_Unanch_Plot6_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Unanchored,"Just stuck rhizome straight into sediment, no anchor at all.","This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-0.43,Intertidal ,35.34533,-120.84853,99.2,1,NA,99.2,121,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T21_Unanch_Plot1,T21_Unanch_Plot1_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Unanchored,"Just stuck rhizome straight into sediment, no anchor at all.","This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-0.43,Intertidal ,35.34516,-120.84856,110,1,NA,110,306,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T21_Anch_Plot2,T21_Anch_Plot2_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-0.43,Intertidal ,35.3451,-120.84867,89,1,NA,89,343,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T21_Unanch_Plot3,T21_Unanch_Plot3_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Unanchored,"Just stuck rhizome straight into sediment, no anchor at all.","This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-0.43,Intertidal ,35.34521,-120.84557,104,1,NA,104,125,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T21_Anch_Plot4,T21_Anch_Plot4_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-0.43,Intertidal ,35.34525,-120.84853,96,1,NA,96,339,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T21_Unanch_Plot5,T21_Unanch_Plot5_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Unanchored,"Just stuck rhizome straight into sediment, no anchor at all.","This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-0.43,Intertidal ,35.34533,-120.84852,97,1,NA,97,151,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T21_Unanch_Plot6,T21_Unanch_Plot6_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Unanchored,"Just stuck rhizome straight into sediment, no anchor at all.","This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,February,Winter,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-0.43,Intertidal ,35.34533,-120.84853,99.2,1,NA,99.2,150,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T1_Sub_Plot1,T1_Sub_Plot1_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,April ,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-1.76,Subtidal,35.35476,-120.84951,42,0.25,NA,42,39,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T1_Sub_Plot2,T1_Sub_Plot2_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,April ,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-1.76,Subtidal,35.35476,-120.84951,40,0.25,NA,40,83,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T1_Sub_Plot3,T1_Sub_Plot3_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,April ,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-1.76,Subtidal,35.35476,-120.84951,47,0.25,NA,47,52,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T1_Sub_Plot4,T1_Sub_Plot4_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,April ,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-1.76,Subtidal,35.35476,-120.84951,40,0.25,NA,40,42,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T1_Sub_Rebar_Plot1,T1_Sub_Rebar_Plot1_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,April ,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-1.76,Subtidal,35.35476,-120.84951,47,0.25,NA,47,51,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T1_Sub_Rebar_Plot2,T1_Sub_Rebar_Plot2_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,April ,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-1.76,Subtidal,35.35476,-120.84951,37,0.25,NA,37,56,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T1_Sub_Rebar_Plot3,T1_Sub_Rebar_Plot3_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,April,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-1.76,Subtidal,35.35476,-120.84951,38,0.25,NA,38,43,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T1_Sub_Rebar_Plot4,T1_Sub_Rebar_Plot4_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,April,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-1.76,Subtidal,35.35476,-120.84951,43,0.25,NA,43,61,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T1_Sub_Bamboo_Plot1,T1_Sub_Bamboo_Plot1_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,April,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-1.76,Subtidal,35.35476,-120.84951,48,0.25,NA,48,61,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T1_Sub_Bamboo_Plot2,T1_Sub_Bamboo_Plot2_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,April,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-1.76,Subtidal,35.35476,-120.84951,51,0.25,NA,51,57,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T1_Sub_Bamboo_Plot3,T1_Sub_Bamboo_Plot3_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,April,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-1.76,Subtidal,35.35476,-120.84951,40,0.25,NA,40,63,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T1_Sub_Bamboo_Plot4,T1_Sub_Bamboo_Plot4_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,April,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-1.76,Subtidal,35.35476,-120.84951,41,0.25,NA,41,77,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T1_Sub_Plot1,T1_Sub_Plot1_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,April,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-1.76,Subtidal,35.35476,-120.84951,42,0.25,0.25,42,67,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T1_Sub_Plot2,T1_Sub_Plot2_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,April,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-1.76,Subtidal,35.35476,-120.84951,40,0.25,0.5,40,NA,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T1_Sub_Plot3,T1_Sub_Plot3_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,April,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-1.76,Subtidal,35.35476,-120.84951,47,0.25,0.5,47,106,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T1_Sub_Plot4,T1_Sub_Plot4_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,April,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-1.76,Subtidal,35.35476,-120.84951,40,0.25,1,40,NA,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T1_Sub_Rebar_Plot1,T1_Sub_Rebar_Plot1_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,April,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-1.76,Subtidal,35.35476,-120.84951,47,0.25,0.5,47,NA,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T1_Sub_Rebar_Plot2,T1_Sub_Rebar_Plot2_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,April,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-1.76,Subtidal,35.35476,-120.84951,37,0.25,1,37,93,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T1_Sub_Rebar_Plot3,T1_Sub_Rebar_Plot3_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,April,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-1.76,Subtidal,35.35476,-120.84951,38,0.25,1,38,NA,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T1_Sub_Rebar_Plot4,T1_Sub_Rebar_Plot4_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,April,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-1.76,Subtidal,35.35476,-120.84951,43,0.25,1.875,43,146,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T1_Sub_Bamboo_Plot1,T1_Sub_Bamboo_Plot1_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,April,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-1.76,Subtidal,35.35476,-120.84951,48,0.25,0.5625,48,245,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T1_Sub_Bamboo_Plot2,T1_Sub_Bamboo_Plot2_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,April,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-1.76,Subtidal,35.35476,-120.84951,51,0.25,1.5,51,NA,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T1_Sub_Bamboo_Plot3,T1_Sub_Bamboo_Plot3_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,April,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-1.76,Subtidal,35.35476,-120.84951,40,0.25,1.25,40,194,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T1_Sub_Bamboo_Plot4,T1_Sub_Bamboo_Plot4_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,April,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-1.76,Subtidal,35.35476,-120.84951,41,0.25,1.5,41,NA,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T11_Sub_Plot1,T11_Sub_Plot1_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,April,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-1.66,Subtidal,35.33936,-120.8472,38,0.25,NA,38,72,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T11_Sub_Plot2,T11_Sub_Plot2_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,April,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-1.66,Subtidal,35.33936,-120.8472,40,0.25,NA,40,69,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T11_Sub_Plot3,T11_Sub_Plot3_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,April,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-1.66,Subtidal,35.33936,-120.8472,38,0.25,NA,38,90,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T11_Sub_Plot4,T11_Sub_Plot4_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,April,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-1.66,Subtidal,35.33936,-120.8472,36,0.25,NA,36,84,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T11_Sub_Rebar_Plot1,T11_Sub_Rebar_Plot1_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,April,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-1.66,Subtidal,35.33936,-120.8472,36,0.25,NA,36,90,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T11_Sub_Rebar_Plot2,T11_Sub_Rebar_Plot2_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,April,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-1.66,Subtidal,35.33936,-120.8472,33,0.25,NA,33,85,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T11_Sub_Rebar_Plot3,T11_Sub_Rebar_Plot3_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,April,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-1.66,Subtidal,35.33936,-120.8472,43,0.25,NA,43,73,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T11_Sub_Rebar_Plot4,T11_Sub_Rebar_Plot4_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,April,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-1.66,Subtidal,35.33936,-120.8472,34,0.25,NA,34,79,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T11_Sub_Bamboo_Plot1,T11_Sub_Bamboo_Plot1_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,April,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-1.66,Subtidal,35.33936,-120.8472,40,0.25,NA,40,115,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T11_Sub_Bamboo_Plot2,T11_Sub_Bamboo_Plot2_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,April,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-1.66,Subtidal,35.33936,-120.8472,43,0.25,NA,43,87,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T11_Sub_Bamboo_Plot3,T11_Sub_Bamboo_Plot3_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,April,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-1.66,Subtidal,35.33936,-120.8472,40,0.25,NA,40,35,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T11_Sub_Bamboo_Plot4,T11_Sub_Bamboo_Plot4_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,April,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-1.66,Subtidal,35.33936,-120.8472,42,0.25,NA,42,92,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T11_Sub_Plot1,T11_Sub_Plot1_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,April,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-1.66,Subtidal,35.33936,-120.8472,38,0.25,NA,38,384,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T11_Sub_Plot2,T11_Sub_Plot2_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,April,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-1.66,Subtidal,35.33936,-120.8472,40,0.25,3,40,NA,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T11_Sub_Plot3,T11_Sub_Plot3_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,April,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-1.66,Subtidal,35.33936,-120.8472,38,0.25,1.5,38,NA,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T11_Sub_Plot4,T11_Sub_Plot4_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,April,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-1.66,Subtidal,35.33936,-120.8472,36,0.25,3,36,220,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T11_Sub_Rebar_Plot1,T11_Sub_Rebar_Plot1_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,April,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-1.66,Subtidal,35.33936,-120.8472,36,0.25,1,36,98,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T11_Sub_Rebar_Plot2,T11_Sub_Rebar_Plot2_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,April,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-1.66,Subtidal,35.33936,-120.8472,33,0.25,1.5,33,NA,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T11_Sub_Rebar_Plot3,T11_Sub_Rebar_Plot3_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,April,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-1.66,Subtidal,35.33936,-120.8472,43,0.25,1.5,43,NA,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T11_Sub_Rebar_Plot4,T11_Sub_Rebar_Plot4_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,April,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-1.66,Subtidal,35.33936,-120.8472,34,0.25,1.5,34,148,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T11_Sub_Bamboo_Plot1,T11_Sub_Bamboo_Plot1_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,April,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-1.66,Subtidal,35.33936,-120.8472,40,0.25,2.25,40,NA,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T11_Sub_Bamboo_Plot2,T11_Sub_Bamboo_Plot2_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,April,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-1.66,Subtidal,35.33936,-120.8472,43,0.25,1.5,43,154,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T11_Sub_Bamboo_Plot3,T11_Sub_Bamboo_Plot3_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,April,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-1.66,Subtidal,35.33936,-120.8472,40,0.25,0.75,40,NA,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T11_Sub_Bamboo_Plot4,T11_Sub_Bamboo_Plot4_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,April,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-1.66,Subtidal,35.33936,-120.8472,42,0.25,0.75,42,195,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T13_Sub_Plot1,T13_Sub_Plot1_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,May,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-2,Subtidal,35.33824,-120.84562,46,0.25,NA,46,74,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T13_Sub_Plot2,T13_Sub_Plot2_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,May,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-2,Subtidal,35.33824,-120.84562,44,0.25,NA,44,99,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T13_Sub_Plot3,T13_Sub_Plot3_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,May,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-2,Subtidal,35.33824,-120.84562,49,0.25,NA,49,124,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T13_Sub_Plot4,T13_Sub_Plot4_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,May,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-2,Subtidal,35.33824,-120.84562,44,0.25,NA,44,121,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T13_Sub_Rebar_Plot1,T13_Sub_Rebar_Plot1_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,May,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-2,Subtidal,35.33824,-120.84562,54,0.25,NA,54,132,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T13_Sub_Rebar_Plot2,T13_Sub_Rebar_Plot2_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,May,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-2,Subtidal,35.33824,-120.84562,30,0.25,NA,30,103,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T13_Sub_Rebar_Plot3,T13_Sub_Rebar_Plot3_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,May,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-2,Subtidal,35.33824,-120.84562,47,0.25,NA,47,81,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T13_Sub_Rebar_Plot4,T13_Sub_Rebar_Plot4_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,May,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-2,Subtidal,35.33824,-120.84562,44,0.25,NA,44,87,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T13_Sub_Bamboo_Plot1,T13_Sub_Bamboo_Plot1_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,May,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-2,Subtidal,35.33824,-120.84562,50,0.25,NA,50,97,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T13_Sub_Bamboo_Plot2,T13_Sub_Bamboo_Plot2_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,May,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-2,Subtidal,35.33824,-120.84562,45,0.25,NA,45,145,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T13_Sub_Bamboo_Plot3,T13_Sub_Bamboo_Plot3_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,May,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-2,Subtidal,35.33824,-120.84562,55,0.25,NA,55,88,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T13_Sub_Bamboo_Plot4,T13_Sub_Bamboo_Plot4_3mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,May,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",3,NA,-2,Subtidal,35.33824,-120.84562,49,0.25,NA,49,215,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T13_Sub_Plot1,T13_Sub_Plot1_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,May,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-2,Subtidal,35.33824,-120.84562,46,0.25,NA,46,164,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T13_Sub_Plot2,T13_Sub_Plot2_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,May,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-2,Subtidal,35.33824,-120.84562,44,0.25,NA,44,NA,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T13_Sub_Plot3,T13_Sub_Plot3_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,May,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-2,Subtidal,35.33824,-120.84562,49,0.25,NA,49,NA,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T13_Sub_Plot4,T13_Sub_Plot4_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,May,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-2,Subtidal,35.33824,-120.84562,44,0.25,NA,44,157,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T13_Sub_Rebar_Plot1,T13_Sub_Rebar_Plot1_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,May,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-2,Subtidal,35.33824,-120.84562,54,0.25,2.25,54,179,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T13_Sub_Rebar_Plot2,T13_Sub_Rebar_Plot2_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,May,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-2,Subtidal,35.33824,-120.84562,30,0.25,2,30,NA,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T13_Sub_Rebar_Plot3,T13_Sub_Rebar_Plot3_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,May,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-2,Subtidal,35.33824,-120.84562,47,0.25,1.5,47,113,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T13_Sub_Rebar_Plot4,T13_Sub_Rebar_Plot4_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,May,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-2,Subtidal,35.33824,-120.84562,44,0.25,1.5,44,NA,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T13_Sub_Bamboo_Plot1,T13_Sub_Bamboo_Plot1_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,May,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-2,Subtidal,35.33824,-120.84562,50,0.25,1.5,50,168,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T13_Sub_Bamboo_Plot2,T13_Sub_Bamboo_Plot2_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,May,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-2,Subtidal,35.33824,-120.84562,45,0.25,1,45,NA,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T13_Sub_Bamboo_Plot3,T13_Sub_Bamboo_Plot3_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,May,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-2,Subtidal,35.33824,-120.84562,55,0.25,1.5,55,164,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBNEP_2020,T13_Sub_Bamboo_Plot4,T13_Sub_Bamboo_Plot4_6mo,Raw data,MBNEP,Morro Bay,ND,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,NA,"This is all based on raw data received directly from Carolyn, so lacking in external details. See interview for additional info. ",N,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,No reference meadow,2020,May,Spring,0.5,"Months 3, 6",6,NA,-2,Subtidal,35.33824,-120.84562,49,0.25,4,49,NA,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,Did report % ulva and % gracilaria per plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MorroBay_MaintenanceDredging,Morro_Dredge_Plot1of1,Morro_Dredge_Plot1of1_6mo,Grey literature,Merkel,Morro Bay,Morro Bay,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,ND,Mitigation,Active,NA,None Reported,"They created their restoration site by excavating an unvegetated intertidal sand flat. This and planting depth was based off of extensive bathymetric surveys. They may have used the ELVS model (I know Merkel had it at this time), but can't get access to the methods becuase the report can't be tracked down (Methods cited in Merkel 2010b). ",They created their restoration site by excavating an unvegetated intertidal sand flat. Used biodegradable soft anchors. ,Y,"2 donor beds nearby, one towards the mouth, another towards the back of the bay. Both relatively close by. Less than 10% of donor beds were harvested. These are also right next to the reference sites (Called Coleman Beach and A1 anchorage)",5795,4777,91.7,39.2,94.4,29.2,NA,NA,"They used two, but then average data between them. The averaged data are reported here. The initial ref bed densities was actually from 3 months after the transplant. ",2010,July,Summer,5,"Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",6,2.4,0 to -1.6 MLLW,0 to -1.6 MLLW,NA,NA,"33,504 to 55,840",9712.46,5341.85,102.5,134.4,40.3,ND,NA,None (70% areal coverage minimum and 30% density achieved aftter first year). Ititial transplated shoot density is actually the 3mo marker. Should probably discard. ,Y,Y,5584 total units planted with 6-10 shoots each. ,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MorroBay_MaintenanceDredging,Morro_Dredge_Plot1of1,Morro_Dredge_Plot1of1_12mo,Grey literature,Merkel,Morro Bay,Morro Bay,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,ND,Mitigation,Active,NA,None Reported,"They created their restoration site by excavating an unvegetated intertidal sand flat. This and planting depth was based off of extensive bathymetric surveys. They may have used the ELVS model (I know Merkel had it at this time), but can't get access to the methods becuase the report can't be tracked down (Methods cited in Merkel 2010b). ",They created their restoration site by excavating an unvegetated intertidal sand flat. Used biodegradable soft anchors. ,Y,"2 donor beds nearby, one towards the mouth, another towards the back of the bay. Both relatively close by. Less than 10% of donor beds were harvested. These are also right next to the reference sites (Called Coleman Beach and A1 anchorage)",5795,5382,91.7,39.2,117.8,58.9,NA,NA,"They used two, but then average data between them. The averaged data are reported here. The initial ref bed densities was actually from 3 months after the transplant. ",2010,July,Summer,5,"Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",12,2.4,0 to -1.6 MLLW,0 to -1.6 MLLW,NA,NA,"33,504 to 55,840",9712.46,5179.976,102.5,137.6,49.9,ND,NA,"70% areal coverage minimum and 30% density achieved aftter first year. They say they met this criteria, but only because they over planted (see mitigation ratio). If they had planted 1:1, or even 1.2:1, they would have failed.  Ititial transplated shoot density is actually the 3mo marker. Should probably discard. ",Y,Y,5584 total units planted with 6-10 shoots each. ,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MorroBay_MaintenanceDredging,Morro_Dredge_Plot1of1,Morro_Dredge_Plot1of1_Xmo,Grey literature,Merkel,Morro Bay,Morro Bay,35.37,-120.86,C. Cal,ND,ND,Mitigation,Active,NA,None Reported,"They created their restoration site by excavating an unvegetated intertidal sand flat. This and planting depth was based off of extensive bathymetric surveys. They may have used the ELVS model (I know Merkel had it at this time), but can't get access to the methods becuase the report can't be tracked down (Methods cited in Merkel 2010b). ",They created their restoration site by excavating an unvegetated intertidal sand flat. Used biodegradable soft anchors. ,Y,"2 donor beds nearby, one towards the mouth, another towards the back of the bay. Both relatively close by. Less than 10% of donor beds were harvested. These are also right next to the reference sites (Called Coleman Beach and A1 anchorage)",5795,2798,91.7,39.2,184.4,88.1,NA,NA,"They used two, but then average data between them. The averaged data are reported here. The initial ref bed densities was actually from 3 months after the transplant. ",2010,July,Summer,5,"Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",ND,2.4,0 to -1.6 MLLW,0 to -1.6 MLLW,NA,NA,"33,504 to 55,840",9712.46,4815.759,102.5,365.6,149.9,ND,NA,"100% areal coverage minimum and 85% density achieved by yrs 3+. They say they met this criteria, but only because they over planted (see mitigation ratio) and also made more transplants into the mitigation area in yr 3 (still only montitored until the original yr 5 after). If they had planted 1:1, or even 1.2:1, they would have failed had they not adjusted their areal requirement based on similar losses seen in the reference beds. ",Y,Y,"5584 total units planted with 6-10 shoots each. Additionally, there were new losses in eelgrass during the project. The initial needed areas for mitigation was 1.2 acres, which then bumped up to 1.74. They still over restored (2.4), but makes success criteria harder. After the 3 year mark, their restoration was not meeting mitigaiton criteria, so they planted more shoots in the gaps of thier site in year 3 (see Fig. 2). ""A total of2,187 planting units from Coleman Beach donor sites were planted into gaps within the beds in the original 2.4 acre mitigation site(Figure 2). In addition, 2,000 additional planting units were planted into 10 central bay pilot plots. This September 2012 transplant was documented in the supplemental transplant report (Merkel & Associates 2013b)"". Also- Note, Ititial transplated shoot density is actually the 3mo marker. Should probably discard. ",Y,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,N,"Note the presenting of wasting disease in their restored medows, and also in Morro Bay at large. They ascribe losses at least in part (both in the mitigation meadow and natural) to this disease. They only state that macroalgae was perhaps leading to loss of eelgrass by creating gaps (ulva, enteromorpha, garcilaria, porphyra). Similar gap creatin with sand dollars. ",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
PortOfLA_Pier300_EelgrassMitigationProject,PortOfLAPier300_Plot1of1,PortOfLA_Pier300_6mo,Grey literature,Merkel,LA Harbor,Pier 300,33.74,-118.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,"Used biodegradable, soft anchors - 'cotton line collar and pliable paper anchor'. 8-10 shoots per bundle","Created thier restoration area by make a submerged rock dike, filling it with dredge material to make the dept -5 to -2 MLLW, then tranplanted within this area. ",Y,"Singe ref bed, donor bed in two locations. ",21853,ND,23.2,34.2,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Didn't start monitoring the reference meadow until 6 mo after restoration, so this data was used as the 'initial are and shoot density' point. ",2003,May-August,Summer,7,"Months 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84",6,1.2,-2 to -5 ft MLLW,-2 to -5 ft MLLW,NA,NA,ND,54999,48929,1,53,47,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,"Did not meet areal success criteria at the 36mo mark, so planted more at the 48 mo mark., which is why they monitored for so long",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
PortOfLA_Pier300_EelgrassMitigationProject,PortOfLAPier300_Plot1of1,PortOfLA_Pier300_12mo,Grey literature,Merkel,LA Harbor,Pier 300,33.74,-118.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,"Used biodegradable, soft anchors - 'cotton line collar and pliable paper anchor'. 8-10 shoots per bundle","Created thier restoration area by make a submerged rock dike, filling it with dredge material to make the dept -5 to -2 MLLW, then tranplanted within this area. ",Y,"Singe ref bed, donor bed in two locations. ",21853,20841.31,23.2,34.2,78.4,29.7,NA,NA,"Didn't start monitoring the reference meadow until 6 mo after restoration, so this data was used as the 'initial are and shoot density' point. ",2003,May-August,Summer,7,"Months 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84",12,1.2,-2 to -5 ft MLLW,-2 to -5 ft MLLW,NA,NA,ND,54999,57158,1,146,46,ND,NA,"70% areal coverage, 30% density",Y,Y,"Did not meet areal success criteria at the 36mo mark, so planted more at the 48 mo mark., which is why they monitored for so long",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
PortOfLA_Pier300_EelgrassMitigationProject,PortOfLAPier300_Plot1of1,PortOfLA_Pier300_24mo,Grey literature,Merkel,LA Harbor,Pier 300,33.74,-118.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,"Used biodegradable, soft anchors - 'cotton line collar and pliable paper anchor'. 8-10 shoots per bundle","Created thier restoration area by make a submerged rock dike, filling it with dredge material to make the dept -5 to -2 MLLW, then tranplanted within this area. ",Y,"Singe ref bed, donor bed in two locations. ",21853,13691,23.2,34.2,62,40,NA,NA,"Didn't start monitoring the reference meadow until 6 mo after restoration, so this data was used as the 'initial are and shoot density' point. ",2003,May-August,Summer,7,"Months 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84",24,1.2,-2 to -5 ft MLLW,-2 to -5 ft MLLW,NA,NA,ND,54999,59277,1,123,64,ND,NA,"85% areal coverage, 70% density",Y,Y,"Did not meet areal success criteria at the 36mo mark, so planted more at the 48 mo mark., which is why they monitored for so long",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
PortOfLA_Pier300_EelgrassMitigationProject,PortOfLAPier300_Plot1of1,PortOfLA_Pier300_36mo,Grey literature,Merkel,LA Harbor,Pier 300,33.74,-118.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,"Used biodegradable, soft anchors - 'cotton line collar and pliable paper anchor'. 8-10 shoots per bundle","Created thier restoration area by make a submerged rock dike, filling it with dredge material to make the dept -5 to -2 MLLW, then tranplanted within this area. ",Y,"Singe ref bed, donor bed in two locations. ",21853,14650,23.2,34.2,41,35,NA,NA,"Didn't start monitoring the reference meadow until 6 mo after restoration, so this data was used as the 'initial are and shoot density' point. ",2003,May-August,Summer,7,"Months 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84",36,1.2,-2 to -5 ft MLLW,-2 to -5 ft MLLW,NA,NA,ND,54999,51169,1,126,97,ND,NA,"100% areal coverage, 85% density",N,Y,"Did not meet areal success criteria at the 36mo mark, so planted more at the 48 mo mark., which is why they monitored for so long",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
PortOfLA_Pier300_EelgrassMitigationProject,PortOfLAPier300_Plot1of1,PortOfLA_Pier300_48mo,Grey literature,Merkel,LA Harbor,Pier 300,33.74,-118.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,"Used biodegradable, soft anchors - 'cotton line collar and pliable paper anchor'. 8-10 shoots per bundle","Created thier restoration area by make a submerged rock dike, filling it with dredge material to make the dept -5 to -2 MLLW, then tranplanted within this area. ",Y,"Singe ref bed, donor bed in two locations. ",21853,5777,23.2,34.2,49,41,NA,NA,"Didn't start monitoring the reference meadow until 6 mo after restoration, so this data was used as the 'initial are and shoot density' point. ",2003,May-August,Summer,7,"Months 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84",48,1.2,-2 to -5 ft MLLW,-2 to -5 ft MLLW,NA,NA,ND,54999,59893,1,92,84,ND,NA,"100% areal coverage, 85% density",Y,Y,"Did not meet areal success criteria at the 36mo mark, so planted more at the 48 mo mark., which is why they monitored for so long",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
PortOfLA_Pier300_EelgrassMitigationProject,PortOfLAPier300_Plot1of1,PortOfLA_Pier300_60mo,Grey literature,Merkel,LA Harbor,Pier 300,33.74,-118.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,"Used biodegradable, soft anchors - 'cotton line collar and pliable paper anchor'. 8-10 shoots per bundle","Created thier restoration area by make a submerged rock dike, filling it with dredge material to make the dept -5 to -2 MLLW, then tranplanted within this area. ",Y,"Singe ref bed, donor bed in two locations. ",21853,3564,23.2,34.2,40,45.4,NA,NA,"Didn't start monitoring the reference meadow until 6 mo after restoration, so this data was used as the 'initial are and shoot density' point. ",2003,May-August,Summer,7,"Months 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84",60,1.2,-2 to -5 ft MLLW,-2 to -5 ft MLLW,NA,NA,ND,54999,56511,1,110,83,ND,NA,"100% areal coverage, 85% density",Y,Y,"Did not meet areal success criteria at the 36mo mark, so planted more at the 48 mo mark., which is why they monitored for so long. They were .02 below the mitigation vriteria at this 60 mo mark, but deemed this within mapping area error, so did not provide supplemental transplants again. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
PortOfLA_Pier300_EelgrassMitigationProject,PortOfLAPier300_Plot1of1,PortOfLA_Pier300_72mo,Grey literature,Merkel,LA Harbor,Pier 300,33.74,-118.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,"Used biodegradable, soft anchors - 'cotton line collar and pliable paper anchor'. 8-10 shoots per bundle","Created thier restoration area by make a submerged rock dike, filling it with dredge material to make the dept -5 to -2 MLLW, then tranplanted within this area. ",Y,"Singe ref bed, donor bed in two locations. ",21853,8976,23.2,34.2,62.2,70.4,NA,NA,"Didn't start monitoring the reference meadow until 6 mo after restoration, so this data was used as the 'initial are and shoot density' point. ",2003,May-August,Summer,7,"Months 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84",72,1.2,-2 to -5 ft MLLW,-2 to -5 ft MLLW,NA,NA,ND,54999,57881,1,90,74,ND,NA,"100% areal coverage, 85% density",Y,Y,"Did not meet areal success criteria at the 36mo mark, so planted more at the 48 mo mark., which is why they monitored for so long",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
PortOfLA_Pier300_EelgrassMitigationProject,PortOfLAPier300_Plot1of1,PortOfLA_Pier300_84mo,Grey literature,Merkel,LA Harbor,Pier 300,33.74,-118.25,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,"Used biodegradable, soft anchors - 'cotton line collar and pliable paper anchor'. 8-10 shoots per bundle","Created thier restoration area by make a submerged rock dike, filling it with dredge material to make the dept -5 to -2 MLLW, then tranplanted within this area. ",Y,"Singe ref bed, donor beds in two locations. ",21853,12197,23.2,34.2,131.2,25.9,NA,NA,"Didn't start monitoring the reference meadow until 6 mo after restoration, so this data was used as the 'initial are and shoot density' point. ",2003,May-August,Summer,7,"Months 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84",84,1.2,-2 to -5 ft MLLW,-2 to -5 ft MLLW,NA,NA,ND,54999,60202,1,143,17,ND,NA,"100% areal coverage, 85% density",Y,Y,"Did not meet areal success criteria at the 36mo mark, so planted more at the 48 mo mark., which is why they monitored for so long",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
CerritosBahia,CerritosBahia_plot1of1,CerritosBahia_plot1of1_6mo,Grey literature,TetraTech,Alamitos Bay,Cerritos Bahia Marina,33.76,-118.12,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Utilizing the sediment-free bundling method described by Fonseca et al. (1982), as modified in Curtis 1991. 10 to 15 eelgrass turions (shoots) with rhizomes intact were assembled into bundles by tying one end of a short cotton string securely around the demarcation between the turion and the rhizome, and attaching the otherend at a length of six inches to a approximately six-inch-long wooden popsicle stick. ",NA,Y,"Two donor beds, in two separate bu tnearby locations. Note ""An inspection of one of the donor sites on thelast day of the transplant indicated that the harvesters had not greatly impacted the site although disturbedareas  were  noted""",1357.9,ND,334,ND,230.4,ND,NA,NA,"ND on SDs but could easily calculated from 36mo report pg. 14. Single ref bed, 0.25 mi away from mitigation site. Comparable depth to mitigation site.",2012,June,Summer,5,"Months 6, 12, 24, 36, 48",6,1.55,-8,Mos tof the transplant site was -1.8 m (-6 ft) Mean Lower Low Water (MLLW) and the lower limit (deepest) was -2.1m (-7 ft) MLLW,NA,NA,NA,2084,1951,12.5,82,ND,ND,NA,NA,Y,Y,"Met areal success, but did mitigate over a 1.2 ratio. The shoot density success criteria was based off of the condition of the impacted mitigation bed before impact, which was very very low (~53) compared to the reference bed. This made achieving the shoot denisty success criteria very easy. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
CerritosBahia,CerritosBahia_plot1of1,CerritosBahia_plot1of1_12mo,Grey literature,TetraTech,Alamitos Bay,Cerritos Bahia Marina,33.76,-118.12,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Utilizing the sediment-free bundling method described by Fonseca et al. (1982), as modified in Curtis 1991. 10 to 15 eelgrass turions (shoots) with rhizomes intact were assembled into bundles by tying one end of a short cotton string securely around the demarcation between the turion and the rhizome, and attaching the otherend at a length of six inches to a approximately six-inch-long wooden popsicle stick. ",NA,Y,"Two donor beds, in two separate bu tnearby locations. Note ""An inspection of one of the donor sites on thelast day of the transplant indicated that the harvesters had not greatly impacted the site although disturbedareas  were  noted""",1357.9,ND,334,ND,143.7,ND,NA,NA,"ND on SDs but could easily calculated from 36mo report pg. 14. Single ref bed, 0.25 mi away from mitigation site. Comparable depth to mitigation site.",2012,June,Summer,5,"Months 6, 12, 24, 36, 48",12,1.55,-8,Mos tof the transplant site was -1.8 m (-6 ft) Mean Lower Low Water (MLLW) and the lower limit (deepest) was -2.1m (-7 ft) MLLW,NA,NA,NA,2084,2249,12.5,233.9,ND,ND,NA,"70% areal coverage, 30% density. Used denisty relative to the bed before it was impacted, not relative to the reference bed. ",Y,Y,"Met areal success, but did mitigate over a 1.2 ratio. The shoot density success criteria was based off of the condition of the impacted mitigation bed before impact, which was very very low (~53) compared to the reference bed. This made achieving the shoot denisty success criteria very easy. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
CerritosBahia,CerritosBahia_plot1of1,CerritosBahia_plot1of1_24mo,Grey literature,TetraTech,Alamitos Bay,Cerritos Bahia Marina,33.76,-118.12,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Utilizing the sediment-free bundling method described by Fonseca et al. (1982), as modified in Curtis 1991. 10 to 15 eelgrass turions (shoots) with rhizomes intact were assembled into bundles by tying one end of a short cotton string securely around the demarcation between the turion and the rhizome, and attaching the otherend at a length of six inches to a approximately six-inch-long wooden popsicle stick. ",NA,Y,"Two donor beds, in two separate bu tnearby locations. Note ""An inspection of one of the donor sites on thelast day of the transplant indicated that the harvesters had not greatly impacted the site although disturbedareas  were  noted""",1357.9,ND,334,ND,199.7,ND,NA,NA,"ND on SDs but could easily calculated from 36mo report pg. 14. Single ref bed, 0.25 mi away from mitigation site. Comparable depth to mitigation site.",2012,June,Summer,5,"Months 6, 12, 24, 36, 48",24,1.55,-8,Mos tof the transplant site was -1.8 m (-6 ft) Mean Lower Low Water (MLLW) and the lower limit (deepest) was -2.1m (-7 ft) MLLW,NA,NA,NA,2084,1869,12.5,107.5,ND,ND,NA,"85% areal coverage, 70% density.  Used denisty relative to the bed before it was impacted, not relative to the reference bed. ",Y,Y,"Met areal success, but did mitigate over a 1.2 ratio. The shoot density success criteria was based off of the condition of the impacted mitigation bed before impact, which was very very low (~53) compared to the reference bed. This made achieving the shoot denisty success criteria very easy. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,Y,"Shiner Perch (Cymatogaster aggregata) was the most  abundant fish observed (more than 100 noted in Fairway  C-E).  Other fish encountered included Barred Sand Bass (Paralabrax nebulifer), Spotted Sand Bass (Paralabrax maculatofasciatus), Dwarf Perch (Micrometrus minimus), Opaleye (Girella nigricans), Kelp Bass (Paralabrax clathratus), and Round Stingray (Urobatis halleri). Barred Sand Bass and Spotted Sand Bass to a lesser extent",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
CerritosBahia,CerritosBahia_plot1of1,CerritosBahia_plot1of1_36mo,Grey literature,TetraTech,Alamitos Bay,Cerritos Bahia Marina,33.76,-118.12,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Utilizing the sediment-free bundling method described by Fonseca et al. (1982), as modified in Curtis 1991. 10 to 15 eelgrass turions (shoots) with rhizomes intact were assembled into bundles by tying one end of a short cotton string securely around the demarcation between the turion and the rhizome, and attaching the otherend at a length of six inches to a approximately six-inch-long wooden popsicle stick. ",NA,Y,"Two donor beds, in two separate bu tnearby locations. Note ""An inspection of one of the donor sites on thelast day of the transplant indicated that the harvesters had not greatly impacted the site although disturbedareas  were  noted""",1357.9,ND,334,ND,186.2,ND,NA,NA,"ND on SDs but could easily calculated from 36mo report pg. 14. Single ref bed, 0.25 mi away from mitigation site. Comparable depth to mitigation site.",2012,June,Summer,5,"Months 6, 12, 24, 36, 48",36,1.55,-8,Mos tof the transplant site was -1.8 m (-6 ft) Mean Lower Low Water (MLLW) and the lower limit (deepest) was -2.1m (-7 ft) MLLW,NA,NA,NA,2084,1914,12.5,138.6,ND,ND,NA,"100% areal coverage, 85% density.  Used denisty relative to the bed before it was impacted, not relative to the reference bed. ",Y,Y,"Met areal success, but did mitigate over a 1.2 ratio. The shoot density success criteria was based off of the condition of the impacted mitigation bed before impact, which was very very low (~53) compared to the reference bed. This made achieving the shoot denisty success criteria very easy. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,Y,"Shiner perch, CA halibut, barred sand bass, inverts. ",Halibut,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
CerritosBahia,CerritosBahia_plot1of1,CerritosBahia_plot1of1_48mo,Grey literature,TetraTech,Alamitos Bay,Cerritos Bahia Marina,33.76,-118.12,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Utilizing the sediment-free bundling method described by Fonseca et al. (1982), as modified in Curtis 1991. 10 to 15 eelgrass turions (shoots) with rhizomes intact were assembled into bundles by tying one end of a short cotton string securely around the demarcation between the turion and the rhizome, and attaching the otherend at a length of six inches to a approximately six-inch-long wooden popsicle stick. ",NA,Y,"Two donor beds, in two separate bu tnearby locations. Note ""An inspection of one of the donor sites on thelast day of the transplant indicated that the harvesters had not greatly impacted the site although disturbedareas  were  noted""",1357.9,ND,334,ND,143.8,ND,NA,NA,"ND on SDs but could easily calculated from 36mo report pg. 14. Single ref bed, 0.25 mi away from mitigation site. Comparable depth to mitigation site.",2012,June,Summer,5,"Months 6, 12, 24, 36, 48",48,1.55,-8,Mos tof the transplant site was -1.8 m (-6 ft) Mean Lower Low Water (MLLW) and the lower limit (deepest) was -2.1m (-7 ft) MLLW,NA,NA,NA,2084,1830,12.5,125.8,ND,ND,NA,"100% areal coverage, 85% density.  Used denisty relative to the bed before it was impacted, not relative to the reference bed. ",Y,Y,"Met areal success, but did mitigate over a 1.2 ratio. The shoot density success criteria was based off of the condition of the impacted mitigation bed before impact, which was very very low (~53) compared to the reference bed. This made achieving the shoot denisty success criteria very easy. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
OCCK_LivingShorelines_2012,OCCK_DT,OCCK_DT_6mo,Grey literature,"OC CoastKeeper, CSU Fullerton",Newport Bay,De Anza,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,NA,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,DT- diver transplant.,NA,Y,"Inner Linda Isla (close by in a small embayment, a muddier, lower flow site than the restoration site)",NA,NA,172.5,80.2,88,63.83,NA,NA,"Shoot densities had a sig decrease over fall 2012, but then remained steady until 2014 when monitoring ended. See pg 17 Fig. 11 in 2015 final report. ",2012,June,Summer,2.5,"Months 6, 12, 18, 24, 30",6,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,1700-2250,64,55,33.2,96.7,44.4,ND,NA,"Report pg 7:  After 1 yr post-restoration, sites have 50% oroginal planted area and 20% reference site density. 2 yrs post-restoration, sites have 60% oroginal planted area and 70% reference site density. Restored sites will maintain a 75% of original planted area and 85% of the reference density for the following 2 years of monitoring (MW: unclear on this last point- does this mean yrs 3&4? they Only montored for 2.5 max).",Y,Y,"Although many of the areal cover metrics were not successful, nealry all of the density success criteria were met after 1.5 years (see pg 17, table 2). (Shoot densities were not recorded after 2.5 years.). For planted shoot densities, we estimated based on ""170 total bundles w/10-15 shoots in each within the 64m2 plot (0.5 m apart each). "" Using a median of 12.5 shoots per bundle. ",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,Y,"Grain size mentioned, but not reported in text. Could be available upon request",NA,ND,Y,"See appendix E- Algae, sponges, tunicates, mollusks, fish, inverts",Halibut,"Not quantitative, and only one table pooled across the entire project (no lists for each monitoring time point)",ND,ND,Y,ND,ND
OCCK_LivingShorelines_2012,OCCK_DT,OCCK_DT_12mo,Grey literature,"OC CoastKeeper, CSU Fullerton",Newport Bay,De Anza,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,NA,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,DT- diver transplant. ,NA,Y,"Inner Linda Isla (close by in a small embayment, a muddier, lower flow site than the restoration site)",NA,NA,172.5,80.2,92,59.33,NA,NA,"Shoot densities had a sig decrease over fall 2012, but then remained steady until 2014 when monitoring ended. See pg 17 Fig. 11 in 2015 final report. ",2012,June,Summer,2.5,"Months 6, 12, 18, 24, 30",12,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,1700-2250,64,47.3,33.2,57.68,43.28,ND,NA,"Report pg 7:  After 1 yr post-restoration, sites have 50% oroginal planted area and 20% reference site density. 2 yrs post-restoration, sites have 60% oroginal planted area and 70% reference site density. Restored sites will maintain a 75% of original planted area and 85% of the reference density for the following 2 years of monitoring (MW: unclear on this last point- does this mean yrs 3&4? they Only montored for 2.5 max).",Y,Y,"Although many of the areal cover metrics were not successful, nealry all of the density success criteria were met after 1.5 years (see pg 17, table 2). (Shoot densities were not recorded after 2.5 years.). For planted shoot densities, we estimated based on ""170 total bundles w/10-15 shoots in each within the 64m2 plot (0.5 m apart each). "" Using a median of 12.5 shoots per bundle. 
",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,Y,"Grain size mentioned, but not reported in text. Could be available upon request",NA,ND,Y,"See appendix E- Algae, sponges, tunicates, mollusks, fish, inverts",Halibut,"Not quantitative, and only one table pooled across the entire project (no lists for each monitoring time point)",ND,ND,Y,ND,ND
OCCK_LivingShorelines_2012,OCCK_DT,OCCK_DT_30mo,Grey literature,"OC CoastKeeper, CSU Fullerton",Newport Bay,De Anza,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,NA,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,DT- diver transplant. ,NA,Y,"Inner Linda Isla (close by in a small embayment, a muddier, lower flow site than the restoration site)",NA,NA,172.5,80.2,87.47,44.38,NA,NA,"Shoot densities had a sig decrease over fall 2012, but then remained steady until 2014 when monitoring ended. See pg 17 Fig. 11 in 2015 final report. ",2012,June,Summer,2.5,"Months 6, 12, 18, 24, 30",30,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,1700-2250,64,9.5,33.2,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Report pg 7:  After 1 yr post-restoration, sites have 50% oroginal planted area and 20% reference site density. 2 yrs post-restoration, sites have 60% oroginal planted area and 70% reference site density. Restored sites will maintain a 75% of original planted area and 85% of the reference density for the following 2 years of monitoring (MW: unclear on this last point- does this mean yrs 3&4? they Only montored for 2.5 max).",N,N,"Although many of the areal cover metrics were not successful, nealry all of the density success criteria were met after 1.5 years (see pg 17, table 2). (Shoot densities were not recorded after 2.5 years.). They note that after 2 years, the DT site did not meet the shoot density success criteria, but don't report the actual value. Taking them at their word on this. For planted shoot densities, we estimated based on ""170 total bundles w/10-15 shoots in each within the 64m2 plot (0.5 m apart each). "" Using a median of 12.5 shoots per bundle. ",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,Y,"Grain size mentioned, but not reported in text. Could be available upon request",NA,ND,Y,"See appendix E- Algae, sponges, tunicates, mollusks, fish, inverts",Halibut,"Not quantitative, and only one table pooled across the entire project (no lists for each monitoring time point)",ND,ND,Y,ND,ND
OCCK_LivingShorelines_2012,OCCK_TERFS,OCCK_TERFS_6mo,Grey literature,"OC CoastKeeper, CSU Fullerton",Newport Bay,De Anza,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,NA,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,TERFS (Diver transplant) ,NA,Y,"Inner Linda Isla (close by in a small embayment, a muddier, lower flow site than the restoration site)",NA,NA,172.5,80.2,88,63.83,NA,NA,"Shoot densities had a sig decrease over fall 2012, but then remained steady until 2014 when monitoring ended. See pg 17 Fig. 11 in 2015 final report. ",2012,June,Summer,2.5,"Months 6, 12, 18, 24, 30",6,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,"20 frames total with the 6m2 plot (1 m apart). But they don't report how many turions or bundles are on each frame, so can't really do this calculation",64,0.6,ND,31.53,11.72,ND,NA,"Report pg 7:  After 1 yr post-restoration, sites have 50% oroginal planted area and 20% reference site density. 2 yrs post-restoration, sites have 60% oroginal planted area and 70% reference site density. Restored sites will maintain a 75% of original planted area and 85% of the reference density for the following 2 years of monitoring (MW: unclear on this last point- does this mean yrs 3&4? they Only montored for 2.5 max).",N,Y,"Although many of the areal cover metrics were not successful, nealry all of the density success criteria were met after 1.5 years (see pg 17, table 2). (Shoot densities were not recorded after 2.5 years.)",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,Y,"Grain size mentioned, but not reported in text. Could be available upon request",NA,ND,Y,"See appendix E- Algae, sponges, tunicates, mollusks, fish, inverts",Halibut,"Not quantitative, and only one table pooled across the entire project (no lists for each monitoring time point)",ND,ND,Y,ND,ND
OCCK_LivingShorelines_2012,OCCK_TERFS,OCCK_TERFS_12mo,Grey literature,"OC CoastKeeper, CSU Fullerton",Newport Bay,De Anza,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,NA,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,TERFS (Diver transplant) ,NA,Y,"Inner Linda Isla (close by in a small embayment, a muddier, lower flow site than the restoration site)",NA,NA,172.5,80.2,92,59.33,NA,NA,"Shoot densities had a sig decrease over fall 2012, but then remained steady until 2014 when monitoring ended. See pg 17 Fig. 11 in 2015 final report. ",2012,June,Summer,2.5,"Months 6, 12, 18, 24, 30",12,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,"20 frames total with the 6m2 plot (1 m apart). But they don't report how many turions or bundles are on each frame, so can't really do this calculation",64,57.9,ND,119.58,43.28,ND,NA,"Report pg 7:  After 1 yr post-restoration, sites have 50% oroginal planted area and 20% reference site density. 2 yrs post-restoration, sites have 60% oroginal planted area and 70% reference site density. Restored sites will maintain a 75% of original planted area and 85% of the reference density for the following 2 years of monitoring (MW: unclear on this last point- does this mean yrs 3&4? they Only montored for 2.5 max).",Y,Y,"Although many of the areal cover metrics were not successful, nealry all of the density success criteria were met after 1.5 years (see pg 17, table 2). (Shoot densities were not recorded after 2.5 years.)",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,Y,"Grain size mentioned, but not reported in text. Could be available upon request",NA,ND,Y,"See appendix E- Algae, sponges, tunicates, mollusks, fish, inverts",Halibut,"Not quantitative, and only one table pooled across the entire project (no lists for each monitoring time point)",ND,ND,Y,ND,ND
OCCK_LivingShorelines_2012,OCCK_TERFS,OCCK_TERFS_30mo,Grey literature,"OC CoastKeeper, CSU Fullerton",Newport Bay,De Anza,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,NA,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,TERFS (Diver transplant) ,NA,Y,"Inner Linda Isla (close by in a small embayment, a muddier, lower flow site than the restoration site)",NA,NA,172.5,80.2,87.47,44.38,NA,NA,"Shoot densities had a sig decrease over fall 2012, but then remained steady until 2014 when monitoring ended. See pg 17 Fig. 11 in 2015 final report. ",2012,June,Summer,2.5,"Months 6, 12, 18, 24, 30",30,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,"20 frames total with the 6m2 plot (1 m apart). But they don't report how many turions or bundles are on each frame, so can't really do this calculation",64,28.2,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Report pg 7:  After 1 yr post-restoration, sites have 50% oroginal planted area and 20% reference site density. 2 yrs post-restoration, sites have 60% oroginal planted area and 70% reference site density. Restored sites will maintain a 75% of original planted area and 85% of the reference density for the following 2 years of monitoring (MW: unclear on this last point- does this mean yrs 3&4? they Only montored for 2.5 max).",N,ND,"Although many of the areal cover metrics were not successful, nealry all of the density success criteria were met after 1.5 years (see pg 17, table 2). (Shoot densities were not recorded after 2.5 years.)",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,Y,"Grain size mentioned, but not reported in text. Could be available upon request",NA,ND,Y,"See appendix E- Algae, sponges, tunicates, mollusks, fish, inverts",Halibut,"Not quantitative, and only one table pooled across the entire project (no lists for each monitoring time point)",ND,ND,Y,ND,ND
OCCK_LivingShorelines_2012,OCCK_BuDs,OCCK_BuDS_6mo,Grey literature,"OC CoastKeeper, CSU Fullerton",Newport Bay,De Anza,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,NA,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Seed: Suspended mesh bags with up to 100 flowershoots. 20 units (buoys) deployed at 3m intervals within a 108m2 area (no idea how many bags or shoots per buoy),NA,Y,"Inner Linda Isla (close by in a small embayment, a muddier, lower flow site than the restoration site)",NA,NA,172.5,80.2,88,63.83,NA,NA,"Shoot densities had a sig decrease over fall 2012, but then remained steady until 2014 when monitoring ended. See pg 17 Fig. 11 in 2015 final report. ",2012,June,Summer,2.5,"Months 6, 12, 18, 24, 30",6,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,108,22.2,NA,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Report pg 7:  After 1 yr post-restoration, sites have 50% oroginal planted area and 20% reference site density. 2 yrs post-restoration, sites have 60% oroginal planted area and 70% reference site density. Restored sites will maintain a 75% of original planted area and 85% of the reference density for the following 2 years of monitoring (MW: unclear on this last point- does this mean yrs 3&4? they Only montored for 2.5 max).",N,ND,"Although many of the areal cover metrics were not successful, nealry all of the density success criteria were met after 1.5 years (see pg 17, table 2). (Shoot densities were not recorded after 2.5 years.)",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,Y,"Grain size mentioned, but not reported in text. Could be available upon request",NA,ND,Y,"See appendix E- Algae, sponges, tunicates, mollusks, fish, inverts",Halibut,"Not quantitative, and only one table pooled across the entire project (no lists for each monitoring time point)",ND,ND,Y,ND,ND
OCCK_LivingShorelines_2012,OCCK_BuDs,OCCK_BuDS_12mo,Grey literature,"OC CoastKeeper, CSU Fullerton",Newport Bay,De Anza,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,NA,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Seed: Suspended mesh bags with up to 100 flowershoots. 20 units (buoys) deployed at 3m intervals within a 108m2 area (no idea how many bags or shoots per buoy),NA,Y,"Inner Linda Isla (close by in a small embayment, a muddier, lower flow site than the restoration site)",NA,NA,172.5,80.2,92,59.33,NA,NA,"Shoot densities had a sig decrease over fall 2012, but then remained steady until 2014 when monitoring ended. See pg 17 Fig. 11 in 2015 final report. ",2012,June,Summer,2.5,"Months 6, 12, 18, 24, 30",12,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,108,62.9,NA,104.84,37.61,ND,NA,"Report pg 7:  After 1 yr post-restoration, sites have 50% oroginal planted area and 20% reference site density. 2 yrs post-restoration, sites have 60% oroginal planted area and 70% reference site density. Restored sites will maintain a 75% of original planted area and 85% of the reference density for the following 2 years of monitoring (MW: unclear on this last point- does this mean yrs 3&4? they Only montored for 2.5 max).",Y,Y,"Although many of the areal cover metrics were not successful, nealry all of the density success criteria were met after 1.5 years (see pg 17, table 2). (Shoot densities were not recorded after 2.5 years.)",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,Y,"Grain size mentioned, but not reported in text. Could be available upon request",NA,ND,Y,"See appendix E- Algae, sponges, tunicates, mollusks, fish, inverts",Halibut,"Not quantitative, and only one table pooled across the entire project (no lists for each monitoring time point)",ND,ND,Y,ND,ND
OCCK_LivingShorelines_2012,OCCK_BuDs,OCCK_BuDS_30mo,Grey literature,"OC CoastKeeper, CSU Fullerton",Newport Bay,De Anza,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,NA,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Seed: Suspended mesh bags with up to 100 flowershoots. 20 units (buoys) deployed at 3m intervals within a 108m2 area (no idea how many bags or shoots per buoy),NA,Y,"Inner Linda Isla (close by in a small embayment, a muddier, lower flow site than the restoration site)",NA,NA,172.5,80.2,87.47,44.38,NA,NA,"Shoot densities had a sig decrease over fall 2012, but then remained steady until 2014 when monitoring ended. See pg 17 Fig. 11 in 2015 final report. ",2012,June,Summer,2.5,"Months 6, 12, 18, 24, 30",30,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,108,4.6,NA,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Report pg 7:  After 1 yr post-restoration, sites have 50% oroginal planted area and 20% reference site density. 2 yrs post-restoration, sites have 60% oroginal planted area and 70% reference site density. Restored sites will maintain a 75% of original planted area and 85% of the reference density for the following 2 years of monitoring (MW: unclear on this last point- does this mean yrs 3&4? they Only montored for 2.5 max).",N,ND,"Although many of the areal cover metrics were not successful, nealry all of the density success criteria were met after 1.5 years (see pg 17, table 2). (Shoot densities were not recorded after 2.5 years.)",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,Y,"Grain size mentioned, but not reported in text. Could be available upon request",NA,ND,Y,"See appendix E- Algae, sponges, tunicates, mollusks, fish, inverts",Halibut,"Not quantitative, and only one table pooled across the entire project (no lists for each monitoring time point)",ND,ND,Y,ND,ND
OCCK_LivingShorelines_2013,OCCK_Plot1_DP1,OCCK_Plot_1_6mo,Grey literature,"OC CoastKeeper, CSU Fullerton",Newport Bay,De Anza - DP1,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,NA,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,Popsicle Stick: DT- diver transplant.,"After the 2012 pilots, diver transplats was deemed best and used in these subsequest 2012 and 2013 restorations",Y,"Inner Linda Isla (close by in a small embayment, a muddier, lower flow site than the restoration site)",NA,NA,92,59.33,87.47,44.38,NA,NA,"See pg 17 Fig. 11 in 2015 final report, and 'Control' in Appendix A. ",2013,June,Summer,2,"Months 6, 12, 18, 24",6,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,1700-2250,100,ND,33.2,53.78,62.62,ND,NA,"Report pg 7:  After 1 yr post-restoration, sites have 50% oroginal planted area and 20% reference site density. 2 yrs post-restoration, sites have 60% oroginal planted area and 70% reference site density. Restored sites will maintain a 75% of original planted area and 85% of the reference density for the following 2 years of monitoring (MW: unclear on this last point- does this mean yrs 3&4? they Only montored for 2.5 max).",ND,NA,"See bolded values in table 3 (pg 20) for areal coverage success. For planted shoot densities, we estimated based on ""170 total bundles w/10-15 shoots in each within the 64m2 plot (0.5 m apart each). "" Using a median of 12.5 shoots per bundle. ",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,Y,"Grain size mentioned, but not reported in text. Could be available upon request",NA,ND,Y,"See appendix E- Algae, sponges, tunicates, mollusks, fish, inverts",Halibut,"Not quantitative, and only one table pooled across the entire project (no lists for each monitoring time point)",ND,ND,Y,ND,ND
OCCK_LivingShorelines_2013,OCCK_Plot1_DP1,OCCK_Plot_1_12mo,Grey literature,"OC CoastKeeper, CSU Fullerton",Newport Bay,De Anza - DP1,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,NA,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,Popsicle Stick: DT- diver transplant.,"After the 2012 pilots, diver transplats was deemed best and used in these subsequest 2012 and 2013 restorations",Y,"Inner Linda Isla (close by in a small embayment, a muddier, lower flow site than the restoration site)",NA,NA,92,59.33,85.07,112.01,NA,NA,"See pg 17 Fig. 11 in 2015 final report, and 'Control' in Appendix A. ",2013,June,Summer,2,"Months 6, 12, 18, 24",12,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,1700-2250,100,ND,33.2,65.29,91.54,ND,NA,"Report pg 7:  After 1 yr post-restoration, sites have 50% oroginal planted area and 20% reference site density. 2 yrs post-restoration, sites have 60% oroginal planted area and 70% reference site density. Restored sites will maintain a 75% of original planted area and 85% of the reference density for the following 2 years of monitoring (MW: unclear on this last point- does this mean yrs 3&4? they Only montored for 2.5 max).",ND,Y,"See bolded values in table 3 (pg 20) for areal coverage success. For planted shoot densities, we estimated based on ""170 total bundles w/10-15 shoots in each within the 64m2 plot (0.5 m apart each). "" Using a median of 12.5 shoots per bundle. ",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,Y,"Grain size mentioned, but not reported in text. Could be available upon request",NA,ND,Y,"See appendix E- Algae, sponges, tunicates, mollusks, fish, inverts",Halibut,"Not quantitative, and only one table pooled across the entire project (no lists for each monitoring time point)",ND,ND,Y,ND,ND
OCCK_LivingShorelines_2013,OCCK_Plot1_DP1,OCCK_Plot_1_24mo,Grey literature,"OC CoastKeeper, CSU Fullerton",Newport Bay,De Anza - DP1,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,NA,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,Popsicle Stick: DT- diver transplant.,"After the 2012 pilots, diver transplats was deemed best and used in these subsequest 2012 and 2013 restorations",Y,"Inner Linda Isla (close by in a small embayment, a muddier, lower flow site than the restoration site)",NA,NA,92,59.33,117.87,97.1,NA,NA,"See pg 17 Fig. 11 in 2015 final report, and 'Control' in Appendix A. ",2013,June,Summer,2,"Months 6, 12, 18, 24",24,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,1700-2250,100,5.5,33.2,41.52,63.18,5.5,NA,"Report pg 7:  After 1 yr post-restoration, sites have 50% oroginal planted area and 20% reference site density. 2 yrs post-restoration, sites have 60% oroginal planted area and 70% reference site density. Restored sites will maintain a 75% of original planted area and 85% of the reference density for the following 2 years of monitoring (MW: unclear on this last point- does this mean yrs 3&4? they Only montored for 2.5 max).",N,N,"Red cells are from Feb. 2015 (1.5 years after planting). They do not report coverage at the 24 month mark. For planted shoot densities, we estimated based on ""170 total bundles w/10-15 shoots in each within the 64m2 plot (0.5 m apart each). "" Using a median of 12.5 shoots per bundle. ",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,Y,"Grain size mentioned, but not reported in text. Could be available upon request",NA,ND,Y,"See appendix E- Algae, sponges, tunicates, mollusks, fish, inverts",Halibut,"Not quantitative, and only one table pooled across the entire project (no lists for each monitoring time point)",ND,ND,Y,ND,ND
OCCK_LivingShorelines_2013,OCCK_Plot4_DP2,OCCK_Plot_4_6mo,Grey literature,"OC CoastKeeper, CSU Fullerton",Newport Bay,De Anza - DP2,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,NA,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,Popsicle Stick: DT- diver transplant.,"After the 2012 pilots, diver transplats was deemed best and used in these subsequest 2012 and 2013 restorations",Y,"Inner Linda Isla (close by in a small embayment, a muddier, lower flow site than the restoration site)",NA,NA,92,59.33,87.47,44.38,NA,NA,"See pg 17 Fig. 11 in 2015 final report, and 'Control' in Appendix A. ",2013,June,Summer,2,"Months 6, 12, 18, 24",6,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,1700-2250,100,ND,33.2,19.43,25.63,ND,NA,"Report pg 7:  After 1 yr post-restoration, sites have 50% oroginal planted area and 20% reference site density. 2 yrs post-restoration, sites have 60% oroginal planted area and 70% reference site density. Restored sites will maintain a 75% of original planted area and 85% of the reference density for the following 2 years of monitoring (MW: unclear on this last point- does this mean yrs 3&4? they Only montored for 2.5 max).",ND,NA,"See bolded values in table 3 (pg 20) for areal coverage success. For planted shoot densities, we estimated based on ""170 total bundles w/10-15 shoots in each within the 64m2 plot (0.5 m apart each). "" Using a median of 12.5 shoots per bundle. ",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,Y,"Grain size mentioned, but not reported in text. Could be available upon request",NA,ND,Y,"See appendix E- Algae, sponges, tunicates, mollusks, fish, inverts",Halibut,"Not quantitative, and only one table pooled across the entire project (no lists for each monitoring time point)",ND,ND,Y,ND,ND
OCCK_LivingShorelines_2013,OCCK_Plot4_DP2,OCCK_Plot_4_12mo,Grey literature,"OC CoastKeeper, CSU Fullerton",Newport Bay,De Anza - DP2,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,NA,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,Popsicle Stick: DT- diver transplant.,"After the 2012 pilots, diver transplats was deemed best and used in these subsequest 2012 and 2013 restorations",Y,"Inner Linda Isla (close by in a small embayment, a muddier, lower flow site than the restoration site)",NA,NA,92,59.33,85.07,112.01,NA,NA,"See pg 17 Fig. 11 in 2015 final report, and 'Control' in Appendix A. ",2013,June,Summer,2,"Months 6, 12, 18, 24",12,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,1700-2250,100,ND,33.2,45.16,70.52,ND,NA,"Report pg 7:  After 1 yr post-restoration, sites have 50% oroginal planted area and 20% reference site density. 2 yrs post-restoration, sites have 60% oroginal planted area and 70% reference site density. Restored sites will maintain a 75% of original planted area and 85% of the reference density for the following 2 years of monitoring (MW: unclear on this last point- does this mean yrs 3&4? they Only montored for 2.5 max).",ND,Y,"See bolded values in table 3 (pg 20) for areal coverage success. For planted shoot densities, we estimated based on ""170 total bundles w/10-15 shoots in each within the 64m2 plot (0.5 m apart each). "" Using a median of 12.5 shoots per bundle. ",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,Y,"Grain size mentioned, but not reported in text. Could be available upon request",NA,ND,Y,"See appendix E- Algae, sponges, tunicates, mollusks, fish, inverts",Halibut,"Not quantitative, and only one table pooled across the entire project (no lists for each monitoring time point)",ND,ND,Y,ND,ND
OCCK_LivingShorelines_2013,OCCK_Plot4_DP2,OCCK_Plot_4_24mo,Grey literature,"OC CoastKeeper, CSU Fullerton",Newport Bay,De Anza - DP2,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,NA,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,Popsicle Stick: DT- diver transplant.,"After the 2012 pilots, diver transplats was deemed best and used in these subsequest 2012 and 2013 restorations",Y,"Inner Linda Isla (close by in a small embayment, a muddier, lower flow site than the restoration site)",NA,NA,92,59.33,117.87,97.1,NA,NA,"See pg 17 Fig. 11 in 2015 final report, and 'Control' in Appendix A. ",2013,June,Summer,2,"Months 6, 12, 18, 24",24,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,1700-2250,100,49.7,33.2,100.63,58.75,49.7,NA,"Report pg 7:  After 1 yr post-restoration, sites have 50% oroginal planted area and 20% reference site density. 2 yrs post-restoration, sites have 60% oroginal planted area and 70% reference site density. Restored sites will maintain a 75% of original planted area and 85% of the reference density for the following 2 years of monitoring (MW: unclear on this last point- does this mean yrs 3&4? they Only montored for 2.5 max).",N,Y,"Red cells are from Feb. 2015 (1.5 years after planting). They do not report coverage at the 24 month mark. See bolded values in table 3 (pg 20) for areal coverage success. For planted shoot densities, we estimated based on ""170 total bundles w/10-15 shoots in each within the 64m2 plot (0.5 m apart each). "" Using a median of 12.5 shoots per bundle. ",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,Y,"Grain size mentioned, but not reported in text. Could be available upon request",NA,ND,Y,"See appendix E- Algae, sponges, tunicates, mollusks, fish, inverts",Halibut,"Not quantitative, and only one table pooled across the entire project (no lists for each monitoring time point)",ND,ND,Y,ND,ND
OCCK_LivingShorelines_2014,OCCK_Plot2_DP1A,OCCK_Plot2_6mo,Grey literature,"OC CoastKeeper, CSU Fullerton",Newport Bay,De Anza - DP1A,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,NA,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,Popsicle Stick: DT- diver transplant.,"After the 2012 pilots, diver transplats was deemed best and used in these subsequest 2012 and 2013 restorations",Y,"Inner Linda Isla (close by in a small embayment, a muddier, lower flow site than the restoration site)",NA,NA,85.07,112.01,59.89,42.88,NA,NA,"See pg 17 Fig. 11 in 2015 final report, and 'Control' in Appendix A. ",2014,July,Summer,1,"Months 6, 12",6,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,1700-2250,100,ND,33.2,19.29,25.15,ND,NA,"Report pg 7:  After 1 yr post-restoration, sites have 50% oroginal planted area and 20% reference site density. 2 yrs post-restoration, sites have 60% oroginal planted area and 70% reference site density. Restored sites will maintain a 75% of original planted area and 85% of the reference density for the following 2 years of monitoring (MW: unclear on this last point- does this mean yrs 3&4? they Only montored for 2.5 max).",ND,NA,"See bolded values in table 3 (pg 20) for areal coverage success. For planted shoot densities, we estimated based on ""170 total bundles w/10-15 shoots in each within the 64m2 plot (0.5 m apart each). "" Using a median of 12.5 shoots per bundle. ",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,Y,"Grain size mentioned, but not reported in text. Could be available upon request",NA,ND,Y,"See appendix E- Algae, sponges, tunicates, mollusks, fish, inverts",Halibut,"Not quantitative, and only one table pooled across the entire project (no lists for each monitoring time point)",ND,NC,Y,ND,ND
OCCK_LivingShorelines_2014,OCCK_Plot2_DP1A,OCCK_Plot2_12mo,Grey literature,"OC CoastKeeper, CSU Fullerton",Newport Bay,De Anza - DP1A,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,NA,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,Popsicle Stick: DT- diver transplant.,"After the 2012 pilots, diver transplats was deemed best and used in these subsequest 2012 and 2013 restorations",Y,"Inner Linda Isla (close by in a small embayment, a muddier, lower flow site than the restoration site)",NA,NA,85.07,112.01,117.87,97.1,NA,NA,"See pg 17 Fig. 11 in 2015 final report, and 'Control' in Appendix A. ",2014,July,Summer,1,"Months 6, 12",12,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,1700-2250,100,70.47,33.2,92.8,72.11,70.5,NA,"Report pg 7:  After 1 yr post-restoration, sites have 50% oroginal planted area and 20% reference site density. 2 yrs post-restoration, sites have 60% oroginal planted area and 70% reference site density. Restored sites will maintain a 75% of original planted area and 85% of the reference density for the following 2 years of monitoring (MW: unclear on this last point- does this mean yrs 3&4? they Only montored for 2.5 max).",Y,Y,"Red cells are from Feb. 2015 (~7 mo after planting). They do not report coverage at the 12 month mark. See bolded values in table 3 (pg 20) for areal coverage success. For planted shoot densities, we estimated based on ""170 total bundles w/10-15 shoots in each within the 64m2 plot (0.5 m apart each). "" Using a median of 12.5 shoots per bundle. ",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,Y,"Grain size mentioned, but not reported in text. Could be available upon request",NA,ND,Y,"See appendix E- Algae, sponges, tunicates, mollusks, fish, inverts",Halibut,"Not quantitative, and only one table pooled across the entire project (no lists for each monitoring time point)",ND,NC,Y,ND,ND
OCCK_LivingShorelines_2014,OCCK_Plot3_DP1B,OCCK_Plot3_6mo,Grey literature,"OC CoastKeeper, CSU Fullerton",Newport Bay,De Anza - DP1B,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,NA,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,Popsicle Stick: DT- diver transplant.,"After the 2012 pilots, diver transplats was deemed best and used in these subsequest 2012 and 2013 restorations",Y,"Inner Linda Isla (close by in a small embayment, a muddier, lower flow site than the restoration site)",NA,NA,85.07,112.01,59.89,42.88,NA,NA,"See pg 17 Fig. 11 in 2015 final report, and 'Control' in Appendix A. ",2014,July,Summer,1,"Months 6, 12",6,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,1700-2250,100,ND,33.2,40.4,38.63,ND,NA,"Report pg 7:  After 1 yr post-restoration, sites have 50% oroginal planted area and 20% reference site density. 2 yrs post-restoration, sites have 60% oroginal planted area and 70% reference site density. Restored sites will maintain a 75% of original planted area and 85% of the reference density for the following 2 years of monitoring (MW: unclear on this last point- does this mean yrs 3&4? they Only montored for 2.5 max).",ND,NA,"See bolded values in table 3 (pg 20) for areal coverage success. These data met the 60% coverage criteria, but failed to meet shoot density criteria (table 4). For planted shoot densities, we estimated based on ""170 total bundles w/10-15 shoots in each within the 64m2 plot (0.5 m apart each). "" Using a median of 12.5 shoots per bundle. ",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,Y,"Grain size mentioned, but not reported in text. Could be available upon request",NA,ND,Y,"See appendix E- Algae, sponges, tunicates, mollusks, fish, inverts",Halibut,"Not quantitative, and only one table pooled across the entire project (no lists for each monitoring time point)",ND,NC,Y,ND,ND
OCCK_LivingShorelines_2014,OCCK_Plot3_DP1B,OCCK_Plot3_12mo,Grey literature,"OC CoastKeeper, CSU Fullerton",Newport Bay,De Anza - DP1B,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,NA,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,Popsicle Stick: DT- diver transplant.,"After the 2012 pilots, diver transplats was deemed best and used in these subsequest 2012 and 2013 restorations",Y,"Inner Linda Isla (close by in a small embayment, a muddier, lower flow site than the restoration site)",NA,NA,85.07,112.01,117.87,97.1,NA,NA,"See pg 17 Fig. 11 in 2015 final report, and 'Control' in Appendix A. ",2014,July,Summer,1,"Months 6, 12",12,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,1700-2250,100,60.18,33.2,ND,ND,60.2,NA,"Report pg 7:  After 1 yr post-restoration, sites have 50% oroginal planted area and 20% reference site density. 2 yrs post-restoration, sites have 60% oroginal planted area and 70% reference site density. Restored sites will maintain a 75% of original planted area and 85% of the reference density for the following 2 years of monitoring (MW: unclear on this last point- does this mean yrs 3&4? they Only montored for 2.5 max).",Y,ND,"See bolded values in table 3 (pg 20) for areal coverage success. These data met the 60% coverage criteria, but failed to meet shoot density criteria (table 4)",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,Y,"Grain size mentioned, but not reported in text. Could be available upon request",NA,ND,Y,"See appendix E- Algae, sponges, tunicates, mollusks, fish, inverts",Halibut,"Not quantitative, and only one table pooled across the entire project (no lists for each monitoring time point)",ND,NC,Y,ND,ND
OCCK_LivingShorelines_2014,OCCK_Plot5,OCCK_Plot5_6mo,Grey literature,"OC CoastKeeper, CSU Fullerton",Newport Bay,De Anza,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,NA,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,Popsicle Stick: DT- diver transplant.,"After the 2012 pilots, diver transplats was deemed best and used in these subsequest 2012 and 2013 restorations",Y,"Inner Linda Isla (close by in a small embayment, a muddier, lower flow site than the restoration site)",NA,NA,85.07,112.01,59.89,42.88,NA,NA,"See pg 17 Fig. 11 in 2015 final report, and 'Control' in Appendix A. ",2014,July,Summer,1,"Months 6, 12",6,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,1700-2250,40,ND,33.2,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Report pg 7:  After 1 yr post-restoration, sites have 50% oroginal planted area and 20% reference site density. 2 yrs post-restoration, sites have 60% oroginal planted area and 70% reference site density. Restored sites will maintain a 75% of original planted area and 85% of the reference density for the following 2 years of monitoring (MW: unclear on this last point- does this mean yrs 3&4? they Only montored for 2.5 max).",ND,ND,"Red cells are from Feb. 2015 (~7 mo after planting). They do not report coverage at the 12 month mark. See bolded values in table 3 (pg 20) for areal coverage success. For planted shoot densities, we estimated based on ""170 total bundles w/10-15 shoots in each within the 64m2 plot (0.5 m apart each). "" Using a median of 12.5 shoots per bundle. ",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,Y,"Grain size mentioned, but not reported in text. Could be available upon request",NA,ND,Y,"See appendix E- Algae, sponges, tunicates, mollusks, fish, inverts",Halibut,"Not quantitative, and only one table pooled across the entire project (no lists for each monitoring time point)",ND,NC,Y,ND,ND
OCCK_LivingShorelines_2014,OCCK_Plot5,OCCK_Plot5_12mo,Grey literature,"OC CoastKeeper, CSU Fullerton",Newport Bay,De Anza,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,NA,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,Popsicle Stick: DT- diver transplant.,"After the 2012 pilots, diver transplats was deemed best and used in these subsequest 2012 and 2013 restorations",Y,"Inner Linda Isla (close by in a small embayment, a muddier, lower flow site than the restoration site)",NA,NA,85.07,112.01,117.87,97.1,NA,NA,"See pg 17 Fig. 11 in 2015 final report, and 'Control' in Appendix A. ",2014,July,Summer,1,"Months 6, 12",12,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,1700-2250,40,0,33.2,ND,ND,0,NA,"Report pg 7:  After 1 yr post-restoration, sites have 50% oroginal planted area and 20% reference site density. 2 yrs post-restoration, sites have 60% oroginal planted area and 70% reference site density. Restored sites will maintain a 75% of original planted area and 85% of the reference density for the following 2 years of monitoring (MW: unclear on this last point- does this mean yrs 3&4? they Only montored for 2.5 max).",N,ND,"See bolded values in table 3 (pg 20) for areal coverage success. For planted shoot densities, we estimated based on ""170 total bundles w/10-15 shoots in each within the 64m2 plot (0.5 m apart each). "" Using a median of 12.5 shoots per bundle. ",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,Y,"Grain size mentioned, but not reported in text. Could be available upon request",NA,ND,Y,"See appendix E- Algae, sponges, tunicates, mollusks, fish, inverts",Halibut,"Not quantitative, and only one table pooled across the entire project (no lists for each monitoring time point)",ND,NC,Y,ND,ND
OCCK_LivingShorelines_2016,OCCK_Eelgrass_PCH,OCCK_EelgrassPCH_12mo,Raw data,"OC CoastKeeper, CSU Fullerton",Newport Bay,PCH,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,NA,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,Popsicle Stick: DT- diver transplant.,NA,N,"Inner Linda Isla (close by in a small embayment, a muddier, lower flow site than the restoration site)",NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Did not use a reference meadow to note status of natural beds at the time of restoration,2016,June/July,Summer,3,"Months 12, 24, 36",12,NA,ND,NA,33.619319,-117.904836,4188,320,ND,26.12,110,43.3727,ND,NA,None defined,Y,ND,"Transplantation of 349 eelgrass bundles per plot. For the 3 plots planted in June, we planted 1,047 bundles, or approximately 12,564 eelgrass shoots. For the 5 plots planted in July, we planted 1,745 bundles, or approximately 20,940 eelgrass shoots. (349 bundles * 12 shoots /160 m2 = 26.12). Note, all data are the 'eelgrass only'- not the plots that had oysters next to them. However, they pooled the area estimates for both plots at the sites, which are the data reported here. The plots essentially grew together, making this tricky. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,N,Y,"Numerous infauna, inverts. Birds. Fish (species not reported)",ND,"The quantitatively assess species richness before and after restoration, but also in their oyster plots. Bird surveys showed no difference pre-and post restoration. ""All [eelgrass] sites had increased density and rarefied richness in May 2018, but overall decreased SimpsonÕs diversity compared to April 2017 (Figure 15)."" - March 2019 report","Y- showed an increase in sedimentation relative to controls, also say they measured TOC, but don't report results. Do note grain size is finer in restored, plots so may be significant. ",ND,ND,ND,ND
OCCK_LivingShorelines_2016,OCCK_Eelgrass_PCH,OCCK_EelgrassPCH_24mo,Raw data,"OC CoastKeeper, CSU Fullerton",Newport Bay,PCH,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,NA,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,Popsicle Stick: DT- diver transplant.,NA,N,"Inner Linda Isla (close by in a small embayment, a muddier, lower flow site than the restoration site)",NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Did not use a reference meadow to note status of natural beds at the time of restoration,2016,June/July,Summer,3,"Months 12, 24, 36",24,NA,ND,NA,33.619319,-117.904836,4188,320,1108,26.12,185.67,51.305,ND,NA,None defined,Y,ND,"Transplantation of 349 eelgrass bundles per plot. For the 3 plots planted in June, we planted 1,047 bundles, or approximately 12,564 eelgrass shoots. For the 5 plots planted in July, we planted 1,745 bundles, or approximately 20,940 eelgrass shoots. (349 bundles * 12 shoots /160 m2 = 26.12). Note, all data are the 'eelgrass only'- not the plots that had oysters next to them. However, they pooled the area estimates for both plots at the sites, which are the data reported here. The plots essentially grew together, making this tricky. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Y,Y,"Numerous infauna, inverts. Birds. Fish (species not reported)",ND,"The quantitatively assess species richness before and after restoration, but also in their oyster plots. Bird surveys showed no difference pre-and post restoration. ""All [eelgrass] sites had increased density and rarefied richness in May 2018, but overall decreased SimpsonÕs diversity compared to April 2017 (Figure 15)."" - March 2019 report","Y- showed an increase in sedimentation relative to controls, also say they measured TOC, but don't report results. Do note grain size is finer in restored, plots so may be significant. ",ND,ND,ND,ND
OCCK_LivingShorelines_2016,OCCK_Eelgrass_PCH,OCCK_EelgrassPCH_36mo,Raw data,"OC CoastKeeper, CSU Fullerton",Newport Bay,PCH,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,NA,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,Popsicle Stick: DT- diver transplant.,NA,N,"Inner Linda Isla (close by in a small embayment, a muddier, lower flow site than the restoration site)",NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Did not use a reference meadow to note status of natural beds at the time of restoration,2016,June/July,Summer,3,"Months 12, 24, 36",36,NA,ND,NA,33.619319,-117.904836,4188,320,ND,26.12,94.333,40.172,ND,NA,None defined,Y,ND,"Transplantation of 349 eelgrass bundles per plot. For the 3 plots planted in June, we planted 1,047 bundles, or approximately 12,564 eelgrass shoots. For the 5 plots planted in July, we planted 1,745 bundles, or approximately 20,940 eelgrass shoots. (349 bundles * 12 shoots /160 m2 = 26.12). Note, all data are the 'eelgrass only'- not the plots that had oysters next to them. However, they pooled the area estimates for both plots at the sites, which are the data reported here. The plots essentially grew together, making this tricky. ",N,Y,Y,N,N,Y,N,Y,Y,N,NA,N,Y,"Numerous infauna, inverts. Birds. Fish (species not reported)",ND,"The quantitatively assess species richness before and after restoration, but also in their oyster plots. Bird surveys showed no difference pre-and post restoration. ""All [eelgrass] sites had increased density and rarefied richness in May 2018, but overall decreased SimpsonÕs diversity compared to April 2017 (Figure 15)."" - March 2019 report","Y- showed an increase in sedimentation relative to controls, also say they measured TOC, but don't report results. Do note grain size is finer in restored, plots so may be significant. ",ND,ND,ND,ND
OCCK_LivingShorelines_2016,OCCK_Eelgrass_Westcliff,OCCK_EelgrassWestcliff_12mo,Raw data,"OC CoastKeeper, CSU Fullerton",Newport Bay,Westcliff,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,NA,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,Popsicle Stick: DT- diver transplant.,NA,N,"Inner Linda Isla (close by in a small embayment, a muddier, lower flow site than the restoration site)",NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Did not use a reference meadow to note status of natural beds at the time of restoration,2016,June/July,Summer,3,"Months 12, 24, 36",12,NA,ND,NA,33.621336,-117.902025,4188,320,ND,26.12,79,32.715,ND,NA,None defined,Y,ND,"Transplantation of 349 eelgrass bundles per plot. For the 3 plots planted in June, we planted 1,047 bundles, or approximately 12,564 eelgrass shoots. For the 5 plots planted in July, we planted 1,745 bundles, or approximately 20,940 eelgrass shoots. (349 bundles * 12 shoots /160 m2 = 26.12). Note, all data are the 'eelgrass only'- not the plots that had oysters next to them. However, they pooled the area estimates for both plots at the sites, which are the data reported here. The plots essentially grew together, making this tricky. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,N,Y,"Numerous infauna, inverts. Birds. Fish (species not reported)",ND,"The quantitatively assess species richness before and after restoration, but also in their oyster plots. Bird surveys showed no difference pre-and post restoration. ""All [eelgrass] sites had increased density and rarefied richness in May 2018, but overall decreased SimpsonÕs diversity compared to April 2017 (Figure 15)."" - March 2019 report","Y- showed an increase in sedimentation relative to controls, also say they measured TOC, but don't report results. Do note grain size is finer in restored, plots so may be significant. ",ND,ND,ND,ND
OCCK_LivingShorelines_2016,OCCK_Eelgrass_Westcliff,OCCK_EelgrassWestcliff_24mo,Raw data,"OC CoastKeeper, CSU Fullerton",Newport Bay,Westcliff,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,NA,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,Popsicle Stick: DT- diver transplant.,NA,N,"Inner Linda Isla (close by in a small embayment, a muddier, lower flow site than the restoration site)",NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Did not use a reference meadow to note status of natural beds at the time of restoration,2016,June/July,Summer,3,"Months 12, 24, 36",24,NA,ND,NA,33.621336,-117.902025,4188,320,854,26.12,117,55.867,ND,NA,None defined,Y,ND,"Transplantation of 349 eelgrass bundles per plot. For the 3 plots planted in June, we planted 1,047 bundles, or approximately 12,564 eelgrass shoots. For the 5 plots planted in July, we planted 1,745 bundles, or approximately 20,940 eelgrass shoots. (349 bundles * 12 shoots /160 m2 = 26.12). Note, all data are the 'eelgrass only'- not the plots that had oysters next to them. However, they pooled the area estimates for both plots at the sites, which are the data reported here. The plots essentially grew together, making this tricky. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Y,Y,"Numerous infauna, inverts. Birds. Fish (species not reported)",ND,"The quantitatively assess species richness before and after restoration, but also in their oyster plots. Bird surveys showed no difference pre-and post restoration. ""All [eelgrass] sites had increased density and rarefied richness in May 2018, but overall decreased SimpsonÕs diversity compared to April 2017 (Figure 15)."" - March 2019 report","Y- showed an increase in sedimentation relative to controls, also say they measured TOC, but don't report results. Do note grain size is finer in restored, plots so may be significant. ",ND,ND,ND,ND
OCCK_LivingShorelines_2016,OCCK_Eelgrass_Westcliff,OCCK_EelgrassWestcliff_36mo,Raw data,"OC CoastKeeper, CSU Fullerton",Newport Bay,Westcliff,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,NA,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,Popsicle Stick: DT- diver transplant.,NA,N,"Inner Linda Isla (close by in a small embayment, a muddier, lower flow site than the restoration site)",NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Did not use a reference meadow to note status of natural beds at the time of restoration,2016,June/July,Summer,3,"Months 12, 24, 36",36,NA,ND,NA,33.621336,-117.902025,4188,320,ND,26.12,80.333,48.321,ND,NA,None defined,Y,ND,"Transplantation of 349 eelgrass bundles per plot. For the 3 plots planted in June, we planted 1,047 bundles, or approximately 12,564 eelgrass shoots. For the 5 plots planted in July, we planted 1,745 bundles, or approximately 20,940 eelgrass shoots. (349 bundles * 12 shoots /160 m2 = 26.12). Note, all data are the 'eelgrass only'- not the plots that had oysters next to them. However, they pooled the area estimates for both plots at the sites, which are the data reported here. The plots essentially grew together, making this tricky. ",N,Y,Y,N,N,Y,N,Y,Y,N,NA,N,Y,"Numerous infauna, inverts. Birds. Fish (species not reported)",ND,"The quantitatively assess species richness before and after restoration, but also in their oyster plots. Bird surveys showed no difference pre-and post restoration. ""All [eelgrass] sites had increased density and rarefied richness in May 2018, but overall decreased SimpsonÕs diversity compared to April 2017 (Figure 15)."" - March 2019 report","Y- showed an increase in sedimentation relative to controls, also say they measured TOC, but don't report results. Do note grain size is finer in restored, plots so may be significant. ",ND,ND,ND,ND
OCCK_LivingShorelines_2016,OCCK_Eelgrass_DeAnza,OCCK_EelgrassDeAnza_12mo,Raw data,"OC CoastKeeper, CSU Fullerton",Newport Bay,De Anza,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,NA,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,Popsicle Stick: DT- diver transplant.,NA,N,"Inner Linda Isla (close by in a small embayment, a muddier, lower flow site than the restoration site)",NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Did not use a reference meadow to note status of natural beds at the time of restoration,2016,June/July,Summer,3,"Months 12, 24, 36",12,NA,ND,NA,33.620328,-117.898558,4188,320,ND,26.12,133.67,73.83,ND,NA,None defined,Y,ND,"Transplantation of 349 eelgrass bundles per plot. For the 3 plots planted in June, we planted 1,047 bundles, or approximately 12,564 eelgrass shoots. For the 5 plots planted in July, we planted 1,745 bundles, or approximately 20,940 eelgrass shoots. (349 bundles * 12 shoots /160 m2 = 26.12). Note, all data are the 'eelgrass only'- not the plots that had oysters next to them. However, they pooled the area estimates for both plots at the sites, which are the data reported here. The plots essentially grew together, making this tricky. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,Y- wave attenuation via water level loggers? Results incoclusive. ,NA,N,Y,"Numerous infauna, inverts. Birds. Fish (species not reported)",ND,"The quantitatively assess species richness before and after restoration, but also in their oyster plots. Bird surveys showed no difference pre-and post restoration. ""All [eelgrass] sites had increased density and rarefied richness in May 2018, but overall decreased SimpsonÕs diversity compared to April 2017 (Figure 15)."" - March 2019 report","Y- showed an increase in sedimentation relative to controls, also say they measured TOC, but don't report results. Do note grain size is finer in restored, plots so may be significant. ",ND,ND,ND,Y- wave attenuation via water level loggers? Results incoclusive. 
OCCK_LivingShorelines_2016,OCCK_Eelgrass_DeAnza,OCCK_EelgrassDeAnza_24mo,Raw data,"OC CoastKeeper, CSU Fullerton",Newport Bay,De Anza,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,NA,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,Popsicle Stick: DT- diver transplant.,NA,N,"Inner Linda Isla (close by in a small embayment, a muddier, lower flow site than the restoration site)",NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Did not use a reference meadow to note status of natural beds at the time of restoration,2016,June/July,Summer,3,"Months 12, 24, 36",24,NA,ND,NA,33.620328,-117.898558,4188,320,1667.1,26.12,204,56.074,ND,NA,None defined,Y,ND,"Transplantation of 349 eelgrass bundles per plot. For the 3 plots planted in June, we planted 1,047 bundles, or approximately 12,564 eelgrass shoots. For the 5 plots planted in July, we planted 1,745 bundles, or approximately 20,940 eelgrass shoots. (349 bundles * 12 shoots /160 m2 = 26.12). Note, all data are the 'eelgrass only'- not the plots that had oysters next to them. However, they pooled the area estimates for both plots at the sites, which are the data reported here. The plots essentially grew together, making this tricky. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Y,Y,"Numerous infauna, inverts. Birds. Fish (species not reported)",ND,"The quantitatively assess species richness before and after restoration, but also in their oyster plots. Bird surveys showed no difference pre-and post restoration. ""All [eelgrass] sites had increased density and rarefied richness in May 2018, but overall decreased SimpsonÕs diversity compared to April 2017 (Figure 15)."" - March 2019 report","Y- showed an increase in sedimentation relative to controls, also say they measured TOC, but don't report results. Do note grain size is finer in restored, plots so may be significant. ",ND,ND,ND,ND
OCCK_LivingShorelines_2016,OCCK_Eelgrass_DeAnza,OCCK_EelgrassDeAnza_36mo,Raw data,"OC CoastKeeper, CSU Fullerton",Newport Bay,De Anza,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,NA,N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,Popsicle Stick: DT- diver transplant.,NA,N,"Inner Linda Isla (close by in a small embayment, a muddier, lower flow site than the restoration site)",NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Did not use a reference meadow to note status of natural beds at the time of restoration,2016,June/July,Summer,3,"Months 12, 24, 36",36,NA,ND,NA,33.620328,-117.898558,4188,320,ND,26.12,29,42.842,ND,NA,None defined,Y,ND,"Transplantation of 349 eelgrass bundles per plot. For the 3 plots planted in June, we planted 1,047 bundles, or approximately 12,564 eelgrass shoots. For the 5 plots planted in July, we planted 1,745 bundles, or approximately 20,940 eelgrass shoots. (349 bundles * 12 shoots /160 m2 = 26.12). Note, all data are the 'eelgrass only'- not the plots that had oysters next to them. However, they pooled the area estimates for both plots at the sites, which are the data reported here. The plots essentially grew together, making this tricky. ",N,Y,Y,N,N,Y,N,Y,Y,N,NA,N,Y,"Numerous infauna, inverts. Birds. Fish (species not reported)",ND,"The quantitatively assess species richness before and after restoration, but also in their oyster plots. Bird surveys showed no difference pre-and post restoration. ""All [eelgrass] sites had increased density and rarefied richness in May 2018, but overall decreased SimpsonÕs diversity compared to April 2017 (Figure 15)."" - March 2019 report","Y- showed an increase in sedimentation relative to controls, also say they measured TOC, but don't report results. Do note grain size is finer in restored, plots so may be significant. ",ND,ND,ND,ND
OCCK_LivingShorelines_2016,OCCK_Eelgrass_Shellmaker,OCCK_EelgrassShellmaker_12mo,Raw data,"OC CoastKeeper, CSU Fullerton",Newport Bay,Shellmaker,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,NA,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,Popsicle Stick: DT- diver transplant.,"Loss of eelgrass, so replanted 1 yr after restoration on deep edge.",N,"Inner Linda Isla (close by in a small embayment, a muddier, lower flow site than the restoration site)",NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Did not use a reference meadow to note status of natural beds at the time of restoration,2016,June/July,Summer,3,"Months 12, 24, 36",12,NA,ND,NA,33.622667,-117.892275,4188,320,ND,26.12,19,35.371,ND,NA,None defined,N,ND,"Transplantation of 349 eelgrass bundles per plot. For the 3 plots planted in June, we planted 1,047 bundles, or approximately 12,564 eelgrass shoots. For the 5 plots planted in July, we planted 1,745 bundles, or approximately 20,940 eelgrass shoots. (349 bundles * 12 shoots /160 m2 = 26.12). Note, all data are the 'eelgrass only'- not the plots that had oysters next to them. However, they pooled the area estimates for both plots at the sites, which are the data reported here. The plots essentially grew together, making this tricky. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,N,Y,"Numerous infauna, inverts. Birds. Fish (species not reported)",ND,"The quantitatively assess species richness before and after restoration, but also in their oyster plots. Bird surveys showed no difference pre-and post restoration. ""All [eelgrass] sites had increased density and rarefied richness in May 2018, but overall decreased SimpsonÕs diversity compared to April 2017 (Figure 15)."" - March 2019 report","Y- showed an increase in sedimentation relative to controls, also say they measured TOC, but don't report results. Do note grain size is finer in restored, plots so may be significant. ",ND,ND,ND,ND
OCCK_LivingShorelines_2016,OCCK_Eelgrass_Shellmaker,OCCK_EelgrassShellmaker_24mo,Raw data,"OC CoastKeeper, CSU Fullerton",Newport Bay,Shellmaker,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,NA,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,Popsicle Stick: DT- diver transplant.,"Loss of eelgrass, so replanted 1 yr after restoration on deep edge.",N,"Inner Linda Isla (close by in a small embayment, a muddier, lower flow site than the restoration site)",NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Did not use a reference meadow to note status of natural beds at the time of restoration,2016,June/July,Summer,3,"Months 12, 24, 36",24,NA,ND,NA,33.622667,-117.892275,4188,320,146.7,26.12,98.33,122.637,ND,NA,None defined,N,ND,"Transplantation of 349 eelgrass bundles per plot. For the 3 plots planted in June, we planted 1,047 bundles, or approximately 12,564 eelgrass shoots. For the 5 plots planted in July, we planted 1,745 bundles, or approximately 20,940 eelgrass shoots. (349 bundles * 12 shoots /160 m2 = 26.12). Note, all data are the 'eelgrass only'- not the plots that had oysters next to them. However, they pooled the area estimates for both plots at the sites, which are the data reported here. The plots essentially grew together, making this tricky. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Y,Y,"Numerous infauna, inverts. Birds. Fish (species not reported)",ND,"The quantitatively assess species richness before and after restoration, but also in their oyster plots. Bird surveys showed no difference pre-and post restoration. ""All [eelgrass] sites had increased density and rarefied richness in May 2018, but overall decreased SimpsonÕs diversity compared to April 2017 (Figure 15)."" - March 2019 report","Y- showed an increase in sedimentation relative to controls, also say they measured TOC, but don't report results. Do note grain size is finer in restored, plots so may be significant. ",ND,ND,ND,ND
OCCK_LivingShorelines_2016,OCCK_Eelgrass_Shellmaker,OCCK_EelgrassShellmaker_36mo,Raw data,"OC CoastKeeper, CSU Fullerton",Newport Bay,Shellmaker,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,NA,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,Popsicle Stick: DT- diver transplant.,"Loss of eelgrass, so replanted 1 yr after restoration on deep edge.",N,"Inner Linda Isla (close by in a small embayment, a muddier, lower flow site than the restoration site)",NA,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Did not use a reference meadow to note status of natural beds at the time of restoration,2016,June/July,Summer,3,"Months 12, 24, 36",36,NA,ND,NA,33.622667,-117.892275,4188,320,ND,26.12,49.667,55.425,ND,NA,None defined,N,ND,"Transplantation of 349 eelgrass bundles per plot. For the 3 plots planted in June, we planted 1,047 bundles, or approximately 12,564 eelgrass shoots. For the 5 plots planted in July, we planted 1,745 bundles, or approximately 20,940 eelgrass shoots. (349 bundles * 12 shoots /160 m2 = 26.12). Note, all data are the 'eelgrass only'- not the plots that had oysters next to them. However, they pooled the area estimates for both plots at the sites, which are the data reported here. The plots essentially grew together, making this tricky. ",N,Y,Y,N,N,Y,N,Y,Y,N,NA,N,Y,"Numerous infauna, inverts. Birds. Fish (species not reported)",ND,"The quantitatively assess species richness before and after restoration, but also in their oyster plots. Bird surveys showed no difference pre-and post restoration. ""All [eelgrass] sites had increased density and rarefied richness in May 2018, but overall decreased SimpsonÕs diversity compared to April 2017 (Figure 15)."" - March 2019 report","Y- showed an increase in sedimentation relative to controls, also say they measured TOC, but don't report results. Do note grain size is finer in restored, plots so may be significant. ",ND,ND,ND,ND
Seaworld_mitigation,Seaworld_Plot1of1,Seaworld_6mo,Grey literature,Merkel,Mission Bay,Seaworld Lagoon,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,NA,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,No method reported - but likely the same as other merkel project in this time and region,"They say details of restoration methodology are in a 1995 Merkel report entitled 'Mission Bay South Cove and Ventura Cove Eelgrass Planting Program', but I can't find a copy of this report",N,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,ND,1991,June,Summer,5,"Months 1, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",6,3.125,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,1173.588,ND,12,138.4,ND,ND,NA,"1:1 area ratio must be mitigated (only area, no shoot density criteria)",NA,NA,"Project only measure areal success as a success criteria. Old reports, often very little info. They use such a high mitigation ratio because they fille din shallower areas which then became suitable for eelgrass, and are 'banking' this mitigation for furutre projects. I calculate the tranplant densities: ""8 to 12 per tranplant, ~3foot center (see notes)"" = median of 10 per transplant on 3ft centers, or 10 shoots/9ft2 = 12 shoots/m2",N,N,N,N,N,N,Anecdotal,ND,ND,ND,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,NA,N,N,N,N,N
Seaworld_mitigation,Seaworld_Plot1of1,Seaworld_12mo,Grey literature,Merkel,Mission Bay,Seaworld Lagoon,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,NA,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,No method reported - but likely the same as other merkel project in this time and region,"They say details of restoration methodology are in a 1995 Merkel report entitled 'Mission Bay South Cove and Ventura Cove Eelgrass Planting Program', but I can't find a copy of this report",N,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,ND,1991,June,Summer,5,"Months 1, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",12,3.125,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,1173.588,1369.855314,12,400,ND,ND,NA,"1:1 area ratio must be mitigated (only area, no shoot density criteria)",Y,NA,"Project only measure areal success as a success criteria. Old reports, often very little info. They use such a high mitigation ratio because they fille din shallower areas which then became suitable for eelgrass, and are 'banking' this mitigation for furutre projects. I calculate the tranplant densities: ""8 to 12 per tranplant, ~3foot center (see notes)"" = median of 10 per transplant on 3ft centers, or 10 shoots/9ft2 = 12 shoots/m2",N,N,N,N,N,N,Anecdotal,ND,ND,ND,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,NA,N,N,N,N,N
Seaworld_mitigation,Seaworld_Plot1of1,Seaworld_24mo,Grey literature,Merkel,Mission Bay,Seaworld Lagoon,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,NA,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,No method reported - but likely the same as other merkel project in this time and region,"They say details of restoration methodology are in a 1995 Merkel report entitled 'Mission Bay South Cove and Ventura Cove Eelgrass Planting Program', but I can't find a copy of this report",N,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,ND,1991,June,Summer,5,"Months 1, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",24,3.125,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,1173.588,1832.218506,12,ND,ND,ND,NA,"1:1 area ratio must be mitigated (only area, no shoot density criteria)",Y,NA,"Project only measure areal success as a success criteria. Old reports, often very little info. They use such a high mitigation ratio because they fille din shallower areas which then became suitable for eelgrass, and are 'banking' this mitigation for furutre projects. I calculate the tranplant densities: ""8 to 12 per tranplant, ~3foot center (see notes)"" = median of 10 per transplant on 3ft centers, or 10 shoots/9ft2 = 12 shoots/m2",N,N,N,N,N,N,Anecdotal,ND,ND,ND,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,NA,N,N,N,N,N
Seaworld_mitigation,Seaworld_Plot1of1,Seaworld_36mo,Grey literature,Merkel,Mission Bay,Seaworld Lagoon,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,NA,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,No method reported - but likely the same as other merkel project in this time and region,"They say details of restoration methodology are in a 1995 Merkel report entitled 'Mission Bay South Cove and Ventura Cove Eelgrass Planting Program', but I can't find a copy of this report",N,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,ND,1991,June,Summer,5,"Months 1, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",36,3.125,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,1173.588,2503.901895,12,219.2,42.7,ND,NA,"1:1 area ratio must be mitigated (only area, no shoot density criteria)",Y,NA,"Project only measure areal success as a success criteria. Old reports, often very little info. They use such a high mitigation ratio because they fille din shallower areas which then became suitable for eelgrass, and are 'banking' this mitigation for furutre projects. I calculate the tranplant densities: ""8 to 12 per tranplant, ~3foot center (see notes)"" = median of 10 per transplant on 3ft centers, or 10 shoots/9ft2 = 12 shoots/m2",N,N,N,N,N,N,Anecdotal,ND,ND,ND,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,NA,N,N,N,N,N
Seaworld_mitigation,Seaworld_Plot1of1,Seaworld_48mo,Grey literature,Merkel,Mission Bay,Seaworld Lagoon,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,NA,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,No method reported - but likely the same as other merkel project in this time and region,"They say details of restoration methodology are in a 1995 Merkel report entitled 'Mission Bay South Cove and Ventura Cove Eelgrass Planting Program', but I can't find a copy of this report",N,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,ND,1991,June,Summer,5,"Months 1, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",48,3.125,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,1173.588,2691.007061,12,440,86.41,ND,NA,"1:1 area ratio must be mitigated (only area, no shoot density criteria)",Y,NA,"Project only measure areal success as a success criteria. Old reports, often very little info. They use such a high mitigation ratio because they fille din shallower areas which then became suitable for eelgrass, and are 'banking' this mitigation for furutre projects. I calculate the tranplant densities: ""8 to 12 per tranplant, ~3foot center (see notes)"" = median of 10 per transplant on 3ft centers, or 10 shoots/9ft2 = 12 shoots/m2",N,N,N,N,N,N,Anecdotal,ND,ND,ND,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,NA,N,N,N,N,N
Seaworld_mitigation,Seaworld_Plot1of1,Seaworld_60mo,Grey literature,Merkel,Mission Bay,Seaworld Lagoon,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,NA,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,No method reported - but likely the same as other merkel project in this time and region,"They say details of restoration methodology are in a 1995 Merkel report entitled 'Mission Bay South Cove and Ventura Cove Eelgrass Planting Program', but I can't find a copy of this report",N,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,ND,1991,June,Summer,5,"Months 1, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",60,3.125,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,1173.588,2398.272018,12,353.6,54.49,ND,NA,"1:1 area ratio must be mitigated (only area, no shoot density criteria)",Y,NA,"Project only measure areal success as a success criteria. Old reports, often very little info. They use such a high mitigation ratio because they fille din shallower areas which then became suitable for eelgrass, and are 'banking' this mitigation for furutre projects. I calculate the tranplant densities: ""8 to 12 per tranplant, ~3foot center (see notes)"" = median of 10 per transplant on 3ft centers, or 10 shoots/9ft2 = 12 shoots/m2",N,N,N,N,N,N,Anecdotal,ND,ND,ND,NA,N,Y,Fish and invertebrates,ND,N- just qualitative,N,N,N,N,N
GloriettaBay,GloriettaBay_plot1of1,Glorietta_6mo,Grey literature,Merkel,San Diego Bay ,Glorietta Bay Marina Eelgrass Mitigation Project,32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,NA,ND,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,Report writes 'The transplant was conducted in May 2007 in accordance with the mitigation plan prepared for this Project (M&A 2006)' but can't find this report referecned anywhere online,*They used dredge material to create the depth/shoal for the new restoration area. Made a buttress to retain sediment and then make habitat suitable. See report pg 3,Y,ND,800,722,240,ND,276.9,ND,NA,NA,"Used a reference meadow. Show decreases in shoot density over time as well, but the variability is high enough that it is not significant looking- hwoever, they don't report the SDs in text, only shor plots with error bars in Fig. 4. Could request raw data if need be. ",2007,May,Spring,5,"Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",9,4.5,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,2024,1367,8,139.2,81.6,ND,NA,A minimum of 70 percent areal coverage and 30 percent density should be achieved after the first year.,NA,Y,"Met success criteria, but note that the mitigation ratino was super high, sp areal success was very easy (over 400%). Can't find 6 and 12 month reports, so don't have shoot denisty SD data, Note: Report calls this months six, but in the appendix you learn it was actually done int February, 9 months after initial planting. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
GloriettaBay,GloriettaBay_plot1of1,Glorietta_12mo,Grey literature,Merkel,San Diego Bay ,Glorietta Bay Marina Eelgrass Mitigation Project,32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,NA,ND,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,Report writes 'The transplant was conducted in May 2007 in accordance with the mitigation plan prepared for this Project (M&A 2006)' but can't find this report referecned anywhere online,*They used dredge material to create the depth/shoal for the new restoration area. Made a buttress to retain sediment and then make habitat suitable. See report pg 3,Y,ND,800,585,240,ND,182.4,ND,NA,NA,"Used a reference meadow. Show decreases in shoot density over time as well, but the variability is high enough that it is not significant looking- hwoever, they don't report the SDs in text, only shor plots with error bars in Fig. 4. Could request raw data if need be. ",2007,May,Spring,5,"Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",12,4.5,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,2024,1442,8,132.8,39.9,ND,NA,A minimum of 70 percent areal coverage and 30 percent density should be achieved after the first year.,Y,Y,"Met success criteria, but note that the mitigation ratino was super high, sp areal success was very easy (over 400%). Can't find 6 and 12 month reports, so don't have shoot denisty SD data",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
GloriettaBay,GloriettaBay_plot1of1,Glorietta_24mo,Grey literature,Merkel,San Diego Bay ,Glorietta Bay Marina Eelgrass Mitigation Project,32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,NA,ND,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,Report writes 'The transplant was conducted in May 2007 in accordance with the mitigation plan prepared for this Project (M&A 2006)' but can't find this report referecned anywhere online,*They used dredge material to create the depth/shoal for the new restoration area. Made a buttress to retain sediment and then make habitat suitable. See report pg 3,Y,ND,800,776,240,ND,227.2,192.6,NA,NA,"Used a reference meadow. Show decreases in shoot density over time as well, but the variability is high enough that it is not significant looking- hwoever, they don't report the SDs in text, only shor plots with error bars in Fig. 4. Could request raw data if need be. ",2007,May,Spring,5,"Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",24,4.5,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,2024,2303,8,264,153.9,ND,NA,A minimum of 70 percent areal coverage and 30 percent density should be achieved after the first year.,Y,Y,"Met success criteria, but note that the mitigation ratino was super high, sp areal success was very easy (over 400%). Can't find 6 and 12 month reports, so don't have shoot denisty SD data",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
GloriettaBay,GloriettaBay_plot1of1,Glorietta_36mo,Grey literature,Merkel,San Diego Bay ,Glorietta Bay Marina Eelgrass Mitigation Project,32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,NA,ND,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,Report writes 'The transplant was conducted in May 2007 in accordance with the mitigation plan prepared for this Project (M&A 2006)' but can't find this report referecned anywhere online,*They used dredge material to create the depth/shoal for the new restoration area. Made a buttress to retain sediment and then make habitat suitable. See report pg 3,Y,ND,800,800,240,ND,168.3,97.3,NA,NA,"Used a reference meadow. Show decreases in shoot density over time as well, but the variability is high enough that it is not significant looking- hwoever, they don't report the SDs in text, only shor plots with error bars in Fig. 4. Could request raw data if need be. ",2007,May,Spring,5,"Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",36,4.5,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,2024,2231,8,91.2,75.6,ND,NA,A minimum of 70 percent areal coverage and 30 percent density should be achieved after the first year.,Y,Y,"Met success criteria, but note that the mitigation ratino was super high, sp areal success was very easy (over 400%). Can't find 6 and 12 month reports, so don't have shoot denisty SD data",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
GloriettaBay,GloriettaBay_plot1of1,Glorietta_48mo,Grey literature,Merkel,San Diego Bay ,Glorietta Bay Marina Eelgrass Mitigation Project,32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,NA,ND,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,Report writes 'The transplant was conducted in May 2007 in accordance with the mitigation plan prepared for this Project (M&A 2006)' but can't find this report referecned anywhere online,*They used dredge material to create the depth/shoal for the new restoration area. Made a buttress to retain sediment and then make habitat suitable. See report pg 3,Y,ND,800,784,240,ND,126.2,67.9,NA,NA,"Used a reference meadow. Show decreases in shoot density over time as well, but the variability is high enough that it is not significant looking- hwoever, they don't report the SDs in text, only shor plots with error bars in Fig. 4. Could request raw data if need be. ",2007,May,Spring,5,"Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",48,4.5,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,2024,2249,8,131.2,68.2,ND,NA,A minimum of 70 percent areal coverage and 30 percent density should be achieved after the first year.,Y,Y,"Met success criteria, but note that the mitigation ratino was super high, sp areal success was very easy (over 400%). Can't find 6 and 12 month reports, so don't have shoot denisty SD data",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
GloriettaBay,GloriettaBay_plot1of1,Glorietta_60mo,Grey literature,Merkel,San Diego Bay ,Glorietta Bay Marina Eelgrass Mitigation Project,32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,NA,ND,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,Report writes 'The transplant was conducted in May 2007 in accordance with the mitigation plan prepared for this Project (M&A 2006)' but can't find this report referecned anywhere online,*They used dredge material to create the depth/shoal for the new restoration area. Made a buttress to retain sediment and then make habitat suitable. See report pg 3,Y,ND,800,674,240,ND,191.2,52.8,NA,NA,"Used a reference meadow. Show decreases in shoot density over time as well, but the variability is high enough that it is not significant looking- hwoever, they don't report the SDs in text, only shor plots with error bars in Fig. 4. Could request raw data if need be. ",2007,May,Spring,5,"Months 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",60,4.5,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,2024,2381,8,175.2,57.5,ND,NA,"A minimum of 100 percent areal coverage and 85 percent density should be achieved for the third, fourth, and fifth years. (Eelgrass  density  at  60  months  is  92%  of  the  turion  density  relative  to  the  reference  site,  which  exceeds  the  SCEMP  requirement  of  85%.)",Y,Y,"Met success criteria, but note that the mitigation ratino was super high, sp areal success was very easy (over 400%). Can't find 6 and 12 month reports, so don't have shoot denisty SD data",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SD_ConvairLagoon,SD_ConvairLagoon_plot1of1,SD_ConvairLagoon_6mo,Grey literature,MBC Appplied Environmental Services,San Diego Bay ,Convair Lagoon,32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,"Abundance of native rays may have inhibited success in some areas. Also not high abundance of japanses mussel (M. senhousei), but don't think it is directly affecting the eelgrass distribution. ",N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,"Bundles of 10-15 bare root plantings with a subsurface anchor device (stick). The added in additional tranplants mid-project in June 2001, adding 3000 more bundles or 0.74 more acres due to large barren areas. ",Planted at a minimum of 1 bundle per sq meter. ,Y,"Two donor beds, one in Mission Bay (North Cove) and one in San Diego Harbor (Tidelands Park, Coronado). No more than 10% of donor bed was harvested",ND,ND,304,ND,234,ND,NA,NA,NA,1998,May to July,Summer,5,"Months 0, 3, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 48, 60",6,1.217,ND,NA,NA,NA,"280,488",23188.49,9348.238,12.3,7.2,ND,41,NA,A minimum of 70 percent areal coverage and 30 percent density should be achieved after the first year. ,NA,NA,"Note that the goal post were moved a bit here at year 3. The project was originally unsuccessful in terms of meeting mitigation requirements, but they lowered the total area required very late in the project after failures... They also transplanted again at year 3. The 5.73 number comes from the initial survey file (not actually in the first monitoring report). ~12 turions per bundle planted, 23,274 bundles planted",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,Y,"Many: Spinsy loster, turbot, anchovy, sardine, nudibranchs, surfperch, kelp bass, spotted bass, sargo, yellowfin coaker, opaleye, topsmelt, corbina. ",Y,"Spiny lobster, anchovy, saridine, turbot, California Halibut",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SD_ConvairLagoon,SD_ConvairLagoon_plot1of1,SD_ConvairLagoon_12mo,Grey literature,MBC Appplied Environmental Services,San Diego Bay ,Convair Lagoon,32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,"Abundance of native rays may have inhibited success in some areas. Also not high abundance of japanses mussel (M. senhousei), but don't think it is directly affecting the eelgrass distribution. ",N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,"Bundles of 10-15 bare root plantings with a subsurface anchor device (stick). The added in additional tranplants mid-project in June 2001, adding 3000 more bundles or 0.74 more acres due to large barren areas. ",Planted at a minimum of 1 bundle per sq meter. ,Y,"Two donor beds, one in Mission Bay (North Cove) and one in San Diego Harbor (Tidelands Park, Coronado). No more than 10% of donor bed was harvested",ND,ND,304,ND,154,ND,NA,NA,NA,1998,May to July,Summer,5,"Months 0, 3, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 48, 60",12,1.217,ND,NA,NA,NA,"280,488",23188.49,13111.81,12.3,106.3,ND,57,NA,A minimum of 70 percent areal coverage and 30 percent density should be achieved after the first year. ,N,Y,"Note that the goal post were moved a bit here at year 3. The project was originally unsuccessful in terms of meeting mitigation requirements, but they lowered the total area required very late in the project after failures... They also transplanted again at year 3. The 5.73 number comes from the initial survey file (not actually in the first monitoring report). ~12 turions per bundle planted, 23,274 bundles planted",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,Y,"Many: Spinsy loster, turbot, anchovy, sardine, nudibranchs, surfperch, kelp bass, spotted bass, sargo, yellowfin coaker, opaleye, topsmelt, corbina. ",Y,"Spiny lobster, anchovy, saridine, turbot, California Halibut",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SD_ConvairLagoon,SD_ConvairLagoon_plot1of1,SD_ConvairLagoon_60mo,Grey literature,MBC Appplied Environmental Services,San Diego Bay ,Convair Lagoon,32.68,-117.175,S. Cal,Abundance of native rays may have inhibited success in some areas,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,"Bundles of 10-15 bare root plantings with a subsurface anchor device (stick). The added in additional tranplants mid-project in June 2001, adding 3000 more bundles or 0.74 more acres due to large barren areas. ",Planted at a minimum of 1 bundle per sq meter. ,Y,"Two donor beds, one in Mission Bay (North Cove) and one in San Diego Harbor (Tidelands Park, Coronado). No more than 10% of donor bed was harvested",ND,ND,304,ND,304.8,ND,NA,NA,NA,"1998, 2001",May to July,Summer,5,"Months 0, 3, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 48, 60",60,1.657,ND,NA,NA,NA,"280,488",23188.49,17118.2,12.3,ND,ND,ND,NA,5 yr areal coverage requirements of 100% and the density requirement of 85%. ,Y,Y,"Note that the goal post were moved a bit here at year 3. The project was originally unsuccessful in terms of meeting mitigation requirements, but they lowered the total area required very late in the project after failures... They also transplanted again at year 3. The 5.73 number comes from the initial survey file (not actually in the first monitoring report). ~12 turions per bundle planted, 23,274 bundles planted",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,Y,"Many: Spinsy loster, turbot, anchovy, sardine, nudibranchs, surfperch, kelp bass, spotted bass, sargo, yellowfin coaker, opaleye, topsmelt, corbina. ",Y,"Spiny lobster, anchovy, saridine, turbot, California Halibut",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MissionBayDredge_2010,MissionBayDredge_2010_MarBasin,MissionBayDredge2010_MarinersBasinZM_6mo,Grey literature,Merkel,Mission Bay,Mission Bay Harbor Eelgrass Mitigation Project,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,NA,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Biodegradable Soft Anchors'- (from past Merkel report from this era, this means 'a cotton line collar and a pliable paper anchor which is planted parallel to the sediment surface (~10am below the surface) the anchor is made from paper sticks... like those used by candy manufacturers to create cand such as lollipops'. Calling this ""popsicle stick"" as it is very similar. ","ELVS site suitability used. Interstingly, they also do experimental Zostera pacifica transplants. ",Y,"MB-REF2' - (One donor bed per tranplant site, the two reported here are the two immediately next to their respective transplant sites. )",ND,768.9027,ND,ND,122,47.7,NA,NA,Cannot find the shoot densities or size of the reference meadows at the time of tranplant. Could email to ask. ,2011,October,Fall,5,"Months 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",6,6.8,ND,NA,NA,NA,3800,3804.045,121.4057,3,145.1,52.2,ND,NA,A minimum of 70 percent areal coverage and 30 percent density should be achieved after the first year. ,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MissionBayDredge_2010,MissionBayDredge_2010_MarBasin,MissionBayDredge2010_MarinersBasinZM_12mo,Grey literature,Merkel,Mission Bay,Mission Bay Harbor Eelgrass Mitigation Project,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,NA,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Biodegradable Soft Anchors'- (from past Merkel report from this era, this means 'a cotton line collar and a pliable paper anchor which is planted parallel to the sediment surface (~10am below the surface) the anchor is made from paper sticks... like those used by candy manufacturers to create cand such as lollipops'. Calling this ""popsicle stick"" as it is very similar. ","ELVS site suitability used. Interstingly, they also do experimental Zostera pacifica transplants. ",Y,"MB-REF2' - (One donor bed per tranplant site, the two reported here are the two immediately next to their respective transplant sites. )",ND,930.777,ND,ND,237.9,75.7,NA,NA,Cannot find the shoot densities or size of the reference meadows at the time of tranplant. Could email to ask. ,2011,October,Fall,5,"Months 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",12,6.8,ND,NA,NA,NA,3800,3804.045,404.686,3,92.8,43.7,ND,NA,A minimum of 70 percent areal coverage and 30 percent density should be achieved after the first year. ,N,Y,"This site failed its own areal success criteria (not 70%, but the entire project met the criteria due to additional 2 areas where they planted both z marina and z pacifica. These two sites were not pulled because they were z pacifica restoration, thus out of scope for this project)",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MissionBayDredge_2010,MissionBayDredge_2010_MarBasin,MissionBayDredge2010_MarinersBasinZM_24mo,Grey literature,Merkel,Mission Bay,Mission Bay Harbor Eelgrass Mitigation Project,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,NA,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Biodegradable Soft Anchors'- (from past Merkel report from this era, this means 'a cotton line collar and a pliable paper anchor which is planted parallel to the sediment surface (~10am below the surface) the anchor is made from paper sticks... like those used by candy manufacturers to create cand such as lollipops'. Calling this ""popsicle stick"" as it is very similar. ","ELVS site suitability used. Interstingly, they also do experimental Zostera pacifica transplants. ",Y,"MB-REF2' - (One donor bed per tranplant site, the two reported here are the two immediately next to their respective transplant sites. )",ND,445.1542,ND,ND,105.6,58.6,NA,NA,Cannot find the shoot densities or size of the reference meadows at the time of tranplant. Could email to ask. ,2011,October,Fall,5,"Months 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",24,6.8,ND,NA,NA,NA,3800,3804.045,728.4342,3,158.9,80,ND,NA,A minimum of 85 percent areal coverage and 70 percent density should beachieved after the second year.,N,Y,"Neither the specific site, nor all the sites combined met areal converage required. On average over all 4 sites, it was 84% covereage (rather than 85% to meet criteria)",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MissionBayDredge_2010,MissionBayDredge_2010_MBChan,MissionBayDredge2010_MBChannelZM_6mo,Grey literature,Merkel,Mission Bay,Mission Bay Harbor Eelgrass Mitigation Project,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,NA,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Biodegradable Soft Anchors'- (from past Merkel report from this era, this means 'a cotton line collar and a pliable paper anchor which is planted parallel to the sediment surface (~10am below the surface) the anchor is made from paper sticks... like those used by candy manufacturers to create cand such as lollipops'. Calling this ""popsicle stick"" as it is very similar. ","ELVS site suitability used. Interstingly, they also do experimental Zostera pacifica transplants. ",Y,"MBC-REF2' - (One donor bed per tranplant site, the two reported here are the two immediately next to their respective transplant sites. )",ND,1982.96,ND,ND,494.5,51.3,NA,NA,Cannot find the shoot densities or size of the reference meadows at the time of tranplant. Could email to ask. ,2011,October,Fall,5,"Months 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",6,6.8,ND,NA,NA,NA,875,1902.023,283.2799,3,121.3,73.3,ND,NA,A minimum of 70 percent areal coverage and 30 percent density should be achieved after the first year. ,NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MissionBayDredge_2010,MissionBayDredge_2010_MBChan,MissionBayDredge2010_MBChannelZM_12mo,Grey literature,Merkel,Mission Bay,Mission Bay Harbor Eelgrass Mitigation Project,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,NA,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Biodegradable Soft Anchors'- (from past Merkel report from this era, this means 'a cotton line collar and a pliable paper anchor which is planted parallel to the sediment surface (~10am below the surface) the anchor is made from paper sticks... like those used by candy manufacturers to create cand such as lollipops'. Calling this ""popsicle stick"" as it is very similar. ","ELVS site suitability used. Interstingly, they also do experimental Zostera pacifica transplants. ",Y,"MBC-REF2' - (One donor bed per tranplant site, the two reported here are the two immediately next to their respective transplant sites. )",ND,2023.43,ND,ND,220.8,72.4,NA,NA,Cannot find the shoot densities or size of the reference meadows at the time of tranplant. Could email to ask. ,2011,October,Fall,5,"Months 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",12,6.8,ND,NA,NA,NA,875,1902.023,202.3428,3,177.1,65.8,ND,NA,A minimum of 70 percent areal coverage and 30 percent density should be achieved after the first year. ,N,Y,"This site failed its own areal success criteria (not 70%, but the entire project met the criteria due to additional 2 areas where they planted both z marina and z pacifica. These two sites were not pulled because they were z pacifica restoration, thus out of scope for this project)",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MissionBayDredge_2010,MissionBayDredge_2010_MBChan,MissionBayDredge2010_MBChannelZM_24mo,Grey literature,Merkel,Mission Bay,Mission Bay Harbor Eelgrass Mitigation Project,32.76,-117.25,S. Cal,NA,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Biodegradable Soft Anchors'- (from past Merkel report from this era, this means 'a cotton line collar and a pliable paper anchor which is planted parallel to the sediment surface (~10am below the surface) the anchor is made from paper sticks... like those used by candy manufacturers to create cand such as lollipops'. Calling this ""popsicle stick"" as it is very similar. ","ELVS site suitability used. Interstingly, they also do experimental Zostera pacifica transplants. ",Y,"MBC-REF2' - (One donor bed per tranplant site, the two reported here are the two immediately next to their respective transplant sites. )",ND,1942.491,ND,ND,467.2,157,NA,NA,Cannot find the shoot densities or size of the reference meadows at the time of tranplant. Could email to ask. ,2011,October,Fall,5,"Months 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",24,6.8,ND,NA,NA,NA,875,1902.023,161.8743,3,391.5,47,ND,NA,A minimum of 85 percent areal coverage and 70 percent density should beachieved after the second year.,N,Y,"Neither the specific site, nor all the sites combined met areal converage required. On average over all 4 sites, it was 84% covereage (rather than 85% to meet criteria)",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
AguaHedionda_1999,AguaHedionda_1999_MidLag,AguaHedionda_1999_MiddleLag_6mo,Grey literature,Merkel,Agua Hedionda Lagoon,Agua Hedionda Lagoon Eelgrass Mitigation Project,33.14,-117.32,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Biodegradable Soft Anchors'- 'a cotton line collar and a pliable paper anchor which is planted parallel to the sediment surface (~10am below the surface) the anchor is made from paper sticks... like those used by candy manufacturers to create cand such as lollipops'. Calling this ""popsicle stick"" as it is very similar. ",NA,Y,"Two donor beds, no more than 10-20% of the eelgrass in donor beds were harvested",445.1542,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,2001,July-August,Summer,5,"Months 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",6,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,3237.6,ND,10,ND,ND,ND,NA,SCEMP criteria,NA,ND,"No space to meet the 1.2:1 ratio in the SCEMP in the middle lagoon so they added some area to the inner lagoon. Overall, they say the project meets areal success/coverage criteria, but they are counting 'an additional 14.53 acres of natural recruitment within the dredeged sand bar...""
Planting density: 8-12 turions per unit, with units placed on 1 m centers. (so, mean of 10 shoots on 1 m centers = 10shoots/m2)",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
AguaHedionda_1999,AguaHedionda_1999_MidLag,AguaHedionda_1999_MiddleLag_12mo,Grey literature,Merkel,Agua Hedionda Lagoon,Agua Hedionda Lagoon Eelgrass Mitigation Project,33.14,-117.32,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Biodegradable Soft Anchors'- 'a cotton line collar and a pliable paper anchor which is planted parallel to the sediment surface (~10am below the surface) the anchor is made from paper sticks... like those used by candy manufacturers to create cand such as lollipops'. Calling this ""popsicle stick"" as it is very similar. ",NA,Y,"Two donor beds, no more than 10-20% of the eelgrass in donor beds were harvested",445.1542,ND,ND,ND,299.2,ND,NA,NA,NA,2001,July-August,Summer,5,"Months 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",12,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,3237.6,ND,10,ND,ND,ND,NA,SCEMP criteria,NA,ND,"No space to meet the 1.2:1 ratio in the SCEMP in the middle lagoon so they added some area to the inner lagoon. Overall, they say the project meets areal success/coverage criteria, but they are counting 'an additional 14.53 acres of natural recruitment within the dredeged sand bar...""",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
AguaHedionda_1999,AguaHedionda_1999_MidLag,AguaHedionda_1999_MiddleLag_24mo,Grey literature,Merkel,Agua Hedionda Lagoon,Agua Hedionda Lagoon Eelgrass Mitigation Project,33.14,-117.32,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Biodegradable Soft Anchors'- 'a cotton line collar and a pliable paper anchor which is planted parallel to the sediment surface (~10am below the surface) the anchor is made from paper sticks... like those used by candy manufacturers to create cand such as lollipops'. Calling this ""popsicle stick"" as it is very similar. ",Good info on methods here: https://www.ecoatlas.org/upfiles/4408/Post%20Transplant%20Survey.PDF,Y,"Two donor beds, no more than 10-20% of the eelgrass in donor beds were harvested",445.1542,445.1542,ND,ND,318.4,ND,NA,NA,NA,2001,July-August,Summer,5,"Months 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",24,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,3237.6,ND,10,275.2,65.2,ND,NA,SCEMP criteria,Y,ND,"No space to meet the 1.2:1 ratio in the SCEMP in the middle lagoon so they added some area to the inner lagoon. Overall, they say the project meets areal success/coverage criteria, but they are counting 'an additional 14.53 acres of natural recruitment within the dredeged sand bar...""",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
AguaHedionda_1999,AguaHedionda_1999_MidLag,AguaHedionda_1999_MiddleLag_36mo,Grey literature,Merkel,Agua Hedionda Lagoon,Agua Hedionda Lagoon Eelgrass Mitigation Project,33.14,-117.32,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Biodegradable Soft Anchors'- 'a cotton line collar and a pliable paper anchor which is planted parallel to the sediment surface (~10am below the surface) the anchor is made from paper sticks... like those used by candy manufacturers to create cand such as lollipops'. Calling this ""popsicle stick"" as it is very similar. ",Good info on methods here: https://www.ecoatlas.org/upfiles/4408/Post%20Transplant%20Survey.PDF,Y,"Two donor beds, no more than 10-20% of the eelgrass in donor beds were harvested",445.1542,ND,ND,ND,322.8,54.6,NA,NA,NA,2001,July-August,Summer,5,"Months 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",36,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,3237.6,ND,10,297.6,86.8,ND,NA,SCEMP criteria,Y,ND,"No space to meet the 1.2:1 ratio in the SCEMP in the middle lagoon so they added some area to the inner lagoon. Overall, they say the project meets areal success/coverage criteria, but they are counting 'an additional 14.53 acres of natural recruitment within the dredeged sand bar...""",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
AguaHedionda_1999,AguaHedionda_1999_MidLag,AguaHedionda_1999_MiddleLag_48mo,Grey literature,Merkel,Agua Hedionda Lagoon,Agua Hedionda Lagoon Eelgrass Mitigation Project,33.14,-117.32,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Biodegradable Soft Anchors'- 'a cotton line collar and a pliable paper anchor which is planted parallel to the sediment surface (~10am below the surface) the anchor is made from paper sticks... like those used by candy manufacturers to create cand such as lollipops'. Calling this ""popsicle stick"" as it is very similar. ",Good info on methods here: https://www.ecoatlas.org/upfiles/4408/Post%20Transplant%20Survey.PDF,Y,"Two donor beds, no more than 10-20% of the eelgrass in donor beds were harvested",445.1542,ND,ND,ND,295.8,75.9,NA,NA,NA,2001,July-August,Summer,5,"Months 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",48,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,3237.6,ND,10,262.4,78.3,ND,NA,SCEMP criteria,Y,ND,"No space to meet the 1.2:1 ratio in the SCEMP in the middle lagoon so they added some area to the inner lagoon. Overall, they say the project meets areal success/coverage criteria, but they are counting 'an additional 14.53 acres of natural recruitment within the dredeged sand bar...""",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
AguaHedionda_1999,AguaHedionda_1999_MidLag,AguaHedionda_1999_MiddleLag_60mo,Grey literature,Merkel,Agua Hedionda Lagoon,Agua Hedionda Lagoon Eelgrass Mitigation Project,33.14,-117.32,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Biodegradable Soft Anchors'- 'a cotton line collar and a pliable paper anchor which is planted parallel to the sediment surface (~10am below the surface) the anchor is made from paper sticks... like those used by candy manufacturers to create cand such as lollipops'. Calling this ""popsicle stick"" as it is very similar. ",Good info on methods here: https://www.ecoatlas.org/upfiles/4408/Post%20Transplant%20Survey.PDF,Y,"Two donor beds, no more than 10-20% of the eelgrass in donor beds were harvested",445.1542,242.8114,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,2001,July-August,Summer,5,"Months 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",60,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,3237.6,ND,10,169.3,63.6,ND,NA,SCEMP criteria,Y,ND,"No space to meet the 1.2:1 ratio in the SCEMP in the middle lagoon so they added some area to the inner lagoon. Overall, they say the project meets areal success/coverage criteria, but they are counting 'an additional 14.53 acres of natural recruitment within the dredeged sand bar...""",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
AguaHedionda_1999,AguaHedionda_1999_InnerLag,AguaHedionda_1999_InnerLag_6mo,Grey literature,Merkel,Agua Hedionda Lagoon,Agua Hedionda Lagoon Eelgrass Mitigation Project,33.14,-117.32,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Biodegradable Soft Anchors'- 'a cotton line collar and a pliable paper anchor which is planted parallel to the sediment surface (~10am below the surface) the anchor is made from paper sticks... like those used by candy manufacturers to create cand such as lollipops'. Calling this ""popsicle stick"" as it is very similar. ",Good info on methods here: https://www.ecoatlas.org/upfiles/4408/Post%20Transplant%20Survey.PDF,Y,"Two donor beds, no more than 10-20% of the eelgrass in donor beds were harvested",364.217,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,2001,July-August,Summer,5,"Months 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",6,1.21,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,57467.4,46702.38,10,164.6,ND,81,NA,SCEMP criteria,NA,ND,"Overall, they say the project meets areal success/coverage criteria, but they are counting 'an additional 14.53 acres of natural recruitment within the dredeged sand bar...""",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
AguaHedionda_1999,AguaHedionda_1999_InnerLag,AguaHedionda_1999_InnerLag_12mo,Grey literature,Merkel,Agua Hedionda Lagoon,Agua Hedionda Lagoon Eelgrass Mitigation Project,33.14,-117.32,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Biodegradable Soft Anchors'- 'a cotton line collar and a pliable paper anchor which is planted parallel to the sediment surface (~10am below the surface) the anchor is made from paper sticks... like those used by candy manufacturers to create cand such as lollipops'. Calling this ""popsicle stick"" as it is very similar. ",Good info on methods here: https://www.ecoatlas.org/upfiles/4408/Post%20Transplant%20Survey.PDF,Y,"Two donor beds, no more than 10-20% of the eelgrass in donor beds were harvested",364.217,728.46,ND,ND,299.2,ND,NA,NA,NA,2001,July-August,Summer,5,"Months 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",12,1.21,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,57467.4,28490.88,10,142.6,ND,50,NA,SCEMP criteria,Y,ND,"Overall, they say the project meets areal success/coverage criteria, but they are counting 'an additional 14.53 acres of natural recruitment within the dredeged sand bar...""",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
AguaHedionda_1999,AguaHedionda_1999_InnerLag,AguaHedionda_1999_InnerLag_24mo,Grey literature,Merkel,Agua Hedionda Lagoon,Agua Hedionda Lagoon Eelgrass Mitigation Project,33.14,-117.32,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Biodegradable Soft Anchors'- 'a cotton line collar and a pliable paper anchor which is planted parallel to the sediment surface (~10am below the surface) the anchor is made from paper sticks... like those used by candy manufacturers to create cand such as lollipops'. Calling this ""popsicle stick"" as it is very similar. ",Good info on methods here: https://www.ecoatlas.org/upfiles/4408/Post%20Transplant%20Survey.PDF,Y,"Two donor beds, no more than 10-20% of the eelgrass in donor beds were harvested",364.217,971.28,ND,ND,318.4,ND,NA,NA,NA,2001,July-August,Summer,5,"Months 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",24,1.21,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,57467.4,39903.42,10,269.7,ND,69,NA,SCEMP criteria,Y,ND,"Overall, they say the project meets areal success/coverage criteria, but they are counting 'an additional 14.53 acres of natural recruitment within the dredeged sand bar...""",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
AguaHedionda_1999,AguaHedionda_1999_InnerLag,AguaHedionda_1999_InnerLag_36mo,Grey literature,Merkel,Agua Hedionda Lagoon,Agua Hedionda Lagoon Eelgrass Mitigation Project,33.14,-117.32,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Biodegradable Soft Anchors'- 'a cotton line collar and a pliable paper anchor which is planted parallel to the sediment surface (~10am below the surface) the anchor is made from paper sticks... like those used by candy manufacturers to create cand such as lollipops'. Calling this ""popsicle stick"" as it is very similar. ",Good info on methods here: https://www.ecoatlas.org/upfiles/4408/Post%20Transplant%20Survey.PDF,Y,"Two donor beds, no more than 10-20% of the eelgrass in donor beds were harvested",364.217,1295.04,ND,ND,322.8,54.6,NA,NA,NA,2001,July-August,Summer,5,"Months 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",36,1.21,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,57467.4,37070.52,10,308.1,82.5,65,NA,SCEMP criteria,Y,ND,"Overall, they say the project meets areal success/coverage criteria, but they are counting 'an additional 14.53 acres of natural recruitment within the dredeged sand bar...""",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
AguaHedionda_1999,AguaHedionda_1999_InnerLag,AguaHedionda_1999_InnerLag_48mo,Grey literature,Merkel,Agua Hedionda Lagoon,Agua Hedionda Lagoon Eelgrass Mitigation Project,33.14,-117.32,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Biodegradable Soft Anchors'- 'a cotton line collar and a pliable paper anchor which is planted parallel to the sediment surface (~10am below the surface) the anchor is made from paper sticks... like those used by candy manufacturers to create cand such as lollipops'. Calling this ""popsicle stick"" as it is very similar. ",Good info on methods here: https://www.ecoatlas.org/upfiles/4408/Post%20Transplant%20Survey.PDF,Y,"Two donor beds, no more than 10-20% of the eelgrass in donor beds were harvested",364.217,1173.63,ND,ND,294.7,68.1,NA,NA,NA,2001,July-August,Summer,5,"Months 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",48,1.21,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,57467.4,36180.18,10,278.2,95.3,63,NA,SCEMP criteria,Y,ND,"Overall, they say the project meets areal success/coverage criteria, but they are counting 'an additional 14.53 acres of natural recruitment within the dredeged sand bar...""",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
AguaHedionda_1999,AguaHedionda_1999_InnerLag,AguaHedionda_1999_InnerLag_60mo,Grey literature,Merkel,Agua Hedionda Lagoon,Agua Hedionda Lagoon Eelgrass Mitigation Project,33.14,-117.32,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Biodegradable Soft Anchors'- 'a cotton line collar and a pliable paper anchor which is planted parallel to the sediment surface (~10am below the surface) the anchor is made from paper sticks... like those used by candy manufacturers to create cand such as lollipops'. Calling this ""popsicle stick"" as it is very similar. ",Good info on methods here: https://www.ecoatlas.org/upfiles/4408/Post%20Transplant%20Survey.PDF,Y,"Two donor beds, no more than 10-20% of the eelgrass in donor beds were harvested",364.217,1173.588,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,2001,July-August,Summer,5,"Months 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60",60,1.21,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,57467.4,37919.04,10,210.4,89.1,ND,NA,SCEMP criteria,Y,ND,"Overall, they say the project meets areal success/coverage criteria, but they are counting 'an additional 14.53 acres of natural recruitment within the dredeged sand bar...""",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBC_NBBEelgrassMitigation,MBC_NBBEelgrassMitigation_plot1,MBC_NBBEelgrassMitigation_plot1_6mo,Grey literature,MBC Appplied Environmental Services,Newport Bay,Newport Beach Harbor Patrol Eelgrass Mitigation Project,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,Method not specified,"""This area was chosen based on its proximity to the transplant site, similarity of depths, temperature, and sediment regime, and relatively similar exposure to currents""",Y,ND,ND,ND,206.7,ND - could easily calculate,183.2,ND - could easily calculate,64,70,"They do not report error in reference meadow, so hard to say how significant these increases or decreases really were ",2011,July,Summer,5,"Months 0,3,6,12,24,36,48,60",6,8.267,0 to -2.5 MLLW,0 to -2.5 MLLW,ND,ND,ND,243,219,12.5,206.4,ND - could calcualte from pg 21 table,ND,ND,"A minimum of 70% areal coverage and 30% density after Year 1.¥ A minimum of 85% areal coverage and 70% density after Year 2.¥ A sustained 100% areal coverage and 85% density for the third, fourth, and fifth years (SCEMP)",Y,Y,Site the decreases in coverage due to a loss in deeper ares- benthos covered in algae in these zones. ,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,Y,"Many- see pg. 6 table 3, or in 60 month report Table 2 pg 6",Y,"Spiny Lobster, Halibut",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBC_NBBEelgrassMitigation,MBC_NBBEelgrassMitigation_plot1,MBC_NBBEelgrassMitigation_plot1_12mo,Grey literature,MBC Appplied Environmental Services,Newport Bay,Newport Beach Harbor Patrol Eelgrass Mitigation Project,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,Method not specified,"""This area was chosen based on its proximity to the transplant site, similarity of depths, temperature, and sediment regime, and relatively similar exposure to currents""",Y,ND,ND,ND,206.7,ND - could easily calculate,284.8,ND - could easily calculate,64,75,"They do not report error in reference meadow, so hard to say how significant these increases or decreases really were ",2011,July,Summer,5,"Months 0,3,6,12,24,36,48,60",12,8.267,0 to -2.5 MLLW,0 to -2.5 MLLW,ND,ND,ND,243,263,12.5,295.2,ND - could calcualte from pg 21 table,ND,ND,"A minimum of 70% areal coverage and 30% density after Year 1.¥ A minimum of 85% areal coverage and 70% density after Year 2.¥ A sustained 100% areal coverage and 85% density for the third, fourth, and fifth years (SCEMP)",Y,Y,Site the decreases in coverage due to a loss in deeper ares- benthos covered in algae in these zones. ,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,Y,"Many- see pg. 6 table 3, or in 60 month report Table 2 pg 6",Y,"Spiny Lobster, Halibut",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBC_NBBEelgrassMitigation,MBC_NBBEelgrassMitigation_plot1,MBC_NBBEelgrassMitigation_plot1_24mo,Grey literature,MBC Appplied Environmental Services,Newport Bay,Newport Beach Harbor Patrol Eelgrass Mitigation Project,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,Method not specified,"""This area was chosen based on its proximity to the transplant site, similarity of depths, temperature, and sediment regime, and relatively similar exposure to currents""",Y,ND,ND,ND,206.7,ND - could easily calculate,351.6,ND - could easily calculate,64,77,"They do not report error in reference meadow, so hard to say how significant these increases or decreases really were ",2011,July,Summer,5,"Months 0,3,6,12,24,36,48,60",24,8.267,0 to -2.5 MLLW,0 to -2.5 MLLW,ND,ND,ND,243,327,12.5,368.6,ND - could calcualte from pg 21 table,ND,ND,"A minimum of 70% areal coverage and 30% density after Year 1.¥ A minimum of 85% areal coverage and 70% density after Year 2.¥ A sustained 100% areal coverage and 85% density for the third, fourth, and fifth years (SCEMP)",Y,Y,Site the decreases in coverage due to a loss in deeper ares- benthos covered in algae in these zones. ,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,Y,"Many- see pg. 6 table 3, or in 60 month report Table 2 pg 6",Y,"Spiny Lobster, Halibut",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBC_NBBEelgrassMitigation,MBC_NBBEelgrassMitigation_plot1,MBC_NBBEelgrassMitigation_plot136mo,Grey literature,MBC Appplied Environmental Services,Newport Bay,Newport Beach Harbor Patrol Eelgrass Mitigation Project,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,Method not specified,"""This area was chosen based on its proximity to the transplant site, similarity of depths, temperature, and sediment regime, and relatively similar exposure to currents""",Y,ND,ND,ND,206.7,ND - could easily calculate,331.2,ND - could easily calculate,64,84,"They do not report error in reference meadow, so hard to say how significant these increases or decreases really were ",2011,July,Summer,5,"Months 0,3,6,12,24,36,48,60",36,8.267,0 to -2.5 MLLW,0 to -2.5 MLLW,ND,ND,ND,243,543,12.5,307.8,ND - could calcualte from pg 21 table,ND,ND,"A minimum of 70% areal coverage and 30% density after Year 1.¥ A minimum of 85% areal coverage and 70% density after Year 2.¥ A sustained 100% areal coverage and 85% density for the third, fourth, and fifth years (SCEMP)",Y,Y,Site the decreases in coverage due to a loss in deeper ares- benthos covered in algae in these zones. ,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,Y,"Many- see pg. 6 table 3, or in 60 month report Table 2 pg 6",Y,"Spiny Lobster, Halibut",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBC_NBBEelgrassMitigation,MBC_NBBEelgrassMitigation_plot1,MBC_NBBEelgrassMitigation_plot1_48mo,Grey literature,MBC Appplied Environmental Services,Newport Bay,Newport Beach Harbor Patrol Eelgrass Mitigation Project,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,Method not specified,"""This area was chosen based on its proximity to the transplant site, similarity of depths, temperature, and sediment regime, and relatively similar exposure to currents""",Y,ND,ND,ND,206.7,ND - could easily calculate,477.2,ND - could easily calculate,64,81,"They do not report error in reference meadow, so hard to say how significant these increases or decreases really were ",2011,July,Summer,5,"Months 0,3,6,12,24,36,48,60",48,8.267,0 to -2.5 MLLW,0 to -2.5 MLLW,ND,ND,ND,243,345,12.5,379.2,ND - could calcualte from pg 21 table,ND,ND,"A minimum of 70% areal coverage and 30% density after Year 1.¥ A minimum of 85% areal coverage and 70% density after Year 2.¥ A sustained 100% areal coverage and 85% density for the third, fourth, and fifth years (SCEMP)",Y,N,Site the decreases in coverage due to a loss in deeper ares- benthos covered in algae in these zones. ,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,Y,"Many- see pg. 6 table 3, or in 60 month report Table 2 pg 6",Y,"Spiny Lobster, Halibut",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBC_NBBEelgrassMitigation,MBC_NBBEelgrassMitigation_plot1,MBC_NBBEelgrassMitigation_plot1_60mo,Grey literature,MBC Appplied Environmental Services,Newport Bay,Newport Beach Harbor Patrol Eelgrass Mitigation Project,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,Method not specified,"""This area was chosen based on its proximity to the transplant site, similarity of depths, temperature, and sediment regime, and relatively similar exposure to currents""",Y,ND,ND,ND,206.7,ND - could easily calculate,486.8,ND - could easily calculate,64,86,"They do not report error in reference meadow, so hard to say how significant these increases or decreases really were ",2011,July,Summer,5,"Months 0,3,6,12,24,36,48,60",60,8.267,0 to -2.5 MLLW,0 to -2.5 MLLW,ND,ND,ND,243,396,12.5,496,ND - could calcualte from pg 21 table,ND,ND,"A minimum of 70% areal coverage and 30% density after Year 1.¥ A minimum of 85% areal coverage and 70% density after Year 2.¥ A sustained 100% areal coverage and 85% density for the third, fourth, and fifth years (SCEMP)",Y,Y,"Don't actually calculate true % veg cover, we could estimate if need be",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,Y,"Many- see pg. 6 table 3, or in 60 month report Table 2 pg 6",Y,"Spiny Lobster, Halibut",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBC_NBBEelgrassMitigation,MBC_NBBEelgrassMitigation_plot2,MBC_NBBEelgrassMitigation_plot2_6mo,Grey literature,MBC Appplied Environmental Services,Newport Bay,Newport Beach Harbor Patrol Eelgrass Mitigation Project,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,Method not specified,"""This area was chosen based on its proximity to the transplant site, similarity of depths, temperature, and sediment regime, and relatively similar exposure to currents""",Y,ND,ND,ND,206.7,ND - could easily calculate,183.2,ND - could easily calculate,64,70,"They do not report error in reference meadow, so hard to say how significant these increases or decreases really were ",2011,July,Summer,5,"Months 0,3,6,12,24,36,48,60",6,8.267,0 to -2.5 MLLW,0 to -2.5 MLLW,ND,ND,ND,67,53,12.5,214.4,ND - could calcualte from pg 21 table,ND,ND,"A minimum of 70% areal coverage and 30% density after Year 1.¥ A minimum of 85% areal coverage and 70% density after Year 2.¥ A sustained 100% areal coverage and 85% density for the third, fourth, and fifth years (SCEMP)",Y,Y,"Don't actually calculate true % veg cover, we could estimate if need be",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,Y,"Many- see pg. 6 table 3, or in 60 month report Table 2 pg 6",Y,"Spiny Lobster, Halibut",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBC_NBBEelgrassMitigation,MBC_NBBEelgrassMitigation_plot2,MBC_NBBEelgrassMitigation_plot2_12mo,Grey literature,MBC Appplied Environmental Services,Newport Bay,Newport Beach Harbor Patrol Eelgrass Mitigation Project,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,Method not specified,"""This area was chosen based on its proximity to the transplant site, similarity of depths, temperature, and sediment regime, and relatively similar exposure to currents""",Y,ND,ND,ND,206.7,ND - could easily calculate,284.8,ND - could easily calculate,64,75,"They do not report error in reference meadow, so hard to say how significant these increases or decreases really were ",2011,July,Summer,5,"Months 0,3,6,12,24,36,48,60",12,8.267,0 to -2.5 MLLW,0 to -2.5 MLLW,ND,ND,ND,67,109,12.5,294.4,ND - could calcualte from pg 21 table,ND,ND,"A minimum of 70% areal coverage and 30% density after Year 1.¥ A minimum of 85% areal coverage and 70% density after Year 2.¥ A sustained 100% areal coverage and 85% density for the third, fourth, and fifth years (SCEMP)",Y,Y,"Don't actually calculate true % veg cover, we could estimate if need be",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,Y,"Many- see pg. 6 table 3, or in 60 month report Table 2 pg 6",Y,"Spiny Lobster, Halibut",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBC_NBBEelgrassMitigation,MBC_NBBEelgrassMitigation_plot2,MBC_NBBEelgrassMitigation_plot2_24mo,Grey literature,MBC Appplied Environmental Services,Newport Bay,Newport Beach Harbor Patrol Eelgrass Mitigation Project,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,Method not specified,"""This area was chosen based on its proximity to the transplant site, similarity of depths, temperature, and sediment regime, and relatively similar exposure to currents""",Y,ND,ND,ND,206.7,ND - could easily calculate,351.6,ND - could easily calculate,64,77,"They do not report error in reference meadow, so hard to say how significant these increases or decreases really were ",2011,July,Summer,5,"Months 0,3,6,12,24,36,48,60",24,8.267,0 to -2.5 MLLW,0 to -2.5 MLLW,ND,ND,ND,67,100,12.5,298.4,ND - could calcualte from pg 21 table,ND,ND,"A minimum of 70% areal coverage and 30% density after Year 1.¥ A minimum of 85% areal coverage and 70% density after Year 2.¥ A sustained 100% areal coverage and 85% density for the third, fourth, and fifth years (SCEMP)",Y,Y,"Don't actually calculate true % veg cover, we could estimate if need be",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,Y,"Many- see pg. 6 table 3, or in 60 month report Table 2 pg 6",Y,"Spiny Lobster, Halibut",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBC_NBBEelgrassMitigation,MBC_NBBEelgrassMitigation_plot2,MBC_NBBEelgrassMitigation_plot2_36mo,Grey literature,MBC Appplied Environmental Services,Newport Bay,Newport Beach Harbor Patrol Eelgrass Mitigation Project,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,Method not specified,"""This area was chosen based on its proximity to the transplant site, similarity of depths, temperature, and sediment regime, and relatively similar exposure to currents""",Y,ND,ND,ND,206.7,ND - could easily calculate,331.2,ND - could easily calculate,64,84,"They do not report error in reference meadow, so hard to say how significant these increases or decreases really were ",2011,July,Summer,5,"Months 0,3,6,12,24,36,48,60",36,8.267,0 to -2.5 MLLW,0 to -2.5 MLLW,ND,ND,ND,67,171,12.5,300.8,ND - could calcualte from pg 21 table,ND,ND,"A minimum of 70% areal coverage and 30% density after Year 1.¥ A minimum of 85% areal coverage and 70% density after Year 2.¥ A sustained 100% areal coverage and 85% density for the third, fourth, and fifth years (SCEMP)",Y,Y,"Don't actually calculate true % veg cover, we could estimate if need be",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,Y,"Many- see pg. 6 table 3, or in 60 month report Table 2 pg 6",Y,"Spiny Lobster, Halibut",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBC_NBBEelgrassMitigation,MBC_NBBEelgrassMitigation_plot2,MBC_NBBEelgrassMitigation_plot2_48mo,Grey literature,MBC Appplied Environmental Services,Newport Bay,Newport Beach Harbor Patrol Eelgrass Mitigation Project,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,Method not specified,"""This area was chosen based on its proximity to the transplant site, similarity of depths, temperature, and sediment regime, and relatively similar exposure to currents""",Y,ND,ND,ND,206.7,ND - could easily calculate,477.2,ND - could easily calculate,64,81,"They do not report error in reference meadow, so hard to say how significant these increases or decreases really were ",2011,July,Summer,5,"Months 0,3,6,12,24,36,48,60",48,8.267,0 to -2.5 MLLW,0 to -2.5 MLLW,ND,ND,ND,67,107,12.5,250.4,ND - could calcualte from pg 21 table,ND,ND,"A minimum of 70% areal coverage and 30% density after Year 1.¥ A minimum of 85% areal coverage and 70% density after Year 2.¥ A sustained 100% areal coverage and 85% density for the third, fourth, and fifth years (SCEMP)",Y,N,"Don't actually calculate true % veg cover, we could estimate if need be",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,Y,"Many- see pg. 6 table 3, or in 60 month report Table 2 pg 6",Y,"Spiny Lobster, Halibut",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
MBC_NBBEelgrassMitigation,MBC_NBBEelgrassMitigation_plot2,MBC_NBBEelgrassMitigation_plot2_60mo,Grey literature,MBC Appplied Environmental Services,Newport Bay,Newport Beach Harbor Patrol Eelgrass Mitigation Project,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,Method not specified,"""This area was chosen based on its proximity to the transplant site, similarity of depths, temperature, and sediment regime, and relatively similar exposure to currents""",Y,ND,ND,ND,206.7,ND - could easily calculate,486.8,ND - could easily calculate,64,86,"They do not report error in reference meadow, so hard to say how significant these increases or decreases really were ",2011,July,Summer,5,"Months 0,3,6,12,24,36,48,60",60,8.267,0 to -2.5 MLLW,0 to -2.5 MLLW,ND,ND,ND,67,123,12.5,214,ND - could calcualte from pg 21 table,ND,ND,"A minimum of 70% areal coverage and 30% density after Year 1.¥ A minimum of 85% areal coverage and 70% density after Year 2.¥ A sustained 100% areal coverage and 85% density for the third, fourth, and fifth years (SCEMP)",Y,Y,"Don't actually calculate true % veg cover, we could estimate if need be",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,Y,"Many- see pg. 6 table 3, or in 60 month report Table 2 pg 6",Y,"Spiny Lobster, Halibut",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
BalboaMarina,BalboaMarina_plot1of1,BalboaMarina_plot1_12mo,Grey literature,"CRM, Inc. ",Newport Bay,Balboa Marina Eelgrass Mitigation Project,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,N,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,Method not specified,Dredging occurring for dock replacement,Y,Note that there is good reference meadow nearby that has been monitored since 2003 for reference. ,NA,NA,105.7,42,90.9,41.2,NA,NA,"Was a slight decrease in shoot density, although insignificant from pre-restoration to 2010 in reference meadow. Yr 3 report fig. 6, Table 2 pg 9 ( reported here the 2008 ref densities, since this was closer to the project date, rather than the 2004 record of ref site). ",2009,July,Summer,3,"Months 12, 24, 36",12,6.1,-2.4,-2.4 ft MLLW,ND,ND,1320 to 1584,40,40.5,36.5,59,24.2,ND,NA,"For mitigation- after 1 year, resotred plot should have 70% of the adjusted mitigation impact amount must be present, and turion density must be 30% of the pre-project area density (see CEMP sec. 10). ",Y,Y,"They established 2 5x4m plots totalling 20m2 each, with 132 bundles transplanted total. Each bundle contained 10-12 shoots. 132 bundles/40m2 = 3.3 bundles /m2. 3.3*10 and 3.3 * 12 gives range: 33 to 40 shoots per m2. Reporting median here of 36.5. See report yr. 3 pg 15 for all data. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,Y,"See appendix 4- anemones, octopus, sea hares, clams, snails, hippolyte, gammarids, round rays, topsmelt, barred snad bass, black surf perch",Observations of species in the restored meadow,"qualitative only (no values, just species list)",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
BalboaMarina,BalboaMarina_plot1of1,BalboaMarina_plot1_24mo,Grey literature,"CRM, Inc. ",Newport Bay,Balboa Marina Eelgrass Mitigation Project,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,N,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,Method not specified,Dredging occurring for dock replacement,Y,Note that there is good reference meadow nearby that has been monitored since 2003 for reference. ,NA,NA,105.7,42,128.6,39.9,NA,NA,"Was a slight decrease in shoot density, although insignificant from pre-restoration to 2010 in reference meadow. Yr 3 report fig. 6, Table 2 pg 9 ( reported here the 2008 ref densities, since this was closer to the project date, rather than the 2004 record of ref site). ",2009,July,Summer,3,"Months 12, 24, 36",24,6.1,-2.4,-2.4 ft MLLW,ND,ND,1320 to 1584,40,81.8,36.5,134.4,40.9,ND,NA,CEMP guidelines,Y,Y,"They established 2 5x4m plots totalling 20m2 each, with 132 bundles transplanted total. Each bundle contained 10-12 shoots. 132 bundles/40m2 = 3.3 bundles /m2. 3.3*10 and 3.3 * 12 gives range: 33 to 40 shoots per m2. Reporting median here of 36.5. See report yr. 3 pg 15 for all data. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,Y,"See appendix 4- anemones, octopus, sea hares, clams, snails, hippolyte, gammarids, round rays, topsmelt, barred snad bass, black surf perch",Observations of species in the restored meadow,"qualitative only (no values, just species list)",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
BalboaMarina,BalboaMarina_plot1of1,BalboaMarina_plot1_36mo,Grey literature,"CRM, Inc. ",Newport Bay,Balboa Marina Eelgrass Mitigation Project,33.61,-117.9,S. Cal,N,N,Mitigation,Active,N,None Reported,Method not specified,Dredging occurring for dock replacement,Y,Note that there is good reference meadow nearby that has been monitored since 2003 for reference. ,NA,NA,105.7,42,136.7,37,NA,NA,"Was a slight decrease in shoot density, although insignificant from pre-restoration to 2010 in reference meadow. Yr 3 report fig. 6, Table 2 pg 9 ( reported here the 2008 ref densities, since this was closer to the project date, rather than the 2004 record of ref site). ",2009,July,Summer,3,"Months 12, 24, 36",36,6.1,-2.4,-2.4 ft MLLW,ND,ND,1320 to 1584,40,97.2,36.5,168.2,61.2,ND,NA,"For mitigation- after 3 years, resotred plot should have has 6.8m2 of the adjusted mitigation impact amount must be present, and turion density must be 85% of the prioject area density (see CEMP sec. 10)",Y,Y,"They established 2 5x4m plots totalling 20m2 each, with 132 bundles transplanted total. Each bundle contained 10-12 shoots. 132 bundles/40m2 = 3.3 bundles /m2. 3.3*10 and 3.3 * 12 gives range: 33 to 40 shoots per m2. Reporting median here of 36.5. See report yr. 3 pg 15 for all data. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,Y,"See appendix 4- anemones, octopus, sea hares, clams, snails, hippolyte, gammarids, round rays, topsmelt, barred snad bass, black surf perch",Observations of species in the restored meadow,"qualitative only (no values, just species list)",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
AnaCapaIsland,AnaCapaIsland_plot1of3,AnaCapaIsland_plot1of3_Y1,Peer-review,"Santa Barbara Channel Keeper, Channel Islands Research Program, NOAA Fisheries Community-based Restoration Program","Anacapa Island, Channel Islands","Anacapa Island, Channel Islands",34,-119.39,S. Cal,"White urchins (not invasive, just superabundant)",N,Non-mitigation,Active,ND,Garden Staple,"used an adaptation of a planting technique developed by Orth et al. (1999). To prepare the sediment for the rhizome, divers used a knife or other objects to dig a small trench, about 3 to 5 cm deep. Once this sediment was loosened by the knife, a shoot was pushed into the trench so that the root hairs and rhizome were in the loose sediment and the shoot was erect. A metal anchor made of a piece of bailing wire bent into a ÒvÓ was pushed in over each rhizome to hold the plant down. Harvested from shall edge, middle, and deep edge of natural meadows to maximize genetic diversity, each shoot had a rhizome of at least 4 inches, did not discriminate between flowering vs vegetative shoots. Considered this functionally the same as a garden staple method (metal, v-shaped, inserted into sediment, shoot threaded through) so called it garden staple ",Natural meadows were gone by 1991 following 1983 El Nino that decimated eelgrass in the region via urchin recruitment boom ,Y,"Smugglers Cove and Prisoners Harbor near Santa Cruz Island, robust beds with frequent disturbances",ND,ND,56,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Shoot densities for the donor bed (Smugglers Cove) was the only one (of the two donor beds) reported and it was 36-72 shoots/m2, took the average of the two values and got 56, that's the value there and it's reported for the late 1990s and not again, so used as initial not final since final is not available. They do report other bed shoot densities but they are not donor beds (i.e. Scorpions Anchorage(?) is 169 shoots/m2). Brittlestars and urchin grazing=negative effect on reference site, no brittlestars were present at the other Channel Islands eelgrass beds; no natural recovery was observed from 1991-2002",2002,July,Summer,1,Every 1-2 months for 16 months,15,NA,23,7m,ND,ND,100,300,ND,11,10.5,ND,ND,NA,"Restoration of historical bed at Frenchy's Cove, bed expanded post-restoration with comparable shoot densities to donor site",Y,Y,"Monitored from 2002-2012 but paper reports for shallow transect the meadow area (expanded) of 2011 which is Year 9 not 10. 95-97% plot mortality by December 2002, plots sprouted back up by october 2003, also, shoot density is reported as 10.5, in the paper they write 9-12 shoots/m2 with no SD reported so I just took the average",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Y,Y,"brittlestars, wavy-top snails, purple and white urchins",Y,"Conducted fish surveys on SCUBA, reported fish abundance and urchin densities, they have a long (1991-2012) time series of this fish survey data and compare to sandy habitat",N,N,N,N,N
AnaCapaIsland,AnaCapaIsland_plot1of3,AnaCapaIsland_plot1of3_Y7,Peer-review,"Santa Barbara Channel Keeper, Channel Islands Research Program, NOAA Fisheries Community-based Restoration Program","Anacapa Island, Channel Islands","Anacapa Island, Channel Islands",34,-119.39,S. Cal,"White urchins (not invasive, just superabundant)",N,Non-mitigation,Active,ND,Garden Staple,"used an adaptation of a planting technique developed by Orth et al. (1999). To prepare the sediment for the rhizome, divers used a knife or other objects to dig a small trench, about 3 to 5 cm deep. Once this sediment was loosened by the knife, a shoot was pushed into the trench so that the root hairs and rhizome were in the loose sediment and the shoot was erect. A metal anchor made of a piece of bailing wire bent into a ÒvÓ was pushed in over each rhizome to hold the plant down. Harvested from shall edge, middle, and deep edge of natural meadows to maximize genetic diversity, each shoot had a rhizome of at least 4 inches, did not discriminate between flowering vs vegetative shoots. Considered this functionally the same as a garden staple method (metal, v-shaped, inserted into sediment, shoot threaded through) so called it garden staple ",Natural meadows were gone by 1991 following 1983 El Nino that decimated eelgrass in the region via urchin recruitment boom ,Y,"Smugglers Cove and Prisoners Harbor near Santa Cruz Island, robust beds with frequent disturbances",ND,ND,56,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Shoot densities for the donor bed (Smugglers Cove) was the only one (of the two donor beds) reported and it was 36-72 shoots/m2, took the average of the two values and got 56, that's the value there and it's reported for the late 1990s and not again, so used as initial not final since final is not available. They do report other bed shoot densities but they are not donor beds (i.e. Scorpions Anchorage(?) is 169 shoots/m2). Brittlestars and urchin grazing=negative effect on reference site, no brittlestars were present at the other Channel Islands eelgrass beds; no natural recovery was observed from 1991-2003",2002,July,Summer,1,Every 1-2 months for 16 months,84,NA,23,7m,ND,ND,100,300,20,11,108,ND,ND,NA,"Restoration of historical bed at Frenchy's Cove, bed expanded post-restoration with comparable shoot densities to donor site",Y,Y,"Reported is the meadow area in 2005 which is before Year 7 but the other data (shoot density, for example) is reported for Y7, not 4 so this is the data available between Y4 and Y7. 95-97% plot mortality by December 2002, plots sprouted back up by october 2003, also, shoot density for shallow transect in Oct 2003 is recorded here as 10.5, in the paper they write 9-12 shoots/m2 with no SD reported so I just took the average",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Y,Y,"brittlestars, wavy-top snails, purple and white urchins",Y,"Conducted fish surveys on SCUBA, reported fish abundance and urchin densities, they have a long (1991-2012) time series of this fish survey data and compare to sandy habitat",N,N,N,N,N
AnaCapaIsland,AnaCapaIsland_plot1of3,AnaCapaIsland_plot1of3_Y10,Peer-review,"Santa Barbara Channel Keeper, Channel Islands Research Program, NOAA Fisheries Community-based Restoration Program","Anacapa Island, Channel Islands","Anacapa Island, Channel Islands",34,-119.39,S. Cal,"White urchins (not invasive, just superabundant)",N,Non-mitigation,Active,ND,Garden Staple,"used an adaptation of a planting technique developed by Orth et al. (1999). To prepare the sediment for the rhizome, divers used a knife or other objects to dig a small trench, about 3 to 5 cm deep. Once this sediment was loosened by the knife, a shoot was pushed into the trench so that the root hairs and rhizome were in the loose sediment and the shoot was erect. A metal anchor made of a piece of bailing wire bent into a ÒvÓ was pushed in over each rhizome to hold the plant down. Harvested from shall edge, middle, and deep edge of natural meadows to maximize genetic diversity, each shoot had a rhizome of at least 4 inches, did not discriminate between flowering vs vegetative shoots. Considered this functionally the same as a garden staple method (metal, v-shaped, inserted into sediment, shoot threaded through) so called it garden staple ",Natural meadows were gone by 1991 following 1983 El Nino that decimated eelgrass in the region via urchin recruitment boom ,Y,"Smugglers Cove and Prisoners Harbor near Santa Cruz Island, robust beds with frequent disturbances",ND,ND,56,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Shoot densities for the donor bed (Smugglers Cove) was the only one (of the two donor beds) reported and it was 36-72 shoots/m2, took the average of the two values and got 56, that's the value there and it's reported for the late 1990s and not again, so used as initial not final since final is not available. They do report other bed shoot densities but they are not donor beds (i.e. Scorpions Anchorage(?) is 169 shoots/m2). Brittlestars and urchin grazing=negative effect on reference site, no brittlestars were present at the other Channel Islands eelgrass beds; no natural recovery was observed from 1991-2004",2002,July,Summer,1,Every 1-2 months for 16 months,120,NA,23,7m,ND,ND,100,300,428,11,56.5,ND,ND,NA,"Restoration of historical bed at Frenchy's Cove, bed expanded post-restoration with comparable shoot densities to donor site",Y,Y,Monitored from 2002-2012 but paper reports for shallow transect the meadow area (expanded) of 2011 which is Year 9 not 10. 95-97% plot mortality by December 2002. Reported shoot density at Year 10 is 23-90/m2 so did the math and got 56.5,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,Y,Y,"black perch, pile perch",Y,"Conducted fish surveys on SCUBA, reported fish abundance and urchin densities, they have a long (1991-2012) time series of this fish survey data and compare to sandy habitat",N,N,N,N,N
AnaCapaIsland,AnaCapaIsland_plot2of3,AnaCapaIsland_plot2of3_Y1,Peer-review,"Santa Barbara Channel Keeper, Channel Islands Research Program, NOAA Fisheries Community-based Restoration Program","Anacapa Island, Channel Islands","Anacapa Island, Channel Islands",34,-119.39,S. Cal,"White urchins (not invasive, just superabundant)",N,Non-mitigation,Active,ND,Garden Staple,"used an adaptation of a planting technique developed by Orth et al. (1999). To prepare the sediment for the rhizome, divers used a knife or other objects to dig a small trench, about 3 to 5 cm deep. Once this sediment was loosened by the knife, a shoot was pushed into the trench so that the root hairs and rhizome were in the loose sediment and the shoot was erect. A metal anchor made of a piece of bailing wire bent into a ÒvÓ was pushed in over each rhizome to hold the plant down. Harvested from shall edge, middle, and deep edge of natural meadows to maximize genetic diversity, each shoot had a rhizome of at least 4 inches, did not discriminate between flowering vs vegetative shoots. Considered this functionally the same as a garden staple method (metal, v-shaped, inserted into sediment, shoot threaded through) so called it garden staple ",Natural meadows were gone by 1991 following 1983 El Nino that decimated eelgrass in the region via urchin recruitment boom ,Y,"Smugglers Cove and Prisoners Harbor near Santa Cruz Island, robust beds with frequent disturbances",ND,ND,56,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Shoot densities for the donor bed (Smugglers Cove) was the only one (of the two donor beds) reported and it was 36-72 shoots/m2, took the average of the two values and got 56, that's the value there and it's reported for the late 1990s and not again, so used as initial not final since final is not available. They do report other bed shoot densities but they are not donor beds (i.e. Scorpions Anchorage(?) is 169 shoots/m2). Brittlestars and urchin grazing=negative effect on reference site, no brittlestars were present at the other Channel Islands eelgrass beds; no natural recovery was observed from 1991-2005",2002,July,Summer,1,Every 1-2 months for 16 months,15,NA,30,10m,ND,ND,100,300,ND,11,25,ND,ND,NA,"Restoration of historical bed at Frenchy's Cove, bed expanded post-restoration with comparable shoot densities to donor site",Y,Y,"95-97% plot mortality by December 2002, plots sprouted back up by october 2003, also, shoot density is reported as 10.5, in the paper they write 9-12 shoots/m2 with no SD reported so I just took the average",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,N,N,N,N,N
AnaCapaIsland,AnaCapaIsland_plot2of3,AnaCapaIsland_plot2of3_Y7,Peer-review,"Santa Barbara Channel Keeper, Channel Islands Research Program, NOAA Fisheries Community-based Restoration Program","Anacapa Island, Channel Islands","Anacapa Island, Channel Islands",34,-119.39,S. Cal,"White urchins (not invasive, just superabundant)",N,Non-mitigation,Active,ND,Garden Staple,"used an adaptation of a planting technique developed by Orth et al. (1999). To prepare the sediment for the rhizome, divers used a knife or other objects to dig a small trench, about 3 to 5 cm deep. Once this sediment was loosened by the knife, a shoot was pushed into the trench so that the root hairs and rhizome were in the loose sediment and the shoot was erect. A metal anchor made of a piece of bailing wire bent into a ÒvÓ was pushed in over each rhizome to hold the plant down. Harvested from shall edge, middle, and deep edge of natural meadows to maximize genetic diversity, each shoot had a rhizome of at least 4 inches, did not discriminate between flowering vs vegetative shoots. Considered this functionally the same as a garden staple method (metal, v-shaped, inserted into sediment, shoot threaded through) so called it garden staple ",Natural meadows were gone by 1991 following 1983 El Nino that decimated eelgrass in the region via urchin recruitment boom ,Y,"Smugglers Cove and Prisoners Harbor near Santa Cruz Island, robust beds with frequent disturbances",ND,ND,56,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Shoot densities for the donor bed (Smugglers Cove) was the only one (of the two donor beds) reported and it was 36-72 shoots/m2, took the average of the two values and got 56, that's the value there and it's reported for the late 1990s and not again, so used as initial not final since final is not available. They do report other bed shoot densities but they are not donor beds (i.e. Scorpions Anchorage(?) is 169 shoots/m2). Brittlestars and urchin grazing=negative effect on reference site, no brittlestars were present at the other Channel Islands eelgrass beds; no natural recovery was observed from 1991-2006",2002,July,Summer,1,Every 1-2 months for 16 months,84,NA,30,10m,ND,ND,100,300,ND,11,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Restoration of historical bed at Frenchy's Cove, bed expanded post-restoration with comparable shoot densities to donor site",Y,Y,"95-97% plot mortality by December 2002, plots sprouted back up by october 2003, also, shoot density is reported as 10.5, in the paper they write 9-12 shoots/m2 with no SD reported so I just took the average",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,N,N,N,N,N
AnaCapaIsland,AnaCapaIsland_plot2of3,AnaCapaIsland_plot2of3_Y10,Peer-review,"Santa Barbara Channel Keeper, Channel Islands Research Program, NOAA Fisheries Community-based Restoration Program","Anacapa Island, Channel Islands","Anacapa Island, Channel Islands",34,-119.39,S. Cal,"White urchins (not invasive, just superabundant)",N,Non-mitigation,Active,ND,Garden Staple,"used an adaptation of a planting technique developed by Orth et al. (1999). To prepare the sediment for the rhizome, divers used a knife or other objects to dig a small trench, about 3 to 5 cm deep. Once this sediment was loosened by the knife, a shoot was pushed into the trench so that the root hairs and rhizome were in the loose sediment and the shoot was erect. A metal anchor made of a piece of bailing wire bent into a ÒvÓ was pushed in over each rhizome to hold the plant down. Harvested from shall edge, middle, and deep edge of natural meadows to maximize genetic diversity, each shoot had a rhizome of at least 4 inches, did not discriminate between flowering vs vegetative shoots. Considered this functionally the same as a garden staple method (metal, v-shaped, inserted into sediment, shoot threaded through) so called it garden staple ",Natural meadows were gone by 1991 following 1983 El Nino that decimated eelgrass in the region via urchin recruitment boom ,Y,"Smugglers Cove and Prisoners Harbor near Santa Cruz Island, robust beds with frequent disturbances",ND,ND,56,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Shoot densities for the donor bed (Smugglers Cove) was the only one (of the two donor beds) reported and it was 36-72 shoots/m2, took the average of the two values and got 56, that's the value there and it's reported for the late 1990s and not again, so used as initial not final since final is not available. They do report other bed shoot densities but they are not donor beds (i.e. Scorpions Anchorage(?) is 169 shoots/m2). Brittlestars and urchin grazing=negative effect on reference site, no brittlestars were present at the other Channel Islands eelgrass beds; no natural recovery was observed from 1991-2007",2002,July,Summer,1,Every 1-2 months for 16 months,120,NA,30,10m,ND,ND,100,300,ND,11,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Restoration of historical bed at Frenchy's Cove, bed expanded post-restoration with comparable shoot densities to donor site",Y,Y,"95-97% plot mortality by December 2002, plots sprouted back up by october 2003, also, shoot density is reported as 10.5, in the paper they write 9-12 shoots/m2 with no SD reported so I just took the average",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,N,N,N,N,N
AnaCapaIsland,AnaCapaIsland_plot3of3,AnaCapaIsland_plot3of3_Y1,Peer-review,"Santa Barbara Channel Keeper, Channel Islands Research Program, NOAA Fisheries Community-based Restoration Program","Anacapa Island, Channel Islands","Anacapa Island, Channel Islands",34,-119.39,S. Cal,"White urchins (not invasive, just superabundant)",N,Non-mitigation,Active,ND,Garden Staple,"used an adaptation of a planting technique developed by Orth et al. (1999). To prepare the sediment for the rhizome, divers used a knife or other objects to dig a small trench, about 3 to 5 cm deep. Once this sediment was loosened by the knife, a shoot was pushed into the trench so that the root hairs and rhizome were in the loose sediment and the shoot was erect. A metal anchor made of a piece of bailing wire bent into a ÒvÓ was pushed in over each rhizome to hold the plant down. Harvested from shall edge, middle, and deep edge of natural meadows to maximize genetic diversity, each shoot had a rhizome of at least 4 inches, did not discriminate between flowering vs vegetative shoots. Considered this functionally the same as a garden staple method (metal, v-shaped, inserted into sediment, shoot threaded through) so called it garden staple ",Natural meadows were gone by 1991 following 1983 El Nino that decimated eelgrass in the region via urchin recruitment boom ,Y,"Smugglers Cove and Prisoners Harbor near Santa Cruz Island, robust beds with frequent disturbances",ND,ND,56,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Shoot densities for the donor bed (Smugglers Cove) was the only one (of the two donor beds) reported and it was 36-72 shoots/m2, took the average of the two values and got 56, that's the value there and it's reported for the late 1990s and not again, so used as initial not final since final is not available. They do report other bed shoot densities but they are not donor beds (i.e. Scorpions Anchorage(?) is 169 shoots/m2). Brittlestars and urchin grazing=negative effect on reference site, no brittlestars were present at the other Channel Islands eelgrass beds; no natural recovery was observed from 1991-2008",2002,July,Summer,1,Every 1-2 months for 16 months,15,NA,ND,6-13m,ND,ND,250,300,ND,1.1,0,0,ND,NA,"Restoration of historical bed at Frenchy's Cove, bed expanded post-restoration with comparable shoot densities to donor site",Y,Y,"Cite low density of transplants for genetic study for why plots disappeared first. 95-97% plot mortality by December 2002, plots sprouted back up by october 2003, also, shoot density is reported as 10.5, in the paper they write 9-12 shoots/m2 with no SD reported so I just took the average",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,N,N,N,N,N
AnaCapaIsland,AnaCapaIsland_plot3of3,AnaCapaIsland_plot3of3_Y7,Peer-review,"Santa Barbara Channel Keeper, Channel Islands Research Program, NOAA Fisheries Community-based Restoration Program","Anacapa Island, Channel Islands","Anacapa Island, Channel Islands",34,-119.39,S. Cal,"White urchins (not invasive, just superabundant)",N,Non-mitigation,Active,ND,Garden Staple,"used an adaptation of a planting technique developed by Orth et al. (1999). To prepare the sediment for the rhizome, divers used a knife or other objects to dig a small trench, about 3 to 5 cm deep. Once this sediment was loosened by the knife, a shoot was pushed into the trench so that the root hairs and rhizome were in the loose sediment and the shoot was erect. A metal anchor made of a piece of bailing wire bent into a ÒvÓ was pushed in over each rhizome to hold the plant down. Harvested from shall edge, middle, and deep edge of natural meadows to maximize genetic diversity, each shoot had a rhizome of at least 4 inches, did not discriminate between flowering vs vegetative shoots. Considered this functionally the same as a garden staple method (metal, v-shaped, inserted into sediment, shoot threaded through) so called it garden staple ",Natural meadows were gone by 1991 following 1983 El Nino that decimated eelgrass in the region via urchin recruitment boom ,Y,"Smugglers Cove and Prisoners Harbor near Santa Cruz Island, robust beds with frequent disturbances",ND,ND,56,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Shoot densities for the donor bed (Smugglers Cove) was the only one (of the two donor beds) reported and it was 36-72 shoots/m2, took the average of the two values and got 56, that's the value there and it's reported for the late 1990s and not again, so used as initial not final since final is not available. They do report other bed shoot densities but they are not donor beds (i.e. Scorpions Anchorage(?) is 169 shoots/m2). Brittlestars and urchin grazing=negative effect on reference site, no brittlestars were present at the other Channel Islands eelgrass beds; no natural recovery was observed from 1991-2009",2002,July,Summer,1,Every 1-2 months for 16 months,84,NA,ND,6-13m,ND,ND,250,300,ND,1.1,0,0,ND,NA,"Restoration of historical bed at Frenchy's Cove, bed expanded post-restoration with comparable shoot densities to donor site",Y,Y,"Cite low density of transplants for genetic study for why plots disappeared first. 95-97% plot mortality by December 2002, plots sprouted back up by october 2003, also, shoot density is reported as 10.5, in the paper they write 9-12 shoots/m2 with no SD reported so I just took the average",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,N,N,N,N,N
AnaCapaIsland,AnaCapaIsland_plot3of3,AnaCapaIsland_plot3of3_Y10,Peer-review,"Santa Barbara Channel Keeper, Channel Islands Research Program, NOAA Fisheries Community-based Restoration Program","Anacapa Island, Channel Islands","Anacapa Island, Channel Islands",34,-119.39,S. Cal,"White urchins (not invasive, just superabundant)",N,Non-mitigation,Active,ND,Garden Staple,"used an adaptation of a planting technique developed by Orth et al. (1999). To prepare the sediment for the rhizome, divers used a knife or other objects to dig a small trench, about 3 to 5 cm deep. Once this sediment was loosened by the knife, a shoot was pushed into the trench so that the root hairs and rhizome were in the loose sediment and the shoot was erect. A metal anchor made of a piece of bailing wire bent into a ÒvÓ was pushed in over each rhizome to hold the plant down. Harvested from shall edge, middle, and deep edge of natural meadows to maximize genetic diversity, each shoot had a rhizome of at least 4 inches, did not discriminate between flowering vs vegetative shoots. Considered this functionally the same as a garden staple method (metal, v-shaped, inserted into sediment, shoot threaded through) so called it garden staple ",Natural meadows were gone by 1991 following 1983 El Nino that decimated eelgrass in the region via urchin recruitment boom ,Y,"Smugglers Cove and Prisoners Harbor near Santa Cruz Island, robust beds with frequent disturbances",ND,ND,56,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Shoot densities for the donor bed (Smugglers Cove) was the only one (of the two donor beds) reported and it was 36-72 shoots/m2, took the average of the two values and got 56, that's the value there and it's reported for the late 1990s and not again, so used as initial not final since final is not available. They do report other bed shoot densities but they are not donor beds (i.e. Scorpions Anchorage(?) is 169 shoots/m2). Brittlestars and urchin grazing=negative effect on reference site, no brittlestars were present at the other Channel Islands eelgrass beds; no natural recovery was observed from 1991-2010",2002,July,Summer,1,Every 1-2 months for 16 months,120,NA,ND,6-13m,ND,ND,250,300,ND,1.1,0,0,ND,NA,"Restoration of historical bed at Frenchy's Cove, bed expanded post-restoration with comparable shoot densities to donor site",Y,Y,"Cite low density of transplants for genetic study for why plots disappeared first. 95-97% plot mortality by December 2002, plots sprouted back up by october 2003, also, shoot density is reported as 10.5, in the paper they write 9-12 shoots/m2 with no SD reported so I just took the average",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,N,N,N,N,N
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot1.1of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot1.1of6_week4,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bare root bundles made up of 8 turions each,"Testing sediment plug vs bare root; Calling ""studies"", ""plots"" for the sake of the database, and there were 8 (we consolidated into 5) studies each with different treatments/methods; Project required that 0.55 acres (0.22 hectares) be transplanted--this study is listed as STUDY 1",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,8,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m2",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",1,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,6.25,0.0031,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success of either restoration technique--which had higher cover,NA,NA,95% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot1.1of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot1.1of6_week8,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bare root bundles made up of 8 turions each,"Testing sediment plug vs bare root; Calling ""studies"", ""plots"" for the sake of the database, and there were 8 (we consolidated into 5) studies each with different treatments/methods; Project required that 0.55 acres (0.22 hectares) be transplanted--this study is listed as STUDY 1",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,8,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m3",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",2,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,6.25,0.0025,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success of either restoration technique--which had higher cover,NA,NA,95% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot1.1of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot1.1of6_week12,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bare root bundles made up of 8 turions each,"Testing sediment plug vs bare root; Calling ""studies"", ""plots"" for the sake of the database, and there were 8 (we consolidated into 5) studies each with different treatments/methods; Project required that 0.55 acres (0.22 hectares) be transplanted--this study is listed as STUDY 1",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,8.8,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m4",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",3,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,6.25,0.0052,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success of either restoration technique--which had higher cover,NA,NA,90% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot1.1of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot1.1of6_week24,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bare root bundles made up of 8 turions each,"Testing sediment plug vs bare root; Calling ""studies"", ""plots"" for the sake of the database, and there were 8 (we consolidated into 5) studies each with different treatments/methods; Project required that 0.55 acres (0.22 hectares) be transplanted--this study is listed as STUDY 1",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,10,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m5",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",6,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,6.25,0.0041,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success of either restoration technique--which had higher cover,NA,NA,86% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot1.1of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot1.1of6_week32,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bare root bundles made up of 8 turions each,"Testing sediment plug vs bare root; Calling ""studies"", ""plots"" for the sake of the database, and there were 8 (we consolidated into 5) studies each with different treatments/methods; Project required that 0.55 acres (0.22 hectares) be transplanted--this study is listed as STUDY 1",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,8.4,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m6",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",8,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,6.25,0.0028,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success of either restoration technique--which had higher cover,NA,NA,74% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot1.1of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot1.1of6_week48,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bare root bundles made up of 8 turions each,"Testing sediment plug vs bare root; Calling ""studies"", ""plots"" for the sake of the database, and there were 8 (we consolidated into 5) studies each with different treatments/methods; Project required that 0.55 acres (0.22 hectares) be transplanted--this study is listed as STUDY 1",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,4,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m7",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",12,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,6.25,0.0033,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success of either restoration technique--which had higher cover,NA,NA,30% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot1.2of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot1.2of6_week4,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Plug,6 inch wide PVC core plugs with as many shoots as were present in the plug (varied),"Testing sediment plug vs bare root; Calling ""studies"", ""plots"" for the sake of the database, and there were 8 (we consolidated into 5) studies each with different treatments/methods; Project required that 0.55 acres (0.22 hectares) be transplanted--this study is listed as STUDY 1",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,8,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m8",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",1,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,ND,6.25,0.0009,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success of either restoration technique--which had higher cover,NA,NA,67% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot1.2of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot1.2of6_week8,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Plug,6 inch wide PVC core plugs with as many shoots as were present in the plug (varied),"Testing sediment plug vs bare root; Calling ""studies"", ""plots"" for the sake of the database, and there were 8 (we consolidated into 5) studies each with different treatments/methods; Project required that 0.55 acres (0.22 hectares) be transplanted--this study is listed as STUDY 1",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,8,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m9",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",2,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,ND,6.25,0.0007,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success of either restoration technique--which had higher cover,NA,NA,63% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot1.2of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot1.2of6_week12,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Plug,6 inch wide PVC core plugs with as many shoots as were present in the plug (varied),"Testing sediment plug vs bare root; Calling ""studies"", ""plots"" for the sake of the database, and there were 8 (we consolidated into 5) studies each with different treatments/methods; Project required that 0.55 acres (0.22 hectares) be transplanted--this study is listed as STUDY 1",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,8.8,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m10",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",3,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,ND,6.25,0.0004,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success of either restoration technique--which had higher cover,NA,NA,61% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot1.2of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot1.2of6_week24,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Plug,6 inch wide PVC core plugs with as many shoots as were present in the plug (varied),"Testing sediment plug vs bare root; Calling ""studies"", ""plots"" for the sake of the database, and there were 8 (we consolidated into 5) studies each with different treatments/methods; Project required that 0.55 acres (0.22 hectares) be transplanted--this study is listed as STUDY 1",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,10,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m11",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",6,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,ND,6.25,0.0012,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success of either restoration technique--which had higher cover,NA,NA,44% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot1.2of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot1.2of6_week32,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Plug,6 inch wide PVC core plugs with as many shoots as were present in the plug (varied),"Testing sediment plug vs bare root; Calling ""studies"", ""plots"" for the sake of the database, and there were 8 (we consolidated into 5) studies each with different treatments/methods; Project required that 0.55 acres (0.22 hectares) be transplanted--this study is listed as STUDY 1",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,8.4,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m12",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",8,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,ND,6.25,0.0007,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success of either restoration technique--which had higher cover,NA,NA,35% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot1.2of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot1.2of6_week48,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Plug,6 inch wide PVC core plugs with as many shoots as were present in the plug (varied),"Testing sediment plug vs bare root; Calling ""studies"", ""plots"" for the sake of the database, and there were 8 (we consolidated into 5) studies each with different treatments/methods; Project required that 0.55 acres (0.22 hectares) be transplanted--this study is listed as STUDY 1",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,4,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m13",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",12,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,ND,6.25,0.0029,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success of either restoration technique--which had higher cover,NA,NA,14% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.1of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.1of6_week2,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bundles each with a different number of turions; see columns BD-BE,"Testing how different transplanted turion counts affects survival, growth, etc. --this study is listed as STUDY 2 and 3",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,8,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m14",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",1,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,50,6.25,0.0007,18,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success based on comparison of survival and areal expansion of different transplanted initial shoot densities,NA,NA,86% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.1of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.1of6_week8,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bundles each with a different number of turions; see columns BD-BE,"Testing how different transplanted turion counts affects survival, growth, etc. --this study is listed as STUDY 2 and 3",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,8,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m15",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",2,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,50,6.25,0.0027,18,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success based on comparison of survival and areal expansion of different transplanted initial shoot densities,NA,NA,82% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.1of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.1of6_week12,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bundles each with a different number of turions; see columns BD-BE,"Testing how different transplanted turion counts affects survival, growth, etc. --this study is listed as STUDY 2 and 3",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,8.8,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m16",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",3,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,50,6.25,0.0007,18,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success based on comparison of survival and areal expansion of different transplanted initial shoot densities,NA,NA,86% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.1of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.1of6_week24,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bundles each with a different number of turions; see columns BD-BE,"Testing how different transplanted turion counts affects survival, growth, etc. --this study is listed as STUDY 2 and 3",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,10,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m17",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",6,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,50,6.25,0.0019,18,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success based on comparison of survival and areal expansion of different transplanted initial shoot densities,NA,NA,81% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.1of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.1of6_week32,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bundles each with a different number of turions; see columns BD-BE,"Testing how different transplanted turion counts affects survival, growth, etc. --this study is listed as STUDY 2 and 3",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,8.4,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m18",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",8,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,50,6.25,0.0015,18,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success based on comparison of survival and areal expansion of different transplanted initial shoot densities,NA,NA,62% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.1of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.1of6_week48,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bundles each with a different number of turions; see columns BD-BE,"Testing how different transplanted turion counts affects survival, growth, etc. --this study is listed as STUDY 2 and 3",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,4,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m19",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",12,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,50,6.25,0,18,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success based on comparison of survival and areal expansion of different transplanted initial shoot densities,NA,NA,27% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.2of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.2of6_week2,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bundles each with a different number of turions; see columns BD-BE,"Testing how different transplanted turion counts affects survival, growth, etc. --this study is listed as STUDY 2 and 3",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,8,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m20",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",1,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,100,6.25,0.0012,36,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success based on comparison of survival and areal expansion of different transplanted initial shoot densities,NA,NA,93% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.2of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.2of6_week8,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bundles each with a different number of turions; see columns BD-BE,"Testing how different transplanted turion counts affects survival, growth, etc. --this study is listed as STUDY 2 and 3",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,8,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m21",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",2,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,100,6.25,0.0005,36,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success based on comparison of survival and areal expansion of different transplanted initial shoot densities,NA,NA,88% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.2of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.2of6_week12,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bundles each with a different number of turions; see columns BD-BE,"Testing how different transplanted turion counts affects survival, growth, etc. --this study is listed as STUDY 2 and 3",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,8.8,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m22",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",3,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,100,6.25,0.0009,36,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success based on comparison of survival and areal expansion of different transplanted initial shoot densities,NA,NA,83% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.2of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.2of6_week24,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bundles each with a different number of turions; see columns BD-BE,"Testing how different transplanted turion counts affects survival, growth, etc. --this study is listed as STUDY 2 and 3",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,10,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m23",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",6,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,100,6.25,0.001,36,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success based on comparison of survival and areal expansion of different transplanted initial shoot densities,NA,NA,81% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.2of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.2of6_week32,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bundles each with a different number of turions; see columns BD-BE,"Testing how different transplanted turion counts affects survival, growth, etc. --this study is listed as STUDY 2 and 3",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,8.4,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m24",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",8,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,100,6.25,0.0008,36,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success based on comparison of survival and areal expansion of different transplanted initial shoot densities,NA,NA,58% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.2of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.2of6_week48,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bundles each with a different number of turions; see columns BD-BE,"Testing how different transplanted turion counts affects survival, growth, etc. --this study is listed as STUDY 2 and 3",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,4,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m25",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",12,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,100,6.25,0.0006,36,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success based on comparison of survival and areal expansion of different transplanted initial shoot densities,NA,NA,21% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.3of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.3of6_week2,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bundles each with a different number of turions; see columns BD-BE,"Testing how different transplanted turion counts affects survival, growth, etc. --this study is listed as STUDY 2 and 3",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,8,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m26",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",1,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,150,6.25,0.002,54,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success based on comparison of survival and areal expansion of different transplanted initial shoot densities,NA,NA,95% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.3of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.3of6_week8,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bundles each with a different number of turions; see columns BD-BE,"Testing how different transplanted turion counts affects survival, growth, etc. --this study is listed as STUDY 2 and 3",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,8,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m27",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",2,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,150,6.25,0.0024,54,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success based on comparison of survival and areal expansion of different transplanted initial shoot densities,NA,NA,96% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.3of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.3of6_week12,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bundles each with a different number of turions; see columns BD-BE,"Testing how different transplanted turion counts affects survival, growth, etc. --this study is listed as STUDY 2 and 3",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,8.8,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m28",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",3,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,150,6.25,0.0018,54,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success based on comparison of survival and areal expansion of different transplanted initial shoot densities,NA,NA,90% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.3of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.3of6_week24,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bundles each with a different number of turions; see columns BD-BE,"Testing how different transplanted turion counts affects survival, growth, etc. --this study is listed as STUDY 2 and 3",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,10,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m29",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",6,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,150,6.25,0.0023,54,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success based on comparison of survival and areal expansion of different transplanted initial shoot densities,NA,NA,71% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.3of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.3of6_week32,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bundles each with a different number of turions; see columns BD-BE,"Testing how different transplanted turion counts affects survival, growth, etc. --this study is listed as STUDY 2 and 3",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,8.4,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m30",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",8,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,150,6.25,0.00145,54,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success based on comparison of survival and areal expansion of different transplanted initial shoot densities,NA,NA,69% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.3of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.3of6_week48,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bundles each with a different number of turions; see columns BD-BE,"Testing how different transplanted turion counts affects survival, growth, etc. --this study is listed as STUDY 2 and 3",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,4,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m31",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",12,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,150,6.25,0,54,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success based on comparison of survival and areal expansion of different transplanted initial shoot densities,NA,NA,22% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.4of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.4of6_week2,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bundles each with a different number of turions; see columns BD-BE,"Testing how different transplanted turion counts affects survival, growth, etc. --this study is listed as STUDY 2 and 3",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,8,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m32",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",1,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,6.25,0.0024,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success based on comparison of survival and areal expansion of different transplanted initial shoot densities,NA,NA,100% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.4of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.4of6_week8,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bundles each with a different number of turions; see columns BD-BE,"Testing how different transplanted turion counts affects survival, growth, etc. --this study is listed as STUDY 2 and 3",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,8,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m33",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",2,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,6.25,0.0028,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success based on comparison of survival and areal expansion of different transplanted initial shoot densities,NA,NA,100% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.4of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.4of6_week12,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bundles each with a different number of turions; see columns BD-BE,"Testing how different transplanted turion counts affects survival, growth, etc. --this study is listed as STUDY 2 and 3",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,8.8,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m34",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",3,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,6.25,0.0023,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success based on comparison of survival and areal expansion of different transplanted initial shoot densities,NA,NA,93% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.4of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.4of6_week24,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bundles each with a different number of turions; see columns BD-BE,"Testing how different transplanted turion counts affects survival, growth, etc. --this study is listed as STUDY 2 and 3",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,10,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m35",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",6,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,6.25,0.0021,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success based on comparison of survival and areal expansion of different transplanted initial shoot densities,NA,NA,84% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.4of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.4of6_week32,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bundles each with a different number of turions; see columns BD-BE,"Testing how different transplanted turion counts affects survival, growth, etc. --this study is listed as STUDY 2 and 3",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,8.4,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m36",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",8,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,6.25,0.0034,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success based on comparison of survival and areal expansion of different transplanted initial shoot densities,NA,NA,86% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.4of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.4of6_week48,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bundles each with a different number of turions; see columns BD-BE,"Testing how different transplanted turion counts affects survival, growth, etc. --this study is listed as STUDY 2 and 3",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,4,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m37",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",12,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,6.25,0.0012,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success based on comparison of survival and areal expansion of different transplanted initial shoot densities,NA,NA,30% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.5of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.5of6_week2,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bundles each with a different number of turions; see columns BD-BE,"Testing how different transplanted turion counts affects survival, growth, etc. --this study is listed as STUDY 2 and 3",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,8,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m38",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",1,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,250,6.25,0.003,90,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success based on comparison of survival and areal expansion of different transplanted initial shoot densities,NA,NA,98% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.5of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.5of6_week8,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bundles each with a different number of turions; see columns BD-BE,"Testing how different transplanted turion counts affects survival, growth, etc. --this study is listed as STUDY 2 and 3",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,8,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m39",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",2,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,250,6.25,0.0036,90,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success based on comparison of survival and areal expansion of different transplanted initial shoot densities,NA,NA,97% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.5of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.5of6_week12,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bundles each with a different number of turions; see columns BD-BE,"Testing how different transplanted turion counts affects survival, growth, etc. --this study is listed as STUDY 2 and 3",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,8.8,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m40",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",3,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,250,6.25,0.0025,90,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success based on comparison of survival and areal expansion of different transplanted initial shoot densities,NA,NA,92% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.5of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.5of6_week24,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bundles each with a different number of turions; see columns BD-BE,"Testing how different transplanted turion counts affects survival, growth, etc. --this study is listed as STUDY 2 and 3",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,10,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m41",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",6,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,250,6.25,0.0012,90,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success based on comparison of survival and areal expansion of different transplanted initial shoot densities,NA,NA,87% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.5of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.5of6_week32,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bundles each with a different number of turions; see columns BD-BE,"Testing how different transplanted turion counts affects survival, growth, etc. --this study is listed as STUDY 2 and 3",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,8.4,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m42",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",8,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,250,6.25,0.0021,90,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success based on comparison of survival and areal expansion of different transplanted initial shoot densities,NA,NA,78% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.5of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.5of6_week48,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bundles each with a different number of turions; see columns BD-BE,"Testing how different transplanted turion counts affects survival, growth, etc. --this study is listed as STUDY 2 and 3",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,4,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m43",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",12,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,250,6.25,0.001,90,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success based on comparison of survival and areal expansion of different transplanted initial shoot densities,NA,NA,34% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.6of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.6of6_week2,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bundles each with a different number of turions; see columns BD-BE,"Testing how different transplanted turion counts affects survival, growth, etc. --this study is listed as STUDY 2 and 3",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,8,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m44",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",1,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,300,6.25,0.004,108,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success based on comparison of survival and areal expansion of different transplanted initial shoot densities,NA,NA,99% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.6of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.6of6_week8,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bundles each with a different number of turions; see columns BD-BE,"Testing how different transplanted turion counts affects survival, growth, etc. --this study is listed as STUDY 2 and 3",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,8,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m45",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",2,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,300,6.25,0.0031,108,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success based on comparison of survival and areal expansion of different transplanted initial shoot densities,NA,NA,97% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.6of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.6of6_week12,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bundles each with a different number of turions; see columns BD-BE,"Testing how different transplanted turion counts affects survival, growth, etc. --this study is listed as STUDY 2 and 3",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,8.8,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m46",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",3,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,300,6.25,0.004,108,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success based on comparison of survival and areal expansion of different transplanted initial shoot densities,NA,NA,98% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.6of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.6of6_week24,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bundles each with a different number of turions; see columns BD-BE,"Testing how different transplanted turion counts affects survival, growth, etc. --this study is listed as STUDY 2 and 3",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,10,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m47",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",6,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,300,6.25,0.0026,108,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success based on comparison of survival and areal expansion of different transplanted initial shoot densities,NA,NA,95% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.6of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.6of6_week32,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bundles each with a different number of turions; see columns BD-BE,"Testing how different transplanted turion counts affects survival, growth, etc. --this study is listed as STUDY 2 and 3",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,8.4,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m48",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",8,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,300,6.25,0.0041,108,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success based on comparison of survival and areal expansion of different transplanted initial shoot densities,NA,NA,35% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.6of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.6of6_week48,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bundles each with a different number of turions; see columns BD-BE,"Testing how different transplanted turion counts affects survival, growth, etc. --this study is listed as STUDY 2 and 3",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,4,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m49",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",12,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,300,6.25,0.0003,108,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success based on comparison of survival and areal expansion of different transplanted initial shoot densities,NA,NA,100% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.7of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.7of6_week2,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bundles each with a different number of turions; see columns BD-BE,"Testing how different transplanted turion counts affects survival, growth, etc. --this study is listed as STUDY 2 and 3",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,8,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m50",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",1,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,400,6.25,0.0047,144,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success based on comparison of survival and areal expansion of different transplanted initial shoot densities,NA,NA,100% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.7of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.7of6_week8,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bundles each with a different number of turions; see columns BD-BE,"Testing how different transplanted turion counts affects survival, growth, etc. --this study is listed as STUDY 2 and 3",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,8,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m51",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",2,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,400,6.25,0.0053,144,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success based on comparison of survival and areal expansion of different transplanted initial shoot densities,NA,NA,99% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.7of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.7of6_week12,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bundles each with a different number of turions; see columns BD-BE,"Testing how different transplanted turion counts affects survival, growth, etc. --this study is listed as STUDY 2 and 3",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,8.8,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m52",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",3,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,400,6.25,0.0056,144,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success based on comparison of survival and areal expansion of different transplanted initial shoot densities,NA,NA,92% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.7of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.7of6_week24,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bundles each with a different number of turions; see columns BD-BE,"Testing how different transplanted turion counts affects survival, growth, etc. --this study is listed as STUDY 2 and 3",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,10,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m53",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",6,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,400,6.25,0.0046,144,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success based on comparison of survival and areal expansion of different transplanted initial shoot densities,NA,NA,82% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.7of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.7of6_week32,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bundles each with a different number of turions; see columns BD-BE,"Testing how different transplanted turion counts affects survival, growth, etc. --this study is listed as STUDY 2 and 3",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,8.4,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m54",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",8,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,400,6.25,0.003,144,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success based on comparison of survival and areal expansion of different transplanted initial shoot densities,NA,NA,35% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.7of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.7of6_week48,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bundles each with a different number of turions; see columns BD-BE,"Testing how different transplanted turion counts affects survival, growth, etc. --this study is listed as STUDY 2 and 3",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,4,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m55",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",12,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,400,6.25,0.0035,144,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success based on comparison of survival and areal expansion of different transplanted initial shoot densities,NA,NA,100% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.8of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.8of6_week2,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bundles each with a different number of turions; see columns BD-BE,"Testing how different transplanted turion counts affects survival, growth, etc. --this study is listed as STUDY 2 and 3",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,8,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m56",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",1,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,500,6.25,0.0078,180,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success based on comparison of survival and areal expansion of different transplanted initial shoot densities,NA,NA,94% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.8of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.8of6_week8,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bundles each with a different number of turions; see columns BD-BE,"Testing how different transplanted turion counts affects survival, growth, etc. --this study is listed as STUDY 2 and 3",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,8,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m57",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",2,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,500,6.25,1.08,180,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success based on comparison of survival and areal expansion of different transplanted initial shoot densities,NA,NA,93% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.8of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.8of6_week12,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bundles each with a different number of turions; see columns BD-BE,"Testing how different transplanted turion counts affects survival, growth, etc. --this study is listed as STUDY 2 and 3",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,8.8,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m58",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",3,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,500,6.25,1,180,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success based on comparison of survival and areal expansion of different transplanted initial shoot densities,NA,NA,90% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.8of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.8of6_week24,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bundles each with a different number of turions; see columns BD-BE,"Testing how different transplanted turion counts affects survival, growth, etc. --this study is listed as STUDY 2 and 3",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,10,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m59",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",6,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,500,6.25,0.0087,180,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success based on comparison of survival and areal expansion of different transplanted initial shoot densities,NA,NA,89% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.8of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.8of6_week32,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bundles each with a different number of turions; see columns BD-BE,"Testing how different transplanted turion counts affects survival, growth, etc. --this study is listed as STUDY 2 and 3",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,8.4,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m60",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",8,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,500,6.25,1.17,180,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success based on comparison of survival and areal expansion of different transplanted initial shoot densities,NA,NA,37% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.8of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot2.8of6_week48,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bundles each with a different number of turions; see columns BD-BE,"Testing how different transplanted turion counts affects survival, growth, etc. --this study is listed as STUDY 2 and 3",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,8.4,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m61",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",12,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,500,6.25,0.0011,180,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success based on comparison of survival and areal expansion of different transplanted initial shoot densities,NA,NA,37% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot3.1of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot3.1of6_week2,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bare root bundles made up of 8 turions each,"Testing whether growth/survival of transplants is affected by trimming (trimmed to 15 cm, trimmed to 30 cm and untrimmed treatments were used here)--this study is listed as STUDY 4",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,8,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m62",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",1,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,6.25,0.0033,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success assessed by comparing the survival rate for trimmed vs untrimmed shoots,NA,NA,100% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot3.1of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot3.1of6_week8,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bare root bundles made up of 8 turions each,"Testing whether growth/survival of transplants is affected by trimming (trimmed to 15 cm, trimmed to 30 cm and untrimmed treatments were used here)--this study is listed as STUDY 4",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,8,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m63",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",2,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,6.25,0.0031,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success assessed by comparing the survival rate for trimmed vs untrimmed shoots,NA,NA,91% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot3.1of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot3.1of6_week12,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bare root bundles made up of 8 turions each,"Testing whether growth/survival of transplants is affected by trimming (trimmed to 15 cm, trimmed to 30 cm and untrimmed treatments were used here)--this study is listed as STUDY 4",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,8.8,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m64",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",3,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,6.25,0.0055,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success assessed by comparing the survival rate for trimmed vs untrimmed shoots,NA,NA,93% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot3.1of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot3.1of6_week24,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bare root bundles made up of 8 turions each,"Testing whether growth/survival of transplants is affected by trimming (trimmed to 15 cm, trimmed to 30 cm and untrimmed treatments were used here)--this study is listed as STUDY 4",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,10,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m65",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",6,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,6.25,0.0057,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success assessed by comparing the survival rate for trimmed vs untrimmed shoots,NA,NA,88% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot3.1of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot3.1of6_week32,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bare root bundles made up of 8 turions each,"Testing whether growth/survival of transplants is affected by trimming (trimmed to 15 cm, trimmed to 30 cm and untrimmed treatments were used here)--this study is listed as STUDY 4",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,8.4,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m66",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",8,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,6.25,1.16,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success assessed by comparing the survival rate for trimmed vs untrimmed shoots,NA,NA,71% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot3.1of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot3.1of6_week48,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bare root bundles made up of 8 turions each,"Testing whether growth/survival of transplants is affected by trimming (trimmed to 15 cm, trimmed to 30 cm and untrimmed treatments were used here)--this study is listed as STUDY 4",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,4,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m67",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",12,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,6.25,0.0046,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success assessed by comparing the survival rate for trimmed vs untrimmed shoots,NA,NA,30% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot3.2of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot3.2of6_week2,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bare root bundles made up of 8 turions each,"Testing whether growth/survival of transplants is affected by trimming (trimmed to 15 cm, trimmed to 30 cm and untrimmed treatments were used here)--this study is listed as STUDY 4",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,8,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m68",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",1,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,6.25,0.002,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success assessed by comparing the survival rate for trimmed vs untrimmed shoots,NA,NA,97% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot3.2of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot3.2of6_week8,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bare root bundles made up of 8 turions each,"Testing whether growth/survival of transplants is affected by trimming (trimmed to 15 cm, trimmed to 30 cm and untrimmed treatments were used here)--this study is listed as STUDY 4",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,8,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m69",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",2,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,6.25,0.0021,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success assessed by comparing the survival rate for trimmed vs untrimmed shoots,NA,NA,92% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot3.2of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot3.2of6_week12,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bare root bundles made up of 8 turions each,"Testing whether growth/survival of transplants is affected by trimming (trimmed to 15 cm, trimmed to 30 cm and untrimmed treatments were used here)--this study is listed as STUDY 4",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,8.8,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m70",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",3,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,6.25,0.0021,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success assessed by comparing the survival rate for trimmed vs untrimmed shoots,NA,NA,92% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot3.2of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot3.2of6_week24,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bare root bundles made up of 8 turions each,"Testing whether growth/survival of transplants is affected by trimming (trimmed to 15 cm, trimmed to 30 cm and untrimmed treatments were used here)--this study is listed as STUDY 4",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,10,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m71",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",6,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,6.25,0.0022,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success assessed by comparing the survival rate for trimmed vs untrimmed shoots,NA,NA,84% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot3.2of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot3.2of6_week32,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bare root bundles made up of 8 turions each,"Testing whether growth/survival of transplants is affected by trimming (trimmed to 15 cm, trimmed to 30 cm and untrimmed treatments were used here)--this study is listed as STUDY 4",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,8.4,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m72",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",8,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,6.25,0.0041,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success assessed by comparing the survival rate for trimmed vs untrimmed shoots,NA,NA,68% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot3.2of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot3.2of6_week48,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bare root bundles made up of 8 turions each,"Testing whether growth/survival of transplants is affected by trimming (trimmed to 15 cm, trimmed to 30 cm and untrimmed treatments were used here)--this study is listed as STUDY 4",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,4,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m73",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",12,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,6.25,0.0019,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success assessed by comparing the survival rate for trimmed vs untrimmed shoots,NA,NA,19% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot3.3of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot3.3of6_week2,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bare root bundles made up of 8 turions each,"Testing whether growth/survival of transplants is affected by trimming (trimmed to 15 cm, trimmed to 30 cm and untrimmed treatments were used here)--this study is listed as STUDY 4",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,8,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m74",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",1,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,6.25,0.0025,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success assessed by comparing the survival rate for trimmed vs untrimmed shoots,NA,NA,No data on survival rate but report recommends trimming to 30 cm because it makes transplanting easier and there is no negative effect on growth when trimming to 30 cm,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot3.3of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot3.3of6_week8,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bare root bundles made up of 8 turions each,"Testing whether growth/survival of transplants is affected by trimming (trimmed to 15 cm, trimmed to 30 cm and untrimmed treatments were used here)--this study is listed as STUDY 4",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,8,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m75",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",2,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,6.25,0.0031,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success assessed by comparing the survival rate for trimmed vs untrimmed shoots,NA,NA,No data on survival rate but report recommends trimming to 30 cm because it makes transplanting easier and there is no negative effect on growth when trimming to 30 cm,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot3.3of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot3.3of6_week12,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bare root bundles made up of 8 turions each,"Testing whether growth/survival of transplants is affected by trimming (trimmed to 15 cm, trimmed to 30 cm and untrimmed treatments were used here)--this study is listed as STUDY 4",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,8.8,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m76",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",3,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,6.25,0.004,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success assessed by comparing the survival rate for trimmed vs untrimmed shoots,NA,NA,No data on survival rate but report recommends trimming to 30 cm because it makes transplanting easier and there is no negative effect on growth when trimming to 30 cm,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot3.3of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot3.3of6_week24,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bare root bundles made up of 8 turions each,"Testing whether growth/survival of transplants is affected by trimming (trimmed to 15 cm, trimmed to 30 cm and untrimmed treatments were used here)--this study is listed as STUDY 4",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,10,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m77",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",6,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,6.25,0.0053,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success assessed by comparing the survival rate for trimmed vs untrimmed shoots,NA,NA,No data on survival rate but report recommends trimming to 30 cm because it makes transplanting easier and there is no negative effect on growth when trimming to 30 cm,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot3.3of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot3.3of6_week32,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bare root bundles made up of 8 turions each,"Testing whether growth/survival of transplants is affected by trimming (trimmed to 15 cm, trimmed to 30 cm and untrimmed treatments were used here)--this study is listed as STUDY 4",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,8.4,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m78",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",8,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,6.25,0.0055,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success assessed by comparing the survival rate for trimmed vs untrimmed shoots,NA,NA,No data on survival rate but report recommends trimming to 30 cm because it makes transplanting easier and there is no negative effect on growth when trimming to 30 cm,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot3.3of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot3.3of6_week48,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bare root bundles made up of 8 turions each,"Testing whether growth/survival of transplants is affected by trimming (trimmed to 15 cm, trimmed to 30 cm and untrimmed treatments were used here)--this study is listed as STUDY 4",Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,4,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m79",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",12,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,6.25,0.0077,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success assessed by comparing the survival rate for trimmed vs untrimmed shoots,NA,NA,No data on survival rate but report recommends trimming to 30 cm because it makes transplanting easier and there is no negative effect on growth when trimming to 30 cm,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot4.1of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot4.1of6_week4,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bare root bundles made up of 8 turions each,Testing whether donor site affects transplant survival or growth--this study is listed as STUDY 5,Y,"Keil Cove, protected site near mouth of Bay, influenced by cooler, clearer open ocean water, muddy sediment on top of gravel is where eelgrass is found between -1 and -3 feet",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m80",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",1,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,0.005,0.005,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success assessed by comparing the survival rate and expansion for plots from different donor sites,NA,NA,93% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot4.1of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot4.1of6_week8,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bare root bundles made up of 8 turions each,Testing whether donor site affects transplant survival or growth--this study is listed as STUDY 5,Y,"Keil Cove, protected site near mouth of Bay, influenced by cooler, clearer open ocean water, muddy sediment on top of gravel is where eelgrass is found between -1 and -3 feet",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m81",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",2,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,0.005,0.0083,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success assessed by comparing the survival rate and expansion for plots from different donor sites,NA,NA,86% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot4.1of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot4.1of6_week12,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bare root bundles made up of 8 turions each,Testing whether donor site affects transplant survival or growth--this study is listed as STUDY 5,Y,"Keil Cove, protected site near mouth of Bay, influenced by cooler, clearer open ocean water, muddy sediment on top of gravel is where eelgrass is found between -1 and -3 feet",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m82",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",3,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,0.005,1.08,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success assessed by comparing the survival rate and expansion for plots from different donor sites,NA,NA,84% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot4.1of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot4.1of6_week24,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bare root bundles made up of 8 turions each,Testing whether donor site affects transplant survival or growth--this study is listed as STUDY 5,Y,"Keil Cove, protected site near mouth of Bay, influenced by cooler, clearer open ocean water, muddy sediment on top of gravel is where eelgrass is found between -1 and -3 feet",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m83",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",6,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,0.005,1.63,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success assessed by comparing the survival rate and expansion for plots from different donor sites,NA,NA,71% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot4.1of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot4.1of6_week32,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bare root bundles made up of 8 turions each,Testing whether donor site affects transplant survival or growth--this study is listed as STUDY 5,Y,"Keil Cove, protected site near mouth of Bay, influenced by cooler, clearer open ocean water, muddy sediment on top of gravel is where eelgrass is found between -1 and -3 feet",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m84",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",8,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,0.005,1.61,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success assessed by comparing the survival rate and expansion for plots from different donor sites,NA,NA,64% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot4.1of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot4.1of6_week48,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bare root bundles made up of 8 turions each,Testing whether donor site affects transplant survival or growth--this study is listed as STUDY 5,Y,"Keil Cove, protected site near mouth of Bay, influenced by cooler, clearer open ocean water, muddy sediment on top of gravel is where eelgrass is found between -1 and -3 feet",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m85",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",12,NA,-2,Depth ranged from -1 to -3 feet MLLW,ND,ND,200,0.005,1.73,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success assessed by comparing the survival rate and expansion for plots from different donor sites,NA,NA,10% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot4.2of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot4.2of6_week4,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bare root bundles made up of 8 turions each,Testing whether donor site affects transplant survival or growth--this study is listed as STUDY 5,Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m86",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",1,NA,-2,Depth ranged from -1 to -3 feet MLLW,ND,ND,200,0.005,0.005,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success assessed by comparing the survival rate and expansion for plots from different donor sites,NA,NA,96% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot4.2of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot4.2of6_week8,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bare root bundles made up of 8 turions each,Testing whether donor site affects transplant survival or growth--this study is listed as STUDY 5,Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m87",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",2,NA,-2,Depth ranged from -1 to -3 feet MLLW,ND,ND,200,0.005,0.0063,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success assessed by comparing the survival rate and expansion for plots from different donor sites,NA,NA,95% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot4.2of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot4.2of6_week12,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bare root bundles made up of 8 turions each,Testing whether donor site affects transplant survival or growth--this study is listed as STUDY 5,Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m88",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",3,NA,-2,Depth ranged from -1 to -3 feet MLLW,ND,ND,200,0.005,0.0079,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success assessed by comparing the survival rate and expansion for plots from different donor sites,NA,NA,86% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot4.2of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot4.2of6_week24,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bare root bundles made up of 8 turions each,Testing whether donor site affects transplant survival or growth--this study is listed as STUDY 5,Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m89",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",6,NA,-2,Depth ranged from -1 to -3 feet MLLW,ND,ND,200,0.005,0.0054,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success assessed by comparing the survival rate and expansion for plots from different donor sites,NA,NA,76% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot4.2of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot4.2of6_week32,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bare root bundles made up of 8 turions each,Testing whether donor site affects transplant survival or growth--this study is listed as STUDY 5,Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m90",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",8,NA,-2,Depth ranged from -1 to -3 feet MLLW,ND,ND,200,0.005,0.0085,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success assessed by comparing the survival rate and expansion for plots from different donor sites,NA,NA,68% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot4.2of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot4.2of6_week48,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bare root bundles made up of 8 turions each,Testing whether donor site affects transplant survival or growth--this study is listed as STUDY 5,Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m91",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",12,NA,-2,Depth ranged from -1 to -3 feet MLLW,ND,ND,200,0.005,1.4,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success assessed by comparing the survival rate and expansion for plots from different donor sites,NA,NA,29% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot4.3of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot4.3of6_week4,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bare root bundles made up of 8 turions each,Testing whether donor site affects transplant survival or growth--this study is listed as STUDY 5,Y,"Brooks Island, in Richmand, it's a protected site on eastern shore of Bay, sediment is muddy and eelgrass is most dense from -1 to -2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m92",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",1,NA,-1.5,Depth ranged from -1 to -2 feet MLLW,ND,ND,200,0.005,0.005,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success assessed by comparing the survival rate and expansion for plots from different donor sites,NA,NA,93% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot4.3of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot4.3of6_week8,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bare root bundles made up of 8 turions each,Testing whether donor site affects transplant survival or growth--this study is listed as STUDY 5,Y,"Brooks Island, in Richmand, it's a protected site on eastern shore of Bay, sediment is muddy and eelgrass is most dense from -1 to -2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m93",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",2,NA,-1.5,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,0.005,0.0075,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success assessed by comparing the survival rate and expansion for plots from different donor sites,NA,NA,90% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot4.3of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot4.3of6_week12,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bare root bundles made up of 8 turions each,Testing whether donor site affects transplant survival or growth--this study is listed as STUDY 5,Y,"Brooks Island, in Richmand, it's a protected site on eastern shore of Bay, sediment is muddy and eelgrass is most dense from -1 to -2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m94",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",3,NA,-1.5,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,0.005,0.0096,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success assessed by comparing the survival rate and expansion for plots from different donor sites,NA,NA,90% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot4.3of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot4.3of6_week24,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bare root bundles made up of 8 turions each,Testing whether donor site affects transplant survival or growth--this study is listed as STUDY 5,Y,"Brooks Island, in Richmand, it's a protected site on eastern shore of Bay, sediment is muddy and eelgrass is most dense from -1 to -2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m95",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",6,NA,-1.5,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,0.005,1.38,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success assessed by comparing the survival rate and expansion for plots from different donor sites,NA,NA,74% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot4.3of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot4.3of6_week32,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bare root bundles made up of 8 turions each,Testing whether donor site affects transplant survival or growth--this study is listed as STUDY 5,Y,"Brooks Island, in Richmand, it's a protected site on eastern shore of Bay, sediment is muddy and eelgrass is most dense from -1 to -2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m96",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",8,NA,-1.5,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,0.005,1.09,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success assessed by comparing the survival rate and expansion for plots from different donor sites,NA,NA,61% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot4.3of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot4.3of6_week48,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bare root bundles made up of 8 turions each,Testing whether donor site affects transplant survival or growth--this study is listed as STUDY 5,Y,"Brooks Island, in Richmand, it's a protected site on eastern shore of Bay, sediment is muddy and eelgrass is most dense from -1 to -2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m97",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",12,NA,-1.5,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,0.005,4.27,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success assessed by comparing the survival rate and expansion for plots from different donor sites,NA,NA,39% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot4.4of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot4.4of6_week4,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bare root bundles made up of 8 turions each,Testing whether donor site affects transplant survival or growth--this study is listed as STUDY 5,Y,"Bayfarm Island Shoal, unprotected, high-energy environment with strong currents, sediment is clean and sandy, and eelgrass typically grows at -2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m98",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",1,NA,-2,"Note: ""eelgrass typically grows at about -2 feet MLLW)",ND,ND,200,0.005,0.005,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success assessed by comparing the survival rate and expansion for plots from different donor sites,NA,NA,92% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot4.4of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot4.4of6_week8,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bare root bundles made up of 8 turions each,Testing whether donor site affects transplant survival or growth--this study is listed as STUDY 5,Y,"Bayfarm Island Shoal, unprotected, high-energy environment with strong currents, sediment is clean and sandy, and eelgrass typically grows at -2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m99",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",2,NA,-2,"Note: ""eelgrass typically grows at about -2 feet MLLW)",ND,ND,200,0.005,0.0036,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success assessed by comparing the survival rate and expansion for plots from different donor sites,NA,NA,86% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot4.4of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot4.4of6_week12,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bare root bundles made up of 8 turions each,Testing whether donor site affects transplant survival or growth--this study is listed as STUDY 5,Y,"Bayfarm Island Shoal, unprotected, high-energy environment with strong currents, sediment is clean and sandy, and eelgrass typically grows at -2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m100",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",3,NA,-2,"Note: ""eelgrass typically grows at about -2 feet MLLW)",ND,ND,200,0.005,0.0023,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success assessed by comparing the survival rate and expansion for plots from different donor sites,NA,NA,84% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot4.4of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot4.4of6_week24,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bare root bundles made up of 8 turions each,Testing whether donor site affects transplant survival or growth--this study is listed as STUDY 5,Y,"Bayfarm Island Shoal, unprotected, high-energy environment with strong currents, sediment is clean and sandy, and eelgrass typically grows at -2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m101",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",6,NA,-2,"Note: ""eelgrass typically grows at about -2 feet MLLW)",ND,ND,200,0.005,0.0013,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success assessed by comparing the survival rate and expansion for plots from different donor sites,NA,NA,60% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot4.4of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot4.4of6_week32,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bare root bundles made up of 8 turions each,Testing whether donor site affects transplant survival or growth--this study is listed as STUDY 5,Y,"Bayfarm Island Shoal, unprotected, high-energy environment with strong currents, sediment is clean and sandy, and eelgrass typically grows at -2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m102",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",8,NA,-2,"Note: ""eelgrass typically grows at about -2 feet MLLW)",ND,ND,200,0.005,0.0015,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success assessed by comparing the survival rate and expansion for plots from different donor sites,NA,NA,50% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot4.4of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot4.4of6_week48,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bare root bundles made up of 8 turions each,Testing whether donor site affects transplant survival or growth--this study is listed as STUDY 5,Y,"Bayfarm Island Shoal, unprotected, high-energy environment with strong currents, sediment is clean and sandy, and eelgrass typically grows at -2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m103",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",12,NA,-2,"Note: ""eelgrass typically grows at about -2 feet MLLW)",ND,ND,200,0.005,0.0011,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,Relative success assessed by comparing the survival rate and expansion for plots from different donor sites,NA,NA,19% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot5.1.a_of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot5.1.a_of6_week4,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bare root bundles made up of 8 turions each,Presidio Shoals: Testing transplants on recently built plateaus,Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m104",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",1,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,ND,ND,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Relative success assessed by comparing the survival rate on the plateaus of two different sediment sources and two different transplant techniques (bare root = BR, and sediment plugs = SP)",NA,NA,84% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot5.1.a_of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot5.1.a_of6_week8,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bare root bundles made up of 8 turions each,Presidio Shoals: Testing transplants on recently built plateaus,Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m105",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",2,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,ND,ND,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Relative success assessed by comparing the survival rate on the plateaus of two different sediment sources and two different transplant techniques (bare root = BR, and sediment plugs = SP)",NA,NA,68% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot5.1.a_of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot5.1.a_of6_week24,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bare root bundles made up of 8 turions each,Presidio Shoals: Testing transplants on recently built plateaus,Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m106",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",6,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,ND,ND,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Relative success assessed by comparing the survival rate on the plateaus of two different sediment sources and two different transplant techniques (bare root = BR, and sediment plugs = SP)",NA,NA,45% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot5.1.a_of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot5.1.a_of6_week32,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bare root bundles made up of 8 turions each,Presidio Shoals: Testing transplants on recently built plateaus,Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m107",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",8,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,ND,ND,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Relative success assessed by comparing the survival rate on the plateaus of two different sediment sources and two different transplant techniques (bare root = BR, and sediment plugs = SP)",NA,NA,15% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot5.1.b_of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot5.1.b_of6_week4,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Plug,6 inch wide PVC core plugs with as many shoots as were present in the plug (varied),Presidio Shoals: Testing transplants on recently built plateaus,Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m108",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",1,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,ND,ND,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Relative success assessed by comparing the survival rate on the plateaus of two different sediment sources and two different transplant techniques (bare root = BR, and sediment plugs = SP)",NA,NA,100% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot5.1.b_of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot5.1.b_of6_week8,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Plug,6 inch wide PVC core plugs with as many shoots as were present in the plug (varied),Presidio Shoals: Testing transplants on recently built plateaus,Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m109",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",2,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,ND,ND,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Relative success assessed by comparing the survival rate on the plateaus of two different sediment sources and two different transplant techniques (bare root = BR, and sediment plugs = SP)",NA,NA,84% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot5.1.b_of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot5.1.b_of6_week24,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Plug,6 inch wide PVC core plugs with as many shoots as were present in the plug (varied),Presidio Shoals: Testing transplants on recently built plateaus,Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m110",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",6,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,ND,ND,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Relative success assessed by comparing the survival rate on the plateaus of two different sediment sources and two different transplant techniques (bare root = BR, and sediment plugs = SP)",NA,NA,80% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot5.1.b_of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot5.1.b_of6_week32,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Plug,6 inch wide PVC core plugs with as many shoots as were present in the plug (varied),Presidio Shoals: Testing transplants on recently built plateaus,Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m111",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",8,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,ND,ND,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Relative success assessed by comparing the survival rate on the plateaus of two different sediment sources and two different transplant techniques (bare root = BR, and sediment plugs = SP)",NA,NA,20% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot5.1.b_of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot5.1.b_of6_week48,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Plug,6 inch wide PVC core plugs with as many shoots as were present in the plug (varied),Presidio Shoals: Testing transplants on recently built plateaus,Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m112",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",12,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,ND,ND,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Relative success assessed by comparing the survival rate on the plateaus of two different sediment sources and two different transplant techniques (bare root = BR, and sediment plugs = SP)",NA,NA,0% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot5.2.a_of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot5.2.a_of6_week4,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bare root bundles made up of 8 turions each,Angel Island Sediment Plateaus: Testing transplants on recently built plateaus,Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,8,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m114",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",1,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,ND,ND,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Relative success assessed by comparing the survival rate on the plateaus of two different sediment sources and two different transplant techniques (bare root = BR, and sediment plugs = SP)",NA,NA,35% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot5.2.a_of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot5.2.a_of6_week8,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bare root bundles made up of 8 turions each,Angel Island Sediment Plateaus: Testing transplants on recently built plateaus,Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,8,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m115",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",2,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,ND,ND,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Relative success assessed by comparing the survival rate on the plateaus of two different sediment sources and two different transplant techniques (bare root = BR, and sediment plugs = SP)",NA,NA,0% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot5.2.a_of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot5.2.a_of6_week24,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bare root bundles made up of 8 turions each,Angel Island Sediment Plateaus: Testing transplants on recently built plateaus,Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,8.8,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m116",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",6,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,ND,ND,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Relative success assessed by comparing the survival rate on the plateaus of two different sediment sources and two different transplant techniques (bare root = BR, and sediment plugs = SP)",NA,NA,0% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot5.2.a_of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot5.2.a_of6_week32,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bare root bundles made up of 8 turions each,Angel Island Sediment Plateaus: Testing transplants on recently built plateaus,Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,10,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m117",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",8,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,ND,ND,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Relative success assessed by comparing the survival rate on the plateaus of two different sediment sources and two different transplant techniques (bare root = BR, and sediment plugs = SP)",NA,NA,0% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot5.2.b_of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot5.2.b_of6_week4,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Plug,6 inch wide PVC core plugs with as many shoots as were present in the plug (varied),Angel Island Sediment Plateaus: Testing transplants on recently built plateaus,Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,4,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m118",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",1,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,ND,ND,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Relative success assessed by comparing the survival rate on the plateaus of two different sediment sources and two different transplant techniques (bare root = BR, and sediment plugs = SP)",NA,NA,23% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot5.2.b_of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot5.2.b_of6_week8,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Plug,6 inch wide PVC core plugs with as many shoots as were present in the plug (varied),Angel Island Sediment Plateaus: Testing transplants on recently built plateaus,Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,7.6,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m119",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",2,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,ND,ND,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Relative success assessed by comparing the survival rate on the plateaus of two different sediment sources and two different transplant techniques (bare root = BR, and sediment plugs = SP)",NA,NA,11% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot5.2.b_of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot5.2.b_of6_week24,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Plug,6 inch wide PVC core plugs with as many shoots as were present in the plug (varied),Angel Island Sediment Plateaus: Testing transplants on recently built plateaus,Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,8,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m120",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",6,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,ND,ND,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Relative success assessed by comparing the survival rate on the plateaus of two different sediment sources and two different transplant techniques (bare root = BR, and sediment plugs = SP)",NA,NA,0% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot5.2.b_of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot5.2.b_of6_week48,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Plug,6 inch wide PVC core plugs with as many shoots as were present in the plug (varied),Angel Island Sediment Plateaus: Testing transplants on recently built plateaus,Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,8,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m121",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",12,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,ND,ND,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Relative success assessed by comparing the survival rate on the plateaus of two different sediment sources and two different transplant techniques (bare root = BR, and sediment plugs = SP)",NA,NA,0% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot6.1of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot6.1of6_week4,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bare root bundles made up of 8 turions each,Testing how light limitation affects growth and survival of transplants using two different transplanting techniques,Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,4,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m122",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",1,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,ND,0.002,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Relative success by comparing two methods and how they do in low light environments, study showed overall 8% survival which is lower than previous studies that showed closer to 30+%",NA,NA,23% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot6.1of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot6.1of6_week8,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bare root bundles made up of 8 turions each,Testing how light limitation affects growth and survival of transplants using two different transplanting techniques,Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,7.6,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m123",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",2,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,ND,0.0027,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Relative success by comparing two methods and how they do in low light environments, study showed overall 8% survival which is lower than previous studies that showed closer to 30+%",NA,NA,11% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot6.1of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot6.1of6_week12,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bare root bundles made up of 8 turions each,Testing how light limitation affects growth and survival of transplants using two different transplanting techniques,Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,7.6,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m124",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",3,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,ND,0.0018,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Relative success by comparing two methods and how they do in low light environments, study showed overall 8% survival which is lower than previous studies that showed closer to 30+%",NA,NA,11% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot6.1of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot6.1of6_week24,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bare root bundles made up of 8 turions each,Testing how light limitation affects growth and survival of transplants using two different transplanting techniques,Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,8,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m125",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",6,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,ND,0.0012,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Relative success by comparing two methods and how they do in low light environments, study showed overall 8% survival which is lower than previous studies that showed closer to 30+%",NA,NA,0% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot6.1of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot6.1of6_week48,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Popsicle stick,25 bare root bundles made up of 8 turions each,Testing how light limitation affects growth and survival of transplants using two different transplanting techniques,Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,8,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m126",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",12,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,ND,0.0002,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Relative success by comparing two methods and how they do in low light environments, study showed overall 8% survival which is lower than previous studies that showed closer to 30+%",NA,NA,0% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot6.2of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot6.2of6_week4,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Plug,6 inch wide PVC core plugs with as many shoots as were present in the plug (varied),Testing how light limitation affects growth and survival of transplants using two different transplanting techniques,Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,4,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m127",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",1,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,ND,0.0006,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Relative success by comparing two methods and how they do in low light environments, study showed overall 8% survival which is lower than previous studies that showed closer to 30+%",NA,NA,23% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot6.2of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot6.2of6_week8,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Plug,6 inch wide PVC core plugs with as many shoots as were present in the plug (varied),Testing how light limitation affects growth and survival of transplants using two different transplanting techniques,Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,7.6,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m128",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",2,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,ND,0.0005,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Relative success by comparing two methods and how they do in low light environments, study showed overall 8% survival which is lower than previous studies that showed closer to 30+%",NA,NA,11% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot6.2of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot6.2of6_week12,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Plug,6 inch wide PVC core plugs with as many shoots as were present in the plug (varied),Testing how light limitation affects growth and survival of transplants using two different transplanting techniques,Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,7.6,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m129",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",3,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,ND,0.0005,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Relative success by comparing two methods and how they do in low light environments, study showed overall 8% survival which is lower than previous studies that showed closer to 30+%",NA,NA,11% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot6.2of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot6.2of6_week24,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Plug,6 inch wide PVC core plugs with as many shoots as were present in the plug (varied),Testing how light limitation affects growth and survival of transplants using two different transplanting techniques,Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,8,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m130",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",6,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,ND,0.0005,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Relative success by comparing two methods and how they do in low light environments, study showed overall 8% survival which is lower than previous studies that showed closer to 30+%",NA,NA,0% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot6.2of6,SFOakBayBridgeESpanSeismicSafetyProj_plot6.2of6_week48,NA,"CalTrans, Merkel & Associates",San Francisco,"Emeryville Flats, San Francisco/Oakland Bay, site A",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Plug,6 inch wide PVC core plugs with as many shoots as were present in the plug (varied),Testing how light limitation affects growth and survival of transplants using two different transplanting techniques,Y,"Emeryville Flats, expected losses with construction of bridge, were contracted to remove and transplant bed; un-protected, high-energy bed with strong currents, mostly sandy, little mud, seagrass occurs between 0 to - 2 feet MLLW",ND,ND,7.6,ND,8,ND,NA,NA,"Natural eelgrass cover in the study area ranged from 5 to 40%; see Fig 2 in 'Eelgrass_Transplant_Final_Report_0_13da smaller.pdf', the data reported is converted from what is reported in the report and stated as per 2.5 m2",2002,August,Summer,1,"4, 8, 12, 24, 32, and 48 weeks post restoration",12,NA,1,"Depth ranged from 3 to -1 feet, took the average",ND,ND,200,ND,0,72,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Relative success by comparing two methods and how they do in low light environments, study showed overall 8% survival which is lower than previous studies that showed closer to 30+%",NA,NA,0% survival rate,N,Y,Y,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,"Y; DAC (Diffuse attenuation coefficient), PAR, TOC, Erosion/Accretion, Bathymetry","Erosion/Accretion was only measured for Study 5 where the plateaus were built; Water quality stations were located in the center of each grid, see Report for diagram of array",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_HabitatRestorationForSalmonids,SFB_HabitatRestorationForSalmonids_plot1.1of2,SFB_HabitatRestorationForSalmonids_plot1.1of2_8mo,NA,"NFWF, NOAA, Marin Rod and Gun Club",San Francisco,"Marin Rod and Gun Club (MRGC), San Rafael, CA",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Not stated, but likely",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,18 shoots were deployed in smaller clusters of 6 across 3 0.25m2 plots,"Testing how eelgrass, eelgrass + oyster reef, and control plots affect fish visitation and whether eelgrass is affected by surrounded oyster reefs, they also measured macroalgae (wet weight) and assessed epifaunal community assemblage but none of this is included in the report (data wise)",N,Point San Pablo bed (northeast),ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,ND,2008,August,Summer,2,"semi-annually (April 2009, June 2009, October 2010)",8,NA,ND,"Listed as ""shallow subtidal""",ND,ND,108,1.5,ND,24,4.4,ND,ND,NA,"Appears to be more of a pilot study, kind of a proof of concept investigation to demonstrate that once you provide structure (compared to control bare plots) you get more invertebrates and more invertebrates and structure/complex habitat attracts more fish",NA,NA,"Also assessed flowering shoot canopy heights and densities, epifaunal communities per shoots and in and around shoots using two different techniques",N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,NA,ND,Y,ND,ND (see Notes),"Used acoustic tagging to measure fish visitation and also assessed epifaunal community diversity and abundance (not reported), this may be used in later reports to show that food supply for species (i.e. salmonids) is quick to colonize following the establishment of structure and complex habitat (i.e. oyster reefs and eelgrass beds)",N,N,N,N,NA
SFB_HabitatRestorationForSalmonids,SFB_HabitatRestorationForSalmonids_plot1.2of2,SFB_HabitatRestorationForSalmonids_plot1.2of2_8mo,NA,"NFWF, NOAA, Marin Rod and Gun Club",San Francisco,"Marin Rod and Gun Club (MRGC), San Rafael, CA",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Not stated, but likely",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Seed,15 flowering shoots were placed in mesh bags as seed-deployed buoy systems,"Testing how eelgrass, eelgrass + oyster reef, and control plots affect fish visitation and whether eelgrass is affected by surrounded oyster reefs, they also measured macroalgae (wet weight) and assessed epifaunal community assemblage but none of this is included in the report (data wise)",N,Point San Pablo bed (northeast),ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,ND,2008,August,Summer,2,"semi-annually (April 2009, June 2009, October 2010)",8,NA,ND,"Listed as ""shallow subtidal""",ND,ND,108,ND,ND,24,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Appears to be more of a pilot study, kind of a proof of concept investigation to demonstrate that once you provide structure (compared to control bare plots) you get more invertebrates and more invertebrates and structure/complex habitat attracts more fish",NA,NA,Visibility was too poor to assess whether seeding was effective (by counting seedlings),N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,NA,ND,Y,ND,ND (see Notes),"Used acoustic tagging to measure fish visitation and also assessed epifaunal community diversity and abundance (not reported), this may be used in later reports to show that food supply for species (i.e. salmonids) is quick to colonize following the establishment of structure and complex habitat (i.e. oyster reefs and eelgrass beds)",N,N,N,N,NA
SFB_HabitatRestorationForSalmonids,SFB_HabitatRestorationForSalmonids_plot1.1of2,SFB_HabitatRestorationForSalmonids_plot1.1of2_10mo,NA,"NFWF, NOAA, Marin Rod and Gun Club",San Francisco,"Marin Rod and Gun Club (MRGC), San Rafael, CA",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Not stated, but likely",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,18 shoots were deployed in smaller clusters of 6 across 3 0.25m2 plots,"Testing how eelgrass, eelgrass + oyster reef, and control plots affect fish visitation and whether eelgrass is affected by surrounded oyster reefs, they also measured macroalgae (wet weight) and assessed epifaunal community assemblage but none of this is included in the report (data wise)",N,Point San Pablo bed (northeast),ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,ND,2008,August,Summer,2,"semi-annually (April 2009, June 2009, October 2010)",10,NA,ND,"Listed as ""shallow subtidal""",ND,ND,108,1.5,ND,24,7.8,ND,ND,NA,"Appears to be more of a pilot study, kind of a proof of concept investigation to demonstrate that once you provide structure (compared to control bare plots) you get more invertebrates and more invertebrates and structure/complex habitat attracts more fish",NA,NA,"Also assessed flowering shoot canopy heights and densities, epifaunal communities per shoots and in and around shoots using two different techniques",N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,NA,ND,Y,ND,ND (see Notes),"Used acoustic tagging to measure fish visitation and also assessed epifaunal community diversity and abundance (not reported), this may be used in later reports to show that food supply for species (i.e. salmonids) is quick to colonize following the establishment of structure and complex habitat (i.e. oyster reefs and eelgrass beds)",N,N,N,N,NA
SFB_HabitatRestorationForSalmonids,SFB_HabitatRestorationForSalmonids_plot1.2of2,SFB_HabitatRestorationForSalmonids_plot1.2of2_10mo,NA,"NFWF, NOAA, Marin Rod and Gun Club",San Francisco,"Marin Rod and Gun Club (MRGC), San Rafael, CA",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Not stated, but likely",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Seed,15 flowering shoots were placed in mesh bags as seed-deployed buoy systems,"Testing how eelgrass, eelgrass + oyster reef, and control plots affect fish visitation and whether eelgrass is affected by surrounded oyster reefs, they also measured macroalgae (wet weight) and assessed epifaunal community assemblage but none of this is included in the report (data wise)",N,Point San Pablo bed (northeast),ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,ND,2008,August,Summer,2,"semi-annually (April 2009, June 2009, October 2010)",10,NA,ND,"Listed as ""shallow subtidal""",ND,ND,108,ND,ND,24,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Appears to be more of a pilot study, kind of a proof of concept investigation to demonstrate that once you provide structure (compared to control bare plots) you get more invertebrates and more invertebrates and structure/complex habitat attracts more fish",NA,NA,Visibility was too poor to assess whether seeding was effective (by counting seedlings),N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,NA,ND,Y,ND,ND (see Notes),"Used acoustic tagging to measure fish visitation and also assessed epifaunal community diversity and abundance (not reported), this may be used in later reports to show that food supply for species (i.e. salmonids) is quick to colonize following the establishment of structure and complex habitat (i.e. oyster reefs and eelgrass beds)",N,N,N,N,NA
SFB_HabitatRestorationForSalmonids,SFB_HabitatRestorationForSalmonids_plot1.1of2,SFB_HabitatRestorationForSalmonids_plot1.1of2_26mo,NA,"NFWF, NOAA, Marin Rod and Gun Club",San Francisco,"Marin Rod and Gun Club (MRGC), San Rafael, CA",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Not stated, but likely",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,18 shoots were deployed in smaller clusters of 6 across 3 0.25m2 plots,"Testing how eelgrass, eelgrass + oyster reef, and control plots affect fish visitation and whether eelgrass is affected by surrounded oyster reefs, they also measured macroalgae (wet weight) and assessed epifaunal community assemblage but none of this is included in the report (data wise)",N,Point San Pablo bed (northeast),ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,ND,2008,August,Summer,2,"semi-annually (April 2009, June 2009, October 2010)",26,NA,ND,"Listed as ""shallow subtidal""",ND,ND,108,1.5,ND,24,19.7,ND,ND,NA,"Appears to be more of a pilot study, kind of a proof of concept investigation to demonstrate that once you provide structure (compared to control bare plots) you get more invertebrates and more invertebrates and structure/complex habitat attracts more fish",NA,NA,"Reported that in Oct 2010, canopy height (max) ranged from 180-200 cm so took the average between the two; Also assessed flowering shoot canopy heights and densities, epifaunal communities per shoots and in and around shoots using two different techniques",N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,NA,ND,Y,ND,ND (see Notes),"Used acoustic tagging to measure fish visitation and also assessed epifaunal community diversity and abundance (not reported), this may be used in later reports to show that food supply for species (i.e. salmonids) is quick to colonize following the establishment of structure and complex habitat (i.e. oyster reefs and eelgrass beds)",N,N,N,N,NA
SFB_HabitatRestorationForSalmonids,SFB_HabitatRestorationForSalmonids_plot1.2of2,SFB_HabitatRestorationForSalmonids_plot1.2of2_26mo,NA,"NFWF, NOAA, Marin Rod and Gun Club",San Francisco,"Marin Rod and Gun Club (MRGC), San Rafael, CA",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Not stated, but likely",N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,Seed,15 flowering shoots were placed in mesh bags as seed-deployed buoy systems,"Testing how eelgrass, eelgrass + oyster reef, and control plots affect fish visitation and whether eelgrass is affected by surrounded oyster reefs, they also measured macroalgae (wet weight) and assessed epifaunal community assemblage but none of this is included in the report (data wise)",N,Point San Pablo bed (northeast),ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,ND,2008,August,Summer,2,"semi-annually (April 2009, June 2009, October 2010)",26,NA,ND,"Listed as ""shallow subtidal""",ND,ND,108,ND,ND,24,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Appears to be more of a pilot study, kind of a proof of concept investigation to demonstrate that once you provide structure (compared to control bare plots) you get more invertebrates and more invertebrates and structure/complex habitat attracts more fish",NA,NA,Visibility was too poor to assess whether seeding was effective (by counting seedlings),N,N,N,N,N,N,Y,N,N,NA,NA,ND,Y,ND,ND (see Notes),"Used acoustic tagging to measure fish visitation and also assessed epifaunal community diversity and abundance (not reported), this may be used in later reports to show that food supply for species (i.e. salmonids) is quick to colonize following the establishment of structure and complex habitat (i.e. oyster reefs and eelgrass beds)",N,N,N,N,NA
SFB_HabitatRestorationForSalmonids,SFB_HabitatRestorationForSalmonids_plot2of2,SFB_HabitatRestorationForSalmonids_plot2of2_0mo,NA,"NFWF, NOAA, Marin Rod and Gun Club",San Francisco,"North end of Cesar Chavez Park, Berkeley CA",37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Not stated, but likely",N,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,120 shoots were transplanted across 24 smaller (0.5m2) plots that spread across 8 sites within the Berkely site,"Interested in evaluating invert recruitment into eelgrass plots with and without adjacent oyster reefs, but the results from this project are not included in the report, report states that it was (at the time of report) too soon to monitor for progress of Berkeley site restoration, check with Kathy about other questions and whether this data is now available.",N,"Keller Beach, Richmond CA",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,ND,2010,July,Summer,2,"semi-annually (April 2009, June 2009, October 2010)",0,NA,ND,"Listed as ""substantially deeper than the MRGC site""",ND,ND,120,12,ND,15,ND,ND,ND,NA,"Appears to be more of a pilot study, kind of a proof of concept investigation to demonstrate that once you provide structure (compared to control bare plots) you get more invertebrates and more invertebrates and structure/complex habitat attracts more fish",NA,NA,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,ND,Y,ND,ND (see Notes),"Used acoustic tagging to measure fish visitation and also assessed epifaunal community diversity and abundance (not reported), this may be used in later reports to show that food supply for species (i.e. salmonids) is quick to colonize following the establishment of structure and complex habitat (i.e. oyster reefs and eelgrass beds)",N,N,N,N,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorCB_plot1.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorCB_plot1.1of3_11mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2017",11,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,14.6,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Grabbed data from Table 1, July 2007 is the only data (raw) reported, other data (March-June 2007 and August 2007-August 2008 was extracted from graphs); Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods ",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorKB_plot1.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorKB_plot1.1of3_11mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2018",11,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,18.3,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Grabbed data from Table 1, July 2007 is the only data (raw) reported, other data (March-June 2007 and August 2007-August 2008 was extracted from graphs); Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods ",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorPSP_plot1.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorPSP_plot1.1of3_11mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2019",11,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,13.8,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Grabbed data from Table 1, July 2007 is the only data (raw) reported, other data (March-June 2007 and August 2007-August 2008 was extracted from graphs); Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods ",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorCB_plot2.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorCB_plot2.1of3_11mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2020",11,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,6,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Grabbed data from Table 1, July 2007 is the only data (raw) reported, other data (March-June 2007 and August 2007-August 2008 was extracted from graphs); Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,YSI sensors were only installed at MRGC and RB sites (not MCDS),ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorKB_plot2.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorKB_plot2.1of3_11mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2021",11,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,7.4,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Grabbed data from Table 1, July 2007 is the only data (raw) reported, other data (March-June 2007 and August 2007-August 2008 was extracted from graphs); Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,YSI sensors were only installed at MRGC and RB sites (not MCDS),ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorPSP_plot2.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorPSP_plot2.1of3_11mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2022",11,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,5.3,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Grabbed data from Table 1, July 2007 is the only data (raw) reported, other data (March-June 2007 and August 2007-August 2008 was extracted from graphs); Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,YSI sensors were only installed at MRGC and RB sites (not MCDS),ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorCB_plot3.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorCB_plot3.1of3_11mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot3=siteRB, 3.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2023",11,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,0,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,N,N,"Grabbed data from Table 1, July 2007 is the only data (raw) reported, other data (March-June 2007 and August 2007-August 2008 was extracted from graphs); Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods ",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorKB_plot3.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorKB_plot3.1of3_11mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot3=siteRB, 3.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2024",11,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,0,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,N,N,"Grabbed data from Table 1, July 2007 is the only data (raw) reported, other data (March-June 2007 and August 2007-August 2008 was extracted from graphs); Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods ",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorPSP_plot3.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorPSP_plot3.1of3_11mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot3=siteRB, 3.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2025",11,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,2,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Grabbed data from Table 1, July 2007 is the only data (raw) reported, other data (March-June 2007 and August 2007-August 2008 was extracted from graphs); Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods ",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorCB_plot1.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorCB_plot1.2of3_11mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2026",11,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,NA,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,N,N,"no TERFS deployed for donor bed CB; Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorKB_plot1.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorKB_plot1.2of3_11mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2027",11,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,30.3,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Grabbed data from Table 1, July 2007 is the only data (raw) reported, other data (March-June 2007 and August 2007-August 2008 was extracted from graphs); Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods ",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorPSP_plot1.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorPSP_plot1.2of3_11mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2028",11,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,0,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,N,N,"Grabbed data from Table 1, July 2007 is the only data (raw) reported, other data (March-June 2007 and August 2007-August 2008 was extracted from graphs); Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods ",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorCB_plot2.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorCB_plot2.2of3_11mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2029",11,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,NA,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,N,N,"no TERFS deployed for donor bed CB; Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorKB_plot2.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorKB_plot2.2of3_11mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2030",11,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,0,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,N,N,"Grabbed data from Table 1, July 2007 is the only data (raw) reported, other data (March-June 2007 and August 2007-August 2008 was extracted from graphs); Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods ",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorPSP_plot2.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorPSP_plot2.2of3_11mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2031",11,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,0,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,N,N,"Grabbed data from Table 1, July 2007 is the only data (raw) reported, other data (March-June 2007 and August 2007-August 2008 was extracted from graphs); Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods ",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorCB_plot3.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorCB_plot3.2of3_11mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot3=siteRB, 3.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2032",11,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,NA,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,N,N,"no TERFS deployed for donor bed CB; Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorKB_plot3.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorKB_plot3.2of3_11mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot3=siteRB, 3.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2033",11,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,1.3,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Grabbed data from Table 1, July 2007 is the only data (raw) reported, other data (March-June 2007 and August 2007-August 2008 was extracted from graphs); Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods ",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorPSP_plot3.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorPSP_plot3.2of3_11mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot3=siteRB, 3.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2034",11,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,3,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Grabbed data from Table 1, July 2007 is the only data (raw) reported, other data (March-June 2007 and August 2007-August 2008 was extracted from graphs); Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods ",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorCB_plot2.3of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorCB_plot2.3of3_11mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Hand broadcast seeding (from ~ 20 flowering shoots across a 1m x 4m area,"only did broadcast seeding at MCDS and RB sites (NOT MRGC); Broadcast seeding "".3""=Broadcast-seeded",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2029",11,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,20,4,0,NA,0,0,0,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,N,N,"By June 2007 there were no seedlings within the plot area, in March 2007 they counted 9 seedlings from Broadcasting (across all plots) and these did not persist",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorKB_plot2.3of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorKB_plot2.3of3_11mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Hand broadcast seeding (from ~ 20 flowering shoots across a 1m x 4m area,"only did broadcast seeding at MCDS and RB sites (NOT MRGC); Broadcast seeding "".3""=Broadcast-seeded",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2030",11,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,20,4,0,NA,0,0,0,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,N,N,"By June 2007 there were no seedlings within the plot area, in March 2007 they counted 9 seedlings from Broadcasting (across all plots) and these did not persist",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorPSP_plot2.3of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorPSP_plot2.3of3_11mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Hand broadcast seeding (from ~ 20 flowering shoots across a 1m x 4m area,"only did broadcast seeding at MCDS and RB sites (NOT MRGC); Broadcast seeding "".3""=Broadcast-seeded",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2031",11,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,20,4,0,NA,0,0,0,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,N,N,"By June 2007 there were no seedlings within the plot area, in March 2007 they counted 9 seedlings from Broadcasting (across all plots) and these did not persist",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorCB_plot3.3of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorCB_plot3.3of3_11mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Hand broadcast seeding (from ~ 20 flowering shoots across a 1m x 4m area,"only did broadcast seeding at MCDS and RB sites (NOT MRGC); Broadcast seeding "".3""=Broadcast-seeded",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2032",11,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,20,4,0,NA,0,0,0,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,N,N,"By June 2007 there were no seedlings within the plot area, in March 2007 they counted 9 seedlings from Broadcasting (across all plots) and these did not persist",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorKB_plot3.3of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorKB_plot3.3of3_11mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Hand broadcast seeding (from ~ 20 flowering shoots across a 1m x 4m area,"only did broadcast seeding at MCDS and RB sites (NOT MRGC); Broadcast seeding "".3""=Broadcast-seeded",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2033",11,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,20,4,0,NA,0,0,0,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,N,N,"By June 2007 there were no seedlings within the plot area, in March 2007 they counted 9 seedlings from Broadcasting (across all plots) and these did not persist",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorPSP_plot3.3of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorPSP_plot3.3of3_11mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Hand broadcast seeding (from ~ 20 flowering shoots across a 1m x 4m area,"only did broadcast seeding at MCDS and RB sites (NOT MRGC); Broadcast seeding "".3""=Broadcast-seeded",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2034",11,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,20,4,0,NA,0,0,0,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,N,N,"By June 2007 there were no seedlings within the plot area, in March 2007 they counted 9 seedlings from Broadcasting (across all plots) and these did not persist",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorCB_plot1.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorCB_plot1.1of3_8mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2017",8,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,7,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Column BF, unsure what ""patch"" size is, need to check with Kathy, also this data was extracted from the graphs themselves using web-based graph digitizer (raw data was not in report); A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorKB_plot1.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorKB_plot1.1of3_8mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2018",8,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,10,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Column BF, unsure what ""patch"" size is, need to check with Kathy, also this data was extracted from the graphs themselves using web-based graph digitizer (raw data was not in report); A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorPSP_plot1.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorPSP_plot1.1of3_8mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2019",8,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,10,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Column BF, unsure what ""patch"" size is, need to check with Kathy, also this data was extracted from the graphs themselves using web-based graph digitizer (raw data was not in report); A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorCB_plot2.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorCB_plot2.1of3_8mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2020",8,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,0,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,N,N,"Column BF, unsure what ""patch"" size is, need to check with Kathy, also this data was extracted from the graphs themselves using web-based graph digitizer (raw data was not in report); A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorKB_plot2.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorKB_plot2.1of3_8mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2021",8,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,0,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,N,N,"Column BF, unsure what ""patch"" size is, need to check with Kathy, also this data was extracted from the graphs themselves using web-based graph digitizer (raw data was not in report); A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorPSP_plot2.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorPSP_plot2.1of3_8mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2022",8,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,0,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,N,N,"Column BF, unsure what ""patch"" size is, need to check with Kathy, also this data was extracted from the graphs themselves using web-based graph digitizer (raw data was not in report); A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorCB_plot3.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorCB_plot3.1of3_8mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot3=siteRB, 3.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2023",8,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,N,N,Data from site RB was not reported ,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorKB_plot3.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorKB_plot3.1of3_8mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot3=siteRB, 3.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2024",8,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,N,N,Data from site RB was not reported ,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorPSP_plot3.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorPSP_plot3.1of3_8mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot3=siteRB, 3.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2025",8,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,N,N,Data from site RB was not reported ,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorCB_plot1.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorCB_plot1.2of3_8mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2026",8,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,NA,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,"no TERFS deployed for donor bed CB; Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorKB_plot1.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorKB_plot1.2of3_8mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2027",8,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,ND,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,"Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorPSP_plot1.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorPSP_plot1.2of3_8mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2028",8,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,ND,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,"Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorCB_plot2.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorCB_plot2.2of3_8mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2029",8,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,NA,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,"no TERFS deployed for donor bed CB; Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorKB_plot2.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorKB_plot2.2of3_8mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2030",8,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,ND,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,"Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorPSP_plot2.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorPSP_plot2.2of3_8mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2031",8,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,ND,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,"Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorCB_plot3.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorCB_plot3.2of3_8mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot3=siteRB, 3.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2032",8,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,NA,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,"no TERFS deployed for donor bed CB; Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorKB_plot3.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorKB_plot3.2of3_8mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot3=siteRB, 3.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2033",8,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,ND,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,"Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorPSP_plot3.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorPSP_plot3.2of3_8mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot3=siteRB, 3.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2034",8,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,ND,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,"Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorCB_plot1.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorCB_plot1.1of3_9mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2017",9,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,2,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Column BF, unsure what ""patch"" size is, need to check with Kathy, also this data was extracted from the graphs themselves using web-based graph digitizer (raw data was not in report); A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorKB_plot1.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorKB_plot1.1of3_9mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2018",9,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,38,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Column BF, unsure what ""patch"" size is, need to check with Kathy, also this data was extracted from the graphs themselves using web-based graph digitizer (raw data was not in report); A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorPSP_plot1.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorPSP_plot1.1of3_9mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2019",9,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,45,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Column BF, unsure what ""patch"" size is, need to check with Kathy, also this data was extracted from the graphs themselves using web-based graph digitizer (raw data was not in report); A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorCB_plot2.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorCB_plot2.1of3_9mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2020",9,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Column BF, unsure what ""patch"" size is, need to check with Kathy, also this data was extracted from the graphs themselves using web-based graph digitizer (raw data was not in report); A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorKB_plot2.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorKB_plot2.1of3_9mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2021",9,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Column BF, unsure what ""patch"" size is, need to check with Kathy, also this data was extracted from the graphs themselves using web-based graph digitizer (raw data was not in report); A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorPSP_plot2.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorPSP_plot2.1of3_9mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2022",9,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,21,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Column BF, unsure what ""patch"" size is, need to check with Kathy, also this data was extracted from the graphs themselves using web-based graph digitizer (raw data was not in report); A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorCB_plot3.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorCB_plot3.1of3_9mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot3=siteRB, 3.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2023",9,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,Data from site RB was not reported ,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorKB_plot3.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorKB_plot3.1of3_9mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot3=siteRB, 3.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2024",9,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,Data from site RB was not reported ,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorPSP_plot3.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorPSP_plot3.1of3_9mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot3=siteRB, 3.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2025",9,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,Data from site RB was not reported ,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorCB_plot1.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorCB_plot1.2of3_9mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2026",9,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,NA,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,"no TERFS deployed for donor bed CB; Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorKB_plot1.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorKB_plot1.2of3_9mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2027",9,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,ND,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,"Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorPSP_plot1.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorPSP_plot1.2of3_9mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2028",9,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,ND,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,"Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorCB_plot2.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorCB_plot2.2of3_9mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2029",9,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,NA,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,"no TERFS deployed for donor bed CB; Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorKB_plot2.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorKB_plot2.2of3_9mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2030",9,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,ND,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,"Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorPSP_plot2.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorPSP_plot2.2of3_9mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2031",9,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,ND,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,"Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorCB_plot3.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorCB_plot3.2of3_9mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot3=siteRB, 3.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2032",9,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,NA,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,"no TERFS deployed for donor bed CB; Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorKB_plot3.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorKB_plot3.2of3_9mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot3=siteRB, 3.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2033",9,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,ND,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,"Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorPSP_plot3.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorPSP_plot3.2of3_9mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot3=siteRB, 3.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2034",9,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,ND,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,"Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorCB_plot1.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorCB_plot1.1of3_10mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2017",10,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,19,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Column BF, unsure what ""patch"" size is, need to check with Kathy, also this data was extracted from the graphs themselves using web-based graph digitizer (raw data was not in report); A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorKB_plot1.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorKB_plot1.1of3_10mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2018",10,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,81,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Column BF, unsure what ""patch"" size is, need to check with Kathy, also this data was extracted from the graphs themselves using web-based graph digitizer (raw data was not in report); A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorPSP_plot1.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorPSP_plot1.1of3_10mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2019",10,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,96,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Column BF, unsure what ""patch"" size is, need to check with Kathy, also this data was extracted from the graphs themselves using web-based graph digitizer (raw data was not in report); A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorCB_plot2.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorCB_plot2.1of3_10mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2020",10,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,12,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Column BF, unsure what ""patch"" size is, need to check with Kathy, also this data was extracted from the graphs themselves using web-based graph digitizer (raw data was not in report); A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorKB_plot2.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorKB_plot2.1of3_10mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2021",10,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,27,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Column BF, unsure what ""patch"" size is, need to check with Kathy, also this data was extracted from the graphs themselves using web-based graph digitizer (raw data was not in report); A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorPSP_plot2.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorPSP_plot2.1of3_10mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2022",10,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,34,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Column BF, unsure what ""patch"" size is, need to check with Kathy, also this data was extracted from the graphs themselves using web-based graph digitizer (raw data was not in report); A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorCB_plot3.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorCB_plot3.1of3_10mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot3=siteRB, 3.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2023",10,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,Data from site RB was not reported ,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorKB_plot3.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorKB_plot3.1of3_10mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot3=siteRB, 3.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2024",10,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,Data from site RB was not reported ,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorPSP_plot3.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorPSP_plot3.1of3_10mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot3=siteRB, 3.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2025",10,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,Data from site RB was not reported ,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorCB_plot1.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorCB_plot1.2of3_10mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2026",10,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,60,NA,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,"no TERFS deployed for donor bed CB; Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorKB_plot1.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorKB_plot1.2of3_10mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2027",10,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,60,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,"Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorPSP_plot1.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorPSP_plot1.2of3_10mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2028",10,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,60,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,"Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorCB_plot2.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorCB_plot2.2of3_10mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2029",10,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,60,NA,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,"no TERFS deployed for donor bed CB; Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorKB_plot2.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorKB_plot2.2of3_10mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2030",10,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,60,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,"Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorPSP_plot2.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorPSP_plot2.2of3_10mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2031",10,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,60,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,"Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorCB_plot3.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorCB_plot3.2of3_10mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot3=siteRB, 3.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2032",10,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,60,NA,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,"no TERFS deployed for donor bed CB; Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorKB_plot3.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorKB_plot3.2of3_10mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot3=siteRB, 3.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2033",10,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,60,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,"Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorPSP_plot3.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorPSP_plot3.2of3_10mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot3=siteRB, 3.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2034",10,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,60,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,"Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorCB_plot1.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorCB_plot1.1of3_12mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2017",12,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,67,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Column BF, unsure what ""patch"" size is, need to check with Kathy, also this data was extracted from the graphs themselves using web-based graph digitizer (raw data was not in report); A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorKB_plot1.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorKB_plot1.1of3_12mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2018",12,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,306,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Column BF, unsure what ""patch"" size is, need to check with Kathy, also this data was extracted from the graphs themselves using web-based graph digitizer (raw data was not in report); A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorPSP_plot1.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorPSP_plot1.1of3_12mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2019",12,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,224,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Column BF, unsure what ""patch"" size is, need to check with Kathy, also this data was extracted from the graphs themselves using web-based graph digitizer (raw data was not in report); A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorCB_plot2.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorCB_plot2.1of3_12mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2020",12,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,18,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Column BF, unsure what ""patch"" size is, need to check with Kathy, also this data was extracted from the graphs themselves using web-based graph digitizer (raw data was not in report); A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorKB_plot2.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorKB_plot2.1of3_12mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2021",12,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,56,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Column BF, unsure what ""patch"" size is, need to check with Kathy, also this data was extracted from the graphs themselves using web-based graph digitizer (raw data was not in report); A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorPSP_plot2.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorPSP_plot2.1of3_12mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2022",12,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,94,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Column BF, unsure what ""patch"" size is, need to check with Kathy, also this data was extracted from the graphs themselves using web-based graph digitizer (raw data was not in report); A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorCB_plot3.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorCB_plot3.1of3_12mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot3=siteRB, 3.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2023",12,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,Data from site RB was not reported ,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorKB_plot3.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorKB_plot3.1of3_12mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot3=siteRB, 3.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2024",12,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,Data from site RB was not reported ,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorPSP_plot3.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorPSP_plot3.1of3_12mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot3=siteRB, 3.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2025",12,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,Data from site RB was not reported ,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorCB_plot1.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorCB_plot1.2of3_12mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2026",12,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,60,NA,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,"no TERFS deployed for donor bed CB; Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorKB_plot1.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorKB_plot1.2of3_12mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2027",12,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,60,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,"Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorPSP_plot1.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorPSP_plot1.2of3_12mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2028",12,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,60,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,"Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorCB_plot2.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorCB_plot2.2of3_12mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2029",12,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,60,NA,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,"no TERFS deployed for donor bed CB; Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorKB_plot2.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorKB_plot2.2of3_12mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2030",12,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,60,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,"Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorPSP_plot2.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorPSP_plot2.2of3_12mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2031",12,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,60,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,"Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorCB_plot3.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorCB_plot3.2of3_12mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot3=siteRB, 3.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2032",12,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,60,NA,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,"no TERFS deployed for donor bed CB; Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorKB_plot3.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorKB_plot3.2of3_12mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot3=siteRB, 3.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2033",12,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,60,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,"Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorPSP_plot3.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorPSP_plot3.2of3_12mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot3=siteRB, 3.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2034",12,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,60,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,"Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorCB_plot1.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorCB_plot1.1of3_14mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2017",14,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,48,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Column BF, unsure what ""patch"" size is, need to check with Kathy, also this data was extracted from the graphs themselves using web-based graph digitizer (raw data was not in report); A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorKB_plot1.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorKB_plot1.1of3_14mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2018",14,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,187,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Column BF, unsure what ""patch"" size is, need to check with Kathy, also this data was extracted from the graphs themselves using web-based graph digitizer (raw data was not in report); A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorPSP_plot1.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorPSP_plot1.1of3_14mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2019",14,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,217,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Column BF, unsure what ""patch"" size is, need to check with Kathy, also this data was extracted from the graphs themselves using web-based graph digitizer (raw data was not in report); A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorCB_plot2.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorCB_plot2.1of3_14mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2020",14,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,21,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Column BF, unsure what ""patch"" size is, need to check with Kathy, also this data was extracted from the graphs themselves using web-based graph digitizer (raw data was not in report); A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorKB_plot2.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorKB_plot2.1of3_14mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2021",14,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,43,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Column BF, unsure what ""patch"" size is, need to check with Kathy, also this data was extracted from the graphs themselves using web-based graph digitizer (raw data was not in report); A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorPSP_plot2.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorPSP_plot2.1of3_14mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2022",14,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,76,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Column BF, unsure what ""patch"" size is, need to check with Kathy, also this data was extracted from the graphs themselves using web-based graph digitizer (raw data was not in report); A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorCB_plot3.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorCB_plot3.1of3_14mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot3=siteRB, 3.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2023",14,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,Data from site RB was not reported ,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorKB_plot3.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorKB_plot3.1of3_14mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot3=siteRB, 3.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2024",14,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,Data from site RB was not reported ,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorPSP_plot3.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorPSP_plot3.1of3_14mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot3=siteRB, 3.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2025",14,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,Data from site RB was not reported ,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorCB_plot1.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorCB_plot1.2of3_14mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2026",14,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,60,NA,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,"no TERFS deployed for donor bed CB; Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorKB_plot1.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorKB_plot1.2of3_14mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2027",14,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,60,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,"Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorPSP_plot1.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorPSP_plot1.2of3_14mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2028",14,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,60,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,"Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorCB_plot2.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorCB_plot2.2of3_14mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2029",14,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,60,NA,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,"no TERFS deployed for donor bed CB; Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorKB_plot2.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorKB_plot2.2of3_14mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2030",14,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,60,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,"Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorPSP_plot2.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorPSP_plot2.2of3_14mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2031",14,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,60,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,"Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorCB_plot3.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorCB_plot3.2of3_14mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot3=siteRB, 3.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2032",14,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,60,NA,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,"no TERFS deployed for donor bed CB; Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorKB_plot3.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorKB_plot3.2of3_14mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot3=siteRB, 3.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2033",14,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,60,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,"Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorPSP_plot3.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorPSP_plot3.2of3_14mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot3=siteRB, 3.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2034",14,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,60,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,"Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorCB_plot1.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorCB_plot1.1of3_19mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2017",19,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,65,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Column BF, unsure what ""patch"" size is, need to check with Kathy, also this data was extracted from the graphs themselves using web-based graph digitizer (raw data was not in report); A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorKB_plot1.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorKB_plot1.1of3_19mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2018",19,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,289,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Column BF, unsure what ""patch"" size is, need to check with Kathy, also this data was extracted from the graphs themselves using web-based graph digitizer (raw data was not in report); A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorPSP_plot1.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorPSP_plot1.1of3_19mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2019",19,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,291,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Column BF, unsure what ""patch"" size is, need to check with Kathy, also this data was extracted from the graphs themselves using web-based graph digitizer (raw data was not in report); A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorCB_plot2.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorCB_plot2.1of3_19mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2020",19,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,47,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Column BF, unsure what ""patch"" size is, need to check with Kathy, also this data was extracted from the graphs themselves using web-based graph digitizer (raw data was not in report); A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorKB_plot2.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorKB_plot2.1of3_19mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2021",19,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,110,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Column BF, unsure what ""patch"" size is, need to check with Kathy, also this data was extracted from the graphs themselves using web-based graph digitizer (raw data was not in report); A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorPSP_plot2.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorPSP_plot2.1of3_19mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2022",19,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,230,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Column BF, unsure what ""patch"" size is, need to check with Kathy, also this data was extracted from the graphs themselves using web-based graph digitizer (raw data was not in report); A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorCB_plot3.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorCB_plot3.1of3_19mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot3=siteRB, 3.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2023",19,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,Data from site RB was not reported ,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorKB_plot3.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorKB_plot3.1of3_19mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot3=siteRB, 3.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2024",19,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,Data from site RB was not reported ,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorPSP_plot3.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorPSP_plot3.1of3_19mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot3=siteRB, 3.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2025",19,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,Data from site RB was not reported ,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorCB_plot1.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorCB_plot1.2of3_19mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2026",19,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,60,NA,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,"no TERFS deployed for donor bed CB; Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorKB_plot1.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorKB_plot1.2of3_19mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2027",19,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,60,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,"Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorPSP_plot1.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorPSP_plot1.2of3_19mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2028",19,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,60,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,"Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorCB_plot2.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorCB_plot2.2of3_19mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2029",19,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,60,NA,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,"no TERFS deployed for donor bed CB; Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorKB_plot2.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorKB_plot2.2of3_19mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2030",19,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,60,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,"Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorPSP_plot2.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorPSP_plot2.2of3_19mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2031",19,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,60,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,"Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorCB_plot3.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorCB_plot3.2of3_19mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot3=siteRB, 3.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2032",19,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,60,NA,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,"no TERFS deployed for donor bed CB; Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorKB_plot3.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorKB_plot3.2of3_19mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot3=siteRB, 3.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2033",19,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,60,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,"Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorPSP_plot3.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorPSP_plot3.2of3_19mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot3=siteRB, 3.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2034",19,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,60,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,"Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorCB_plot1.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorCB_plot1.1of3_20mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2017",20,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,122,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Column BF, unsure what ""patch"" size is, need to check with Kathy, also this data was extracted from the graphs themselves using web-based graph digitizer (raw data was not in report); A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorKB_plot1.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorKB_plot1.1of3_20mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2018",20,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,643,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Column BF, unsure what ""patch"" size is, need to check with Kathy, also this data was extracted from the graphs themselves using web-based graph digitizer (raw data was not in report); A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorPSP_plot1.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorPSP_plot1.1of3_20mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2019",20,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,402,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Column BF, unsure what ""patch"" size is, need to check with Kathy, also this data was extracted from the graphs themselves using web-based graph digitizer (raw data was not in report); A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorCB_plot2.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorCB_plot2.1of3_20mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2020",20,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,34,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Column BF, unsure what ""patch"" size is, need to check with Kathy, also this data was extracted from the graphs themselves using web-based graph digitizer (raw data was not in report); A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorKB_plot2.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorKB_plot2.1of3_20mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2021",20,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,199,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Column BF, unsure what ""patch"" size is, need to check with Kathy, also this data was extracted from the graphs themselves using web-based graph digitizer (raw data was not in report); A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorPSP_plot2.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorPSP_plot2.1of3_20mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2022",20,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,339,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Column BF, unsure what ""patch"" size is, need to check with Kathy, also this data was extracted from the graphs themselves using web-based graph digitizer (raw data was not in report); A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorCB_plot3.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorCB_plot3.1of3_20mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot3=siteRB, 3.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2023",20,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,Data from site RB was not reported ,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorKB_plot3.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorKB_plot3.1of3_20mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot3=siteRB, 3.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2024",20,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,Data from site RB was not reported ,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorPSP_plot3.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorPSP_plot3.1of3_20mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot3=siteRB, 3.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2025",20,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,Data from site RB was not reported ,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorCB_plot1.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorCB_plot1.2of3_20mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2026",20,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,60,NA,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,"no TERFS deployed for donor bed CB; Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorKB_plot1.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorKB_plot1.2of3_20mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2027",20,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,60,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,"Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorPSP_plot1.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorPSP_plot1.2of3_20mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2028",20,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,60,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,"Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorCB_plot2.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorCB_plot2.2of3_20mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2029",20,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,60,NA,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,"no TERFS deployed for donor bed CB; Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorKB_plot2.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorKB_plot2.2of3_20mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2030",20,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,60,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,"Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorPSP_plot2.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorPSP_plot2.2of3_20mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2031",20,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,60,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,"Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorCB_plot3.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorCB_plot3.2of3_20mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot3=siteRB, 3.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2032",20,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,60,NA,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,"no TERFS deployed for donor bed CB; Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorKB_plot3.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorKB_plot3.2of3_20mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot3=siteRB, 3.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2033",20,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,60,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,"Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorPSP_plot3.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorPSP_plot3.2of3_20mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot3=siteRB, 3.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2034",20,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,60,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,"Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorCB_plot1.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorCB_plot1.1of3_21mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2017",21,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,154,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Column BF, unsure what ""patch"" size is, need to check with Kathy, also this data was extracted from the graphs themselves using web-based graph digitizer (raw data was not in report); A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorKB_plot1.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorKB_plot1.1of3_21mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2018",21,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,927,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Column BF, unsure what ""patch"" size is, need to check with Kathy, also this data was extracted from the graphs themselves using web-based graph digitizer (raw data was not in report); A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorPSP_plot1.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorPSP_plot1.1of3_21mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2019",21,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,540,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Column BF, unsure what ""patch"" size is, need to check with Kathy, also this data was extracted from the graphs themselves using web-based graph digitizer (raw data was not in report); A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorCB_plot2.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorCB_plot2.1of3_21mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2020",21,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,39,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Column BF, unsure what ""patch"" size is, need to check with Kathy, also this data was extracted from the graphs themselves using web-based graph digitizer (raw data was not in report); A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorKB_plot2.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorKB_plot2.1of3_21mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2021",21,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,276,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Column BF, unsure what ""patch"" size is, need to check with Kathy, also this data was extracted from the graphs themselves using web-based graph digitizer (raw data was not in report); A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorPSP_plot2.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorPSP_plot2.1of3_21mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2022",21,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,597,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Column BF, unsure what ""patch"" size is, need to check with Kathy, also this data was extracted from the graphs themselves using web-based graph digitizer (raw data was not in report); A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorCB_plot3.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorCB_plot3.1of3_21mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot3=siteRB, 3.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2023",21,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,Data from site RB was not reported ,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorKB_plot3.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorKB_plot3.1of3_21mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot3=siteRB, 3.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2024",21,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,Data from site RB was not reported ,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorPSP_plot3.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorPSP_plot3.1of3_21mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot3=siteRB, 3.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2025",21,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,Data from site RB was not reported ,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorCB_plot1.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorCB_plot1.2of3_21mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2026",21,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,60,NA,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,"no TERFS deployed for donor bed CB; Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorKB_plot1.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorKB_plot1.2of3_21mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2027",21,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,60,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,"Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorPSP_plot1.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorPSP_plot1.2of3_21mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2028",21,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,60,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,"Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorCB_plot2.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorCB_plot2.2of3_21mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2029",21,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,60,NA,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,"no TERFS deployed for donor bed CB; Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorKB_plot2.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorKB_plot2.2of3_21mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2030",21,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,60,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,"Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorPSP_plot2.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorPSP_plot2.2of3_21mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2031",21,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,60,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,"Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorCB_plot3.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorCB_plot3.2of3_21mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot3=siteRB, 3.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2032",21,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,60,NA,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,"no TERFS deployed for donor bed CB; Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorKB_plot3.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorKB_plot3.2of3_21mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot3=siteRB, 3.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2033",21,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,60,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,"Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorPSP_plot3.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorPSP_plot3.2of3_21mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot3=siteRB, 3.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2034",21,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,60,ND,ND,NA,ND,ND,ND,"Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorCB_plot1.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorCB_plot1.1of3_22mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2017",22,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,303,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Column BF, unsure what ""patch"" size is, need to check with Kathy, also this data was extracted from the graphs themselves using web-based graph digitizer (raw data was not in report); A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorKB_plot1.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorKB_plot1.1of3_22mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2018",22,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,1074,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Column BF, unsure what ""patch"" size is, need to check with Kathy, also this data was extracted from the graphs themselves using web-based graph digitizer (raw data was not in report); A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorPSP_plot1.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorPSP_plot1.1of3_22mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2019",22,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,742,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Column BF, unsure what ""patch"" size is, need to check with Kathy, also this data was extracted from the graphs themselves using web-based graph digitizer (raw data was not in report); A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorCB_plot2.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorCB_plot2.1of3_22mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2020",22,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,63,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Column BF, unsure what ""patch"" size is, need to check with Kathy, also this data was extracted from the graphs themselves using web-based graph digitizer (raw data was not in report); A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorKB_plot2.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorKB_plot2.1of3_22mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2021",22,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,419,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Column BF, unsure what ""patch"" size is, need to check with Kathy, also this data was extracted from the graphs themselves using web-based graph digitizer (raw data was not in report); A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorPSP_plot2.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorPSP_plot2.1of3_22mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2022",22,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,766,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Column BF, unsure what ""patch"" size is, need to check with Kathy, also this data was extracted from the graphs themselves using web-based graph digitizer (raw data was not in report); A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorCB_plot3.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorCB_plot3.1of3_22mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot3=siteRB, 3.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2023",22,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,N,N,Data from site RB was not reported ,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorKB_plot3.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorKB_plot3.1of3_22mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot3=siteRB, 3.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2024",22,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,N,N,Data from site RB was not reported ,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorPSP_plot3.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorPSP_plot3.1of3_22mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot3=siteRB, 3.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2025",22,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,N,N,Data from site RB was not reported ,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorCB_plot1.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorCB_plot1.2of3_22mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2026",22,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,ND,NA,ND,NA,ND,NA,NA,"no TERFS deployed for donor bed CB; Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorKB_plot1.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorKB_plot1.2of3_22mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2027",22,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,ND,ND,ND,NA,ND,N,N,"Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorPSP_plot1.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorPSP_plot1.2of3_22mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2028",22,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,ND,ND,ND,NA,ND,N,N,"Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorCB_plot2.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorCB_plot2.2of3_22mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2029",22,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,ND,NA,ND,NA,ND,NA,NA,"no TERFS deployed for donor bed CB; Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorKB_plot2.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorKB_plot2.2of3_22mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2030",22,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,ND,ND,ND,NA,ND,N,N,"Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorPSP_plot2.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorPSP_plot2.2of3_22mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2031",22,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,ND,ND,ND,NA,ND,N,N,"Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorCB_plot3.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorCB_plot3.2of3_22mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot3=siteRB, 3.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2032",22,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,ND,NA,ND,NA,ND,NA,NA,"no TERFS deployed for donor bed CB; Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorKB_plot3.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorKB_plot3.2of3_22mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot3=siteRB, 3.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2033",22,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,ND,ND,ND,NA,ND,N,N,"Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorPSP_plot3.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorPSP_plot3.2of3_22mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot3=siteRB, 3.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2034",22,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,ND,ND,ND,NA,ND,N,N,"Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorCB_plot1.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorCB_plot1.1of3_23mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2017",23,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,146,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Column BF, unsure what ""patch"" size is, need to check with Kathy, also this data was extracted from the graphs themselves using web-based graph digitizer (raw data was not in report); A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods; Canopy height data grabbed from figures and is the MAX canopy height (cm), initial canopy height is written as ""0 cm"" because this was by seeding not transplants so they started with nothing",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorKB_plot1.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorKB_plot1.1of3_23mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2018",23,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,528,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Column BF, unsure what ""patch"" size is, need to check with Kathy, also this data was extracted from the graphs themselves using web-based graph digitizer (raw data was not in report); A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods; Canopy height data grabbed from figures and is the MAX canopy height (cm), initial canopy height is written as ""0 cm"" because this was by seeding not transplants so they started with nothing",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorPSP_plot1.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorPSP_plot1.1of3_23mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2019",23,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,836,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Column BF, unsure what ""patch"" size is, need to check with Kathy, also this data was extracted from the graphs themselves using web-based graph digitizer (raw data was not in report); A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods; Canopy height data grabbed from figures and is the MAX canopy height (cm), initial canopy height is written as ""0 cm"" because this was by seeding not transplants so they started with nothing",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorCB_plot2.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorCB_plot2.1of3_23mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2020",23,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,103,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Column BF, unsure what ""patch"" size is, need to check with Kathy, also this data was extracted from the graphs themselves using web-based graph digitizer (raw data was not in report); A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods; Canopy height data grabbed from figures and is the MAX canopy height (cm), initial canopy height is written as ""0 cm"" because this was by seeding not transplants so they started with nothing",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorKB_plot2.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorKB_plot2.1of3_23mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2021",23,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,528,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Column BF, unsure what ""patch"" size is, need to check with Kathy, also this data was extracted from the graphs themselves using web-based graph digitizer (raw data was not in report); A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods; Canopy height data grabbed from figures and is the MAX canopy height (cm), initial canopy height is written as ""0 cm"" because this was by seeding not transplants so they started with nothing",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorPSP_plot2.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorPSP_plot2.1of3_23mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2022",23,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,975,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,Y,Y,"Column BF, unsure what ""patch"" size is, need to check with Kathy, also this data was extracted from the graphs themselves using web-based graph digitizer (raw data was not in report); A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods; Canopy height data grabbed from figures and is the MAX canopy height (cm), initial canopy height is written as ""0 cm"" because this was by seeding not transplants so they started with nothing",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorCB_plot3.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorCB_plot3.1of3_23mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot3=siteRB, 3.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2023",23,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,N,N,Data from site RB was not reported; BuDS failed at site RB,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorKB_plot3.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorKB_plot3.1of3_23mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot3=siteRB, 3.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2024",23,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,N,N,Data from site RB was not reported; BuDS failed at site RB,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorPSP_plot3.1of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorPSP_plot3.1of3_23mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Buoy-deployed seeding method or BuDS,"plot3=siteRB, 3.1 signifies BuDS "".1""=BuDS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2025",23,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,N,N,Data from site RB was not reported; BuDS failed at site RB,N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorCB_plot1.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorCB_plot1.2of3_23mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2026",23,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,ND,NA,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,NA,NA,"no TERFS deployed for donor bed CB; Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorKB_plot1.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorKB_plot1.2of3_23mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2027",23,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,ND,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,N,N,"Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods; Restpration success--stated as very limited success, of 18 plots only 5 had shoots in them and though they persisted it wasn't considered hugely successful (also, we don't know WHICH of these plots succeeded)",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorPSP_plot1.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMRGC_DonorPSP_plot1.2of3_23mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MRGC (Marin Rod and Gun Club),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot1=siteMRGC, 1.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2028",23,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,ND,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,N,N,"Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods; Restpration success--stated as very limited success, of 18 plots only 5 had shoots in them and though they persisted it wasn't considered hugely successful (also, we don't know WHICH of these plots succeeded)",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorCB_plot2.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorCB_plot2.2of3_23mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2029",23,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,ND,NA,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,NA,NA,"no TERFS deployed for donor bed CB; Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorKB_plot2.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorKB_plot2.2of3_23mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2030",23,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,ND,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,N,N,"Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods; Restpration success--stated as very limited success, of 18 plots only 5 had shoots in them and though they persisted it wasn't considered hugely successful (also, we don't know WHICH of these plots succeeded)",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorPSP_plot2.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteMCDS_DonorPSP_plot2.2of3_23mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,MCDS (Marin Country Day School),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot2=siteMCDS, 2.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2031",23,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,ND,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,N,N,"Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods; Restpration success--stated as very limited success, of 18 plots only 5 had shoots in them and though they persisted it wasn't considered hugely successful (also, we don't know WHICH of these plots succeeded)",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorCB_plot3.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorCB_plot3.2of3_23mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot3=siteRB, 3.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Crown Beach (CB): in northeastern region of the South Bay, mainly made up of annual seagrasses, accessible site, clonal diversity was 100% when measured in 2003",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2032",23,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,ND,NA,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,NA,NA,"no TERFS deployed for donor bed CB; Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorKB_plot3.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorKB_plot3.2of3_23mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot3=siteRB, 3.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2033",23,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,ND,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,N,N,"Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods; Restpration success--stated as very limited success, of 18 plots only 5 had shoots in them and though they persisted it wasn't considered hugely successful (also, we don't know WHICH of these plots succeeded)",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFB_CICEET,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorPSP_plot3.2of3,SFB_CICEET_SiteRB_DonorPSP_plot3.2of3_23mo,NA,Cooperative Institute for Coastal and Estuarine Environmental Technology,San Francisco,RC (Richardson Bay Audobon Sanctuary),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,TERF,Modified TERF using Vexar instead of metal frames,"plot3=siteRB, 3.2 signifies TERFS "".2""=TERFS",N,"Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay, largely perennial, low levels of clonal diversity, lowest of 6 beds tested for allelic diversity and heterozygosity",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"No eelgrass present, donor bed are not described in detail beyond what is written in column AG",2006,August,Summer,2,"After 7 month mark, monitored monthly from March-October 2007 and then again monthly from March-July 2034",23,NA,-2.3,Within range of where eelgrass naturally occurs elsewhere in the Bay,ND,ND,ND,3,ND,60,ND,ND,ND,NA,Genetically diverse eelgrass patches that persist throughout the study period,N,N,"Column BF: these shoot densities are per ""patch"" but it's difficult to determine what the ""patch"" area is so need to ask Kathy; A large focus of this study was to look at genetic diversity, they ran multiple studies on the donor bed genetics and the genetics of restored habitats from the different methods; Restpration success--stated as very limited success, of 18 plots only 5 had shoots in them and though they persisted it wasn't considered hugely successful (also, we don't know WHICH of these plots succeeded)",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,"Y, PAR",Deployed YSI Instruments with PAR sensors at each of the sites in Spring 2007,ND,"Y, noted Bay Pipefish and other fish larvae in restored plots",Bay piptefish,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot1of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot1of28_11mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration,2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2011, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",11,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2011) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot2of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot2of28_11mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration,2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2011, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",11,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2011) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot3of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot3of28_11mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration,2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2011, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",11,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2011) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot4of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot4of28_11mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration,2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2011, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",11,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2011) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot5of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot5of28_11mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration,2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2011, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",11,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2011) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot6of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot6of28_11mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration,2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2011, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",11,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2011) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot7of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot7of28_11mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration,2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2011, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",11,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2011) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot8of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot8of28_11mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration,2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2011, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",11,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2011) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot9of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot9of28_11mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration,2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2011, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",11,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2011) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot10of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot10of28_11mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration,2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2011, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",11,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2011) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot11of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot11of28_11mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration,2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2011, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",11,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2011) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot12of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot12of28_11mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration,2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2011, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",11,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2011) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot13of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot13of28_11mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration,2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2011, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",11,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2011) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot14of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot14of28_11mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration,2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2011, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",11,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2011) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot15of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot15of28_11mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration,2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2011, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",11,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2011) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot16of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot16of28_11mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration,2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2011, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",11,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2011) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot17of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot17of28_11mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration,2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2011, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",11,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2011) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot18of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot18of28_11mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration,2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2011, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",11,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2011) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot19of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot19of28_11mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration,2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2011, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",11,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2011) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot20of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot20of28_11mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration,2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2011, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",11,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2011) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot21of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot21of28_11mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration,2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2011, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",11,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2011) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot22of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot22of28_11mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration,2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2011, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",11,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2011) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot23of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot23of28_11mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration,2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2011, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",11,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2011) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot24of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot24of28_11mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration,2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2011, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",11,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2011) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot25of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot25of28_11mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration,2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2011, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",11,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2011) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot26of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot26of28_11mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration,2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2011, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",11,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2011) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot27of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot27of28_11mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration,2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2011, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",11,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2011) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot28of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot28of28_11mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration,2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2011, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",11,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2011) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot1of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot1of28_22mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration,2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2022, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",22,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2022) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot2of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot2of28_22mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration,2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2022, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",22,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2022) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot3of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot3of28_22mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration,2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2022, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",22,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2022) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot4of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot4of28_22mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration,2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2022, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",22,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2022) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot5of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot5of28_22mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration,2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2022, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",22,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2022) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot6of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot6of28_22mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration,2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2022, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",22,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2022) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot7of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot7of28_22mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration,2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2022, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",22,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2022) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot8of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot8of28_22mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration,2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2022, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",22,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2022) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot9of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot9of28_22mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration,2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2022, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",22,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2022) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot10of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot10of28_22mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration,2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2022, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",22,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2022) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot11of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot11of28_22mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration,2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2022, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",22,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2022) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot12of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot12of28_22mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration,2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2022, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",22,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2022) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot13of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot13of28_22mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration,2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2022, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",22,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2022) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot14of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot14of28_22mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration,2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2022, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",22,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2022) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot15of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot15of28_22mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration,2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2022, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",22,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2022) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot16of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot16of28_22mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration,2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2022, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",22,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2022) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot17of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot17of28_22mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration,2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2022, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",22,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2022) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot18of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot18of28_22mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration,2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2022, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",22,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2022) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot19of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot19of28_22mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration,2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2022, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",22,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2022) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot20of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot20of28_22mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration,2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2022, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",22,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2022) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot21of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot21of28_22mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration,2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2022, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",22,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2022) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot22of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot22of28_22mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration,2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2022, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",22,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2022) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot23of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot23of28_22mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration,2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2022, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",22,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2022) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot24of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot24of28_22mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration,2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2022, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",22,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2022) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot25of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot25of28_22mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration,2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2022, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",22,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2022) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot26of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot26of28_22mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration,2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2022, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",22,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2022) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot27of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot27of28_22mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Areas where eelgrass was naturally in 2010 began to ""pop"" back up; Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration",2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2022, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",22,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2022) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0.25,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot28of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot28of28_22mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Areas where eelgrass was naturally in 2010 began to ""pop"" back up; Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration",2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2022, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",22,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2022) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0.25,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot1of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot1of28_32mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Areas where eelgrass was naturally in 2010 began to ""pop"" back up; Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration",2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2032, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",32,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2032) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0.25,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot2of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot2of28_32mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Areas where eelgrass was naturally in 2010 began to ""pop"" back up; Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration",2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2032, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",32,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2032) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,1,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot3of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot3of28_32mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Areas where eelgrass was naturally in 2010 began to ""pop"" back up; Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration",2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2032, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",32,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2032) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot4of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot4of28_32mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Areas where eelgrass was naturally in 2010 began to ""pop"" back up; Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration",2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2032, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",32,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2032) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot5of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot5of28_32mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Areas where eelgrass was naturally in 2010 began to ""pop"" back up; Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration",2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2032, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",32,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2032) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot6of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot6of28_32mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Areas where eelgrass was naturally in 2010 began to ""pop"" back up; Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration",2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2032, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",32,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2032) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot7of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot7of28_32mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Areas where eelgrass was naturally in 2010 began to ""pop"" back up; Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration",2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2032, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",32,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2032) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot8of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot8of28_32mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Areas where eelgrass was naturally in 2010 began to ""pop"" back up; Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration",2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2032, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",32,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2032) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot9of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot9of28_32mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Areas where eelgrass was naturally in 2010 began to ""pop"" back up; Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration",2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2032, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",32,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2032) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot10of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot10of28_32mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Areas where eelgrass was naturally in 2010 began to ""pop"" back up; Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration",2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2032, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",32,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2032) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot11of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot11of28_32mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Areas where eelgrass was naturally in 2010 began to ""pop"" back up; Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration",2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2032, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",32,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2032) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot12of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot12of28_32mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Areas where eelgrass was naturally in 2010 began to ""pop"" back up; Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration",2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2032, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",32,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2032) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot13of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot13of28_32mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Areas where eelgrass was naturally in 2010 began to ""pop"" back up; Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration",2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2032, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",32,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2032) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot14of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot14of28_32mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Areas where eelgrass was naturally in 2010 began to ""pop"" back up; Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration",2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2032, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",32,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2032) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot15of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot15of28_32mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Areas where eelgrass was naturally in 2010 began to ""pop"" back up; Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration",2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2032, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",32,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2032) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot16of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot16of28_32mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Areas where eelgrass was naturally in 2010 began to ""pop"" back up; Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration",2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2032, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",32,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2032) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot17of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot17of28_32mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Areas where eelgrass was naturally in 2010 began to ""pop"" back up; Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration",2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2032, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",32,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2032) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot18of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot18of28_32mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Areas where eelgrass was naturally in 2010 began to ""pop"" back up; Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration",2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2032, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",32,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2032) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot19of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot19of28_32mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Areas where eelgrass was naturally in 2010 began to ""pop"" back up; Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration",2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2032, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",32,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2032) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot20of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot20of28_32mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Areas where eelgrass was naturally in 2010 began to ""pop"" back up; Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration",2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2032, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",32,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2032) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot21of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot21of28_32mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Areas where eelgrass was naturally in 2010 began to ""pop"" back up; Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration",2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2032, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",32,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2032) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot22of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot22of28_32mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Areas where eelgrass was naturally in 2010 began to ""pop"" back up; Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration",2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2032, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",32,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2032) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot23of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot23of28_32mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Areas where eelgrass was naturally in 2010 began to ""pop"" back up; Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration",2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2032, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",32,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2032) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot24of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot24of28_32mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Areas where eelgrass was naturally in 2010 began to ""pop"" back up; Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration",2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2032, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",32,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2032) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot25of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot25of28_32mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Areas where eelgrass was naturally in 2010 began to ""pop"" back up; Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration",2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2032, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",32,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2032) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot26of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot26of28_32mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Areas where eelgrass was naturally in 2010 began to ""pop"" back up; Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration",2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2032, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",32,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2032) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot27of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot27of28_32mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Areas where eelgrass was naturally in 2010 began to ""pop"" back up; Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration",2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2032, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",32,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2032) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot28of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot28of28_32mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Areas where eelgrass was naturally in 2010 began to ""pop"" back up; Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration",2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2032, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",32,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2032) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot1of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot1of28_44mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Areas where eelgrass was naturally in 2010 began to ""pop"" back up; Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration",2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2044, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",44,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2044) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,1,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,Y,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot2of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot2of28_44mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Areas where eelgrass was naturally in 2010 began to ""pop"" back up; Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration",2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2044, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",44,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2044) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,2,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,Y,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot3of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot3of28_44mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Areas where eelgrass was naturally in 2010 began to ""pop"" back up; Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration",2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2044, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",44,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2044) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,1,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,Y,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot4of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot4of28_44mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Areas where eelgrass was naturally in 2010 began to ""pop"" back up; Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration",2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2044, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",44,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2044) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,1,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,Y,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot5of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot5of28_44mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Areas where eelgrass was naturally in 2010 began to ""pop"" back up; Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration",2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2044, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",44,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2044) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,4,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,Y,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot6of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot6of28_44mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Areas where eelgrass was naturally in 2010 began to ""pop"" back up; Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration",2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2044, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",44,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2044) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,9,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,Y,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot7of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot7of28_44mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Areas where eelgrass was naturally in 2010 began to ""pop"" back up; Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration",2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2044, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",44,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2044) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,16,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,Y,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot8of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot8of28_44mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Areas where eelgrass was naturally in 2010 began to ""pop"" back up; Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration",2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2044, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",44,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2044) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,Y,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot9of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot9of28_44mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Areas where eelgrass was naturally in 2010 began to ""pop"" back up; Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration",2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2044, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",44,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2044) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,Y,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot10of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot10of28_44mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Areas where eelgrass was naturally in 2010 began to ""pop"" back up; Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration",2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2044, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",44,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2044) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot11of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot11of28_44mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Areas where eelgrass was naturally in 2010 began to ""pop"" back up; Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration",2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2044, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",44,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2044) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot12of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot12of28_44mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Areas where eelgrass was naturally in 2010 began to ""pop"" back up; Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration",2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2044, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",44,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2044) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot13of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot13of28_44mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Areas where eelgrass was naturally in 2010 began to ""pop"" back up; Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration",2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2044, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",44,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2044) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot14of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot14of28_44mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Areas where eelgrass was naturally in 2010 began to ""pop"" back up; Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration",2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2044, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",44,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2044) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot15of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot15of28_44mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Areas where eelgrass was naturally in 2010 began to ""pop"" back up; Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration",2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2044, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",44,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2044) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot16of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot16of28_44mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Areas where eelgrass was naturally in 2010 began to ""pop"" back up; Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration",2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2044, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",44,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2044) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot17of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot17of28_44mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Areas where eelgrass was naturally in 2010 began to ""pop"" back up; Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration",2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2044, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",44,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2044) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot18of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot18of28_44mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Areas where eelgrass was naturally in 2010 began to ""pop"" back up; Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration",2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2044, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",44,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2044) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot19of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot19of28_44mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Areas where eelgrass was naturally in 2010 began to ""pop"" back up; Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration",2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2044, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",44,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2044) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot20of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot20of28_44mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Areas where eelgrass was naturally in 2010 began to ""pop"" back up; Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration",2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2044, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",44,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2044) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot21of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot21of28_44mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Areas where eelgrass was naturally in 2010 began to ""pop"" back up; Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration",2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2044, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",44,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2044) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot22of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot22of28_44mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Areas where eelgrass was naturally in 2010 began to ""pop"" back up; Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration",2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2044, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",44,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2044) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot23of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot23of28_44mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Areas where eelgrass was naturally in 2010 began to ""pop"" back up; Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration",2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2044, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",44,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2044) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot24of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot24of28_44mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Areas where eelgrass was naturally in 2010 began to ""pop"" back up; Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration",2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2044, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",44,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2044) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot25of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot25of28_44mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Areas where eelgrass was naturally in 2010 began to ""pop"" back up; Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration",2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2044, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",44,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2044) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot26of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot26of28_44mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Areas where eelgrass was naturally in 2010 began to ""pop"" back up; Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration",2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2044, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",44,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2044) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot27of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot27of28_44mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Areas where eelgrass was naturally in 2010 began to ""pop"" back up; Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration",2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2044, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",44,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2044) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot28of28,SF_CMA_Mititgation_Project_plot28of28_44mo,NA,California Maritime Academy; San Francisco State University Romberg Tiburon Center,San Francisco,Small boat basin for the California Maritime Academy,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,"Yes, but unexplored",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,NA,Y,"Used the area that had eelgrass but was expected to be affected by dredging as donor material (CMA), but this was not enough plant material so they also used Point San Pablo (PSP): in North Bay, largest northern most bed in SF Bay",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Areas where eelgrass was naturally in 2010 began to ""pop"" back up; Variable; the trends in the CMA reference bed tracked trends observed in the restoration",2010,July,Summer,4,"Semi annually, June 2044, June 2012, May 2013, May 2014",44,3,ND,"No data provided on depth, only mention is that during one of their monitoring dates (6/2044) the tide was -1.3 feet and this would have been low enough to see all of the plots from the surface ",ND,ND,1120,4,0,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio; plot persistence,N,NA,No plots/shoots were observed,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,NA,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Wright_Scuchart_Harbor_Co_IndudstrialYardDredging,Wright_Scuchart_Harbor_Co_IndudstrialYardDredging_1986,Wright_Scuchart_Harbor_Co_IndudstrialYardDredging_June1986,NA,Wright-Schuschart Harbor Company,Humboldt Bay,Eastern shoreline of Indian Island; both N and S of Samoa Bridge along intertidal mudflats,40.72,-124.24,N. Cal,ND,ND,Mitigation,Active,ND,Garden Staple,Used twist ties to tie shoots to metal landscape staples,"For the mitigation the dredging component of the construction project was going to possibly disturb 0.43 acres of eelgrass, so they mitigated for these impacts by planting 0.92 acres",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,1986,June,Summer,1,monthly,0,2.1,ND,Transplanted at several locations within intertidal mudflats along eastern shoreline of Island Island (N and S of Samoa Bridge),ND,ND,ND,372311,0,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meeting mitigation target,N,ND,"Mitigation Ratio was calculated by dividing the area restored for mitigation (0.92 acres) by the area of impact (0.43 acres) ~2.1--the actual ratio is not stated probably because this is before CEMP really took off?; Complete failure by July 1987, they don't specify what qualifies as ""complete failure"" in the report. Failure likely attributed to planting on too steep of slopes, at too high of elevations, high energy zones (lots of erosion, wind/wave wake), dessication, and partial smothering by ephemeral green algae (Enteromorpha spp.), also they state that the selected anchoring technique could have severed shoot/rhizome tissue under high current velocities or high wind-wave exposure",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Wright_Scuchart_Harbor_Co_IndudstrialYardDredging,Wright_Scuchart_Harbor_Co_IndudstrialYardDredging_1986,Wright_Scuchart_Harbor_Co_IndudstrialYardDredging_July1987,NA,Wright-Schuschart Harbor Company,Humboldt Bay,Eastern shoreline of Indian Island; both N and S of Samoa Bridge along intertidal mudflats,40.72,-124.24,N. Cal,ND,ND,Mitigation,Active,ND,Garden Staple,Used twist ties to tie shoots to metal landscape staples,"For the mitigation the dredging component of the construction project was going to possibly disturb 0.43 acres of eelgrass, so they mitigated for these impacts by planting 0.92 acres",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,1986,June,Summer,1,monthly,13,2.1,ND,Transplanted at several locations within intertidal mudflats along eastern shoreline of Island Island (N and S of Samoa Bridge),ND,ND,ND,372311,0,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meeting mitigation target,N,ND,"Mitigation Ratio was calculated by dividing the area restored for mitigation (0.92 acres) by the area of impact (0.43 acres) ~2.1--the actual ratio is not stated probably because this is before CEMP really took off?; Complete failure by July 1987, they don't specify what qualifies as ""complete failure"" in the report. Failure likely attributed to planting on too steep of slopes, at too high of elevations, high energy zones (lots of erosion, wind/wave wake), dessication, and partial smothering by ephemeral green algae (Enteromorpha spp.), also they state that the selected anchoring technique could have severed shoot/rhizome tissue under high current velocities or high wind-wave exposure",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
City_of_Eureka_DelNorteStreetPier,City_of_Eureka_DelNorteStreetPier_1991,City_of_Eureka_DelNorteStreetPier_1991,NA,City of Eureka,Humboldt Bay,"Eureka, Del Norte Street Pier",40.72,-124.24,N. Cal,ND,ND,Mitigation,Active,ND,None Reported,Method not listed,"Transplanting unit type is listed as ""none"" but it's part of a transplanting mitigation synthesis table so it's perhaps ""unanchored"", listing now as ""other""",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,1991,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,1011,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,ND,N,ND,"The size of the restoration is listed as <0.25 acres so I converted this to m2 and listed is as ""initial area restored""; also transplant technique is listed as ""none"" but it's under the table for Mitigation Transplants so perhaps this means unanchored?",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
PGE_HBP_Pipeline_Removal_Project,PGE_HBP_Pipeline_Removal_Project_2010,PGE_HBP_Pipeline_Removal_Project_2010,NA,PG&E,Humboldt Bay,"Removed decomissioned fuel oil pipeline and this disturbed 1.14 acres of eelgrass habitat, filled in 0.79 acres with sediment to restore elevation and then transplanted.",40.72,-124.24,N. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,ND,Plug,Restored elevation then transplanted plugs,Shallow area was where restoration was focused,ND,"""nearby donor bed"" was not the same as the impacted site ",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,ND,2010,March-May,Spring,5,annually,60,ND,ND,Transplanted at depth zone where eelgrass was previously on top of and around pipeline ,ND,ND,ND,3197,4168,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Restoring 1.14 acres of impacted/disturbed eelgrass habitat; fell short with only 1.03 acres restored,N,ND,fell short of restoring full 1.14 acres with only 1.03 acres restored,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
HSU_Aquatic_Center_Eureka_Waterfront_2010,HSU_Aquatic_Center_Eureka_Waterfront_2010,HSU_Aquatic_Center_Eureka_Waterfront_2010,NA,HSU Aquatic Center,Humboldt Bay,HSU Aquatic Center on the Eureka Waterfront,40.72,-124.24,N. Cal,ND,N,Mitigation,Passive,N,Passive,"Removed debris (failing wooden wharf, adjacent creosote-treated pilings, and a gangway). Also, they were worried about shading effects and positioned the new gangway in such a position to reduce shading impacts to eelgrass",Construction was anticipated to impact 8m2 of eelgrass,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,ND,2010,ND,ND,2,ND,24,ND,ND,impacted area included existing eelgrass beds and unvegetated mudflat so can assume depth was somewhat shallow where passive restoration took place,ND,ND,ND,8,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,meet eelgrass mitigation success criteria (not stated explicitly),Y,ND,Impacted area was 8m2 of eelgrass and removing structures exposed 84m2 of additional intertidal mudflat habitat which allowed eelgrass to expand at least to the 8m2 that was impacted,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2014,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_Corte_Madera_Bay_2014_Test_Plot_1_PM_Method2,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_Corte_Madera_Bay_2014_Test_Plot_1_PM_Method2_3mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Corte Madera Bay,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,Point Molate; used this bed as Donor to compare to Cosco Busan DARP plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Point Molate,2014,June,Summer,1,semi-annually,3,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,225,150,ND,3,ND,ND,ND,NA,Test plot persistence,N,N,"part of incremental/adaptive restoration plan, continue test plots if failure do not scale up",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2014,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_Corte_Madera_Bay_2014_Test_Plot_2_PM_Method2,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_Corte_Madera_Bay_2014_Test_Plot_2_PM_Method2_3mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Corte Madera Bay,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,Point Molate; used this bed as Donor to compare to Cosco Busan DARP plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Point Molate,2014,July,Summer,1,semi-annually,3,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,225,150,ND,3,ND,ND,ND,NA,Test plot persistence,N,N,"part of incremental/adaptive restoration plan, continue test plots if failure do not scale up",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2014,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_Corte_Madera_Bay_2014_Test_Plot_3_PM_Method2,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_Corte_Madera_Bay_2014_Test_Plot_3_PM_Method2_3mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Corte Madera Bay,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,Point Molate; used this bed as Donor to compare to Cosco Busan DARP plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Point Molate,2014,August,Summer,1,semi-annually,3,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,225,150,ND,3,ND,ND,ND,NA,Test plot persistence,N,N,"part of incremental/adaptive restoration plan, continue test plots if failure do not scale up",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2014,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_Corte_Madera_Bay_2014_Test_Plot_4_PM_Method2,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_Corte_Madera_Bay_2014_Test_Plot_4_PM_Method2_3mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Corte Madera Bay,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,Point Molate; used this bed as Donor to compare to Cosco Busan DARP plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Point Molate,2014,September,Summer,1,semi-annually,3,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,225,150,ND,3,ND,ND,ND,NA,Test plot persistence,N,N,"part of incremental/adaptive restoration plan, continue test plots if failure do not scale up",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2016,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2016_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_PM _North_Method1,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2016_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_PM _North_Method1_7mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Marin Rod and Gun Club (San Rafael Bay Shoreline),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,Point Molate,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Point Molate,2016,June,Summer,1,semi-annually,7,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,225,150,ND,3,78,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation target,N,N,"Mitigation ratio was calculated using the area of expected impact (3.6 acres...later report stats that this was an overestimate) and area planted 5.5 acres--but initially the report states that 10.8 acres needed to be mitigated; Final area restored and % vegetative cover is listed as ""ND"" because the way the restoration was designed (and the rest of the data collected) was to break plots up by donor bed but the total area restored over time figure is per site, not per donor bed plot WITHIN site.",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2016,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2016_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_PSP_Method2,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2016_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_PSP_Method2_7mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Marin Rod and Gun Club (San Rafael Bay Shoreline),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,Point San Pablo/Point PinoleP,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Point San Pablo/Point PinoleP,2016,June,Summer,1,semi-annually,7,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,450,150,ND,3,80,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation target,N,N,"Mitigation ratio was calculated using the area of expected impact (3.6 acres...later report stats that this was an overestimate) and area planted 5.5 acres--but initially the report states that 10.8 acres needed to be mitigated; Final area restored and % vegetative cover is listed as ""ND"" because the way the restoration was designed (and the rest of the data collected) was to break plots up by donor bed but the total area restored over time figure is per site, not per donor bed plot WITHIN site.",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2016,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2016_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_PM_Method2,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2016_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_PM_Method2_7mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Marin Rod and Gun Club (San Rafael Bay Shoreline),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,Point Molate,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Point Molate,2016,June,Summer,1,semi-annually,7,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,450,150,ND,3,100,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation target,N,N,"Mitigation ratio was calculated using the area of expected impact (3.6 acres...later report stats that this was an overestimate) and area planted 5.5 acres--but initially the report states that 10.8 acres needed to be mitigated; Final area restored and % vegetative cover is listed as ""ND"" because the way the restoration was designed (and the rest of the data collected) was to break plots up by donor bed but the total area restored over time figure is per site, not per donor bed plot WITHIN site.",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2016,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2016_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_RB_Method2,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2016_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_RB_Method2_7mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Marin Rod and Gun Club (San Rafael Bay Shoreline),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,Richardson Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Richardson Bay,2016,June,Summer,1,semi-annually,7,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,450,150,ND,3,94.4,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation target,N,N,"Mitigation ratio was calculated using the area of expected impact (3.6 acres...later report stats that this was an overestimate) and area planted 5.5 acres--but initially the report states that 10.8 acres needed to be mitigated; Final area restored and % vegetative cover is listed as ""ND"" because the way the restoration was designed (and the rest of the data collected) was to break plots up by donor bed but the total area restored over time figure is per site, not per donor bed plot WITHIN site.",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2016,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2016_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_Mix_Method2,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2016_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_Mix_Method2_7mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Marin Rod and Gun Club (San Rafael Bay Shoreline),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,Mixed Donor,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Mixed Donor,2016,June,Summer,1,semi-annually,7,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,450,150,ND,3,110,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation target,N,N,"Mitigation ratio was calculated using the area of expected impact (3.6 acres...later report stats that this was an overestimate) and area planted 5.5 acres--but initially the report states that 10.8 acres needed to be mitigated; Final area restored and % vegetative cover is listed as ""ND"" because the way the restoration was designed (and the rest of the data collected) was to break plots up by donor bed but the total area restored over time figure is per site, not per donor bed plot WITHIN site.",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2016,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2016_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_PM _South_Method1,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2016_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_PM _South_Method1_7mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Marin Rod and Gun Club (San Rafael Bay Shoreline),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,Point Molate,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Point Molate,2016,June,Summer,1,semi-annually,7,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,225,150,ND,3,44,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation target,N,N,"Mitigation ratio was calculated using the area of expected impact (3.6 acres...later report stats that this was an overestimate) and area planted 5.5 acres--but initially the report states that 10.8 acres needed to be mitigated; Final area restored and % vegetative cover is listed as ""ND"" because the way the restoration was designed (and the rest of the data collected) was to break plots up by donor bed but the total area restored over time figure is per site, not per donor bed plot WITHIN site.",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2016,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2016_North_of_Pier_Half_Acre_PM _North_Method1,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2016_North_of_Pier_Half_Acre_PM _North_Method1_7mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Marin Rod and Gun Club (San Rafael Bay Shoreline),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,Point Molate,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Point Molate,2016,June,Summer,1,semi-annually,7,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,225,150,ND,3,32,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation target,N,N,"Mitigation ratio was calculated using the area of expected impact (3.6 acres...later report stats that this was an overestimate) and area planted 5.5 acres--but initially the report states that 10.8 acres needed to be mitigated; Final area restored and % vegetative cover is listed as ""ND"" because the way the restoration was designed (and the rest of the data collected) was to break plots up by donor bed but the total area restored over time figure is per site, not per donor bed plot WITHIN site.",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2016,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2016_North_of_Pier_Half_Acre_PSP_Method2,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2016_North_of_Pier_Half_Acre_PSP_Method2_7mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Marin Rod and Gun Club (San Rafael Bay Shoreline),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,Point San Pablo/Point Pinole,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Point San Pablo/Point PinoleP,2016,June,Summer,1,semi-annually,7,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,450,150,ND,3,52,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation target,N,N,"Mitigation ratio was calculated using the area of expected impact (3.6 acres...later report stats that this was an overestimate) and area planted 5.5 acres--but initially the report states that 10.8 acres needed to be mitigated; Final area restored and % vegetative cover is listed as ""ND"" because the way the restoration was designed (and the rest of the data collected) was to break plots up by donor bed but the total area restored over time figure is per site, not per donor bed plot WITHIN site.",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2016,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2016_North_of_Pier_Half_Acre_PM_Method2,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2016_North_of_Pier_Half_Acre_PM_Method2_7mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Marin Rod and Gun Club (San Rafael Bay Shoreline),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,Point Molate,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Point Molate,2016,June,Summer,1,semi-annually,7,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,450,150,ND,3,60,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation target,N,N,"Mitigation ratio was calculated using the area of expected impact (3.6 acres...later report stats that this was an overestimate) and area planted 5.5 acres--but initially the report states that 10.8 acres needed to be mitigated; Final area restored and % vegetative cover is listed as ""ND"" because the way the restoration was designed (and the rest of the data collected) was to break plots up by donor bed but the total area restored over time figure is per site, not per donor bed plot WITHIN site.",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2016,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2016_North_of_Pier_Half_Acre_RB_Method2,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2016_North_of_Pier_Half_Acre_RB_Method2_7mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Marin Rod and Gun Club (San Rafael Bay Shoreline),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,Richardson Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Richardson Bay,2016,June,Summer,1,semi-annually,7,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,450,150,ND,3,54,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation target,N,N,"Mitigation ratio was calculated using the area of expected impact (3.6 acres...later report stats that this was an overestimate) and area planted 5.5 acres--but initially the report states that 10.8 acres needed to be mitigated; Final area restored and % vegetative cover is listed as ""ND"" because the way the restoration was designed (and the rest of the data collected) was to break plots up by donor bed but the total area restored over time figure is per site, not per donor bed plot WITHIN site.",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2016,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2016_North_of_Pier_Half_Acre_Mix_Method2,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2016_North_of_Pier_Half_Acre_Mix_Method2_7mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Marin Rod and Gun Club (San Rafael Bay Shoreline),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,Mixed Donor,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Mixed Donor,2016,June,Summer,1,semi-annually,7,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,450,150,ND,3,57.6,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation target,N,N,"Mitigation ratio was calculated using the area of expected impact (3.6 acres...later report stats that this was an overestimate) and area planted 5.5 acres--but initially the report states that 10.8 acres needed to be mitigated; Final area restored and % vegetative cover is listed as ""ND"" because the way the restoration was designed (and the rest of the data collected) was to break plots up by donor bed but the total area restored over time figure is per site, not per donor bed plot WITHIN site.",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2016,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2016_North_of_Pier_Half_Acre_PM _South_Method1,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2016_North_of_Pier_Half_Acre_PM _South_Method1_7mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Marin Rod and Gun Club (San Rafael Bay Shoreline),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,Point Molate,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Point Molate,2016,June,Summer,1,semi-annually,7,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,225,150,ND,3,45.2,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation target,N,N,"Mitigation ratio was calculated using the area of expected impact (3.6 acres...later report stats that this was an overestimate) and area planted 5.5 acres--but initially the report states that 10.8 acres needed to be mitigated; Final area restored and % vegetative cover is listed as ""ND"" because the way the restoration was designed (and the rest of the data collected) was to break plots up by donor bed but the total area restored over time figure is per site, not per donor bed plot WITHIN site.",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2014,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_Corte_Madera_Bay_2014_Test_Plot_1_PM_Method2,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_Corte_Madera_Bay_2014_Test_Plot_1_PM_Method2_11mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Corte Madera Bay,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,Point Molate; used this bed as Donor to compare to Cosco Busan DARP plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Point Molate,2014,June,Summer,1,semi-annually,11,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,225,150,ND,3,ND,ND,ND,NA,Test plot persistence,N,N,"part of incremental/adaptive restoration plan, continue test plots if failure do not scale up",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2014,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_Corte_Madera_Bay_2014_Test_Plot_2_PM_Method2,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_Corte_Madera_Bay_2014_Test_Plot_2_PM_Method2_11mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Corte Madera Bay,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,Point Molate; used this bed as Donor to compare to Cosco Busan DARP plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Point Molate,2014,July,Summer,1,semi-annually,11,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,225,150,ND,3,ND,ND,ND,NA,Test plot persistence,N,N,"part of incremental/adaptive restoration plan, continue test plots if failure do not scale up",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2014,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_Corte_Madera_Bay_2014_Test_Plot_3_PM_Method2,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_Corte_Madera_Bay_2014_Test_Plot_3_PM_Method2_11mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Corte Madera Bay,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,Point Molate; used this bed as Donor to compare to Cosco Busan DARP plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Point Molate,2014,August,Summer,1,semi-annually,11,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,225,150,ND,3,ND,ND,ND,NA,Test plot persistence,N,N,"part of incremental/adaptive restoration plan, continue test plots if failure do not scale up",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2014,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_Corte_Madera_Bay_2014_Test_Plot_4_PM_Method2,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_Corte_Madera_Bay_2014_Test_Plot_4_PM_Method2_11mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Corte Madera Bay,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,Point Molate; used this bed as Donor to compare to Cosco Busan DARP plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Point Molate,2014,September,Summer,1,semi-annually,11,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,225,150,ND,3,ND,ND,ND,NA,Test plot persistence,N,N,"part of incremental/adaptive restoration plan, continue test plots if failure do not scale up",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2015,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_Richardson_Bay_2015_Western_Half_Acre_PM_North _Method1,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_Richardson_Bay_2015_Western_Half_Acre_PM_North _Method1_12mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Richardson Bay,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,Point Molate,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Point Molate,2015,May,Spring,2,semi-annually,12,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,225,150,ND,3,8,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation target,Y,N,"Mitigation ratio was calculated using the area of expected impact (3.6 acres...later report stats that this was an overestimate) and area planted 5.5 acres--but initially the report states that 10.8 acres needed to be mitigated; Final area restored and % vegetative cover is listed as ""ND"" because the way the restoration was designed (and the rest of the data collected) was to break plots up by donor bed but the total area restored over time figure is per site, not per donor bed plot WITHIN site.",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2015,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_Richardson_Bay_2015_Western_Half_Acre_PSP_Method2,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_Richardson_Bay_2015_Western_Half_Acre_PSP_Method2_12mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Richardson Bay,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,Point San Pablo/Point Pinole,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Point San Pablo/Point PinoleP,2015,May,Spring,2,semi-annually,12,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,450,150,ND,3,5.6,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation target,Y,N,"Mitigation ratio was calculated using the area of expected impact (3.6 acres...later report stats that this was an overestimate) and area planted 5.5 acres--but initially the report states that 10.8 acres needed to be mitigated; Final area restored and % vegetative cover is listed as ""ND"" because the way the restoration was designed (and the rest of the data collected) was to break plots up by donor bed but the total area restored over time figure is per site, not per donor bed plot WITHIN site.",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2015,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_Richardson_Bay_2015_Western_Half_Acre_PM_Method2,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_Richardson_Bay_2015_Western_Half_Acre_PM_Method2_12mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Richardson Bay,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,Point Molate,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Point Molate,2015,May,Spring,2,semi-annually,12,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,450,150,ND,3,6.4,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation target,Y,N,"Mitigation ratio was calculated using the area of expected impact (3.6 acres...later report stats that this was an overestimate) and area planted 5.5 acres--but initially the report states that 10.8 acres needed to be mitigated; Final area restored and % vegetative cover is listed as ""ND"" because the way the restoration was designed (and the rest of the data collected) was to break plots up by donor bed but the total area restored over time figure is per site, not per donor bed plot WITHIN site.",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2015,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_Richardson_Bay_2015_Western_Half_Acre_RB_Method2,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_Richardson_Bay_2015_Western_Half_Acre_RB_Method2_12mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Richardson Bay,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,Richardson Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Richardson Bay,2015,May,Spring,2,semi-annually,12,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,450,150,ND,3,25.2,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation target,Y,N,"Mitigation ratio was calculated using the area of expected impact (3.6 acres...later report stats that this was an overestimate) and area planted 5.5 acres--but initially the report states that 10.8 acres needed to be mitigated; Final area restored and % vegetative cover is listed as ""ND"" because the way the restoration was designed (and the rest of the data collected) was to break plots up by donor bed but the total area restored over time figure is per site, not per donor bed plot WITHIN site.",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2015,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_Richardson_Bay_2015_Western_Half_Acre_Mix_Method2,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_Richardson_Bay_2015_Western_Half_Acre_Mix_Method2_12mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Richardson Bay,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,Mixed Donor,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Mixed Donor,2015,May,Spring,2,semi-annually,12,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,450,150,ND,3,5.2,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation target,Y,N,"Mitigation ratio was calculated using the area of expected impact (3.6 acres...later report stats that this was an overestimate) and area planted 5.5 acres--but initially the report states that 10.8 acres needed to be mitigated; Final area restored and % vegetative cover is listed as ""ND"" because the way the restoration was designed (and the rest of the data collected) was to break plots up by donor bed but the total area restored over time figure is per site, not per donor bed plot WITHIN site.",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2015,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_Richardson_Bay_2015_Western_Half_Acre_PM _South_Method1,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_Richardson_Bay_2015_Western_Half_Acre_PM _South_Method1_12mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Richardson Bay,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,Point Molate,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Point Molate,2015,May,Spring,2,semi-annually,12,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,225,150,ND,3,12,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation target,Y,N,"Mitigation ratio was calculated using the area of expected impact (3.6 acres...later report stats that this was an overestimate) and area planted 5.5 acres--but initially the report states that 10.8 acres needed to be mitigated; Final area restored and % vegetative cover is listed as ""ND"" because the way the restoration was designed (and the rest of the data collected) was to break plots up by donor bed but the total area restored over time figure is per site, not per donor bed plot WITHIN site.",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2015,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2015_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_PM _North_Method1,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2015_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_PM _North_Method1_12mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Marin Rod and Gun Club (San Rafael Bay Shoreline),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,Point Molate,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Point Molate,2015,May,Spring,2,semi-annually,12,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,225,150,ND,3,36,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation target,N,N,"Mitigation ratio was calculated using the area of expected impact (3.6 acres...later report stats that this was an overestimate) and area planted 5.5 acres--but initially the report states that 10.8 acres needed to be mitigated; Final area restored and % vegetative cover is listed as ""ND"" because the way the restoration was designed (and the rest of the data collected) was to break plots up by donor bed but the total area restored over time figure is per site, not per donor bed plot WITHIN site.",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2015,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2015_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_PSP_Method2,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2015_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_PSP_Method2_12mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Marin Rod and Gun Club (San Rafael Bay Shoreline),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,Point San Pablo/Point Pinole,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Point San Pablo/Point PinoleP,2015,May,Spring,2,semi-annually,12,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,450,150,ND,3,58.4,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation target,N,N,"Mitigation ratio was calculated using the area of expected impact (3.6 acres...later report stats that this was an overestimate) and area planted 5.5 acres--but initially the report states that 10.8 acres needed to be mitigated; Final area restored and % vegetative cover is listed as ""ND"" because the way the restoration was designed (and the rest of the data collected) was to break plots up by donor bed but the total area restored over time figure is per site, not per donor bed plot WITHIN site.",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2015,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2015_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_PM_Method2,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2015_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_PM_Method2_12mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Marin Rod and Gun Club (San Rafael Bay Shoreline),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,Point Molate,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Point Molate,2015,May,Spring,2,semi-annually,12,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,450,150,ND,3,58,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation target,N,N,"Mitigation ratio was calculated using the area of expected impact (3.6 acres...later report stats that this was an overestimate) and area planted 5.5 acres--but initially the report states that 10.8 acres needed to be mitigated; Final area restored and % vegetative cover is listed as ""ND"" because the way the restoration was designed (and the rest of the data collected) was to break plots up by donor bed but the total area restored over time figure is per site, not per donor bed plot WITHIN site.",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2015,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2015_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_RB_Method2,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2015_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_RB_Method2_12mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Marin Rod and Gun Club (San Rafael Bay Shoreline),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,Richardson Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Richardson Bay,2015,May,Spring,2,semi-annually,12,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,450,150,ND,3,60,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation target,N,N,"Mitigation ratio was calculated using the area of expected impact (3.6 acres...later report stats that this was an overestimate) and area planted 5.5 acres--but initially the report states that 10.8 acres needed to be mitigated; Final area restored and % vegetative cover is listed as ""ND"" because the way the restoration was designed (and the rest of the data collected) was to break plots up by donor bed but the total area restored over time figure is per site, not per donor bed plot WITHIN site.",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2015,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2015_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_Mix_Method2,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2015_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_Mix_Method2_12mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Marin Rod and Gun Club (San Rafael Bay Shoreline),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,Mixed Donor,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Mixed Donor,2015,May,Spring,2,semi-annually,12,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,450,150,ND,3,48,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation target,N,N,"Mitigation ratio was calculated using the area of expected impact (3.6 acres...later report stats that this was an overestimate) and area planted 5.5 acres--but initially the report states that 10.8 acres needed to be mitigated; Final area restored and % vegetative cover is listed as ""ND"" because the way the restoration was designed (and the rest of the data collected) was to break plots up by donor bed but the total area restored over time figure is per site, not per donor bed plot WITHIN site.",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2015,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2015_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_PM_South_Method1,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2015_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_PM_South_Method1_12mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Marin Rod and Gun Club (San Rafael Bay Shoreline),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,Point Molate; used this bed as Donor to compare to Cosco Busan DARP plot,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Point Molate,2015,May,Spring,2,semi-annually,12,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,225,150,ND,3,30.8,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation target,N,N,"Mitigation ratio was calculated using the area of expected impact (3.6 acres...later report stats that this was an overestimate) and area planted 5.5 acres--but initially the report states that 10.8 acres needed to be mitigated; Final area restored and % vegetative cover is listed as ""ND"" because the way the restoration was designed (and the rest of the data collected) was to break plots up by donor bed but the total area restored over time figure is per site, not per donor bed plot WITHIN site.",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2016,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_Richardson_Bay_2016_Eastern_Half_Acre_PM _North_Method1,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_Richardson_Bay_2016_Eastern_Half_Acre_PM _North_Method1_18mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Richardson Bay,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,Point Molate,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Point Molate,2016,June,Summer,1,semi-annually,18,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,225,150,ND,3,13.6,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation target,Y,N,"Mitigation ratio was calculated using the area of expected impact (3.6 acres...later report stats that this was an overestimate) and area planted 5.5 acres--but initially the report states that 10.8 acres needed to be mitigated; Final area restored and % vegetative cover is listed as ""ND"" because the way the restoration was designed (and the rest of the data collected) was to break plots up by donor bed but the total area restored over time figure is per site, not per donor bed plot WITHIN site.",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2016,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_Richardson_Bay_2016_Eastern_Half_Acre_PSP_Method2,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_Richardson_Bay_2016_Eastern_Half_Acre_PSP_Method2_18mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Richardson Bay,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,Point San Pablo/Point Pinole,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Point San Pablo/Point PinoleP,2016,June,Summer,1,semi-annually,18,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,450,150,ND,3,16.8,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation target,Y,N,"Mitigation ratio was calculated using the area of expected impact (3.6 acres...later report stats that this was an overestimate) and area planted 5.5 acres--but initially the report states that 10.8 acres needed to be mitigated; Final area restored and % vegetative cover is listed as ""ND"" because the way the restoration was designed (and the rest of the data collected) was to break plots up by donor bed but the total area restored over time figure is per site, not per donor bed plot WITHIN site.",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2016,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_Richardson_Bay_2016_Eastern_Half_Acre_PM_Method2,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_Richardson_Bay_2016_Eastern_Half_Acre_PM_Method2_18mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Richardson Bay,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,Point Molate,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Point Molate,2016,June,Summer,1,semi-annually,18,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,450,150,ND,3,23.2,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation target,Y,N,"Mitigation ratio was calculated using the area of expected impact (3.6 acres...later report stats that this was an overestimate) and area planted 5.5 acres--but initially the report states that 10.8 acres needed to be mitigated; Final area restored and % vegetative cover is listed as ""ND"" because the way the restoration was designed (and the rest of the data collected) was to break plots up by donor bed but the total area restored over time figure is per site, not per donor bed plot WITHIN site.",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2016,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_Richardson_Bay_2016_Eastern_Half_Acre_RB_Method2,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_Richardson_Bay_2016_Eastern_Half_Acre_RB_Method2_18mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Richardson Bay,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,Richardson Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Richardson Bay,2016,June,Summer,1,semi-annually,18,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,450,150,ND,3,18.4,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation target,Y,N,"Mitigation ratio was calculated using the area of expected impact (3.6 acres...later report stats that this was an overestimate) and area planted 5.5 acres--but initially the report states that 10.8 acres needed to be mitigated; Final area restored and % vegetative cover is listed as ""ND"" because the way the restoration was designed (and the rest of the data collected) was to break plots up by donor bed but the total area restored over time figure is per site, not per donor bed plot WITHIN site.",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2016,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_Richardson_Bay_2016_Eastern_Half_Acre_Mix_Method2,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_Richardson_Bay_2016_Eastern_Half_Acre_Mix_Method2_18mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Richardson Bay,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,Mixed Donor,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Mixed Donor,2016,June,Summer,1,semi-annually,18,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,450,150,ND,3,30.4,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation target,Y,N,"Mitigation ratio was calculated using the area of expected impact (3.6 acres...later report stats that this was an overestimate) and area planted 5.5 acres--but initially the report states that 10.8 acres needed to be mitigated; Final area restored and % vegetative cover is listed as ""ND"" because the way the restoration was designed (and the rest of the data collected) was to break plots up by donor bed but the total area restored over time figure is per site, not per donor bed plot WITHIN site.",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2016,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_Richardson_Bay_2016_Eastern_Half_Acre_PM _South_Method1,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_Richardson_Bay_2016_Eastern_Half_Acre_PM _South_Method1_18mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Richardson Bay,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,Point Molate,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Point Molate,2016,June,Summer,1,semi-annually,18,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,225,150,ND,3,12,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation target,Y,N,"Mitigation ratio was calculated using the area of expected impact (3.6 acres...later report stats that this was an overestimate) and area planted 5.5 acres--but initially the report states that 10.8 acres needed to be mitigated; Final area restored and % vegetative cover is listed as ""ND"" because the way the restoration was designed (and the rest of the data collected) was to break plots up by donor bed but the total area restored over time figure is per site, not per donor bed plot WITHIN site.",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2016,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_Richardson_Bay_2016_Western_Half_Acre_PM _North_Method1,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_Richardson_Bay_2016_Western_Half_Acre_PM _North_Method1_18mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Richardson Bay,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,Point Molate,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Point Molate,2016,June,Summer,1,semi-annually,18,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,225,150,ND,3,30,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation target,Y,N,"Mitigation ratio was calculated using the area of expected impact (3.6 acres...later report stats that this was an overestimate) and area planted 5.5 acres--but initially the report states that 10.8 acres needed to be mitigated; Final area restored and % vegetative cover is listed as ""ND"" because the way the restoration was designed (and the rest of the data collected) was to break plots up by donor bed but the total area restored over time figure is per site, not per donor bed plot WITHIN site.",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2016,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_Richardson_Bay_2016_Western_Half_Acre_PSP_Method2,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_Richardson_Bay_2016_Western_Half_Acre_PSP_Method2_18mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Richardson Bay,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,Point San Pablo/Point Pinole,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Point San Pablo/Point PinoleP,2016,June,Summer,1,semi-annually,18,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,450,150,ND,3,40.4,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation target,Y,N,"Mitigation ratio was calculated using the area of expected impact (3.6 acres...later report stats that this was an overestimate) and area planted 5.5 acres--but initially the report states that 10.8 acres needed to be mitigated; Final area restored and % vegetative cover is listed as ""ND"" because the way the restoration was designed (and the rest of the data collected) was to break plots up by donor bed but the total area restored over time figure is per site, not per donor bed plot WITHIN site.",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2016,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_Richardson_Bay_2016_Western_Half_Acre_PM_Method2,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_Richardson_Bay_2016_Western_Half_Acre_PM_Method2_18mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Richardson Bay,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,Point Molate,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Point Molate,2016,June,Summer,1,semi-annually,18,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,450,150,ND,3,32,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation target,Y,N,"Mitigation ratio was calculated using the area of expected impact (3.6 acres...later report stats that this was an overestimate) and area planted 5.5 acres--but initially the report states that 10.8 acres needed to be mitigated; Final area restored and % vegetative cover is listed as ""ND"" because the way the restoration was designed (and the rest of the data collected) was to break plots up by donor bed but the total area restored over time figure is per site, not per donor bed plot WITHIN site.",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2016,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_Richardson_Bay_2016_Western_Half_Acre_RB_Method2,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_Richardson_Bay_2016_Western_Half_Acre_RB_Method2_18mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Richardson Bay,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,Richardson Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Richardson Bay,2016,June,Summer,1,semi-annually,18,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,450,150,ND,3,34.4,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation target,Y,N,"Mitigation ratio was calculated using the area of expected impact (3.6 acres...later report stats that this was an overestimate) and area planted 5.5 acres--but initially the report states that 10.8 acres needed to be mitigated; Final area restored and % vegetative cover is listed as ""ND"" because the way the restoration was designed (and the rest of the data collected) was to break plots up by donor bed but the total area restored over time figure is per site, not per donor bed plot WITHIN site.",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2016,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_Richardson_Bay_2016_Western_Half_Acre_Mix_Method2,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_Richardson_Bay_2016_Western_Half_Acre_Mix_Method2_18mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Richardson Bay,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,Mixed Donor,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Mixed Donor,2016,June,Summer,1,semi-annually,18,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,450,150,ND,3,20,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation target,Y,N,"Mitigation ratio was calculated using the area of expected impact (3.6 acres...later report stats that this was an overestimate) and area planted 5.5 acres--but initially the report states that 10.8 acres needed to be mitigated; Final area restored and % vegetative cover is listed as ""ND"" because the way the restoration was designed (and the rest of the data collected) was to break plots up by donor bed but the total area restored over time figure is per site, not per donor bed plot WITHIN site.",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2016,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_Richardson_Bay_2016_Western_Half_Acre_PM _South_Method1,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_Richardson_Bay_2016_Western_Half_Acre_PM _South_Method1_18mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Richardson Bay,37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,Point Molate,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Point Molate,2016,June,Summer,1,semi-annually,18,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,225,150,ND,3,34,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation target,Y,N,"Mitigation ratio was calculated using the area of expected impact (3.6 acres...later report stats that this was an overestimate) and area planted 5.5 acres--but initially the report states that 10.8 acres needed to be mitigated; Final area restored and % vegetative cover is listed as ""ND"" because the way the restoration was designed (and the rest of the data collected) was to break plots up by donor bed but the total area restored over time figure is per site, not per donor bed plot WITHIN site.",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2016,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2016_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_PM _North_Method1,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2016_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_PM _North_Method1_18mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Marin Rod and Gun Club (San Rafael Bay Shoreline),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,Point Molate,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Point Molate,2016,June,Summer,1,semi-annually,18,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,225,150,ND,3,0,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation target,N,N,"Mitigation ratio was calculated using the area of expected impact (3.6 acres...later report stats that this was an overestimate) and area planted 5.5 acres--but initially the report states that 10.8 acres needed to be mitigated; Final area restored and % vegetative cover is listed as ""ND"" because the way the restoration was designed (and the rest of the data collected) was to break plots up by donor bed but the total area restored over time figure is per site, not per donor bed plot WITHIN site.",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2016,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2016_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_PSP_Method2,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2016_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_PSP_Method2_18mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Marin Rod and Gun Club (San Rafael Bay Shoreline),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,Point San Pablo/Point Pinole,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Point San Pablo/Point PinoleP,2016,June,Summer,1,semi-annually,18,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,450,150,ND,3,33,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation target,N,N,"Mitigation ratio was calculated using the area of expected impact (3.6 acres...later report stats that this was an overestimate) and area planted 5.5 acres--but initially the report states that 10.8 acres needed to be mitigated; Final area restored and % vegetative cover is listed as ""ND"" because the way the restoration was designed (and the rest of the data collected) was to break plots up by donor bed but the total area restored over time figure is per site, not per donor bed plot WITHIN site.",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2016,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2016_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_PM_Method2,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2016_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_PM_Method2_18mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Marin Rod and Gun Club (San Rafael Bay Shoreline),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,Point Molate,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Point Molate,2016,June,Summer,1,semi-annually,18,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,450,150,ND,3,28,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation target,N,N,"Mitigation ratio was calculated using the area of expected impact (3.6 acres...later report stats that this was an overestimate) and area planted 5.5 acres--but initially the report states that 10.8 acres needed to be mitigated; Final area restored and % vegetative cover is listed as ""ND"" because the way the restoration was designed (and the rest of the data collected) was to break plots up by donor bed but the total area restored over time figure is per site, not per donor bed plot WITHIN site.",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2016,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2016_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_RB_Method2,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2016_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_RB_Method2_18mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Marin Rod and Gun Club (San Rafael Bay Shoreline),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,Richardson Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Richardson Bay,2016,June,Summer,1,semi-annually,18,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,450,150,ND,3,0,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation target,N,N,"Mitigation ratio was calculated using the area of expected impact (3.6 acres...later report stats that this was an overestimate) and area planted 5.5 acres--but initially the report states that 10.8 acres needed to be mitigated; Final area restored and % vegetative cover is listed as ""ND"" because the way the restoration was designed (and the rest of the data collected) was to break plots up by donor bed but the total area restored over time figure is per site, not per donor bed plot WITHIN site.",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2016,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2016_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_Mix_Method2,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2016_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_Mix_Method2_18mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Marin Rod and Gun Club (San Rafael Bay Shoreline),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,Mixed Donor,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Mixed Donor,2016,June,Summer,1,semi-annually,18,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,450,150,ND,3,36,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation target,N,N,"Mitigation ratio was calculated using the area of expected impact (3.6 acres...later report stats that this was an overestimate) and area planted 5.5 acres--but initially the report states that 10.8 acres needed to be mitigated; Final area restored and % vegetative cover is listed as ""ND"" because the way the restoration was designed (and the rest of the data collected) was to break plots up by donor bed but the total area restored over time figure is per site, not per donor bed plot WITHIN site.",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2016,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2016_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_PM _South_Method1,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2016_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_PM _South_Method1_18mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Marin Rod and Gun Club (San Rafael Bay Shoreline),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,Point Molate,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Point Molate,2016,June,Summer,1,semi-annually,18,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,225,150,ND,3,40,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation target,N,N,"Mitigation ratio was calculated using the area of expected impact (3.6 acres...later report stats that this was an overestimate) and area planted 5.5 acres--but initially the report states that 10.8 acres needed to be mitigated; Final area restored and % vegetative cover is listed as ""ND"" because the way the restoration was designed (and the rest of the data collected) was to break plots up by donor bed but the total area restored over time figure is per site, not per donor bed plot WITHIN site.",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2014,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2014_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_PSP_Method2,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2014_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_PSP_Method2_23mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Marin Rod and Gun Club (San Rafael Bay Shoreline),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,Point San Pablo/Point Pinole,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Point San Pablo/Point PinoleP,2014,June,Summer,3,semi-annually,23,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,75,150,ND,3,62.4,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation target,N,N,"Mitigation ratio was calculated using the area of expected impact (3.6 acres...later report stats that this was an overestimate) and area planted 5.5 acres--but initially the report states that 10.8 acres needed to be mitigated; Final area restored and % vegetative cover is listed as ""ND"" because the way the restoration was designed (and the rest of the data collected) was to break plots up by donor bed but the total area restored over time figure is per site, not per donor bed plot WITHIN site.",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2014,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2014_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_PM_Method2,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2014_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_PM_Method2_23mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Marin Rod and Gun Club (San Rafael Bay Shoreline),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,Point Molate,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Point Molate,2014,June,Summer,3,semi-annually,23,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,75,150,ND,3,69.6,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation target,N,N,"Mitigation ratio was calculated using the area of expected impact (3.6 acres...later report stats that this was an overestimate) and area planted 5.5 acres--but initially the report states that 10.8 acres needed to be mitigated; Final area restored and % vegetative cover is listed as ""ND"" because the way the restoration was designed (and the rest of the data collected) was to break plots up by donor bed but the total area restored over time figure is per site, not per donor bed plot WITHIN site.",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2014,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2014_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_KB_Method2,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2014_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_KB_Method2_23mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Marin Rod and Gun Club (San Rafael Bay Shoreline),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Keller Beach,2014,June,Summer,3,semi-annually,23,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,75,150,ND,3,62,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation target,N,N,"Mitigation ratio was calculated using the area of expected impact (3.6 acres...later report stats that this was an overestimate) and area planted 5.5 acres--but initially the report states that 10.8 acres needed to be mitigated; Final area restored and % vegetative cover is listed as ""ND"" because the way the restoration was designed (and the rest of the data collected) was to break plots up by donor bed but the total area restored over time figure is per site, not per donor bed plot WITHIN site.",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2014,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2014_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_RB_Method2,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2014_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_RB_Method2_23mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Marin Rod and Gun Club (San Rafael Bay Shoreline),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,Richardson Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Richardson Bay,2014,June,Summer,3,semi-annually,23,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,75,150,ND,3,48,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation target,N,N,"Mitigation ratio was calculated using the area of expected impact (3.6 acres...later report stats that this was an overestimate) and area planted 5.5 acres--but initially the report states that 10.8 acres needed to be mitigated; Final area restored and % vegetative cover is listed as ""ND"" because the way the restoration was designed (and the rest of the data collected) was to break plots up by donor bed but the total area restored over time figure is per site, not per donor bed plot WITHIN site.",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2014,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2014_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_Mix_Method2,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2014_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_Mix_Method2_23mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Marin Rod and Gun Club (San Rafael Bay Shoreline),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,Mixed Donor,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Mixed Donor,2014,June,Summer,3,semi-annually,23,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,75,150,ND,3,54,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation target,N,N,"Mitigation ratio was calculated using the area of expected impact (3.6 acres...later report stats that this was an overestimate) and area planted 5.5 acres--but initially the report states that 10.8 acres needed to be mitigated; Final area restored and % vegetative cover is listed as ""ND"" because the way the restoration was designed (and the rest of the data collected) was to break plots up by donor bed but the total area restored over time figure is per site, not per donor bed plot WITHIN site.",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2015,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2015_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_PM _North_Method1,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2015_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_PM _North_Method1_31mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Marin Rod and Gun Club (San Rafael Bay Shoreline),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,Point Molate,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Point Molate,2015,May,Spring,2.5,semi-annually,31,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,225,150,ND,3,33.6,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation target,N,N,"Mitigation ratio was calculated using the area of expected impact (3.6 acres...later report stats that this was an overestimate) and area planted 5.5 acres--but initially the report states that 10.8 acres needed to be mitigated; Final area restored and % vegetative cover is listed as ""ND"" because the way the restoration was designed (and the rest of the data collected) was to break plots up by donor bed but the total area restored over time figure is per site, not per donor bed plot WITHIN site.",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2015,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2015_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_PSP_Method2,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2015_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_PSP_Method2_31mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Marin Rod and Gun Club (San Rafael Bay Shoreline),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,Point San Pablo/Point Pinole,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Point San Pablo/Point PinoleP,2015,May,Spring,2.5,semi-annually,31,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,450,150,ND,3,37.2,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation target,N,N,"Mitigation ratio was calculated using the area of expected impact (3.6 acres...later report stats that this was an overestimate) and area planted 5.5 acres--but initially the report states that 10.8 acres needed to be mitigated; Final area restored and % vegetative cover is listed as ""ND"" because the way the restoration was designed (and the rest of the data collected) was to break plots up by donor bed but the total area restored over time figure is per site, not per donor bed plot WITHIN site.",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2015,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2015_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_PM_Method2,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2015_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_PM_Method2_31mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Marin Rod and Gun Club (San Rafael Bay Shoreline),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,Point Molate,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Point Molate,2015,May,Spring,2.5,semi-annually,31,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,450,150,ND,3,48,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation target,N,N,"Mitigation ratio was calculated using the area of expected impact (3.6 acres...later report stats that this was an overestimate) and area planted 5.5 acres--but initially the report states that 10.8 acres needed to be mitigated; Final area restored and % vegetative cover is listed as ""ND"" because the way the restoration was designed (and the rest of the data collected) was to break plots up by donor bed but the total area restored over time figure is per site, not per donor bed plot WITHIN site.",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2015,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2015_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_RB_Method2,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2015_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_RB_Method2_31mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Marin Rod and Gun Club (San Rafael Bay Shoreline),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,Richardson Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Richardson Bay,2015,May,Spring,2.5,semi-annually,31,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,450,150,ND,3,32,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation target,N,N,"Mitigation ratio was calculated using the area of expected impact (3.6 acres...later report stats that this was an overestimate) and area planted 5.5 acres--but initially the report states that 10.8 acres needed to be mitigated; Final area restored and % vegetative cover is listed as ""ND"" because the way the restoration was designed (and the rest of the data collected) was to break plots up by donor bed but the total area restored over time figure is per site, not per donor bed plot WITHIN site.",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2015,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2015_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_Mix_Method2,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2015_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_Mix_Method2_31mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Marin Rod and Gun Club (San Rafael Bay Shoreline),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,Mixed Donor,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Mixed Donor,2015,May,Spring,2.5,semi-annually,31,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,450,150,ND,3,50.8,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation target,N,N,"Mitigation ratio was calculated using the area of expected impact (3.6 acres...later report stats that this was an overestimate) and area planted 5.5 acres--but initially the report states that 10.8 acres needed to be mitigated; Final area restored and % vegetative cover is listed as ""ND"" because the way the restoration was designed (and the rest of the data collected) was to break plots up by donor bed but the total area restored over time figure is per site, not per donor bed plot WITHIN site.",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2015,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2015_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_PM _South_Method1,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2015_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_PM _South_Method1_31mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Marin Rod and Gun Club (San Rafael Bay Shoreline),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Bamboo/Rebar Stake,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,Point Molate,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Point Molate,2015,May,Spring,2.5,semi-annually,31,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,225,150,ND,3,48,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation target,N,N,"Mitigation ratio was calculated using the area of expected impact (3.6 acres...later report stats that this was an overestimate) and area planted 5.5 acres--but initially the report states that 10.8 acres needed to be mitigated; Final area restored and % vegetative cover is listed as ""ND"" because the way the restoration was designed (and the rest of the data collected) was to break plots up by donor bed but the total area restored over time figure is per site, not per donor bed plot WITHIN site.",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2014,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2014_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_PSP_Method2,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2014_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_PSP_Method2_42mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Marin Rod and Gun Club (San Rafael Bay Shoreline),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,Point San Pablo/Point Pinole,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Point San Pablo/Point PinoleP,2014,June,Summer,3.5,semi-annually,42,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,75,150,ND,3,0,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation target,N,N,"Mitigation ratio was calculated using the area of expected impact (3.6 acres...later report stats that this was an overestimate) and area planted 5.5 acres--but initially the report states that 10.8 acres needed to be mitigated; Final area restored and % vegetative cover is listed as ""ND"" because the way the restoration was designed (and the rest of the data collected) was to break plots up by donor bed but the total area restored over time figure is per site, not per donor bed plot WITHIN site.",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2014,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2014_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_PM_Method2,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2014_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_PM_Method2_42mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Marin Rod and Gun Club (San Rafael Bay Shoreline),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,Point Molate,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Point Molate,2014,June,Summer,3.5,semi-annually,42,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,75,150,ND,3,48,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation target,N,N,"Mitigation ratio was calculated using the area of expected impact (3.6 acres...later report stats that this was an overestimate) and area planted 5.5 acres--but initially the report states that 10.8 acres needed to be mitigated; Final area restored and % vegetative cover is listed as ""ND"" because the way the restoration was designed (and the rest of the data collected) was to break plots up by donor bed but the total area restored over time figure is per site, not per donor bed plot WITHIN site.",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2014,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2014_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_KB_Method2,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2014_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_KB_Method2_42mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Marin Rod and Gun Club (San Rafael Bay Shoreline),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,"Keller Beach (KB): Central Bay, easy shoreline access",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Keller Beach,2014,June,Summer,3.5,semi-annually,42,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,75,150,ND,3,37.6,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation target,N,N,"Mitigation ratio was calculated using the area of expected impact (3.6 acres...later report stats that this was an overestimate) and area planted 5.5 acres--but initially the report states that 10.8 acres needed to be mitigated; Final area restored and % vegetative cover is listed as ""ND"" because the way the restoration was designed (and the rest of the data collected) was to break plots up by donor bed but the total area restored over time figure is per site, not per donor bed plot WITHIN site.",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2014,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2014_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_RB_Method2,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2014_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_RB_Method2_42mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Marin Rod and Gun Club (San Rafael Bay Shoreline),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,Richardson Bay,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Richardson Bay,2014,June,Summer,3.5,semi-annually,42,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,75,150,ND,3,36,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation target,N,N,"Mitigation ratio was calculated using the area of expected impact (3.6 acres...later report stats that this was an overestimate) and area planted 5.5 acres--but initially the report states that 10.8 acres needed to be mitigated; Final area restored and % vegetative cover is listed as ""ND"" because the way the restoration was designed (and the rest of the data collected) was to break plots up by donor bed but the total area restored over time figure is per site, not per donor bed plot WITHIN site.",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_2014,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2014_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_Mix_Method2,SFOBB_and_DARP_Restoration_MRGC_2014_South_of_Pier_Half_Acre_Mix_Method2_42mo,NA,"Merkel & Associates, Romburg Tiburon Center, NOAA, NMFS, CDFW, TNC, Audobon Society, MRGC, BCDC",San Francisco,Marin Rod and Gun Club (San Rafael Bay Shoreline),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Many; particularly they note the invasive amphipod Ampithoe valida which grazes on seagrass,Y,Mitigation,Active,N,Popsicle stick,"Transplanted on SCUBA and in intertidal; had to hold shoots in holding tank and in beds with known invasive amphipods, shoots were repeatedly rinsed with freshwater to remove amphipods","Attempted to compare transplant design (bamboo vs popsicle stick) but failed to make comparison, similarly, they were interested in comparing donor bed performance and plots either all died or blended into one another making this difficult",N,Mixed Donor,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,Mixed Donor,2014,June,Summer,3.5,semi-annually,42,1.5,-2,Depth range of plots followed a -0.6 m contour and ranged from 0 to -1.2m MLLW (hence some transplanted was done on SCUBA),ND,ND,75,150,ND,3,28,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation target,N,N,"Mitigation ratio was calculated using the area of expected impact (3.6 acres...later report stats that this was an overestimate) and area planted 5.5 acres--but initially the report states that 10.8 acres needed to be mitigated; Final area restored and % vegetative cover is listed as ""ND"" because the way the restoration was designed (and the rest of the data collected) was to break plots up by donor bed but the total area restored over time figure is per site, not per donor bed plot WITHIN site.",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Looked at substrate type (rock, cobbe, sand)",Assessed these factors qualitatively to determine patterns of restoration plot failure or success,ND,NA,"Herring, invasive amphipod, bat rays, ghost shrimp",Herring,Counted number of herring eggs by substrate type and measured the dryweight of eggs/substrate; also measured % cover of different cover types one of which included herring eggs within quadrats collected from various sites,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Puget_Sound_SSM_Test_Plots_2013,Puget_Sound_SSM_Test_Plots_2013_Joemma_Beach_State_Park_deep,Puget_Sound_SSM_Test_Plots_2013_Joemma_Beach_State_Park_deep_12_mo,NA,"EPA, PNNL, WNR",Puget Sound,"Joemma Beach State Park, deep",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,"Anchored and unanchored, likely--but later in the paper they mention divers taking note of uprooted plant anchors","Unclear whether these transplants were anchored or unanchored, reference Thom et al. 2012 for methods in which they mention both anchored and unanchored techniques used",Y,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,No data is provided on reference or donor beds,2013,Unknown,Unknown,1,4-6 months post transplanting and 12 months post transplanting,12,NA,ND,"Paper mentions that they measured depth range, but they never report it",ND,ND,712,36,ND,20,25.83,ND,ND,NA,Plot survival,ND,Y,Recommending larger planting (promise as a restoration site),N,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Bathymetry and PAR,"Generated a SSM to develop potential restoration site maps, in the model they included hydrodynamic models, water quality data, bathymetry, presence/absence of eelgrass, substrate type, MEB (Modeled Eelgrass Biomass), whether there were overwater structures, shoreline armoring, historical seagrass presence, and stakeholder observations of losses and gains ",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,Y,NA
Puget_Sound_SSM_Test_Plots_2013,Puget_Sound_SSM_Test_Plots_2013_Joemma_Beach_State_Park_shallow,Puget_Sound_SSM_Test_Plots_2013_Joemma_Beach_State_Park_shallow_12_mo,NA,"EPA, PNNL, WNR",Puget Sound,"Joemma Beach State Park, shallow",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,"Anchored and unanchored, likely--but later in the paper they mention divers taking note of uprooted plant anchors","Unclear whether these transplants were anchored or unanchored, reference Thom et al. 2012 for methods in which they mention both anchored and unanchored techniques used",Y,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,No data is provided on reference or donor beds,2013,Unknown,Unknown,1,4-6 months post transplanting and 12 months post transplanting,12,NA,ND,"Paper mentions that they measured depth range, but they never report it",ND,ND,712,36,ND,20,21.53,ND,ND,NA,Plot survival,ND,Y,Recommending larger planting (promise as a restoration site),N,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Bathymetry and PAR,"Generated a SSM to develop potential restoration site maps, in the model they included hydrodynamic models, water quality data, bathymetry, presence/absence of eelgrass, substrate type, MEB (Modeled Eelgrass Biomass), whether there were overwater structures, shoreline armoring, historical seagrass presence, and stakeholder observations of losses and gains ",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,Y,NA
Puget_Sound_SSM_Test_Plots_2013,Puget_Sound_SSM_Test_Plots_2013_Zangle_Cove,Puget_Sound_SSM_Test_Plots_2013_Zangle_Cove_12_mo,NA,"EPA, PNNL, WNR",Puget Sound,Zangle Cove,47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,"Anchored and unanchored, likely--but later in the paper they mention divers taking note of uprooted plant anchors","Unclear whether these transplants were anchored or unanchored, reference Thom et al. 2012 for methods in which they mention both anchored and unanchored techniques used",Y,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,No data is provided on reference or donor beds,2013,Unknown,Unknown,1,4-6 months post transplanting and 12 months post transplanting,12,NA,ND,"Paper mentions that they measured depth range, but they never report it",ND,ND,872,45,ND,20,11.98,ND,ND,NA,Plot survival,ND,Y,Recommending targeted planting,N,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Bathymetry and PAR,"Generated a SSM to develop potential restoration site maps, in the model they included hydrodynamic models, water quality data, bathymetry, presence/absence of eelgrass, substrate type, MEB (Modeled Eelgrass Biomass), whether there were overwater structures, shoreline armoring, historical seagrass presence, and stakeholder observations of losses and gains ",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,Y,NA
Puget_Sound_SSM_Test_Plots_2013,Puget_Sound_SSM_Test_Plots_2013_Westcott_middle_bay,Puget_Sound_SSM_Test_Plots_2013_Westcott_middle_bay_12_mo,NA,"EPA, PNNL, WNR",Puget Sound,Westcott middle bay,47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,"Anchored and unanchored, likely--but later in the paper they mention divers taking note of uprooted plant anchors","Unclear whether these transplants were anchored or unanchored, reference Thom et al. 2012 for methods in which they mention both anchored and unanchored techniques used",Y,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,No data is provided on reference or donor beds,2013,Unknown,Unknown,1,4-6 months post transplanting and 12 months post transplanting,12,NA,ND,"Paper mentions that they measured depth range, but they never report it",ND,ND,472,25,ND,20,3.24,ND,ND,NA,Plot survival,ND,Y,Recommending another trial planting,N,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Bathymetry and PAR,"Generated a SSM to develop potential restoration site maps, in the model they included hydrodynamic models, water quality data, bathymetry, presence/absence of eelgrass, substrate type, MEB (Modeled Eelgrass Biomass), whether there were overwater structures, shoreline armoring, historical seagrass presence, and stakeholder observations of losses and gains ",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,Y,NA
Puget_Sound_SSM_Test_Plots_2013,Puget_Sound_SSM_Test_Plots_2013_Anderson_Island_deep,Puget_Sound_SSM_Test_Plots_2013_Anderson_Island_deep_12_mo,NA,"EPA, PNNL, WNR",Puget Sound,"Anderson Island, deep",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,"Anchored and unanchored, likely--but later in the paper they mention divers taking note of uprooted plant anchors","Unclear whether these transplants were anchored or unanchored, reference Thom et al. 2012 for methods in which they mention both anchored and unanchored techniques used",Y,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,No data is provided on reference or donor beds,2013,Unknown,Unknown,1,4-6 months post transplanting and 12 months post transplanting,12,NA,ND,"Paper mentions that they measured depth range, but they never report it",ND,ND,720,36,ND,20,0.39,ND,ND,NA,Plot survival,ND,N,Need to first reduce algae for restoration to succeed,N,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Bathymetry and PAR,"Generated a SSM to develop potential restoration site maps, in the model they included hydrodynamic models, water quality data, bathymetry, presence/absence of eelgrass, substrate type, MEB (Modeled Eelgrass Biomass), whether there were overwater structures, shoreline armoring, historical seagrass presence, and stakeholder observations of losses and gains ",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,Y,NA
Puget_Sound_SSM_Test_Plots_2013,Puget_Sound_SSM_Test_Plots_2013_Anderson_Island_shallow,Puget_Sound_SSM_Test_Plots_2013_Anderson_Island_shallow_12_mo,NA,"EPA, PNNL, WNR",Puget Sound,"Anderson Island, shallow",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,"Anchored and unanchored, likely--but later in the paper they mention divers taking note of uprooted plant anchors","Unclear whether these transplants were anchored or unanchored, reference Thom et al. 2012 for methods in which they mention both anchored and unanchored techniques used",Y,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,No data is provided on reference or donor beds,2013,Unknown,Unknown,1,4-6 months post transplanting and 12 months post transplanting,12,NA,ND,"Paper mentions that they measured depth range, but they never report it",ND,ND,720,36,ND,20,0.31,ND,ND,NA,Plot survival,ND,N,Need to first reduce algae for restoration to succeed,N,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Bathymetry and PAR,"Generated a SSM to develop potential restoration site maps, in the model they included hydrodynamic models, water quality data, bathymetry, presence/absence of eelgrass, substrate type, MEB (Modeled Eelgrass Biomass), whether there were overwater structures, shoreline armoring, historical seagrass presence, and stakeholder observations of losses and gains ",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,Y,NA
Puget_Sound_SSM_Test_Plots_2013,Puget_Sound_SSM_Test_Plots_2013_Liberty_Bay_mouth_(NW_site),Puget_Sound_SSM_Test_Plots_2013_Liberty_Bay_mouth_(NW_site)_12_mo,NA,"EPA, PNNL, WNR",Puget Sound,Liberty Bay mouth (NW site),47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,"Anchored and unanchored, likely--but later in the paper they mention divers taking note of uprooted plant anchors","Unclear whether these transplants were anchored or unanchored, reference Thom et al. 2012 for methods in which they mention both anchored and unanchored techniques used",Y,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,No data is provided on reference or donor beds,2013,Unknown,Unknown,1,4-6 months post transplanting and 12 months post transplanting,12,NA,ND,"Paper mentions that they measured depth range, but they never report it",ND,ND,600,30,ND,20,0.27,ND,ND,NA,Plot survival,ND,N,Need to improve light conditions for restoration to succeed,N,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Bathymetry and PAR,"Generated a SSM to develop potential restoration site maps, in the model they included hydrodynamic models, water quality data, bathymetry, presence/absence of eelgrass, substrate type, MEB (Modeled Eelgrass Biomass), whether there were overwater structures, shoreline armoring, historical seagrass presence, and stakeholder observations of losses and gains ",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,Y,NA
Puget_Sound_SSM_Test_Plots_2013,Puget_Sound_SSM_Test_Plots_2013_Liberty_Bay_mouth_(SE_site),Puget_Sound_SSM_Test_Plots_2013_Liberty_Bay_mouth_(SE_site)_12_mo,NA,"EPA, PNNL, WNR",Puget Sound,Liberty Bay mouth (SE site),47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,"Anchored and unanchored, likely--but later in the paper they mention divers taking note of uprooted plant anchors","Unclear whether these transplants were anchored or unanchored, reference Thom et al. 2012 for methods in which they mention both anchored and unanchored techniques used",Y,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,No data is provided on reference or donor beds,2013,Unknown,Unknown,1,4-6 months post transplanting and 12 months post transplanting,12,NA,ND,"Paper mentions that they measured depth range, but they never report it",ND,ND,720,36,ND,20,0.08,ND,ND,NA,Plot survival,ND,N,Need to improve light conditions for restoration to succeed,N,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Bathymetry and PAR,"Generated a SSM to develop potential restoration site maps, in the model they included hydrodynamic models, water quality data, bathymetry, presence/absence of eelgrass, substrate type, MEB (Modeled Eelgrass Biomass), whether there were overwater structures, shoreline armoring, historical seagrass presence, and stakeholder observations of losses and gains ",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,Y,NA
Puget_Sound_SSM_Test_Plots_2013,Puget_Sound_SSM_Test_Plots_2013_Westcott_head_of_bay,Puget_Sound_SSM_Test_Plots_2013_Westcott_head_of_bay_12_mo,NA,"EPA, PNNL, WNR",Puget Sound,Westcott head of bay,47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,"Anchored and unanchored, likely--but later in the paper they mention divers taking note of uprooted plant anchors","Unclear whether these transplants were anchored or unanchored, reference Thom et al. 2012 for methods in which they mention both anchored and unanchored techniques used",Y,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,No data is provided on reference or donor beds,2013,Unknown,Unknown,1,4-6 months post transplanting and 12 months post transplanting,12,NA,ND,"Paper mentions that they measured depth range, but they never report it",ND,ND,448,25,ND,20,0,ND,ND,NA,Plot survival,ND,N,Need to improve sediment and light conditions for restoration to succeed,N,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Y,Bathymetry and PAR,"Generated a SSM to develop potential restoration site maps, in the model they included hydrodynamic models, water quality data, bathymetry, presence/absence of eelgrass, substrate type, MEB (Modeled Eelgrass Biomass), whether there were overwater structures, shoreline armoring, historical seagrass presence, and stakeholder observations of losses and gains ",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Y,ND,ND,Y,NA
Grays_Harbor_WA_Dungies_Mitig_1990,Grays_Harbor_WA_Dungies_Mitig_1990_CSS1,Grays_Harbor_WA_Dungies_Mitig_1990_CSS1_2mo,NA,"PNNL, US Army Corp",Grays Harbor,Transplanted into ponds that were 1-6 cm deep and created by the placing of shell (for Dungeness habitat creation by Army Corp),46.95,-124.05,WA,Zostera japonica,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,"Tied bundles of 10 shoots to metal wire using plastic twist tie (metal wire ~ = to garden staple); 50-150 shoots per plot, spaced where bundles of 10 were spaced 10-20 cm apart","We don't have a category for shoots tied to metal wire extending 10-12"" so the closest is Garden Staple",Y,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,50,ND,NA,NA,"Reference shoot density range in 1995 is presented in Thom et al. 2012, the range is 30-70 shoots per m2, so took the average of the range=50 shoots/m2",1990,April-May,Spring,5,"approximately 2, 4, 16, 27, 40, 50, and 62 months",2,ND,0,Transplanted in ponds that were between 1 and 7 cm deep (intertidal seagrass),ND,ND,"50-150 shoots per plot, spaced where bundles of 10 were spaced 10-20 cm apart",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Similarity between transplanted and reference habitats,NA,Y,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,Did not measure environmental data but believe that failure at one plot (not reported/data unavailable) was due to dessiccation,ND,ND,ND,ND,"Since this project was started because of mitigation for Dungeness, Thom does explain (though did not measure) that the eelgrass habitat is critical for dungeness crab, salmon, etc. and that considering only the addition of shells (not shell+eelgrass) is to ignore benefits to animals besides dungeness",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Grays_Harbor_WA_Dungies_Mitig_1990,Grays_Harbor_WA_Dungies_Mitig_1990_CSS2,Grays_Harbor_WA_Dungies_Mitig_1990_CSS2_2mo,NA,"PNNL, US Army Corp",Grays Harbor,Transplanted into ponds that were 1-6 cm deep and created by the placing of shell (for Dungeness habitat creation by Army Corp),46.95,-124.05,WA,Zostera japonica,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,"Tied bundles of 10 shoots to metal wire using plastic twist tie (metal wire ~ = to garden staple); 50-150 shoots per plot, spaced where bundles of 10 were spaced 10-20 cm apart","We don't have a category for shoots tied to metal wire extending 10-12"" so the closest is Garden Staple",Y,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,50,ND,NA,NA,"Reference shoot density range in 1995 is presented in Thom et al. 2012, the range is 30-70 shoots per m2, so took the average of the range=50 shoots/m3",1990,April-May,Spring,5,"approximately 2, 4, 16, 27, 40, 50, and 62 months",2,ND,0,Transplanted in ponds that were between 1 and 7 cm deep (intertidal seagrass),ND,ND,"50-150 shoots per plot, spaced where bundles of 10 were spaced 10-20 cm apart",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Similarity between transplanted and reference habitats,NA,Y,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,Did not measure environmental data but believe that failure at one plot (not reported/data unavailable) was due to dessiccation,ND,ND,ND,ND,"Since this project was started because of mitigation for Dungeness, Thom does explain (though did not measure) that the eelgrass habitat is critical for dungeness crab, salmon, etc. and that considering only the addition of shells (not shell+eelgrass) is to ignore benefits to animals besides dungeness",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Grays_Harbor_WA_Dungies_Mitig_1990,Grays_Harbor_WA_Dungies_Mitig_1990_SCS1,Grays_Harbor_WA_Dungies_Mitig_1990_SCS1_2mo,NA,"PNNL, US Army Corp",Grays Harbor,Transplanted into ponds that were 1-6 cm deep and created by the placing of shell (for Dungeness habitat creation by Army Corp),46.95,-124.05,WA,Zostera japonica,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,"Tied bundles of 10 shoots to metal wire using plastic twist tie (metal wire ~ = to garden staple); 50-150 shoots per plot, spaced where bundles of 10 were spaced 10-20 cm apart","We don't have a category for shoots tied to metal wire extending 10-12"" so the closest is Garden Staple",Y,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,50,ND,NA,NA,"Reference shoot density range in 1995 is presented in Thom et al. 2012, the range is 30-70 shoots per m2, so took the average of the range=50 shoots/m4",1990,April-May,Spring,5,"approximately 2, 4, 16, 27, 40, 50, and 62 months",2,ND,0,Transplanted in ponds that were between 1 and 7 cm deep (intertidal seagrass),ND,ND,"50-150 shoots per plot, spaced where bundles of 10 were spaced 10-20 cm apart",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Similarity between transplanted and reference habitats,NA,Y,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,Did not measure environmental data but believe that failure at one plot (not reported/data unavailable) was due to dessiccation,ND,ND,ND,ND,"Since this project was started because of mitigation for Dungeness, Thom does explain (though did not measure) that the eelgrass habitat is critical for dungeness crab, salmon, etc. and that considering only the addition of shells (not shell+eelgrass) is to ignore benefits to animals besides dungeness",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Grays_Harbor_WA_Dungies_Mitig_1990,Grays_Harbor_WA_Dungies_Mitig_1990_SCS2,Grays_Harbor_WA_Dungies_Mitig_1990_SCS2_2mo,NA,"PNNL, US Army Corp",Grays Harbor,Transplanted into ponds that were 1-6 cm deep and created by the placing of shell (for Dungeness habitat creation by Army Corp),46.95,-124.05,WA,Zostera japonica,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,"Tied bundles of 10 shoots to metal wire using plastic twist tie (metal wire ~ = to garden staple); 50-150 shoots per plot, spaced where bundles of 10 were spaced 10-20 cm apart","We don't have a category for shoots tied to metal wire extending 10-12"" so the closest is Garden Staple",Y,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,50,ND,NA,NA,"Reference shoot density range in 1995 is presented in Thom et al. 2012, the range is 30-70 shoots per m2, so took the average of the range=50 shoots/m5",1990,April-May,Spring,5,"approximately 2, 4, 16, 27, 40, 50, and 62 months",2,ND,0,Transplanted in ponds that were between 1 and 7 cm deep (intertidal seagrass),ND,ND,"50-150 shoots per plot, spaced where bundles of 10 were spaced 10-20 cm apart",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Similarity between transplanted and reference habitats,NA,Y,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,Did not measure environmental data but believe that failure at one plot (not reported/data unavailable) was due to dessiccation,ND,ND,ND,ND,"Since this project was started because of mitigation for Dungeness, Thom does explain (though did not measure) that the eelgrass habitat is critical for dungeness crab, salmon, etc. and that considering only the addition of shells (not shell+eelgrass) is to ignore benefits to animals besides dungeness",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Grays_Harbor_WA_Dungies_Mitig_1990,Grays_Harbor_WA_Dungies_Mitig_1990_SCS3,Grays_Harbor_WA_Dungies_Mitig_1990_SCS3_2mo,NA,"PNNL, US Army Corp",Grays Harbor,Transplanted into ponds that were 1-6 cm deep and created by the placing of shell (for Dungeness habitat creation by Army Corp),46.95,-124.05,WA,Zostera japonica,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,"Tied bundles of 10 shoots to metal wire using plastic twist tie (metal wire ~ = to garden staple); 50-150 shoots per plot, spaced where bundles of 10 were spaced 10-20 cm apart","We don't have a category for shoots tied to metal wire extending 10-12"" so the closest is Garden Staple",Y,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,50,ND,NA,NA,"Reference shoot density range in 1995 is presented in Thom et al. 2012, the range is 30-70 shoots per m2, so took the average of the range=50 shoots/m6",1990,April-May,Spring,5,"approximately 2, 4, 16, 27, 40, 50, and 62 months",2,ND,0,Transplanted in ponds that were between 1 and 7 cm deep (intertidal seagrass),ND,ND,"50-150 shoots per plot, spaced where bundles of 10 were spaced 10-20 cm apart",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Similarity between transplanted and reference habitats,NA,Y,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,Did not measure environmental data but believe that failure at one plot (not reported/data unavailable) was due to dessiccation,ND,ND,ND,ND,"Since this project was started because of mitigation for Dungeness, Thom does explain (though did not measure) that the eelgrass habitat is critical for dungeness crab, salmon, etc. and that considering only the addition of shells (not shell+eelgrass) is to ignore benefits to animals besides dungeness",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Grays_Harbor_WA_Dungies_Mitig_1990,Grays_Harbor_WA_Dungies_Mitig_1990_SCS4,Grays_Harbor_WA_Dungies_Mitig_1990_SCS4_2mo,NA,"PNNL, US Army Corp",Grays Harbor,Transplanted into ponds that were 1-6 cm deep and created by the placing of shell (for Dungeness habitat creation by Army Corp),46.95,-124.05,WA,Zostera japonica,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,"Tied bundles of 10 shoots to metal wire using plastic twist tie (metal wire ~ = to garden staple); 50-150 shoots per plot, spaced where bundles of 10 were spaced 10-20 cm apart","We don't have a category for shoots tied to metal wire extending 10-12"" so the closest is Garden Staple",Y,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,50,ND,NA,NA,"Reference shoot density range in 1995 is presented in Thom et al. 2012, the range is 30-70 shoots per m2, so took the average of the range=50 shoots/m7",1990,April-May,Spring,5,"approximately 2, 4, 16, 27, 40, 50, and 62 months",2,ND,0,Transplanted in ponds that were between 1 and 7 cm deep (intertidal seagrass),ND,ND,"50-150 shoots per plot, spaced where bundles of 10 were spaced 10-20 cm apart",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Similarity between transplanted and reference habitats,NA,Y,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,Did not measure environmental data but believe that failure at one plot (not reported/data unavailable) was due to dessiccation,ND,ND,ND,ND,"Since this project was started because of mitigation for Dungeness, Thom does explain (though did not measure) that the eelgrass habitat is critical for dungeness crab, salmon, etc. and that considering only the addition of shells (not shell+eelgrass) is to ignore benefits to animals besides dungeness",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Grays_Harbor_WA_Dungies_Mitig_1990,Grays_Harbor_WA_Dungies_Mitig_1990_CSS1,Grays_Harbor_WA_Dungies_Mitig_1990_CSS1_16mo,NA,"PNNL, US Army Corp",Grays Harbor,Transplanted into ponds that were 1-6 cm deep and created by the placing of shell (for Dungeness habitat creation by Army Corp),46.95,-124.05,WA,Zostera japonica,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,"Tied bundles of 10 shoots to metal wire using plastic twist tie (metal wire ~ = to garden staple); 50-150 shoots per plot, spaced where bundles of 10 were spaced 10-20 cm apart","We don't have a category for shoots tied to metal wire extending 10-12"" so the closest is Garden Staple",Y,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,50,ND,NA,NA,"Reference shoot density range in 1995 is presented in Thom et al. 2012, the range is 30-70 shoots per m2, so took the average of the range=50 shoots/m8",1990,April-May,Spring,5,"approximately 2, 4, 16, 27, 40, 50, and 62 months",16,ND,0,Transplanted in ponds that were between 1 and 7 cm deep (intertidal seagrass),ND,ND,"50-150 shoots per plot, spaced where bundles of 10 were spaced 10-20 cm apart",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Similarity between transplanted and reference habitats,NA,Y,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,Did not measure environmental data but believe that failure at one plot (not reported/data unavailable) was due to dessiccation,ND,ND,ND,ND,"Since this project was started because of mitigation for Dungeness, Thom does explain (though did not measure) that the eelgrass habitat is critical for dungeness crab, salmon, etc. and that considering only the addition of shells (not shell+eelgrass) is to ignore benefits to animals besides dungeness",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Grays_Harbor_WA_Dungies_Mitig_1990,Grays_Harbor_WA_Dungies_Mitig_1990_CSS2,Grays_Harbor_WA_Dungies_Mitig_1990_CSS2_16mo,NA,"PNNL, US Army Corp",Grays Harbor,Transplanted into ponds that were 1-6 cm deep and created by the placing of shell (for Dungeness habitat creation by Army Corp),46.95,-124.05,WA,Zostera japonica,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,"Tied bundles of 10 shoots to metal wire using plastic twist tie (metal wire ~ = to garden staple); 50-150 shoots per plot, spaced where bundles of 10 were spaced 10-20 cm apart","We don't have a category for shoots tied to metal wire extending 10-12"" so the closest is Garden Staple",Y,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,50,ND,NA,NA,"Reference shoot density range in 1995 is presented in Thom et al. 2012, the range is 30-70 shoots per m2, so took the average of the range=50 shoots/m9",1990,April-May,Spring,5,"approximately 2, 4, 16, 27, 40, 50, and 62 months",16,ND,0,Transplanted in ponds that were between 1 and 7 cm deep (intertidal seagrass),ND,ND,"50-150 shoots per plot, spaced where bundles of 10 were spaced 10-20 cm apart",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Similarity between transplanted and reference habitats,NA,Y,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,Did not measure environmental data but believe that failure at one plot (not reported/data unavailable) was due to dessiccation,ND,ND,ND,ND,"Since this project was started because of mitigation for Dungeness, Thom does explain (though did not measure) that the eelgrass habitat is critical for dungeness crab, salmon, etc. and that considering only the addition of shells (not shell+eelgrass) is to ignore benefits to animals besides dungeness",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Grays_Harbor_WA_Dungies_Mitig_1990,Grays_Harbor_WA_Dungies_Mitig_1990_CSS1,Grays_Harbor_WA_Dungies_Mitig_1990_CSS1_27mo,NA,"PNNL, US Army Corp",Grays Harbor,Transplanted into ponds that were 1-6 cm deep and created by the placing of shell (for Dungeness habitat creation by Army Corp),46.95,-124.05,WA,Zostera japonica,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,"Tied bundles of 10 shoots to metal wire using plastic twist tie (metal wire ~ = to garden staple); 50-150 shoots per plot, spaced where bundles of 10 were spaced 10-20 cm apart","We don't have a category for shoots tied to metal wire extending 10-12"" so the closest is Garden Staple",Y,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,50,ND,NA,NA,"Reference shoot density range in 1995 is presented in Thom et al. 2012, the range is 30-70 shoots per m2, so took the average of the range=50 shoots/m10",1990,April-May,Spring,5,"approximately 2, 4, 16, 27, 40, 50, and 62 months",27,ND,0,Transplanted in ponds that were between 1 and 7 cm deep (intertidal seagrass),ND,ND,"50-150 shoots per plot, spaced where bundles of 10 were spaced 10-20 cm apart",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Similarity between transplanted and reference habitats,NA,Y,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,Did not measure environmental data but believe that failure at one plot (not reported/data unavailable) was due to dessiccation,ND,ND,ND,ND,"Since this project was started because of mitigation for Dungeness, Thom does explain (though did not measure) that the eelgrass habitat is critical for dungeness crab, salmon, etc. and that considering only the addition of shells (not shell+eelgrass) is to ignore benefits to animals besides dungeness",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Grays_Harbor_WA_Dungies_Mitig_1990,Grays_Harbor_WA_Dungies_Mitig_1990_CSS2,Grays_Harbor_WA_Dungies_Mitig_1990_CSS2_27mo,NA,"PNNL, US Army Corp",Grays Harbor,Transplanted into ponds that were 1-6 cm deep and created by the placing of shell (for Dungeness habitat creation by Army Corp),46.95,-124.05,WA,Zostera japonica,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,"Tied bundles of 10 shoots to metal wire using plastic twist tie (metal wire ~ = to garden staple); 50-150 shoots per plot, spaced where bundles of 10 were spaced 10-20 cm apart","We don't have a category for shoots tied to metal wire extending 10-12"" so the closest is Garden Staple",Y,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,50,ND,NA,NA,"Reference shoot density range in 1995 is presented in Thom et al. 2012, the range is 30-70 shoots per m2, so took the average of the range=50 shoots/m11",1990,April-May,Spring,5,"approximately 2, 4, 16, 27, 40, 50, and 62 months",27,ND,0,Transplanted in ponds that were between 1 and 7 cm deep (intertidal seagrass),ND,ND,"50-150 shoots per plot, spaced where bundles of 10 were spaced 10-20 cm apart",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Similarity between transplanted and reference habitats,NA,Y,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,Did not measure environmental data but believe that failure at one plot (not reported/data unavailable) was due to dessiccation,ND,ND,ND,ND,"Since this project was started because of mitigation for Dungeness, Thom does explain (though did not measure) that the eelgrass habitat is critical for dungeness crab, salmon, etc. and that considering only the addition of shells (not shell+eelgrass) is to ignore benefits to animals besides dungeness",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Grays_Harbor_WA_Dungies_Mitig_1990,Grays_Harbor_WA_Dungies_Mitig_1990_SCS1,Grays_Harbor_WA_Dungies_Mitig_1990_SCS1_27mo,NA,"PNNL, US Army Corp",Grays Harbor,Transplanted into ponds that were 1-6 cm deep and created by the placing of shell (for Dungeness habitat creation by Army Corp),46.95,-124.05,WA,Zostera japonica,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,"Tied bundles of 10 shoots to metal wire using plastic twist tie (metal wire ~ = to garden staple); 50-150 shoots per plot, spaced where bundles of 10 were spaced 10-20 cm apart","We don't have a category for shoots tied to metal wire extending 10-12"" so the closest is Garden Staple",Y,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,50,ND,NA,NA,"Reference shoot density range in 1995 is presented in Thom et al. 2012, the range is 30-70 shoots per m2, so took the average of the range=50 shoots/m12",1990,April-May,Spring,5,"approximately 2, 4, 16, 27, 40, 50, and 62 months",27,ND,0,Transplanted in ponds that were between 1 and 7 cm deep (intertidal seagrass),ND,ND,"50-150 shoots per plot, spaced where bundles of 10 were spaced 10-20 cm apart",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Similarity between transplanted and reference habitats,NA,Y,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,Did not measure environmental data but believe that failure at one plot (not reported/data unavailable) was due to dessiccation,ND,ND,ND,ND,"Since this project was started because of mitigation for Dungeness, Thom does explain (though did not measure) that the eelgrass habitat is critical for dungeness crab, salmon, etc. and that considering only the addition of shells (not shell+eelgrass) is to ignore benefits to animals besides dungeness",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Grays_Harbor_WA_Dungies_Mitig_1990,Grays_Harbor_WA_Dungies_Mitig_1990_SCS2,Grays_Harbor_WA_Dungies_Mitig_1990_SCS2_27mo,NA,"PNNL, US Army Corp",Grays Harbor,Transplanted into ponds that were 1-6 cm deep and created by the placing of shell (for Dungeness habitat creation by Army Corp),46.95,-124.05,WA,Zostera japonica,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,"Tied bundles of 10 shoots to metal wire using plastic twist tie (metal wire ~ = to garden staple); 50-150 shoots per plot, spaced where bundles of 10 were spaced 10-20 cm apart","We don't have a category for shoots tied to metal wire extending 10-12"" so the closest is Garden Staple",Y,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,50,ND,NA,NA,"Reference shoot density range in 1995 is presented in Thom et al. 2012, the range is 30-70 shoots per m2, so took the average of the range=50 shoots/m13",1990,April-May,Spring,5,"approximately 2, 4, 16, 27, 40, 50, and 62 months",27,ND,0,Transplanted in ponds that were between 1 and 7 cm deep (intertidal seagrass),ND,ND,"50-150 shoots per plot, spaced where bundles of 10 were spaced 10-20 cm apart",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Similarity between transplanted and reference habitats,NA,Y,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,Did not measure environmental data but believe that failure at one plot (not reported/data unavailable) was due to dessiccation,ND,ND,ND,ND,"Since this project was started because of mitigation for Dungeness, Thom does explain (though did not measure) that the eelgrass habitat is critical for dungeness crab, salmon, etc. and that considering only the addition of shells (not shell+eelgrass) is to ignore benefits to animals besides dungeness",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Grays_Harbor_WA_Dungies_Mitig_1990,Grays_Harbor_WA_Dungies_Mitig_1990_SCS3,Grays_Harbor_WA_Dungies_Mitig_1990_SCS3_27mo,NA,"PNNL, US Army Corp",Grays Harbor,Transplanted into ponds that were 1-6 cm deep and created by the placing of shell (for Dungeness habitat creation by Army Corp),46.95,-124.05,WA,Zostera japonica,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,"Tied bundles of 10 shoots to metal wire using plastic twist tie (metal wire ~ = to garden staple); 50-150 shoots per plot, spaced where bundles of 10 were spaced 10-20 cm apart","We don't have a category for shoots tied to metal wire extending 10-12"" so the closest is Garden Staple",Y,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,50,ND,NA,NA,"Reference shoot density range in 1995 is presented in Thom et al. 2012, the range is 30-70 shoots per m2, so took the average of the range=50 shoots/m14",1990,April-May,Spring,5,"approximately 2, 4, 16, 27, 40, 50, and 62 months",27,ND,0,Transplanted in ponds that were between 1 and 7 cm deep (intertidal seagrass),ND,ND,"50-150 shoots per plot, spaced where bundles of 10 were spaced 10-20 cm apart",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Similarity between transplanted and reference habitats,NA,Y,NA,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,Did not measure environmental data but believe that failure at one plot (not reported/data unavailable) was due to dessiccation,ND,ND,ND,ND,"Since this project was started because of mitigation for Dungeness, Thom does explain (though did not measure) that the eelgrass habitat is critical for dungeness crab, salmon, etc. and that considering only the addition of shells (not shell+eelgrass) is to ignore benefits to animals besides dungeness",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Grays_Harbor_WA_Dungies_Mitig_1990,Grays_Harbor_WA_Dungies_Mitig_1990_CSS1,Grays_Harbor_WA_Dungies_Mitig_1990_CSS1_62mo,NA,"PNNL, US Army Corp",Grays Harbor,Transplanted into ponds that were 1-6 cm deep and created by the placing of shell (for Dungeness habitat creation by Army Corp),46.95,-124.05,WA,Zostera japonica,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,"Tied bundles of 10 shoots to metal wire using plastic twist tie (metal wire ~ = to garden staple); 50-150 shoots per plot, spaced where bundles of 10 were spaced 10-20 cm apart","We don't have a category for shoots tied to metal wire extending 10-12"" so the closest is Garden Staple",Y,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,54,ND,NA,NA,"Reference shoot density range in 1995 is presented in Thom et al. 2012, the range is 30-70 shoots per m2, so took the average of the range=50 shoots/m14",1990,April-May,Spring,5,"approximately 2, 4, 16, 27, 40, 50, and 62 months",62,ND,0,Transplanted in ponds that were between 1 and 7 cm deep (intertidal seagrass),ND,ND,"50-150 shoots per plot, spaced where bundles of 10 were spaced 10-20 cm apart",ND,ND,ND,80,ND,ND,NA,Similarity between transplanted and reference habitats,NA,Y,Based on Fig 2D Thom et al. 2012,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,Did not measure environmental data but believe that failure at one plot (not reported/data unavailable) was due to dessiccation,ND,ND,ND,ND,"Since this project was started because of mitigation for Dungeness, Thom does explain (though did not measure) that the eelgrass habitat is critical for dungeness crab, salmon, etc. and that considering only the addition of shells (not shell+eelgrass) is to ignore benefits to animals besides dungeness",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Grays_Harbor_WA_Dungies_Mitig_1990,Grays_Harbor_WA_Dungies_Mitig_1990_CSS2,Grays_Harbor_WA_Dungies_Mitig_1990_CSS2_62mo,NA,"PNNL, US Army Corp",Grays Harbor,Transplanted into ponds that were 1-6 cm deep and created by the placing of shell (for Dungeness habitat creation by Army Corp),46.95,-124.05,WA,Zostera japonica,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,"Tied bundles of 10 shoots to metal wire using plastic twist tie (metal wire ~ = to garden staple); 50-150 shoots per plot, spaced where bundles of 10 were spaced 10-20 cm apart","We don't have a category for shoots tied to metal wire extending 10-12"" so the closest is Garden Staple",Y,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,70,ND,NA,NA,"Reference shoot density range in 1995 is presented in Thom et al. 2012, the range is 30-70 shoots per m2, so took the average of the range=50 shoots/m14",1990,April-May,Spring,5,"approximately 2, 4, 16, 27, 40, 50, and 62 months",62,ND,0,Transplanted in ponds that were between 1 and 7 cm deep (intertidal seagrass),ND,ND,"50-150 shoots per plot, spaced where bundles of 10 were spaced 10-20 cm apart",ND,ND,ND,0,ND,ND,NA,Similarity between transplanted and reference habitats,NA,N,Based on Fig 2D Thom et al. 2013,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,Did not measure environmental data but believe that failure at one plot (not reported/data unavailable) was due to dessiccation,ND,ND,ND,ND,"Since this project was started because of mitigation for Dungeness, Thom does explain (though did not measure) that the eelgrass habitat is critical for dungeness crab, salmon, etc. and that considering only the addition of shells (not shell+eelgrass) is to ignore benefits to animals besides dungeness",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Grays_Harbor_WA_Dungies_Mitig_1990,Grays_Harbor_WA_Dungies_Mitig_1990_SCS1,Grays_Harbor_WA_Dungies_Mitig_1990_SCS1_62mo,NA,"PNNL, US Army Corp",Grays Harbor,Transplanted into ponds that were 1-6 cm deep and created by the placing of shell (for Dungeness habitat creation by Army Corp),46.95,-124.05,WA,Zostera japonica,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,"Tied bundles of 10 shoots to metal wire using plastic twist tie (metal wire ~ = to garden staple); 50-150 shoots per plot, spaced where bundles of 10 were spaced 10-20 cm apart","We don't have a category for shoots tied to metal wire extending 10-12"" so the closest is Garden Staple",Y,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,50,ND,NA,NA,"Reference shoot density range in 1995 is presented in Thom et al. 2012, the range is 30-70 shoots per m2, so took the average of the range=50 shoots/m14",1990,April-May,Spring,5,"approximately 2, 4, 16, 27, 40, 50, and 62 months",62,ND,0,Transplanted in ponds that were between 1 and 7 cm deep (intertidal seagrass),ND,ND,"50-150 shoots per plot, spaced where bundles of 10 were spaced 10-20 cm apart",ND,ND,ND,45,ND,ND,NA,Similarity between transplanted and reference habitats,NA,Y,Based on Fig 2D Thom et al. 2014,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,Did not measure environmental data but believe that failure at one plot (not reported/data unavailable) was due to dessiccation,ND,ND,ND,ND,"Since this project was started because of mitigation for Dungeness, Thom does explain (though did not measure) that the eelgrass habitat is critical for dungeness crab, salmon, etc. and that considering only the addition of shells (not shell+eelgrass) is to ignore benefits to animals besides dungeness",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Grays_Harbor_WA_Dungies_Mitig_1990,Grays_Harbor_WA_Dungies_Mitig_1990_SCS2,Grays_Harbor_WA_Dungies_Mitig_1990_SCS2_62mo,NA,"PNNL, US Army Corp",Grays Harbor,Transplanted into ponds that were 1-6 cm deep and created by the placing of shell (for Dungeness habitat creation by Army Corp),46.95,-124.05,WA,Zostera japonica,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,"Tied bundles of 10 shoots to metal wire using plastic twist tie (metal wire ~ = to garden staple); 50-150 shoots per plot, spaced where bundles of 10 were spaced 10-20 cm apart","We don't have a category for shoots tied to metal wire extending 10-12"" so the closest is Garden Staple",Y,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,32,ND,NA,NA,"Reference shoot density range in 1995 is presented in Thom et al. 2012, the range is 30-70 shoots per m2, so took the average of the range=50 shoots/m14",1990,April-May,Spring,5,"approximately 2, 4, 16, 27, 40, 50, and 62 months",62,ND,0,Transplanted in ponds that were between 1 and 7 cm deep (intertidal seagrass),ND,ND,"50-150 shoots per plot, spaced where bundles of 10 were spaced 10-20 cm apart",ND,ND,ND,82,ND,ND,NA,Similarity between transplanted and reference habitats,NA,Y,Based on Fig 2D Thom et al. 2015,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,Did not measure environmental data but believe that failure at one plot (not reported/data unavailable) was due to dessiccation,ND,ND,ND,ND,"Since this project was started because of mitigation for Dungeness, Thom does explain (though did not measure) that the eelgrass habitat is critical for dungeness crab, salmon, etc. and that considering only the addition of shells (not shell+eelgrass) is to ignore benefits to animals besides dungeness",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Grays_Harbor_WA_Dungies_Mitig_1990,Grays_Harbor_WA_Dungies_Mitig_1990_SCS3,Grays_Harbor_WA_Dungies_Mitig_1990_SCS3_62mo,NA,"PNNL, US Army Corp",Grays Harbor,Transplanted into ponds that were 1-6 cm deep and created by the placing of shell (for Dungeness habitat creation by Army Corp),46.95,-124.05,WA,Zostera japonica,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,"Tied bundles of 10 shoots to metal wire using plastic twist tie (metal wire ~ = to garden staple); 50-150 shoots per plot, spaced where bundles of 10 were spaced 10-20 cm apart","We don't have a category for shoots tied to metal wire extending 10-12"" so the closest is Garden Staple",Y,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,68,ND,NA,NA,"Reference shoot density range in 1995 is presented in Thom et al. 2012, the range is 30-70 shoots per m2, so took the average of the range=50 shoots/m14",1990,April-May,Spring,5,"approximately 2, 4, 16, 27, 40, 50, and 62 months",62,ND,0,Transplanted in ponds that were between 1 and 7 cm deep (intertidal seagrass),ND,ND,"50-150 shoots per plot, spaced where bundles of 10 were spaced 10-20 cm apart",ND,ND,ND,62,ND,ND,NA,Similarity between transplanted and reference habitats,NA,Y,Based on Fig 2D Thom et al. 2016,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,Did not measure environmental data but believe that failure at one plot (not reported/data unavailable) was due to dessiccation,ND,ND,ND,ND,"Since this project was started because of mitigation for Dungeness, Thom does explain (though did not measure) that the eelgrass habitat is critical for dungeness crab, salmon, etc. and that considering only the addition of shells (not shell+eelgrass) is to ignore benefits to animals besides dungeness",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Grays_Harbor_WA_Dungies_Mitig_1990,Grays_Harbor_WA_Dungies_Mitig_1990_SCS4,Grays_Harbor_WA_Dungies_Mitig_1990_SCS4_62mo,NA,"PNNL, US Army Corp",Grays Harbor,Transplanted into ponds that were 1-6 cm deep and created by the placing of shell (for Dungeness habitat creation by Army Corp),46.95,-124.05,WA,Zostera japonica,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,"Tied bundles of 10 shoots to metal wire using plastic twist tie (metal wire ~ = to garden staple); 50-150 shoots per plot, spaced where bundles of 10 were spaced 10-20 cm apart","We don't have a category for shoots tied to metal wire extending 10-12"" so the closest is Garden Staple",Y,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,53,ND,NA,NA,"Reference shoot density range in 1995 is presented in Thom et al. 2012, the range is 30-70 shoots per m2, so took the average of the range=50 shoots/m14",1990,April-May,Spring,5,"approximately 2, 4, 16, 27, 40, 50, and 62 months",62,ND,0,Transplanted in ponds that were between 1 and 7 cm deep (intertidal seagrass),ND,ND,"50-150 shoots per plot, spaced where bundles of 10 were spaced 10-20 cm apart",ND,ND,ND,42,ND,ND,NA,Similarity between transplanted and reference habitats,NA,Y,Based on Fig 2D Thom et al. 2017,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,Did not measure environmental data but believe that failure at one plot (not reported/data unavailable) was due to dessiccation,ND,ND,ND,ND,"Since this project was started because of mitigation for Dungeness, Thom does explain (though did not measure) that the eelgrass habitat is critical for dungeness crab, salmon, etc. and that considering only the addition of shells (not shell+eelgrass) is to ignore benefits to animals besides dungeness",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Eagle_Harbor_WA_1998,Eagle_Harbor_WA_1998,Eagle_Harbor_WA_1998_12mo,NA,"PNNL, WSDOT",Puget Sound,NA,47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,ND,Mitigation,Active,N,"Popsicle stick, Garden Staple",4 shoots and associated rhizomes attached by wire twist-ties to an anchor--some used turf staples others used tonque depressors,At time of transplanting there was a dense layer of drift macroalgae (60% coverage of site) so they had to make clearings for plantings,Y,"Donor material was collected from area adjacent to Clinton Ferry terminal that was to be covered in 1999 by new dock, when harvesting donor material, they collected placed shoots in flowing seawater system at Battelle Marine Sciences Lab",ND,ND,142,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Reference site at Wing Point had medium grained sand, high faunal diversity, low macroalgal cover, and was a patchy, but robust bed. There was Smithora on blades but it was not overgrown",1998,September-October,Fall,2,quarterly,12,ND,-3.5,between -2 and -5 ft MLLW,ND,ND,10000,2530,0,1.05,0.019,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation plan criteria (not stated) for eelgrass cover and shoot density,N,N,"They conducted quarterly assessments 3 of which were qualitative (not included in database) and one that was quantitative; Conducted a pilot restoration to test whether shoots would survive (1997) before doing full restoration, macroalgal bloom smothered transplants and persisted for over 12 months",N,Y,N,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,N,"Conducted site assessment study in 1997 and a pilot transplanting study, there were no issues with macroalgae during pilot",ND,ND,ND,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Eagle_Harbor_WA_1998,Eagle_Harbor_WA_1998,Eagle_Harbor_WA_1998_24mo,NA,"PNNL, WSDOT",Puget Sound,NA,47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,ND,Mitigation,Active,Y,"Popsicle stick, Garden Staple",4 shoots and associated rhizomes attached by wire twist-ties to an anchor--some used turf staples others used tonque depressors,"Added 4m2 of eelgrass in 2000, total of 220 shoots; At time of transplanting there was a dense layer of drift macroalgae (60% coverage of site) so they had to make clearings for plantings",Y,"Donor material was collected from area adjacent to Clinton Ferry terminal that was to be covered in 1999 by new dock, when harvesting donor material, they collected placed shoots in flowing seawater system at Battelle Marine Sciences Lab",ND,ND,142,ND,129,ND,NA,NA,"Reference site at Wing Point had medium grained sand, high faunal diversity, low macroalgal cover, and was a patchy, but robust bed. There was Smithora on blades but it was not overgrown",1998,September-October,Fall,2,quarterly,24,ND,-3.5,between -2 and -5 ft MLLW,ND,ND,10000,2530,0,1.05,0,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation plan criteria (not stated) for eelgrass cover and shoot density,N,N,"They conducted quarterly assessments 3 of which were qualitative (not included in database) and one that was quantitative; Conducted a pilot restoration to test whether shoots would survive (1997) before doing full restoration, macroalgal bloom smothered transplants and persisted for over 12 months",N,Y,N,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,N,"Conducted site assessment study in 1997 and a pilot transplanting study, there were no issues with macroalgae during pilot",ND,ND,ND,ND,N,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotA,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotA_yr1,NA,"PNNL, WA Dept of Transportation",Puget Sound,"Clinton, Washington along open nearshore beach on Whidbey Island",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,threaded 4 shoots per staple,"Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,"Harvested from donor bed, raised material at PNNL tanks and transplanted from tanks (lab-raised)",ND,ND,64.8,ND,10,ND,NA,NA,"Variable, interannual changes--natural meadows were hit hard by winter storms, but typically recovered",1996,ND,ND,10,annually,12,3.2,-10.5,"depth was reported in 2008 Clinton Monitoring Report and in Thom et al. 2012, incomplete data from the monitoring report was filled in based on Thom et al. 2012",ND,ND,ND,297,ND,20,14,ND,ND,NA,Comparable performance between transplant and reference plots; Meeting mitigation ratio (not explicitly stated in pub),NA,Y,"Data pulled from figures in Thom et al. 2012 Estuaries and Coasts, they recorded epiphytic loads and shoot and rhizome biomass but it was summarized in a way that was not compatible with our database (i.e. summarized across all plots). Similarly, they measured shoot lengths but since this isn't a priority and we are nearing our deadline--I have omitted that data for now, we can return back to it and populate as we see fit. ",N,Y,N,N,Y,N,N,N,N,storm intensity and frequency,NA,Y,Y,ND,Salmonid prey species (epifauna/infauna),NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotA,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotA_yr2,NA,"PNNL, WA Dept of Transportation",Puget Sound,"Clinton, Washington along open nearshore beach on Whidbey Island",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,threaded 4 shoots per staple,"Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,"Harvested from donor bed, raised material at PNNL tanks and transplanted from tanks (lab-raised)",ND,ND,64.8,ND,52,ND,NA,NA,"Variable, interannual changes--natural meadows were hit hard by winter storms, but typically recovered",1996,ND,ND,10,annually,24,3.2,-10.5,"depth was reported in 2008 Clinton Monitoring Report and in Thom et al. 2012, incomplete data from the monitoring report was filled in based on Thom et al. 2013",ND,ND,ND,297,ND,20,4,ND,ND,NA,Comparable performance between transplant and reference plots; Meeting mitigation ratio (not explicitly stated in pub),NA,N,"Data pulled from figures in Thom et al. 2012 Estuaries and Coasts, they recorded epiphytic loads and shoot and rhizome biomass but it was summarized in a way that was not compatible with our database (i.e. summarized across all plots). Similarly, they measured shoot lengths but since this isn't a priority and we are nearing our deadline--I have omitted that data for now, we can return back to it and populate as we see fit. ",N,Y,N,N,Y,N,N,N,N,storm intensity and frequency,NA,Y,Y,ND,Salmonid prey species (epifauna/infauna),NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotA,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotA_yr3,NA,"PNNL, WA Dept of Transportation",Puget Sound,"Clinton, Washington along open nearshore beach on Whidbey Island",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,threaded 4 shoots per staple,"Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,"Harvested from donor bed, raised material at PNNL tanks and transplanted from tanks (lab-raised)",ND,ND,64.8,ND,11,ND,NA,NA,"Variable, interannual changes--natural meadows were hit hard by winter storms, but typically recovered",1996,ND,ND,10,annually,36,3.2,-10.5,"depth was reported in 2008 Clinton Monitoring Report and in Thom et al. 2012, incomplete data from the monitoring report was filled in based on Thom et al. 2014",ND,ND,ND,297,ND,20,3,ND,ND,NA,Comparable performance between transplant and reference plots; Meeting mitigation ratio (not explicitly stated in pub),NA,N,"Data pulled from figures in Thom et al. 2012 Estuaries and Coasts, they recorded epiphytic loads and shoot and rhizome biomass but it was summarized in a way that was not compatible with our database (i.e. summarized across all plots). Similarly, they measured shoot lengths but since this isn't a priority and we are nearing our deadline--I have omitted that data for now, we can return back to it and populate as we see fit. ",N,Y,N,N,Y,N,N,N,N,storm intensity and frequency,NA,Y,Y,ND,Salmonid prey species (epifauna/infauna),NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotA,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotA_yr4,NA,"PNNL, WA Dept of Transportation",Puget Sound,"Clinton, Washington along open nearshore beach on Whidbey Island",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,threaded 4 shoots per staple,"Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,"Harvested from donor bed, raised material at PNNL tanks and transplanted from tanks (lab-raised)",ND,ND,64.8,ND,16,ND,NA,NA,"Variable, interannual changes--natural meadows were hit hard by winter storms, but typically recovered",1996,ND,ND,10,annually,48,3.2,-10.5,"depth was reported in 2008 Clinton Monitoring Report and in Thom et al. 2012, incomplete data from the monitoring report was filled in based on Thom et al. 2015",ND,ND,ND,297,ND,20,8,ND,ND,NA,Comparable performance between transplant and reference plots; Meeting mitigation ratio (not explicitly stated in pub),NA,N,"Data pulled from figures in Thom et al. 2012 Estuaries and Coasts, they recorded epiphytic loads and shoot and rhizome biomass but it was summarized in a way that was not compatible with our database (i.e. summarized across all plots). Similarly, they measured shoot lengths but since this isn't a priority and we are nearing our deadline--I have omitted that data for now, we can return back to it and populate as we see fit. ",N,Y,N,N,Y,N,N,N,N,storm intensity and frequency,NA,Y,Y,ND,Salmonid prey species (epifauna/infauna),NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotA,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotA_yr5,NA,"PNNL, WA Dept of Transportation",Puget Sound,"Clinton, Washington along open nearshore beach on Whidbey Island",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,threaded 4 shoots per staple,"Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,"Harvested from donor bed, raised material at PNNL tanks and transplanted from tanks (lab-raised)",ND,ND,64.8,ND,30,ND,NA,NA,"Variable, interannual changes--natural meadows were hit hard by winter storms, but typically recovered",1996,ND,ND,10,annually,60,3.2,-10.5,"depth was reported in 2008 Clinton Monitoring Report and in Thom et al. 2012, incomplete data from the monitoring report was filled in based on Thom et al. 2016",ND,ND,ND,297,ND,20,8,ND,ND,NA,Comparable performance between transplant and reference plots; Meeting mitigation ratio (not explicitly stated in pub),NA,N,"Data pulled from figures in Thom et al. 2012 Estuaries and Coasts, they recorded epiphytic loads and shoot and rhizome biomass but it was summarized in a way that was not compatible with our database (i.e. summarized across all plots). Similarly, they measured shoot lengths but since this isn't a priority and we are nearing our deadline--I have omitted that data for now, we can return back to it and populate as we see fit. ",N,Y,N,N,Y,N,N,N,N,storm intensity and frequency,NA,Y,Y,ND,Salmonid prey species (epifauna/infauna),NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotA,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotA_yr6,NA,"PNNL, WA Dept of Transportation",Puget Sound,"Clinton, Washington along open nearshore beach on Whidbey Island",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,threaded 4 shoots per staple,"Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,"Harvested from donor bed, raised material at PNNL tanks and transplanted from tanks (lab-raised)",ND,ND,64.8,ND,27,ND,NA,NA,"Variable, interannual changes--natural meadows were hit hard by winter storms, but typically recovered",1996,ND,ND,10,annually,72,3.2,-10.5,"depth was reported in 2008 Clinton Monitoring Report and in Thom et al. 2012, incomplete data from the monitoring report was filled in based on Thom et al. 2017",ND,ND,ND,297,ND,20,15,ND,ND,NA,Comparable performance between transplant and reference plots; Meeting mitigation ratio (not explicitly stated in pub),NA,N,"Data pulled from figures in Thom et al. 2012 Estuaries and Coasts, they recorded epiphytic loads and shoot and rhizome biomass but it was summarized in a way that was not compatible with our database (i.e. summarized across all plots). Similarly, they measured shoot lengths but since this isn't a priority and we are nearing our deadline--I have omitted that data for now, we can return back to it and populate as we see fit. ",N,Y,N,N,Y,N,N,N,N,storm intensity and frequency,NA,Y,Y,ND,Salmonid prey species (epifauna/infauna),NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotA,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotA_yr7,NA,"PNNL, WA Dept of Transportation",Puget Sound,"Clinton, Washington along open nearshore beach on Whidbey Island",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,threaded 4 shoots per staple,"Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,"Harvested from donor bed, raised material at PNNL tanks and transplanted from tanks (lab-raised)",ND,ND,64.8,ND,63,ND,NA,NA,"Variable, interannual changes--natural meadows were hit hard by winter storms, but typically recovered",1996,ND,ND,10,annually,84,3.2,-10.5,"depth was reported in 2008 Clinton Monitoring Report and in Thom et al. 2012, incomplete data from the monitoring report was filled in based on Thom et al. 2018",ND,ND,ND,297,ND,20,9,ND,ND,NA,Comparable performance between transplant and reference plots; Meeting mitigation ratio (not explicitly stated in pub),NA,N,"Data pulled from figures in Thom et al. 2012 Estuaries and Coasts, they recorded epiphytic loads and shoot and rhizome biomass but it was summarized in a way that was not compatible with our database (i.e. summarized across all plots). Similarly, they measured shoot lengths but since this isn't a priority and we are nearing our deadline--I have omitted that data for now, we can return back to it and populate as we see fit. ",N,Y,N,N,Y,N,N,N,N,storm intensity and frequency,NA,Y,Y,ND,Salmonid prey species (epifauna/infauna),NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotA,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotA_yr8,NA,"PNNL, WA Dept of Transportation",Puget Sound,"Clinton, Washington along open nearshore beach on Whidbey Island",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,threaded 4 shoots per staple,"Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,"Harvested from donor bed, raised material at PNNL tanks and transplanted from tanks (lab-raised)",ND,ND,64.8,ND,54,ND,NA,NA,"Variable, interannual changes--natural meadows were hit hard by winter storms, but typically recovered",1996,ND,ND,10,annually,96,3.2,-10.5,"depth was reported in 2008 Clinton Monitoring Report and in Thom et al. 2012, incomplete data from the monitoring report was filled in based on Thom et al. 2019",ND,ND,ND,297,ND,20,10,ND,ND,NA,Comparable performance between transplant and reference plots; Meeting mitigation ratio (not explicitly stated in pub),NA,N,"Data pulled from figures in Thom et al. 2012 Estuaries and Coasts, they recorded epiphytic loads and shoot and rhizome biomass but it was summarized in a way that was not compatible with our database (i.e. summarized across all plots). Similarly, they measured shoot lengths but since this isn't a priority and we are nearing our deadline--I have omitted that data for now, we can return back to it and populate as we see fit. ",N,Y,N,N,Y,N,N,N,N,storm intensity and frequency,NA,Y,Y,ND,Salmonid prey species (epifauna/infauna),NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotA,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotA_yr9,NA,"PNNL, WA Dept of Transportation",Puget Sound,"Clinton, Washington along open nearshore beach on Whidbey Island",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,threaded 4 shoots per staple,"Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,"Harvested from donor bed, raised material at PNNL tanks and transplanted from tanks (lab-raised)",ND,ND,64.8,ND,72,ND,NA,NA,"Variable, interannual changes--natural meadows were hit hard by winter storms, but typically recovered",1996,ND,ND,10,annually,108,3.2,-10.5,"depth was reported in 2008 Clinton Monitoring Report and in Thom et al. 2012, incomplete data from the monitoring report was filled in based on Thom et al. 2020",ND,ND,ND,297,ND,20,1,ND,ND,NA,Comparable performance between transplant and reference plots; Meeting mitigation ratio (not explicitly stated in pub),NA,N,"Data pulled from figures in Thom et al. 2012 Estuaries and Coasts, they recorded epiphytic loads and shoot and rhizome biomass but it was summarized in a way that was not compatible with our database (i.e. summarized across all plots). Similarly, they measured shoot lengths but since this isn't a priority and we are nearing our deadline--I have omitted that data for now, we can return back to it and populate as we see fit. ",N,Y,N,N,Y,N,N,N,N,storm intensity and frequency,NA,Y,Y,ND,Salmonid prey species (epifauna/infauna),NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotA,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotA_yr10,NA,"PNNL, WA Dept of Transportation",Puget Sound,"Clinton, Washington along open nearshore beach on Whidbey Island",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,threaded 4 shoots per staple,"Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,"Harvested from donor bed, raised material at PNNL tanks and transplanted from tanks (lab-raised)",ND,ND,64.8,ND,4,ND,NA,NA,"Variable, interannual changes--natural meadows were hit hard by winter storms, but typically recovered",1996,ND,ND,10,annually,120,3.2,-10.5,"depth was reported in 2008 Clinton Monitoring Report and in Thom et al. 2012, incomplete data from the monitoring report was filled in based on Thom et al. 2021",ND,ND,ND,297,ND,20,0.1,ND,ND,NA,Comparable performance between transplant and reference plots; Meeting mitigation ratio (not explicitly stated in pub),NA,N,"Shoot density grabbed from Table 4 in 2006 report, they recorded epiphytic loads and shoot and rhizome biomass but it was summarized in a way that was not compatible with our database (i.e. summarized across all plots). Similarly, they measured shoot lengths but since this isn't a priority and we are nearing our deadline--I have omitted that data for now, we can return back to it and populate as we see fit. ",N,Y,N,N,Y,N,N,N,N,storm intensity and frequency,NA,Y,Y,ND,Salmonid prey species (epifauna/infauna),NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotB,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotB_yr1,NA,"PNNL, WA Dept of Transportation",Puget Sound,"Clinton, Washington along open nearshore beach on Whidbey Island",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,threaded 4 shoots per staple,"Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,"Harvested from donor bed, raised material at PNNL tanks and transplanted from tanks (lab-raised)",ND,ND,64.8,ND,52,ND,NA,NA,"Variable, interannual changes--natural meadows were hit hard by winter storms, but typically recovered",1996,ND,ND,10,annually,12,3.2,-3,"depth was reported in 2008 Clinton Monitoring Report and in Thom et al. 2012, incomplete data from the monitoring report was filled in based on Thom et al. 2022",ND,ND,ND,18,ND,20,16,ND,ND,NA,Comparable performance between transplant and reference plots; Meeting mitigation ratio (not explicitly stated in pub),NA,N,"Data pulled from figures in Thom et al. 2012 Estuaries and Coasts, they recorded epiphytic loads and shoot and rhizome biomass but it was summarized in a way that was not compatible with our database (i.e. summarized across all plots). Similarly, they measured shoot lengths but since this isn't a priority and we are nearing our deadline--I have omitted that data for now, we can return back to it and populate as we see fit. ",N,Y,N,N,Y,N,N,N,N,storm intensity and frequency,NA,Y,Y,ND,Salmonid prey species (epifauna/infauna),NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotB,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotB_yr2,NA,"PNNL, WA Dept of Transportation",Puget Sound,"Clinton, Washington along open nearshore beach on Whidbey Island",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,threaded 4 shoots per staple,"Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,"Harvested from donor bed, raised material at PNNL tanks and transplanted from tanks (lab-raised)",ND,ND,64.8,ND,150,ND,NA,NA,"Variable, interannual changes--natural meadows were hit hard by winter storms, but typically recovered",1996,ND,ND,10,annually,24,3.2,-3,"depth was reported in 2008 Clinton Monitoring Report and in Thom et al. 2012, incomplete data from the monitoring report was filled in based on Thom et al. 2023",ND,ND,ND,18,ND,20,85,ND,ND,NA,Comparable performance between transplant and reference plots; Meeting mitigation ratio (not explicitly stated in pub),NA,N,"Data pulled from figures in Thom et al. 2012 Estuaries and Coasts, they recorded epiphytic loads and shoot and rhizome biomass but it was summarized in a way that was not compatible with our database (i.e. summarized across all plots). Similarly, they measured shoot lengths but since this isn't a priority and we are nearing our deadline--I have omitted that data for now, we can return back to it and populate as we see fit. ",N,Y,N,N,Y,N,N,N,N,storm intensity and frequency,NA,Y,Y,ND,Salmonid prey species (epifauna/infauna),NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotB,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotB_yr3,NA,"PNNL, WA Dept of Transportation",Puget Sound,"Clinton, Washington along open nearshore beach on Whidbey Island",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,threaded 4 shoots per staple,"Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,"Harvested from donor bed, raised material at PNNL tanks and transplanted from tanks (lab-raised)",ND,ND,64.8,ND,154,ND,NA,NA,"Variable, interannual changes--natural meadows were hit hard by winter storms, but typically recovered",1996,ND,ND,10,annually,36,3.2,-3,"depth was reported in 2008 Clinton Monitoring Report and in Thom et al. 2012, incomplete data from the monitoring report was filled in based on Thom et al. 2024",ND,ND,ND,18,ND,20,60,ND,ND,NA,Comparable performance between transplant and reference plots; Meeting mitigation ratio (not explicitly stated in pub),NA,N,"Data pulled from figures in Thom et al. 2012 Estuaries and Coasts, they recorded epiphytic loads and shoot and rhizome biomass but it was summarized in a way that was not compatible with our database (i.e. summarized across all plots). Similarly, they measured shoot lengths but since this isn't a priority and we are nearing our deadline--I have omitted that data for now, we can return back to it and populate as we see fit. ",N,Y,N,N,Y,N,N,N,N,storm intensity and frequency,NA,Y,Y,ND,Salmonid prey species (epifauna/infauna),NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotB,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotB_yr4,NA,"PNNL, WA Dept of Transportation",Puget Sound,"Clinton, Washington along open nearshore beach on Whidbey Island",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,threaded 4 shoots per staple,"Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,"Harvested from donor bed, raised material at PNNL tanks and transplanted from tanks (lab-raised)",ND,ND,64.8,ND,179,ND,NA,NA,"Variable, interannual changes--natural meadows were hit hard by winter storms, but typically recovered",1996,ND,ND,10,annually,48,3.2,-3,"depth was reported in 2008 Clinton Monitoring Report and in Thom et al. 2012, incomplete data from the monitoring report was filled in based on Thom et al. 2025",ND,ND,ND,18,ND,20,45,ND,ND,NA,Comparable performance between transplant and reference plots; Meeting mitigation ratio (not explicitly stated in pub),NA,N,"Data pulled from figures in Thom et al. 2012 Estuaries and Coasts, they recorded epiphytic loads and shoot and rhizome biomass but it was summarized in a way that was not compatible with our database (i.e. summarized across all plots). Similarly, they measured shoot lengths but since this isn't a priority and we are nearing our deadline--I have omitted that data for now, we can return back to it and populate as we see fit. ",N,Y,N,N,Y,N,N,N,N,storm intensity and frequency,NA,Y,Y,ND,Salmonid prey species (epifauna/infauna),NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotB,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotB_yr5,NA,"PNNL, WA Dept of Transportation",Puget Sound,"Clinton, Washington along open nearshore beach on Whidbey Island",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,threaded 4 shoots per staple,"Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,"Harvested from donor bed, raised material at PNNL tanks and transplanted from tanks (lab-raised)",ND,ND,64.8,ND,153,ND,NA,NA,"Variable, interannual changes--natural meadows were hit hard by winter storms, but typically recovered",1996,ND,ND,10,annually,60,3.2,-3,"depth was reported in 2008 Clinton Monitoring Report and in Thom et al. 2012, incomplete data from the monitoring report was filled in based on Thom et al. 2026",ND,ND,ND,18,ND,20,120,ND,ND,NA,Comparable performance between transplant and reference plots; Meeting mitigation ratio (not explicitly stated in pub),NA,Y,"Data pulled from figures in Thom et al. 2012 Estuaries and Coasts, they recorded epiphytic loads and shoot and rhizome biomass but it was summarized in a way that was not compatible with our database (i.e. summarized across all plots). Similarly, they measured shoot lengths but since this isn't a priority and we are nearing our deadline--I have omitted that data for now, we can return back to it and populate as we see fit. ",N,Y,N,N,Y,N,N,N,N,storm intensity and frequency,NA,Y,Y,ND,Salmonid prey species (epifauna/infauna),NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotB,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotB_yr6,NA,"PNNL, WA Dept of Transportation",Puget Sound,"Clinton, Washington along open nearshore beach on Whidbey Island",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,threaded 4 shoots per staple,"Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,"Harvested from donor bed, raised material at PNNL tanks and transplanted from tanks (lab-raised)",ND,ND,64.8,ND,133,ND,NA,NA,"Variable, interannual changes--natural meadows were hit hard by winter storms, but typically recovered",1996,ND,ND,10,annually,72,3.2,-3,"depth was reported in 2008 Clinton Monitoring Report and in Thom et al. 2012, incomplete data from the monitoring report was filled in based on Thom et al. 2027",ND,ND,ND,18,ND,20,142,ND,ND,NA,Comparable performance between transplant and reference plots; Meeting mitigation ratio (not explicitly stated in pub),NA,Y,"Data pulled from figures in Thom et al. 2012 Estuaries and Coasts, they recorded epiphytic loads and shoot and rhizome biomass but it was summarized in a way that was not compatible with our database (i.e. summarized across all plots). Similarly, they measured shoot lengths but since this isn't a priority and we are nearing our deadline--I have omitted that data for now, we can return back to it and populate as we see fit. ",N,Y,N,N,Y,N,N,N,N,storm intensity and frequency,NA,Y,Y,ND,Salmonid prey species (epifauna/infauna),NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotB,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotB_yr7,NA,"PNNL, WA Dept of Transportation",Puget Sound,"Clinton, Washington along open nearshore beach on Whidbey Island",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,threaded 4 shoots per staple,"Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,"Harvested from donor bed, raised material at PNNL tanks and transplanted from tanks (lab-raised)",ND,ND,64.8,ND,214,ND,NA,NA,"Variable, interannual changes--natural meadows were hit hard by winter storms, but typically recovered",1996,ND,ND,10,annually,84,3.2,-3,"depth was reported in 2008 Clinton Monitoring Report and in Thom et al. 2012, incomplete data from the monitoring report was filled in based on Thom et al. 2028",ND,ND,ND,18,ND,20,168,ND,ND,NA,Comparable performance between transplant and reference plots; Meeting mitigation ratio (not explicitly stated in pub),NA,Y,"Data pulled from figures in Thom et al. 2012 Estuaries and Coasts, they recorded epiphytic loads and shoot and rhizome biomass but it was summarized in a way that was not compatible with our database (i.e. summarized across all plots). Similarly, they measured shoot lengths but since this isn't a priority and we are nearing our deadline--I have omitted that data for now, we can return back to it and populate as we see fit. ",N,Y,N,N,Y,N,N,N,N,storm intensity and frequency,NA,Y,Y,ND,Salmonid prey species (epifauna/infauna),NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotB,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotB_yr8,NA,"PNNL, WA Dept of Transportation",Puget Sound,"Clinton, Washington along open nearshore beach on Whidbey Island",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,threaded 4 shoots per staple,"Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,"Harvested from donor bed, raised material at PNNL tanks and transplanted from tanks (lab-raised)",ND,ND,64.8,ND,276,ND,NA,NA,"Variable, interannual changes--natural meadows were hit hard by winter storms, but typically recovered",1996,ND,ND,10,annually,96,3.2,-3,"depth was reported in 2008 Clinton Monitoring Report and in Thom et al. 2012, incomplete data from the monitoring report was filled in based on Thom et al. 2029",ND,ND,ND,18,ND,20,94,ND,ND,NA,Comparable performance between transplant and reference plots; Meeting mitigation ratio (not explicitly stated in pub),NA,N,"Data pulled from figures in Thom et al. 2012 Estuaries and Coasts, they recorded epiphytic loads and shoot and rhizome biomass but it was summarized in a way that was not compatible with our database (i.e. summarized across all plots). Similarly, they measured shoot lengths but since this isn't a priority and we are nearing our deadline--I have omitted that data for now, we can return back to it and populate as we see fit. ",N,Y,N,N,Y,N,N,N,N,storm intensity and frequency,NA,Y,Y,ND,Salmonid prey species (epifauna/infauna),NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotB,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotB_yr9,NA,"PNNL, WA Dept of Transportation",Puget Sound,"Clinton, Washington along open nearshore beach on Whidbey Island",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,threaded 4 shoots per staple,"Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,"Harvested from donor bed, raised material at PNNL tanks and transplanted from tanks (lab-raised)",ND,ND,64.8,ND,285,ND,NA,NA,"Variable, interannual changes--natural meadows were hit hard by winter storms, but typically recovered",1996,ND,ND,10,annually,108,3.2,-3,"depth was reported in 2008 Clinton Monitoring Report and in Thom et al. 2012, incomplete data from the monitoring report was filled in based on Thom et al. 2030",ND,ND,ND,18,ND,20,200,ND,ND,NA,Comparable performance between transplant and reference plots; Meeting mitigation ratio (not explicitly stated in pub),NA,N,"Data pulled from figures in Thom et al. 2012 Estuaries and Coasts, they recorded epiphytic loads and shoot and rhizome biomass but it was summarized in a way that was not compatible with our database (i.e. summarized across all plots). Similarly, they measured shoot lengths but since this isn't a priority and we are nearing our deadline--I have omitted that data for now, we can return back to it and populate as we see fit. ",N,Y,N,N,Y,N,N,N,N,storm intensity and frequency,NA,Y,Y,ND,Salmonid prey species (epifauna/infauna),NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotB,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotB_yr10,NA,"PNNL, WA Dept of Transportation",Puget Sound,"Clinton, Washington along open nearshore beach on Whidbey Island",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,threaded 4 shoots per staple,"Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,"Harvested from donor bed, raised material at PNNL tanks and transplanted from tanks (lab-raised)",ND,ND,64.8,ND,194.9,ND,NA,NA,"Variable, interannual changes--natural meadows were hit hard by winter storms, but typically recovered",1996,ND,ND,10,annually,120,3.2,-3,"depth was reported in 2008 Clinton Monitoring Report and in Thom et al. 2012, incomplete data from the monitoring report was filled in based on Thom et al. 2031",ND,ND,ND,18,ND,20,211.2,ND,ND,NA,Comparable performance between transplant and reference plots; Meeting mitigation ratio (not explicitly stated in pub),NA,Y,"Shoot density grabbed from Table 4 in 2006 report, they recorded epiphytic loads and shoot and rhizome biomass but it was summarized in a way that was not compatible with our database (i.e. summarized across all plots). Similarly, they measured shoot lengths but since this isn't a priority and we are nearing our deadline--I have omitted that data for now, we can return back to it and populate as we see fit. ",N,Y,N,N,Y,N,N,N,N,storm intensity and frequency,NA,Y,Y,ND,Salmonid prey species (epifauna/infauna),NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Clinton_Ferry_WA_2001,Clinton_Ferry_WA_2001_PlotF,Clinton_Ferry_WA_2001_PlotF_y4,NA,"PNNL, WA Dept of Transportation",Puget Sound,"Clinton, Washington along open nearshore beach on Whidbey Island",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,threaded 4 shoots per staple,"Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,"Harvested from donor bed, raised material at PNNL tanks and transplanted from tanks (lab-raised)",ND,ND,64.8,ND,8.3,ND,NA,NA,"Variable, interannual changes--natural meadows were hit hard by winter storms, but typically recovered",2001,ND,ND,7,annually,12,3.2,-1.6,"depth was reported in 2008 Clinton Monitoring Report and in Thom et al. 2012, incomplete data from the monitoring report was filled in based on Thom et al. 2032",ND,ND,ND,70,ND,20,2.8,ND,ND,NA,Comparable performance between transplant and reference plots; Meeting mitigation ratio (not explicitly stated in pub),NA,N,"Shoot density grabbed from Table 4 in 2006 report, they recorded epiphytic loads and shoot and rhizome biomass but it was summarized in a way that was not compatible with our database (i.e. summarized across all plots). Similarly, they measured shoot lengths but since this isn't a priority and we are nearing our deadline--I have omitted that data for now, we can return back to it and populate as we see fit. ",N,Y,N,N,Y,N,N,N,N,storm intensity and frequency,NA,Y,Y,ND,Salmonid prey species (epifauna/infauna),NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Clinton_Ferry_WA_2001,Clinton_Ferry_WA_2001_PlotD,Clinton_Ferry_WA_2001_PlotD_y1,NA,"PNNL, WA Dept of Transportation",Puget Sound,"Clinton, Washington along open nearshore beach on Whidbey Island",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,threaded 4 shoots per staple,"Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,"Harvested from donor bed, raised material at PNNL tanks and transplanted from tanks (lab-raised)",ND,ND,64.8,ND,164,ND,NA,NA,"Variable, interannual changes--natural meadows were hit hard by winter storms, but typically recovered",2001,ND,ND,7,annually,12,3.2,-1.6,"depth was reported in 2008 Clinton Monitoring Report and in Thom et al. 2012, incomplete data from the monitoring report was filled in based on Thom et al. 2033",ND,ND,ND,20,ND,20,31,ND,ND,NA,Comparable performance between transplant and reference plots; Meeting mitigation ratio (not explicitly stated in pub),NA,N,"Data pulled from figures in Thom et al. 2012 Estuaries and Coasts, they recorded epiphytic loads and shoot and rhizome biomass but it was summarized in a way that was not compatible with our database (i.e. summarized across all plots). Similarly, they measured shoot lengths but since this isn't a priority and we are nearing our deadline--I have omitted that data for now, we can return back to it and populate as we see fit. ",N,Y,N,N,Y,N,N,N,N,storm intensity and frequency,NA,Y,Y,ND,Salmonid prey species (epifauna/infauna),NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Clinton_Ferry_WA_2001,Clinton_Ferry_WA_2001_PlotD,Clinton_Ferry_WA_2001_PlotD_y2,NA,"PNNL, WA Dept of Transportation",Puget Sound,"Clinton, Washington along open nearshore beach on Whidbey Island",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,threaded 4 shoots per staple,"Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,"Harvested from donor bed, raised material at PNNL tanks and transplanted from tanks (lab-raised)",ND,ND,64.8,ND,187,ND,NA,NA,"Variable, interannual changes--natural meadows were hit hard by winter storms, but typically recovered",2001,ND,ND,7,annually,24,3.2,-1.6,"depth was reported in 2008 Clinton Monitoring Report and in Thom et al. 2012, incomplete data from the monitoring report was filled in based on Thom et al. 2034",ND,ND,ND,20,ND,20,12,ND,ND,NA,Comparable performance between transplant and reference plots; Meeting mitigation ratio (not explicitly stated in pub),NA,N,"Data pulled from figures in Thom et al. 2012 Estuaries and Coasts, they recorded epiphytic loads and shoot and rhizome biomass but it was summarized in a way that was not compatible with our database (i.e. summarized across all plots). Similarly, they measured shoot lengths but since this isn't a priority and we are nearing our deadline--I have omitted that data for now, we can return back to it and populate as we see fit. ",N,Y,N,N,Y,N,N,N,N,storm intensity and frequency,NA,Y,Y,ND,Salmonid prey species (epifauna/infauna),NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Clinton_Ferry_WA_2001,Clinton_Ferry_WA_2001_PlotD,Clinton_Ferry_WA_2001_PlotD_y3,NA,"PNNL, WA Dept of Transportation",Puget Sound,"Clinton, Washington along open nearshore beach on Whidbey Island",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,threaded 4 shoots per staple,"Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,"Harvested from donor bed, raised material at PNNL tanks and transplanted from tanks (lab-raised)",ND,ND,64.8,ND,220,ND,NA,NA,"Variable, interannual changes--natural meadows were hit hard by winter storms, but typically recovered",2001,ND,ND,7,annually,36,3.2,-1.6,"depth was reported in 2008 Clinton Monitoring Report and in Thom et al. 2012, incomplete data from the monitoring report was filled in based on Thom et al. 2035",ND,ND,ND,20,ND,20,11,ND,ND,NA,Comparable performance between transplant and reference plots; Meeting mitigation ratio (not explicitly stated in pub),NA,N,"Data pulled from figures in Thom et al. 2012 Estuaries and Coasts, they recorded epiphytic loads and shoot and rhizome biomass but it was summarized in a way that was not compatible with our database (i.e. summarized across all plots). Similarly, they measured shoot lengths but since this isn't a priority and we are nearing our deadline--I have omitted that data for now, we can return back to it and populate as we see fit. ",N,Y,N,N,Y,N,N,N,N,storm intensity and frequency,NA,Y,Y,ND,Salmonid prey species (epifauna/infauna),NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Clinton_Ferry_WA_2001,Clinton_Ferry_WA_2001_PlotD,Clinton_Ferry_WA_2001_PlotD_y4,NA,"PNNL, WA Dept of Transportation",Puget Sound,"Clinton, Washington along open nearshore beach on Whidbey Island",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,threaded 4 shoots per staple,"Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,"Harvested from donor bed, raised material at PNNL tanks and transplanted from tanks (lab-raised)",ND,ND,64.8,ND,98.3,ND,NA,NA,"Variable, interannual changes--natural meadows were hit hard by winter storms, but typically recovered",2001,ND,ND,7,annually,48,3.2,-1.6,"depth was reported in 2008 Clinton Monitoring Report and in Thom et al. 2012, incomplete data from the monitoring report was filled in based on Thom et al. 2036",ND,ND,ND,20,ND,20,0,ND,ND,NA,Comparable performance between transplant and reference plots; Meeting mitigation ratio (not explicitly stated in pub),NA,N,"Data pulled from figures in Thom et al. 2012 Estuaries and Coasts, they recorded epiphytic loads and shoot and rhizome biomass but it was summarized in a way that was not compatible with our database (i.e. summarized across all plots). Similarly, they measured shoot lengths but since this isn't a priority and we are nearing our deadline--I have omitted that data for now, we can return back to it and populate as we see fit. ",N,Y,N,N,Y,N,N,N,N,storm intensity and frequency,NA,Y,Y,ND,Salmonid prey species (epifauna/infauna),NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Clinton_Ferry_WA_2001,Clinton_Ferry_WA_2001_PlotD,Clinton_Ferry_WA_2001_PlotD_y5,NA,"PNNL, WA Dept of Transportation",Puget Sound,"Clinton, Washington along open nearshore beach on Whidbey Island",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,threaded 4 shoots per staple,"Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,"Harvested from donor bed, raised material at PNNL tanks and transplanted from tanks (lab-raised)",ND,ND,64.8,ND,110,ND,NA,NA,"Variable, interannual changes--natural meadows were hit hard by winter storms, but typically recovered",2001,ND,ND,7,annually,60,3.2,-1.6,"depth was reported in 2008 Clinton Monitoring Report and in Thom et al. 2012, incomplete data from the monitoring report was filled in based on Thom et al. 2037",ND,ND,ND,20,ND,20,13,ND,ND,NA,Comparable performance between transplant and reference plots; Meeting mitigation ratio (not explicitly stated in pub),NA,N,"Data pulled from figures in Thom et al. 2012 Estuaries and Coasts, they recorded epiphytic loads and shoot and rhizome biomass but it was summarized in a way that was not compatible with our database (i.e. summarized across all plots). Similarly, they measured shoot lengths but since this isn't a priority and we are nearing our deadline--I have omitted that data for now, we can return back to it and populate as we see fit. ",N,Y,N,N,Y,N,N,N,N,storm intensity and frequency,NA,Y,Y,ND,Salmonid prey species (epifauna/infauna),NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Clinton_Ferry_WA_2001,Clinton_Ferry_WA_2001_PlotD,Clinton_Ferry_WA_2001_PlotD_y6,NA,"PNNL, WA Dept of Transportation",Puget Sound,"Clinton, Washington along open nearshore beach on Whidbey Island",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,threaded 4 shoots per staple,"Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,"Harvested from donor bed, raised material at PNNL tanks and transplanted from tanks (lab-raised)",ND,ND,64.8,ND,77,ND,NA,NA,"Variable, interannual changes--natural meadows were hit hard by winter storms, but typically recovered",2001,ND,ND,7,annually,72,3.2,-1.6,"depth was reported in 2008 Clinton Monitoring Report and in Thom et al. 2012, incomplete data from the monitoring report was filled in based on Thom et al. 2038",ND,ND,ND,20,ND,20,14,ND,ND,NA,Comparable performance between transplant and reference plots; Meeting mitigation ratio (not explicitly stated in pub),NA,N,"Data pulled from figures in Thom et al. 2012 Estuaries and Coasts, they recorded epiphytic loads and shoot and rhizome biomass but it was summarized in a way that was not compatible with our database (i.e. summarized across all plots). Similarly, they measured shoot lengths but since this isn't a priority and we are nearing our deadline--I have omitted that data for now, we can return back to it and populate as we see fit. ",N,Y,N,N,Y,N,N,N,N,storm intensity and frequency,NA,Y,Y,ND,Salmonid prey species (epifauna/infauna),NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Clinton_Ferry_WA_2001,Clinton_Ferry_WA_2001_PlotD,Clinton_Ferry_WA_2001_PlotD_y7,NA,"PNNL, WA Dept of Transportation",Puget Sound,"Clinton, Washington along open nearshore beach on Whidbey Island",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,threaded 4 shoots per staple,"Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,"Harvested from donor bed, raised material at PNNL tanks and transplanted from tanks (lab-raised)",ND,ND,64.8,ND,78,ND,NA,NA,"Variable, interannual changes--natural meadows were hit hard by winter storms, but typically recovered",2001,ND,ND,7,annually,84,3.2,-1.6,"depth was reported in 2008 Clinton Monitoring Report and in Thom et al. 2012, incomplete data from the monitoring report was filled in based on Thom et al. 2039",ND,ND,ND,20,ND,20,16,ND,ND,NA,Comparable performance between transplant and reference plots; Meeting mitigation ratio (not explicitly stated in pub),NA,N,"Data pulled from figures in Thom et al. 2012 Estuaries and Coasts, they recorded epiphytic loads and shoot and rhizome biomass but it was summarized in a way that was not compatible with our database (i.e. summarized across all plots). Similarly, they measured shoot lengths but since this isn't a priority and we are nearing our deadline--I have omitted that data for now, we can return back to it and populate as we see fit. ",N,Y,N,N,Y,N,N,N,N,storm intensity and frequency,NA,Y,Y,ND,Salmonid prey species (epifauna/infauna),NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotG,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotG_y1,NA,"PNNL, WA Dept of Transportation",Puget Sound,"Clinton, Washington along open nearshore beach on Whidbey Island",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,threaded 4 shoots per staple,"Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,"Harvested from donor bed, raised material at PNNL tanks and transplanted from tanks (lab-raised)",ND,ND,64.8,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Variable, interannual changes--natural meadows were hit hard by winter storms, but typically recovered",1996,ND,ND,10,annually,12,3.2,-2.3,"depth was reported in 2008 Clinton Monitoring Report and in Thom et al. 2012, incomplete data from the monitoring report was filled in based on Thom et al. 2040",ND,ND,ND,167,ND,20,18,ND,ND,NA,Comparable performance between transplant and reference plots; Meeting mitigation ratio (not explicitly stated in pub),NA,ND,"No data on Reference Plot for this corresponding plot and monitoring date = ""ND"" ; Data pulled from figures in Thom et al. 2012 Estuaries and Coasts, they recorded epiphytic loads and shoot and rhizome biomass but it was summarized in a way that was not compatible with our database (i.e. summarized across all plots). Similarly, they measured shoot lengths but since this isn't a priority and we are nearing our deadline--I have omitted that data for now, we can return back to it and populate as we see fit. ",N,Y,N,N,Y,N,N,N,N,storm intensity and frequency,NA,Y,Y,ND,Salmonid prey species (epifauna/infauna),NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotG,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotG_y2,NA,"PNNL, WA Dept of Transportation",Puget Sound,"Clinton, Washington along open nearshore beach on Whidbey Island",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,threaded 4 shoots per staple,"Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,"Harvested from donor bed, raised material at PNNL tanks and transplanted from tanks (lab-raised)",ND,ND,64.8,ND,34,ND,NA,NA,"Variable, interannual changes--natural meadows were hit hard by winter storms, but typically recovered",1996,ND,ND,10,annually,24,3.2,-2.3,"depth was reported in 2008 Clinton Monitoring Report and in Thom et al. 2012, incomplete data from the monitoring report was filled in based on Thom et al. 2041",ND,ND,ND,167,ND,20,0,ND,ND,NA,Comparable performance between transplant and reference plots; Meeting mitigation ratio (not explicitly stated in pub),NA,N,Shoot density grabbed from Table 4 in 2006 report,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,N,N,N,storm intensity and frequency,NA,Y,Y,ND,Salmonid prey species (epifauna/infauna),NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotG,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotG_y3,NA,"PNNL, WA Dept of Transportation",Puget Sound,"Clinton, Washington along open nearshore beach on Whidbey Island",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,threaded 4 shoots per staple,"Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,"Harvested from donor bed, raised material at PNNL tanks and transplanted from tanks (lab-raised)",ND,ND,64.8,ND,22,ND,NA,NA,"Variable, interannual changes--natural meadows were hit hard by winter storms, but typically recovered",1996,ND,ND,10,annually,36,3.2,-2.3,"depth was reported in 2008 Clinton Monitoring Report and in Thom et al. 2012, incomplete data from the monitoring report was filled in based on Thom et al. 2042",ND,ND,ND,167,ND,20,6,ND,ND,NA,Comparable performance between transplant and reference plots; Meeting mitigation ratio (not explicitly stated in pub),NA,N,"Data pulled from figures in Thom et al. 2012 Estuaries and Coasts, they recorded epiphytic loads and shoot and rhizome biomass but it was summarized in a way that was not compatible with our database (i.e. summarized across all plots). Similarly, they measured shoot lengths but since this isn't a priority and we are nearing our deadline--I have omitted that data for now, we can return back to it and populate as we see fit. ",N,Y,N,N,Y,N,N,N,N,storm intensity and frequency,NA,Y,Y,ND,Salmonid prey species (epifauna/infauna),NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotG,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotG_y4,NA,"PNNL, WA Dept of Transportation",Puget Sound,"Clinton, Washington along open nearshore beach on Whidbey Island",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,threaded 4 shoots per staple,"Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,"Harvested from donor bed, raised material at PNNL tanks and transplanted from tanks (lab-raised)",ND,ND,64.8,ND,2,ND,NA,NA,"Variable, interannual changes--natural meadows were hit hard by winter storms, but typically recovered",1996,ND,ND,10,annually,48,3.2,-2.3,"depth was reported in 2008 Clinton Monitoring Report and in Thom et al. 2012, incomplete data from the monitoring report was filled in based on Thom et al. 2043",ND,ND,ND,167,ND,20,14,ND,ND,NA,Comparable performance between transplant and reference plots; Meeting mitigation ratio (not explicitly stated in pub),NA,Y,"Data pulled from figures in Thom et al. 2012 Estuaries and Coasts, they recorded epiphytic loads and shoot and rhizome biomass but it was summarized in a way that was not compatible with our database (i.e. summarized across all plots). Similarly, they measured shoot lengths but since this isn't a priority and we are nearing our deadline--I have omitted that data for now, we can return back to it and populate as we see fit. ",N,Y,N,N,Y,N,N,N,N,storm intensity and frequency,NA,Y,Y,ND,Salmonid prey species (epifauna/infauna),NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotG,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotG_y5,NA,"PNNL, WA Dept of Transportation",Puget Sound,"Clinton, Washington along open nearshore beach on Whidbey Island",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,threaded 4 shoots per staple,"Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,"Harvested from donor bed, raised material at PNNL tanks and transplanted from tanks (lab-raised)",ND,ND,64.8,ND,8,ND,NA,NA,"Variable, interannual changes--natural meadows were hit hard by winter storms, but typically recovered",1996,ND,ND,10,annually,60,3.2,-2.3,"depth was reported in 2008 Clinton Monitoring Report and in Thom et al. 2012, incomplete data from the monitoring report was filled in based on Thom et al. 2044",ND,ND,ND,167,ND,20,67,ND,ND,NA,Comparable performance between transplant and reference plots; Meeting mitigation ratio (not explicitly stated in pub),NA,Y,"Data pulled from figures in Thom et al. 2012 Estuaries and Coasts, they recorded epiphytic loads and shoot and rhizome biomass but it was summarized in a way that was not compatible with our database (i.e. summarized across all plots). Similarly, they measured shoot lengths but since this isn't a priority and we are nearing our deadline--I have omitted that data for now, we can return back to it and populate as we see fit. ",N,Y,N,N,Y,N,N,N,N,storm intensity and frequency,NA,Y,Y,ND,Salmonid prey species (epifauna/infauna),NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotG,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotG_y6,NA,"PNNL, WA Dept of Transportation",Puget Sound,"Clinton, Washington along open nearshore beach on Whidbey Island",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,threaded 4 shoots per staple,"Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,"Harvested from donor bed, raised material at PNNL tanks and transplanted from tanks (lab-raised)",ND,ND,64.8,ND,11,ND,NA,NA,"Variable, interannual changes--natural meadows were hit hard by winter storms, but typically recovered",1996,ND,ND,10,annually,72,3.2,-2.3,"depth was reported in 2008 Clinton Monitoring Report and in Thom et al. 2012, incomplete data from the monitoring report was filled in based on Thom et al. 2045",ND,ND,ND,167,ND,20,100,ND,ND,NA,Comparable performance between transplant and reference plots; Meeting mitigation ratio (not explicitly stated in pub),NA,Y,"Data pulled from figures in Thom et al. 2012 Estuaries and Coasts, they recorded epiphytic loads and shoot and rhizome biomass but it was summarized in a way that was not compatible with our database (i.e. summarized across all plots). Similarly, they measured shoot lengths but since this isn't a priority and we are nearing our deadline--I have omitted that data for now, we can return back to it and populate as we see fit. ",N,Y,N,N,Y,N,N,N,N,storm intensity and frequency,NA,Y,Y,ND,Salmonid prey species (epifauna/infauna),NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotG,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotG_y7,NA,"PNNL, WA Dept of Transportation",Puget Sound,"Clinton, Washington along open nearshore beach on Whidbey Island",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,threaded 4 shoots per staple,"Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,"Harvested from donor bed, raised material at PNNL tanks and transplanted from tanks (lab-raised)",ND,ND,64.8,ND,82,ND,NA,NA,"Variable, interannual changes--natural meadows were hit hard by winter storms, but typically recovered",1996,ND,ND,10,annually,84,3.2,-2.3,"depth was reported in 2008 Clinton Monitoring Report and in Thom et al. 2012, incomplete data from the monitoring report was filled in based on Thom et al. 2046",ND,ND,ND,167,ND,20,154,ND,ND,NA,Comparable performance between transplant and reference plots; Meeting mitigation ratio (not explicitly stated in pub),NA,Y,"Data pulled from figures in Thom et al. 2012 Estuaries and Coasts, they recorded epiphytic loads and shoot and rhizome biomass but it was summarized in a way that was not compatible with our database (i.e. summarized across all plots). Similarly, they measured shoot lengths but since this isn't a priority and we are nearing our deadline--I have omitted that data for now, we can return back to it and populate as we see fit. ",N,Y,N,N,Y,N,N,N,N,storm intensity and frequency,NA,Y,Y,ND,Salmonid prey species (epifauna/infauna),NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotG,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotG_y8,NA,"PNNL, WA Dept of Transportation",Puget Sound,"Clinton, Washington along open nearshore beach on Whidbey Island",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,threaded 4 shoots per staple,"Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,"Harvested from donor bed, raised material at PNNL tanks and transplanted from tanks (lab-raised)",ND,ND,64.8,ND,34.3,ND,NA,NA,"Variable, interannual changes--natural meadows were hit hard by winter storms, but typically recovered",1996,ND,ND,10,annually,96,3.2,-2.3,"depth was reported in 2008 Clinton Monitoring Report and in Thom et al. 2012, incomplete data from the monitoring report was filled in based on Thom et al. 2047",ND,ND,ND,167,ND,20,232,ND,ND,NA,Comparable performance between transplant and reference plots; Meeting mitigation ratio (not explicitly stated in pub),NA,Y,"Data pulled from figures in Thom et al. 2012 Estuaries and Coasts, they recorded epiphytic loads and shoot and rhizome biomass but it was summarized in a way that was not compatible with our database (i.e. summarized across all plots). Similarly, they measured shoot lengths but since this isn't a priority and we are nearing our deadline--I have omitted that data for now, we can return back to it and populate as we see fit. ",N,Y,N,N,Y,N,N,N,N,storm intensity and frequency,NA,Y,Y,ND,Salmonid prey species (epifauna/infauna),NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotG,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotG_y9,NA,"PNNL, WA Dept of Transportation",Puget Sound,"Clinton, Washington along open nearshore beach on Whidbey Island",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,threaded 4 shoots per staple,"Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,"Harvested from donor bed, raised material at PNNL tanks and transplanted from tanks (lab-raised)",ND,ND,64.8,ND,94,ND,NA,NA,"Variable, interannual changes--natural meadows were hit hard by winter storms, but typically recovered",1996,ND,ND,10,annually,108,3.2,-2.3,"depth was reported in 2008 Clinton Monitoring Report and in Thom et al. 2012, incomplete data from the monitoring report was filled in based on Thom et al. 2048",ND,ND,ND,167,ND,20,147,ND,ND,NA,Comparable performance between transplant and reference plots; Meeting mitigation ratio (not explicitly stated in pub),NA,Y,"Data pulled from figures in Thom et al. 2012 Estuaries and Coasts, they recorded epiphytic loads and shoot and rhizome biomass but it was summarized in a way that was not compatible with our database (i.e. summarized across all plots). Similarly, they measured shoot lengths but since this isn't a priority and we are nearing our deadline--I have omitted that data for now, we can return back to it and populate as we see fit. ",N,Y,N,N,Y,N,N,N,N,storm intensity and frequency,NA,Y,Y,ND,Salmonid prey species (epifauna/infauna),NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotG,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotG_y10,NA,"PNNL, WA Dept of Transportation",Puget Sound,"Clinton, Washington along open nearshore beach on Whidbey Island",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,threaded 4 shoots per staple,"Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,"Harvested from donor bed, raised material at PNNL tanks and transplanted from tanks (lab-raised)",ND,ND,64.8,ND,27,ND,NA,NA,"Variable, interannual changes--natural meadows were hit hard by winter storms, but typically recovered",1996,ND,ND,10,annually,120,3.2,-2.3,"depth was reported in 2008 Clinton Monitoring Report and in Thom et al. 2012, incomplete data from the monitoring report was filled in based on Thom et al. 2049",ND,ND,ND,167,ND,20,153,ND,ND,NA,Comparable performance between transplant and reference plots; Meeting mitigation ratio (not explicitly stated in pub),NA,Y,Shoot density grabbed from Table 4 in 2006 report,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,N,N,N,storm intensity and frequency,NA,Y,Y,ND,Salmonid prey species (epifauna/infauna),NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Clinton_Ferry_WA_2001,Clinton_Ferry_WA_2001_PlotH,Clinton_Ferry_WA_2001_PlotH_y4,NA,"PNNL, WA Dept of Transportation",Puget Sound,"Clinton, Washington along open nearshore beach on Whidbey Island",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,threaded 4 shoots per staple,"Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,"Harvested from donor bed, raised material at PNNL tanks and transplanted from tanks (lab-raised)",ND,ND,64.8,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Variable, interannual changes--natural meadows were hit hard by winter storms, but typically recovered",2001,ND,ND,7,annually,12,3.2,-8,"depth was reported in 2008 Clinton Monitoring Report and in Thom et al. 2012, incomplete data from the monitoring report was filled in based on Thom et al. 2050",ND,ND,ND,207,ND,20,7.6,ND,ND,NA,Comparable performance between transplant and reference plots; Meeting mitigation ratio (not explicitly stated in pub),NA,Y,Shoot density grabbed from Table 4 in 2006 report,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,N,N,N,storm intensity and frequency,NA,Y,Y,ND,Salmonid prey species (epifauna/infauna),NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotC,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotC_yr1,NA,"PNNL, WA Dept of Transportation",Puget Sound,"Clinton, Washington along open nearshore beach on Whidbey Island",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,threaded 4 shoots per staple,"Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,"Harvested from donor bed, raised material at PNNL tanks and transplanted from tanks (lab-raised)",ND,ND,64.8,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Variable, interannual changes--natural meadows were hit hard by winter storms, but typically recovered",1996,ND,ND,10,annually,12,3.2,-8.5,"depth was reported in 2008 Clinton Monitoring Report and in Thom et al. 2012, incomplete data from the monitoring report was filled in based on Thom et al. 2051",ND,ND,ND,47,ND,20,6.5,ND,ND,NA,Comparable performance between transplant and reference plots; Meeting mitigation ratio (not explicitly stated in pub),NA,Y,"Shoot density grabbed from figures using plot digitizer, not from raw data table",N,Y,N,N,Y,N,N,N,N,storm intensity and frequency,NA,Y,Y,ND,Salmonid prey species (epifauna/infauna),NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotC,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotC_yr2,NA,"PNNL, WA Dept of Transportation",Puget Sound,"Clinton, Washington along open nearshore beach on Whidbey Island",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,threaded 4 shoots per staple,"Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,"Harvested from donor bed, raised material at PNNL tanks and transplanted from tanks (lab-raised)",ND,ND,64.8,ND,62,ND,NA,NA,"Variable, interannual changes--natural meadows were hit hard by winter storms, but typically recovered",1996,ND,ND,10,annually,24,3.2,-8.5,"depth was reported in 2008 Clinton Monitoring Report and in Thom et al. 2012, incomplete data from the monitoring report was filled in based on Thom et al. 2052",ND,ND,ND,47,ND,20,40,ND,ND,NA,Comparable performance between transplant and reference plots; Meeting mitigation ratio (not explicitly stated in pub),NA,Y,"Shoot density grabbed from figures using plot digitizer, not from raw data table",N,Y,N,N,Y,N,N,N,N,storm intensity and frequency,NA,Y,Y,ND,Salmonid prey species (epifauna/infauna),NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotC,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotC_yr3,NA,"PNNL, WA Dept of Transportation",Puget Sound,"Clinton, Washington along open nearshore beach on Whidbey Island",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,threaded 4 shoots per staple,"Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,"Harvested from donor bed, raised material at PNNL tanks and transplanted from tanks (lab-raised)",ND,ND,64.8,ND,4,ND,NA,NA,"Variable, interannual changes--natural meadows were hit hard by winter storms, but typically recovered",1996,ND,ND,10,annually,36,3.2,-8.5,"depth was reported in 2008 Clinton Monitoring Report and in Thom et al. 2012, incomplete data from the monitoring report was filled in based on Thom et al. 2053",ND,ND,ND,47,ND,20,6.5,ND,ND,NA,Comparable performance between transplant and reference plots; Meeting mitigation ratio (not explicitly stated in pub),NA,Y,"Shoot density grabbed from figures using plot digitizer, not from raw data table",N,Y,N,N,Y,N,N,N,N,storm intensity and frequency,NA,Y,Y,ND,Salmonid prey species (epifauna/infauna),NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotC,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotC_yr4,NA,"PNNL, WA Dept of Transportation",Puget Sound,"Clinton, Washington along open nearshore beach on Whidbey Island",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,threaded 4 shoots per staple,"Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,"Harvested from donor bed, raised material at PNNL tanks and transplanted from tanks (lab-raised)",ND,ND,64.8,ND,45,ND,NA,NA,"Variable, interannual changes--natural meadows were hit hard by winter storms, but typically recovered",1996,ND,ND,10,annually,48,3.2,-8.5,"depth was reported in 2008 Clinton Monitoring Report and in Thom et al. 2012, incomplete data from the monitoring report was filled in based on Thom et al. 2054",ND,ND,ND,47,ND,20,5,ND,ND,NA,Comparable performance between transplant and reference plots; Meeting mitigation ratio (not explicitly stated in pub),NA,Y,"Shoot density grabbed from figures using plot digitizer, not from raw data table",N,Y,N,N,Y,N,N,N,N,storm intensity and frequency,NA,Y,Y,ND,Salmonid prey species (epifauna/infauna),NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotC,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotC_yr5,NA,"PNNL, WA Dept of Transportation",Puget Sound,"Clinton, Washington along open nearshore beach on Whidbey Island",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,threaded 4 shoots per staple,"Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,"Harvested from donor bed, raised material at PNNL tanks and transplanted from tanks (lab-raised)",ND,ND,64.8,ND,24,ND,NA,NA,"Variable, interannual changes--natural meadows were hit hard by winter storms, but typically recovered",1996,ND,ND,10,annually,60,3.2,-8.5,"depth was reported in 2008 Clinton Monitoring Report and in Thom et al. 2012, incomplete data from the monitoring report was filled in based on Thom et al. 2055",ND,ND,ND,47,ND,20,14,ND,ND,NA,Comparable performance between transplant and reference plots; Meeting mitigation ratio (not explicitly stated in pub),NA,Y,"Shoot density grabbed from figures using plot digitizer, not from raw data table",N,Y,N,N,Y,N,N,N,N,storm intensity and frequency,NA,Y,Y,ND,Salmonid prey species (epifauna/infauna),NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotC,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotC_yr6,NA,"PNNL, WA Dept of Transportation",Puget Sound,"Clinton, Washington along open nearshore beach on Whidbey Island",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,threaded 4 shoots per staple,"Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,"Harvested from donor bed, raised material at PNNL tanks and transplanted from tanks (lab-raised)",ND,ND,64.8,ND,45,ND,NA,NA,"Variable, interannual changes--natural meadows were hit hard by winter storms, but typically recovered",1996,ND,ND,10,annually,72,3.2,-8.5,"depth was reported in 2008 Clinton Monitoring Report and in Thom et al. 2012, incomplete data from the monitoring report was filled in based on Thom et al. 2056",ND,ND,ND,47,ND,20,21,ND,ND,NA,Comparable performance between transplant and reference plots; Meeting mitigation ratio (not explicitly stated in pub),NA,Y,"Shoot density grabbed from figures using plot digitizer, not from raw data table",N,Y,N,N,Y,N,N,N,N,storm intensity and frequency,NA,Y,Y,ND,Salmonid prey species (epifauna/infauna),NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotC,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotC_yr7,NA,"PNNL, WA Dept of Transportation",Puget Sound,"Clinton, Washington along open nearshore beach on Whidbey Island",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,threaded 4 shoots per staple,"Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,"Harvested from donor bed, raised material at PNNL tanks and transplanted from tanks (lab-raised)",ND,ND,64.8,ND,54.5,ND,NA,NA,"Variable, interannual changes--natural meadows were hit hard by winter storms, but typically recovered",1996,ND,ND,10,annually,84,3.2,-8.5,"depth was reported in 2008 Clinton Monitoring Report and in Thom et al. 2012, incomplete data from the monitoring report was filled in based on Thom et al. 2057",ND,ND,ND,47,ND,20,45,ND,ND,NA,Comparable performance between transplant and reference plots; Meeting mitigation ratio (not explicitly stated in pub),NA,Y,"Shoot density grabbed from figures using plot digitizer, not from raw data table",N,Y,N,N,Y,N,N,N,N,storm intensity and frequency,NA,Y,Y,ND,Salmonid prey species (epifauna/infauna),NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotC,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotC_yr8,NA,"PNNL, WA Dept of Transportation",Puget Sound,"Clinton, Washington along open nearshore beach on Whidbey Island",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,threaded 4 shoots per staple,"Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,"Harvested from donor bed, raised material at PNNL tanks and transplanted from tanks (lab-raised)",ND,ND,64.8,ND,65,ND,NA,NA,"Variable, interannual changes--natural meadows were hit hard by winter storms, but typically recovered",1996,ND,ND,10,annually,96,3.2,-8.5,"depth was reported in 2008 Clinton Monitoring Report and in Thom et al. 2012, incomplete data from the monitoring report was filled in based on Thom et al. 2058",ND,ND,ND,47,ND,20,26,ND,ND,NA,Comparable performance between transplant and reference plots; Meeting mitigation ratio (not explicitly stated in pub),NA,Y,"Shoot density grabbed from figures using plot digitizer, not from raw data table",N,Y,N,N,Y,N,N,N,N,storm intensity and frequency,NA,Y,Y,ND,Salmonid prey species (epifauna/infauna),NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotC,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotC_yr9,NA,"PNNL, WA Dept of Transportation",Puget Sound,"Clinton, Washington along open nearshore beach on Whidbey Island",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,threaded 4 shoots per staple,"Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,"Harvested from donor bed, raised material at PNNL tanks and transplanted from tanks (lab-raised)",ND,ND,64.8,ND,124,ND,NA,NA,"Variable, interannual changes--natural meadows were hit hard by winter storms, but typically recovered",1996,ND,ND,10,annually,108,3.2,-8.5,"depth was reported in 2008 Clinton Monitoring Report and in Thom et al. 2012, incomplete data from the monitoring report was filled in based on Thom et al. 2059",ND,ND,ND,47,ND,20,75,ND,ND,NA,Comparable performance between transplant and reference plots; Meeting mitigation ratio (not explicitly stated in pub),NA,Y,"Shoot density grabbed from figures using plot digitizer, not from raw data table",N,Y,N,N,Y,N,N,N,N,storm intensity and frequency,NA,Y,Y,ND,Salmonid prey species (epifauna/infauna),NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotC,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotC_yr10,NA,"PNNL, WA Dept of Transportation",Puget Sound,"Clinton, Washington along open nearshore beach on Whidbey Island",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,threaded 4 shoots per staple,"Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,"Harvested from donor bed, raised material at PNNL tanks and transplanted from tanks (lab-raised)",ND,ND,64.8,ND,10,ND,NA,NA,"Variable, interannual changes--natural meadows were hit hard by winter storms, but typically recovered",1996,ND,ND,10,annually,120,3.2,-8.5,"depth was reported in 2008 Clinton Monitoring Report and in Thom et al. 2012, incomplete data from the monitoring report was filled in based on Thom et al. 2060",ND,ND,ND,47,ND,20,1.5,ND,ND,NA,Comparable performance between transplant and reference plots; Meeting mitigation ratio (not explicitly stated in pub),NA,Y,Shoot density reported in Table 4 of 2006 report,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,N,N,N,storm intensity and frequency,NA,Y,Y,ND,Salmonid prey species (epifauna/infauna),NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Clinton_Ferry_WA_2003,Clinton_Ferry_WA_2003_PlotI,Clinton_Ferry_WA_2003_PlotI_y2,NA,"PNNL, WA Dept of Transportation",Puget Sound,"Clinton, Washington along open nearshore beach on Whidbey Island",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,threaded 4 shoots per staple,"Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,"Harvested from donor bed, raised material at PNNL tanks and transplanted from tanks (lab-raised)",ND,ND,64.8,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Variable, interannual changes--natural meadows were hit hard by winter storms, but typically recovered",2003,ND,ND,3,annually,12,3.2,ND,"depth was reported in 2008 Clinton Monitoring Report and in Thom et al. 2012, incomplete data from the monitoring report was filled in based on Thom et al. 2061",ND,ND,ND,136,ND,20,2.9,ND,ND,NA,Comparable performance between transplant and reference plots; Meeting mitigation ratio (not explicitly stated in pub),NA,Y,Shoot density reported in Table 4 of 2006 report,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,N,N,N,storm intensity and frequency,NA,Y,Y,ND,Salmonid prey species (epifauna/infauna),NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Clinton_Ferry_WA_2003,Clinton_Ferry_WA_2003_PlotJ,Clinton_Ferry_WA_2003_PlotJ_y2,NA,"PNNL, WA Dept of Transportation",Puget Sound,"Clinton, Washington along open nearshore beach on Whidbey Island",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,threaded 4 shoots per staple,"Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,"Harvested from donor bed, raised material at PNNL tanks and transplanted from tanks (lab-raised)",ND,ND,64.8,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Variable, interannual changes--natural meadows were hit hard by winter storms, but typically recovered",2003,ND,ND,3,annually,12,3.2,ND,"depth was reported in 2008 Clinton Monitoring Report and in Thom et al. 2012, incomplete data from the monitoring report was filled in based on Thom et al. 2062",ND,ND,ND,441,ND,20,0.7,ND,ND,NA,Comparable performance between transplant and reference plots; Meeting mitigation ratio (not explicitly stated in pub),NA,Y,Shoot density reported in Table 4 of 2006 report,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,N,N,N,storm intensity and frequency,NA,Y,Y,ND,Salmonid prey species (epifauna/infauna),NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotEprime,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotEprime_y7,NA,"PNNL, WA Dept of Transportation",Puget Sound,"Clinton, Washington along open nearshore beach on Whidbey Island",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,threaded 4 shoots per staple,"Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,"Harvested from donor bed, raised material at PNNL tanks and transplanted from tanks (lab-raised)",ND,ND,64.8,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Variable, interannual changes--natural meadows were hit hard by winter storms, but typically recovered",2003,ND,ND,3,annually,12,3.2,-7.8,"depth was reported in 2008 Clinton Monitoring Report and in Thom et al. 2012, incomplete data from the monitoring report was filled in based on Thom et al. 2063",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,20,28.4,ND,ND,NA,Comparable performance between transplant and reference plots; Meeting mitigation ratio (not explicitly stated in pub),NA,Y,NA,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,N,N,N,storm intensity and frequency,NA,Y,Y,ND,Salmonid prey species (epifauna/infauna),NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotE,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotE_y1,NA,"PNNL, WA Dept of Transportation",Puget Sound,"Clinton, Washington along open nearshore beach on Whidbey Island",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,threaded 4 shoots per staple,"Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,"Harvested from donor bed, raised material at PNNL tanks and transplanted from tanks (lab-raised)",ND,ND,64.8,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Variable, interannual changes--natural meadows were hit hard by winter storms, but typically recovered",1996,ND,ND,10,annually,12,3.2,-7.8,"depth was reported in 2008 Clinton Monitoring Report and in Thom et al. 2012, incomplete data from the monitoring report was filled in based on Thom et al. 2064",ND,ND,ND,85,ND,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Comparable performance between transplant and reference plots; Meeting mitigation ratio (not explicitly stated in pub),NA,ND,"Data pulled from figures in Thom et al. 2012 Estuaries and Coasts, they recorded epiphytic loads and shoot and rhizome biomass but it was summarized in a way that was not compatible with our database (i.e. summarized across all plots). Similarly, they measured shoot lengths but since this isn't a priority and we are nearing our deadline--I have omitted that data for now, we can return back to it and populate as we see fit. ",N,Y,N,N,Y,N,N,N,N,storm intensity and frequency,NA,Y,Y,ND,Salmonid prey species (epifauna/infauna),NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotE,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotE_y2,NA,"PNNL, WA Dept of Transportation",Puget Sound,"Clinton, Washington along open nearshore beach on Whidbey Island",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,threaded 4 shoots per staple,"Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,"Harvested from donor bed, raised material at PNNL tanks and transplanted from tanks (lab-raised)",ND,ND,64.8,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Variable, interannual changes--natural meadows were hit hard by winter storms, but typically recovered",1996,ND,ND,10,annually,24,3.2,-7.8,"depth was reported in 2008 Clinton Monitoring Report and in Thom et al. 2012, incomplete data from the monitoring report was filled in based on Thom et al. 2065",ND,ND,ND,85,ND,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Comparable performance between transplant and reference plots; Meeting mitigation ratio (not explicitly stated in pub),NA,ND,"Data pulled from figures in Thom et al. 2012 Estuaries and Coasts, they recorded epiphytic loads and shoot and rhizome biomass but it was summarized in a way that was not compatible with our database (i.e. summarized across all plots). Similarly, they measured shoot lengths but since this isn't a priority and we are nearing our deadline--I have omitted that data for now, we can return back to it and populate as we see fit. ",N,Y,N,N,Y,N,N,N,N,storm intensity and frequency,NA,Y,Y,ND,Salmonid prey species (epifauna/infauna),NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotE,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotE_y3,NA,"PNNL, WA Dept of Transportation",Puget Sound,"Clinton, Washington along open nearshore beach on Whidbey Island",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,threaded 4 shoots per staple,"Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,"Harvested from donor bed, raised material at PNNL tanks and transplanted from tanks (lab-raised)",ND,ND,64.8,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Variable, interannual changes--natural meadows were hit hard by winter storms, but typically recovered",1996,ND,ND,10,annually,36,3.2,-7.8,"depth was reported in 2008 Clinton Monitoring Report and in Thom et al. 2012, incomplete data from the monitoring report was filled in based on Thom et al. 2066",ND,ND,ND,85,ND,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Comparable performance between transplant and reference plots; Meeting mitigation ratio (not explicitly stated in pub),NA,ND,"Data pulled from figures in Thom et al. 2012 Estuaries and Coasts, they recorded epiphytic loads and shoot and rhizome biomass but it was summarized in a way that was not compatible with our database (i.e. summarized across all plots). Similarly, they measured shoot lengths but since this isn't a priority and we are nearing our deadline--I have omitted that data for now, we can return back to it and populate as we see fit. ",N,Y,N,N,Y,N,N,N,N,storm intensity and frequency,NA,Y,Y,ND,Salmonid prey species (epifauna/infauna),NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotE,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotE_y4,NA,"PNNL, WA Dept of Transportation",Puget Sound,"Clinton, Washington along open nearshore beach on Whidbey Island",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,threaded 4 shoots per staple,"Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,"Harvested from donor bed, raised material at PNNL tanks and transplanted from tanks (lab-raised)",ND,ND,64.8,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Variable, interannual changes--natural meadows were hit hard by winter storms, but typically recovered",1996,ND,ND,10,annually,48,3.2,-7.8,"depth was reported in 2008 Clinton Monitoring Report and in Thom et al. 2012, incomplete data from the monitoring report was filled in based on Thom et al. 2067",ND,ND,ND,85,ND,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Comparable performance between transplant and reference plots; Meeting mitigation ratio (not explicitly stated in pub),NA,ND,"Data pulled from figures in Thom et al. 2012 Estuaries and Coasts, they recorded epiphytic loads and shoot and rhizome biomass but it was summarized in a way that was not compatible with our database (i.e. summarized across all plots). Similarly, they measured shoot lengths but since this isn't a priority and we are nearing our deadline--I have omitted that data for now, we can return back to it and populate as we see fit. ",N,Y,N,N,Y,N,N,N,N,storm intensity and frequency,NA,Y,Y,ND,Salmonid prey species (epifauna/infauna),NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotE,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotE_y5,NA,"PNNL, WA Dept of Transportation",Puget Sound,"Clinton, Washington along open nearshore beach on Whidbey Island",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,threaded 4 shoots per staple,"Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,"Harvested from donor bed, raised material at PNNL tanks and transplanted from tanks (lab-raised)",ND,ND,64.8,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Variable, interannual changes--natural meadows were hit hard by winter storms, but typically recovered",1996,ND,ND,10,annually,60,3.2,-7.8,"depth was reported in 2008 Clinton Monitoring Report and in Thom et al. 2012, incomplete data from the monitoring report was filled in based on Thom et al. 2068",ND,ND,ND,85,ND,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Comparable performance between transplant and reference plots; Meeting mitigation ratio (not explicitly stated in pub),NA,ND,"Data pulled from figures in Thom et al. 2012 Estuaries and Coasts, they recorded epiphytic loads and shoot and rhizome biomass but it was summarized in a way that was not compatible with our database (i.e. summarized across all plots). Similarly, they measured shoot lengths but since this isn't a priority and we are nearing our deadline--I have omitted that data for now, we can return back to it and populate as we see fit. ",N,Y,N,N,Y,N,N,N,N,storm intensity and frequency,NA,Y,Y,ND,Salmonid prey species (epifauna/infauna),NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotE,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotE_y6,NA,"PNNL, WA Dept of Transportation",Puget Sound,"Clinton, Washington along open nearshore beach on Whidbey Island",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,threaded 4 shoots per staple,"Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,"Harvested from donor bed, raised material at PNNL tanks and transplanted from tanks (lab-raised)",ND,ND,64.8,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Variable, interannual changes--natural meadows were hit hard by winter storms, but typically recovered",1996,ND,ND,10,annually,72,3.2,-7.8,"depth was reported in 2008 Clinton Monitoring Report and in Thom et al. 2012, incomplete data from the monitoring report was filled in based on Thom et al. 2069",ND,ND,ND,85,ND,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Comparable performance between transplant and reference plots; Meeting mitigation ratio (not explicitly stated in pub),NA,ND,"Data pulled from figures in Thom et al. 2012 Estuaries and Coasts, they recorded epiphytic loads and shoot and rhizome biomass but it was summarized in a way that was not compatible with our database (i.e. summarized across all plots). Similarly, they measured shoot lengths but since this isn't a priority and we are nearing our deadline--I have omitted that data for now, we can return back to it and populate as we see fit. ",N,Y,N,N,Y,N,N,N,N,storm intensity and frequency,NA,Y,Y,ND,Salmonid prey species (epifauna/infauna),NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotE,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotE_y7,NA,"PNNL, WA Dept of Transportation",Puget Sound,"Clinton, Washington along open nearshore beach on Whidbey Island",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,threaded 4 shoots per staple,"Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,"Harvested from donor bed, raised material at PNNL tanks and transplanted from tanks (lab-raised)",ND,ND,64.8,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Variable, interannual changes--natural meadows were hit hard by winter storms, but typically recovered",1996,ND,ND,10,annually,84,3.2,-7.8,"depth was reported in 2008 Clinton Monitoring Report and in Thom et al. 2012, incomplete data from the monitoring report was filled in based on Thom et al. 2070",ND,ND,ND,85,ND,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Comparable performance between transplant and reference plots; Meeting mitigation ratio (not explicitly stated in pub),NA,ND,"Data pulled from figures in Thom et al. 2012 Estuaries and Coasts, they recorded epiphytic loads and shoot and rhizome biomass but it was summarized in a way that was not compatible with our database (i.e. summarized across all plots). Similarly, they measured shoot lengths but since this isn't a priority and we are nearing our deadline--I have omitted that data for now, we can return back to it and populate as we see fit. ",N,Y,N,N,Y,N,N,N,N,storm intensity and frequency,NA,Y,Y,ND,Salmonid prey species (epifauna/infauna),NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotE,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotE_y8,NA,"PNNL, WA Dept of Transportation",Puget Sound,"Clinton, Washington along open nearshore beach on Whidbey Island",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,threaded 4 shoots per staple,"Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,"Harvested from donor bed, raised material at PNNL tanks and transplanted from tanks (lab-raised)",ND,ND,64.8,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,"Variable, interannual changes--natural meadows were hit hard by winter storms, but typically recovered",1996,ND,ND,10,annually,96,3.2,-7.8,"depth was reported in 2008 Clinton Monitoring Report and in Thom et al. 2012, incomplete data from the monitoring report was filled in based on Thom et al. 2071",ND,ND,ND,85,ND,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Comparable performance between transplant and reference plots; Meeting mitigation ratio (not explicitly stated in pub),NA,ND,"Data pulled from figures in Thom et al. 2012 Estuaries and Coasts, they recorded epiphytic loads and shoot and rhizome biomass but it was summarized in a way that was not compatible with our database (i.e. summarized across all plots). Similarly, they measured shoot lengths but since this isn't a priority and we are nearing our deadline--I have omitted that data for now, we can return back to it and populate as we see fit. ",N,Y,N,N,Y,N,N,N,N,storm intensity and frequency,NA,Y,Y,ND,Salmonid prey species (epifauna/infauna),NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotE,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotE_y9,NA,"PNNL, WA Dept of Transportation",Puget Sound,"Clinton, Washington along open nearshore beach on Whidbey Island",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,threaded 4 shoots per staple,"Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,"Harvested from donor bed, raised material at PNNL tanks and transplanted from tanks (lab-raised)",ND,ND,64.8,ND,68.8,ND,NA,NA,"Variable, interannual changes--natural meadows were hit hard by winter storms, but typically recovered",1996,ND,ND,10,annually,108,3.2,-7.8,"depth was reported in 2008 Clinton Monitoring Report and in Thom et al. 2012, incomplete data from the monitoring report was filled in based on Thom et al. 2072",ND,ND,ND,85,ND,20,36,ND,ND,NA,Comparable performance between transplant and reference plots; Meeting mitigation ratio (not explicitly stated in pub),NA,N,Shoot density reported in Table 4 of 2006 report--restored shoot density below reference,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,N,N,N,storm intensity and frequency,NA,Y,Y,ND,Salmonid prey species (epifauna/infauna),NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotE,Clinton_Ferry_WA_1996_PlotE_y10,NA,"PNNL, WA Dept of Transportation",Puget Sound,"Clinton, Washington along open nearshore beach on Whidbey Island",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,threaded 4 shoots per staple,"Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,"Harvested from donor bed, raised material at PNNL tanks and transplanted from tanks (lab-raised)",ND,ND,64.8,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,ND,1996,ND,ND,10,annually,120,3.2,-7.8,"depth was reported in 2008 Clinton Monitoring Report and in Thom et al. 2012, incomplete data from the monitoring report was filled in based on Thom et al. 2071",ND,ND,ND,85,ND,20,ND,ND,ND,NA,Comparable performance between transplant and reference plots; Meeting mitigation ratio (not explicitly stated in pub),NA,ND,NA,N,Y,N,N,Y,N,N,N,N,storm intensity and frequency,NA,Y,Y,ND,Salmonid prey species (epifauna/infauna),NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Judd_LowerColumbia_2009,Judd_LowerColumbia_2009_B3,Judd_LowerColumbia_2009_B3_12mo,Grey literature,NA,Columbia River,West Baker Bay,46.2,-124,WA,ND,Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,"Eelgrass is sorted and bundled using twist ties and staples, then placed on boards for divers to plant","Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,3 donor beds used,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,They say the monitored one but provide no data in the report,2008,June,Summer,1,12 mo,12,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,1225,49,ND,22.5,0,NA,ND,NA,Plot persistence (any level of survival),NA,N,""" Eelgrass was planted in a one-quarter-square meter of each square meter with 5 bundles containing 4-5 shoots each. Six bundles were used per one square meter at YoungÕs Bay. Planting resulted in an initial planting abundance of 1225 shoots per site, and 1250 at Trestle Bay."" - I took the median of the range provided here (22.5 shoots). (reporting quadrat density- not site planted density)",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,N,N,Water Velocity,"These were all measured before for site evaluation, not sure that they continued this monitoring during the actual year of restoration?",N,Y,Only studied ,Dungeness,"Quantitative- ""The intended experimental design compared utilization by crabs (measured by catch per unit effort, CPUE) and size of crabs at unvegetated, natural eelgrass, and transplanted eelgrass habitats. However, the eelgrass transplant treatments proved too small for adequate replication. We therefore primarily compared natural eelgrass and unvegetated treatments with traps in and surrounding one transplant site."" They could not (statistically) ""support the hypothesis of increased abundance of 0+ crab in subtidal eelgrass meadows compared to unvegetated sites"" -- no difference. ",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Judd_LowerColumbia_2009,Judd_LowerColumbia_2009_B1,Judd_LowerColumbia_2009_B1_12mo,Grey literature,NA,Columbia River,East Baker Bay,46.2,-124,WA,ND,Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,"Eelgrass is sorted and bundled using twist ties and staples, then placed on boards for divers to plant","Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,3 donor beds used,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,They say the monitored one but provide no data in the report,2008,June,Summer,1,12 mo,12,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,1225,49,ND,22.5,10.9,8.75,ND,NA,Plot persistence (any level of survival),NA,Y,""" Eelgrass was planted in a one-quarter-square meter of each square meter with 5 bundles containing 4-5 shoots each. Six bundles were used per one square meter at YoungÕs Bay. Planting resulted in an initial planting abundance of 1225 shoots per site, and 1250 at Trestle Bay."" - I took the median of the range provided here (22.5 shoots). (reporting quadrat density- not site planted density)",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,N,N,Water Velocity,"These were all measured before for site evaluation, not sure that they continued this monitoring during the actual year of restoration?",N,Y,Only studied ,Dungeness,"Quantitative- ""The intended experimental design compared utilization by crabs (measured by catch per unit effort, CPUE) and size of crabs at unvegetated, natural eelgrass, and transplanted eelgrass habitats. However, the eelgrass transplant treatments proved too small for adequate replication. We therefore primarily compared natural eelgrass and unvegetated treatments with traps in and surrounding one transplant site."" They could not (statistically) ""support the hypothesis of increased abundance of 0+ crab in subtidal eelgrass meadows compared to unvegetated sites"" -- no difference. ",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Judd_LowerColumbia_2009,Judd_LowerColumbia_2009_M1,Judd_LowerColumbia_2009_M1_12mo,Grey literature,NA,Columbia River,Trestle Bay,46.2,-124,WA,ND,Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,"Eelgrass is sorted and bundled using twist ties and staples, then placed on boards for divers to plant","Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,3 donor beds used,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,They say the monitored one but provide no data in the report,2008,June,Summer,1,12 mo,12,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,1225,49,ND,22.5,0,NA,ND,NA,Plot persistence (any level of survival),NA,N,""" Eelgrass was planted in a one-quarter-square meter of each square meter with 5 bundles containing 4-5 shoots each. Six bundles were used per one square meter at YoungÕs Bay. Planting resulted in an initial planting abundance of 1225 shoots per site, and 1250 at Trestle Bay."" - I took the median of the range provided here (22.5 shoots). (reporting quadrat density- not site planted density)",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,N,N,Water Velocity,"These were all measured before for site evaluation, not sure that they continued this monitoring during the actual year of restoration?",N,Y,Only studied ,Dungeness,"Quantitative- ""The intended experimental design compared utilization by crabs (measured by catch per unit effort, CPUE) and size of crabs at unvegetated, natural eelgrass, and transplanted eelgrass habitats. However, the eelgrass transplant treatments proved too small for adequate replication. We therefore primarily compared natural eelgrass and unvegetated treatments with traps in and surrounding one transplant site."" They could not (statistically) ""support the hypothesis of increased abundance of 0+ crab in subtidal eelgrass meadows compared to unvegetated sites"" -- no difference. ",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Judd_LowerColumbia_2009,Judd_LowerColumbia_2009_D1,Judd_LowerColumbia_2009_D1_12mo,Grey literature,NA,Columbia River,Desdemona Sands,46.2,-124,WA,ND,Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,"Eelgrass is sorted and bundled using twist ties and staples, then placed on boards for divers to plant","Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,3 donor beds used,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,They say the monitored one but provide no data in the report,2008,June,Summer,1,12 mo,12,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,1225,49,ND,22.5,0,NA,ND,NA,Plot persistence (any level of survival),NA,N,""" Eelgrass was planted in a one-quarter-square meter of each square meter with 5 bundles containing 4-5 shoots each. Six bundles were used per one square meter at YoungÕs Bay. Planting resulted in an initial planting abundance of 1225 shoots per site, and 1250 at Trestle Bay."" - I took the median of the range provided here (22.5 shoots). (reporting quadrat density- not site planted density)",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,N,N,Water Velocity,"These were all measured before for site evaluation, not sure that they continued this monitoring during the actual year of restoration?",N,Y,Only studied ,Dungeness,"Quantitative- ""The intended experimental design compared utilization by crabs (measured by catch per unit effort, CPUE) and size of crabs at unvegetated, natural eelgrass, and transplanted eelgrass habitats. However, the eelgrass transplant treatments proved too small for adequate replication. We therefore primarily compared natural eelgrass and unvegetated treatments with traps in and surrounding one transplant site."" They could not (statistically) ""support the hypothesis of increased abundance of 0+ crab in subtidal eelgrass meadows compared to unvegetated sites"" -- no difference. ",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Judd_LowerColumbia_2009,Judd_LowerColumbia_2009_Y2,Judd_LowerColumbia_2009_Y2_12mo,Grey literature,NA,Columbia River,Youngs Bay,46.2,-124,WA,ND,Y,Non-mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,"Eelgrass is sorted and bundled using twist ties and staples, then placed on boards for divers to plant","Details on methods given during interview, not reported in paper",Y,3 donor beds used,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,They say the monitored one but provide no data in the report,2008,June,Summer,1,12 mo,12,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,1250,49,ND,26.5,133.1,42.8,ND,NA,Plot persistence (any level of survival),NA,Y,""" Eelgrass was planted in a one-quarter-square meter of each square meter with 5 bundles containing 4-5 shoots each. Six bundles were used per one square meter at YoungÕs Bay. Planting resulted in an initial planting abundance of 1225 shoots per site, and 1250 at Trestle Bay."" - I took the median of the range provided here (26.5 shoots). (reporting quadrat density- not site planted density)",N,Y,Y,N,Y,N,N,N,N,Water Velocity,"These were all measured before for site evaluation, not sure that they continued this monitoring during the actual year of restoration?",N,Y,Only studied ,Dungeness,"Quantitative- ""The intended experimental design compared utilization by crabs (measured by catch per unit effort, CPUE) and size of crabs at unvegetated, natural eelgrass, and transplanted eelgrass habitats. However, the eelgrass transplant treatments proved too small for adequate replication. We therefore primarily compared natural eelgrass and unvegetated treatments with traps in and surrounding one transplant site."" They could not (statistically) ""support the hypothesis of increased abundance of 0+ crab in subtidal eelgrass meadows compared to unvegetated sites"" -- no difference. ",ND,ND,ND,ND,ND
Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_2007,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_W1_2007,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_W1_2007_1 mo,Grey literature,"Pentec Environmental, Port of Everett",Puget Sound,Possession Sound,47.9,-122.5,WA,"Macroalgae, Graciliaria, Saccharina latissima",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Garden Staple, Plug",Sod and PUs,Used both Sods and PUs but did not explicitly follow progress of either method; Sod method involved removing 1 square foot of eelgrass from donor bed,Y,Declining; impacted by project but also pre-construction surveys showed decline,509,368,37.7,ND,55.2,ND,NA,NA,"Declining beginning in 2003 pre-construction, changes in beach morphology and erosion/deposition may have contributed",2007,April,Spring,2,semi-seasonally,1,1.5,ND,intertidal transplanting,ND,ND,293,13.4,ND,21.85,24.85,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio of 1.5:1,ND,Y,"The initial data about the pilot project, the 2005 transplants, etc are included in another report. Basically everything reported from 2007-2009 includes new, replanted, or supplemental plantings. Asked Todd Zackey for Year 2 report that have more details (or so I suspect since it's referenced like a lot in year 3 report)",N,N,N,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Y, sediment accretion, tidal height, changes to beach morphology",NA,Y,Y,"Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Pink salmon, Chum salmon, Forage fish, Starry flounder, Buffalo sculpin, Pile perch, Cutthroat trout, Rock sole, Shiner perch, American shad ","Salmon, Trout, Sole, Flounder, Perch","Yes, they conducted surveys that included number of eggs of forage fish along transect across 8 sampling dates. They also generated size frequency distributions of each of the salmon species they monitored and measured total crustacean and epifauna density (salmonid prey) at reference and created habitats aross two dates.",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_2007,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_W1_2007,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_W1_2007_9 mo,Grey literature,"Pentec Environmental, Port of Everett",Puget Sound,Possession Sound,47.9,-122.5,WA,"Macroalgae, Graciliaria, Saccharina latissima",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Garden Staple, Plug",Sod and PUs,Used both Sods and PUs but did not explicitly follow progress of either method; Sod method involved removing 1 square foot of eelgrass from donor bed,Y,Declining; impacted by project but also pre-construction surveys showed decline,509,368,37.7,ND,55.2,ND,NA,NA,"Declining beginning in 2003 pre-construction, changes in beach morphology and erosion/deposition may have contributed",2007,April,Spring,2,semi-seasonally,9,1.5,ND,intertidal transplanting,ND,ND,293,13.4,ND,21.85,25.4477612,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio of 1.5:1,ND,Y,"The initial data about the pilot project, the 2005 transplants, etc are included in another report. Basically everything reported from 2007-2009 includes new, replanted, or supplemental plantings. Asked Todd Zackey for Year 2 report that have more details (or so I suspect since it's referenced like a lot in year 3 report)",N,N,N,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Y, sediment accretion, tidal height, changes to beach morphology",NA,Y,Y,"Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Pink salmon, Chum salmon, Forage fish, Starry flounder, Buffalo sculpin, Pile perch, Cutthroat trout, Rock sole, Shiner perch, American shad ","Salmon, Trout, Sole, Flounder, Perch","Yes, they conducted surveys that included number of eggs of forage fish along transect across 8 sampling dates. They also generated size frequency distributions of each of the salmon species they monitored and measured total crustacean and epifauna density (salmonid prey) at reference and created habitats aross two dates.",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_2007,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_W1_2007,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_W1_2007_15 mo,Grey literature,"Pentec Environmental, Port of Everett",Puget Sound,Possession Sound,47.9,-122.5,WA,"Macroalgae, Graciliaria, Saccharina latissima",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Garden Staple, Plug",Sod and PUs,Used both Sods and PUs but did not explicitly follow progress of either method; Sod method involved removing 1 square foot of eelgrass from donor bed,Y,Declining; impacted by project but also pre-construction surveys showed decline,509,368,37.7,ND,55.2,ND,NA,NA,"Declining beginning in 2003 pre-construction, changes in beach morphology and erosion/deposition may have contributed",2007,April,Spring,2,semi-seasonally,15,1.5,ND,intertidal transplanting,ND,ND,293,13.4,ND,21.85,24.1044776,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio of 1.5:1,ND,Y,"The initial data about the pilot project, the 2005 transplants, etc are included in another report. Basically everything reported from 2007-2009 includes new, replanted, or supplemental plantings. Asked Todd Zackey for Year 2 report that have more details (or so I suspect since it's referenced like a lot in year 3 report)",N,N,N,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Y, sediment accretion, tidal height, changes to beach morphology",NA,Y,Y,"Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Pink salmon, Chum salmon, Forage fish, Starry flounder, Buffalo sculpin, Pile perch, Cutthroat trout, Rock sole, Shiner perch, American shad ","Salmon, Trout, Sole, Flounder, Perch","Yes, they conducted surveys that included number of eggs of forage fish along transect across 8 sampling dates. They also generated size frequency distributions of each of the salmon species they monitored and measured total crustacean and epifauna density (salmonid prey) at reference and created habitats aross two dates.",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_2007,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_W1_2007,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_W1_2007_23 mo,Grey literature,"Pentec Environmental, Port of Everett",Puget Sound,Possession Sound,47.9,-122.5,WA,"Macroalgae, Graciliaria, Saccharina latissima",N,Mitigation,Active,N,"Garden Staple, Plug",Sod and PUs,Used both Sods and PUs but did not explicitly follow progress of either method; Sod method involved removing 1 square foot of eelgrass from donor bed,Y,Declining; impacted by project but also pre-construction surveys showed decline,509,368,37.7,ND,55.2,ND,NA,NA,"Declining beginning in 2003 pre-construction, changes in beach morphology and erosion/deposition may have contributed",2007,April,Spring,2,semi-seasonally,23,1.5,ND,intertidal transplanting,ND,ND,293,13.4,ND,21.85,20.3731343,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio of 1.5:1,ND,Y,"The initial data about the pilot project, the 2005 transplants, etc are included in another report. Basically everything reported from 2007-2009 includes new, replanted, or supplemental plantings. Asked Todd Zackey for Year 2 report that have more details (or so I suspect since it's referenced like a lot in year 3 report)",N,N,N,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Y, sediment accretion, tidal height, changes to beach morphology",NA,Y,Y,"Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Pink salmon, Chum salmon, Forage fish, Starry flounder, Buffalo sculpin, Pile perch, Cutthroat trout, Rock sole, Shiner perch, American shad ","Salmon, Trout, Sole, Flounder, Perch","Yes, they conducted surveys that included number of eggs of forage fish along transect across 8 sampling dates. They also generated size frequency distributions of each of the salmon species they monitored and measured total crustacean and epifauna density (salmonid prey) at reference and created habitats aross two dates.",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_W2_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_W2_2005_5 mo,Grey literature,"Pentec Environmental, Port of Everett",Puget Sound,Possession Sound,47.9,-122.5,WA,"Macroalgae, Graciliaria, Saccharina latissima",N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,3 shoots per PU,"PUs are bundles of 3, 5, or 10 shoots tied with twine and secured with sod staple",Y,Declining; impacted by project but also pre-construction surveys showed decline,509,368,37.7,ND,55.2,ND,NA,NA,"Declining beginning in 2003 pre-construction, changes in beach morphology and erosion/deposition may have contributed",2005,February,Winter,5,semi-seasonally,5,1.5,ND,intertidal transplanting,ND,ND,240,7.4,ND,32.3,34.8648649,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio of 1.5:1,ND,Y,"The initial data about the pilot project, the 2005 transplants, etc are included in another report. Basically everything reported from 2007-2009 includes new, replanted, or supplemental plantings. Asked Todd Zackey for Year 2 report that have more details (or so I suspect since it's referenced like a lot in year 3 report)",N,N,N,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Y, sediment accretion, tidal height, changes to beach morphology",NA,Y,Y,"Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Pink salmon, Chum salmon, Forage fish, Starry flounder, Buffalo sculpin, Pile perch, Cutthroat trout, Rock sole, Shiner perch, American shad ","Salmon, Trout, Sole, Flounder, Perch","Yes, they conducted surveys that included number of eggs of forage fish along transect across 8 sampling dates. They also generated size frequency distributions of each of the salmon species they monitored and measured total crustacean and epifauna density (salmonid prey) at reference and created habitats aross two dates.",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_W2_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_W2_2005_10 mo,Grey literature,"Pentec Environmental, Port of Everett",Puget Sound,Possession Sound,47.9,-122.5,WA,"Macroalgae, Graciliaria, Saccharina latissima",N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,3 shoots per PU,"PUs are bundles of 3, 5, or 10 shoots tied with twine and secured with sod staple",Y,Declining; impacted by project but also pre-construction surveys showed decline,509,368,37.7,ND,55.2,ND,NA,NA,"Declining beginning in 2003 pre-construction, changes in beach morphology and erosion/deposition may have contributed",2005,February,Winter,5,semi-seasonally,10,1.5,ND,intertidal transplanting,ND,ND,240,7.4,ND,32.3,0.67567568,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio of 1.5:1,ND,Y,"The initial data about the pilot project, the 2005 transplants, etc are included in another report. Basically everything reported from 2007-2009 includes new, replanted, or supplemental plantings. Asked Todd Zackey for Year 2 report that have more details (or so I suspect since it's referenced like a lot in year 3 report)",N,N,N,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Y, sediment accretion, tidal height, changes to beach morphology",NA,Y,Y,"Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Pink salmon, Chum salmon, Forage fish, Starry flounder, Buffalo sculpin, Pile perch, Cutthroat trout, Rock sole, Shiner perch, American shad ","Salmon, Trout, Sole, Flounder, Perch","Yes, they conducted surveys that included number of eggs of forage fish along transect across 8 sampling dates. They also generated size frequency distributions of each of the salmon species they monitored and measured total crustacean and epifauna density (salmonid prey) at reference and created habitats aross two dates.",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_W2_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_W2_2005_14 mo,Grey literature,"Pentec Environmental, Port of Everett",Puget Sound,Possession Sound,47.9,-122.5,WA,"Macroalgae, Graciliaria, Saccharina latissima",N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,3 shoots per PU,"PUs are bundles of 3, 5, or 10 shoots tied with twine and secured with sod staple",Y,Declining; impacted by project but also pre-construction surveys showed decline,509,368,37.7,ND,55.2,ND,NA,NA,"Declining beginning in 2003 pre-construction, changes in beach morphology and erosion/deposition may have contributed",2005,February,Winter,5,semi-seasonally,14,1.5,ND,intertidal transplanting,ND,ND,240,7.4,ND,32.3,17.9545455,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio of 1.5:1,ND,Y,"The initial data about the pilot project, the 2005 transplants, etc are included in another report. Basically everything reported from 2007-2009 includes new, replanted, or supplemental plantings. Asked Todd Zackey for Year 2 report that have more details (or so I suspect since it's referenced like a lot in year 3 report); Changed initial shoot density to 7.4 (previously 4.4, pretty much there were supplemental plantings at a density of 4.4) to make it so initial transplant density doesn't change through time. ",N,N,N,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Y, sediment accretion, tidal height, changes to beach morphology",NA,Y,Y,"Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Pink salmon, Chum salmon, Forage fish, Starry flounder, Buffalo sculpin, Pile perch, Cutthroat trout, Rock sole, Shiner perch, American shad ","Salmon, Trout, Sole, Flounder, Perch","Yes, they conducted surveys that included number of eggs of forage fish along transect across 8 sampling dates. They also generated size frequency distributions of each of the salmon species they monitored and measured total crustacean and epifauna density (salmonid prey) at reference and created habitats aross two dates.",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_W2_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_W2_2005_15 mo,Grey literature,"Pentec Environmental, Port of Everett",Puget Sound,Possession Sound,47.9,-122.5,WA,"Macroalgae, Graciliaria, Saccharina latissima",N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,3 shoots per PU,"PUs are bundles of 3, 5, or 10 shoots tied with twine and secured with sod staple",Y,Declining; impacted by project but also pre-construction surveys showed decline,509,368,37.7,ND,55.2,ND,NA,NA,"Declining beginning in 2003 pre-construction, changes in beach morphology and erosion/deposition may have contributed",2005,February,Winter,5,semi-seasonally,15,1.5,ND,intertidal transplanting,ND,ND,240,7.4,ND,32.3,12.7272727,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio of 1.5:1,ND,Y,"The initial data about the pilot project, the 2005 transplants, etc are included in another report. Basically everything reported from 2007-2009 includes new, replanted, or supplemental plantings. Asked Todd Zackey for Year 2 report that have more details (or so I suspect since it's referenced like a lot in year 3 report); Changed initial shoot density to 7.4 (previously 4.4, pretty much there were supplemental plantings at a density of 4.4) to make it so initial transplant density doesn't change through time. ",N,N,N,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Y, sediment accretion, tidal height, changes to beach morphology",NA,Y,Y,"Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Pink salmon, Chum salmon, Forage fish, Starry flounder, Buffalo sculpin, Pile perch, Cutthroat trout, Rock sole, Shiner perch, American shad ","Salmon, Trout, Sole, Flounder, Perch","Yes, they conducted surveys that included number of eggs of forage fish along transect across 8 sampling dates. They also generated size frequency distributions of each of the salmon species they monitored and measured total crustacean and epifauna density (salmonid prey) at reference and created habitats aross two dates.",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_W2_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_W2_2005_23 mo,Grey literature,"Pentec Environmental, Port of Everett",Puget Sound,Possession Sound,47.9,-122.5,WA,"Macroalgae, Graciliaria, Saccharina latissima",N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,3 shoots per PU,"PUs are bundles of 3, 5, or 10 shoots tied with twine and secured with sod staple",Y,Declining; impacted by project but also pre-construction surveys showed decline,509,368,37.7,ND,55.2,ND,NA,NA,"Declining beginning in 2003 pre-construction, changes in beach morphology and erosion/deposition may have contributed",2005,February,Winter,5,semi-seasonally,23,1.5,ND,intertidal transplanting,ND,ND,240,7.4,ND,32.3,31.5909091,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio of 1.5:1,ND,Y,"The initial data about the pilot project, the 2005 transplants, etc are included in another report. Basically everything reported from 2007-2009 includes new, replanted, or supplemental plantings. Asked Todd Zackey for Year 2 report that have more details (or so I suspect since it's referenced like a lot in year 3 report); Changed initial shoot density to 7.4 (previously 4.4, pretty much there were supplemental plantings at a density of 4.4) to make it so initial transplant density doesn't change through time. ",N,N,N,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Y, sediment accretion, tidal height, changes to beach morphology",NA,Y,Y,"Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Pink salmon, Chum salmon, Forage fish, Starry flounder, Buffalo sculpin, Pile perch, Cutthroat trout, Rock sole, Shiner perch, American shad ","Salmon, Trout, Sole, Flounder, Perch","Yes, they conducted surveys that included number of eggs of forage fish along transect across 8 sampling dates. They also generated size frequency distributions of each of the salmon species they monitored and measured total crustacean and epifauna density (salmonid prey) at reference and created habitats aross two dates.",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_W2_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_W2_2005_28 mo,Grey literature,"Pentec Environmental, Port of Everett",Puget Sound,Possession Sound,47.9,-122.5,WA,"Macroalgae, Graciliaria, Saccharina latissima",N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,3 shoots per PU,"PUs are bundles of 3, 5, or 10 shoots tied with twine and secured with sod staple",Y,Declining; impacted by project but also pre-construction surveys showed decline,509,368,37.7,ND,55.2,ND,NA,NA,"Declining beginning in 2003 pre-construction, changes in beach morphology and erosion/deposition may have contributed",2005,February,Winter,5,semi-seasonally,28,1.5,ND,intertidal transplanting,ND,ND,240,7.4,ND,32.3,30.9090909,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio of 1.5:1,ND,Y,"The initial data about the pilot project, the 2005 transplants, etc are included in another report. Basically everything reported from 2007-2009 includes new, replanted, or supplemental plantings. Asked Todd Zackey for Year 2 report that have more details (or so I suspect since it's referenced like a lot in year 3 report); Changed initial shoot density to 7.4 (previously 4.4, pretty much there were supplemental plantings at a density of 4.4) to make it so initial transplant density doesn't change through time. ",N,N,N,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Y, sediment accretion, tidal height, changes to beach morphology",NA,Y,Y,"Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Pink salmon, Chum salmon, Forage fish, Starry flounder, Buffalo sculpin, Pile perch, Cutthroat trout, Rock sole, Shiner perch, American shad ","Salmon, Trout, Sole, Flounder, Perch","Yes, they conducted surveys that included number of eggs of forage fish along transect across 8 sampling dates. They also generated size frequency distributions of each of the salmon species they monitored and measured total crustacean and epifauna density (salmonid prey) at reference and created habitats aross two dates.",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_W2_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_W2_2005_36 mo,Grey literature,"Pentec Environmental, Port of Everett",Puget Sound,Possession Sound,47.9,-122.5,WA,"Macroalgae, Graciliaria, Saccharina latissima",N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,3 shoots per PU,"PUs are bundles of 3, 5, or 10 shoots tied with twine and secured with sod staple",Y,Declining; impacted by project but also pre-construction surveys showed decline,509,368,37.7,ND,55.2,ND,NA,NA,"Declining beginning in 2003 pre-construction, changes in beach morphology and erosion/deposition may have contributed",2005,February,Winter,5,semi-seasonally,36,1.5,ND,intertidal transplanting,ND,ND,240,7.4,ND,32.3,17.5,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio of 1.5:1,ND,N,"The initial data about the pilot project, the 2005 transplants, etc are included in another report. Basically everything reported from 2007-2009 includes new, replanted, or supplemental plantings. Asked Todd Zackey for Year 2 report that have more details (or so I suspect since it's referenced like a lot in year 3 report); Changed initial shoot density to 7.4 (previously 4.4, pretty much there were supplemental plantings at a density of 4.4) to make it so initial transplant density doesn't change through time. ",N,N,N,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Y, sediment accretion, tidal height, changes to beach morphology",NA,Y,Y,"Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Pink salmon, Chum salmon, Forage fish, Starry flounder, Buffalo sculpin, Pile perch, Cutthroat trout, Rock sole, Shiner perch, American shad ","Salmon, Trout, Sole, Flounder, Perch","Yes, they conducted surveys that included number of eggs of forage fish along transect across 8 sampling dates. They also generated size frequency distributions of each of the salmon species they monitored and measured total crustacean and epifauna density (salmonid prey) at reference and created habitats aross two dates.",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_W3_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_W3_2005_5 mo,Grey literature,"Pentec Environmental, Port of Everett",Puget Sound,Possession Sound,47.9,-122.5,WA,"Macroalgae, Graciliaria, Saccharina latissima",N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,3 shoots per PU,"PUs are bundles of 3, 5, or 10 shoots tied with twine and secured with sod staple",Y,Declining; impacted by project but also pre-construction surveys showed decline,509,368,37.7,ND,55.2,ND,NA,NA,"Declining beginning in 2003 pre-construction, changes in beach morphology and erosion/deposition may have contributed",2005,February,Winter,5,semi-seasonally,5,1.5,ND,intertidal transplanting,ND,ND,300,9.3,ND,32.3,25.6989247,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio of 1.5:1,ND,N,"The initial data about the pilot project, the 2005 transplants, etc are included in another report. Basically everything reported from 2007-2009 includes new, replanted, or supplemental plantings. Asked Todd Zackey for Year 2 report that have more details (or so I suspect since it's referenced like a lot in year 3 report)",N,N,N,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Y, sediment accretion, tidal height, changes to beach morphology",NA,Y,Y,"Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Pink salmon, Chum salmon, Forage fish, Starry flounder, Buffalo sculpin, Pile perch, Cutthroat trout, Rock sole, Shiner perch, American shad ","Salmon, Trout, Sole, Flounder, Perch","Yes, they conducted surveys that included number of eggs of forage fish along transect across 8 sampling dates. They also generated size frequency distributions of each of the salmon species they monitored and measured total crustacean and epifauna density (salmonid prey) at reference and created habitats aross two dates.",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_W3_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_W3_2005_10 mo,Grey literature,"Pentec Environmental, Port of Everett",Puget Sound,Possession Sound,47.9,-122.5,WA,"Macroalgae, Graciliaria, Saccharina latissima",N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,3 shoots per PU,"PUs are bundles of 3, 5, or 10 shoots tied with twine and secured with sod staple",Y,Declining; impacted by project but also pre-construction surveys showed decline,509,368,37.7,ND,55.2,ND,NA,NA,"Declining beginning in 2003 pre-construction, changes in beach morphology and erosion/deposition may have contributed",2005,February,Winter,5,semi-seasonally,10,1.5,ND,intertidal transplanting,ND,ND,300,9.3,ND,32.3,3.11827957,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio of 1.5:1,ND,N,"The initial data about the pilot project, the 2005 transplants, etc are included in another report. Basically everything reported from 2007-2009 includes new, replanted, or supplemental plantings. Asked Todd Zackey for Year 2 report that have more details (or so I suspect since it's referenced like a lot in year 3 report)",N,N,N,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Y, sediment accretion, tidal height, changes to beach morphology",NA,Y,Y,"Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Pink salmon, Chum salmon, Forage fish, Starry flounder, Buffalo sculpin, Pile perch, Cutthroat trout, Rock sole, Shiner perch, American shad ","Salmon, Trout, Sole, Flounder, Perch","Yes, they conducted surveys that included number of eggs of forage fish along transect across 8 sampling dates. They also generated size frequency distributions of each of the salmon species they monitored and measured total crustacean and epifauna density (salmonid prey) at reference and created habitats aross two dates.",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_W3_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_W3_2005_14 mo,Grey literature,"Pentec Environmental, Port of Everett",Puget Sound,Possession Sound,47.9,-122.5,WA,"Macroalgae, Graciliaria, Saccharina latissima",N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,3 shoots per PU,"PUs are bundles of 3, 5, or 10 shoots tied with twine and secured with sod staple",Y,Declining; impacted by project but also pre-construction surveys showed decline,509,368,37.7,ND,55.2,ND,NA,NA,"Declining beginning in 2003 pre-construction, changes in beach morphology and erosion/deposition may have contributed",2005,February,Winter,5,semi-seasonally,14,1.5,ND,intertidal transplanting,ND,ND,300,9.3,0,32.3,0,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio of 1.5:1,N,N,"The initial data about the pilot project, the 2005 transplants, etc are included in another report. Basically everything reported from 2007-2009 includes new, replanted, or supplemental plantings. Asked Todd Zackey for Year 2 report that have more details (or so I suspect since it's referenced like a lot in year 3 report)",N,N,N,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Y, sediment accretion, tidal height, changes to beach morphology",NA,Y,Y,"Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Pink salmon, Chum salmon, Forage fish, Starry flounder, Buffalo sculpin, Pile perch, Cutthroat trout, Rock sole, Shiner perch, American shad ","Salmon, Trout, Sole, Flounder, Perch","Yes, they conducted surveys that included number of eggs of forage fish along transect across 8 sampling dates. They also generated size frequency distributions of each of the salmon species they monitored and measured total crustacean and epifauna density (salmonid prey) at reference and created habitats aross two dates.",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_W3_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_W3_2005_15 mo,Grey literature,"Pentec Environmental, Port of Everett",Puget Sound,Possession Sound,47.9,-122.5,WA,"Macroalgae, Graciliaria, Saccharina latissima",N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,3 shoots per PU,"PUs are bundles of 3, 5, or 10 shoots tied with twine and secured with sod staple",Y,Declining; impacted by project but also pre-construction surveys showed decline,509,368,37.7,ND,55.2,ND,NA,NA,"Declining beginning in 2003 pre-construction, changes in beach morphology and erosion/deposition may have contributed",2005,February,Winter,5,semi-seasonally,15,1.5,ND,intertidal transplanting,ND,ND,300,9.3,0,32.3,0,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio of 1.5:1,N,N,"The initial data about the pilot project, the 2005 transplants, etc are included in another report. Basically everything reported from 2007-2009 includes new, replanted, or supplemental plantings. Asked Todd Zackey for Year 2 report that have more details (or so I suspect since it's referenced like a lot in year 3 report)",N,N,N,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Y, sediment accretion, tidal height, changes to beach morphology",NA,Y,Y,"Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Pink salmon, Chum salmon, Forage fish, Starry flounder, Buffalo sculpin, Pile perch, Cutthroat trout, Rock sole, Shiner perch, American shad ","Salmon, Trout, Sole, Flounder, Perch","Yes, they conducted surveys that included number of eggs of forage fish along transect across 8 sampling dates. They also generated size frequency distributions of each of the salmon species they monitored and measured total crustacean and epifauna density (salmonid prey) at reference and created habitats aross two dates.",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_W3_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_W3_2005_23 mo,Grey literature,"Pentec Environmental, Port of Everett",Puget Sound,Possession Sound,47.9,-122.5,WA,"Macroalgae, Graciliaria, Saccharina latissima",N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,3 shoots per PU,"PUs are bundles of 3, 5, or 10 shoots tied with twine and secured with sod staple",Y,Declining; impacted by project but also pre-construction surveys showed decline,509,368,37.7,ND,55.2,ND,NA,NA,"Declining beginning in 2003 pre-construction, changes in beach morphology and erosion/deposition may have contributed",2005,February,Winter,5,semi-seasonally,23,1.5,ND,intertidal transplanting,ND,ND,300,9.3,0,32.3,0,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio of 1.5:1,N,Y,"The initial data about the pilot project, the 2005 transplants, etc are included in another report. Basically everything reported from 2007-2009 includes new, replanted, or supplemental plantings. Asked Todd Zackey for Year 2 report that have more details (or so I suspect since it's referenced like a lot in year 3 report)",N,N,N,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Y, sediment accretion, tidal height, changes to beach morphology",NA,Y,Y,"Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Pink salmon, Chum salmon, Forage fish, Starry flounder, Buffalo sculpin, Pile perch, Cutthroat trout, Rock sole, Shiner perch, American shad ","Salmon, Trout, Sole, Flounder, Perch","Yes, they conducted surveys that included number of eggs of forage fish along transect across 8 sampling dates. They also generated size frequency distributions of each of the salmon species they monitored and measured total crustacean and epifauna density (salmonid prey) at reference and created habitats aross two dates.",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_W3_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_W3_2005_28 mo,Grey literature,"Pentec Environmental, Port of Everett",Puget Sound,Possession Sound,47.9,-122.5,WA,"Macroalgae, Graciliaria, Saccharina latissima",N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,3 shoots per PU,"PUs are bundles of 3, 5, or 10 shoots tied with twine and secured with sod staple",Y,Declining; impacted by project but also pre-construction surveys showed decline,509,368,37.7,ND,55.2,ND,NA,NA,"Declining beginning in 2003 pre-construction, changes in beach morphology and erosion/deposition may have contributed",2005,February,Winter,5,semi-seasonally,28,1.5,ND,intertidal transplanting,ND,ND,300,9.3,0,32.3,0,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio of 1.5:1,N,Y,"The initial data about the pilot project, the 2005 transplants, etc are included in another report. Basically everything reported from 2007-2009 includes new, replanted, or supplemental plantings. Asked Todd Zackey for Year 2 report that have more details (or so I suspect since it's referenced like a lot in year 3 report)",N,N,N,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Y, sediment accretion, tidal height, changes to beach morphology",NA,Y,Y,"Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Pink salmon, Chum salmon, Forage fish, Starry flounder, Buffalo sculpin, Pile perch, Cutthroat trout, Rock sole, Shiner perch, American shad ","Salmon, Trout, Sole, Flounder, Perch","Yes, they conducted surveys that included number of eggs of forage fish along transect across 8 sampling dates. They also generated size frequency distributions of each of the salmon species they monitored and measured total crustacean and epifauna density (salmonid prey) at reference and created habitats aross two dates.",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_W3_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_W3_2005_36 mo,Grey literature,"Pentec Environmental, Port of Everett",Puget Sound,Possession Sound,47.9,-122.5,WA,"Macroalgae, Graciliaria, Saccharina latissima",N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,3 shoots per PU,"PUs are bundles of 3, 5, or 10 shoots tied with twine and secured with sod staple",Y,Declining; impacted by project but also pre-construction surveys showed decline,509,368,37.7,ND,55.2,ND,NA,NA,"Declining beginning in 2003 pre-construction, changes in beach morphology and erosion/deposition may have contributed",2005,February,Winter,5,semi-seasonally,36,1.5,ND,intertidal transplanting,ND,ND,300,9.3,0,32.3,0,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio of 1.5:1,N,Y,"The initial data about the pilot project, the 2005 transplants, etc are included in another report. Basically everything reported from 2007-2009 includes new, replanted, or supplemental plantings. Asked Todd Zackey for Year 2 report that have more details (or so I suspect since it's referenced like a lot in year 3 report)",N,N,N,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Y, sediment accretion, tidal height, changes to beach morphology",NA,Y,Y,"Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Pink salmon, Chum salmon, Forage fish, Starry flounder, Buffalo sculpin, Pile perch, Cutthroat trout, Rock sole, Shiner perch, American shad ","Salmon, Trout, Sole, Flounder, Perch","Yes, they conducted surveys that included number of eggs of forage fish along transect across 8 sampling dates. They also generated size frequency distributions of each of the salmon species they monitored and measured total crustacean and epifauna density (salmonid prey) at reference and created habitats aross two dates.",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_2007,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_E1_2007,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_E1_2007_1 mo,Grey literature,"Pentec Environmental, Port of Everett",Puget Sound,Possession Sound,47.9,-122.5,WA,"Macroalgae, Graciliaria, Saccharina latissima",N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,5 shoots per PU,"PUs are bundles of 3, 5, or 10 shoots tied with twine and secured with sod staple",Y,Declining; impacted by project but also pre-construction surveys showed decline,437,15.1,21.8,ND,42,ND,NA,NA,"Declining beginning in 2003 pre-construction, changes in beach morphology and erosion/deposition may have contributed",2007,April,Spring,2,semi-seasonally,1,1.5,ND,intertidal transplanting,ND,ND,260,19.3,ND,13.45,9.94818653,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio of 1.5:1,ND,Y,"The initial data about the pilot project, the 2005 transplants, etc are included in another report. Basically everything reported from 2007-2009 includes new, replanted, or supplemental plantings. Asked Todd Zackey for Year 2 report that have more details (or so I suspect since it's referenced like a lot in year 3 report)",N,N,N,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Y, sediment accretion, tidal height, changes to beach morphology",NA,Y,Y,"Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Pink salmon, Chum salmon, Forage fish, Starry flounder, Buffalo sculpin, Pile perch, Cutthroat trout, Rock sole, Shiner perch, American shad ","Salmon, Trout, Sole, Flounder, Perch","Yes, they conducted surveys that included number of eggs of forage fish along transect across 8 sampling dates. They also generated size frequency distributions of each of the salmon species they monitored and measured total crustacean and epifauna density (salmonid prey) at reference and created habitats aross two dates.",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_2007,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_E1_2007,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_E1_2007_9 mo,Grey literature,"Pentec Environmental, Port of Everett",Puget Sound,Possession Sound,47.9,-122.5,WA,"Macroalgae, Graciliaria, Saccharina latissima",N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,5 shoots per PU,"PUs are bundles of 3, 5, or 10 shoots tied with twine and secured with sod staple",Y,Declining; impacted by project but also pre-construction surveys showed decline,437,15.1,21.8,ND,42,ND,NA,NA,"Declining beginning in 2003 pre-construction, changes in beach morphology and erosion/deposition may have contributed",2007,April,Spring,2,semi-seasonally,9,1.5,ND,intertidal transplanting,ND,ND,260,19.3,ND,13.45,11.2435233,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio of 1.5:1,ND,Y,"The initial data about the pilot project, the 2005 transplants, etc are included in another report. Basically everything reported from 2007-2009 includes new, replanted, or supplemental plantings. Asked Todd Zackey for Year 2 report that have more details (or so I suspect since it's referenced like a lot in year 3 report)",N,N,N,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Y, sediment accretion, tidal height, changes to beach morphology",NA,Y,Y,"Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Pink salmon, Chum salmon, Forage fish, Starry flounder, Buffalo sculpin, Pile perch, Cutthroat trout, Rock sole, Shiner perch, American shad ","Salmon, Trout, Sole, Flounder, Perch","Yes, they conducted surveys that included number of eggs of forage fish along transect across 8 sampling dates. They also generated size frequency distributions of each of the salmon species they monitored and measured total crustacean and epifauna density (salmonid prey) at reference and created habitats aross two dates.",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_2007,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_E1_2007,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_E1_2007_15 mo,Grey literature,"Pentec Environmental, Port of Everett",Puget Sound,Possession Sound,47.9,-122.5,WA,"Macroalgae, Graciliaria, Saccharina latissima",N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,5 shoots per PU,"PUs are bundles of 3, 5, or 10 shoots tied with twine and secured with sod staple",Y,Declining; impacted by project but also pre-construction surveys showed decline,437,15.1,21.8,ND,42,ND,NA,NA,"Declining beginning in 2003 pre-construction, changes in beach morphology and erosion/deposition may have contributed",2007,April,Spring,2,semi-seasonally,15,1.5,ND,intertidal transplanting,ND,ND,260,19.3,ND,13.45,5.80310881,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio of 1.5:1,ND,Y,"The initial data about the pilot project, the 2005 transplants, etc are included in another report. Basically everything reported from 2007-2009 includes new, replanted, or supplemental plantings. Asked Todd Zackey for Year 2 report that have more details (or so I suspect since it's referenced like a lot in year 3 report)",N,N,N,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Y, sediment accretion, tidal height, changes to beach morphology",NA,Y,Y,"Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Pink salmon, Chum salmon, Forage fish, Starry flounder, Buffalo sculpin, Pile perch, Cutthroat trout, Rock sole, Shiner perch, American shad ","Salmon, Trout, Sole, Flounder, Perch","Yes, they conducted surveys that included number of eggs of forage fish along transect across 8 sampling dates. They also generated size frequency distributions of each of the salmon species they monitored and measured total crustacean and epifauna density (salmonid prey) at reference and created habitats aross two dates.",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_2007,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_E1_2007,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_E1_2007_23 mo,Grey literature,"Pentec Environmental, Port of Everett",Puget Sound,Possession Sound,47.9,-122.5,WA,"Macroalgae, Graciliaria, Saccharina latissima",N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,5 shoots per PU,"PUs are bundles of 3, 5, or 10 shoots tied with twine and secured with sod staple",Y,Declining; impacted by project but also pre-construction surveys showed decline,437,15.1,21.8,ND,42,ND,NA,NA,"Declining beginning in 2003 pre-construction, changes in beach morphology and erosion/deposition may have contributed",2007,April,Spring,2,semi-seasonally,23,1.5,ND,intertidal transplanting,ND,ND,260,19.3,ND,13.45,20.3626943,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio of 1.5:1,ND,Y,"The initial data about the pilot project, the 2005 transplants, etc are included in another report. Basically everything reported from 2007-2009 includes new, replanted, or supplemental plantings. Asked Todd Zackey for Year 2 report that have more details (or so I suspect since it's referenced like a lot in year 3 report)",N,N,N,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Y, sediment accretion, tidal height, changes to beach morphology",NA,Y,Y,"Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Pink salmon, Chum salmon, Forage fish, Starry flounder, Buffalo sculpin, Pile perch, Cutthroat trout, Rock sole, Shiner perch, American shad ","Salmon, Trout, Sole, Flounder, Perch","Yes, they conducted surveys that included number of eggs of forage fish along transect across 8 sampling dates. They also generated size frequency distributions of each of the salmon species they monitored and measured total crustacean and epifauna density (salmonid prey) at reference and created habitats aross two dates.",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_E2_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_E2_2005_5 mo,Grey literature,"Pentec Environmental, Port of Everett",Puget Sound,Possession Sound,47.9,-122.5,WA,"Macroalgae, Graciliaria, Saccharina latissima",N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,3 shoots per PU,"PUs are bundles of 3, 5, or 10 shoots tied with twine and secured with sod staple",Y,Declining; impacted by project but also pre-construction surveys showed decline,437,15.1,21.8,ND,42,ND,NA,NA,"Declining beginning in 2003 pre-construction, changes in beach morphology and erosion/deposition may have contributed",2005,February,Winter,5,semi-seasonally,5,1.5,ND,intertidal transplanting,ND,ND,300,9.3,ND,32.3,71.1827957,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio of 1.5:1,ND,Y,"The initial data about the pilot project, the 2005 transplants, etc are included in another report. Basically everything reported from 2007-2009 includes new, replanted, or supplemental plantings. Asked Todd Zackey for Year 2 report that have more details (or so I suspect since it's referenced like a lot in year 3 report)",N,N,N,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Y, sediment accretion, tidal height, changes to beach morphology",NA,Y,Y,"Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Pink salmon, Chum salmon, Forage fish, Starry flounder, Buffalo sculpin, Pile perch, Cutthroat trout, Rock sole, Shiner perch, American shad ","Salmon, Trout, Sole, Flounder, Perch","Yes, they conducted surveys that included number of eggs of forage fish along transect across 8 sampling dates. They also generated size frequency distributions of each of the salmon species they monitored and measured total crustacean and epifauna density (salmonid prey) at reference and created habitats aross two dates.",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_E2_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_E2_2005_10 mo,Grey literature,"Pentec Environmental, Port of Everett",Puget Sound,Possession Sound,47.9,-122.5,WA,"Macroalgae, Graciliaria, Saccharina latissima",N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,3 shoots per PU,"PUs are bundles of 3, 5, or 10 shoots tied with twine and secured with sod staple",Y,Declining; impacted by project but also pre-construction surveys showed decline,437,15.1,21.8,ND,42,ND,NA,NA,"Declining beginning in 2003 pre-construction, changes in beach morphology and erosion/deposition may have contributed",2005,February,Winter,5,semi-seasonally,10,1.5,ND,intertidal transplanting,ND,ND,300,9.3,ND,32.3,9.78494624,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio of 1.5:1,ND,Y,"The initial data about the pilot project, the 2005 transplants, etc are included in another report. Basically everything reported from 2007-2009 includes new, replanted, or supplemental plantings. Asked Todd Zackey for Year 2 report that have more details (or so I suspect since it's referenced like a lot in year 3 report)",N,N,N,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Y, sediment accretion, tidal height, changes to beach morphology",NA,Y,Y,"Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Pink salmon, Chum salmon, Forage fish, Starry flounder, Buffalo sculpin, Pile perch, Cutthroat trout, Rock sole, Shiner perch, American shad ","Salmon, Trout, Sole, Flounder, Perch","Yes, they conducted surveys that included number of eggs of forage fish along transect across 8 sampling dates. They also generated size frequency distributions of each of the salmon species they monitored and measured total crustacean and epifauna density (salmonid prey) at reference and created habitats aross two dates.",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_E2_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_E2_2005_14 mo,Grey literature,"Pentec Environmental, Port of Everett",Puget Sound,Possession Sound,47.9,-122.5,WA,"Macroalgae, Graciliaria, Saccharina latissima",N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,3 shoots per PU,"PUs are bundles of 3, 5, or 10 shoots tied with twine and secured with sod staple",Y,Declining; impacted by project but also pre-construction surveys showed decline,437,15.1,21.8,ND,42,ND,NA,NA,"Declining beginning in 2003 pre-construction, changes in beach morphology and erosion/deposition may have contributed",2005,February,Winter,5,semi-seasonally,14,1.5,ND,intertidal transplanting,ND,ND,300,9.3,11.15,32.3,17.3,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio of 1.5:1,Y,Y,"The initial data about the pilot project, the 2005 transplants, etc are included in another report. Basically everything reported from 2007-2009 includes new, replanted, or supplemental plantings. Asked Todd Zackey for Year 2 report that have more details (or so I suspect since it's referenced like a lot in year 3 report)",N,N,N,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Y, sediment accretion, tidal height, changes to beach morphology",NA,Y,Y,"Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Pink salmon, Chum salmon, Forage fish, Starry flounder, Buffalo sculpin, Pile perch, Cutthroat trout, Rock sole, Shiner perch, American shad ","Salmon, Trout, Sole, Flounder, Perch","Yes, they conducted surveys that included number of eggs of forage fish along transect across 8 sampling dates. They also generated size frequency distributions of each of the salmon species they monitored and measured total crustacean and epifauna density (salmonid prey) at reference and created habitats aross two dates.",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_E2_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_E2_2005_15 mo,Grey literature,"Pentec Environmental, Port of Everett",Puget Sound,Possession Sound,47.9,-122.5,WA,"Macroalgae, Graciliaria, Saccharina latissima",N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,3 shoots per PU,"PUs are bundles of 3, 5, or 10 shoots tied with twine and secured with sod staple",Y,Declining; impacted by project but also pre-construction surveys showed decline,437,15.1,21.8,ND,42,ND,NA,NA,"Declining beginning in 2003 pre-construction, changes in beach morphology and erosion/deposition may have contributed",2005,February,Winter,5,semi-seasonally,15,1.5,ND,intertidal transplanting,ND,ND,300,9.3,ND,32.3,13.8709677,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio of 1.5:1,ND,N,"The initial data about the pilot project, the 2005 transplants, etc are included in another report. Basically everything reported from 2007-2009 includes new, replanted, or supplemental plantings. Asked Todd Zackey for Year 2 report that have more details (or so I suspect since it's referenced like a lot in year 3 report)",N,N,N,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Y, sediment accretion, tidal height, changes to beach morphology",NA,Y,Y,"Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Pink salmon, Chum salmon, Forage fish, Starry flounder, Buffalo sculpin, Pile perch, Cutthroat trout, Rock sole, Shiner perch, American shad ","Salmon, Trout, Sole, Flounder, Perch","Yes, they conducted surveys that included number of eggs of forage fish along transect across 8 sampling dates. They also generated size frequency distributions of each of the salmon species they monitored and measured total crustacean and epifauna density (salmonid prey) at reference and created habitats aross two dates.",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_E2_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_E2_2005_23 mo,Grey literature,"Pentec Environmental, Port of Everett",Puget Sound,Possession Sound,47.9,-122.5,WA,"Macroalgae, Graciliaria, Saccharina latissima",N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,3 shoots per PU,"PUs are bundles of 3, 5, or 10 shoots tied with twine and secured with sod staple",Y,Declining; impacted by project but also pre-construction surveys showed decline,437,15.1,21.8,ND,42,ND,NA,NA,"Declining beginning in 2003 pre-construction, changes in beach morphology and erosion/deposition may have contributed",2005,February,Winter,5,semi-seasonally,23,1.5,ND,intertidal transplanting,ND,ND,300,9.3,ND,32.3,5.37634409,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio of 1.5:1,ND,N,"The initial data about the pilot project, the 2005 transplants, etc are included in another report. Basically everything reported from 2007-2009 includes new, replanted, or supplemental plantings. Asked Todd Zackey for Year 2 report that have more details (or so I suspect since it's referenced like a lot in year 3 report)",N,N,N,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Y, sediment accretion, tidal height, changes to beach morphology",NA,Y,Y,"Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Pink salmon, Chum salmon, Forage fish, Starry flounder, Buffalo sculpin, Pile perch, Cutthroat trout, Rock sole, Shiner perch, American shad ","Salmon, Trout, Sole, Flounder, Perch","Yes, they conducted surveys that included number of eggs of forage fish along transect across 8 sampling dates. They also generated size frequency distributions of each of the salmon species they monitored and measured total crustacean and epifauna density (salmonid prey) at reference and created habitats aross two dates.",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_E2_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_E2_2005_28 mo,Grey literature,"Pentec Environmental, Port of Everett",Puget Sound,Possession Sound,47.9,-122.5,WA,"Macroalgae, Graciliaria, Saccharina latissima",N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,3 shoots per PU,"PUs are bundles of 3, 5, or 10 shoots tied with twine and secured with sod staple",Y,Declining; impacted by project but also pre-construction surveys showed decline,437,15.1,21.8,ND,42,ND,NA,NA,"Declining beginning in 2003 pre-construction, changes in beach morphology and erosion/deposition may have contributed",2005,February,Winter,5,semi-seasonally,28,1.5,ND,intertidal transplanting,ND,ND,300,9.3,ND,32.3,2.15053763,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio of 1.5:1,ND,N,"The initial data about the pilot project, the 2005 transplants, etc are included in another report. Basically everything reported from 2007-2009 includes new, replanted, or supplemental plantings. Asked Todd Zackey for Year 2 report that have more details (or so I suspect since it's referenced like a lot in year 3 report)",N,N,N,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Y, sediment accretion, tidal height, changes to beach morphology",NA,Y,Y,"Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Pink salmon, Chum salmon, Forage fish, Starry flounder, Buffalo sculpin, Pile perch, Cutthroat trout, Rock sole, Shiner perch, American shad ","Salmon, Trout, Sole, Flounder, Perch","Yes, they conducted surveys that included number of eggs of forage fish along transect across 8 sampling dates. They also generated size frequency distributions of each of the salmon species they monitored and measured total crustacean and epifauna density (salmonid prey) at reference and created habitats aross two dates.",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_E2_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_E2_2005_36 mo,Grey literature,"Pentec Environmental, Port of Everett",Puget Sound,Possession Sound,47.9,-122.5,WA,"Macroalgae, Graciliaria, Saccharina latissima",N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,3 shoots per PU,"PUs are bundles of 3, 5, or 10 shoots tied with twine and secured with sod staple",Y,Declining; impacted by project but also pre-construction surveys showed decline,437,15.1,21.8,ND,42,ND,NA,NA,"Declining beginning in 2003 pre-construction, changes in beach morphology and erosion/deposition may have contributed",2005,February,Winter,5,semi-seasonally,36,1.5,ND,intertidal transplanting,ND,ND,300,9.3,ND,32.3,10.5376344,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio of 1.5:1,ND,N,"The initial data about the pilot project, the 2005 transplants, etc are included in another report. Basically everything reported from 2007-2009 includes new, replanted, or supplemental plantings. Asked Todd Zackey for Year 2 report that have more details (or so I suspect since it's referenced like a lot in year 3 report)",N,N,N,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Y, sediment accretion, tidal height, changes to beach morphology",NA,Y,Y,"Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Pink salmon, Chum salmon, Forage fish, Starry flounder, Buffalo sculpin, Pile perch, Cutthroat trout, Rock sole, Shiner perch, American shad ","Salmon, Trout, Sole, Flounder, Perch","Yes, they conducted surveys that included number of eggs of forage fish along transect across 8 sampling dates. They also generated size frequency distributions of each of the salmon species they monitored and measured total crustacean and epifauna density (salmonid prey) at reference and created habitats aross two dates.",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_E3_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_E3_2005_5 mo,Grey literature,"Pentec Environmental, Port of Everett",Puget Sound,Possession Sound,47.9,-122.5,WA,"Macroalgae, Graciliaria, Saccharina latissima",N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,3 shoots per PU,"PUs are bundles of 3, 5, or 10 shoots tied with twine and secured with sod staple",Y,Declining; impacted by project but also pre-construction surveys showed decline,437,15.1,21.8,ND,42,ND,NA,NA,"Declining beginning in 2003 pre-construction, changes in beach morphology and erosion/deposition may have contributed",2005,February,Winter,5,semi-seasonally,5,1.5,ND,intertidal transplanting,ND,ND,71,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio of 1.5:1,ND,N,"The initial data about the pilot project, the 2005 transplants, etc are included in another report. Basically everything reported from 2007-2009 includes new, replanted, or supplemental plantings. Asked Todd Zackey for Year 2 report that have more details (or so I suspect since it's referenced like a lot in year 3 report)",N,N,N,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Y, sediment accretion, tidal height, changes to beach morphology",NA,Y,Y,"Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Pink salmon, Chum salmon, Forage fish, Starry flounder, Buffalo sculpin, Pile perch, Cutthroat trout, Rock sole, Shiner perch, American shad ","Salmon, Trout, Sole, Flounder, Perch","Yes, they conducted surveys that included number of eggs of forage fish along transect across 8 sampling dates. They also generated size frequency distributions of each of the salmon species they monitored and measured total crustacean and epifauna density (salmonid prey) at reference and created habitats aross two dates.",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_E3_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_E3_2005_10 mo,Grey literature,"Pentec Environmental, Port of Everett",Puget Sound,Possession Sound,47.9,-122.5,WA,"Macroalgae, Graciliaria, Saccharina latissima",N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,3 shoots per PU,"PUs are bundles of 3, 5, or 10 shoots tied with twine and secured with sod staple",Y,Declining; impacted by project but also pre-construction surveys showed decline,437,15.1,21.8,ND,42,ND,NA,NA,"Declining beginning in 2003 pre-construction, changes in beach morphology and erosion/deposition may have contributed",2005,February,Winter,5,semi-seasonally,10,1.5,ND,intertidal transplanting,ND,ND,71,ND,ND,ND,0,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio of 1.5:1,ND,N,"The initial data about the pilot project, the 2005 transplants, etc are included in another report. Basically everything reported from 2007-2009 includes new, replanted, or supplemental plantings. Asked Todd Zackey for Year 2 report that have more details (or so I suspect since it's referenced like a lot in year 3 report)",N,N,N,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Y, sediment accretion, tidal height, changes to beach morphology",NA,Y,Y,"Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Pink salmon, Chum salmon, Forage fish, Starry flounder, Buffalo sculpin, Pile perch, Cutthroat trout, Rock sole, Shiner perch, American shad ","Salmon, Trout, Sole, Flounder, Perch","Yes, they conducted surveys that included number of eggs of forage fish along transect across 8 sampling dates. They also generated size frequency distributions of each of the salmon species they monitored and measured total crustacean and epifauna density (salmonid prey) at reference and created habitats aross two dates.",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_E3_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_E3_2005_14 mo,Grey literature,"Pentec Environmental, Port of Everett",Puget Sound,Possession Sound,47.9,-122.5,WA,"Macroalgae, Graciliaria, Saccharina latissima",N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,3 shoots per PU,"PUs are bundles of 3, 5, or 10 shoots tied with twine and secured with sod staple",Y,Declining; impacted by project but also pre-construction surveys showed decline,437,15.1,21.8,ND,42,ND,NA,NA,"Declining beginning in 2003 pre-construction, changes in beach morphology and erosion/deposition may have contributed",2005,February,Winter,5,semi-seasonally,14,1.5,ND,intertidal transplanting,ND,ND,71,ND,ND,ND,0,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio of 1.5:1,ND,N,"The initial data about the pilot project, the 2005 transplants, etc are included in another report. Basically everything reported from 2007-2009 includes new, replanted, or supplemental plantings. Asked Todd Zackey for Year 2 report that have more details (or so I suspect since it's referenced like a lot in year 3 report)",N,N,N,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Y, sediment accretion, tidal height, changes to beach morphology",NA,Y,Y,"Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Pink salmon, Chum salmon, Forage fish, Starry flounder, Buffalo sculpin, Pile perch, Cutthroat trout, Rock sole, Shiner perch, American shad ","Salmon, Trout, Sole, Flounder, Perch","Yes, they conducted surveys that included number of eggs of forage fish along transect across 8 sampling dates. They also generated size frequency distributions of each of the salmon species they monitored and measured total crustacean and epifauna density (salmonid prey) at reference and created habitats aross two dates.",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_E3_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_E3_2005_15 mo,Grey literature,"Pentec Environmental, Port of Everett",Puget Sound,Possession Sound,47.9,-122.5,WA,"Macroalgae, Graciliaria, Saccharina latissima",N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,3 shoots per PU,"PUs are bundles of 3, 5, or 10 shoots tied with twine and secured with sod staple",Y,Declining; impacted by project but also pre-construction surveys showed decline,437,15.1,21.8,ND,42,ND,NA,NA,"Declining beginning in 2003 pre-construction, changes in beach morphology and erosion/deposition may have contributed",2005,February,Winter,5,semi-seasonally,15,1.5,ND,intertidal transplanting,ND,ND,71,ND,ND,ND,0,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio of 1.5:1,ND,N,"The initial data about the pilot project, the 2005 transplants, etc are included in another report. Basically everything reported from 2007-2009 includes new, replanted, or supplemental plantings. Asked Todd Zackey for Year 2 report that have more details (or so I suspect since it's referenced like a lot in year 3 report)",N,N,N,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Y, sediment accretion, tidal height, changes to beach morphology",NA,Y,Y,"Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Pink salmon, Chum salmon, Forage fish, Starry flounder, Buffalo sculpin, Pile perch, Cutthroat trout, Rock sole, Shiner perch, American shad ","Salmon, Trout, Sole, Flounder, Perch","Yes, they conducted surveys that included number of eggs of forage fish along transect across 8 sampling dates. They also generated size frequency distributions of each of the salmon species they monitored and measured total crustacean and epifauna density (salmonid prey) at reference and created habitats aross two dates.",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_E3_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_E3_2005_23 mo,Grey literature,"Pentec Environmental, Port of Everett",Puget Sound,Possession Sound,47.9,-122.5,WA,"Macroalgae, Graciliaria, Saccharina latissima",N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,3 shoots per PU,"PUs are bundles of 3, 5, or 10 shoots tied with twine and secured with sod staple",Y,Declining; impacted by project but also pre-construction surveys showed decline,437,15.1,21.8,ND,42,ND,NA,NA,"Declining beginning in 2003 pre-construction, changes in beach morphology and erosion/deposition may have contributed",2005,February,Winter,5,semi-seasonally,23,1.5,ND,intertidal transplanting,ND,ND,71,ND,ND,ND,0,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio of 1.5:1,ND,N,"The initial data about the pilot project, the 2005 transplants, etc are included in another report. Basically everything reported from 2007-2009 includes new, replanted, or supplemental plantings. Asked Todd Zackey for Year 2 report that have more details (or so I suspect since it's referenced like a lot in year 3 report)",N,N,N,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Y, sediment accretion, tidal height, changes to beach morphology",NA,Y,Y,"Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Pink salmon, Chum salmon, Forage fish, Starry flounder, Buffalo sculpin, Pile perch, Cutthroat trout, Rock sole, Shiner perch, American shad ","Salmon, Trout, Sole, Flounder, Perch","Yes, they conducted surveys that included number of eggs of forage fish along transect across 8 sampling dates. They also generated size frequency distributions of each of the salmon species they monitored and measured total crustacean and epifauna density (salmonid prey) at reference and created habitats aross two dates.",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_E3_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_E3_2005_28 mo,Grey literature,"Pentec Environmental, Port of Everett",Puget Sound,Possession Sound,47.9,-122.5,WA,"Macroalgae, Graciliaria, Saccharina latissima",N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,3 shoots per PU,"PUs are bundles of 3, 5, or 10 shoots tied with twine and secured with sod staple",Y,Declining; impacted by project but also pre-construction surveys showed decline,437,15.1,21.8,ND,42,ND,NA,NA,"Declining beginning in 2003 pre-construction, changes in beach morphology and erosion/deposition may have contributed",2005,February,Winter,5,semi-seasonally,28,1.5,ND,intertidal transplanting,ND,ND,71,ND,ND,ND,0,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio of 1.5:1,ND,N,"The initial data about the pilot project, the 2005 transplants, etc are included in another report. Basically everything reported from 2007-2009 includes new, replanted, or supplemental plantings. Asked Todd Zackey for Year 2 report that have more details (or so I suspect since it's referenced like a lot in year 3 report)",N,N,N,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Y, sediment accretion, tidal height, changes to beach morphology",NA,Y,Y,"Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Pink salmon, Chum salmon, Forage fish, Starry flounder, Buffalo sculpin, Pile perch, Cutthroat trout, Rock sole, Shiner perch, American shad ","Salmon, Trout, Sole, Flounder, Perch","Yes, they conducted surveys that included number of eggs of forage fish along transect across 8 sampling dates. They also generated size frequency distributions of each of the salmon species they monitored and measured total crustacean and epifauna density (salmonid prey) at reference and created habitats aross two dates.",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_E3_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_E3_2005_36 mo,Grey literature,"Pentec Environmental, Port of Everett",Puget Sound,Possession Sound,47.9,-122.5,WA,"Macroalgae, Graciliaria, Saccharina latissima",N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,3 shoots per PU,"PUs are bundles of 3, 5, or 10 shoots tied with twine and secured with sod staple",Y,Declining; impacted by project but also pre-construction surveys showed decline,437,15.1,21.8,ND,42,ND,NA,NA,"Declining beginning in 2003 pre-construction, changes in beach morphology and erosion/deposition may have contributed",2005,February,Winter,5,semi-seasonally,36,1.5,ND,intertidal transplanting,ND,ND,71,ND,ND,ND,0,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio of 1.5:1,ND,N,"The initial data about the pilot project, the 2005 transplants, etc are included in another report. Basically everything reported from 2007-2009 includes new, replanted, or supplemental plantings. Asked Todd Zackey for Year 2 report that have more details (or so I suspect since it's referenced like a lot in year 3 report)",N,N,N,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Y, sediment accretion, tidal height, changes to beach morphology",NA,Y,Y,"Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Pink salmon, Chum salmon, Forage fish, Starry flounder, Buffalo sculpin, Pile perch, Cutthroat trout, Rock sole, Shiner perch, American shad ","Salmon, Trout, Sole, Flounder, Perch","Yes, they conducted surveys that included number of eggs of forage fish along transect across 8 sampling dates. They also generated size frequency distributions of each of the salmon species they monitored and measured total crustacean and epifauna density (salmonid prey) at reference and created habitats aross two dates.",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_Subtidal Plot A_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_Subtidal Plot A_2005_2 mo,Grey literature,"Pentec Environmental, Port of Everett",Puget Sound,Possession Sound,47.9,-122.5,WA,"Macroalgae, Graciliaria, Saccharina latissima",N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,3 shoots per PU,"PUs are bundles of 3, 5, or 10 shoots tied with twine and secured with sod staple",Y,Declining; impacted by project but also pre-construction surveys showed decline,509,368,37.7,ND,55.2,ND,NA,NA,"Declining beginning in 2003 pre-construction, changes in beach morphology and erosion/deposition may have contributed",2005,April,Spring,2,semi-seasonally,2,1.5,-6.5,subtidal transplants,ND,ND,566,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio of 1.5:1,ND,Y,"The initial data about the pilot project, the 2005 transplants, etc are included in another report. Basically everything reported from 2007-2009 includes new, replanted, or supplemental plantings. Asked Todd Zackey for Year 2 report that have more details (or so I suspect since it's referenced like a lot in year 3 report)",N,N,N,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Y, sediment accretion, tidal height, changes to beach morphology",NA,Y,Y,"Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Pink salmon, Chum salmon, Forage fish, Starry flounder, Buffalo sculpin, Pile perch, Cutthroat trout, Rock sole, Shiner perch, American shad ","Salmon, Trout, Sole, Flounder, Perch","Yes, they conducted surveys that included number of eggs of forage fish along transect across 8 sampling dates. They also generated size frequency distributions of each of the salmon species they monitored and measured total crustacean and epifauna density (salmonid prey) at reference and created habitats aross two dates.",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_Subtidal Plot A_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_Subtidal Plot A_2005_2.5 mo,Grey literature,"Pentec Environmental, Port of Everett",Puget Sound,Possession Sound,47.9,-122.5,WA,"Macroalgae, Graciliaria, Saccharina latissima",N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,3 shoots per PU,"PUs are bundles of 3, 5, or 10 shoots tied with twine and secured with sod staple",Y,Declining; impacted by project but also pre-construction surveys showed decline,509,368,37.7,ND,55.2,ND,NA,NA,"Declining beginning in 2003 pre-construction, changes in beach morphology and erosion/deposition may have contributed",2005,April,Spring,2,semi-seasonally,2.5,1.5,-6.5,subtidal transplants,ND,ND,566,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio of 1.5:1,ND,Y,"The initial data about the pilot project, the 2005 transplants, etc are included in another report. Basically everything reported from 2007-2009 includes new, replanted, or supplemental plantings. Asked Todd Zackey for Year 2 report that have more details (or so I suspect since it's referenced like a lot in year 3 report)",N,N,N,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Y, sediment accretion, tidal height, changes to beach morphology",NA,Y,Y,"Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Pink salmon, Chum salmon, Forage fish, Starry flounder, Buffalo sculpin, Pile perch, Cutthroat trout, Rock sole, Shiner perch, American shad ","Salmon, Trout, Sole, Flounder, Perch","Yes, they conducted surveys that included number of eggs of forage fish along transect across 8 sampling dates. They also generated size frequency distributions of each of the salmon species they monitored and measured total crustacean and epifauna density (salmonid prey) at reference and created habitats aross two dates.",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_Subtidal Plot A_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_Subtidal Plot A_2005_4 mo,Grey literature,"Pentec Environmental, Port of Everett",Puget Sound,Possession Sound,47.9,-122.5,WA,"Macroalgae, Graciliaria, Saccharina latissima",N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,3 shoots per PU,"PUs are bundles of 3, 5, or 10 shoots tied with twine and secured with sod staple",Y,Declining; impacted by project but also pre-construction surveys showed decline,509,368,37.7,ND,55.2,ND,NA,NA,"Declining beginning in 2003 pre-construction, changes in beach morphology and erosion/deposition may have contributed",2005,April,Spring,2,semi-seasonally,4,1.5,-6.5,subtidal transplants,ND,ND,566,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio of 1.5:1,ND,N,"The initial data about the pilot project, the 2005 transplants, etc are included in another report. Basically everything reported from 2007-2009 includes new, replanted, or supplemental plantings. Asked Todd Zackey for Year 2 report that have more details (or so I suspect since it's referenced like a lot in year 3 report)",N,N,N,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Y, sediment accretion, tidal height, changes to beach morphology",NA,Y,Y,"Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Pink salmon, Chum salmon, Forage fish, Starry flounder, Buffalo sculpin, Pile perch, Cutthroat trout, Rock sole, Shiner perch, American shad ","Salmon, Trout, Sole, Flounder, Perch","Yes, they conducted surveys that included number of eggs of forage fish along transect across 8 sampling dates. They also generated size frequency distributions of each of the salmon species they monitored and measured total crustacean and epifauna density (salmonid prey) at reference and created habitats aross two dates.",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_Subtidal Plot A_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_Subtidal Plot A_2005_13 mo,Grey literature,"Pentec Environmental, Port of Everett",Puget Sound,Possession Sound,47.9,-122.5,WA,"Macroalgae, Graciliaria, Saccharina latissima",N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,3 shoots per PU,"PUs are bundles of 3, 5, or 10 shoots tied with twine and secured with sod staple",Y,Declining; impacted by project but also pre-construction surveys showed decline,509,368,37.7,ND,55.2,ND,NA,NA,"Declining beginning in 2003 pre-construction, changes in beach morphology and erosion/deposition may have contributed",2005,April,Spring,2,semi-seasonally,13,1.5,-6.5,subtidal transplants,ND,ND,566,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio of 1.5:1,ND,Y,"The initial data about the pilot project, the 2005 transplants, etc are included in another report. Basically everything reported from 2007-2009 includes new, replanted, or supplemental plantings. Asked Todd Zackey for Year 2 report that have more details (or so I suspect since it's referenced like a lot in year 3 report)",N,N,N,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Y, sediment accretion, tidal height, changes to beach morphology",NA,Y,Y,"Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Pink salmon, Chum salmon, Forage fish, Starry flounder, Buffalo sculpin, Pile perch, Cutthroat trout, Rock sole, Shiner perch, American shad ","Salmon, Trout, Sole, Flounder, Perch","Yes, they conducted surveys that included number of eggs of forage fish along transect across 8 sampling dates. They also generated size frequency distributions of each of the salmon species they monitored and measured total crustacean and epifauna density (salmonid prey) at reference and created habitats aross two dates.",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_Subtidal Plot A_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_Subtidal Plot A_2005_22 mo,Grey literature,"Pentec Environmental, Port of Everett",Puget Sound,Possession Sound,47.9,-122.5,WA,"Macroalgae, Graciliaria, Saccharina latissima",N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,3 shoots per PU,"PUs are bundles of 3, 5, or 10 shoots tied with twine and secured with sod staple",Y,Declining; impacted by project but also pre-construction surveys showed decline,509,368,37.7,ND,55.2,ND,NA,NA,"Declining beginning in 2003 pre-construction, changes in beach morphology and erosion/deposition may have contributed",2005,April,Spring,2,semi-seasonally,22,1.5,-6.5,subtidal transplants,ND,ND,566,35.3,35.3,ND,10.23,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio of 1.5:1,Y,Y,"The initial data about the pilot project, the 2005 transplants, etc are included in another report. Basically everything reported from 2007-2009 includes new, replanted, or supplemental plantings. Asked Todd Zackey for Year 2 report that have more details (or so I suspect since it's referenced like a lot in year 3 report)",N,N,N,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Y, sediment accretion, tidal height, changes to beach morphology",NA,Y,Y,"Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Pink salmon, Chum salmon, Forage fish, Starry flounder, Buffalo sculpin, Pile perch, Cutthroat trout, Rock sole, Shiner perch, American shad ","Salmon, Trout, Sole, Flounder, Perch","Yes, they conducted surveys that included number of eggs of forage fish along transect across 8 sampling dates. They also generated size frequency distributions of each of the salmon species they monitored and measured total crustacean and epifauna density (salmonid prey) at reference and created habitats aross two dates.",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_Subtidal Plot A_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_Subtidal Plot A_2005_27 mo,Grey literature,"Pentec Environmental, Port of Everett",Puget Sound,Possession Sound,47.9,-122.5,WA,"Macroalgae, Graciliaria, Saccharina latissima",N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,3 shoots per PU,"PUs are bundles of 3, 5, or 10 shoots tied with twine and secured with sod staple",Y,Declining; impacted by project but also pre-construction surveys showed decline,509,368,37.7,ND,55.2,ND,NA,NA,"Declining beginning in 2003 pre-construction, changes in beach morphology and erosion/deposition may have contributed",2005,April,Spring,2,semi-seasonally,27,1.5,-6.5,subtidal transplants,ND,ND,566,35.3,ND,ND,40.04,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio of 1.5:1,ND,Y,"The initial data about the pilot project, the 2005 transplants, etc are included in another report. Basically everything reported from 2007-2009 includes new, replanted, or supplemental plantings. Asked Todd Zackey for Year 2 report that have more details (or so I suspect since it's referenced like a lot in year 3 report)",N,N,N,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Y, sediment accretion, tidal height, changes to beach morphology",NA,Y,Y,"Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Pink salmon, Chum salmon, Forage fish, Starry flounder, Buffalo sculpin, Pile perch, Cutthroat trout, Rock sole, Shiner perch, American shad ","Salmon, Trout, Sole, Flounder, Perch","Yes, they conducted surveys that included number of eggs of forage fish along transect across 8 sampling dates. They also generated size frequency distributions of each of the salmon species they monitored and measured total crustacean and epifauna density (salmonid prey) at reference and created habitats aross two dates.",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_Subtidal Plot A_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_Subtidal Plot A_2005_40 mo,Grey literature,"Pentec Environmental, Port of Everett",Puget Sound,Possession Sound,47.9,-122.5,WA,"Macroalgae, Graciliaria, Saccharina latissima",N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,3 shoots per PU,"PUs are bundles of 3, 5, or 10 shoots tied with twine and secured with sod staple",Y,Declining; impacted by project but also pre-construction surveys showed decline,509,368,37.7,ND,55.2,ND,NA,NA,"Declining beginning in 2003 pre-construction, changes in beach morphology and erosion/deposition may have contributed",2005,April,Spring,2,semi-seasonally,40,1.5,-6.5,subtidal transplants,ND,ND,566,35.3,ND,ND,23.79,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio of 1.5:1,ND,Y,"The initial data about the pilot project, the 2005 transplants, etc are included in another report. Basically everything reported from 2007-2009 includes new, replanted, or supplemental plantings. Asked Todd Zackey for Year 2 report that have more details (or so I suspect since it's referenced like a lot in year 3 report)",N,N,N,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Y, sediment accretion, tidal height, changes to beach morphology",NA,Y,Y,"Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Pink salmon, Chum salmon, Forage fish, Starry flounder, Buffalo sculpin, Pile perch, Cutthroat trout, Rock sole, Shiner perch, American shad ","Salmon, Trout, Sole, Flounder, Perch","Yes, they conducted surveys that included number of eggs of forage fish along transect across 8 sampling dates. They also generated size frequency distributions of each of the salmon species they monitored and measured total crustacean and epifauna density (salmonid prey) at reference and created habitats aross two dates.",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_Subtidal Plot B_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_Subtidal Plot B_2005_2 mo,Grey literature,"Pentec Environmental, Port of Everett",Puget Sound,Possession Sound,47.9,-122.5,WA,"Macroalgae, Graciliaria, Saccharina latissima",N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,3 shoots per PU,"PUs are bundles of 3, 5, or 10 shoots tied with twine and secured with sod staple",Y,Declining; impacted by project but also pre-construction surveys showed decline,509,368,37.7,ND,55.2,ND,NA,NA,"Declining beginning in 2003 pre-construction, changes in beach morphology and erosion/deposition may have contributed",2005,April,Spring,2,semi-seasonally,2,1.5,-6.5,subtidal transplants,ND,ND,571,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio of 1.5:1,ND,Y,"The initial data about the pilot project, the 2005 transplants, etc are included in another report. Basically everything reported from 2007-2009 includes new, replanted, or supplemental plantings. Asked Todd Zackey for Year 2 report that have more details (or so I suspect since it's referenced like a lot in year 3 report)",N,N,N,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Y, sediment accretion, tidal height, changes to beach morphology",NA,Y,Y,"Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Pink salmon, Chum salmon, Forage fish, Starry flounder, Buffalo sculpin, Pile perch, Cutthroat trout, Rock sole, Shiner perch, American shad ","Salmon, Trout, Sole, Flounder, Perch","Yes, they conducted surveys that included number of eggs of forage fish along transect across 8 sampling dates. They also generated size frequency distributions of each of the salmon species they monitored and measured total crustacean and epifauna density (salmonid prey) at reference and created habitats aross two dates.",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_Subtidal Plot B_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_Subtidal Plot B_2005_2.5 mo,Grey literature,"Pentec Environmental, Port of Everett",Puget Sound,Possession Sound,47.9,-122.5,WA,"Macroalgae, Graciliaria, Saccharina latissima",N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,3 shoots per PU,"PUs are bundles of 3, 5, or 10 shoots tied with twine and secured with sod staple",Y,Declining; impacted by project but also pre-construction surveys showed decline,509,368,37.7,ND,55.2,ND,NA,NA,"Declining beginning in 2003 pre-construction, changes in beach morphology and erosion/deposition may have contributed",2005,April,Spring,2,semi-seasonally,2.5,1.5,-6.5,subtidal transplants,ND,ND,571,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio of 1.5:1,ND,N,"The initial data about the pilot project, the 2005 transplants, etc are included in another report. Basically everything reported from 2007-2009 includes new, replanted, or supplemental plantings. Asked Todd Zackey for Year 2 report that have more details (or so I suspect since it's referenced like a lot in year 3 report)",N,N,N,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Y, sediment accretion, tidal height, changes to beach morphology",NA,Y,Y,"Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Pink salmon, Chum salmon, Forage fish, Starry flounder, Buffalo sculpin, Pile perch, Cutthroat trout, Rock sole, Shiner perch, American shad ","Salmon, Trout, Sole, Flounder, Perch","Yes, they conducted surveys that included number of eggs of forage fish along transect across 8 sampling dates. They also generated size frequency distributions of each of the salmon species they monitored and measured total crustacean and epifauna density (salmonid prey) at reference and created habitats aross two dates.",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_Subtidal Plot B_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_Subtidal Plot B_2005_4 mo,Grey literature,"Pentec Environmental, Port of Everett",Puget Sound,Possession Sound,47.9,-122.5,WA,"Macroalgae, Graciliaria, Saccharina latissima",N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,3 shoots per PU,"PUs are bundles of 3, 5, or 10 shoots tied with twine and secured with sod staple",Y,Declining; impacted by project but also pre-construction surveys showed decline,509,368,37.7,ND,55.2,ND,NA,NA,"Declining beginning in 2003 pre-construction, changes in beach morphology and erosion/deposition may have contributed",2005,April,Spring,2,semi-seasonally,4,1.5,-6.5,subtidal transplants,ND,ND,571,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio of 1.5:1,ND,Y,"The initial data about the pilot project, the 2005 transplants, etc are included in another report. Basically everything reported from 2007-2009 includes new, replanted, or supplemental plantings. Asked Todd Zackey for Year 2 report that have more details (or so I suspect since it's referenced like a lot in year 3 report)",N,N,N,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Y, sediment accretion, tidal height, changes to beach morphology",NA,Y,Y,"Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Pink salmon, Chum salmon, Forage fish, Starry flounder, Buffalo sculpin, Pile perch, Cutthroat trout, Rock sole, Shiner perch, American shad ","Salmon, Trout, Sole, Flounder, Perch","Yes, they conducted surveys that included number of eggs of forage fish along transect across 8 sampling dates. They also generated size frequency distributions of each of the salmon species they monitored and measured total crustacean and epifauna density (salmonid prey) at reference and created habitats aross two dates.",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_Subtidal Plot B_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_Subtidal Plot B_2005_13 mo,Grey literature,"Pentec Environmental, Port of Everett",Puget Sound,Possession Sound,47.9,-122.5,WA,"Macroalgae, Graciliaria, Saccharina latissima",N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,3 shoots per PU,"PUs are bundles of 3, 5, or 10 shoots tied with twine and secured with sod staple",Y,Declining; impacted by project but also pre-construction surveys showed decline,509,368,37.7,ND,55.2,ND,NA,NA,"Declining beginning in 2003 pre-construction, changes in beach morphology and erosion/deposition may have contributed",2005,April,Spring,2,semi-seasonally,13,1.5,-6.5,subtidal transplants,ND,ND,571,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio of 1.5:1,ND,Y,"The initial data about the pilot project, the 2005 transplants, etc are included in another report. Basically everything reported from 2007-2009 includes new, replanted, or supplemental plantings. Asked Todd Zackey for Year 2 report that have more details (or so I suspect since it's referenced like a lot in year 3 report)",N,N,N,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Y, sediment accretion, tidal height, changes to beach morphology",NA,Y,Y,"Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Pink salmon, Chum salmon, Forage fish, Starry flounder, Buffalo sculpin, Pile perch, Cutthroat trout, Rock sole, Shiner perch, American shad ","Salmon, Trout, Sole, Flounder, Perch","Yes, they conducted surveys that included number of eggs of forage fish along transect across 8 sampling dates. They also generated size frequency distributions of each of the salmon species they monitored and measured total crustacean and epifauna density (salmonid prey) at reference and created habitats aross two dates.",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_Subtidal Plot B_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_Subtidal Plot B_2005_22 mo,Grey literature,"Pentec Environmental, Port of Everett",Puget Sound,Possession Sound,47.9,-122.5,WA,"Macroalgae, Graciliaria, Saccharina latissima",N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,3 shoots per PU,"PUs are bundles of 3, 5, or 10 shoots tied with twine and secured with sod staple",Y,Declining; impacted by project but also pre-construction surveys showed decline,509,368,37.7,ND,55.2,ND,NA,NA,"Declining beginning in 2003 pre-construction, changes in beach morphology and erosion/deposition may have contributed",2005,April,Spring,2,semi-seasonally,22,1.5,-6.5,subtidal transplants,ND,ND,571,35.3,35.3,ND,10.33,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio of 1.5:1,N,N,"The initial data about the pilot project, the 2005 transplants, etc are included in another report. Basically everything reported from 2007-2009 includes new, replanted, or supplemental plantings. Asked Todd Zackey for Year 2 report that have more details (or so I suspect since it's referenced like a lot in year 3 report)",N,N,N,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Y, sediment accretion, tidal height, changes to beach morphology",NA,Y,Y,"Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Pink salmon, Chum salmon, Forage fish, Starry flounder, Buffalo sculpin, Pile perch, Cutthroat trout, Rock sole, Shiner perch, American shad ","Salmon, Trout, Sole, Flounder, Perch","Yes, they conducted surveys that included number of eggs of forage fish along transect across 8 sampling dates. They also generated size frequency distributions of each of the salmon species they monitored and measured total crustacean and epifauna density (salmonid prey) at reference and created habitats aross two dates.",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_Subtidal Plot B_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_Subtidal Plot B_2005_27 mo,Grey literature,"Pentec Environmental, Port of Everett",Puget Sound,Possession Sound,47.9,-122.5,WA,"Macroalgae, Graciliaria, Saccharina latissima",N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,3 shoots per PU,"PUs are bundles of 3, 5, or 10 shoots tied with twine and secured with sod staple",Y,Declining; impacted by project but also pre-construction surveys showed decline,509,368,37.7,ND,55.2,ND,NA,NA,"Declining beginning in 2003 pre-construction, changes in beach morphology and erosion/deposition may have contributed",2005,April,Spring,2,semi-seasonally,27,1.5,-6.5,subtidal transplants,ND,ND,571,35.3,ND,ND,25.19,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio of 1.5:1,ND,N,"The initial data about the pilot project, the 2005 transplants, etc are included in another report. Basically everything reported from 2007-2009 includes new, replanted, or supplemental plantings. Asked Todd Zackey for Year 2 report that have more details (or so I suspect since it's referenced like a lot in year 3 report)",N,N,N,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Y, sediment accretion, tidal height, changes to beach morphology",NA,Y,Y,"Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Pink salmon, Chum salmon, Forage fish, Starry flounder, Buffalo sculpin, Pile perch, Cutthroat trout, Rock sole, Shiner perch, American shad ","Salmon, Trout, Sole, Flounder, Perch","Yes, they conducted surveys that included number of eggs of forage fish along transect across 8 sampling dates. They also generated size frequency distributions of each of the salmon species they monitored and measured total crustacean and epifauna density (salmonid prey) at reference and created habitats aross two dates.",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_Subtidal Plot B_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_Subtidal Plot B_2005_40 mo,Grey literature,"Pentec Environmental, Port of Everett",Puget Sound,Possession Sound,47.9,-122.5,WA,"Macroalgae, Graciliaria, Saccharina latissima",N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,3 shoots per PU,"PUs are bundles of 3, 5, or 10 shoots tied with twine and secured with sod staple",Y,Declining; impacted by project but also pre-construction surveys showed decline,509,368,37.7,ND,55.2,ND,NA,NA,"Declining beginning in 2003 pre-construction, changes in beach morphology and erosion/deposition may have contributed",2005,April,Spring,2,semi-seasonally,40,1.5,-6.5,subtidal transplants,ND,ND,571,35.3,ND,ND,31.22,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio of 1.5:1,ND,N,"The initial data about the pilot project, the 2005 transplants, etc are included in another report. Basically everything reported from 2007-2009 includes new, replanted, or supplemental plantings. Asked Todd Zackey for Year 2 report that have more details (or so I suspect since it's referenced like a lot in year 3 report)",N,N,N,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Y, sediment accretion, tidal height, changes to beach morphology",NA,Y,Y,"Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Pink salmon, Chum salmon, Forage fish, Starry flounder, Buffalo sculpin, Pile perch, Cutthroat trout, Rock sole, Shiner perch, American shad ","Salmon, Trout, Sole, Flounder, Perch","Yes, they conducted surveys that included number of eggs of forage fish along transect across 8 sampling dates. They also generated size frequency distributions of each of the salmon species they monitored and measured total crustacean and epifauna density (salmonid prey) at reference and created habitats aross two dates.",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_Subtidal Plot C_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_Subtidal Plot C_2005_2 mo,Grey literature,"Pentec Environmental, Port of Everett",Puget Sound,Possession Sound,47.9,-122.5,WA,"Macroalgae, Graciliaria, Saccharina latissima",N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,3 shoots per PU,"PUs are bundles of 3, 5, or 10 shoots tied with twine and secured with sod staple",Y,Declining; impacted by project but also pre-construction surveys showed decline,509,368,37.7,ND,55.2,ND,NA,NA,"Declining beginning in 2003 pre-construction, changes in beach morphology and erosion/deposition may have contributed",2005,April,Spring,2,semi-seasonally,2,1.5,-6.5,subtidal transplants,ND,ND,584,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio of 1.5:1,ND,N,"The initial data about the pilot project, the 2005 transplants, etc are included in another report. Basically everything reported from 2007-2009 includes new, replanted, or supplemental plantings. Asked Todd Zackey for Year 2 report that have more details (or so I suspect since it's referenced like a lot in year 3 report)",N,N,N,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Y, sediment accretion, tidal height, changes to beach morphology",NA,Y,Y,"Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Pink salmon, Chum salmon, Forage fish, Starry flounder, Buffalo sculpin, Pile perch, Cutthroat trout, Rock sole, Shiner perch, American shad ","Salmon, Trout, Sole, Flounder, Perch","Yes, they conducted surveys that included number of eggs of forage fish along transect across 8 sampling dates. They also generated size frequency distributions of each of the salmon species they monitored and measured total crustacean and epifauna density (salmonid prey) at reference and created habitats aross two dates.",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_Subtidal Plot C_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_Subtidal Plot C_2005_2.5 mo,Grey literature,"Pentec Environmental, Port of Everett",Puget Sound,Possession Sound,47.9,-122.5,WA,"Macroalgae, Graciliaria, Saccharina latissima",N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,3 shoots per PU,"PUs are bundles of 3, 5, or 10 shoots tied with twine and secured with sod staple",Y,Declining; impacted by project but also pre-construction surveys showed decline,509,368,37.7,ND,55.2,ND,NA,NA,"Declining beginning in 2003 pre-construction, changes in beach morphology and erosion/deposition may have contributed",2005,April,Spring,2,semi-seasonally,2.5,1.5,-6.5,subtidal transplants,ND,ND,584,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio of 1.5:1,ND,N,"The initial data about the pilot project, the 2005 transplants, etc are included in another report. Basically everything reported from 2007-2009 includes new, replanted, or supplemental plantings. Asked Todd Zackey for Year 2 report that have more details (or so I suspect since it's referenced like a lot in year 3 report)",N,N,N,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Y, sediment accretion, tidal height, changes to beach morphology",NA,Y,Y,"Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Pink salmon, Chum salmon, Forage fish, Starry flounder, Buffalo sculpin, Pile perch, Cutthroat trout, Rock sole, Shiner perch, American shad ","Salmon, Trout, Sole, Flounder, Perch","Yes, they conducted surveys that included number of eggs of forage fish along transect across 8 sampling dates. They also generated size frequency distributions of each of the salmon species they monitored and measured total crustacean and epifauna density (salmonid prey) at reference and created habitats aross two dates.",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_Subtidal Plot C_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_Subtidal Plot C_2005_4 mo,Grey literature,"Pentec Environmental, Port of Everett",Puget Sound,Possession Sound,47.9,-122.5,WA,"Macroalgae, Graciliaria, Saccharina latissima",N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,3 shoots per PU,"PUs are bundles of 3, 5, or 10 shoots tied with twine and secured with sod staple",Y,Declining; impacted by project but also pre-construction surveys showed decline,509,368,37.7,ND,55.2,ND,NA,NA,"Declining beginning in 2003 pre-construction, changes in beach morphology and erosion/deposition may have contributed",2005,April,Spring,2,semi-seasonally,4,1.5,-6.5,subtidal transplants,ND,ND,584,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio of 1.5:1,ND,N,"The initial data about the pilot project, the 2005 transplants, etc are included in another report. Basically everything reported from 2007-2009 includes new, replanted, or supplemental plantings. Asked Todd Zackey for Year 2 report that have more details (or so I suspect since it's referenced like a lot in year 3 report)",N,N,N,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Y, sediment accretion, tidal height, changes to beach morphology",NA,Y,Y,"Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Pink salmon, Chum salmon, Forage fish, Starry flounder, Buffalo sculpin, Pile perch, Cutthroat trout, Rock sole, Shiner perch, American shad ","Salmon, Trout, Sole, Flounder, Perch","Yes, they conducted surveys that included number of eggs of forage fish along transect across 8 sampling dates. They also generated size frequency distributions of each of the salmon species they monitored and measured total crustacean and epifauna density (salmonid prey) at reference and created habitats aross two dates.",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_Subtidal Plot C_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_Subtidal Plot C_2005_13 mo,Grey literature,"Pentec Environmental, Port of Everett",Puget Sound,Possession Sound,47.9,-122.5,WA,"Macroalgae, Graciliaria, Saccharina latissima",N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,3 shoots per PU,"PUs are bundles of 3, 5, or 10 shoots tied with twine and secured with sod staple",Y,Declining; impacted by project but also pre-construction surveys showed decline,509,368,37.7,ND,55.2,ND,NA,NA,"Declining beginning in 2003 pre-construction, changes in beach morphology and erosion/deposition may have contributed",2005,April,Spring,2,semi-seasonally,13,1.5,-6.5,subtidal transplants,ND,ND,584,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio of 1.5:1,ND,N,"The initial data about the pilot project, the 2005 transplants, etc are included in another report. Basically everything reported from 2007-2009 includes new, replanted, or supplemental plantings. Asked Todd Zackey for Year 2 report that have more details (or so I suspect since it's referenced like a lot in year 3 report)",N,N,N,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Y, sediment accretion, tidal height, changes to beach morphology",NA,Y,Y,"Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Pink salmon, Chum salmon, Forage fish, Starry flounder, Buffalo sculpin, Pile perch, Cutthroat trout, Rock sole, Shiner perch, American shad ","Salmon, Trout, Sole, Flounder, Perch","Yes, they conducted surveys that included number of eggs of forage fish along transect across 8 sampling dates. They also generated size frequency distributions of each of the salmon species they monitored and measured total crustacean and epifauna density (salmonid prey) at reference and created habitats aross two dates.",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_Subtidal Plot C_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_Subtidal Plot C_2005_22 mo,Grey literature,"Pentec Environmental, Port of Everett",Puget Sound,Possession Sound,47.9,-122.5,WA,"Macroalgae, Graciliaria, Saccharina latissima",N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,3 shoots per PU,"PUs are bundles of 3, 5, or 10 shoots tied with twine and secured with sod staple",Y,Declining; impacted by project but also pre-construction surveys showed decline,509,368,37.7,ND,55.2,ND,NA,NA,"Declining beginning in 2003 pre-construction, changes in beach morphology and erosion/deposition may have contributed",2005,April,Spring,2,semi-seasonally,22,1.5,-6.5,subtidal transplants,ND,ND,584,0,ND,ND,0,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio of 1.5:1,ND,N,"The initial data about the pilot project, the 2005 transplants, etc are included in another report. Basically everything reported from 2007-2009 includes new, replanted, or supplemental plantings. Asked Todd Zackey for Year 2 report that have more details (or so I suspect since it's referenced like a lot in year 3 report)",N,N,N,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Y, sediment accretion, tidal height, changes to beach morphology",NA,Y,Y,"Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Pink salmon, Chum salmon, Forage fish, Starry flounder, Buffalo sculpin, Pile perch, Cutthroat trout, Rock sole, Shiner perch, American shad ","Salmon, Trout, Sole, Flounder, Perch","Yes, they conducted surveys that included number of eggs of forage fish along transect across 8 sampling dates. They also generated size frequency distributions of each of the salmon species they monitored and measured total crustacean and epifauna density (salmonid prey) at reference and created habitats aross two dates.",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_Subtidal Plot C_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_Subtidal Plot C_2005_27 mo,Grey literature,"Pentec Environmental, Port of Everett",Puget Sound,Possession Sound,47.9,-122.5,WA,"Macroalgae, Graciliaria, Saccharina latissima",N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,3 shoots per PU,"PUs are bundles of 3, 5, or 10 shoots tied with twine and secured with sod staple",Y,Declining; impacted by project but also pre-construction surveys showed decline,509,368,37.7,ND,55.2,ND,NA,NA,"Declining beginning in 2003 pre-construction, changes in beach morphology and erosion/deposition may have contributed",2005,April,Spring,2,semi-seasonally,27,1.5,-6.5,subtidal transplants,ND,ND,584,0,ND,ND,0,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio of 1.5:1,ND,N,"The initial data about the pilot project, the 2005 transplants, etc are included in another report. Basically everything reported from 2007-2009 includes new, replanted, or supplemental plantings. Asked Todd Zackey for Year 2 report that have more details (or so I suspect since it's referenced like a lot in year 3 report)",N,N,N,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Y, sediment accretion, tidal height, changes to beach morphology",NA,Y,Y,"Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Pink salmon, Chum salmon, Forage fish, Starry flounder, Buffalo sculpin, Pile perch, Cutthroat trout, Rock sole, Shiner perch, American shad ","Salmon, Trout, Sole, Flounder, Perch","Yes, they conducted surveys that included number of eggs of forage fish along transect across 8 sampling dates. They also generated size frequency distributions of each of the salmon species they monitored and measured total crustacean and epifauna density (salmonid prey) at reference and created habitats aross two dates.",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_Subtidal Plot C_2005,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_Subtidal Plot C_2005_40 mo,Grey literature,"Pentec Environmental, Port of Everett",Puget Sound,Possession Sound,47.9,-122.5,WA,"Macroalgae, Graciliaria, Saccharina latissima",N,Mitigation,Active,Y,Garden Staple,3 shoots per PU,"PUs are bundles of 3, 5, or 10 shoots tied with twine and secured with sod staple",Y,Declining; impacted by project but also pre-construction surveys showed decline,509,368,37.7,ND,55.2,ND,NA,NA,"Declining beginning in 2003 pre-construction, changes in beach morphology and erosion/deposition may have contributed",2005,April,Spring,2,semi-seasonally,40,1.5,-6.5,subtidal transplants,ND,ND,584,0,ND,ND,0,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio of 1.5:1,ND,N,"The initial data about the pilot project, the 2005 transplants, etc are included in another report. Basically everything reported from 2007-2009 includes new, replanted, or supplemental plantings. Asked Todd Zackey for Year 2 report that have more details (or so I suspect since it's referenced like a lot in year 3 report)",N,N,N,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Y, sediment accretion, tidal height, changes to beach morphology",NA,Y,Y,"Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Pink salmon, Chum salmon, Forage fish, Starry flounder, Buffalo sculpin, Pile perch, Cutthroat trout, Rock sole, Shiner perch, American shad ","Salmon, Trout, Sole, Flounder, Perch","Yes, they conducted surveys that included number of eggs of forage fish along transect across 8 sampling dates. They also generated size frequency distributions of each of the salmon species they monitored and measured total crustacean and epifauna density (salmonid prey) at reference and created habitats aross two dates.",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_2007,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_Subtidal Plot D_2007,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_Subtidal Plot D_2007_5 mo,Grey literature,"Pentec Environmental, Port of Everett",Puget Sound,Possession Sound,47.9,-122.5,WA,"Macroalgae, Graciliaria, Saccharina latissima",N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,3 shoots per PU,"PUs are bundles of 3, 5, or 10 shoots tied with twine and secured with sod staple",Y,Declining; impacted by project but also pre-construction surveys showed decline,509,368,37.7,ND,55.2,ND,NA,NA,"Declining beginning in 2003 pre-construction, changes in beach morphology and erosion/deposition may have contributed",2007,April,Spring,2,semi-seasonally,5,1.5,-6.5,subtidal transplants,ND,ND,288,35.3,ND,8.18057544,24.65,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio of 1.5:1,ND,N,"The initial data about the pilot project, the 2005 transplants, etc are included in another report. Basically everything reported from 2007-2009 includes new, replanted, or supplemental plantings. Asked Todd Zackey for Year 2 report that have more details (or so I suspect since it's referenced like a lot in year 3 report)",N,N,N,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Y, sediment accretion, tidal height, changes to beach morphology",NA,Y,Y,"Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Pink salmon, Chum salmon, Forage fish, Starry flounder, Buffalo sculpin, Pile perch, Cutthroat trout, Rock sole, Shiner perch, American shad ","Salmon, Trout, Sole, Flounder, Perch","Yes, they conducted surveys that included number of eggs of forage fish along transect across 8 sampling dates. They also generated size frequency distributions of each of the salmon species they monitored and measured total crustacean and epifauna density (salmonid prey) at reference and created habitats aross two dates.",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_2007,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_Subtidal Plot D_2007,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_Subtidal Plot D_2007_16 mo,Grey literature,"Pentec Environmental, Port of Everett",Puget Sound,Possession Sound,47.9,-122.5,WA,"Macroalgae, Graciliaria, Saccharina latissima",N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,3 shoots per PU,"PUs are bundles of 3, 5, or 10 shoots tied with twine and secured with sod staple",Y,Declining; impacted by project but also pre-construction surveys showed decline,509,368,37.7,ND,55.2,ND,NA,NA,"Declining beginning in 2003 pre-construction, changes in beach morphology and erosion/deposition may have contributed",2007,April,Spring,2,semi-seasonally,16,1.5,-6.5,subtidal transplants,ND,ND,288,35.3,ND,8.18057544,30.03,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio of 1.5:1,ND,N,"The initial data about the pilot project, the 2005 transplants, etc are included in another report. Basically everything reported from 2007-2009 includes new, replanted, or supplemental plantings. Asked Todd Zackey for Year 2 report that have more details (or so I suspect since it's referenced like a lot in year 3 report)",N,N,N,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Y, sediment accretion, tidal height, changes to beach morphology",NA,Y,Y,"Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Pink salmon, Chum salmon, Forage fish, Starry flounder, Buffalo sculpin, Pile perch, Cutthroat trout, Rock sole, Shiner perch, American shad ","Salmon, Trout, Sole, Flounder, Perch","Yes, they conducted surveys that included number of eggs of forage fish along transect across 8 sampling dates. They also generated size frequency distributions of each of the salmon species they monitored and measured total crustacean and epifauna density (salmonid prey) at reference and created habitats aross two dates.",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_2007,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_Subtidal Plot E_2007,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_Subtidal Plot E_2007_5 mo,Grey literature,"Pentec Environmental, Port of Everett",Puget Sound,Possession Sound,47.9,-122.5,WA,"Macroalgae, Graciliaria, Saccharina latissima",N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,10 shoots per PU,"PUs are bundles of 3, 5, or 10 shoots tied with twine and secured with sod staple",Y,Declining; impacted by project but also pre-construction surveys showed decline,509,368,37.7,ND,55.2,ND,NA,NA,"Declining beginning in 2003 pre-construction, changes in beach morphology and erosion/deposition may have contributed",2007,April,Spring,2,semi-seasonally,5,1.5,-6.5,subtidal transplants,ND,ND,360,30.1,ND,11.9479457,32.61,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio of 1.5:1,ND,N,"The initial data about the pilot project, the 2005 transplants, etc are included in another report. Basically everything reported from 2007-2009 includes new, replanted, or supplemental plantings. Asked Todd Zackey for Year 2 report that have more details (or so I suspect since it's referenced like a lot in year 3 report)",N,N,N,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Y, sediment accretion, tidal height, changes to beach morphology",NA,Y,Y,"Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Pink salmon, Chum salmon, Forage fish, Starry flounder, Buffalo sculpin, Pile perch, Cutthroat trout, Rock sole, Shiner perch, American shad ","Salmon, Trout, Sole, Flounder, Perch","Yes, they conducted surveys that included number of eggs of forage fish along transect across 8 sampling dates. They also generated size frequency distributions of each of the salmon species they monitored and measured total crustacean and epifauna density (salmonid prey) at reference and created habitats aross two dates.",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_2007,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_Subtidal Plot E_2007,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_Subtidal Plot E_2007_16 mo,Grey literature,"Pentec Environmental, Port of Everett",Puget Sound,Possession Sound,47.9,-122.5,WA,"Macroalgae, Graciliaria, Saccharina latissima",N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,10 shoots per PU,"PUs are bundles of 3, 5, or 10 shoots tied with twine and secured with sod staple",Y,Declining; impacted by project but also pre-construction surveys showed decline,509,368,37.7,ND,55.2,ND,NA,NA,"Declining beginning in 2003 pre-construction, changes in beach morphology and erosion/deposition may have contributed",2007,April,Spring,2,semi-seasonally,16,1.5,-6.5,subtidal transplants,ND,ND,360,30.1,ND,11.9479457,30.57,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio of 1.5:1,ND,N,"The initial data about the pilot project, the 2005 transplants, etc are included in another report. Basically everything reported from 2007-2009 includes new, replanted, or supplemental plantings. Asked Todd Zackey for Year 2 report that have more details (or so I suspect since it's referenced like a lot in year 3 report)",N,N,N,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Y, sediment accretion, tidal height, changes to beach morphology",NA,Y,Y,"Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Pink salmon, Chum salmon, Forage fish, Starry flounder, Buffalo sculpin, Pile perch, Cutthroat trout, Rock sole, Shiner perch, American shad ","Salmon, Trout, Sole, Flounder, Perch","Yes, they conducted surveys that included number of eggs of forage fish along transect across 8 sampling dates. They also generated size frequency distributions of each of the salmon species they monitored and measured total crustacean and epifauna density (salmonid prey) at reference and created habitats aross two dates.",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_2007,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_Subtidal Plot F_2007,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_Subtidal Plot F_2007_5 mo,Grey literature,"Pentec Environmental, Port of Everett",Puget Sound,Possession Sound,47.9,-122.5,WA,"Macroalgae, Graciliaria, Saccharina latissima",N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,10 shoots per PU,"PUs are bundles of 3, 5, or 10 shoots tied with twine and secured with sod staple",Y,Declining; impacted by project but also pre-construction surveys showed decline,509,368,37.7,ND,55.2,ND,NA,NA,"Declining beginning in 2003 pre-construction, changes in beach morphology and erosion/deposition may have contributed",2007,April,Spring,2,semi-seasonally,5,1.5,-6.5,subtidal transplants,ND,ND,220,18.4,ND,11.9479457,15.5,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio of 1.5:1,ND,N,"The initial data about the pilot project, the 2005 transplants, etc are included in another report. Basically everything reported from 2007-2009 includes new, replanted, or supplemental plantings. Asked Todd Zackey for Year 2 report that have more details (or so I suspect since it's referenced like a lot in year 3 report)",N,N,N,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Y, sediment accretion, tidal height, changes to beach morphology",NA,Y,Y,"Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Pink salmon, Chum salmon, Forage fish, Starry flounder, Buffalo sculpin, Pile perch, Cutthroat trout, Rock sole, Shiner perch, American shad ","Salmon, Trout, Sole, Flounder, Perch","Yes, they conducted surveys that included number of eggs of forage fish along transect across 8 sampling dates. They also generated size frequency distributions of each of the salmon species they monitored and measured total crustacean and epifauna density (salmonid prey) at reference and created habitats aross two dates.",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_2007,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_Subtidal Plot F_2007,Mount_Baker_Terminal_Mitigation_Subtidal Plot F_2007_16 mo,Grey literature,"Pentec Environmental, Port of Everett",Puget Sound,Possession Sound,47.9,-122.5,WA,"Macroalgae, Graciliaria, Saccharina latissima",N,Mitigation,Active,N,Garden Staple,10 shoots per PU,"PUs are bundles of 3, 5, or 10 shoots tied with twine and secured with sod staple",Y,Declining; impacted by project but also pre-construction surveys showed decline,509,368,37.7,ND,55.2,ND,NA,NA,"Declining beginning in 2003 pre-construction, changes in beach morphology and erosion/deposition may have contributed",2007,April,Spring,2,semi-seasonally,16,1.5,-6.5,subtidal transplants,ND,ND,220,18.4,ND,11.9479457,1.4,ND,ND,NA,Meet mitigation ratio of 1.5:1,ND,N,"The initial data about the pilot project, the 2005 transplants, etc are included in another report. Basically everything reported from 2007-2009 includes new, replanted, or supplemental plantings. Asked Todd Zackey for Year 2 report that have more details (or so I suspect since it's referenced like a lot in year 3 report)",N,N,N,N,Y,N,Y,N,N,"Y, sediment accretion, tidal height, changes to beach morphology",NA,Y,Y,"Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, Pink salmon, Chum salmon, Forage fish, Starry flounder, Buffalo sculpin, Pile perch, Cutthroat trout, Rock sole, Shiner perch, American shad ","Salmon, Trout, Sole, Flounder, Perch","Yes, they conducted surveys that included number of eggs of forage fish along transect across 8 sampling dates. They also generated size frequency distributions of each of the salmon species they monitored and measured total crustacean and epifauna density (salmonid prey) at reference and created habitats aross two dates.",ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_Living_Shorelines,SF_Living_Shorelines_TNC_EG_PSP,SF_Living_Shorelines_TNC_EG_PSP_12mo,Grey literature,"Living Shorelines (SCC), NOAA, SFSU",San Francisco,San Rafael Shoreline ('TNC'),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Green crabs,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo Stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,"Replanted in 2013 after 2012 plots ""did not succeed""",Y,Point San Pablo,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,2013,Late July-August,Summer,3,approximately every 3 months,12,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,576,54,ND,10.667,4.52,ND,ND,NA,Successful establishment,ND,Y,"There was no explicit shoot density success criteria so, if > 1 shoot/plot, made it Y otherwise, N",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,It's hard to believe they didn't measure any of these environmental parameters--I think that they probably did just don't focus on reporting that here.,Y,Y,"Romaleon antennariuum, Cancer productus, Emiotoca jacksoni, Syngnathus leptorhynchus, Cymatogaster aggregata, Triakis semifasciata, Moron saxatilis, Onchorhyncus mykiss, Acipenser medirostris","Red rock crab, Perch, Steelhead, Striped bass, Sturgeon",Quantitative: deployed traps ,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_Living_Shorelines,SF_Living_Shorelines_TNC_EG_PSP,SF_Living_Shorelines_TNC_EG_PSP_15mo,Grey literature,"Living Shorelines (SCC), NOAA, SFSU",San Francisco,San Rafael Shoreline ('TNC'),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Green crabs,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo Stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,"Replanted in 2013 after 2012 plots ""did not succeed""",Y,Point San Pablo,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,2013,Late July-August,Summer,3,approximately every 3 months,15,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,576,54,ND,10.667,4.46,ND,ND,NA,Successful establishment,ND,Y,"There was no explicit shoot density success criteria so, if > 1 shoot/plot, made it Y otherwise, N",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,It's hard to believe they didn't measure any of these environmental parameters--I think that they probably did just don't focus on reporting that here.,Y,Y,"Romaleon antennariuum, Cancer productus, Emiotoca jacksoni, Syngnathus leptorhynchus, Cymatogaster aggregata, Triakis semifasciata, Moron saxatilis, Onchorhyncus mykiss, Acipenser medirostris","Red rock crab, Perch, Steelhead, Striped bass, Sturgeon",Quantitative: deployed traps ,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_Living_Shorelines,SF_Living_Shorelines_TNC_EG_PSP,SF_Living_Shorelines_TNC_EG_PSP_18mo,Grey literature,"Living Shorelines (SCC), NOAA, SFSU",San Francisco,San Rafael Shoreline ('TNC'),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Green crabs,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo Stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,"Replanted in 2013 after 2012 plots ""did not succeed""",Y,Point San Pablo,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,2013,Late July-August,Summer,3,approximately every 3 months,18,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,576,54,ND,10.667,11.06,ND,ND,NA,Successful establishment,ND,Y,"There was no explicit shoot density success criteria so, if > 1 shoot/plot, made it Y otherwise, N",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,It's hard to believe they didn't measure any of these environmental parameters--I think that they probably did just don't focus on reporting that here.,Y,Y,"Romaleon antennariuum, Cancer productus, Emiotoca jacksoni, Syngnathus leptorhynchus, Cymatogaster aggregata, Triakis semifasciata, Moron saxatilis, Onchorhyncus mykiss, Acipenser medirostris","Red rock crab, Perch, Steelhead, Striped bass, Sturgeon",Quantitative: deployed traps ,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_Living_Shorelines,SF_Living_Shorelines_TNC_EG_PSP,SF_Living_Shorelines_TNC_EG_PSP_21mo,Grey literature,"Living Shorelines (SCC), NOAA, SFSU",San Francisco,San Rafael Shoreline ('TNC'),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Green crabs,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo Stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,"Replanted in 2013 after 2012 plots ""did not succeed""",Y,Point San Pablo,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,2013,Late July-August,Summer,3,approximately every 3 months,21,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,576,54,ND,10.667,14.52,ND,ND,NA,Successful establishment,ND,Y,"There was no explicit shoot density success criteria so, if > 1 shoot/plot, made it Y otherwise, N",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,It's hard to believe they didn't measure any of these environmental parameters--I think that they probably did just don't focus on reporting that here.,Y,Y,"Romaleon antennariuum, Cancer productus, Emiotoca jacksoni, Syngnathus leptorhynchus, Cymatogaster aggregata, Triakis semifasciata, Moron saxatilis, Onchorhyncus mykiss, Acipenser medirostris","Red rock crab, Perch, Steelhead, Striped bass, Sturgeon",Quantitative: deployed traps ,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_Living_Shorelines,SF_Living_Shorelines_TNC_EG_PSP,SF_Living_Shorelines_TNC_EG_PSP_24mo,Grey literature,"Living Shorelines (SCC), NOAA, SFSU",San Francisco,San Rafael Shoreline ('TNC'),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Green crabs,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo Stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,"Replanted in 2013 after 2012 plots ""did not succeed""",Y,Point San Pablo,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,2013,Late July-August,Summer,3,approximately every 3 months,24,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,576,54,ND,10.667,18.24,ND,ND,NA,Successful establishment,ND,Y,"There was no explicit shoot density success criteria so, if > 1 shoot/plot, made it Y otherwise, N",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,It's hard to believe they didn't measure any of these environmental parameters--I think that they probably did just don't focus on reporting that here.,Y,Y,"Romaleon antennariuum, Cancer productus, Emiotoca jacksoni, Syngnathus leptorhynchus, Cymatogaster aggregata, Triakis semifasciata, Moron saxatilis, Onchorhyncus mykiss, Acipenser medirostris","Red rock crab, Perch, Steelhead, Striped bass, Sturgeon",Quantitative: deployed traps ,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_Living_Shorelines,SF_Living_Shorelines_TNC_EG_O_PSP,SF_Living_Shorelines_TNC_EG_O_PSP_12mo,Grey literature,"Living Shorelines (SCC), NOAA, SFSU",San Francisco,San Rafael Shoreline ('TNC'),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Green crabs,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo Stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,"Replanted in 2013 after 2012 plots ""did not succeed""",Y,Point San Pablo,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,2013,Late July-August,Summer,3,approximately every 3 months,12,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,576,54,ND,10.667,0,ND,ND,NA,Successful establishment,ND,N,"There was no explicit shoot density success criteria so, if > 1 shoot/plot, made it Y otherwise, N",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,It's hard to believe they didn't measure any of these environmental parameters--I think that they probably did just don't focus on reporting that here.,Y,Y,"Romaleon antennariuum, Cancer productus, Emiotoca jacksoni, Syngnathus leptorhynchus, Cymatogaster aggregata, Triakis semifasciata, Moron saxatilis, Onchorhyncus mykiss, Acipenser medirostris","Red rock crab, Perch, Steelhead, Striped bass, Sturgeon",Quantitative: deployed traps ,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_Living_Shorelines,SF_Living_Shorelines_TNC_EG_O_PSP,SF_Living_Shorelines_TNC_EG_O_PSP_15mo,Grey literature,"Living Shorelines (SCC), NOAA, SFSU",San Francisco,San Rafael Shoreline ('TNC'),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Green crabs,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo Stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,"Replanted in 2013 after 2012 plots ""did not succeed""",Y,Point San Pablo,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,2013,Late July-August,Summer,3,approximately every 3 months,15,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,576,54,ND,10.667,0,ND,ND,NA,Successful establishment,ND,N,"There was no explicit shoot density success criteria so, if > 1 shoot/plot, made it Y otherwise, N",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,It's hard to believe they didn't measure any of these environmental parameters--I think that they probably did just don't focus on reporting that here.,Y,Y,"Romaleon antennariuum, Cancer productus, Emiotoca jacksoni, Syngnathus leptorhynchus, Cymatogaster aggregata, Triakis semifasciata, Moron saxatilis, Onchorhyncus mykiss, Acipenser medirostris","Red rock crab, Perch, Steelhead, Striped bass, Sturgeon",Quantitative: deployed traps ,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_Living_Shorelines,SF_Living_Shorelines_TNC_EG_O_PSP,SF_Living_Shorelines_TNC_EG_O_PSP_18mo,Grey literature,"Living Shorelines (SCC), NOAA, SFSU",San Francisco,San Rafael Shoreline ('TNC'),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Green crabs,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo Stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,"Replanted in 2013 after 2012 plots ""did not succeed""",Y,Point San Pablo,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,2013,Late July-August,Summer,3,approximately every 3 months,18,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,576,54,ND,10.667,0,ND,ND,NA,Successful establishment,ND,N,"There was no explicit shoot density success criteria so, if > 1 shoot/plot, made it Y otherwise, N",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,It's hard to believe they didn't measure any of these environmental parameters--I think that they probably did just don't focus on reporting that here.,Y,Y,"Romaleon antennariuum, Cancer productus, Emiotoca jacksoni, Syngnathus leptorhynchus, Cymatogaster aggregata, Triakis semifasciata, Moron saxatilis, Onchorhyncus mykiss, Acipenser medirostris","Red rock crab, Perch, Steelhead, Striped bass, Sturgeon",Quantitative: deployed traps ,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_Living_Shorelines,SF_Living_Shorelines_TNC_EG_O_PSP,SF_Living_Shorelines_TNC_EG_O_PSP_21mo,Grey literature,"Living Shorelines (SCC), NOAA, SFSU",San Francisco,San Rafael Shoreline ('TNC'),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Green crabs,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo Stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,"Replanted in 2013 after 2012 plots ""did not succeed""",Y,Point San Pablo,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,2013,Late July-August,Summer,3,approximately every 3 months,21,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,576,54,ND,10.667,0,ND,ND,NA,Successful establishment,ND,N,"There was no explicit shoot density success criteria so, if > 1 shoot/plot, made it Y otherwise, N",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,It's hard to believe they didn't measure any of these environmental parameters--I think that they probably did just don't focus on reporting that here.,Y,Y,"Romaleon antennariuum, Cancer productus, Emiotoca jacksoni, Syngnathus leptorhynchus, Cymatogaster aggregata, Triakis semifasciata, Moron saxatilis, Onchorhyncus mykiss, Acipenser medirostris","Red rock crab, Perch, Steelhead, Striped bass, Sturgeon",Quantitative: deployed traps ,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_Living_Shorelines,SF_Living_Shorelines_TNC_EG_PSP+PM,SF_Living_Shorelines_TNC_EG_O_PSP_24mo,Grey literature,"Living Shorelines (SCC), NOAA, SFSU",San Francisco,San Rafael Shoreline ('TNC'),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Green crabs,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo Stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,"Replanted in 2013 after 2012 plots ""did not succeed""",Y,Point San Pablo,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,2013,Late July-August,Summer,3,approximately every 3 months,24,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,576,54,ND,10.667,0,ND,ND,NA,Successful establishment,ND,N,"There was no explicit shoot density success criteria so, if > 1 shoot/plot, made it Y otherwise, N",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,It's hard to believe they didn't measure any of these environmental parameters--I think that they probably did just don't focus on reporting that here.,Y,Y,"Romaleon antennariuum, Cancer productus, Emiotoca jacksoni, Syngnathus leptorhynchus, Cymatogaster aggregata, Triakis semifasciata, Moron saxatilis, Onchorhyncus mykiss, Acipenser medirostris","Red rock crab, Perch, Steelhead, Striped bass, Sturgeon",Quantitative: deployed traps ,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_Living_Shorelines,SF_Living_Shorelines_TNC_EG_PM,SF_Living_Shorelines_TNC_EG_PM_12mo,Grey literature,"Living Shorelines (SCC), NOAA, SFSU",San Francisco,San Rafael Shoreline ('TNC'),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Green crabs,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo Stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,"Replanted in 2013 after 2012 plots ""did not succeed""",Y,Point Molate,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,2013,Late July-August,Summer,3,approximately every 3 months,12,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,576,54,ND,10.667,2.72,ND,ND,NA,Successful establishment,ND,Y,"There was no explicit shoot density success criteria so, if > 1 shoot/plot, made it Y otherwise, N",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,It's hard to believe they didn't measure any of these environmental parameters--I think that they probably did just don't focus on reporting that here.,Y,Y,"Romaleon antennariuum, Cancer productus, Emiotoca jacksoni, Syngnathus leptorhynchus, Cymatogaster aggregata, Triakis semifasciata, Moron saxatilis, Onchorhyncus mykiss, Acipenser medirostris","Red rock crab, Perch, Steelhead, Striped bass, Sturgeon",Quantitative: deployed traps ,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_Living_Shorelines,SF_Living_Shorelines_TNC_EG_PM,SF_Living_Shorelines_TNC_EG_PM_15mo,Grey literature,"Living Shorelines (SCC), NOAA, SFSU",San Francisco,San Rafael Shoreline ('TNC'),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Green crabs,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo Stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,"Replanted in 2013 after 2012 plots ""did not succeed""",Y,Point Molate,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,2013,Late July-August,Summer,3,approximately every 3 months,15,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,576,54,ND,10.667,2.59,ND,ND,NA,Successful establishment,ND,Y,"There was no explicit shoot density success criteria so, if > 1 shoot/plot, made it Y otherwise, N",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,It's hard to believe they didn't measure any of these environmental parameters--I think that they probably did just don't focus on reporting that here.,Y,Y,"Romaleon antennariuum, Cancer productus, Emiotoca jacksoni, Syngnathus leptorhynchus, Cymatogaster aggregata, Triakis semifasciata, Moron saxatilis, Onchorhyncus mykiss, Acipenser medirostris","Red rock crab, Perch, Steelhead, Striped bass, Sturgeon",Quantitative: deployed traps ,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_Living_Shorelines,SF_Living_Shorelines_TNC_EG_PM,SF_Living_Shorelines_TNC_EG_PM_18mo,Grey literature,"Living Shorelines (SCC), NOAA, SFSU",San Francisco,San Rafael Shoreline ('TNC'),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Green crabs,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo Stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,"Replanted in 2013 after 2012 plots ""did not succeed""",Y,Point Molate,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,2013,Late July-August,Summer,3,approximately every 3 months,18,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,576,54,ND,10.667,7.46,ND,ND,NA,Successful establishment,ND,Y,"There was no explicit shoot density success criteria so, if > 1 shoot/plot, made it Y otherwise, N",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,It's hard to believe they didn't measure any of these environmental parameters--I think that they probably did just don't focus on reporting that here.,Y,Y,"Romaleon antennariuum, Cancer productus, Emiotoca jacksoni, Syngnathus leptorhynchus, Cymatogaster aggregata, Triakis semifasciata, Moron saxatilis, Onchorhyncus mykiss, Acipenser medirostris","Red rock crab, Perch, Steelhead, Striped bass, Sturgeon",Quantitative: deployed traps ,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_Living_Shorelines,SF_Living_Shorelines_TNC_EG_PM,SF_Living_Shorelines_TNC_EG_PM_21mo,Grey literature,"Living Shorelines (SCC), NOAA, SFSU",San Francisco,San Rafael Shoreline ('TNC'),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Green crabs,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo Stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,"Replanted in 2013 after 2012 plots ""did not succeed""",Y,Point Molate,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,2013,Late July-August,Summer,3,approximately every 3 months,21,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,576,54,ND,10.667,9.83,ND,ND,NA,Successful establishment,ND,Y,"There was no explicit shoot density success criteria so, if > 1 shoot/plot, made it Y otherwise, N",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,It's hard to believe they didn't measure any of these environmental parameters--I think that they probably did just don't focus on reporting that here.,Y,Y,"Romaleon antennariuum, Cancer productus, Emiotoca jacksoni, Syngnathus leptorhynchus, Cymatogaster aggregata, Triakis semifasciata, Moron saxatilis, Onchorhyncus mykiss, Acipenser medirostris","Red rock crab, Perch, Steelhead, Striped bass, Sturgeon",Quantitative: deployed traps ,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_Living_Shorelines,SF_Living_Shorelines_TNC_EG_PM,SF_Living_Shorelines_TNC_EG_PM_24mo,Grey literature,"Living Shorelines (SCC), NOAA, SFSU",San Francisco,San Rafael Shoreline ('TNC'),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Green crabs,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo Stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,"Replanted in 2013 after 2012 plots ""did not succeed""",Y,Point Molate,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,2013,Late July-August,Summer,3,approximately every 3 months,24,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,576,54,ND,10.667,10.93,ND,ND,NA,Successful establishment,ND,Y,"There was no explicit shoot density success criteria so, if > 1 shoot/plot, made it Y otherwise, N",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,It's hard to believe they didn't measure any of these environmental parameters--I think that they probably did just don't focus on reporting that here.,Y,Y,"Romaleon antennariuum, Cancer productus, Emiotoca jacksoni, Syngnathus leptorhynchus, Cymatogaster aggregata, Triakis semifasciata, Moron saxatilis, Onchorhyncus mykiss, Acipenser medirostris","Red rock crab, Perch, Steelhead, Striped bass, Sturgeon",Quantitative: deployed traps ,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_Living_Shorelines,SF_Living_Shorelines_TNC_EG_PM+PSP,SF_Living_Shorelines_TNC_EG_PM+PSP_27mo,Grey literature,"Living Shorelines (SCC), NOAA, SFSU",San Francisco,San Rafael Shoreline ('TNC'),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Green crabs,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo Stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,"Replanted in 2013 after 2012 plots ""did not succeed""",Y,Point Molate and Point San Pablo--could no longer distinguish between plots with different donor sources,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,2013,Late July-August,Summer,3,approximately every 3 months,27,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,1152,108,ND,10.667,15.2,ND,ND,NA,Successful establishment,ND,Y,"There was no explicit shoot density success criteria so, if > 1 shoot/plot, made it Y otherwise, N",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,It's hard to believe they didn't measure any of these environmental parameters--I think that they probably did just don't focus on reporting that here.,Y,Y,"Romaleon antennariuum, Cancer productus, Emiotoca jacksoni, Syngnathus leptorhynchus, Cymatogaster aggregata, Triakis semifasciata, Moron saxatilis, Onchorhyncus mykiss, Acipenser medirostris","Red rock crab, Perch, Steelhead, Striped bass, Sturgeon",Quantitative: deployed traps ,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_Living_Shorelines,SF_Living_Shorelines_TNC_EG_PM+PSP,SF_Living_Shorelines_TNC_EG_PM+PSP_31mo,Grey literature,"Living Shorelines (SCC), NOAA, SFSU",San Francisco,San Rafael Shoreline ('TNC'),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Green crabs,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo Stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,"Replanted in 2013 after 2012 plots ""did not succeed""",Y,Point Molate and Point San Pablo--could no longer distinguish between plots with different donor sources,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,2013,Late July-August,Summer,3,approximately every 3 months,31,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,1152,108,ND,10.667,22.74,ND,ND,NA,Successful establishment,ND,Y,"There was no explicit shoot density success criteria so, if > 1 shoot/plot, made it Y otherwise, N",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,It's hard to believe they didn't measure any of these environmental parameters--I think that they probably did just don't focus on reporting that here.,Y,Y,"Romaleon antennariuum, Cancer productus, Emiotoca jacksoni, Syngnathus leptorhynchus, Cymatogaster aggregata, Triakis semifasciata, Moron saxatilis, Onchorhyncus mykiss, Acipenser medirostris","Red rock crab, Perch, Steelhead, Striped bass, Sturgeon",Quantitative: deployed traps ,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_Living_Shorelines,SF_Living_Shorelines_TNC_EG_PM+PSP,SF_Living_Shorelines_TNC_EG_PM+PSP_33mo,Grey literature,"Living Shorelines (SCC), NOAA, SFSU",San Francisco,San Rafael Shoreline ('TNC'),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Green crabs,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo Stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,"Replanted in 2013 after 2012 plots ""did not succeed""",Y,Point Molate and Point San Pablo--could no longer distinguish between plots with different donor sources,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,2013,Late July-August,Summer,3,approximately every 3 months,33,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,1152,108,ND,10.667,15.2,ND,ND,NA,Successful establishment,ND,Y,"There was no explicit shoot density success criteria so, if > 1 shoot/plot, made it Y otherwise, N",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,It's hard to believe they didn't measure any of these environmental parameters--I think that they probably did just don't focus on reporting that here.,Y,Y,"Romaleon antennariuum, Cancer productus, Emiotoca jacksoni, Syngnathus leptorhynchus, Cymatogaster aggregata, Triakis semifasciata, Moron saxatilis, Onchorhyncus mykiss, Acipenser medirostris","Red rock crab, Perch, Steelhead, Striped bass, Sturgeon",Quantitative: deployed traps ,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_Living_Shorelines,SF_Living_Shorelines_TNC_EG_PM+PSP,SF_Living_Shorelines_TNC_EG_PM+PSP_35mo,Grey literature,"Living Shorelines (SCC), NOAA, SFSU",San Francisco,San Rafael Shoreline ('TNC'),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Green crabs,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo Stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,"Replanted in 2013 after 2012 plots ""did not succeed""",Y,Point Molate and Point San Pablo--could no longer distinguish between plots with different donor sources,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,2013,Late July-August,Summer,3,approximately every 3 months,35,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,1152,108,ND,10.667,29.33,ND,ND,NA,Successful establishment,ND,Y,"There was no explicit shoot density success criteria so, if > 1 shoot/plot, made it Y otherwise, N",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,It's hard to believe they didn't measure any of these environmental parameters--I think that they probably did just don't focus on reporting that here.,Y,Y,"Romaleon antennariuum, Cancer productus, Emiotoca jacksoni, Syngnathus leptorhynchus, Cymatogaster aggregata, Triakis semifasciata, Moron saxatilis, Onchorhyncus mykiss, Acipenser medirostris","Red rock crab, Perch, Steelhead, Striped bass, Sturgeon",Quantitative: deployed traps ,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_Living_Shorelines,SF_Living_Shorelines_TNC_EG_O_PM,SF_Living_Shorelines_TNC_EG_O_PM_12mo,Grey literature,"Living Shorelines (SCC), NOAA, SFSU",San Francisco,San Rafael Shoreline ('TNC'),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Green crabs,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo Stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,"Replanted in 2013 after 2012 plots ""did not succeed""",Y,Point Molate,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,2013,Late July-August,Summer,3,approximately every 3 months,12,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,576,54,ND,10.667,2.37,ND,ND,NA,Successful establishment,ND,Y,"There was no explicit shoot density success criteria so, if > 1 shoot/plot, made it Y otherwise, N",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,It's hard to believe they didn't measure any of these environmental parameters--I think that they probably did just don't focus on reporting that here.,Y,Y,"Romaleon antennariuum, Cancer productus, Emiotoca jacksoni, Syngnathus leptorhynchus, Cymatogaster aggregata, Triakis semifasciata, Moron saxatilis, Onchorhyncus mykiss, Acipenser medirostris","Red rock crab, Perch, Steelhead, Striped bass, Sturgeon",Quantitative: deployed traps ,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_Living_Shorelines,SF_Living_Shorelines_TNC_EG_O_PM,SF_Living_Shorelines_TNC_EG_O_PM_15mo,Grey literature,"Living Shorelines (SCC), NOAA, SFSU",San Francisco,San Rafael Shoreline ('TNC'),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Green crabs,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo Stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,"Replanted in 2013 after 2012 plots ""did not succeed""",Y,Point Molate,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,2013,Late July-August,Summer,3,approximately every 3 months,15,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,576,54,ND,10.667,3.52,ND,ND,NA,Successful establishment,ND,Y,"There was no explicit shoot density success criteria so, if > 1 shoot/plot, made it Y otherwise, N",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,It's hard to believe they didn't measure any of these environmental parameters--I think that they probably did just don't focus on reporting that here.,Y,Y,"Romaleon antennariuum, Cancer productus, Emiotoca jacksoni, Syngnathus leptorhynchus, Cymatogaster aggregata, Triakis semifasciata, Moron saxatilis, Onchorhyncus mykiss, Acipenser medirostris","Red rock crab, Perch, Steelhead, Striped bass, Sturgeon",Quantitative: deployed traps ,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_Living_Shorelines,SF_Living_Shorelines_TNC_EG_O_PM,SF_Living_Shorelines_TNC_EG_O_PM_18mo,Grey literature,"Living Shorelines (SCC), NOAA, SFSU",San Francisco,San Rafael Shoreline ('TNC'),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Green crabs,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo Stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,"Replanted in 2013 after 2012 plots ""did not succeed""",Y,Point Molate,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,2013,Late July-August,Summer,3,approximately every 3 months,18,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,576,54,ND,10.667,5.2,ND,ND,NA,Successful establishment,ND,Y,"There was no explicit shoot density success criteria so, if > 1 shoot/plot, made it Y otherwise, N",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,It's hard to believe they didn't measure any of these environmental parameters--I think that they probably did just don't focus on reporting that here.,Y,Y,"Romaleon antennariuum, Cancer productus, Emiotoca jacksoni, Syngnathus leptorhynchus, Cymatogaster aggregata, Triakis semifasciata, Moron saxatilis, Onchorhyncus mykiss, Acipenser medirostris","Red rock crab, Perch, Steelhead, Striped bass, Sturgeon",Quantitative: deployed traps ,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_Living_Shorelines,SF_Living_Shorelines_TNC_EG_O_PM,SF_Living_Shorelines_TNC_EG_O_PM_21mo,Grey literature,"Living Shorelines (SCC), NOAA, SFSU",San Francisco,San Rafael Shoreline ('TNC'),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Green crabs,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo Stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,"Replanted in 2013 after 2012 plots ""did not succeed""",Y,Point Molate,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,2013,Late July-August,Summer,3,approximately every 3 months,21,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,576,54,ND,10.667,4.86,ND,ND,NA,Successful establishment,ND,Y,"There was no explicit shoot density success criteria so, if > 1 shoot/plot, made it Y otherwise, N",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,It's hard to believe they didn't measure any of these environmental parameters--I think that they probably did just don't focus on reporting that here.,Y,Y,"Romaleon antennariuum, Cancer productus, Emiotoca jacksoni, Syngnathus leptorhynchus, Cymatogaster aggregata, Triakis semifasciata, Moron saxatilis, Onchorhyncus mykiss, Acipenser medirostris","Red rock crab, Perch, Steelhead, Striped bass, Sturgeon",Quantitative: deployed traps ,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_Living_Shorelines,SF_Living_Shorelines_TNC_EG_O_PM,SF_Living_Shorelines_TNC_EG_O_PM_24mo,Grey literature,"Living Shorelines (SCC), NOAA, SFSU",San Francisco,San Rafael Shoreline ('TNC'),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Green crabs,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo Stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,"Replanted in 2013 after 2012 plots ""did not succeed""",Y,Point Molate,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,2013,Late July-August,Summer,3,approximately every 3 months,24,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,576,54,ND,10.667,4.28,ND,ND,NA,Successful establishment,ND,Y,"There was no explicit shoot density success criteria so, if > 1 shoot/plot, made it Y otherwise, N",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,It's hard to believe they didn't measure any of these environmental parameters--I think that they probably did just don't focus on reporting that here.,Y,Y,"Romaleon antennariuum, Cancer productus, Emiotoca jacksoni, Syngnathus leptorhynchus, Cymatogaster aggregata, Triakis semifasciata, Moron saxatilis, Onchorhyncus mykiss, Acipenser medirostris","Red rock crab, Perch, Steelhead, Striped bass, Sturgeon",Quantitative: deployed traps ,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_Living_Shorelines,SF_Living_Shorelines_TNC_EG_O_PM+PSP,SF_Living_Shorelines_TNC_EG_PM+PSP_27mo,Grey literature,"Living Shorelines (SCC), NOAA, SFSU",San Francisco,San Rafael Shoreline ('TNC'),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Green crabs,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo Stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,"Replanted in 2013 after 2012 plots ""did not succeed""",Y,Point Molate and Point San Pablo--could no longer distinguish between plots with different donor sources,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,2013,Late July-August,Summer,3,approximately every 3 months,27,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,1152,108,ND,10.667,11.74,ND,ND,NA,Successful establishment,ND,Y,"There was no explicit shoot density success criteria so, if > 1 shoot/plot, made it Y otherwise, N",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,It's hard to believe they didn't measure any of these environmental parameters--I think that they probably did just don't focus on reporting that here.,Y,Y,"Romaleon antennariuum, Cancer productus, Emiotoca jacksoni, Syngnathus leptorhynchus, Cymatogaster aggregata, Triakis semifasciata, Moron saxatilis, Onchorhyncus mykiss, Acipenser medirostris","Red rock crab, Perch, Steelhead, Striped bass, Sturgeon",Quantitative: deployed traps ,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_Living_Shorelines,SF_Living_Shorelines_TNC_EG_O_PM+PSP,SF_Living_Shorelines_TNC_EG_PM+PSP_31mo,Grey literature,"Living Shorelines (SCC), NOAA, SFSU",San Francisco,San Rafael Shoreline ('TNC'),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Green crabs,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo Stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,"Replanted in 2013 after 2012 plots ""did not succeed""",Y,Point Molate and Point San Pablo--could no longer distinguish between plots with different donor sources,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,2013,Late July-August,Summer,3,approximately every 3 months,31,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,1152,108,ND,10.667,8.26,ND,ND,NA,Successful establishment,ND,Y,"There was no explicit shoot density success criteria so, if > 1 shoot/plot, made it Y otherwise, N",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,It's hard to believe they didn't measure any of these environmental parameters--I think that they probably did just don't focus on reporting that here.,Y,Y,"Romaleon antennariuum, Cancer productus, Emiotoca jacksoni, Syngnathus leptorhynchus, Cymatogaster aggregata, Triakis semifasciata, Moron saxatilis, Onchorhyncus mykiss, Acipenser medirostris","Red rock crab, Perch, Steelhead, Striped bass, Sturgeon",Quantitative: deployed traps ,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_Living_Shorelines,SF_Living_Shorelines_TNC_EG_O_PM+PSP,SF_Living_Shorelines_TNC_EG_PM+PSP_33mo,Grey literature,"Living Shorelines (SCC), NOAA, SFSU",San Francisco,San Rafael Shoreline ('TNC'),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Green crabs,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo Stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,"Replanted in 2013 after 2012 plots ""did not succeed""",Y,Point Molate and Point San Pablo--could no longer distinguish between plots with different donor sources,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,2013,Late July-August,Summer,3,approximately every 3 months,33,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,1152,108,ND,10.667,12.83,ND,ND,NA,Successful establishment,ND,Y,"There was no explicit shoot density success criteria so, if > 1 shoot/plot, made it Y otherwise, N",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,It's hard to believe they didn't measure any of these environmental parameters--I think that they probably did just don't focus on reporting that here.,Y,Y,"Romaleon antennariuum, Cancer productus, Emiotoca jacksoni, Syngnathus leptorhynchus, Cymatogaster aggregata, Triakis semifasciata, Moron saxatilis, Onchorhyncus mykiss, Acipenser medirostris","Red rock crab, Perch, Steelhead, Striped bass, Sturgeon",Quantitative: deployed traps ,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
SF_Living_Shorelines,SF_Living_Shorelines_TNC_EG_O_PM+PSP,SF_Living_Shorelines_TNC_EG_PM+PSP_35mo,Grey literature,"Living Shorelines (SCC), NOAA, SFSU",San Francisco,San Rafael Shoreline ('TNC'),37.9,-122.4,N. Cal,Green crabs,N,Non-mitigation,Active,Y,"Bamboo/Rebar Stake, Seed",Bamboo Stake transplant method PLUS BuDS,"Replanted in 2013 after 2012 plots ""did not succeed""",Y,Point Molate and Point San Pablo--could no longer distinguish between plots with different donor sources,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,2013,Late July-August,Summer,3,approximately every 3 months,35,NA,ND,NA,ND,ND,1152,108,ND,10.667,11.41,ND,ND,NA,Successful establishment,ND,Y,"There was no explicit shoot density success criteria so, if > 1 shoot/plot, made it Y otherwise, N",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,NA,It's hard to believe they didn't measure any of these environmental parameters--I think that they probably did just don't focus on reporting that here.,Y,Y,"Romaleon antennariuum, Cancer productus, Emiotoca jacksoni, Syngnathus leptorhynchus, Cymatogaster aggregata, Triakis semifasciata, Moron saxatilis, Onchorhyncus mykiss, Acipenser medirostris","Red rock crab, Perch, Steelhead, Striped bass, Sturgeon",Quantitative: deployed traps ,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA
Holmes_Harbor,NicholsBoatBuilding_Plot1of1,NicholsBoatBuilding_Plot1of1_12mo,Grey literature,NA,Puget Sound,"Holmes Harbor, WA",47.9,-122.5,WA,ND,N,Mitigation,Active,N,Seed,Deployed BuDs,Deployed 12 BuDs and montiored the area one year later for seedlings,N,NA,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,2004,August,Summer,1,once 12 months after restoration,12,1,ND,"They say they measure depth, but don't have it in the report",ND,ND,ND,8943,10166,26,38,53,ND,NA,ND,ND,N,"The area in this report are presented as ""number of quadrats where eelgrass coverage was in a certain denisty class"". To report area here, I added all quadrats (Table 2) before restoration that had cover class 1 (1-25%) or higher, and then the same after. Success: they note that there are seedlings coming in, just not quite sufficient yet to meet the pre-impact densities, so not deemd successful at this 1 yr mark, but likely could get there. ",N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,ND,ND,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,#REF!,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA